The document provides a comprehensive overview of cognitive neuroscience, detailing its history, methodologies, and key findings. It discusses the evolution of understanding brain functions through experimentation, the importance of brain structure and function relation, and various techniques used to study these interactions such as neuroanatomy, neurophysiology, and neuropsychology. Additionally, it emphasizes the significance of technological advancements in shaping the field and addressing complex questions about brain-behavior relationships.

1. Cognitive Neuroscience
-Current Perspectives And Approaches
Vivek Misra
Research Fellow
The Institute of Neurological Sciences
VHS Multi-Specialty Hospital & Research Institute
Chennai. IN
vivek@uberbrain.net
http://www.uberbrain.net

2. A brief History of Cognitive Neuroscience
• Ancient humans although they wondered extensively about
the nature of human feelings, memories, attention,
communication, motion and many other ‘cognitive functions’,
they had one big problem.
Problem:
• They did not have the ability to systematically explore the
mind through experimentation.

3. A brief History of Cognitive Neuroscience
• But if you can observe, manipulate & measure then you can
start to determine how the brain gets its job done
Debrück (1986) ‘Mind From Matter?’
• If you want to understand how a biological system works then
a laboratory is needed and experiments are essential.

4. A brief History of Cognitive Neuroscience
• Enigma of whether the brain works in concert or
parts of the brain work independently is still the
focus of contemporary research
– face area
– specialised only for faces?
– or objects as well?

5. A brief History of Cognitive Neuroscience
• Franz Joseph Gall & J.G. Spurzheim
claimed that the
– brain was organised into 35 specific
functions
– founders of phrenology in the early
19th century
• Functions ranged from language and
colour perception to hope and self-
esteem
• If a person used one of the faculties
more than the others the brain
representation area grew (bump in the
skull idea!)

6. A brief History of Cognitive Neuroscience
• Gall and colleagues believed
that by studying carefully the
skull of a person you could go
a long way in describing the
personality of the person
inside the skull
• Anatomical Personology

7. A brief History of Cognitive Neuroscience
• P.J.M. Flourens (1794-1867) challenged Gall’s
localisation views
– bird experiments
• According to Flourens(1824) :‘All sensations, all
perceptions and all volitions occupy the same seat in
these (cerebral) organs. The faculty of sensation,
percept and volition is then essentially one faculty.’

8. A brief History of Cognitive Neuroscience
• In France Paul Broca treated a
man who had suffered from
stroke
• the patient could understand
language but could not speak
• the patient’s left frontal lobe
was damaged
• Broca’s area
3D MRI of human brain with Broca's area highlighted in red

9. A brief History of Cognitive Neuroscience
• The German Neuroloist Carl
Wernicke in 1876 reported a
stroke victim who could talk
freely but what he said made
little sense
• Patient could not understand
spoken or written language
• Wernicke’s area
3D MRI of human brain with Wernicke's area highlighted in blue

10. A brief History of Cognitive Neuroscience
• The most famous of all physiologists
was Brodmann who analysed the
cellular organisation of the cortex
and characterised fifty two distinct
regions
• It was soon discovered that the
cytoarchitectonically described
brain areas represent distinct brain
regions

12. A brief History of Cognitive Neuroscience
• The revolution in our understanding of the nervous system
was brought by Camillo Golgi (Italy) and Ramon y Cajal (Spain)
• Golgi developed a stain that impregnated individual neurons
• Cajal found that neurons are discrete entities
• He was also the first to suggest that neurons transmit
electrical information in only one directions from the
dendrites to the axonal tip

14. A brief History of Cognitive Neuroscience
• In the 20th century physiologist and neurologists continued
the debate over the holistic processing or the functional
localisation conflict in the field.
• And while the medical profession pioneered most of the
studies of how the brain worked, psychologists began to claim
that they could measure behaviours and indeed study the
mind.

15. A brief History of Cognitive Neuroscience
• The term Cognitive Neuroscience was first coined in a taxi in
the 70s and by that time a new mission was clearly required
• neuroscientists were discovering how the cerebral cortex
was organised and functioned in response to simple stimuli
• specific mechanisms were described, such as those relating
to visual perception by Hubel & Wiesel
• models were build to describe how single cells interact to
produce percepts
• and psychologists started to abandon the ideas of learning
and associationism and believed that the behaviours they
were interested in had biological origin and instantiation.

