KAHULUGAN AT KAHALAGAHAN NG GAWAING PANSIBIKO.pptx
Communication In Cyberspace
1. Danube University Krems
Centre for E-Government, Peter Parycek
18/03/2022
Communicationin Cyberspace:
DoesinterconnectedMassCommunication
leadto abetter Democracy?
PeterParycek, Danube UniversityKrems
larskflem
9. Danube University Krems
Centre for E-Government, Peter Parycek
18/03/2022
„Wewereapropagandaarmofourgovernments.At thestartthe censors enforcedthat,
butbythe endwewere ourowncensors.Wewere cheerleaders.”CharlesLynch
http://goo.gl/TaOTG
16. Danube University Krems
Centre for E-Government, Peter Parycek
18/03/2022
New Paradigm…
Nobody owns it
Everybody uses it
Anybody can improve it
h.koppdelaney
http://www.flickr.com/photos/h-k-d/3654465786/
26. Danube University Krems
Centre for E-Government, Peter Parycek
18/03/2022
The Fiction of Democracy
Wethe People of the United States are thegovernment.
Thorne Enterprises
27. Danube University Krems
Centre for E-Government, Peter Parycek
18/03/2022
Article 1. … Its law emanates from the people.
The Fiction of Democracy
http://goo.gl/KiDsa
28. Danube University Krems
Centre for E-Government, Peter Parycek
18/03/2022
TechnologicalDemocratisation
… ofProduction
… ofDistribution
… ofthe Combination ofSupply & Demand
http://goo.gl/A7Uur
29. Danube University Krems
Centre for E-Government, Peter Parycek
18/03/2022
StrengtheningDemocracy
Organisations
of Legislation
(E-Legislation)
Organisations
of Administration
(E-Executive)
Organisations
of Jurisdiction
(E-Jurisdiction)
Information &Transparency
Participation & Collaboration
Government 2.0
Innovation Platforms, Crowdsourcing, …
Open Data, Usage of Social Media & Networks (internal/external), Creative
Commons, Data Protection Court, Open Communication, …
30. Danube University Krems
Centre for E-Government, Peter Parycek
18/03/2022
StrengtheningDemocracy
Governmental data & information
+ data and information processed
by civil society
Besides governmental experts,
expertise is provided by society
and included in the discourse.
The decision shall remain with
the government. The basis of
decision-making is well prepared;
or the dicision is handed on.
moretransparentandbetterdecisions
leadtomoretrustin the overall system.
moretrustleadstostrengthening ofthefictionof democracy
Information
- provision,
- preparation,
- dissamination &
- acquisiton
Discourse,
,
Opinion-Making
& Forming of the
Decision
& Execution
Agenda
Setting
Political Will
Mobilisation via Social Media & Networks
32. Danube University Krems
Centre for E-Government, Peter Parycek
18/03/2022
21 January2009 -Open GovernmentMemorandum:
“Transparency,Participation andCollaboration”
33. Danube University Krems
Centre for E-Government, Peter Parycek
18/03/2022
Malmö eGovernmentDeclaration
„Citizens and businesses are empowered by eGovernment
services designed around users needs and developed in
collaboration with third parties, as well as by increased
access to public information, strengthened transparency
and effective means for involvement of stakeholders in the
policy process.“
37. Danube University Krems
Centre for E-Government, Peter Parycek
18/03/2022
Apps forDemocracy (San Francisco)
Apps forDemocracy (San Francisco)
Results
47 web, iPhone, & Facebook apps
$2,600,000+ est. Value
$50,000 in cost
+5000% ROI
39. Danube University Krems
Centre for E-Government, Peter Parycek
18/03/2022
• backlog of over 600,000 applications
• ecosystem of scientific expertise
• community of inventors decides on its own
criteria for assessing patent applications.”
• 44 months down to 23!
