This document provides information on community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). It defines CAP and distinguishes it from other types of pneumonia. It then discusses the epidemiology, clinical presentation, etiology, symptoms, diagnosis, treatment, and antibiotic resistance patterns associated with CAP. Key points include that CAP affects millions annually in the US with high costs, accurate diagnosis and treatment is important to reduce mortality, and resistance to commonly used antibiotics is a concern.
Pneumonia lecture,Describe the common pathogenesis and pathogens of pneumonia
Discuss diagnosis and initial management of community acquired pneumonia (CAP)
Understand features of the Pneumonia PORT Severity Index
Discuss the IDSA/ATS guidelines and recommendations for final antibiotic choice
Understand issues in basic management for pneumonia in children, nursing home patients, and immunocompromised patients.
Pneumonia - Community Acquired Pneumonia (CAP)Arshia Nozari
An overview to Community Acquired Pneumonia; It's Pathophysiology, Etiology, Epidemiology, Diagnosis and Treatment according to Harrison's Internal Medicine, 20th Edition (2018).
Pneumonia lecture,Describe the common pathogenesis and pathogens of pneumonia
Discuss diagnosis and initial management of community acquired pneumonia (CAP)
Understand features of the Pneumonia PORT Severity Index
Discuss the IDSA/ATS guidelines and recommendations for final antibiotic choice
Understand issues in basic management for pneumonia in children, nursing home patients, and immunocompromised patients.
Pneumonia - Community Acquired Pneumonia (CAP)Arshia Nozari
An overview to Community Acquired Pneumonia; It's Pathophysiology, Etiology, Epidemiology, Diagnosis and Treatment according to Harrison's Internal Medicine, 20th Edition (2018).
Contains 17 clinical situations of prolonged fever and discussion of various differential diagnosis based on them. Also gives the key points in the diagnosis of a prototype diagnosis and the usefulness of a relevant investigation modality in identifying these conditions. This power point presentaion is based on the chapter in Harrison's Text Book on Internal Medicine chapter on Fever of Unknown Origin
Fever and Hyperthermia and Pyrexia of unknown origin by Dr Mohammad Hussien for Medical Student .
Ass.Lecturer of Hepatogastroentrology at Kafrelsheikh University.
Non-typhoidal Salmonellosis, is one of the most common and widely distributed foodborne diseases, with tens of millions of human cases occurring worldwide every year.
In the United States, the incidence of NTS infection has doubled in the past 2 decades.
In 2009 there were 14 million cases of NTS.
Pyrexia of unknown origin (PUO) may be defined as any febrile illness (temperature greater than 38°C) lasting 3 weeks or longer, without any obvious cause and failure to reach a diagnosis despite one week of inpatient investigation.
In these conditions there is thus a special need for a lab diagnosis
to guide the choice of
appropriate therapy.
Fever ≥ 38.3°C (>101°F) on several occasions
These lecture notes were prepared by Dr. Hamdi Turkey- Pulmonologist- Department of internal medicine - Taiz university
Do Not Forget To Visit Our Pages On Facebook on the following Links:
https://www.facebook.com/groups/569435236444761/
AND
https://www.facebook.com/groups/690331650977113/
Contains 17 clinical situations of prolonged fever and discussion of various differential diagnosis based on them. Also gives the key points in the diagnosis of a prototype diagnosis and the usefulness of a relevant investigation modality in identifying these conditions. This power point presentaion is based on the chapter in Harrison's Text Book on Internal Medicine chapter on Fever of Unknown Origin
Fever and Hyperthermia and Pyrexia of unknown origin by Dr Mohammad Hussien for Medical Student .
Ass.Lecturer of Hepatogastroentrology at Kafrelsheikh University.
Non-typhoidal Salmonellosis, is one of the most common and widely distributed foodborne diseases, with tens of millions of human cases occurring worldwide every year.
In the United States, the incidence of NTS infection has doubled in the past 2 decades.
In 2009 there were 14 million cases of NTS.
Pyrexia of unknown origin (PUO) may be defined as any febrile illness (temperature greater than 38°C) lasting 3 weeks or longer, without any obvious cause and failure to reach a diagnosis despite one week of inpatient investigation.
In these conditions there is thus a special need for a lab diagnosis
to guide the choice of
appropriate therapy.
