Starbucks
“The only thing that we learn from history is
 that we do not learn from history.” -Hegel
Starbucks expands…

         • Starbucks expands
           stores rapidly

         • Expanded offerings
…and fails

     • Finds itself on the brink
       of failure
     • Stock price is down
     • Brand value declining
Why did it happen?
• Expansion, in store numbers and offerings, did
  not match with starbucks based on brand
  management principles
  – Brand Identity & Personality
  – CVP
  – Brand Equity
Brand Identity
• Product
  – High quality coffee for the individual who has the
    time and money to pay a high price for a cup of
    coffee they can enjoy.
• Organization
  – Socially responsible with highly-paid and happy
    workers. Had a strong position in the premium
    coffee market that was hard to replicate or top.
Brand Identity
• Person
  – Jennifer Aaker would say starbucks brand
    personality can be found in Sophistication (upper
    class coffee), Competence (reliable, intelligent
    baristas), and Sincerity (like your neighborhood
    café).
  – It represent camaraderie, community, bringing
    people together.
  – It represents stopping to smell the roses, or in their
    case, the coffee beans.
Brand Identity-symbol
CVP-Functional
• Starbucks produced a cup of coffee that was
  at least perceived as high quality/premium.

• The customer service was excellent.

• Drinks were very customizable

• The environment had couches, wi-fi, etc.
CVP-Emotional
For this section, we decided to do some
qualitative research using social media, what
follows are some of the responses we received:
CVP-Emotional

 ”I Iike how you can hear the hustle
  and bustle of men and women in
    business getting their morning
coffees and see some of them sitting
 there doing work.” – Phung Pham
CVP-Emotional

” You can relax and its more of
 the coffee house feel. you can
  enjoy your coffee.” – Phung
            Pham
CVP-Emotional

” And most starbucks have this
 kind of loungey feel to them.”
      – Danielle Sandahl
CVP-Emotional
  ” Starbucks is the absolute BEST!!!
      My husband and I could be
    broke, but we'll scrounge up a
     couple of bucks just to buy a
drink...even if we have to split it. We
like to call it "Christmas in a Cup". –
                  Corie
CVP-Emotional

 ” Its very "cozy" and you feel like at
  home. I could stay there for hours
just talking, reading or on my PC ". –
                 Corie
CVP-Emotional
Emotionally, Starbucks provides this luxury feel.
You feel like you’re treating yourself when you
go to Starbucks. It’s what they build with the
environment, the couches, the lounge music, the
coffee mugs, the smells, the people, all of it boils
down to selling luxury.
CVP-Emotional
To echo Minoli of Ducati, Starbucks is not in the
coffee business, they are in the experience
business. That experience is vital.
CVP - Self-Expressive
Starbucks also allows people to express
themselves through consuming their service. For
this I also went to qualitative research in
addition to stuff we learned in class.
CVP – Self-Expressive

 ” I like pretending I have a busy life
    and somewhere to go and am
    European ” – Emma Pedersen
CVP - Self-Expressive
Starbucks operates as a luxury for the masses.
It’s more expensive than most other coffees but
as a portion of income it’s relatively small. It
allows people to telegraph to the world that
they are high-class, that they will not sacrifice
on their coffee nor their enjoyment.
So What Went Wrong?
• We believe Starbucks began a
  downward spiral because it ineffectively
  pursued an Aaker expansion strategy.
• It violated it’s core, CVP, and brand
  personality on many levels through its
  actions during the expansion process.
Commoditization
• Rapid expansion of the number of stores, first
  and foremost, began the process of failure.
  When there’s a “starbucks on every
  corner”, it’s hard to imagine Starbucks as the
  neighborhood café as opposed to a chain.
Commoditization
• Further, the rapid expansion created a need
  for efficiencies. There’s few reasons to expand
  if you cannot reach economies of scale and
  greater efficiencies.
The movement from Marzocco manual machines to
automatic espresso machines “removed much of the
romance and theatre that was in play with the use of
the La Marzocca machines” as Howard Schultz says.
He further explained “This specific
decision became even more damaging
when the height of the machines, which
are now in thousands of stores, blocked
the visual sight line the customer
previously had to watch the drink being
made, and for the intimate experience
with the barista”
“Clearly we have had to streamline store
design to gain efficiencies of scale and to
make sure we had the ROI on sales to
investment ratios that would satisfy the
financial side of our business.
However, one of the results has been
stores that no longer have the soul of the
past and reflect a chain of stores vs. the
warm feeling of a neighborhood store.”
Their Failures
• Starbucks ice
cream
  –In Grocery
   Stores, not
   experiential
• Breakfast
Sandwiches
  –Instead of
   coffee, you smelt
   sausage
• Seating
 –Some have little
  to no seating
Starbucks
Starbucks failed because they left their
   identity and they lost touch of the
 starbucks experience, the very soul of
the brand. Their CVP was entirely out-
   of-whack and they paid the price
Howard Schultz came in on his majestic
steed, sword pointed forth, proclaiming to the
heavens:



