This document compares the limits of safe operation for a continuously stirred tank reactor (CSTR) and a semi-batch reactor (SBR) for an exothermic liquid phase reaction. It outlines the stability criteria used to define the limits for a CSTR based on temperature and conversion. Equations are presented to calculate the critical coolant temperature values corresponding to the multiple steady states, limit cycles, and transition between damped and aperiodic return to the steady state for a CSTR operating at a fixed temperature. The analysis shows that for the same reaction and conditions, an SBR has a more limited range of safe operation than a CSTR.
Heat Capacity of BN and GaN binary semiconductor under high Pressure-Temperat...IOSR Journals
In this paper, we have calculated the molar heat capacity for cubic zinc blende (cZB) BN and GaN binary semiconductors at high pressure-temperature (PT). For the calculation of heat capacity, we firstly obtained the Debye temperature (ϴD) variation with temperature and at higher temperature it becomes constant with temperature in quasi-harmonic approximation limits. We have also calculated the static Debye temperature (ϴD) from elastic constant for the both BN and GaN binary semiconductors. The elastic constants are calculated from the energy-strain relation using plane wave method in DFT approach. All the calculated results are well consistence with experimental and reported data
Heat Capacity of BN and GaN binary semiconductor under high Pressure-Temperat...IOSR Journals
In this paper, we have calculated the molar heat capacity for cubic zinc blende (cZB) BN and GaN binary semiconductors at high pressure-temperature (PT). For the calculation of heat capacity, we firstly obtained the Debye temperature (ϴD) variation with temperature and at higher temperature it becomes constant with temperature in quasi-harmonic approximation limits. We have also calculated the static Debye temperature (ϴD) from elastic constant for the both BN and GaN binary semiconductors. The elastic constants are calculated from the energy-strain relation using plane wave method in DFT approach. All the calculated results are well consistence with experimental and reported data
Natural Convection and Entropy Generation in Γ-Shaped Enclosure Using Lattice...A Behzadmehr
This work presents a numerical analysis of entropy generation in Γ-Shaped enclosure that was submitted to the natural convection process using a simple thermal lattice Boltzmann method (TLBM) with the Boussinesq approximation. A 2D thermal lattice Boltzmann method with 9 velocities, D2Q9, is used to solve the thermal flow problem. The simulations are performed at a constant Prandtl number (Pr = 0.71) and Rayleigh numbers ranging from 103 to 106 at the macroscopic scale (Kn = 10-4). In every case, an appropriate value of the characteristic velocity is chosen using a simple model based on the kinetic theory. By considering the obtained dimensionless velocity and temperature values, the distributions of entropy generation due to heat transfer and fluid friction are determined. It is found that for an enclosure with high value of Rayleigh number (i.e., Ra=105), the total entropy generation due to fluid friction and total Nu number increases with decreasing the aspect ratio.
a detailed description of the chapter chemical kinetics (physical chemistry) including different problems by Dr. Satyabrata Si from KIIT school of biotechnology
Natural Convection and Entropy Generation in Γ-Shaped Enclosure Using Lattice...A Behzadmehr
This work presents a numerical analysis of entropy generation in Γ-Shaped enclosure that was submitted to the natural convection process using a simple thermal lattice Boltzmann method (TLBM) with the Boussinesq approximation. A 2D thermal lattice Boltzmann method with 9 velocities, D2Q9, is used to solve the thermal flow problem. The simulations are performed at a constant Prandtl number (Pr = 0.71) and Rayleigh numbers ranging from 103 to 106 at the macroscopic scale (Kn = 10-4). In every case, an appropriate value of the characteristic velocity is chosen using a simple model based on the kinetic theory. By considering the obtained dimensionless velocity and temperature values, the distributions of entropy generation due to heat transfer and fluid friction are determined. It is found that for an enclosure with high value of Rayleigh number (i.e., Ra=105), the total entropy generation due to fluid friction and total Nu number increases with decreasing the aspect ratio.
