COLLABORATIVE STUDY: 
Academic and Social Benefits 
for EFL Students 
Laura Kieselbach 
Northeastern University EdD Program 
Bergamo Conference, October 10, 2014 
Journal of Curriculum Theorizing
Collaboration in Three Parts: 
2 or more people 
Work together 
Learn something new 
Implications of this approach: 
• Enhanced skill development in critical reading, 
listening, speaking and writing skills 
For EFL (English as a Foreign Language) students, 
this method is resulting in improved achievement 
levels and enhanced social skills.
Discovery 
• Chen & Chen (2010): studied 56 
Taiwanese students who used “social 
tagging” as a reading strategy 
• Social Tagging defined: a system that enables 
users to add keywords (tags) to Internet resources 
(e.g. web pages, images, videos) without relying 
on a controlled vocabulary 
• Result: those in worked in collaboration 
with their peers to access new modalities 
of social communication and seek 
opportunities for data mining performed 
better than independent workers
Jim Cummins (2011) asserts: 
• EFL students should have abundant access to 
print text and engage actively with these texts 
• Animated discussions and debates should be 
the classroom “norm” to offer a plethora of 
opportunities for EFL students to hear and 
speak the English language 
• Conversational fluency is very different from 
academic fluency, resulting often in poor 
performance of EFL students on standardized 
tests 
• A period of 5 years is generally required for 
fluent acquisition of the language
STUDENT TESTIMONIALS: 
“We could help each other…” 
“I always knew I could ask my classmates for help.” 
“Working together offered personal bonds along with 
academic…” 
This qualitative data obtained by Zoghi, Mustapha, & 
Maasum (2010) reflects the enriching experience of 
interdependence on peers for learning that 
encourages social and cognitive individual 
development.
Basics of Collaboration 
Fransen, Kirschner, & Erkens (2011) emphasize 
the importance of collaborative learning 
communities sharing mental models and 
performance monitoring. 
Considerations when forming collaborative teams: 
• Student ability 
• Group characteristics 
• Role assignments 
Outcomes of collaborative teams: 
• Discussion, discovery, debate
Four Components, according to Dillenbourg (1999): 
1. Peers are (more or less) at the same level (grade, 
performance, maturity), can perform the same 
actions, have a common goal, and work together. 
2. Interaction is present: students not only work 
together, but evaluate one another, negotiate an 
understanding during conflict, and reason 
synchronously to build mutual knowledge. 
3. Processes specifically required for learning 
(induction, cognition, explanation, conflict 
resolution) must be present in the individual before 
he/she can be effective in a group 
4. Effect requires students to know the exact scenario 
in order to make sense of productivity and teachers 
should utilize tools to determine acquisition of 
knowledge after collaboration.
“The challenge of successful 
collaboration for EFL students is the 
transfer of cognitive tools from the 
social plane (interaction with others) to 
the inner plane (reasoning), since this 
process implies social interaction” 
- Dillenbourg (1999)
Strategies 
• Carefully design the situation to increase 
the probability of productivity 
• Place EFL learners in a team of experts 
beyond their ability (this helps with gains 
and knowledge acquisition) 
• Go beyond basic language teaching 
methods in allowing collaboration – this 
lends to greater reading comprehension in 
EFL learners 
• Regularly use print to interact with text for 
EFL learners – this allows a purposeful 
engagement with words 
• When available, incorporate technology 
that allows for hands-on EFL involvement
Studies 
Chen & Chen (2010): TACO 
• Tag-based collaborative reading learning system 
• 2 groups – A and B – one with TACO 
• Read “Wuthering Heights” excerpt 
• Pre-test and post-test preformed 
• Results demonstrated high correlation between 
performance and those that worked with the 
TACO system 
Zoghi (2010): MCSR 
• Modified Collaborative Reading Strategy 
• 42 EFL freshmen, 90 min/week, 6 weeks 
• Strategic reading in small groups 
• Students read with more efficiency and better 
clarity when working with peers
Social Benefits 
Collaboration allows EFL learners greater 
exposure to the language and the processes of 
critical thinking and problem solving. 
EFL learners learn the valuable skills of equal 
participation and accountability in a shared 
classroom environment. 
The communal skills and cognition cues of EFL 
learners working in collaboration with their peers 
are drastically enhanced compared to independent 
learners.
Theoretical and Pedagogical Implications 
Programs like the MCRS (modified collaborative 
reading strategy) gave EFL learners a greater 
opportunity to participate in their own learning, 
according to student feedback. 
Language acquisition and writing abilities are 
enhanced by collaboratively working among peers. 
Opportunities for meaningful and purposeful 
communication engages cognitive processing that 
operates as a source for language accuracy in ELL’s. 
The nature of collaborative learning with fluent 
speakers lends itself to discussion, correction, and 
development of skills, making it a resourceful and 
effective teaching method.
In Summary 
• Clearly specify tasks and outcomes when 
implementing collaborative learning. 
• Identify the best place for EFL leaners to thrive 
among his/her peers groups. 
• Be purposeful when instructing students to listen, 
to you and to their peers: EFL learners become 
more aware of the language this way 
• Encourage EFL learners to question their peers in 
order to gain comprehension and understanding 
• Carefully assign roles so that all students can 
contribute their ideas and insight 
• EFL learners will construct and transform learning 
that occurs as a joint activity through the process 
of approximation and internalization
THE END! 
