本投影片為協作資訊尋求系統(Collaborative Information Seeking Systems)之文獻回顧。目的在於檢視近十年協作資訊尋求系統之相關研究,梳理系統的研究方向與發展,了解目前系統的設計概念與運作方式。協作資訊尋求系統的研究主要分為兩個方向發展:系統中介(System-mediated)或演算法中介(Algorithmically-mediated),以系統背後的演算法支持協作;以及使用者中介(User-mediated)或介面中介(Interface-mediated),透過介面設計支持使用者協作。此外,本報告亦討論協作資訊系統需要注重的因素,以及發展上的議題,最後統整對於未來發展方向上的建議。
Toward distributed infrastructures for digital preservation: the roles of col...Michael Day
Presentation given at: Curating our Digital Scientific Heritage: a Global Collaborative Challenge, 3rd International Digital Curation Conference, Washington, D.C., December 11-13, 2007
Woogle -- On Why and How to Marry Wikis with Enterprise SearchHans-Joerg Happel
Enterprise Search engines are strong in locating existing documents and information in an organization while Wikis are designed to capture new information in a lightweight and collaborative fashion. Conversely, Wikis are rather bad in locating information (especially from external documents) while Enterprise Search does not address the provision of new information and socializing around information needs. Therefore we argue that both systems focus on specific parts of the organizational information process, which should indeed be combined in order to improve enterprise information exchange. We discuss “Woogle” as a concept to integrate Enterprise Search into Wikis and describe its reference implementation “Woogle4MediaWiki”.
All the latest details and statistics on the Research Data Alliance. Who's involved, how to become a member and what working and interest groups are currently up and running ...
Toward distributed infrastructures for digital preservation: the roles of col...Michael Day
Presentation given at: Curating our Digital Scientific Heritage: a Global Collaborative Challenge, 3rd International Digital Curation Conference, Washington, D.C., December 11-13, 2007
Woogle -- On Why and How to Marry Wikis with Enterprise SearchHans-Joerg Happel
Enterprise Search engines are strong in locating existing documents and information in an organization while Wikis are designed to capture new information in a lightweight and collaborative fashion. Conversely, Wikis are rather bad in locating information (especially from external documents) while Enterprise Search does not address the provision of new information and socializing around information needs. Therefore we argue that both systems focus on specific parts of the organizational information process, which should indeed be combined in order to improve enterprise information exchange. We discuss “Woogle” as a concept to integrate Enterprise Search into Wikis and describe its reference implementation “Woogle4MediaWiki”.
All the latest details and statistics on the Research Data Alliance. Who's involved, how to become a member and what working and interest groups are currently up and running ...
Using technology and constituting structures: A practice lens for studying te...James Chuang
Orlikowski, W. J. (2000). Using technology and constituting structures: A practice lens for studying technology in organizations. Organization Science, 11(4), 404-428.
E-government interoperability: Interaction of policy, management, and technol...James Chuang
Pardo, T. A., Nam, T., & Burke, G. B. (2012). E-government interoperability: Interaction of policy, management, and technology dimensions. Social Science Computer Review, 30(1), 7-23.
Improvisation (Ciborra 1999)
situated performance where thinking and action emerge simultaneously
improvisation seems to be ruled at the same time by intuition, competence, design and chance
Multimodal Learning Analytics for Collaborative Learning Understanding and Su...Sambit Praharaj
This project has multiple focus points: using the help of Multimodal Learning Analytics to understand how co-located collaboration takes place, what are the indicators of collaboration (such as pointing at peer, looking at peer, making
constructive interruptions, etc.); then we try to form a Collaboration Framework (CF)
which defines the aspects of successful collaboration and forms a model. These
insights help us to build the support framework to enable efficient real-time feedback
during a group activity to facilitate collaboration.