16. Mission Statement of Cognitive Neuroscience:
‘How the brain actually does
enable the mind?’

17. Anatomy of the Brain
• Brain = Cerebral Cortex
• Has two symmetrical Hemispheres
• Each hemisphere consists of large
sheets of layered neurons
• The human cortex is highly folded to
pack more cortical surface into the
skull.
• The surface area of the average
human cerebral cortex is about 2200
to 2400cm2
• The infolding of the cortical sheets
are the sulci and the crowns of the
folded tissue are called the gyri

18. Anatomy of the Brain
• The cortex has a high density of
cell bodies, the ‘grey matter’
• The underlying region is
composed primarily by axons of
neurons and is known as the
‘white matter’, they connect the
neurons of the cerebral cortex
to other locations in the brain

19. Anatomy of the Brain
• Cerebral Hemispheres have
four main subdivisions
– Frontal
– Parietal
– Temporal
– Occipital

20. The methods of Cognitive Neuroscience
1. Neuroanatomy
2. Neurophysiology
3. Neurology
4. Functional Neurosurgery
5. Cognitive Psychology
6. Computer Modelling
7. Converging Methods

21. 1. Neuroanatomy
• Primary concern of neuroanatomy is the pattern of
connectivity in the nervous system that allows information to
get from one site to another
– problem made difficult by:
• fact that neurons are not wired together in a simple fashion
• often innervated with many neurons
• Solution: Refinement of New Stains
• stains for cell bodies
• stains for axons
• have the characteristic that they are absorbed from specific chemicals and
therefore ‘colour’ specific targets

22. 2. Neurophysiology
• Structure is closely tied to function
• We cannot understand brain function from neuroanatomy alone
• Neural function depends on electrochemical processes and numerous
techniques exist to measure and manipulate neuron activity
• Some record cell activity in passive or active conditions and other
manipulate activity by electrical stimulation or chemical induction
a. Electrical Stimulation
b. Single Cell Recording
c. Lesions

23. A. Electrical Stimulation
• Early insights to cortical organisation were made by directly
stimulating the cortex of awake humans undergoing neurosurgery
• Pioneers, Penfield & jaspers (1954) explored the effect of small
electrical currents applied to the cortical surface
Stimulation of the
motor cortex:
movement
Stimulation of the
somatosensory area:
somatic sensation

24. B. Single-Cell Recording
• The most important technological
advance in neurophysiology has been
the development of methods to
record directly the activity of single
neurons in laboratory animals.
• An thin electrode is inserted into an
animal’s brain (brain does not hurt!)
• The primary goal of single cell
recording experiments is to
determine experimental
manipulations that produce a
consistent change in the response
rate of a single neuron

25. C. Lesions
• Neurophysiologists have studied how behaviour is
altered by selectively removing one or more of
brain components.
• Logic: if a brain structure contributes to a task
then removing that structure should impair
performance in that task.
• Human cannot be subjected to such procedures,
so human neuropsychology requires patients with
naturally occuring lesions.

26. MRI scan of a normal and lesioned brain

27. 3. Neurology
• Human pathology has provided key insights to the relation between the brain
and behaviour
• Postmortem studies by early neurologists such as Broca and Wernicke were
instrumental in linking the left hemisphere with language functions
• By selecting patients with a single neurological impairment, we can best link
brain structures to specific cognitive functions.
• Sometimes patients have diffused damage and then conclusions are harder to
draw.
– Structural imaging of neurological damage (CT) helps define the damage
(advanced method of x-ray studies)
• Causes of Neurological Disorders
– vascular disorders (ie strokes)
– tumours
– degenerative and infectious diseases (MS, Huntington’s Disease)
– trauma
• Functional Neurosurgery (lobectomy)

28. Phineas Gage Case
• Most famous patient who survived severe brain damage
• He was a railway construction worker who got injured by an accidental
explosion
• Severe personality change after the accident

29. 4. Cognitive Psychology
• Cognitive Psychology assumes that our perceptions, thoughts
and actions depend on internal transformations or
computations
– Mental Representation and Transformations
• information processing depends on internal representation
» ball rolls down a hill -pictorial representation better than one
that encompasses the laws of physics
• mental representations undergo transformations
» imagine two letters presented in a screen one vertical the other
one rotated in order to decide if they are the same or different
you transform them to be into the same position
– Constrains on Information Processing
• exploring the limitation in task performance
» Stroop task