a detailed description of the chapter chemical kinetics (physical chemistry) including different problems by Dr. Satyabrata Si from KIIT school of biotechnology
DESIGN, IMPLEMENTATION, AND REAL-TIME SIMULATION OF A CONTROLLER-BASED DECOUP...IAEME Publication
In this paper, dynamic decoupling control design strategies for the MIMO Continuous Stirred Tank Reactor (CSTR) process characterised by nonlinearities, loop interaction and the potentially unstable dynamics, are presented. Simulations of the behavior of the closed loop decoupled system are performed in Matlab/Simulink. Software transformation technique is proposed to build a real-time module of the developed in Matlab/Simulink environment software modules and to transfer it to the real-time environment of TwinCAT 3.1 software of the Beckhoff PLC. The simulation results from the investigations done in Simulink and TwinCAT 3.1 software platforms have shown the suitability and the potentials of the method for design of the decoupling controller and of merging the Matlab/Simulink control function blocks into the TwinCAT 3.1 function blocks in real-time. The merits derived from such integration imply that the existing software and its components can be re-used. The paper contributes to implementation of the industrial requirements for portability and interoperability of the PLC software.
Design of a self tuning regulator for temperature control of a polymerization...ISA Interchange
The temperature control of a polymerization reactor described by Chylla and Haase, a control engineering benchmark problem, is used to illustrate the potential of adaptive control design by employing a self-tuning regulator concept. In the benchmark scenario, the operation of the reactor must be guaranteed under various disturbing influences, e.g., changing ambient temperatures or impurity of the monomer. The conventional cascade control provides a robust operation, but often lacks in control performance concerning the required strict temperature tolerances. The self-tuning control concept presented in this contribution solves the problem. This design calculates a trajectory for the cooling jacket temperature in order to follow a predefined trajectory of the reactor temperature. The reaction heat and the heat transfer coefficient in the energy balance are estimated online by using an unscented Kalman filter (UKF). Two simple physically motivated relations are employed, which allow the non-delayed estimation of both quantities. Simulation results under model uncertainties show the effectiveness of the self-tuning control concept.
Smart TV Buyer Insights Survey 2024 by 91mobiles.pdf91mobiles
91mobiles recently conducted a Smart TV Buyer Insights Survey in which we asked over 3,000 respondents about the TV they own, aspects they look at on a new TV, and their TV buying preferences.
Essentials of Automations: Optimizing FME Workflows with ParametersSafe Software
Are you looking to streamline your workflows and boost your projects’ efficiency? Do you find yourself searching for ways to add flexibility and control over your FME workflows? If so, you’re in the right place.
Join us for an insightful dive into the world of FME parameters, a critical element in optimizing workflow efficiency. This webinar marks the beginning of our three-part “Essentials of Automation” series. This first webinar is designed to equip you with the knowledge and skills to utilize parameters effectively: enhancing the flexibility, maintainability, and user control of your FME projects.
Here’s what you’ll gain:
- Essentials of FME Parameters: Understand the pivotal role of parameters, including Reader/Writer, Transformer, User, and FME Flow categories. Discover how they are the key to unlocking automation and optimization within your workflows.
- Practical Applications in FME Form: Delve into key user parameter types including choice, connections, and file URLs. Allow users to control how a workflow runs, making your workflows more reusable. Learn to import values and deliver the best user experience for your workflows while enhancing accuracy.
- Optimization Strategies in FME Flow: Explore the creation and strategic deployment of parameters in FME Flow, including the use of deployment and geometry parameters, to maximize workflow efficiency.
- Pro Tips for Success: Gain insights on parameterizing connections and leveraging new features like Conditional Visibility for clarity and simplicity.
We’ll wrap up with a glimpse into future webinars, followed by a Q&A session to address your specific questions surrounding this topic.
Don’t miss this opportunity to elevate your FME expertise and drive your projects to new heights of efficiency.
GDG Cloud Southlake #33: Boule & Rebala: Effective AppSec in SDLC using Deplo...James Anderson
Effective Application Security in Software Delivery lifecycle using Deployment Firewall and DBOM
The modern software delivery process (or the CI/CD process) includes many tools, distributed teams, open-source code, and cloud platforms. Constant focus on speed to release software to market, along with the traditional slow and manual security checks has caused gaps in continuous security as an important piece in the software supply chain. Today organizations feel more susceptible to external and internal cyber threats due to the vast attack surface in their applications supply chain and the lack of end-to-end governance and risk management.
