WHO IS THE AMERICAN OF THE COLONIAL PERIOD?  AN OVERVIEW
CHARACTERISTICS OF COLONISTS INDIVIDUALISTIC SELF SUFFICIENT OPTIMISTIC RUGGED MATERIALISTIC RELIGIOUS BELIEVED IN EQUALITY
PEOPLE VIEWED THEMSELVES AS EUROPEAN COLONISTS IDEA OF “AMERICAN” STILL BEING FORMED HOW DO WE KNOW WHAT THEY BELIEVED? USE OF PRIMARY SOURCES
HECTOR ST JOHN DE CREVOUCEUR LIVED ON PA.-NY BORDER WROTE “LETTERS FROM AN AMERICAN FARMER” DESCRIBED OUTLOOK OF COLONISTS PRIOR TO AMERICAN REVOLUTION
FRONTIER THESIS FREDERICK JACKSON TURNER AMERICANS WERE DEFINED BY THE FRONTIER CONTROVERSIAL TODAY WHAT ARE THE HOLES IN THE THEORY?
GERM THEORY AMERICAN INSTITUTIONS SPREAD FROM BRITAIN BICAMERAL LEGISLATURE AMERICAN LAW VOTING QUALIFICATIONS
WHAT DID THE COLONISTS FIND IN THE NEW WORLD? INDIANS THE FRONTIER
AMERICAN INDIANS ARRIVED 12,000-14,000 YEARS AGO NAMED BY CHRISTOPHER COLUMBUS ARE THEY REALLY “NATIVE” AMERICANS?
COLONIAL INTERPRETATIONS OF THE AMERICAN INDIAN DEVIL THEORY – INDIAN IS EVIL  NOBLE SAVAGE THEORY – INDIAN IS INNOCENT. THEY ARE BEGINNING CIVILIZATION ANEW.
AMERICAN INDIAN DEMOGRAPHICS HISTORIANS DISAGREE ON POPULATION 3 TO 10 MILLION IN NORTH AMERICA 500,000 ON EAST COAST 40 TO 60 MILLION IN NORTH AND SOUTH AMERICA COMBINED
AMERICAN INDIAN DEMOGRAPHICS OVER 25O TRIBES 5 PRIMARY LINGUISTIC GROUPS ALGONQUIN IROQUOIS MUSKOHEGAN SIOUX PUEBLO
ALGONQUIAN S MAINE TO CAROLINAS POLITICALLY DECENTRALIZED HOSPITABLE TO EUROPEANS SUSCEPTIBLE TO DISEASE
IROQUOIS UPSTATE PA AND NY POLITICALLY ORGANIZED MATRILINEAL LEAGUE OF THE IROQUOIS
CHARACTERISTICS OF AMERICAN INDIANS VARIED BASED ON REGION AND CLIMATE HUNTER/GATHERER NOMADIC COMMUNAL APPROACH TO LAND SOME AGRICULTURE SUSCEPTIBLE TO DISEASE
EUROPEAN RESPONSES TO INDIANS FRENCH – TRADE WITH INDIANS SPANISH – ENSLAVE AND CONVERT ENGLISH – GET RID OF THEM
THE FRONTIER WHERE CIVILIZATION MEETS THE WILDERNESS ENGLISH COLONIES FRENCH COLONIES SPANISH COLONIES
WHY DID ENGLAND SUCCEED? AGRICULTURAL FOUNDATION HANDLING OF INDIANS CAME FOR MORE THAN MONEY RESOURCES (NAVY) POLITICAL ACCIDENT SALUTARY NEGLECT
POLITICAL ACCIDENT 1603-1763 KING AND PARLIAMENT POWER STRUGGLE COLONIES DEVELOPED POLITICALLY BRITAIN OPPOSES THIS BUT IS UNABLE TO CONTROL IT
SALUTARY NEGLECT  MERCANTILISM – BRITISH ECONOMIC THEORY BASED ON FAVORABLE BALANCE OF TRADE COLONIES PROVIDE RAW MATERIALS AND PURCHASE FINISHED PRODUCTS BRITISH LAWS NOT ENFORCED
SALUTARY NEGLECT OLIVER CROMWELL – DEMANDED ENFORCEMENT NAVIGATION ACTS – RESTRICT COLONIAL TRADE ENFORCEMENT OF NAVIGATION ACTS DECLINES COLONIES DEVELOP ECONOMICALLY
SOCIAL ORIGINS OF COLONISTS WHO CAME?  MIDDLE CLASS ARTISANS THOSE WITH LIMITED ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY SPECULATORS
SOCIAL ORIGINS OF COLONISTS  WHY MOVE? ENCLOSURE MOVEMENT RISING PRICES POPULATION GROWTH RELIGIOUS UNREST
INDENTURED SERVANTS WRITTEN CONTRACT UP TO SEVEN YEARS OF SERVITUDE NO STIGMA ATTACHED DEBTORS AND CRIMINALS
HANLIN’S THEORY SOMETHING TO THINK ABOUT BLACKS IN THE COLONIES INDENTURED SERVANTS? RACISM? HOW DO WE KNOW?