30. Tell Me The Font Color As Fast As You Can

31. 5. Computer Modelling
• Models are explicit
– they can be analysed in detail, the way the computer represents the
process must be completely specified
• Representation in Computer Models
– models differ greatly in their representations (ie. symbolic of object
recognition would have units that represent visual features such as
corners)
• Models lead to Testable Predictions
• Limitations with computer models
– radically simplified and limited in their scope
– some of their requirements come in contrast with what we know about
living organisms
– restricted to narrow problems
– modelling often also occurs in isolation to current theories

32. 7. Converging Methods
• Cognitive Deficits Following Brain Damage
• Single and Double Dissociations
• Groups versus individuals
• Imaging the Healthy Brain

33. Single and Double Dissociations
• Single dissociation
 Two groups differ on one critical behavioral task
 One group has a particular brain lesion, the other doesn't (the
other group is usually a control group who is considered
healthy and without any known brain abnormality)
 We then tentatively conclude that the difference on the
behavioral task is due to the brain lesion
 This, in turn, suggests that the brain region that is lesioned
probably was responsible for some aspect of the behavior
being studied
 However, this connection is not guaranteed to be the case

34. Single and Double Dissociations
• Problems with interpreting a single dissociation:
 The task measuring the behaviour may not be sensitive to the true
underlying behaviour that is disrupted
 The task may reflect something similar to, or a derivative of, or part
of the real behaviour that brain region is involved in, but it may not
be a completely accurate measure
 The behavioural change, though apparently narrow in scope, may
be part of a broader behavioural change that we haven't yet
identified
 The lesioned brain area may also affect other brain areas
responsible for producing this and related behaviours

35. Single and Double Dissociations
• Double dissociation
 Two groups differ, in different ways, on two different behavioral tasks
 Usually, the two groups each have different types of brain lesions
 For example, one patient with Broca's area damaged and another patient
with Wernicke's area damaged
 The first patient shows difficulty producing speech, while speech
comprehension is apparently normal
 The second patient shows difficulty comprehending speech, while speech
production is apparently normal
 We conclude, fairly confidently, that Broca's area is responsible for speech
production while Wernicke's area is responsible for speech
comprehension

36. Single and Double Dissociations
• Double dissociations are more powerful than single dissociations because
we can isolate fairly specific behaviours that change with one type of
lesion but don't change with a different type of lesion
• The problems with the task (how sensitive it is to the actual behavioural
change) are still a concern, but we are more confident with conclusions
about brain localization when there are double dissociations

37. Groups versus individuals
• Individual case studies
 Study one individual carefully with a known brain deficit
 If there is a specific behavioural deficit (after careful testing), it can be
correlated with the known brain deficit
 And if two case studies are compared, each with different lesions, and double
dissociations are found, we have strong confirmation for the link between
behavior and brain region
 We are, of course, concerned that one individual case study may not reflect a
larger population
 If you are familiar with statistical analysis, you should know that one
research subject (N=1) is not very useful in statistical analyses
 We cannot know for sure that the behavioural deviations from normality
are due to the brain deficit and not just because this person was different
(with or without the brain deficit)

38. Groups versus individuals
• Group studies
 In this approach, we compare groups of people with similar brain deficits and
determine if they show a consistent pattern of behavioural deficits
 This minimizes the chance that individual differences are masking the results of
brain damage
 The bottom row shows the proportion of overlap for a given brain region
 So we would be fairly confident that the areas of highest overlap were most
likely involved in producing the behavioral deficit
 Comparing across brains is not trivial, however, because of individual variation
 To accomplish this, individual brains are matched to a "standard" brain
 The common technique is to use the Talairach brain--the brain of a French
woman
 After matching certain landmark features, the image of a brain is distorted
until it matches the Talairach brain
 Then all the brains are compared from this common, standard brain image

39. Imaging the Healthy Brain
• Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)
 The goal of this technique is to intentionally induce a temporary "lesion"
 As far as we know, the brain is not damaged in any way, but a region is
temporarily deactivated
 A strong electrical signal is sent to a region of the scalp
 We don't exactly know how this works, but it seems to disrupt neural
function
 So for a very brief period of time, the behaviours associated with the
focus of the TMS should be impaired
 There is some control over the location of the "lesion," but the precision is
limited
 The device that administers the electrical pulse is fairly large
 It is usually held in place manually, lacking much precision