The software team must secure its software delivery process to avoid vulnerability and security breaches. This needs to be achieved with existing tool chains and without extensive rework of the delivery processes. This talk will present strategies and techniques for providing visibility into the true risk of the existing vulnerabilities, preventing the introduction of security issues in the software, resolving vulnerabilities in production environments quickly, and capturing the deployment bill of materials (DBOM).
Speakers:
Bob Boule
Robert Boule is a technology enthusiast with PASSION for technology and making things work along with a knack for helping others understand how things work. He comes with around 20 years of solution engineering experience in application security, software continuous delivery, and SaaS platforms. He is known for his dynamic presentations in CI/CD and application security integrated in software delivery lifecycle.
Gopinath Rebala
Gopinath Rebala is the CTO of OpsMx, where he has overall responsibility for the machine learning and data processing architectures for Secure Software Delivery. Gopi also has a strong connection with our customers, leading design and architecture for strategic implementations. Gopi is a frequent speaker and well-known leader in continuous delivery and integrating security into software delivery.
Key Trends Shaping the Future of Infrastructure.pdfCheryl Hung
Keynote at DIGIT West Expo, Glasgow on 29 May 2024.
Cheryl Hung, ochery.com
Sr Director, Infrastructure Ecosystem, Arm.
The key trends across hardware, cloud and open-source; exploring how these areas are likely to mature and develop over the short and long-term, and then considering how organisations can position themselves to adapt and thrive.
Let's dive deeper into the world of ODC! Ricardo Alves (OutSystems) will join us to tell all about the new Data Fabric. After that, Sezen de Bruijn (OutSystems) will get into the details on how to best design a sturdy architecture within ODC.
The Art of the Pitch: WordPress Relationships and SalesLaura Byrne
Clients don’t know what they don’t know. What web solutions are right for them? How does WordPress come into the picture? How do you make sure you understand scope and timeline? What do you do if sometime changes?
All these questions and more will be explored as we talk about matching clients’ needs with what your agency offers without pulling teeth or pulling your hair out. Practical tips, and strategies for successful relationship building that leads to closing the deal.
Kubernetes & AI - Beauty and the Beast !?! @KCD Istanbul 2024Tobias Schneck
As AI technology is pushing into IT I was wondering myself, as an “infrastructure container kubernetes guy”, how get this fancy AI technology get managed from an infrastructure operational view? Is it possible to apply our lovely cloud native principals as well? What benefit’s both technologies could bring to each other?
Let me take this questions and provide you a short journey through existing deployment models and use cases for AI software. On practical examples, we discuss what cloud/on-premise strategy we may need for applying it to our own infrastructure to get it to work from an enterprise perspective. I want to give an overview about infrastructure requirements and technologies, what could be beneficial or limiting your AI use cases in an enterprise environment. An interactive Demo will give you some insides, what approaches I got already working for real.
Transcript: Selling digital books in 2024: Insights from industry leaders - T...BookNet Canada
The publishing industry has been selling digital audiobooks and ebooks for over a decade and has found its groove. What’s changed? What has stayed the same? Where do we go from here? Join a group of leading sales peers from across the industry for a conversation about the lessons learned since the popularization of digital books, best practices, digital book supply chain management, and more.
Link to video recording: https://bnctechforum.ca/sessions/selling-digital-books-in-2024-insights-from-industry-leaders/
Presented by BookNet Canada on May 28, 2024, with support from the Department of Canadian Heritage.
Connector Corner: Automate dynamic content and events by pushing a buttonDianaGray10
Here is something new! In our next Connector Corner webinar, we will demonstrate how you can use a single workflow to:
Create a campaign using Mailchimp with merge tags/fields
Send an interactive Slack channel message (using buttons)
Have the message received by managers and peers along with a test email for review
But there’s more:
In a second workflow supporting the same use case, you’ll see:
Your campaign sent to target colleagues for approval
If the “Approve” button is clicked, a Jira/Zendesk ticket is created for the marketing design team
But—if the “Reject” button is pushed, colleagues will be alerted via Slack message
Join us to learn more about this new, human-in-the-loop capability, brought to you by Integration Service connectors.