Fever ≥ 38.3°C (>101°F) on several occasions
These lecture notes were prepared by Dr. Hamdi Turkey- Pulmonologist- Department of internal medicine - Taiz university
Do Not Forget To Visit Our Pages On Facebook on the following Links:
https://www.facebook.com/groups/569435236444761/
AND
https://www.facebook.com/groups/690331650977113/
Diagnosis & Mangement of Community-Acquired Pneumonia, Hospital Acquired Pneu...Riaz Rahman
Clinical overview of Community Acquired Pneumonia, Hospital Acquired Pneumonia, Aspiration Pneumonia. Covers pathophysiology, clinical management, prevention, risk stratification (pneumonia severity index), prognostic factors, complications. Includes case studies, comprehension questions. Given at Jackson Park Medical Center on 12/1/2013. Includes references.
Common Respiratory Manifstation of HIV. As CD 4 count has been diminished there are multiple other oppertynistic infection has occured.
kajsdglsfhoiesyflksd kfnlsfhlsdf ;kSFJKSHASFIO KSDFH;SFHOWEIF KSJHFHYFOWIEF SKC;JHahf kasjhahf kasjnkajfhow kasjhcaosfh aksjfh oiasc oash kashck askhkasjoqwih oashalshasn oashaslhas as,makshcashkjs askn kasnasladsncaskdhoid kasdhoawhdas
Tom Selleck Health: A Comprehensive Look at the Iconic Actor’s Wellness Journeygreendigital
Tom Selleck, an enduring figure in Hollywood. has captivated audiences for decades with his rugged charm, iconic moustache. and memorable roles in television and film. From his breakout role as Thomas Magnum in Magnum P.I. to his current portrayal of Frank Reagan in Blue Bloods. Selleck's career has spanned over 50 years. But beyond his professional achievements. fans have often been curious about Tom Selleck Health. especially as he has aged in the public eye.
Follow us on: Pinterest
Introduction
Many have been interested in Tom Selleck health. not only because of his enduring presence on screen but also because of the challenges. and lifestyle choices he has faced and made over the years. This article delves into the various aspects of Tom Selleck health. exploring his fitness regimen, diet, mental health. and the challenges he has encountered as he ages. We'll look at how he maintains his well-being. the health issues he has faced, and his approach to ageing .
Early Life and Career
Childhood and Athletic Beginnings
Tom Selleck was born on January 29, 1945, in Detroit, Michigan, and grew up in Sherman Oaks, California. From an early age, he was involved in sports, particularly basketball. which played a significant role in his physical development. His athletic pursuits continued into college. where he attended the University of Southern California (USC) on a basketball scholarship. This early involvement in sports laid a strong foundation for his physical health and disciplined lifestyle.
Transition to Acting
Selleck's transition from an athlete to an actor came with its physical demands. His first significant role in "Magnum P.I." required him to perform various stunts and maintain a fit appearance. This role, which he played from 1980 to 1988. necessitated a rigorous fitness routine to meet the show's demands. setting the stage for his long-term commitment to health and wellness.
Fitness Regimen
Workout Routine
Tom Selleck health and fitness regimen has evolved. adapting to his changing roles and age. During his "Magnum, P.I." days. Selleck's workouts were intense and focused on building and maintaining muscle mass. His routine included weightlifting, cardiovascular exercises. and specific training for the stunts he performed on the show.
Selleck adjusted his fitness routine as he aged to suit his body's needs. Today, his workouts focus on maintaining flexibility, strength, and cardiovascular health. He incorporates low-impact exercises such as swimming, walking, and light weightlifting. This balanced approach helps him stay fit without putting undue strain on his joints and muscles.
Importance of Flexibility and Mobility
In recent years, Selleck has emphasized the importance of flexibility and mobility in his fitness regimen. Understanding the natural decline in muscle mass and joint flexibility with age. he includes stretching and yoga in his routine. These practices help prevent injuries, improve posture, and maintain mobilit
micro teaching on communication m.sc nursing.pdfAnurag Sharma
Microteaching is a unique model of practice teaching. It is a viable instrument for the. desired change in the teaching behavior or the behavior potential which, in specified types of real. classroom situations, tends to facilitate the achievement of specified types of objectives.
Title: Sense of Taste
Presenter: Dr. Faiza, Assistant Professor of Physiology
Qualifications:
MBBS (Best Graduate, AIMC Lahore)
FCPS Physiology
ICMT, CHPE, DHPE (STMU)
MPH (GC University, Faisalabad)
MBA (Virtual University of Pakistan)
Learning Objectives:
Describe the structure and function of taste buds.
Describe the relationship between the taste threshold and taste index of common substances.