               “Huzzah! Back to
               the core we must
                 go! Charge!”
Yup.
• He removed the coffee from the
  logo...revolutionary…brilliant
  – Ahem, sarcasm intended
Why?
We believe it came from the
questions “Is Coffee in our core? Are
we too strongly associated with
coffee? Are we in the product
attribute and product image traps?”
Yup.
• We believe the answer to those
  questions is “Yup.”
• “But, isn’t that good? Doesn’t that
  mean he recognizes that they are not
  in the coffee biz, but in the
  experience biz? Can’t they fix things
  now with that knowledge?”
Nope.
The jury is still out, but their actions
  have not been indicative of a
movement to the soul of the brand.
Trenta
The first factor is the introduction of
  the Trenta size. Intrinsically, the
Trenta just felt “wrong”. Something
about it just struck a bad chord. So
      we took it to Facebook.
What customer do you
think they are targeting
  with the new Trenta
   sizes at Starbucks?
“addicts”
 -Sharon Tam
“People see the bigger size
and think its a better value
($/oz) and they are getting
  more for their money.”
        -Jill Montane
“People who are addicted
to the coffee, and therefore
need a big cup and get it to
 go. They don't care about
   the experience at all.”
        -Mike Gray
“People that have places to go
in the morning and dont want
 a pussy cup of coffee or to sit
  around a god damn coffee
  shop (but are too good for
     dunkin coffee)-Emma
           Pedersen
“Also, what Emma
said.” –Mike Gray
Value?
They are targeting a value customer
   with the Trenta size. They are
 targeting addicts, people on-the-
  go, people who drink coffee for
coffee and not coffee for Starbucks.
Instant.
Instant.
Instant. Instant Coffee. Instant coffee that
can be made at home, out of a condiment
package. Does that sound like a failure to
you?
Not yet?
          Let me rephrase:
    “Oh glorious consumer who
perceives that our in-store coffee is
 superior to others’ coffee and will
  pay higher prices, little did you
  know that our coffee tastes like
           instant coffee.”
Still nothing?
           Let me rephrase:
 “Here, buy this coffee for a fraction
of the price, we promise it tastes just
like our in-store coffee. While you’re
   at it, purchase one of the same
  mugs we serve you with in store.”
A little more?
            Let me rephrase:
   “Please, by all means consume our
coffee in a cold kitchen with appliances
 for company and zero of the comforts
        of Starbucks restaurants”
Not quite?
        One last rephrase:
  “Experience? I thought you just
   wanted a cheap, pretty okay
tasting coffee that could be made
         quick and easy.”
”It just doesn't taste the
same when you make it
   yourself at home.” –
  RubyMae from Flickr
There we go.
    Starbucks clearly has not learned it’s lesson.
     Trenta sizes, instant coffee, drive-thrus, no
seating, higher emphasis on grocery sales. I can’t
 wait until they introduce “artisan” burgers and
  donuts, maybe a nice chicken sandwich and a
    Super Big Gulp. You know what would be
awesome? A little in-store coffee machine where
 I can just pour my coffee and pay without ever
              speaking with a barista!
Oh, wait.
 “Starbucks is testing letting its customers
   pour their own coffee at some stores.
Customers can pay before or after getting
their own drip coffee from a brewer near
the condiment bar, the company said on
   its new customer-feedback website.”
Starbucks
“The only thing that we learn from history is
 that we do not learn from history.” -Hegel