And...
Speakers:
Akshay Agnihotri, Product Manager
Charlie Greenberg, Host
Dev Dives: Train smarter, not harder – active learning and UiPath LLMs for do...UiPathCommunity
💥 Speed, accuracy, and scaling – discover the superpowers of GenAI in action with UiPath Document Understanding and Communications Mining™:
See how to accelerate model training and optimize model performance with active learning
Learn about the latest enhancements to out-of-the-box document processing – with little to no training required
Get an exclusive demo of the new family of UiPath LLMs – GenAI models specialized for processing different types of documents and messages
This is a hands-on session specifically designed for automation developers and AI enthusiasts seeking to enhance their knowledge in leveraging the latest intelligent document processing capabilities offered by UiPath.
Speakers:
👨🏫 Andras Palfi, Senior Product Manager, UiPath
👩🏫 Lenka Dulovicova, Product Program Manager, UiPath
"Impact of front-end architecture on development cost", Viktor TurskyiFwdays
I have heard many times that architecture is not important for the front-end. Also, many times I have seen how developers implement features on the front-end just following the standard rules for a framework and think that this is enough to successfully launch the project, and then the project fails. How to prevent this and what approach to choose? I have launched dozens of complex projects and during the talk we will analyze which approaches have worked for me and which have not.
Neuro-symbolic is not enough, we need neuro-*semantic*Frank van Harmelen
Neuro-symbolic (NeSy) AI is on the rise. However, simply machine learning on just any symbolic structure is not sufficient to really harvest the gains of NeSy. These will only be gained when the symbolic structures have an actual semantics. I give an operational definition of semantics as “predictable inference”.
All of this illustrated with link prediction over knowledge graphs, but the argument is general.
Knowledge engineering: from people to machines and back
Comparison of sbr_and_cstr
1. Chemical Engineering Science. Vol. 41, No. 4. pp. 1081-1087. 1986. 0009-2509/86 $3.00 + 0.00
Printed in Great Britain. @ 1986. Pergamon Press Ltd.
A COMPARISON OF THE LIMITS OF SAFE OPERATION OF A SER AND A CSTR
P. Hugo* and J. Steinbach**
*Institut fur Technische Chemie, Technische Universitat Berlin,
StraRe des 17. Juni 135, 1000 Berlin 12
**Schering AG, Abt. APC, MullerstraBe 170-178, 1000 Berlin 66
Federal Republic of Germany
ABSTRACT
In the case of exothermal reactions it is necessary to calculate the limits of safe operation
from stability criteria. In their general form these criteria are often difficult to apply in
practice. _
However, under industrial conditions the temperature of a reaction is usually fixed. Unter these
conditions from the stability criteria a corresponding limit of the coolant temperature can be
calculated. For safe operation the actual coolant temperature must be chosen higher than this
limit value.
Using the well known criteria of a CSTR the principles of these calculations are demonstrated.
Using empirical stability criteria of a SBR similar calculations can be performed. Taking the
same reaction and reaction conditions the SBR is more critical than the CSTR.
KEYWORDS
CSTR; Semi-Batch-Reactor(SBR); thermal stability; safe operation conditions; critical coolant
temperature.
MODEL ASSUMPTION
The aim of this paper is to compare the limits of safe operation of a CSTR and a Semi-Batch-Reac-
tor (SBR). The problems are discussed for a special case of a liquid phase reaction of the type:
A + B = Products
with a rate law
r = k(T)CA cB k(T) = k, exp(-E/RT) (la,b)
The reaction may be carried out with or without solvent S. All products formed by the reaction
remain in solution. A stoichiometric input of A and B is assumed.
Under these conditions the density P and the heat capacity cP remain nearly constant during the
reaction.
LIMITS OF STABILITY OF A CSTR
Stability Criteria
The stability criteria of an indirectly cooled CSTR are well known; see Perlmutter (1972). They
define the limits of safe operation. It is convenient to describe these limits using dimension-
less groups as defined In Table 1. CBo is the virtual initial concentration of B, to be CalCUlat-
ed from the input rate mg by CB, = mBr/MBY.