ROANOKE ISLAND FIRST ATTEMPT AT A COLONY 1585 BY SIR WALTER RALEIGH IT FAILED
JAMESTOWN 1607 FIRST SUCCESSFUL ENGLISH SETTLEMENT CHARTER GRANTED TO VIRGINIA COMPANY, A JOINT STOCK COMPANY PURPOSE WAS TO FIND GOLD 900 INITIAL SETTLERS. 6O SURVIVORS
JAMESTOWN INDIAN POLICY – “TAKE GREAT PAINS NOT TO OFFEND THEM” VOYAGE – 4 MONTHS WHO WERE THE LEADERS? 1/3 WERE GENTLEMEN NO WOMEN
JAMESTOWN JOHN SMITH DEALT HARSHLY WITH SUSQUEHANNA INDIANS FORCED GENTLEMEN TO WORK STARVING TIME SMITH’S DEPARTURE
YES, THERE WAS A POCHAHANTAS DAUGHTER OF CHIEF POWHATAN MET JOHN SMITH KIDNAPPED IN 1613 CONVERTS TO CHRISTIANITY IN 1614 MARRIES JOHN ROLFE IN 1615 VISITS ENGLAND IN 1616 DIES SOON AFTER
MASSACHUSETTS BAY COLONY 1629 MASSACHUSETTS BAY COMPANY JOHN WINTHROP – LEADER COMPANY AND COLONY ARE THE SAME
MASSACHUSETTS BAY COLONY ADVENTURERS – THOSE WHO INVEST PLANTERS – THOSE WHO GO CAMBRIDGE AGREEMENT – MAKES THEM ONE AND THE SAME MASSACHUSETTS BAY IS UNIQUE
MASSACHUSETTS BAY COLONY CITY ON A HILL GREAT MIGRATION POLITICAL ACCIDENT AGAIN! COLONY EXISTS UNTIL 1684
PURITANS BELIEVED IN PURITY OF CHURCH GOOD SOCIAL CONDUCT IS A RESULT OF SALVATION, NOT A CAUSE COVENANT THEOLOGY COVENANT OF WORKS  COVENANT OF GRACE
PURITANS ALL RELATIONSHIPS ARE DEFINED BY GOD BELIEF IN MODERATE CONDUCT SOCIAL ORDER – ALL HAVE THEIR PLACE
PURITANS CHILDREN WORSHIP WORK LOVE VIOLATORS
PURITANS VISIBLE SAINTS CONVERSION EXPERIENCE ROLE OF LINEAGE AND ECONOMICS CIVIL MEN A THEOCRACY? HALFWAY COVENANT
QUAKERS WILLIAM PENN GEORGE FOX – QUAKER FOUNDER DIVINE REVELATION SPARK OF GOD NO MINISTRY PLAIN DRESS AND HOUSING
QUAKERS CHARLES II GAVE PENN COLONY TO COVER DEBTS THREE OBJECTIVES ENLARGE THE EMPIRE MAKE MERCANTILISM WORK CIVILIZE THE INDIANS
QUAKERS PROPRIETARY COLONY LIMITS IN CHARTER LIBERAL GOVERNMENT STRUCTURE CONCEPT OF EQUALITY

Colonial Roots

  • 1.
    WHO IS THEAMERICAN OF THE COLONIAL PERIOD? AN OVERVIEW
  • 2.
    CHARACTERISTICS OF COLONISTSINDIVIDUALISTIC SELF SUFFICIENT OPTIMISTIC RUGGED MATERIALISTIC RELIGIOUS BELIEVED IN EQUALITY
  • 3.