Explain the chemical basis and signal transduction of taste perception for each type of primary taste sensation.
Recognize different abnormalities of taste perception and their causes.
Key Topics:
Significance of Taste Sensation:
Differentiation between pleasant and harmful food
Influence on behavior
Selection of food based on metabolic needs
Receptors of Taste:
Taste buds on the tongue
Influence of sense of smell, texture of food, and pain stimulation (e.g., by pepper)
Primary and Secondary Taste Sensations:
Primary taste sensations: Sweet, Sour, Salty, Bitter, Umami
Chemical basis and signal transduction mechanisms for each taste
Taste Threshold and Index:
Taste threshold values for Sweet (sucrose), Salty (NaCl), Sour (HCl), and Bitter (Quinine)
Taste index relationship: Inversely proportional to taste threshold
Taste Blindness:
Inability to taste certain substances, particularly thiourea compounds
Example: Phenylthiocarbamide
Structure and Function of Taste Buds:
Composition: Epithelial cells, Sustentacular/Supporting cells, Taste cells, Basal cells
Features: Taste pores, Taste hairs/microvilli, and Taste nerve fibers
Location of Taste Buds:
Found in papillae of the tongue (Fungiform, Circumvallate, Foliate)
Also present on the palate, tonsillar pillars, epiglottis, and proximal esophagus
Mechanism of Taste Stimulation:
Interaction of taste substances with receptors on microvilli
Signal transduction pathways for Umami, Sweet, Bitter, Sour, and Salty tastes
Taste Sensitivity and Adaptation:
Decrease in sensitivity with age
Rapid adaptation of taste sensation
Role of Saliva in Taste:
Dissolution of tastants to reach receptors
Washing away the stimulus
Taste Preferences and Aversions:
Mechanisms behind taste preference and aversion
Influence of receptors and neural pathways
Impact of Sensory Nerve Damage:
Degeneration of taste buds if the sensory nerve fiber is cut
Abnormalities of Taste Detection:
Conditions: Ageusia, Hypogeusia, Dysgeusia (parageusia)
Causes: Nerve damage, neurological disorders, infections, poor oral hygiene, adverse drug effects, deficiencies, aging, tobacco use, altered neurotransmitter levels
Neurotransmitters and Taste Threshold:
Effects of serotonin (5-HT) and norepinephrine (NE) on taste sensitivity
Supertasters:
25% of the population with heightened sensitivity to taste, especially bitterness
Increased number of fungiform papillae
These simplified slides by Dr. Sidra Arshad present an overview of the non-respiratory functions of the respiratory tract.
Learning objectives:
1. Enlist the non-respiratory functions of the respiratory tract
2. Briefly explain how these functions are carried out
3. Discuss the significance of dead space
4. Differentiate between minute ventilation and alveolar ventilation
5. Describe the cough and sneeze reflexes
Study Resources:
1. Chapter 39, Guyton and Hall Textbook of Medical Physiology, 14th edition
2. Chapter 34, Ganong’s Review of Medical Physiology, 26th edition
3. Chapter 17, Human Physiology by Lauralee Sherwood, 9th edition
4. Non-respiratory functions of the lungs https://academic.oup.com/bjaed/article/13/3/98/278874
Title: Sense of Smell
Presenter: Dr. Faiza, Assistant Professor of Physiology
Qualifications:
MBBS (Best Graduate, AIMC Lahore)
FCPS Physiology
ICMT, CHPE, DHPE (STMU)
MPH (GC University, Faisalabad)
MBA (Virtual University of Pakistan)
Learning Objectives:
Describe the primary categories of smells and the concept of odor blindness.
Explain the structure and location of the olfactory membrane and mucosa, including the types and roles of cells involved in olfaction.
Describe the pathway and mechanisms of olfactory signal transmission from the olfactory receptors to the brain.
Illustrate the biochemical cascade triggered by odorant binding to olfactory receptors, including the role of G-proteins and second messengers in generating an action potential.
Identify different types of olfactory disorders such as anosmia, hyposmia, hyperosmia, and dysosmia, including their potential causes.
Key Topics:
Olfactory Genes:
3% of the human genome accounts for olfactory genes.
400 genes for odorant receptors.
Olfactory Membrane:
Located in the superior part of the nasal cavity.
Medially: Folds downward along the superior septum.
Laterally: Folds over the superior turbinate and upper surface of the middle turbinate.
Total surface area: 5-10 square centimeters.
