COMPARATIVE LAW:
LAW IN OTHER
CULTURES
Chapter 14
Importance of Comparative Law
• All societies develop rules for assuring peace, order, predictability,
and cultural survival
• May differ enormously from society to society
• Important to have knowledge of legal systems other than our own
• Provides us with new understanding and appreciation of our own
• Will better equip us to identify its strengths and weaknesses
Law in Preliterate Bands and
Tribes
• Preliterate societies
• Have no written language
• What is a crime?
• A violation of a criminal statute
• Must be written
• Can preliterate people commit crime?
• Homicide and theft
• Social control concern central concern to all organized groups
• These cultures ruled by customs as rigid and inviolable as law
Law in Preliterate Bands and
Tribes
• Bands
• Small groups of hunters and gatherers
• Tribe
• Larger groups who augment hunting and gathering with agriculture
• No formal agents of social control
• Exposure to informal pressures to conformity
Law in Preliterate Bands and
Tribes
• Inuits and self-redress
• Ultimate form
• Aggrieved party would kill offender
• Alternate for: Song duel
• Participants hurl sung insults at one another
• Witnessed by crowd, which declares winner
• Decision concludes matter
• Group response to offender
• Ostracism and banishment
Law in Preliterate Bands and
Tribes
• Modern Inuits have lost effective traditional social control
mechanisms
• Been replaced by formalized laws
• Tribal social control
• Hurons and fines paid by claim
• Witchcraft and treason were crimes against society
• Huron have also been modernized
• Now live under laws of jurisdiction in which they reside
• Some have own systems within reservations
Law in the ModernWorld:The
FourTraditions
• Four main traditions of law in the world:
• Common law
• Civil law
• Socialist law
• Islamic law
• Numerous systems exist:
• Each unique
• Just about all related in some degree to main four
• Some voluntarily or involuntarily borrow elements
• Some are hybrids of one or more
• Even among members of same, differences exist
Comparative Law
Source: Adapted from percentages provided by Reichel (2005).
Percent
Common Law
• Originated in England and influence spread throughout world
• India is world’s most populous common la country
• Not fully common law
• No system is imported whole
• Still remains major source of modern criminal law in most English
speaking countries
• Limited influence outside English speaking countries
Historical Aspects of Common
Law
• Traced to Norman Conquest of England (1066)
• Means of unifying England
• Increasing royal power at expense of feudal lords
• Fashioned from local customs and practices
• Judge-made law
• Evolved over centuries in response to problems of common person
Basic Features of Common Law
• Common law distinguished from other systems in five important
ways:
• It is unwritten
• Its respect for precedent
• Its adversarial procedures
• Its use of grand and petit juries
• Its extensive use of judicial review
Basic Features of Common Law:
Unwritten
• Does not mean it is not literally written down or lacks precision of
meaning
• Common law has long history of producing revered documents
stressing rule of law
• Term used to distinguish its origin in customs of people
• United States judges retain modicum of old common law
lawmaking role
Basic Features of Common Law:
Respects Precedent
• Flows from its origin as case law
• Reflects accumulated wisdom of generations of judicial decisions
• Operates in vertical and horizontal dimensions
• Allows for predictability, consistency, and rationality
Basic Features of Common Law:
Adversarial
• Nature stems from “trial by combat” method of settling disputes
• Both prosecution and defense expected to vigorously pursue self-
interest
• Judges function as disinterested referees
• Judges do not play as active a role as in other legal traditions
Basic Features of Common Law:
Uses Grand and Petit Juries
• Indictment by grand jury and trial by jury are cherished procedures
• Traditionally viewed as bodies of citizens interposing themselves
between power of state and accused
• Expense of grand juries led to abolition in England and Canada
• Criticized as well
• Practical consideration have led to less use of trial juries than