Coffee Wars -- Why Starbucks Will Not Win

  • 1.
    Starbucks “The only thingthat we learn from history is that we do not learn from history.” -Hegel
  • 2.
    Starbucks expands… • Starbucks expands stores rapidly • Expanded offerings
  • 3.
    …and fails • Finds itself on the brink of failure • Stock price is down • Brand value declining
  • 4.
    Why did ithappen? • Expansion, in store numbers and offerings, did not match with starbucks based on brand management principles – Brand Identity & Personality – CVP – Brand Equity
  • 5.
    Brand Identity • Product – High quality coffee for the individual who has the time and money to pay a high price for a cup of coffee they can enjoy. • Organization – Socially responsible with highly-paid and happy workers. Had a strong position in the premium coffee market that was hard to replicate or top.
  • 6.
    Brand Identity • Person – Jennifer Aaker would say starbucks brand personality can be found in Sophistication (upper class coffee), Competence (reliable, intelligent baristas), and Sincerity (like your neighborhood café). – It represent camaraderie, community, bringing people together. – It represents stopping to smell the roses, or in their case, the coffee beans.
  • 7.
  • 8.
    CVP-Functional • Starbucks produceda cup of coffee that was at least perceived as high quality/premium. • The customer service was excellent. • Drinks were very customizable • The environment had couches, wi-fi, etc.
  • 9.
    CVP-Emotional For this section,we decided to do some qualitative research using social media, what follows are some of the responses we received:
  • 10.
    CVP-Emotional ”I Iikehow you can hear the hustle and bustle of men and women in business getting their morning coffees and see some of them sitting there doing work.” – Phung Pham
  • 11.
    CVP-Emotional ” You canrelax and its more of the coffee house feel. you can enjoy your coffee.” – Phung Pham
  • 12.
    CVP-Emotional ” And moststarbucks have this kind of loungey feel to them.” – Danielle Sandahl
  • 13.
    CVP-Emotional ”Starbucks is the absolute BEST!!! My husband and I could be broke, but we'll scrounge up a couple of bucks just to buy a drink...even if we have to split it. We like to call it "Christmas in a Cup". – Corie
  • 14.
    CVP-Emotional ” Itsvery "cozy" and you feel like at home. I could stay there for hours just talking, reading or on my PC ". – Corie
  • 15.
    CVP-Emotional Emotionally, Starbucks providesthis luxury feel. You feel like you’re treating yourself when you go to Starbucks. It’s what they build with the environment, the couches, the lounge music, the coffee mugs, the smells, the people, all of it boils down to selling luxury.
  • 16.
    CVP-Emotional To echo Minoliof Ducati, Starbucks is not in the coffee business, they are in the experience business. That experience is vital.
  • 17.
    CVP - Self-Expressive Starbucksalso allows people to express themselves through consuming their service. For this I also went to qualitative research in addition to stuff we learned in class.
  • 18.
    CVP – Self-Expressive ” I like pretending I have a busy life and somewhere to go and am European ” – Emma Pedersen
  • 19.
    CVP - Self-Expressive Starbucksoperates as a luxury for the masses. It’s more expensive than most other coffees but as a portion of income it’s relatively small. It allows people to telegraph to the world that they are high-class, that they will not sacrifice on their coffee nor their enjoyment.
  • 20.
    So What WentWrong? • We believe Starbucks began a downward spiral because it ineffectively pursued an Aaker expansion strategy. • It violated it’s core, CVP, and brand personality on many levels through its actions during the expansion process.
  • 21.
    Commoditization • Rapid expansionof the number of stores, first and foremost, began the process of failure. When there’s a “starbucks on every corner”, it’s hard to imagine Starbucks as the neighborhood café as opposed to a chain.
  • 22.
    Commoditization • Further, therapid expansion created a need for efficiencies. There’s few reasons to expand if you cannot reach economies of scale and greater efficiencies.
  • 23.
    The movement fromMarzocco manual machines to automatic espresso machines “removed much of the romance and theatre that was in play with the use of the La Marzocca machines” as Howard Schultz says.
  • 24.