Olfactory Mucosa:
Olfactory Cells: Bipolar nerve cells derived from the CNS (100 million), with 4-25 olfactory cilia per cell.
Sustentacular Cells: Produce mucus and maintain ionic and molecular environment.
Basal Cells: Replace worn-out olfactory cells with an average lifespan of 1-2 months.
Bowman’s Gland: Secretes mucus.
Stimulation of Olfactory Cells:
Odorant dissolves in mucus and attaches to receptors on olfactory cilia.
Involves a cascade effect through G-proteins and second messengers, leading to depolarization and action potential generation in the olfactory nerve.
Quality of a Good Odorant:
Small (3-20 Carbon atoms), volatile, water-soluble, and lipid-soluble.
Facilitated by odorant-binding proteins in mucus.
Membrane Potential and Action Potential:
Resting membrane potential: -55mV.
Action potential frequency in the olfactory nerve increases with odorant strength.
Adaptation Towards the Sense of Smell:
Rapid adaptation within the first second, with further slow adaptation.
Psychological adaptation greater than receptor adaptation, involving feedback inhibition from the central nervous system.
Primary Sensations of Smell:
Camphoraceous, Musky, Floral, Pepperminty, Ethereal, Pungent, Putrid.
Odor Detection Threshold:
Examples: Hydrogen sulfide (0.0005 ppm), Methyl-mercaptan (0.002 ppm).
Some toxic substances are odorless at lethal concentrations.
Characteristics of Smell:
Odor blindness for single substances due to lack of appropriate receptor protein.
Behavioral and emotional influences of smell.
Transmission of Olfactory Signals:
From olfactory cells to glomeruli in the olfactory bulb, involving lateral inhibition.
Primitive, less old, and new olfactory systems with different path
- Video recording of this lecture in English language: https://youtu.be/lK81BzxMqdo
- Video recording of this lecture in Arabic language: https://youtu.be/Ve4P0COk9OI
- Link to download the book free: https://nephrotube.blogspot.com/p/nephrotube-nephrology-books.html
- Link to NephroTube website: www.NephroTube.com
- Link to NephroTube social media accounts: https://nephrotube.blogspot.com/p/join-nephrotube-on-social-media.html
Flu Vaccine Alert in Bangalore Karnatakaaddon Scans
As flu season approaches, health officials in Bangalore, Karnataka, are urging residents to get their flu vaccinations. The seasonal flu, while common, can lead to severe health complications, particularly for vulnerable populations such as young children, the elderly, and those with underlying health conditions.
Dr. Vidisha Kumari, a leading epidemiologist in Bangalore, emphasizes the importance of getting vaccinated. "The flu vaccine is our best defense against the influenza virus. It not only protects individuals but also helps prevent the spread of the virus in our communities," he says.
This year, the flu season is expected to coincide with a potential increase in other respiratory illnesses. The Karnataka Health Department has launched an awareness campaign highlighting the significance of flu vaccinations. They have set up multiple vaccination centers across Bangalore, making it convenient for residents to receive their shots.
To encourage widespread vaccination, the government is also collaborating with local schools, workplaces, and community centers to facilitate vaccination drives. Special attention is being given to ensuring that the vaccine is accessible to all, including marginalized communities who may have limited access to healthcare.
Residents are reminded that the flu vaccine is safe and effective. Common side effects are mild and may include soreness at the injection site, mild fever, or muscle aches. These side effects are generally short-lived and far less severe than the flu itself.
Healthcare providers are also stressing the importance of continuing COVID-19 precautions. Wearing masks, practicing good hand hygiene, and maintaining social distancing are still crucial, especially in crowded places.
Protect yourself and your loved ones by getting vaccinated. Together, we can help keep Bangalore healthy and safe this flu season. For more information on vaccination centers and schedules, residents can visit the Karnataka Health Department’s official website or follow their social media pages.
Stay informed, stay safe, and get your flu shot today!