    PEOPLE VIEWED THEMSELVESAS EUROPEAN COLONISTS IDEA OF “AMERICAN” STILL BEING FORMED HOW DO WE KNOW WHAT THEY BELIEVED? USE OF PRIMARY SOURCES
  • 4.
    HECTOR ST JOHNDE CREVOUCEUR LIVED ON PA.-NY BORDER WROTE “LETTERS FROM AN AMERICAN FARMER” DESCRIBED OUTLOOK OF COLONISTS PRIOR TO AMERICAN REVOLUTION
  • 5.
    FRONTIER THESIS FREDERICKJACKSON TURNER AMERICANS WERE DEFINED BY THE FRONTIER CONTROVERSIAL TODAY WHAT ARE THE HOLES IN THE THEORY?
  • 6.
    GERM THEORY AMERICANINSTITUTIONS SPREAD FROM BRITAIN BICAMERAL LEGISLATURE AMERICAN LAW VOTING QUALIFICATIONS
  • 7.
    WHAT DID THECOLONISTS FIND IN THE NEW WORLD? INDIANS THE FRONTIER
  • 8.
    AMERICAN INDIANS ARRIVED12,000-14,000 YEARS AGO NAMED BY CHRISTOPHER COLUMBUS ARE THEY REALLY “NATIVE” AMERICANS?
  • 9.
    COLONIAL INTERPRETATIONS OFTHE AMERICAN INDIAN DEVIL THEORY – INDIAN IS EVIL NOBLE SAVAGE THEORY – INDIAN IS INNOCENT. THEY ARE BEGINNING CIVILIZATION ANEW.
  • 10.
    AMERICAN INDIAN DEMOGRAPHICSHISTORIANS DISAGREE ON POPULATION 3 TO 10 MILLION IN NORTH AMERICA 500,000 ON EAST COAST 40 TO 60 MILLION IN NORTH AND SOUTH AMERICA COMBINED
  • 11.
    AMERICAN INDIAN DEMOGRAPHICSOVER 25O TRIBES 5 PRIMARY LINGUISTIC GROUPS ALGONQUIN IROQUOIS MUSKOHEGAN SIOUX PUEBLO
  • 12.
    ALGONQUIAN S MAINETO CAROLINAS POLITICALLY DECENTRALIZED HOSPITABLE TO EUROPEANS SUSCEPTIBLE TO DISEASE
  • 13.
    IROQUOIS UPSTATE PAAND NY POLITICALLY ORGANIZED MATRILINEAL LEAGUE OF THE IROQUOIS
  • 14.
    CHARACTERISTICS OF AMERICANINDIANS VARIED BASED ON REGION AND CLIMATE HUNTER/GATHERER NOMADIC COMMUNAL APPROACH TO LAND SOME AGRICULTURE SUSCEPTIBLE TO DISEASE
  • 15.
    EUROPEAN RESPONSES TOINDIANS FRENCH – TRADE WITH INDIANS SPANISH – ENSLAVE AND CONVERT ENGLISH – GET RID OF THEM
  • 16.
    THE FRONTIER WHERECIVILIZATION MEETS THE WILDERNESS ENGLISH COLONIES FRENCH COLONIES SPANISH COLONIES
  • 17.
    WHY DID ENGLANDSUCCEED? AGRICULTURAL FOUNDATION HANDLING OF INDIANS CAME FOR MORE THAN MONEY RESOURCES (NAVY) POLITICAL ACCIDENT SALUTARY NEGLECT
  • 18.
    POLITICAL ACCIDENT 1603-1763KING AND PARLIAMENT POWER STRUGGLE COLONIES DEVELOPED POLITICALLY BRITAIN OPPOSES THIS BUT IS UNABLE TO CONTROL IT
  • 19.
    SALUTARY NEGLECT MERCANTILISM – BRITISH ECONOMIC THEORY BASED ON FAVORABLE BALANCE OF TRADE COLONIES PROVIDE RAW MATERIALS AND PURCHASE FINISHED PRODUCTS BRITISH LAWS NOT ENFORCED
  • 20.
    SALUTARY NEGLECT OLIVERCROMWELL – DEMANDED ENFORCEMENT NAVIGATION ACTS – RESTRICT COLONIAL TRADE ENFORCEMENT OF NAVIGATION ACTS DECLINES COLONIES DEVELOP ECONOMICALLY
  • 21.