This was part of the Doctoral Consortium presentation in the ICMI Conference 2019 at Suzhou, China on 14th October, 2019. Collaboration is an important skill of the 21st century. It can take place in an online (or remote) setting or in a colocated
(or face-to-face) setting. With the large scale adoption
of sensor use, studies on co-located collaboration (CC) has
gained momentum. CC takes place in physical spaces where
the group members share each other’s social and epistemic
space. This involves subtle multimodal interactions such
as gaze, gestures, speech, discourse which are complex in
nature. The aim of this PhD is to detect these interactions
and then use these insights to build an automated real-time
feedback system to facilitate co-located collaboration
In the library sciences, information seeking has long been recognized as a collaborative activity, and recent work has attempted to model group information seeking behavior. Until recently, technological support for group-based information seeking has been limited to collaborative filtering and "social search" applications. In the past two years, however, a new kind of technologically-mediated collaborative search has been demonstrated in systems such as SearchTogether and Cerchiamo. This approach is more closely grounded in the library science interpretation of collaboration: rather than inferring commonality of interest through similarity of queries (social search), the new approach assumes an explicitly-shared information need for a group. This allows the system to focus on mediating the collaboration rather than detecting its presence. In this talk, we describe a model that captures both user behavior and system architecture, describe its relationship to other models of information seeking, and use it to classify existing multi-user search systems. We also describe implications this model has for design and evaluation of new collaborative information seeking systems.
Talk presented at NIST on October 22, 2009.
This is the summary of the material discussed in the classes of CSCW, a new elective taught to MTech students in 2012 at JIIT, Noida, India. Essentially speaking, these are the excerpts of the selected papers and other publications.
Multimodal Analytics for Real-time Feedback in Co-located Collaboration, EC-T...Sambit Praharaj
This presentation was part of the EC-TEL conference in Leeds, UK. The full research paper is published in the Springer LNCS proceedings and can be found here:
https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-98572-5_15
At present, the state-of-the-art supplies for conducting a face-to-face design thinking workshop typically consists of self-stick notes and stickers, markers, and whiteboards. However, this analog way of working is incongruent with the realities of global software companies, where most products and services are developed by distributed teams. This paper explores the process of facilitating remote design thinking workshops, using information technology and communication tools. The paper is based on a participatory action research undertaken by the author as a part of the doctoral thesis - ‘a study on an approach to prepare the organization mindset to build design-led innovation culture to become a customer-centric and future driven software company’ in the Indian IT sector. The participating company realized the innovation breakthroughs using design thinking can happen only when their organization can collaborate across disciplines, silos, time zones; and were looking for a solution to scale design thinking in their organization. KEYWORDS: Collaboration, Digital Design Thinking, Distributed Teams, Innovation, Remote Design Thinking, Scale Design Thinking
Published in International Research Journal of Marketing and Economics ISSN: (2349-0314) Impact Factor- 5.779, Volume 5, Issue 7, July 2018
Crowdsourcing Approaches for Smart City Open Data ManagementEdward Curry
A wide-scale bottom-up approach to the creation and management of open data has been demonstrated by projects like Freebase, Wikipedia, and DBpedia. This talk explores how to involving a wide community of users in collaborative management of open data activities within a Smart City. The talk discusses how crowdsourcing techniques can be applied within a Smart City context using crowdsourcing and human computation platforms such as Amazon Mechanical Turk, Mobile Works, and Crowd Flower.
Using technology and constituting structures: A practice lens for studying te...James Chuang
Orlikowski, W. J. (2000). Using technology and constituting structures: A practice lens for studying technology in organizations. Organization Science, 11(4), 404-428.
E-government interoperability: Interaction of policy, management, and technol...James Chuang
Pardo, T. A., Nam, T., & Burke, G. B. (2012). E-government interoperability: Interaction of policy, management, and technology dimensions. Social Science Computer Review, 30(1), 7-23.
Improvisation (Ciborra 1999)
situated performance where thinking and action emerge simultaneously
improvisation seems to be ruled at the same time by intuition, competence, design and chance
Multimodal Learning Analytics for Collaborative Learning Understanding and Su...Sambit Praharaj
This project has multiple focus points: using the help of Multimodal Learning Analytics to understand how co-located collaboration takes place, what are the indicators of collaboration (such as pointing at peer, looking at peer, making
constructive interruptions, etc.); then we try to form a Collaboration Framework (CF)
which defines the aspects of successful collaboration and forms a model. These
insights help us to build the support framework to enable efficient real-time feedback
during a group activity to facilitate collaboration.
