This document provides an overview of cost of quality concepts. It discusses the different types of quality costs including prevention costs, appraisal costs, internal failure costs, and external failure costs. Prevention costs include activities like quality training, process control planning, and supplier quality assurance. Appraisal costs include activities like auditing, inspection, and testing. Internal failure costs capture scrap, rework, and engineering changes. External failure costs include warranty costs, customer returns, and liability suits. The document emphasizes tracking quality costs over time to understand their impact and drive improvement in quality programs.
Quality and Cost Management: Methods and Resultstimwrodgers
Summary of methods and results for reducing cost, driving quality upstream, optimizing systems, managing suppliers, accelerating time to market, and improving performance
The economy is developing very fast and it is becoming more competitive with each passing day as customers also become more difficult (Weckenmann and Akkasoglu, 2012). The organization has to face more fierce competitions and challenges every day. Many companies provide the same products or services for the same customers (Weckenmann, Akkasoglu and Werner, 2015). To survive on this conjuncture, they must build up their reputation based on great product quality.
Many foundational principles of quality were introduced and developed by Deming in 1986 (Wicks. A and Roethlein. C, 2009). They had quickly become essential factors in many companies’ operation. Consequently, quality management must be given more attention like an important strategy (Khaled Omar and Murgan, 2014). Many authors think that quality of products or services has a close relationship with customer satisfaction. In order to help companies control their product quality more efficiently, the concept of cost of quality (CoQ) was formed and developed continuously.
Quality cost philosophy was first described by Armand V. Feigenbaum (1956) in his book, “Total quality management”. After that, many modified definitions of CoQ had appeared. Chiadamrong (2003) said, “The cost of quality is a comprehensive system, not a piecemeal tool.” According to Chopra and Garg (2012), quality cost is the gap between actual cost and perfect cost of products or service. In general, quality cost is a useful methodology that helps companies to build trust with customers, ensure sustainable development and increase their profit.
Crandall and Julien (2010) said that The American Society of Quality (ASQ) define cost of quality as follows: “Quality costs are the total of the cost incurred by investing in the prevention of nonconformance to requirements, appraising a product or service for conformance to requirements, and failing to meet requirements. The sum of these costs represents the difference between the actual cost of a product or service and what the reduced cost would be if there were no possibility of substandard service, failure of products or defects in their manufacturing.”
This paper will provide general and in-depth information about costs of quality and its development up to the present day with two main parts. The first part will concentrate on concepts, definitions, and models of quality costs as well as how it was formed. The second part will contain real example, discussion and analysis about how CoQ concept is as relevant today as it has ever been.
The New Face of Quality in Office and Service EnvironmentsTKMG, Inc.
To subscribe: http://www.ksmartin.com/subscribe
To learn about Karen's books and products, please visit: http://www.ksmartin.com/books-products/.
This is a presentation I gave at the American Society for Quality World Conference on Quality and Improvement in St. Louis, MO in May 2010.
Implementation of lean in Vestas Nacelles, 11th May, Lean Excellence seminar of Advance Business Network (www.advanceschool.org), F. Velluto, E. Nicoletti
Quality and Cost Management: Methods and Resultstimwrodgers
Summary of methods and results for reducing cost, driving quality upstream, optimizing systems, managing suppliers, accelerating time to market, and improving performance
The economy is developing very fast and it is becoming more competitive with each passing day as customers also become more difficult (Weckenmann and Akkasoglu, 2012). The organization has to face more fierce competitions and challenges every day. Many companies provide the same products or services for the same customers (Weckenmann, Akkasoglu and Werner, 2015). To survive on this conjuncture, they must build up their reputation based on great product quality.
Many foundational principles of quality were introduced and developed by Deming in 1986 (Wicks. A and Roethlein. C, 2009). They had quickly become essential factors in many companies’ operation. Consequently, quality management must be given more attention like an important strategy (Khaled Omar and Murgan, 2014). Many authors think that quality of products or services has a close relationship with customer satisfaction. In order to help companies control their product quality more efficiently, the concept of cost of quality (CoQ) was formed and developed continuously.
Quality cost philosophy was first described by Armand V. Feigenbaum (1956) in his book, “Total quality management”. After that, many modified definitions of CoQ had appeared. Chiadamrong (2003) said, “The cost of quality is a comprehensive system, not a piecemeal tool.” According to Chopra and Garg (2012), quality cost is the gap between actual cost and perfect cost of products or service. In general, quality cost is a useful methodology that helps companies to build trust with customers, ensure sustainable development and increase their profit.