Adv. biopharm. APPLICATION OF PHARMACOKINETICS : TARGETED DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEMSAkankshaAshtankar
MIP 201T & MPH 202T
ADVANCED BIOPHARMACEUTICS & PHARMACOKINETICS : UNIT 5
APPLICATION OF PHARMACOKINETICS : TARGETED DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEMS By - AKANKSHA ASHTANKAR
2. CAP defined
• Pneumonia not acquired in a hospital or a
long-term care facility
– Hospital acquired pneumonia
– Healthcare associated pneumonia: other
healthcare facilities such as nursing homes,
dialysis centers, and outpatient clinics
3. Introduction
• Estimated 5.6 million cases of CAP occur
annually in the United States
• Estimated total annual cost for CAP in the
United States is $8.4 billion
– 92% of cost with inpatient therapy
• Because CAP is the only acute respiratory tract
infection in which there is increased mortality if
antibiotic therapy is delayed, diagnostic and
treatment decisions need to be made accurately
and efficiently
• Mortality rate among hospitalized patients with
CAP varies each year and can reach 35%
4. Epidemiology
• Unclear because few population-based statistics
for CAP alone are available
• Center for Disease Control and Prevention
(CDC) combines pneumonia with influenza
when collecting data on morbidity and mortality
• In 2001, influenza and pneumonia combined
were the 7th
leading cases of death in the U.S.
– Down from 6th
in previous years
• Death rate of 21.8 per 100,000 patients
5. Clinical Presentation
• Pneumonia is an inflammation or
infection of the lungs that causes them to
function abnormally
• Classified as typical or atypical, although
the clinical presentations are often similar
• Several symptoms commonly present in
patients with pneumonia
• Approximately 20-33% of episodes result
in hospitalization
6. Etiology
• Typical: up to 70%
– Usually caused by Streptococcus pneumoniae
• Atypical: 30-40%
– “My Lungs Contain Viruses”
• Mycoplasma pneumoniae
• Legionella pneumophila
• Chlamydia pneumoniae
• Viruses: Influenza, Adenovirus
– May be co-pathogens in other cases
7. Symptoms
• Cough, fever, chills, fatigue, dyspnea, rigors, and
pleuritic chest pain
• Depending on the pathogen, cough may be
persistent and dry, or it may produce sputum
• Other presentations may include headache and
myalgia
• Certain etiologies, such as legionella, also may
produce gastrointestinal symptoms
– Symptoms at presentation are not useful in
distinguishing CAP from respiratory illnesses with
other causes
8. Diagnosis: Physical Examination
• Dullness to percussion of chest, crackles
or rales on auscultation, bronchial breath
sounds, tactile fremitus, and egophany
(“E” to “A” changes)
• Patient may also be tachypneic
• Patients with typical pneumonia are more
likely to present with dyspnea and
bronchial breath sounds on auscultation
9. Diagnosis: Radiography
• CXR (PA and Lateral):
– American Thoracic Society (ATS) guidelines, “all patients with
suspected CAP should have a chest radiograph to establish the
diagnosis and identify complications (pleural effusions,
multilobar disease)”
– Lobar consolidation – more common in typical pneumonia
– Bilateral, diffuse infiltrates – commonly seen in atypical
pneumonia
• However, radiologists cannot reliably differentiate bacterial from
nonbacterial pneumonia on the basis of the radiographic
appearance
– If performed early in the course of the disease, may be negative
• The sensitivity of chest radiography depends greatly on pretest
probability
10. •47-year-old smoker presented after just a few hours of rigors and productive