previous
Basic Features of Common Law:
Uses Judicial Review
• Refers to judiciary’s examination of legality of actions and decisions
of executive and administrative officers of government
• As well as appellate review of lower court decisions
• Scope limited to various degrees in different countries
• Process follows roughly similar lines in all common law countries
Civil Law
• Most pervasive legal tradition in world
• Used in over half of world’s nations
• Sometimes called continental law or code law
• Avoids confusion with civil branch of common law countries
• Former Warsaw Pact nations have reverted to civil law systems
• Encompasses variety of systems that differ due to unique
developmental history in each country
Historical Origins of Civil Law
• Has longer history of development than common law
• Not so centered on one country
• Ancient Rome and nineteenth-century France and Germany
• TwelveTables (450 BCE)
• Code of Justinian (533 CE)
• Modern civil law owes most to NapoleonicCode (1804 CE)
Basic Features of Civil Law
• Typically developed after major social upheaval as result of distrust
of previous status quo
• French civil law
• Emphasizes communitarian values rather than individualistic
• Crime control system used
• Rights of victimized community
Basic Features of Civil Law:
Written
• Codes create civil law rather than revealing existent laws
• Laws replace, rather than supplement, previous law
• Emphasizes revolutionary nature
• Legal prescriptions and proscriptions outlined are mostly
consistent with norms and customs that prevailed at time of
publication
Basic Features of Civil Law: Precedent
Is Not Officially Recognized
• Codes laid down are complete the day they are enacted
• Not subject to judicial review
• No need to refer to past cases for guidance
• Code is guidance needed
• In practice, no code is complete
• Civil law judges often refer to and rely on case law and thus to precedent
• If used, is not binding and is tool of last resort
Basic Features of Civil Law:
Inquisitorial RatherThan Adversarial
• Primary distinguishing feature of civil law
• Term inquisitorial conjures up negative images
• Truth-seeking investigations and interviews
• Many procedural protections found in common law systems not
found
• Do provide some rights
• Process led by judge
• All parties expected to cooperate
Basic Features of Civil Law:
Inquisitorial RatherThan Adversarial
• Strong presumption of guilt if case goes to trial
• Investigation takes place under presumption of innocence
• Common law civil rights viewed as unnecessary
• Right to remain silent is formality with little force
• Doing so at trial may be legally considered as evidence of guilt
Basic Features of Civil Law: Has
Traditionally Made Little Use of Juries
• Used only for very serious crimes
• Do not have same role as in common law countries
• Juries consist of three judges and nine laypersons
• Jurors can question all other parties
• Trial judges are not investigating judge
Basic Features of Civil Law: Has
Traditionally Made Little Use of Juries
• Judges are active participants in trials
• Play all roles in common law systems
• Verdicts require agreement of at least eight of twelve
• If verdict is guilty
• Voting on penalty begins immediately
Basic Features of Civil Law:
Judicial Review Is Used Sparingly
• Three Supreme Courts in France
• Cour de Cassation
• Supreme in criminal and civil matters
• Conseil d’Etat
• Supreme in administrative matters
• Conseil Constitutionell
• Supreme in constitutional matters
• Equivalent to United States Supreme Court
• No judicial review of legislative statutes in most instances up until
2010
Basic Features of Civil Law:
Conseil Constitutionell
• ConstitutionalCouncil
• Used to be unique among national supreme courts
• Main function was to rule on constitutionality of proposed
legislation
• Has gradually become fully functional court since reforms of 2008
• Now possible for any citizen to raise issue of unconstitutionality
before lower court
• If decided constitutionally relevant, submitted to Constitutional Council
• Has drastically increased Council’s workload
Basic Features of Civil Law:
Cour de Cassation
• “To break” or “to smash”
• Courts of last resort
• Decisions involving criminal matters and private commercial