Crandall and Julien (2010) said that The American Society of Quality (ASQ) define cost of quality as follows: “Quality costs are the total of the cost incurred by investing in the prevention of nonconformance to requirements, appraising a product or service for conformance to requirements, and failing to meet requirements. The sum of these costs represents the difference between the actual cost of a product or service and what the reduced cost would be if there were no possibility of substandard service, failure of products or defects in their manufacturing.”
This paper will provide general and in-depth information about costs of quality and its development up to the present day with two main parts. The first part will concentrate on concepts, definitions, and models of quality costs as well as how it was formed. The second part will contain real example, discussion and analysis about how CoQ concept is as relevant today as it has ever been.
The New Face of Quality in Office and Service EnvironmentsTKMG, Inc.
To subscribe: http://www.ksmartin.com/subscribe
To learn about Karen's books and products, please visit: http://www.ksmartin.com/books-products/.
This is a presentation I gave at the American Society for Quality World Conference on Quality and Improvement in St. Louis, MO in May 2010.
Implementation of lean in Vestas Nacelles, 11th May, Lean Excellence seminar of Advance Business Network (www.advanceschool.org), F. Velluto, E. Nicoletti
Cost of Quality is a widely spread and widely misunderstood concept.Here is a presentation that will evaporate all your doubts regarding this topic.A very well explained case study of H&S motors.It is a very well structured presentation.
5. Name of presentation5
The highest quality producer is the lowest cost producer
Balance in Quality Cost
6. Name of presentation6
Taguchi Quality Loss Function (QLF)
Quality cost are usually quantified in terms of tangible cost
such as rework and scrap cost, and customer warranty. These
losses constitute only the tip of the iceberg.
What about the intangible costs such as
management/engineering time, inventory, customer
dissatisfaction, and loss market share?
QLF is a method used to approximate these hidden and long
term losses.
(1) Trial-and-error approach
(2) Design of experiments
(3) TAGUCHI Method
Dr. Genichi Taguchi
7. Name of presentation7
Taguchi Quality Loss Function (QLF)
Value of quality characteristics
Loss$
y
L = k ( y - T )²
L = Loss in $’s
k = Cost coefficient
y = Value of quality characteristics.
T = Target value.
LSL USL
8. Name of presentation8
Why Examine the Cost of Quality?
1. Get management attention
2. Change the way employee think about errors
3. Provide better return on the quality improvement program
4. Provide a tool to measure impact of corrective actions
5. Provide a tool to measure the impact of poor-quality on profits
Prevention Scrap
Elements of Cost of Quality (COQ)
9. Name of presentation9
Resultant Cost = Failure Cost, Defect Cost.
Controllable Cost = Prevention and Appraisal Cost.
Prevention vs. Scrap Cost
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Controllable Effort
Cost
Total Cost
Controllable
Cost
Resultant Cost
A
Low
High
10. Name of presentation10
1. Prevention Cost
- Cost of all activities specifically designed to prevent poor quality in products.
2. Appraisal Costs.
- Cost associated with measuring, evaluating or auditing products to ensure
conformance to quality standards .
3. Internal Failure Costs.
- Failure costs occurring prior to delivery or shipment of the product.
4. External Failure Costs.
- Failure costs occurring after delivery or shipment of the product.
Elements of COQ
11. Name of presentation11
Cost of Conformance
• Prevention-Cost associated with design,
implementation and maintaining a quality
system
• Appraisal-Cost associated with
measuring conformance
12. Name of presentation12
Examples of Prevention Costs
• Developing the quality / process control plan
• Quality education and training.
• Vendor surveys (Supplier Quality Assurance )
• Design reviews.
• Quality Improvement Team projects.
13. Name of presentation13
Supplier Quality Cost
Supplier Quality Cost can be categorized as part of Prevention Cost
as it involves Quality Assurance of Incoming materials.
Apparent Supplier Quality Cost
Cost of Supplier Quality Surveys.
Cost of Receiving and Source Inspection.
Cost of dispositioning nonconformance purchased materials.
Cost of scrap and rework of supplier caused nonconformance.
Cost of site visit to correct supplier service problems.