cough
•Despite clinical signs of right upper zone consolidation, chest x-ray showed
only minor abnormalities
•Empirical therapy for community-acquired pneumonia was begun
11. •12 hours later
•Chest x-ray showed consolidation in the right upper lobe consistent with the
earlier clinical signs
•S. pneumoniae was isolated from blood cultures
•The patient recovered fully
12. Diagnosis: Radiography (cont.)
• CT
– CT scan could be performed in patients with a negative chest
radiograph when there is a high clinical suspicion for
pneumonia
– CT scan, especially high resolution CT (HRCT), is more
sensitive than plain films for the evaluation of interstitial
disease, bilateral disease, cavitation, empyema, and hilar
adenopathy
– This technology is not generally recommended for routine use
because the data for its use in CAP are limited, the cost is high,
and there is no evidence that this improves outcome
– Thus, a chest radiograph is the preferred method for initial
imaging, with CT scan or MRI reserved for further anatomical
definition
13. Diagnosis: Laboratory Tests
• Historically: WBC, sputum cultures, two sets of blood
cultures, and urine antigens
– Sputum samples are adequate in only 52% of patients with
CAP, and only 44 % of those samples contain pathogens
• Likely due to problems with retrieving samples from lower
respiratory tract, previous antibiotics, contamination from upper
airways, or viral etiology
– Positive blood cultures obtained in only 5-10% of patients,
including those with severe disease
• Positive blood culture has no correlation with severity of illness or
outcome
– Current ATS guidelines recommend that patients hospitalized
for suspected CAP receive 2 sets of blood cultures
14. Sensitivity and Specificity of Diagnostic Tests for CAP
Diagnostic tests by pathogen Sensitivity (%) Specificity (%)
Chlamydia
Rapid PCR (sputum, BAL fluid) 30 to 95 > 95
Serology (fourfold rise in serum
and convalescent titers)
10 to 100 -
Sputum culture 10 to 80 > 95
Gram-negative rods
Sputum Gram stain 15 to 100 11 to 100
Haemophilus influenzae, Moraxella catarrhalis,
Pneumoniae
Sputum culture Diagnostic yield 20 to
79*
Diagnostic yield 20 to
79*
Influenza
Rapid DFA (sputum, BAL fluid) 22 to 75 90
Legionella pneumophila
DFA (sputum, BAL fluid) 22 to 75 90
PCR (sputum, BAL fluid) 83 to 100 > 95
Serum acute titer 10 to 27 > 85
Urinary antigen 55 to 90 > 95
Mycoplasma pneumoniae
Antibiotic titers 75 to 95 > 90
Cold agglutinins 50 to 60 -
PCR (sputum, BAL fluid) 30 to 95 > 95
Pneumococcal pneumoniae
Chest radiography (lobar infiltrate) 40† -
Sputum culture Diagnostic yield
20 to 79*
Diagnostic yield 20 to
79*
Sputum Gram stain 15 to 100 11 to 100
Diagnosis and treatment of community-acquired pneumonia: Am Fam
Physician. 2006 Feb 1;73(3):442-50.
15. Treatment
• Initial treatment of CAP is based on physical
examination findings, laboratory results, and patient
characteristics
– Age, chronic illnesses, smoking history, history of the illness
• Therapy for pneumonia is empiric because specific
pathogens usually are not identified at the time treatment
is initiated
• Physicians should begin their treatment decisions by
assessing the need for hospitalization using a prediction
tool for increased mortality, combined with clinical
judgment
– Pneumonia Severity Index
16. Pneumonia Severity Index (PSI)
• PSI was derived and validated as part of the Pneumonia
Patient Outcomes Research Team (PORT) prospective
cohort study for the purpose of identifying patients with
CAP at low risk for mortality
– The Pneumonia PORT prediction rule used a derivation cohort
of 14,199 inpatients with CAP; it was independently validated
in 38,039 inpatients with CAP and in 2,287 inpatients and
outpatients prospectively
– The PSI rule stratified adults with radiographic evidence of
pneumonia into five classes for risk of death from all causes
within 30 days of presentation
• One limitation in the derivation of this rule was that it
included mostly patients seen in a hospital emergency
department, and included few outpatients who were
evaluated in a physician's office and sent home
17. Demographics
Male Age (years)
Female Age (years) − 10
Nursing home resident + 10
Comorbid illness
Neoplastic disease + 30
Liver disease + 20
Congestive heart failure + 10
Cerebrovascular disease + 10
Renal disease + 10
Physical examination findings
Altered mental status + 20
Respiratory rate > 30 breaths per minute + 20
Systolic blood pressure < 90 mm Hg + 20
Temperature < 35˚C (95˚F) or > 40˚C (104˚F) + 15
Pulse rate > 125 beats per minute + 10
Laboratory and radiographic findings
Arterial pH < 7.35 + 30
Blood urea nitrogen > 64 mg per dL (22.85 mmol
per L)
+ 20
Sodium < 130 mEq per L (130 mmol per L) + 20
Glucose > 250 mg per dL (13.87 mmol per L) + 10
Hematocrit < 30 percent + 10
Partial pressure of arterial oxygen < 60 mm Hg or
oxygen percent saturation < 90 percent
+ 10
Pleural effusion + 10
Pneumonia Severity Index (PSI)
Point total
Risk
R
i
s
k
c
l
a
s
s
Recommended site
of care
No predictors Low I Outpatient
≤ 70 Low I
I
Outpatient
71 to 90 Low I
I
I
Inpatient (briefly)
91 to 130 Moderate I
V
Inpatient
> 130 High V Inpatient
18. Treatment: Outpatient vs. Inpatient
• Choosing between outpatient and inpatient
treatment is a crucial decision because of the
possible risk of death
• Decision influences diagnostic testing and
medication choices, as well as a psychological
impact on patients and families
• Average cost
– Inpatient: $7,500
– Outpatient: $150-350
• Based on age, co-morbidities, and the severity of
presenting disease
19. Treatment: Outpatient vs. Inpatient
(cont.)