disputes are appealable
• Court sits in six chambers
• Each has fifteen judges
• Smashes erroneous decisions
• Decisions not binding on lower courts
• Only rule on points of law
Basic Features of Civil Law:
Types of Crime
• Three offense categories recognized
• Crimes
• Major offenses for which penalty can be from five years to life
imprisonment
• Tried in assize court
• Only court that uses juries
• Delicts
• Less serious offenses for which penalty can be up to five years
• Tried in correctional court
Basic Features of Civil Law:
Types of Crime
• Contraventions
• Minor offenses with maximum penalty of two months in jail
• Tried in police court
• Can be potential for abuse
• Bail infrequently granted due to operation based on crime control
model
• Trial more of forum for known facts
• System is one of professional bureaucracy
Socialist Law
• Originated in 1917 with Russian Revolution and USSR
• Based on codified Marxist/Leninist ideology
• Only system of law considering itself to be temporary anachronism
devoted to own demise
• Emphasizes communal values over individual rights
• Low-tolerance crime control
Chinese Socialist Law
• Scholars maintain Imperial China never developed sound rational-
formal legal system
• Influenced by Confucius
• Some point to Ch’ingCode (1646) as evidence of being at least
substantively rational
• 436 statutes and four thousand offenses for which punishment was
prescribed
Chinese Socialist Law: IsWritten
and Precedent Not Recognized
• Chinese legal system borrowed heavily from Soviet legal codes
• Present system established in 1954
• First code of criminal law and procedure adopted in 1979
• Under new code judiciary began to exercise small measure of
independent power
• Precedent has no place in Chinese system
• Law has always had high degree of flexibility in both substance and
procedure
Chinese Socialist Law: Is
Inquisitorial and Adversarial
• Mostly inquisitorial
• Emphasis on confessions
• Evidence never presented to defendants prior to trial
• Defendants can defend themselves in court, hire lawyer or
advocate
• Advocates see procedural law is observed and lenient sentences
received
Chinese Socialist Law: Uses a
Quasi-Jury System
• Collegial bench
• One to three professional judges
• Two to four lay people’s assessors
• No right to remain silent
• Defendant can argue with other actors
• Very punitive
Chinese Socialist Law: Death
Sentence
• Delayed
• Two-year suspension of sentence during which defendant must show
reformation
• If rehabilitated
• Sentence usually charged to long period of incarceration
• If not, they are executed
• Immediate
• Carried out within seven days of imposition of sentence
• Imposed when court deems defendant is beyond rehabilitation
• Execution is single shot at base of skull or, more recently, lethal injection
Chinese Socialist Law: Judicial
Review is Limited
• Severely limited
• Supreme People’s Court
• Answerable to Standing Committee of Chinese Communist Party
• Advisory opinions
• Does not hear cases from lower courts
Chinese Socialist Law: Hierarchy
of Chinese Courts
• Higher People’s Court
• Analogous to U.S. Supreme Court
• Intermediate People’s Court
• Prefecture level
• Original jurisdiction
• Basic People’s Court
• Analogous to U.S. District (felony) court
• Higher judicial review of outcome
• Appeals from both prosecutor and defendant
• Right to one appeal
Islamic Law
• Each country is different
• Vary in level of adherence to strict Qur’anic interpretations
• Fundamentalists insist on strict adherence
• Saudi Arabia
• Qur’an has served as constitution since birth of nation
• Lays out general principles that must be interpreted and applied to variety of
specific cases
Islamic Law: IsWritten
• Origins of law is Qur’an
• Shari’a
• “Path to follow”
• Three distinctions
• Based on direct revelation from God
• Attempts to regulate behavior and thought processes
• Does not require uniformity of law
Islamic Law: Hybrid
Inquisitorial/Adversarial System; Precedent
Absent; No Use of Juries
• Hybrid of inquisitorial and adversarial systems
• Strong emphasis on inquisitorial system
• System contains few procedural rules
• Have right to confront accusers and are assumed innocent until proven
guilty
• Court proceedings very informal byWestern standards