This was part of the Doctoral Consortium presentation in the ICMI Conference 2019 at Suzhou, China on 14th October, 2019. Collaboration is an important skill of the 21st century. It can take place in an online (or remote) setting or in a colocated
(or face-to-face) setting. With the large scale adoption
of sensor use, studies on co-located collaboration (CC) has
gained momentum. CC takes place in physical spaces where
the group members share each other’s social and epistemic
space. This involves subtle multimodal interactions such
as gaze, gestures, speech, discourse which are complex in
nature. The aim of this PhD is to detect these interactions
and then use these insights to build an automated real-time
feedback system to facilitate co-located collaboration
In the library sciences, information seeking has long been recognized as a collaborative activity, and recent work has attempted to model group information seeking behavior. Until recently, technological support for group-based information seeking has been limited to collaborative filtering and "social search" applications. In the past two years, however, a new kind of technologically-mediated collaborative search has been demonstrated in systems such as SearchTogether and Cerchiamo. This approach is more closely grounded in the library science interpretation of collaboration: rather than inferring commonality of interest through similarity of queries (social search), the new approach assumes an explicitly-shared information need for a group. This allows the system to focus on mediating the collaboration rather than detecting its presence. In this talk, we describe a model that captures both user behavior and system architecture, describe its relationship to other models of information seeking, and use it to classify existing multi-user search systems. We also describe implications this model has for design and evaluation of new collaborative information seeking systems.
Talk presented at NIST on October 22, 2009.
This is the summary of the material discussed in the classes of CSCW, a new elective taught to MTech students in 2012 at JIIT, Noida, India. Essentially speaking, these are the excerpts of the selected papers and other publications.
Multimodal Analytics for Real-time Feedback in Co-located Collaboration, EC-T...Sambit Praharaj
This presentation was part of the EC-TEL conference in Leeds, UK. The full research paper is published in the Springer LNCS proceedings and can be found here:
https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-98572-5_15
At present, the state-of-the-art supplies for conducting a face-to-face design thinking workshop typically consists of self-stick notes and stickers, markers, and whiteboards. However, this analog way of working is incongruent with the realities of global software companies, where most products and services are developed by distributed teams. This paper explores the process of facilitating remote design thinking workshops, using information technology and communication tools. The paper is based on a participatory action research undertaken by the author as a part of the doctoral thesis - ‘a study on an approach to prepare the organization mindset to build design-led innovation culture to become a customer-centric and future driven software company’ in the Indian IT sector. The participating company realized the innovation breakthroughs using design thinking can happen only when their organization can collaborate across disciplines, silos, time zones; and were looking for a solution to scale design thinking in their organization. KEYWORDS: Collaboration, Digital Design Thinking, Distributed Teams, Innovation, Remote Design Thinking, Scale Design Thinking
Published in International Research Journal of Marketing and Economics ISSN: (2349-0314) Impact Factor- 5.779, Volume 5, Issue 7, July 2018
Crowdsourcing Approaches for Smart City Open Data ManagementEdward Curry
A wide-scale bottom-up approach to the creation and management of open data has been demonstrated by projects like Freebase, Wikipedia, and DBpedia. This talk explores how to involving a wide community of users in collaborative management of open data activities within a Smart City. The talk discusses how crowdsourcing techniques can be applied within a Smart City context using crowdsourcing and human computation platforms such as Amazon Mechanical Turk, Mobile Works, and Crowd Flower.
Collaborative methodologies for writing open educational textbooks a state of...Proyecto LATIn
Abstract. The importance of collaborative electronic textbooks in the context of Open Educational Resources has been growing worldwide. This paper presents an state-of-the-art analysis of collaborative methodologies necessary for the shared creation of collaborative books, with a more specific attention given to open academic textbooks. This paper explore the academic literature of general concept of collaboration to more specific task of collaborative writing and example of successful initiatives of open textbooks around the world. The main conclusion of this study is that the any methodology for such creation should depend heavily on the conformation and cultural context of the writing group.
Invited keynote given at the IEEE 21st International Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work in Design (CSCWD 2017) in Wellington, New Zealand, 26 April 2017.