• Physicians tend to overestimate a patient’s risk
of death; many low-risk patients could be treated
safely as outpatients
• By using Pneumonia Severity Index (PSI), 26-
31% of hospitalized patients were good
outpatient candidates
– An additional 13-19% only needed brief hospital
observation
• PSI can serve as a general guideline, clinical
judgment should always supersede prognostic
score
20. Pharmacotherapy: Outpatient
• Consensus guidelines
– ATS, Infectious Disease Society of America, and Canadian Guidelines
for the Initial Management of Community-Acquired Pneumonia
• Empiric oral therapy with macrolides, doxycycline, or an
oral beta lactam (amoxicillin, cefuroxime [ceftin], or
amoxicillin/clavulanate [augmentin]), or a
flouroquinolone
– Therapeutic Working Group of the CDC
• Use flouroquinolones sparingly because of resistance concerns
• Duration of therapy
– S. pneumoniae: 7-10 days or until afebrile 3 days
• Bacteremic: 10-14 days
– Mycoplasma/Chlamydia pneumoniae: 10-14 days, up to 21 days
– Legionella: 10-21 days
21. Pharmacotherapy: Outpatient
(cont.)
• Several classes of antibiotics are effective against atypical
pathogens
• C. pneumoniae and Legionella species are intracellular
organisms and M. pneumoniae lacks a cell wall, beta
lactams are not effective
– Erythromycin and tetracycline have been traditional choices for
atypical CAP
– Newer macrolides (azithromycin [zithromax] and
clarithromycin [biaxin]) have good atypical activity and are
generally are better tolerated than erythromycin
– Doxycycline (Vibramcyin) is effective, associated with fewer
gastrointestinal side effects, and is a less expensive alternative
– Flouroquinolones have demonstrated excellent activity against
atypicals and have one-daily dosing and excellent bioavailability
22. Pharmacotherapy: Outpatient
(cont.)
• The Sanford Guide to Antimicrobial
Therapy 2006 – 36th
Ed.
– CAP, not hospitalized, no comorbidities*
• Azithro 0.5g PO x 1, then 0.25g PO QD
• Azithro-ER 2g x 1 (2g /60mL single dose bottle)
• Clarithro 500mg PO BID
• Clarithro-ER 1g PO Q24h
• Doxy 100mg PO BID
* Alcoholism, bronchiectasis, COPD, IVDU, Post-
CVA aspiration, post-obstruction of bronchi,
post-viral
23. Pharmacotherapy: Outpatient
(cont.)
• The Sanford Guide to Antimicrobial
Therapy 2006 – 36th
Ed.
– CAP, not hospitalized, with comorbidities
• Respiratory flouroquinolone
– Gati 400mg PO q24h, Gemi 320mg PO q24h, Levo
750mg PO q24h, Moxi 400mg PO q24h
• Telithro 800mg PO q24h
• Azithro/Clarithro + HD Amox, HD AM-CL,
cefdinir, cefpodoxime, cefprozil
24. Pharmacotherapy: Inpatient
• Antibiotic therapy should be initiated within 4
hours of hospitalization
• Intravenous beta lactam (cefotaxime [claforan]
or ceftriaxone [rocephin]) plus a macrolide or a
combination of ampicillin/sulbactam (unasyn)
plus a macrolide or a fluoroquinolone alone
• After clinically stable (T<100.0, HR<100,
RR<24, SBP>90, O2 sat>90%) and able to
tolerate oral intake, may be switched to oral
antibiotics for remainder of therapy
– Save money, earlier discharge, minimizes risk of
nosocomial infections
25. Pharmacotherapy: Inpatient (cont.)
• The Sanford Guide to Antimicrobial
Therapy 2006 – 36th
Ed.
– CAP, hospitalized, NOT in ICU, no
comorbidities
• Ceftriaxone 2g IV q24h + Azithro 500mg IV
q24h
– Age >65: Ceftriaxone 1g IV q24h
– CAP, hospitalized, NOT in ICU,
comorbidities
• Gati 400mg IV q24h, Levo 750mg IV q24h, Moxi
400mg IV q24h
26.