From the discussion of the dynamic behavior of the balance equations of an indirectly cooled CSTR
three limits can be obtained:
a) Multiple stady states with ignition/extinction(denoted by the index B):
Bg = (1 + St) r (l/S) + 2/(1 - 3) ] (2)
If the actual thermal reaction number B > Ba there are multiple steady States.
1081
2. 1082 P. HLJCXJandJ. STEINBACH K-3
TABLE 1 Definitions and Dimensionless Groups
Conversion 3 = 1 - (c&c&o)
Adiabatic temperature rise ATad = (-~H)Cgo/~cp
Damkohler number Da = k CBo T
Thermal reaction number B = E ATad/RTZ
Modified Stanton number St = kw Ar/Vpcp
(Westerterp and co-workers, 1984)
b) Limit cycles of temperature and conversion (denoted by the index a):
6, = [z + St + 23/(1 - 3)] /3 (3)
A limit cycle is obtained in the range B6 > B > B,.
c) For real but stable eigen values a CSTR can return from small disturbations to the stationary
state either with damped oscillations or aperiodically.The limit between these two cases
(denoted by the index 0) is:
Bw = [-/x - 4 23/(l - 3)]'/3 (4)
If B < Bw; the return is aperiodic.
To apply these equations the conversion 3 must be calculated. For a reaction with a rate law (1)
3= [I -31 -Q']/Q Q = 2 Da/(t + 2 Da) (5a,b)
Critical Coolant Temperature
From the Eq.(2),(3),(4)and(5a,b) the conversion and temperature at the three limits can be cal-
culated. This is, however, somewhat troublesome because B and Da both depend on temperature.
This problem can be avoided. Under industrial conditions the temperature at which the reaction is
to be performed is usually fixed. So in practice the question is how to find the other reaction
conditions for a sufficiently safe operation at the prescribed temperature T.
The most important parameter for controlling the reaction temperature is the coolant temperature
Tc- For simplicity we assume that the input temperature of A, B and of the solvent S is equal to
the coolant temperature. At the stationary state the coolant temperature of a CSTR can be calcu-
lated by:
Tc = T - ATad3/(1 f St) (6a)
Using the definition of B from Table 1
T, = T [1 - (RT/E) B3/(1 + St)] (Sb)
So, inserting the critical values of B from the Eq.(2), (3) and (4) three corresponding critical
values of the coolant temperature T,, Tg, T, can be calculated. Comparing these values with the
actual coolant temperature T, the range of dynamic behavior of a CSTR can be determined as shown
in Table 2.
TABLE 2 Ranges of Dynamics of a CSTR
Range Coolant Temperature T, Type of Dynamics
AS Tc ' Tw Aperiodic stable
PS Tw > T, > Ta Periodic stable
LC Ta ' T, > TB Limit cycles
IE TB ' Tc Ignition/extinction
3. K-3 Safe operation of a SBR and a CSTR 1083
Independent Reaction and Reactor Parameters
The dimensionless groups of Table 1 contain several reaction and reactor parameters within one
group. Under the conditions described in Section 1 three reaction and reactor conditions can be
changed independently:
1) Dilution by solvent x= (i, + i,)/i (7)
2) Reactor size Y = VPcp/(kwA*,) (8)
3) Input rate z= = 1/r (9)
In these equations ~1 = 1 hour is the chosen time unit. X, Y, Z are defined in such a way that
increasing values will lead to more critical conditions.
The total input is rig = VP/~ = 6~ + r&j + 6s and the stoichiometric input is fs = mB/fi’ = MB/MA-
~A
Using these equations and Eq.(7) the virtual initial concentration CBo = mBz/MB V can be rear-
ranged as:
‘
Bo =
By Eq.(8), (9), (10) the dimensionless groups of Table 1 can be separated into the characteristic
reaction data presented in Table 3 and the variable groups X. Y, Z. The result is
--
ET
/(l + fs) (11)
3 :
B = [ (E/RT)~ fe/(i + fS)] x (12)
St = a (13)
TABLE 3 Characteristic Reaction Data
Denotation Definition Example Values
Stoichiometric factor f, = MB/MA f, = 1.25
Kinetic factor fk = kmpq,/MA In fk = 32.38
Energetic factor f, = R(-AH)/E MBcp f, = 0.0827
Calculations for an Example
Taking the data of Table 3 and E/R = 10000 K some calculations of the different coolant tempera-
tures were carried out. Fig. 1 shows the influence of changing the reactor size Y at fixed X = 1
(i.e. no solvent) and Z = 0.25 (spacetime 4 hours). Only small reactors (Y < 0.50) work in the
stable range.