A Strategic Approach: GenAI in EducationPeter Windle
Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies such as Generative AI, Image Generators and Large Language Models have had a dramatic impact on teaching, learning and assessment over the past 18 months. The most immediate threat AI posed was to Academic Integrity with Higher Education Institutes (HEIs) focusing their efforts on combating the use of GenAI in assessment. Guidelines were developed for staff and students, policies put in place too. Innovative educators have forged paths in the use of Generative AI for teaching, learning and assessments leading to pockets of transformation springing up across HEIs, often with little or no top-down guidance, support or direction.
This Gasta posits a strategic approach to integrating AI into HEIs to prepare staff, students and the curriculum for an evolving world and workplace. We will highlight the advantages of working with these technologies beyond the realm of teaching, learning and assessment by considering prompt engineering skills, industry impact, curriculum changes, and the need for staff upskilling. In contrast, not engaging strategically with Generative AI poses risks, including falling behind peers, missed opportunities and failing to ensure our graduates remain employable. The rapid evolution of AI technologies necessitates a proactive and strategic approach if we are to remain relevant.
The Roman Empire A Historical Colossus.pdfkaushalkr1407
The Roman Empire, a vast and enduring power, stands as one of history's most remarkable civilizations, leaving an indelible imprint on the world. It emerged from the Roman Republic, transitioning into an imperial powerhouse under the leadership of Augustus Caesar in 27 BCE. This transformation marked the beginning of an era defined by unprecedented territorial expansion, architectural marvels, and profound cultural influence.
The empire's roots lie in the city of Rome, founded, according to legend, by Romulus in 753 BCE. Over centuries, Rome evolved from a small settlement to a formidable republic, characterized by a complex political system with elected officials and checks on power. However, internal strife, class conflicts, and military ambitions paved the way for the end of the Republic. Julius Caesar’s dictatorship and subsequent assassination in 44 BCE created a power vacuum, leading to a civil war. Octavian, later Augustus, emerged victorious, heralding the Roman Empire’s birth.
Under Augustus, the empire experienced the Pax Romana, a 200-year period of relative peace and stability. Augustus reformed the military, established efficient administrative systems, and initiated grand construction projects. The empire's borders expanded, encompassing territories from Britain to Egypt and from Spain to the Euphrates. Roman legions, renowned for their discipline and engineering prowess, secured and maintained these vast territories, building roads, fortifications, and cities that facilitated control and integration.
The Roman Empire’s society was hierarchical, with a rigid class system. At the top were the patricians, wealthy elites who held significant political power. Below them were the plebeians, free citizens with limited political influence, and the vast numbers of slaves who formed the backbone of the economy. The family unit was central, governed by the paterfamilias, the male head who held absolute authority.
Culturally, the Romans were eclectic, absorbing and adapting elements from the civilizations they encountered, particularly the Greeks. Roman art, literature, and philosophy reflected this synthesis, creating a rich cultural tapestry. Latin, the Roman language, became the lingua franca of the Western world, influencing numerous modern languages.
Roman architecture and engineering achievements were monumental. They perfected the arch, vault, and dome, constructing enduring structures like the Colosseum, Pantheon, and aqueducts. These engineering marvels not only showcased Roman ingenuity but also served practical purposes, from public entertainment to water supply.
Palestine last event orientationfvgnh .pptxRaedMohamed3
An EFL lesson about the current events in Palestine. It is intended to be for intermediate students who wish to increase their listening skills through a short lesson in power point.
Acetabularia Information For Class 9 .docxvaibhavrinwa19
Acetabularia acetabulum is a single-celled green alga that in its vegetative state is morphologically differentiated into a basal rhizoid and an axially elongated stalk, which bears whorls of branching hairs. The single diploid nucleus resides in the rhizoid.
Honest Reviews of Tim Han LMA Course Program.pptxtimhan337
Personal development courses are widely available today, with each one promising life-changing outcomes. Tim Han’s Life Mastery Achievers (LMA) Course has drawn a lot of interest. In addition to offering my frank assessment of Success Insider’s LMA Course, this piece examines the course’s effects via a variety of Tim Han LMA course reviews and Success Insider comments.
