Staffing at S G Cowen
Investment Banking Industry HR is central Compensation costs 50% of revenue Difficult to get talent, esp. before the dotcom bust
S G Cowen Assets of over $ 430bn Focus on healthcare and technology Medium sized Less bureaucracy Move much faster
S G Cowen (contd.) More freedom and responsibility “the type of person who does well here doesn’t want to be told what to do.” Hands on high touch Create jobs for people Recruiting included on performance review Rejection of an offer as a blow to co.
Hiring Process New class of associates Core business schools Next 15 schools in the top 25: loyal Top of the class Defect after dotcom bust? HR as symbols Resist any kind of ‘science’
Criteria for Hiring Demonstrated a pattern of success Fast learners “fit” Lack of information Signals that can ‘differentiate’ Institutions as certifications  Clients also look for this: non MBAs?
Informational Interview Team captains Banking professionals Alumni First level screens Realistic job previews? Standard presentation by HR? Involvement of the bankers
On Campus Interview Sr./ associates conduct Identification of talent Assessing skills Liable for the quality of candidates brought  Easier to handle by HR Associates are associates Breadth & long term view  Future peers and rivals
On Campus Interview (contd.) Rae as institutional memory Knowledge mgmt.? Yield: 12.5% Detailed notes during interviews Culture fit
Super Saturday Top bankers Multiple interviews/ interviewers Confident of ‘whipping through the list’ Yield: 66% Pseudo social setting with a formal interview process Very finality
Interviewing Each had their own methodology “ Psychologists and sociologists have studied the reliability and validity of job interviews in great depth, and their conclusions are somewhat  devastating . Job interviews are  neither reliable nor valid in general .” (Baron & Kreps, Strategic human resources, 1999)
Interviewing (contd. 1) Recommendation of literature More structure Hiring is a ‘romantic’ process Date vs. dry logic of arranged marriage “ A good HR practitioner has to be a proficient detective who asks the kind of questions that get candidates to open up and reveal their good and bad workplace characteristics.”
Interviewing (contd. 2) “Red flags” Culture fit Variance is good Share real life experience Some structure Relative evaluation Take notes
Aids for Hiring Grades Grades and job performance are loosely correlated How honest are references? Psychological tests Interpreting the results Cause-effect relationships at work
Culture through Hiring Get people to behave like a firm Engaging the entire firm “ right stuff” Is a firm in which everyone fits truly a desirable thing? “ Ideal type” Personal values vs. organisational values Cowen stands vs. aspires
Candidates Godlewska “ Culture fit”?: English, social skills Go getter, technical skills Street Leadership: army Wharton grades not disclosed Lack of interest
Candidates (contd.) Goldstein Consistently good performer Family “Too mature” Sanchez Entrepreneur, self starter Grades, other interests Ran a test coaching service himself
Barriers to Change Frank discussion on what the job demands Looking different to third parties Institutional pressures
References Posthuma et al. 2002 Beyond employment interview validity.  Personnel psychology , 55, 1-81. Campion 1997 A review of structure in the selection interview.  Personnel psychology , 690.

Cowen

  • 1.
  • 2.
    Investment Banking IndustryHR is central Compensation costs 50% of revenue Difficult to get talent, esp. before the dotcom bust
  • 3.
    S G CowenAssets of over $ 430bn Focus on healthcare and technology Medium sized Less bureaucracy Move much faster
  • 4.
    S G Cowen(contd.) More freedom and responsibility “the type of person who does well here doesn’t want to be told what to do.” Hands on high touch Create jobs for people Recruiting included on performance review Rejection of an offer as a blow to co.
  • 5.
    Hiring Process Newclass of associates Core business schools Next 15 schools in the top 25: loyal Top of the class Defect after dotcom bust? HR as symbols Resist any kind of ‘science’
  • 6.
    Criteria for HiringDemonstrated a pattern of success Fast learners “fit” Lack of information Signals that can ‘differentiate’ Institutions as certifications Clients also look for this: non MBAs?
  • 7.
    Informational Interview Teamcaptains Banking professionals Alumni First level screens Realistic job previews? Standard presentation by HR? Involvement of the bankers
  • 8.
    On Campus InterviewSr./ associates conduct Identification of talent Assessing skills Liable for the quality of candidates brought Easier to handle by HR Associates are associates Breadth & long term view Future peers and rivals
  • 9.
    On Campus Interview(contd.) Rae as institutional memory Knowledge mgmt.? Yield: 12.5% Detailed notes during interviews Culture fit
  • 10.
    Super Saturday Topbankers Multiple interviews/ interviewers Confident of ‘whipping through the list’ Yield: 66% Pseudo social setting with a formal interview process Very finality
  • 11.
    Interviewing Each hadtheir own methodology “ Psychologists and sociologists have studied the reliability and validity of job interviews in great depth, and their conclusions are somewhat devastating . Job interviews are neither reliable nor valid in general .” (Baron & Kreps, Strategic human resources, 1999)
  • 12.
    Interviewing (contd. 1)Recommendation of literature More structure Hiring is a ‘romantic’ process Date vs. dry logic of arranged marriage “ A good HR practitioner has to be a proficient detective who asks the kind of questions that get candidates to open up and reveal their good and bad workplace characteristics.”
  • 13.
    Interviewing (contd. 2)“Red flags” Culture fit Variance is good Share real life experience Some structure Relative evaluation Take notes
  • 14.
    Aids for HiringGrades Grades and job performance are loosely correlated How honest are references? Psychological tests Interpreting the results Cause-effect relationships at work
  • 15.
    Culture through HiringGet people to behave like a firm Engaging the entire firm “ right stuff” Is a firm in which everyone fits truly a desirable thing? “ Ideal type” Personal values vs. organisational values Cowen stands vs. aspires
  • 16.
    Candidates Godlewska “Culture fit”?: English, social skills Go getter, technical skills Street Leadership: army Wharton grades not disclosed Lack of interest
  • 17.
    Candidates (contd.) GoldsteinConsistently good performer Family “Too mature” Sanchez Entrepreneur, self starter Grades, other interests Ran a test coaching service himself
  • 18.
    Barriers to ChangeFrank discussion on what the job demands Looking different to third parties Institutional pressures
  • 19.
    References Posthuma etal. 2002 Beyond employment interview validity. Personnel psychology , 55, 1-81. Campion 1997 A review of structure in the selection interview. Personnel psychology , 690.