Fig. 1 Limits of stable operation of a CSTR changing the dimen-
sionless reactor size Y, (X = 1. Z = 0.25); T = 350 K
4. 1084 P. HUGO and J. STEINBACH K-3
Fig. 2 shows the change of input rate Z at fixed X = 1 and Y = 1. Increasing input rate Z Ieads
to limit cycles (range LC) and at very low coolant temperatures to extinction (range IE).
If it is possible to increase the reactor temperature T this is the best way of stabilizing the
reactor. Fig. 3 shows the same conditions as Fig. 1 but at ten degrees higher reaction tempera-
ture.
In the same manner the addition of solvent (i.e. decreasing X) can be discussed. Due to the limit
space of this paper these results are not demonstrated as a figure. In the case of a CSTR the re-
suits for changing X are similar to the changeof 2. Dilution with solvent stabilizes the CSTR.
.m
1IKl
t
Fig. 2 Limits of stable operation of a CSTR vs. the dimen-
sionless input rate Z, (X = 1, Y = 1); T = 350 K
I I
Fig. 3 Limits of stable operation of a CSTR. same conditions
as Fig. 1, but T = 360 K
LIMITS OF SAFE OPERATION OF A SBR
Dynamic Behavior of a SBR
Taking the model assumptions of Section 1 the performance of the SBR is as follows: The component
B with or without solvent S is placed into the reactor at coolant temperature. A is then fed at
constant rate, at the same temperature, up to the stoichiometric ratio. The total time for addi-
tion of A is denoted as T. Due to the heat of reaction there is an increase of the reactor temper-
ature T. The dynamic behavior of this operating condition was investigated in detail by one of us
(Steinbach. 1985). The results are briefly summarized.
If the reaction rate is sufficiently high most of the added component A is immediately converted.
This is a safe operation as shown in Fig. 4. However, if the starting temperature is too low, un-
stable operation results: Fig. 5. The reaction conditions used for simulation are the same as in
Fig. 7. Fig. 4 corresponds to Z = 0.1; Fig. 5 to Z = 0.2.
5. K-3 Safe operation a SBR and a CSTR
of 1085
Fig. 4 Temperatureand molar fraction of a SBR. working
in a safe condition, see Fig. 7:.Z = 0-l
Fig. 5 Temperature and molar fraction of a SBR. working
in an unstable condition, see Fig. 7: Z = 0.2
Limits of Safe Operation of a SBR
A discontinuous process possesses no stationary state. Therefore, a stability analysis similar to
the CSTR cannot be performed. What can be done is to develop empirical correlations from numeri-
cal solutions of the balance equations. This was demonstrated in an earlier paper (Hugo, 1981),
investigatingthe thermal design of a batch-reactor.
To compare the SBR and the CSTR corresponding dimensionless groups have to be used. As the volume
and cooling area increase with time in a SBR, somewhat different definitions must be used:
a) The virtual initial concentration of B is calculated from the input mB and the final volume V:
'Bo = mB/MB V (14)
b) The increase of volume due to the input of mA leads to an additional parameter:
G = mA/m (15)
m = V/pis the total final mass.
c) As an approximation a mean value of the cooling area A is used.
All other definitions are the same for a SBR and a CSTR.
Of course, low values of the thermal reaction number B will lead to a safe operation of the SBR
in any case. From numeric calculations (Steinbach, 1985) we found that the limit of the thermal
reaction number BY can be calculated by:
B Y= [ JSt + 2 G'+ 1.2 ]' (16)
When the actual B exceeds E$ the SBR may become critical, as demonstrated in Fig. 5. To avoid
this, the initial reaction rate at the coolant temperature T, must be sufficiently high. The lim-
it value To can be calculated with sufficient accuracy by the empirical correlation (Steinbach,
1985):
Da (Tb) = St (17)
If the actual coolant temperature T, is greater then Ta the "stable" maximum temperature Tm (see
Fig. 4) can be calculated from
T, = T, ATad
(18)
[ l-G 3
This equation corresponds to Eq.(6a) of the CSTR at 5 = 1.