Introduction to AI for Nonprofits with Tapp NetworkTechSoup
Dive into the world of AI! Experts Jon Hill and Tareq Monaur will guide you through AI's role in enhancing nonprofit websites and basic marketing strategies, making it easy to understand and apply.
2024.06.01 Introducing a competency framework for languag learning materials ...Sandy Millin
http://sandymillin.wordpress.com/iateflwebinar2024
Published classroom materials form the basis of syllabuses, drive teacher professional development, and have a potentially huge influence on learners, teachers and education systems. All teachers also create their own materials, whether a few sentences on a blackboard, a highly-structured fully-realised online course, or anything in between. Despite this, the knowledge and skills needed to create effective language learning materials are rarely part of teacher training, and are mostly learnt by trial and error.
Knowledge and skills frameworks, generally called competency frameworks, for ELT teachers, trainers and managers have existed for a few years now. However, until I created one for my MA dissertation, there wasn’t one drawing together what we need to know and do to be able to effectively produce language learning materials.
This webinar will introduce you to my framework, highlighting the key competencies I identified from my research. It will also show how anybody involved in language teaching (any language, not just English!), teacher training, managing schools or developing language learning materials can benefit from using the framework.
Instructions for Submissions thorugh G- Classroom.pptxJheel Barad
This presentation provides a briefing on how to upload submissions and documents in Google Classroom. It was prepared as part of an orientation for new Sainik School in-service teacher trainees. As a training officer, my goal is to ensure that you are comfortable and proficient with this essential tool for managing assignments and fostering student engagement.
Embracing GenAI - A Strategic ImperativePeter Windle
Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies such as Generative AI, Image Generators and Large Language Models have had a dramatic impact on teaching, learning and assessment over the past 18 months. The most immediate threat AI posed was to Academic Integrity with Higher Education Institutes (HEIs) focusing their efforts on combating the use of GenAI in assessment. Guidelines were developed for staff and students, policies put in place too. Innovative educators have forged paths in the use of Generative AI for teaching, learning and assessments leading to pockets of transformation springing up across HEIs, often with little or no top-down guidance, support or direction.
This Gasta posits a strategic approach to integrating AI into HEIs to prepare staff, students and the curriculum for an evolving world and workplace. We will highlight the advantages of working with these technologies beyond the realm of teaching, learning and assessment by considering prompt engineering skills, industry impact, curriculum changes, and the need for staff upskilling. In contrast, not engaging strategically with Generative AI poses risks, including falling behind peers, missed opportunities and failing to ensure our graduates remain employable. The rapid evolution of AI technologies necessitates a proactive and strategic approach if we are to remain relevant.
10. 協作資訊尋求
Collaborative Information Seeking
Shah, C. (2012). Collaborative information seeking: The art and science of making the whole greater than the sum
of all (The Information Retrieval Series) (p. 185). Berlin, Germany: Springer
30. PERCIRS
PERsonalized and Collaborative Information
Retrieval System
Naderi, H., & Rumpler, B. (2010). PERCIRS: a system to
combine personalized and collaborative information
retrieval. Journal of Documentation, 66(4), 532-562.
43. 參考文獻
朱海燕(2002)。行動數據服務業創新協同合作模式之研究。取自
http://nccuir.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/35358
吳美美(2012)。協作資訊尋求。雙語詞彙、學術名詞暨辭書資訊網。取自
http://terms.naer.edu.tw/detail/1679202/?index=10
吳美美與Foster(2009)。探究小組協作資訊尋求的成功與困難因素。教育資料與圖書館學,47(2),123-146.
邱銘心(2012)。意義建構理論(sense-making theory)。雙語詞彙、學術名詞暨辭書資訊網。取自
http://terms.naer.edu.tw/detail/1679177/
謝珍妮(2010)。科技機構研究人員協同合作與資訊行為之研究(未出版碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學,臺北市。
Austin, A. E., & Baldwin, R. G. (1991). Faculty Collaboration: Enhancing the Quality of Scholarship and Teaching.
ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 7, 1991. ERIC. Retrieved Jan. 19, 2016, from
http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED346805
Belkin, N. J., Kantor, P., Fox, E. A., & Shaw, J. A. (1995).Combining the evidence of multiple query
representations for information retrieval. Information Processing and Management, 31(3):431–448.