Hidden Supplier Costs
Cost incurred by supplier at the supplier’s facility
Cost incurred by buyer in solving problems at the supplier’s facility
14. Name of presentation14
1. Cost of processing incoming rejection (documentation, return expenses) :
Study show that each rejected lot would require $100 to process
Two rejected lots = 2 Lots X $100/Lot = $200
2. Cost of complaint investigation ( BUQE)
Man hours required to investigate the root cause. Study show cost per man hour is $20
10 Man hours required = 10 man hrs X $20/man hr = $200
3. Cost of receiving Inspection (IQA)
Use IQA inspector labor standard and average hourly wages to process the problematic lots.
Inspector require 1.2 hours to process one lot, and their hourly wage is $15.
1.2 labor hrs/Lot X $15/labor hour X 2 Lots = $36
4. Total purchased from supplier = $10,000.
($36 + $200 +$200 ) + $10,000
$10,000
QCPI =
FAIR= 1.044
Example
Supplier having two rejected lot for month of June:
16. Name of presentation16
Prevention Cost - 2
Category Description Example
Apparent Supplier
Quality Assurance
-Supplier Quality Surveys
-Receiving and Source
Inspection.
-Dispositioning nonconformance
purchased materials.
-scrap and rework of supplier
caused nonconformance.
-site visit to correct supplier
service problems.
Hidden Supplier
Quality Assurance
-Cost incurred by supplier at the
supplier’s facility
-Cost incurred by buyer in
solving problems at the
supplier’s facility
Quality
Improvement
Projects
-PBU and SBU product or
process continuous
improvement project (e.g. Tool
life management, Blade etc)
17. Name of presentation17
Examples of Appraisal Costs
Quality audits of the process.
Inspection and testing of products.
Inspection of purchased materials.
Calibration of test equipment.
Quality data processing.
Field performance testing.
19. Name of presentation19
Appraisal Cost-2
Category Description Example
Quality Data
Processing
The organization needs to
regularly collect and analyze
the product /service quality
performance (e.g. Cost of
Poor Quality, First Time Yield,
and Customer Complaint, etc)
Field Performance
Testing
Regular product performance
test and evaluation after
installation in the field to
properly evaluate or justify the
operation satisfaction (e.g.
SCADA)
Inspection and
Testing of products
0.00%
0.1%
0.2%
0.3%
0.4%
0.5%
0.6%
Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec
Prevention
1.00%
2.00%
3.00%
4.00%
5.00%
Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec
Internal scrap% Internal Goal
Internal&Scrap% -
Crystal
0.00%
0.05%
0.10%
0.15%
0.20%
0.25%
Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec
External
External% - Crystal
0.00%
0.1%
0.2%
0.3%
0.4%
0.5%
0.6%
Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec
Appraisal
Prevention% - Crystal Appraisal% - Crystal
COQ % Trend---Example
0.00%
0.1%
0.2%
0.3%
0.4%
0.5%
0.6%
Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec
Prevention
1.00%
2.00%
3.00%
4.00%
5.00%
Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec
Internal scrap% Internal Goal
Internal&Scrap% -
Crystal
0.00%
0.05%
0.10%
0.15%
0.20%
0.25%
Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec
External
External% - Crystal
0.00%
0.1%
0.2%
0.3%
0.4%
0.5%
0.6%
Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec
Appraisal
Prevention% - Crystal Appraisal% - Crystal
COQ % Trend---Example
20. Name of presentation20
Cost of Non-conformance:
•Internal Failure- Cost associated with internal
non-conformance (detected prior to delivery of a
product or service)
•Appraisal- Cost associated with external non-
conformance (detected after delivery of a product
or service)
21. Name of presentation21
Examples of Internal Failure Costs
In Process scrap and rework
Engineering changes (ECN)
Re-inspection after rework
Downgrading
Expediting (Freight)
Terminated projects
23. Name of presentation23
Category Description Example
Engineering
Changes Request
(ECR)
Launched existing product that
needs to be further modified to
meet China market industry
standard requirement (e.g.
Safety emergency button)
Transportation &
Expediting
(Freight)
Product damager due to the
transportation quality incident.