• Judge hears cases and makes decisions based on own distillation of facts
and testimony
• Not bound by precedent
• Do not use juries
Islamic Law: Crime and
Punishment
• Hudud crimes
• Fixed penalty crimes considered God prescribed
• No judge or legislative body can alter penalty for them
• Heard by panel of three judges
• Variations allowed according to circumstances
• Conviction requires confession or eyewitness testimony of at least two
adult males
• Muslims of impeccable character
Islamic Law: Crime and
Punishment
• Quesas crimes
• Means “equal harm” or “retaliation”
• Crimes committed against individuals rather than against God
• Penalties based on “eye for eye” philosophy
• Serious crimes, but not ones for which Qu’ran specifies a penalty
• Penalties can be negotiated or forgiven
Islamic Law: Crime and
Punishment
• Ta’azir crimes
• “discretion” or “deterrence” crimes
• Imposition of punishment is discretionary
• Penalties range from dressing down to some form of light corporal
punishment
• Purpose of punishment is discretionary
Islamic Law: Crime and
Punishment
• Hudud crimes least likely to result in death penalty
• Acts similar may be tried as quesas or ta’zir crime to assure conviction
and punishment
• Differentiation depends on circumstances
• Law does not normally allow legal representation in a trial
• Oath swearing
• Whoever swears oath, wins the case
Islamic Law: Judicial Review
Limited to Certain Crimes Only
• Appeals process may come into play after judgment is rendered
• Death sentences appealable only for ta’zir crime
• Must be filed up to thirty days after conviction
• Hudud crimes cannot be appealed
• Pardons and stays can be granted by king, just not for hudud crimes
• Death sentence for quesas murder may be appealed to victim’s
family only
The FourTraditions and the Rule
of Law
• Useful way of making comparisons is degree to which rule of law is
present
• Rule of Law has three important elements:
• Recognition that there are fundamental principles and values stressing
human dignity and value
• Values and principles are articulated and formalized in writing and
contained in revered documents
• Substantive laws and administrative procedures implemented to hold
state and its agents to those values and principles
The FourTraditions and the Rule
of Law
• Freedom House (Puddington, 2014)
• Ranks countries on scale of one through seven
• One is highest level of civil liberty
• Economist Intelligence Unit (2014)
• Ranks countries zero through ten
• Ten indicates highest civil liberty score
• United States rating
• 1 by Freedom House
• 8.11 by Economist Intelligence Unit
• Norway ranked highest; North Korea ranked lowest
The FourTraditions and the Rule
of Law: Civil Law (France)
• Exhibits first two elements of rule of law
• Addressing third requires care of legal ethnocentrism
• Does not lack due process procedures
• Simply have different ones intended to do different things than U.S.
• Rated same as United States on both scales
• 1 by Freedom House
• 8.11 by Economist Intelligence Unit
The FourTraditions and the Rule
of Law: Islamic Law
• Conforms to first two requirements of rule of law
• Provisions for procedures of implementation has not been major
concern
• Only some Islamic countries have secularized laws to provide
moderate due process rights
• Saudi Arabia rating
• 7 by Freedom House (worst possible score)
• 1.82 by Economist IntelligenceUnit (very low)
The FourTraditions and the Rule
of Law: Socialist Law
• Fails to meet any of the criteria for operating under rule of law
• Absent by design
• Subordinates itself to social policy
• Existing procedural rules are followed or not followed according to
needs of state at moment
• China rating
• 6 by Freedom House
• 3.0 by Economist Intelligence Unit
The Convergence of Systems
• As world becomes more complex and interdependent, cultures will
converge
• Results in systems of law coming into contact and becoming more similar
• Resulting in recognition of rule of law and individual rights
• Examples:
• International Court of Justice (World Court)
• European Court of Human Rights
• Does this apply to socialist and Islamic systems?

Chapter 14 power point

  • 1.
    COMPARATIVE LAW: LAW INOTHER CULTURES Chapter 14
  • 2.