Chalmers, M. (2002). Awareness, representation and interpretation. Computer Supported Cooperative Work
(CSCW), 11(3–4):389–409.
Denning, P. J., & Yaholkovsky, P. (2008). Getting to “we”. Communications of the ACM, 51(4), 19-24.
Donath, J.S., & Robertson, N. (1994). The sociable Web. In Proceedings of the World Wide Web (WWW)
Conference. Geneva, Switzerland: CERN. Retrieved Jan. 19, 2016, from
http://smg.media.mit.edu/people/Judith/SocialWeb/SociableWeb.html
Fidel, R., Pejtersen, A. M., Bryan, C. & Bruce, H. (2004). A multidimensional approach to the study of human–
information interaction: a case study of collaborative information retrieval. Journal of the American Society for
Information Science and Technology, 55(11), 939–953.
44. 參考文獻
Foster, J. (2006). Collaborative information seeking and retrieval. Annual review of information science and
technology, 40(1), 329-356.
Golovchinsky, G., Adcock, J., Pickens, J., Qvarfordt, P., & Back, M. (2008). Cerchiamo: a collaborative exploratory
search tool. In Proceedings of Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).
Golovchinsky, G., Pickens, J., & Back, M. (2009). A taxonomy of collaboration in online information seeking. arXiv
preprint arXiv:0908.0704. Retrieved Jan. 19, 2016, from http://arxiv.org/abs/0908.0704
González-Ibáñez, R., Haseki, M., & Shah, C. (2013). Let’s search together, but not too close! An analysis of
communication and performance in collaborative information seeking. Information Processing &
Management, 49(5), 1165-1179.
Gray, B. (1989). Collaborating: Finding common ground for multiparty problems. Retrieved Jan. 19, 2016, from
https://www.ncjrs.gov/App/abstractdb/AbstractDBDetails.aspx?id=122117
Grudin, J. (1994). Groupware and social dynamics: eight challenges for developers. Communications of the ACM,
37(1), 92–105.
Gutwin, C. & Greenberg, S. (2002). A descriptive framework of workspace awareness for real-time groupware.
Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 11(3-4), 411-446.
Hansen, P., & Järvelin, K. (2005). Collaborative information retrieval in an information-intensive
domain. Information Processing & Management, 41(5), 1101-1119.
Hansen, P., Shah, C., Klas, C.-P. (2015). Collaborative information seeking: best practices, new domains and new
thoughts. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
Hertzum, M. (2008). Collaborative information seeking: The combined activity of information seeking and
collaborative grounding. Information Processing & Management, 44(2), 957-962.
Karamuftuoglu, M. (1998). Collaborative information retrieval: toward a social informatics view of IR
interaction. Journal of the American Society for Information Science (1986-1998), 49(12), 1070.
45. 參考文獻
Karunakaran, A., Reddy, M. C., & Spence, P. R. (2013). Toward a model of collaborative information behavior in
organizations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(12), 2437-2451.
Lai, K.-Y., Malone, T. W., & Yu, K.-C. (1988). Object lens: a “spreadsheet” for cooperative work. ACM Transactions
on Information Systems (TOIS), 6(4), 332-353.
London, S. (1995). Collaboration and community. Richmond, VA: Pew Partnership for Civic Change, University of
Richmond. Retrieved Dec. 29, 2016, from
http://www.upperskeena.ca/storytellers/CCL%20research/ccl/themes/micro-macro/collaboration.pdf
Malone, T. W., Grant, K. R., Turbak, F. A., Brobst, S. A., & Cohen, M. D. (1987). Intelligent information-sharing
systems. Communications of the ACM, 30(5), 390-402.
Morris, M. R., & Horvitz, E. (2007). SearchTogether: an interface for collaborative web search. In Proceedings of
the 20th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology(pp. 3-12). ACM.
Panitz, T. (1996). A definition of collaborative vs cooperative learning, 1996. Retrieved Jan. 19, 2016, from:
http://www. lgu. ac. uk/deliberations/collab. learning/panitz2.
Pickens, J., Golovchinsky, G., Shah, C., Qvarfordt, P., & Back, M. (2008). lgorithmic mediation for collaborative
exploratory search. In Proceedings of the Annual ACM Conference on Research and Development in nformation
Retrieval (SIGIR) (pp. 315-22). Singapore.