Collaborationin administrative processes(USA)
50. Danube University Krems
Centre for E-Government, Peter Parycek
18/03/2022
macropoulos
Lack oftrust (on both sides)
macropoulos
51. Danube University Krems
Centre for E-Government, Peter Parycek
18/03/2022
Impendingloss of powerandcontrol causesinternal andexternal resistance
Atelier Teee
60. Danube University Krems
Centre for E-Government, Peter Parycek
18/03/2022
18/03/2022
Dr. Peter Parycek, MSc
Centre for E-Government, Donube University Krems
peter.parycek@donau-uni.ac.at
+43 2732 893-2312
http://www.donau-uni.ac.at/egov
http://linkedin.com/parycek
http://www.slideshare.net/parycek
http://twitter.com/parycek
THANK YOU
for your attention!
61. Danube University Krems
Centre for E-Government, Peter Parycek
18/03/2022
References:
Books & Articles:
The Long Tail: Why the Future of Business Is Selling Less of More, Chris Anderson, Harper Collins, 2008
Wikinomics, Don Tapscott, D. Williams, 2007
The Tipping Point: How Little Things Can Make A Big Difference, Malcolm Gladwell, Little, Brown, 2001
Linked: The New Science of Networks, Albert-Laszlo Barabasi, 2001
The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom, Yochai Benkler, 2007
Here Comes Everybody: The Power of Organizing Without Organizations, Clay Shirky, 2008
Which Kind of Collaboration Is Right for You? by Gary P. Pisano, Roberto Verganti, HBR 12/08
Swarm Creativity: Competitive Advantage Through Collaborative Innovation Networks, Peter A. Gloor, 2006
Crowdsourcing: Why the Power of the Crowd Is Driving the Future of Business, Jeff Howe, 2008
Throwing Sheep in the Boardroom, How Online Social Networking Will Transform Your Life, Work and World, Matthew Fraser,
Soumitra Dutta, 2008
Blogs:
Dion Hinchcliffe‘s Web 2.0 Blog: http://web2.socialcomputingmagazine.com/
Longtail Blog: http://www.thelongtail.com/
Wikinomics Blog: http://www.wikinomics.com/blog/
Examples:
http://www.innocentive.com/
http://www.gfbn.com/
http://www.ideastorm.com/
http://www.mysociety.org/
http://www.fixmystreet.com/
http://www.rassismusstreichen.at/
http://www.peertopatent.org/
http://www.jugend2help.gv.at/
http://askyourlawmaker.org/
http://www.meinparlament.at/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/noodlem/3174424306/sizes/o/in/photostream/ Ox Lee
Beijing mourning, Sichuan Earthquake memorial wall in Wangfujing Dajie, Beijing China.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/h-k-d/3654465786/
The new paradigm (of society) is, that most of the society-produced/generated content can be reused, rewritten or recreated. So nobody owns it, everybody can use it and anybody can improve it. We are in a “read/write culture”, like Rufus Pollack called it. The base for innovation is accessible and rewriteable content.
Traditional companies have to protect their content, cause they had to pay (their) authors and to run a whole organization including their overheads.
On the other hand, society and private authors have completely diverse business models and motivations. Their work is based on the gift-economy model and their motivation is non monetary; but based on social status, image, altruism and fun. In the case of social status and image, people are proud if their content I reused.
So there are (two) totally different frameworks:
Companies have to protect their content of being reused.
Individuals are motivating to reuse their content.
http://www.creativecommons.at/
“Apps for Democracy”:
This contest created 47 iPhone, Facebook and web applications!
with an estimated value in excess of $2,600,000 to the city.
with cost for Washington, DC of only $50,000
This (leads/) adds up to a return on investment of 5000 percent!
These are (impressive) figures (and potentials) which our leading politicians and our heads of administration should realize.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/17536602/Open-Government-Innovation-Apps-for-Democracy
http://blog.sunlightfoundation.com/2009/08/24/apps-for-america-the-finalists/
http://www.appsfordemocracy.org/about/
http://michaelschmid.at/protest-im-netz-unibrennt-audimax/
http://michaelschmid.at/protest-im-netz-unibrennt-audimax/
Da auch die Zahlen LURKERS + WIKI