    He further explained“This specific decision became even more damaging when the height of the machines, which are now in thousands of stores, blocked the visual sight line the customer previously had to watch the drink being made, and for the intimate experience with the barista”
  • 25.
    “Clearly we havehad to streamline store design to gain efficiencies of scale and to make sure we had the ROI on sales to investment ratios that would satisfy the financial side of our business. However, one of the results has been stores that no longer have the soul of the past and reflect a chain of stores vs. the warm feeling of a neighborhood store.”
  • 26.
    Their Failures • Starbucksice cream –In Grocery Stores, not experiential
  • 27.
    • Breakfast Sandwiches –Instead of coffee, you smelt sausage
  • 28.
    • Seating –Somehave little to no seating
  • 29.
    Starbucks Starbucks failed becausethey left their identity and they lost touch of the starbucks experience, the very soul of the brand. Their CVP was entirely out- of-whack and they paid the price
  • 30.
    Howard Schultz camein on his majestic steed, sword pointed forth, proclaiming to the heavens: “Huzzah! Back to the core we must go! Charge!”
  • 32.
    Yup. • He removedthe coffee from the logo...revolutionary…brilliant – Ahem, sarcasm intended
  • 33.
    Why? We believe itcame from the questions “Is Coffee in our core? Are we too strongly associated with coffee? Are we in the product attribute and product image traps?”
  • 34.
    Yup. • We believethe answer to those questions is “Yup.” • “But, isn’t that good? Doesn’t that mean he recognizes that they are not in the coffee biz, but in the experience biz? Can’t they fix things now with that knowledge?”
  • 35.
    Nope. The jury isstill out, but their actions have not been indicative of a movement to the soul of the brand.
  • 37.
    Trenta The first factoris the introduction of the Trenta size. Intrinsically, the Trenta just felt “wrong”. Something about it just struck a bad chord. So we took it to Facebook.
  • 38.
    What customer doyou think they are targeting with the new Trenta sizes at Starbucks?
  • 39.
  • 40.
    “People see thebigger size and think its a better value ($/oz) and they are getting more for their money.” -Jill Montane
  • 41.
    “People who areaddicted to the coffee, and therefore need a big cup and get it to go. They don't care about the experience at all.” -Mike Gray
  • 42.
    “People that haveplaces to go in the morning and dont want a pussy cup of coffee or to sit around a god damn coffee shop (but are too good for dunkin coffee)-Emma Pedersen
  • 43.
  • 44.
    Value? They are targetinga value customer with the Trenta size. They are targeting addicts, people on-the- go, people who drink coffee for coffee and not coffee for Starbucks.
  • 45.
  • 46.
    Instant. Instant. Instant Coffee.Instant coffee that can be made at home, out of a condiment package. Does that sound like a failure to you?
  • 47.
    Not yet? Let me rephrase: “Oh glorious consumer who perceives that our in-store coffee is superior to others’ coffee and will pay higher prices, little did you know that our coffee tastes like instant coffee.”
  • 48.
    Still nothing? Let me rephrase: “Here, buy this coffee for a fraction of the price, we promise it tastes just like our in-store coffee. While you’re at it, purchase one of the same mugs we serve you with in store.”
  • 49.
    A little more? Let me rephrase: “Please, by all means consume our coffee in a cold kitchen with appliances for company and zero of the comforts of Starbucks restaurants”
  • 50.
    Not quite? One last rephrase: “Experience? I thought you just wanted a cheap, pretty okay tasting coffee that could be made quick and easy.”
  • 52.
    ”It just doesn'ttaste the same when you make it yourself at home.” – RubyMae from Flickr
  • 53.
    There we go. Starbucks clearly has not learned it’s lesson. Trenta sizes, instant coffee, drive-thrus, no seating, higher emphasis on grocery sales. I can’t wait until they introduce “artisan” burgers and donuts, maybe a nice chicken sandwich and a Super Big Gulp. You know what would be awesome? A little in-store coffee machine where I can just pour my coffee and pay without ever speaking with a barista!
  • 54.
    Oh, wait. “Starbucksis testing letting its customers pour their own coffee at some stores. Customers can pay before or after getting their own drip coffee from a brewer near the condiment bar, the company said on its new customer-feedback website.”
  • 56.
    Starbucks “The only thingthat we learn from history is that we do not learn from history.” -Hegel