27. Flouroquinolones
• Conservative use is recommended to
minimize resistance patterns
• New flouroquinolones (levofloxacin,
gatifloxacin, moxifloxacin) should be used
only when patients have failed
recommended first-line regimens, are
allergic to alternative agents, or have a
documented infection with highly drug-
resistant pneumococci
28. Pneumococcal Resistance
• S. pneumoniae accounts for 60-70% of all bacterial
CAP
– Affects all patient groups and can be fatal
• Alarming rate of resistance to many commonly
used antibiotics
– PCN uncommon before 1990
• Resistance classified as intermediate or high-
level
– Intermediate: 28%
– High-level: 16%
• Nation-wide
29. Patterns of Resistance to Antibiotics in North America
Antibiotic
Resistance
(%)
Penicillins
Amoxicillin/clavulanate (Augmentin) 4.1
Penicillin 21.3
Cephalosporins
Cefepime (Maxipime) 0.4
Cefprozil (Cefzil) 23.9
Ceftriaxone (Rocephin) 1.9
Cefuroxime (Ceftin) 24.7
Macrolides
Azithromycin (Zithromax) 23.0
Clarithromycin (Biaxin) 26.6
Erythromycin 28.3
Fluoroquinolones
Gatifloxacin (Tequin) 0.7
Levofloxacin (Levaquin) 0.7
Moxifloxacin (Avelox) 0.4
Miscellaneous
Clindamycin (Cleocin) 9.2
Tetracycline 18.8
Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (Bactrim,
Septra)
29.9
Vancomycin (Vancocin) 0.0
•Antibiotics tested against
Streptococcus pneumoniae
isolates
•Resistance rates averaged
across all patient groups
30. Cost-effective Care
• When choosing a treatment, it is essential
to compare costs and outcomes of all
recommended drug therapies
• Evaluation should lead to a decision that
will maximize the value of health care
services, not simply reduce the costs of
drug therapy
– Overall cost of each therapy should be
obtained by comparing the end cost with the
probability of achieving a positive outcome
31. Antimicrobial Therapies for CAP
Agent Dosage
Cost per course
(generic) Common adverse reactions
Cefotaxime (Claforan)
Cefpodoxime (Vantin)
Cefprozil (Cefzil)
Ceftriaxone (Rocephin)
Cefuroxime (Ceftin)
1 g IV every six to eight hours
200 mg orally twice per day
500 mg orally twice per day
1 g IV every 24 hours
500 mg orally twice per day
0.75 to 1.5 g IV every eight hours
$355 (330)
124 (110)
192
392
219 oral
250 to 358 IV
Mild diarrhea
Rash
Clindamycin (Cleocin) 300 mg orally every six hours
600 mg IV every eight hours
238 (148 to 168) oral
250 IV
Mild diarrhea
Abdominal pain
Pseudomembranous colitis
Rash
Gatifloxacin (Tequin)
Levofloxacin (Levaquin)
Moxifloxacin (Avelox)
400 mg orally or IV once per day
500 mg orally or IV once per day
400 mg orally once per day
98 oral, 382 IV
56 oral, 438 IV
107
Mild diarrhea
Nausea
Vomiting
Constipation
Dizziness
Headache
Azithromycin (Zithromax)
Clarithromycin (Biaxin)
Erythromycin
500 mg orally for one dose, then
250 mg once per day for four doses
500 mg IV every 24 hours
500 mg orally twice per day
500 mg orally every six hours
500 to 1,000 mg IV every six hours
49 to 60 oral
295 IV
96
17 (8 to 10) oral
(167) IV
Mild diarrhea
Nausea
Vomiting
Abdominal pain
Rash
Amoxicillin
Amoxicillin/clavulanate
(Augmentin)
Penicillin G
Penicillin V
500 mg orally every eight hours
875 mg orally every 12 hours
875 mg/125mg orally every 12
hours
1 to 3 mU IV every four hours
500 mg orally four times per day
4 (4 to 8)
20 (18 to 19)
166 (110 to 115)
(273)
15 (9 to 15)
Mild diarrhea
Nausea
Vomiting
Rash
Doxycycline (Vibramycin) 100 mg orally twice per day 102 (16 to 21) Mild diarrhea
Nausea
Vomiting
Phototoxicity
32. Prevention
• More people die from pneumococcal infections (an
estimated 40,000 annually in the United States) than
from any other vaccine preventable disease
• PPV23 is recommended for all adults ≥65 years of age
and in younger patients with a number of conditions
that increase the risk of invasive pneumococcal disease
– Adults who have been diagnosed with invasive pneumococcal
disease should also be vaccinated because infection with one
serotype does not necessarily provide protection against other
serotypes
• A single revaccination is recommended in adults ≥65
years of age if they were vaccinated more than 5 years
previously at a time when they were <65 years of age,
and in immunocompromised patients five years or more
after the first dose