    SOCIAL ORIGINS OFCOLONISTS WHO CAME? MIDDLE CLASS ARTISANS THOSE WITH LIMITED ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY SPECULATORS
  • 22.
    SOCIAL ORIGINS OFCOLONISTS WHY MOVE? ENCLOSURE MOVEMENT RISING PRICES POPULATION GROWTH RELIGIOUS UNREST
  • 23.
    INDENTURED SERVANTS WRITTENCONTRACT UP TO SEVEN YEARS OF SERVITUDE NO STIGMA ATTACHED DEBTORS AND CRIMINALS
  • 24.
    HANLIN’S THEORY SOMETHINGTO THINK ABOUT BLACKS IN THE COLONIES INDENTURED SERVANTS? RACISM? HOW DO WE KNOW?
  • 25.
    ROANOKE ISLAND FIRSTATTEMPT AT A COLONY 1585 BY SIR WALTER RALEIGH IT FAILED
  • 26.
    JAMESTOWN 1607 FIRSTSUCCESSFUL ENGLISH SETTLEMENT CHARTER GRANTED TO VIRGINIA COMPANY, A JOINT STOCK COMPANY PURPOSE WAS TO FIND GOLD 900 INITIAL SETTLERS. 6O SURVIVORS
  • 27.
    JAMESTOWN INDIAN POLICY– “TAKE GREAT PAINS NOT TO OFFEND THEM” VOYAGE – 4 MONTHS WHO WERE THE LEADERS? 1/3 WERE GENTLEMEN NO WOMEN
  • 28.
    JAMESTOWN JOHN SMITHDEALT HARSHLY WITH SUSQUEHANNA INDIANS FORCED GENTLEMEN TO WORK STARVING TIME SMITH’S DEPARTURE
  • 29.
    YES, THERE WASA POCHAHANTAS DAUGHTER OF CHIEF POWHATAN MET JOHN SMITH KIDNAPPED IN 1613 CONVERTS TO CHRISTIANITY IN 1614 MARRIES JOHN ROLFE IN 1615 VISITS ENGLAND IN 1616 DIES SOON AFTER
  • 30.
    MASSACHUSETTS BAY COLONY1629 MASSACHUSETTS BAY COMPANY JOHN WINTHROP – LEADER COMPANY AND COLONY ARE THE SAME
  • 31.
    MASSACHUSETTS BAY COLONYADVENTURERS – THOSE WHO INVEST PLANTERS – THOSE WHO GO CAMBRIDGE AGREEMENT – MAKES THEM ONE AND THE SAME MASSACHUSETTS BAY IS UNIQUE
  • 32.
    MASSACHUSETTS BAY COLONYCITY ON A HILL GREAT MIGRATION POLITICAL ACCIDENT AGAIN! COLONY EXISTS UNTIL 1684
  • 33.
    PURITANS BELIEVED INPURITY OF CHURCH GOOD SOCIAL CONDUCT IS A RESULT OF SALVATION, NOT A CAUSE COVENANT THEOLOGY COVENANT OF WORKS COVENANT OF GRACE
  • 34.
    PURITANS ALL RELATIONSHIPSARE DEFINED BY GOD BELIEF IN MODERATE CONDUCT SOCIAL ORDER – ALL HAVE THEIR PLACE
  • 35.
    PURITANS CHILDREN WORSHIPWORK LOVE VIOLATORS
  • 36.
    PURITANS VISIBLE SAINTSCONVERSION EXPERIENCE ROLE OF LINEAGE AND ECONOMICS CIVIL MEN A THEOCRACY? HALFWAY COVENANT
  • 37.
    QUAKERS WILLIAM PENNGEORGE FOX – QUAKER FOUNDER DIVINE REVELATION SPARK OF GOD NO MINISTRY PLAIN DRESS AND HOUSING
  • 38.
    QUAKERS CHARLES IIGAVE PENN COLONY TO COVER DEBTS THREE OBJECTIVES ENLARGE THE EMPIRE MAKE MERCANTILISM WORK CIVILIZE THE INDIANS
  • 39.
    QUAKERS PROPRIETARY COLONYLIMITS IN CHARTER LIBERAL GOVERNMENT STRUCTURE CONCEPT OF EQUALITY