40. Imaging the Healthy Brain
Scalp recordings
 Electroencephalogram (EEG)
 Passively measure electrical activity from neurons that
reaches the scalp
 Place electrodes on the scalp to record electrical activity
 Hook the electrodes to an amplifier to boost the signal (very
little neurally generated electricity will reach the scalp)
 Have a representation of global neural activity
 Very useful for determining sleep patterns

42. Imaging the Healthy Brain
 Event-related potential (ERP)
 The development of ERPs is when the EEG became
useful as an experimental tool
 The procedure involves time-locking an EEG recording
to the onset of a particular stimulus or behaviour
 One EEG reading is very noisy; i.e. the electrical signal is
very chaotic and variable
 But if we measure EEG multiple events of the same
type, all time-locked to the onset of the event, and
average them together, a smooth pattern arises

43. Imaging the Healthy Brain
• Magnetoencephalogram (MEG)
 The methodology of MEG is very similar to the methodology for
ERP
 The sensors for MEG are actually measuring magnetic fields
produced by neurons, not electrical signals
 The inverse problem still exists for MEG, but because there is less
distortion of the magnetic signal than there is for the electrical
signal, the solutions end up being more accurate, on the whole
 However, this technique is extremely expensive ($1 million for a
reasonably good set-up)

44. Imaging the Healthy Brain
• Positron-emission tomography (PET)
 Methodology:
 Water labelled with radioactive oxygen, is injected into a subject
 Brain cells require oxygen (and glucose) for energy
 The radioactive oxygen is unstable enough that protons break off and
collide with electrons in the brain
 These collisions are measured by a PET scanner
 With this technique, we do not directly measure neural activity
 It is assumed that the higher concentration of radioactive isotopes
reflects higher neural activity
 The more active a neuron is, the more energy it should need to
replenish and the more likely the radioactive oxygen will enter into
that brain region

45. Imaging the Healthy Brain
 We use the subtraction method to determine relative levels of neural
activity
 PET scans are taken separately for two experimental conditions
 The two conditions are identical except for one feature--the behavior being
studied
 Then one PET images are subtracted from the other, so the resulting
difference should reflect the defining feature
 So if Task 1 required Processes A, B and C, and Task 2 required Processes A, B,
C and D, the difference between the PET images for Tasks 1 and 2 should
reflect the activity unique to Process D
 One consideration when using PET as an experimental technique is that it
takes 20-45 minutes for the radioactive isotope to get flushed out of the
brain
 So each experimental condition takes that long, meaning it is impossible
to compare too many conditions in one PET experiment

47. Imaging the Healthy Brain
• Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI)
 The BOLD response
 BOLD stands for Blood Oxygen Level Dependent
 What is measured is dependent on the levels of oxygen in the blood for
any local region of the brain
 When oxygen is used by cells, the result is the blood becomes more
deoxygenated
 Deoxygenated hemoglobin is more ferromagnetic (the iron in the blood is
more prominent), which is what the MRI scanner can measure
 Basically, fMRI measures the ratio of deoxygenated to oxygenated
hemoglobin

48. Imaging the Healthy Brain
• Subtraction method is one technique also used with fMRI
 Present variations of a task that each differ in one respect
 These differences may be different levels of a single cognitive dimension (e.g.,
different amounts of visual information presented) or they could be
completely different cognitive functions
 Contrast the fMRI signal from these conditions with each other and with the
signal from a control condition, when the extra cognitive function was not
present (but everything else was)
 These subtractive differences are reported as correlating with changes in
behavior
 Many different variations are possible with fMRI, unlike PET, because it is not
necessary to wait minutes between conditions
 We can use alternating epochs of a fixed length of time doing each variation
of the task

50. Concluding Remarks
• Advances in science are often fueled by technological
developments
• The maturation of cognitive neuroscience as a
scientific field provides a tremendous impetus for
the development of new methods
• The questions we ask are constrained by the
methods available but new research tools are
promoted by the questions we ask.

51. Any Questions ?
Email: vivek@uberbrain.net

52. 54
Thank You