Desing of a SBR
In a SBR the dilution by solvent is described by
6. 1086 P. HUGO and J. STEINBACH K-3
x=
mAm mB
+ (7a)
and the stoichiometric input iS fs = mB/mA. With these equations the volume increase parameter
can be rearranged as
B=h (19)
The design principle of a SBR corresponds to that of a CSTR. From Eq.(18) one gets:
Tc=Tm Cl- [?I&1 (6~)
Inserting B at T,, the actual coolant temperature is obtained; inserting B, from Eq.(16) the cor-
responding T-,is obtained. If T, > T-,the SBR operates safely: Range ASBR.
safe operation demands Eq.(17). By the general definitions of Da and St given in Eq.
[:lpazdTli3) the corresponding coolant temperature Ta can be calculated as
Tg = (E/R)/ln [fk X Y /(I + fs) ] (17a)
In the range Tr > Tc > Ta a safe operation of the type of Fig. 4 is obtained: Range BSBR.
If T, < T6 the SBR IS unstable: Range DSBR. The last two Fig. 6 and Fig. 7 show the result of a
typical design of the SBR. The fixed data f,, fK, f, and E/R are the same as for the CSTR.
Fig. 6 Limits of safe operation of a SBR changing the dimen-
sionless reactor size Y, (X = 1, Z = 0.15); T = 350 K
Fig. 7 Limits of safe operation of a SBR changing the dimen-
sionless input rate 2. (X = 1, Y = 0.75); T = 350 K
7. K-3 Safeoperation a SBR and a CSTR
of 1087
The conditions for Fig. 6 (SBR) and Fig. 1 (CSTR) are identical with the exception of the input
rate Z. As the Iimit size of safe operation Y = 0.5 is nearly the same, the lower input rate
Z = 0.15 of the SBR (Z = 0.25, CSTR) indicates that the SBR is the more difficult to control.
The same conclusion can be taken from a comparison of Fig. 7 and Fig. 2. Note that the Z-scale
differs in the two figures. Generally, the input rate is a rather critical condition of safe oper-
ation.
So. taking the same reaction and reaction conditions the SBR is more critical than the CSTR. This
is due to the different wav of conversion of the comoonent B. In a CSTR at a stationarv dearee of
conversion the concentratibnof both components A anh B usually is small. In a SBR theFe is a high
initial concentrationof B and a small concentrationof A as shown in Fig. 4. Therefore, critical
conditions can result from a comparativelysmall increase of the feed rate of component A.
REFERENCES
Hugo, P. (1981). Start-up and Operation of Exothermic Batch-Processes.Ger. Chem. Eng..4. 161-173
Perlmutter, D. D. (1972). Stability of Chemical Reactors. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewooa Cliffs,
_. _
Sternbich, J. (1985). Untersuchung zur thermischen Sicherheit des indirekt gekuhlten Semibatch-
Reaktors. Dissertation.Technische Universitat Berlin.
Westerterp, K. R., W. P. M. van Swaaij and A. A. C. M_ Beenackers (1984). Chemical Reactor Design
and Operation. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester. p. 306
NOTATION
c, ATad, Da, B, St: see Table 1
fs, fk, fez see Table 3
Cooling area (mZ)
Heat capacity (J/kg K)
Concentration of component i (mol/m')
Activation enerav (J/mol)
G Volume increase-of‘a.SBR; see Eq.(15)
AH Heat of reaction (J/mol)
k Rate constant (m'/mol h)
kw Heat transfer coefficient (W/m* K)
Mi Molar mass of component i (kg/mol)
?i Total input of component i in a SBR (kg)
mi Input rate of component i in a CSTR (kg/h)
R Gas constant, 8.314 J/mol K
7 Temperature, K
V Volume of reaction phase (ma)
x. Y, z Dimensionless reaction conditions, Ea.(7), (8). (9)
_..
6 Density (kg/m')
T Space time (CSTR) or time of dosage (SBR). (h)