Thank you 
for your time!

Collaborative Literacy: Social and Academic Benefits for EFL Students

  • 1.
    COLLABORATIVE STUDY: Academicand Social Benefits for EFL Students Laura Kieselbach Northeastern University EdD Program Bergamo Conference, October 10, 2014 Journal of Curriculum Theorizing
  • 2.
    Collaboration in ThreeParts: 2 or more people Work together Learn something new Implications of this approach: • Enhanced skill development in critical reading, listening, speaking and writing skills For EFL (English as a Foreign Language) students, this method is resulting in improved achievement levels and enhanced social skills.
  • 3.
    Discovery • Chen& Chen (2010): studied 56 Taiwanese students who used “social tagging” as a reading strategy • Social Tagging defined: a system that enables users to add keywords (tags) to Internet resources (e.g. web pages, images, videos) without relying on a controlled vocabulary • Result: those in worked in collaboration with their peers to access new modalities of social communication and seek opportunities for data mining performed better than independent workers
  • 4.
    Jim Cummins (2011)asserts: • EFL students should have abundant access to print text and engage actively with these texts • Animated discussions and debates should be the classroom “norm” to offer a plethora of opportunities for EFL students to hear and speak the English language • Conversational fluency is very different from academic fluency, resulting often in poor performance of EFL students on standardized tests • A period of 5 years is generally required for fluent acquisition of the language
  • 5.
    STUDENT TESTIMONIALS: “Wecould help each other…” “I always knew I could ask my classmates for help.” “Working together offered personal bonds along with academic…” This qualitative data obtained by Zoghi, Mustapha, & Maasum (2010) reflects the enriching experience of interdependence on peers for learning that encourages social and cognitive individual development.
  • 6.
    Basics of Collaboration Fransen, Kirschner, & Erkens (2011) emphasize the importance of collaborative learning communities sharing mental models and performance monitoring. Considerations when forming collaborative teams: • Student ability • Group characteristics • Role assignments Outcomes of collaborative teams: • Discussion, discovery, debate
  • 7.
    Four Components, accordingto Dillenbourg (1999): 1. Peers are (more or less) at the same level (grade, performance, maturity), can perform the same actions, have a common goal, and work together. 2. Interaction is present: students not only work together, but evaluate one another, negotiate an understanding during conflict, and reason synchronously to build mutual knowledge. 3. Processes specifically required for learning (induction, cognition, explanation, conflict resolution) must be present in the individual before he/she can be effective in a group 4. Effect requires students to know the exact scenario in order to make sense of productivity and teachers should utilize tools to determine acquisition of knowledge after collaboration.
  • 8.
    “The challenge ofsuccessful collaboration for EFL students is the transfer of cognitive tools from the social plane (interaction with others) to the inner plane (reasoning), since this process implies social interaction” - Dillenbourg (1999)
  • 9.
    Strategies • Carefullydesign the situation to increase the probability of productivity • Place EFL learners in a team of experts beyond their ability (this helps with gains and knowledge acquisition) • Go beyond basic language teaching methods in allowing collaboration – this lends to greater reading comprehension in EFL learners • Regularly use print to interact with text for EFL learners – this allows a purposeful engagement with words • When available, incorporate technology that allows for hands-on EFL involvement
  • 10.
    Studies Chen &Chen (2010): TACO • Tag-based collaborative reading learning system • 2 groups – A and B – one with TACO • Read “Wuthering Heights” excerpt • Pre-test and post-test preformed • Results demonstrated high correlation between performance and those that worked with the TACO system Zoghi (2010): MCSR • Modified Collaborative Reading Strategy • 42 EFL freshmen, 90 min/week, 6 weeks • Strategic reading in small groups • Students read with more efficiency and better clarity when working with peers
  • 11.
    Social Benefits Collaborationallows EFL learners greater exposure to the language and the processes of critical thinking and problem solving. EFL learners learn the valuable skills of equal participation and accountability in a shared classroom environment. The communal skills and cognition cues of EFL learners working in collaboration with their peers are drastically enhanced compared to independent learners.
  • 12.
    Theoretical and PedagogicalImplications Programs like the MCRS (modified collaborative reading strategy) gave EFL learners a greater opportunity to participate in their own learning, according to student feedback. Language acquisition and writing abilities are enhanced by collaboratively working among peers. Opportunities for meaningful and purposeful communication engages cognitive processing that operates as a source for language accuracy in ELL’s. The nature of collaborative learning with fluent speakers lends itself to discussion, correction, and development of skills, making it a resourceful and effective teaching method.
  • 13.
    In Summary •Clearly specify tasks and outcomes when implementing collaborative learning. • Identify the best place for EFL leaners to thrive among his/her peers groups. • Be purposeful when instructing students to listen, to you and to their peers: EFL learners become more aware of the language this way • Encourage EFL learners to question their peers in order to gain comprehension and understanding • Carefully assign roles so that all students can contribute their ideas and insight • EFL learners will construct and transform learning that occurs as a joint activity through the process of approximation and internalization
  • 14.
    THE END! Thankyou for your time!