Sometime we can’t fix the
damage part by repairing and will
have to express-ship backup
from factory or warehouse
Stall or Delay On
Job Sites
品不良影响 的 用;产 发货 压车费
返修 品 致吊 等待 用产 导 车 费 ;
Main crane is waiting for Project
start ; And sometimes it takes
some time if many people have
not the solution but different
idea’s
Internal Failure - 2
24. Name of presentation24
Examples of External Failure Costs
Warranty administration
Field repair stock
Product recall and field updates
Customer rejects and returns
Canceling suppliers
Product liability suit
26. Name of presentation26
Category Description Example
Product
Liability Suit
Wind turbine fire accident due to
product design natured failure or
product reliability
Canceling
Suppliers
The lifting supplier company
does not follow Vestas WI to
potentially damage the Nacell
with a decision to cancel this
supplier
External Failure - 2
27. Name of presentation27
Tracking on Monthly Basis
Measure
BU Name:
COQ Details: Plan Plan Plan Plan Plan Plan
Dollars % % Dollars % % Dollars % % Dollars% % Dollars % % Dollars % %
Quality administration
Quality training
Quality assurance system
Product and process qualification
Quality requirement planning
Supplier evaluation & certification
TTL Preventive cost
Incoming inspection
Test equipment calibration & repair
In-process inspection
Final inspection
Process evaluation
In-process testing
Quality assurance testing
Utilities, supplies, products, etc
Quality audits
TTL Appraisal cost
Scrap
Rework
Sorting
Incoming material disposition
Reject disposition
Corrective action evaluation
Re-inspection
TTL internal failure cost
Customer complaint evaluation
Returned goods rework & sorting
Returned goods replacement
Returned good processing
Legal/settlement cost
TTL external cost
TTL Quality Cost
May Jun
ActualActual Actual Actual Actual Actual
Jan Feb Mar Apr
28. Name of presentation28
Crystal COQ Matrix Trend
Scrap $ rate - Crystal
0.131
0.070
0.159
0.200
0.127
0.175
0.000
0.030
0.060
0.090
0.120
0.150
0.180
0.210
0.240
M
ar
Apr
M
ay
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sept
O
ct
N
ov
D
ec
Scrap $ rate Goal
$
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Jan
Feb
M
ar
Apr
M
ay
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sept
O
ct
N
ov
D
ec
Total Yield Goal
Yield - Crystal
0.00%
1.00%
2.00%
3.00%
4.00%
5.00%
Mar Apr May Jun Jul AugSeptOct Nov Dec
0
200000
400000
600000
800000
1000000
1200000
Scrap $ Total COQ % COQ% Goal
Total COQ %&Scrap - Crystal
29. Name of presentation29
0.00%
0.1%
0.2%
0.3%
0.4%
0.5%
0.6%
Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec
Prevention
1.00%
2.00%
3.00%
4.00%
5.00%
Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec
Internal scrap% Internal Goal
Internal&Scrap% -
Crystal
0.00%
0.05%
0.10%
0.15%
0.20%
0.25%
Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec
External
External% - Crystal
0.00%
0.1%
0.2%
0.3%
0.4%
0.5%
0.6%
Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec
Appraisal
Prevention% - Crystal Appraisal% - Crystal
COQ % Trend---Crystal
30. Name of presentation30
Pareto of Broken/Dead Failure Analysis
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
Broken Freq. Out
Range
Scratch Less
adhesive
Short BP low Mix Mis-
alignment
Rotation
Broken and Dead
0.0130
0.0140
0.0150
0.0160
0.0170
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
B/P M/C F/P Weld F/T
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
Broken
at
Conner
Broken
at
m
iddle Handling
Broken
Dead
31. Name of presentation31
Dead/Broken Fish Bone Diagram
Dead/
Broken
MachineManpower
Drop to the ground
Transportation Shock
Material
Chipped Blank
Wrong Handling
Hardness of Base Tabs
Poor Slot roughness of base
Lead Cutter Shock
Ultrasonic Level
of Blank WasherHandling broken
Large Welding
Pressure
Stamping Shock
Method
Unsafe Package
Cement Volume
Mount Rotation
Low viscosity of Adhesive
Product mix
Pattern alignment
insufficient
epoxy amount
Adhesive
contamination
Bubble in epoxy
Slut knife of lead
cutter/former
B/P plate dead
Large spot size
for some model
UM5 shield
with poor edge
Not optimized BP mask
design for MS model
35. Copyright Notice
The documents are created by Vestas Wind Systems A/S and contain copyrighted material, trademarks, and other proprietary information. All rights reserved. No part of the documents may be reproduced or copied in any form or by any
means - such as graphic, electronic, or mechanical, including photocopying, taping, or information storage and retrieval systems without the prior written permission of Vestas Wind Systems A/S. The use of these documents by you, or
anyone else authorized by you, is prohibited unless specifically permitted by Vestas Wind Systems A/S. You may not alter or remove any trademark, copyright or other notice from the documents. The documents are provided “as is” and
Vestas Wind Systems A/S shall not have any responsibility or liability whatsoever for the results of use of the documents by you.
Thank you for your attention