Reddy, M. C., & Jansen, B. J. (2008). A model for understanding collaborative information behavior in context: A
study of two healthcare teams. Information Processing & Management, 44(1), 256-273.
Roberts, N. C., & Bradley, R. T. (1991). Stakeholder collaboration and innovation: A study of public policy initiation
at the state level. The Journal of applied behavioral science, 27(2), 209-227.
Schmidt, K. (2002). The problem with ‘Awareness’: introductory remarks on ‘Awareness in CSCW’. Computer
Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 11(3), 285–298.
46. 參考文獻
Shah, C. (2008a). Toward collaborative information seeking (CIS). arXiv preprint arXiv:0908.0709. Retrieved Jan. 19,
2016, from http://arxiv.org/abs/0908.0709
Shah, C. (2008b). Understanding system implementation and user behavior in a collaborative information seeking
environment. In Proceedings of the 31st annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and
development in information retrieval (pp. 896–896). ACM. Retrieved Jan. 19, 2016, from
http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1390571
Shah, C. (2009). Lessons and challenges for Collaborative Information Seeking (CIS) systems developers. In
GROUP 2009 Workshop on Collaborative Information Behavior, Sanibel Island, Florida.
Shah, C. (2010). Coagmento - A Collaborative Information Seeking, Synthesis and Sense-Making Framework.
Integrated demo at Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW). Savannah, GA: February 6-11.
Shah, C. (2012). Collaborative Information Seeking - The Art and Science of Making the Whole Greater than the
Sum of All. Springer-Verlag.
Shah, C. (2013). Effects of awareness on coordination in collaborative information seeking. Journal of the
American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(6), 1122-1143.
Shah, C. (2014). Collaborative information seeking. Journal of the Association for Information Science and
Technology, 65(2), 215-236.
Shah, C., & Marchionini, G. (2010). Awareness in collaborative information seeking. Journal of the American
Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(10), 1970-1986.
Shah, C., Capra, R., & Hansen, P. (2014). Collaborative Information Seeking [Guest editors’
introduction]. Computer, 47(3), 22-25. Advance online publication. Doi: 10.1109/MC.2014.54
Shaw, J. A. & Fox, E. A. (1994). Combination of multiple searches. In Text (REtrieval) Conference, 105–108.
47. 參考文獻
Simone, C. & Bandini, S. (2002). Integrating awareness in cooperative applications through the reaction-diffusion
metaphor. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 11(3–4), 495–530.
Smyth, B., & others (2010). Social summarization in collaborative web search. Information processing &
management, 46(6), 782-798.
Sonnenwald, D. H. (1996). Communication roles that support collaboration during the design process. Design
studies, 17(3), 277-301.
Talja, S., & Hansen, P. (2006). Information sharing. In Spink, A., & Cole, C. (Eds.), New directions in human
information behavior (pp. 113-134). Springer Science & Business Media. Retrieved Jan. 19, 2016, from:
http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/1-4020-3670-1_7
Taylor-Powell, E., Rossing, B., & Geran, J. (1998). Evaluating collaboratives: Reaching the potential. University of
Wisconsin–Extension, Cooperative Extension, Program Development and Evaluation, Madison, WI.
Twidale, M., & Nichols, D. (1996). Collaborative browsing and visualisation of the search process. Aslib
Proceedings, 48(7-8), pp. 177-182. Retrieved Jan. 19, 2016, from:
http://eprints.lancs.ac.uk/53455/1/twidale_aslib_96.pdf
Villa, R., Gildea, N., Jose, J. M. (2008). A study of awareness in multimedia search. In: Proceedings ofthe 8th
ACM/IEEE-CS joint conference on digital libraries. ACM, New York, pp 221–230
Wilbur, S. B., & Young, R. E. (1988). The COSMOS project: a multi-disciplinary approach to design of computer
supported group working. Euteco, 88, 20–22.
Wilson, M. L. (2010). Evaluating collaborative information-seeking interfaces with a search-oriented inspection
method and re-framed information seeking theory.Information processing & management, 46(6), 718–732.