    Importance of ComparativeLaw • All societies develop rules for assuring peace, order, predictability, and cultural survival • May differ enormously from society to society • Important to have knowledge of legal systems other than our own • Provides us with new understanding and appreciation of our own • Will better equip us to identify its strengths and weaknesses
  • 3.
    Law in PreliterateBands and Tribes • Preliterate societies • Have no written language • What is a crime? • A violation of a criminal statute • Must be written • Can preliterate people commit crime? • Homicide and theft • Social control concern central concern to all organized groups • These cultures ruled by customs as rigid and inviolable as law
  • 4.
    Law in PreliterateBands and Tribes • Bands • Small groups of hunters and gatherers • Tribe • Larger groups who augment hunting and gathering with agriculture • No formal agents of social control • Exposure to informal pressures to conformity
  • 5.
    Law in PreliterateBands and Tribes • Inuits and self-redress • Ultimate form • Aggrieved party would kill offender • Alternate for: Song duel • Participants hurl sung insults at one another • Witnessed by crowd, which declares winner • Decision concludes matter • Group response to offender • Ostracism and banishment
  • 6.
    Law in PreliterateBands and Tribes • Modern Inuits have lost effective traditional social control mechanisms • Been replaced by formalized laws • Tribal social control • Hurons and fines paid by claim • Witchcraft and treason were crimes against society • Huron have also been modernized • Now live under laws of jurisdiction in which they reside • Some have own systems within reservations
  • 7.
    Law in theModernWorld:The FourTraditions • Four main traditions of law in the world: • Common law • Civil law • Socialist law • Islamic law • Numerous systems exist: • Each unique • Just about all related in some degree to main four • Some voluntarily or involuntarily borrow elements • Some are hybrids of one or more • Even among members of same, differences exist
  • 8.
    Comparative Law Source: Adaptedfrom percentages provided by Reichel (2005). Percent
  • 9.
    Common Law • Originatedin England and influence spread throughout world • India is world’s most populous common la country • Not fully common law • No system is imported whole • Still remains major source of modern criminal law in most English speaking countries • Limited influence outside English speaking countries
  • 10.
    Historical Aspects ofCommon Law • Traced to Norman Conquest of England (1066) • Means of unifying England • Increasing royal power at expense of feudal lords • Fashioned from local customs and practices • Judge-made law • Evolved over centuries in response to problems of common person
  • 11.
    Basic Features ofCommon Law • Common law distinguished from other systems in five important ways: • It is unwritten • Its respect for precedent • Its adversarial procedures • Its use of grand and petit juries • Its extensive use of judicial review
  • 12.
    Basic Features ofCommon Law: Unwritten • Does not mean it is not literally written down or lacks precision of meaning • Common law has long history of producing revered documents stressing rule of law • Term used to distinguish its origin in customs of people • United States judges retain modicum of old common law lawmaking role
  • 13.
    Basic Features ofCommon Law: Respects Precedent • Flows from its origin as case law • Reflects accumulated wisdom of generations of judicial decisions • Operates in vertical and horizontal dimensions • Allows for predictability, consistency, and rationality
  • 14.
    Basic Features ofCommon Law: Adversarial • Nature stems from “trial by combat” method of settling disputes • Both prosecution and defense expected to vigorously pursue self- interest • Judges function as disinterested referees • Judges do not play as active a role as in other legal traditions
  • 15.
    Basic Features ofCommon Law: Uses Grand and Petit Juries • Indictment by grand jury and trial by jury are cherished procedures • Traditionally viewed as bodies of citizens interposing themselves between power of state and accused • Expense of grand juries led to abolition in England and Canada • Criticized as well • Practical consideration have led to less use of trial juries than previous
  • 16.
    Basic Features ofCommon Law: Uses Judicial Review • Refers to judiciary’s examination of legality of actions and decisions of executive and administrative officers of government • As well as appellate review of lower court decisions • Scope limited to various degrees in different countries • Process follows roughly similar lines in all common law countries
  • 17.
    Civil Law • Mostpervasive legal tradition in world • Used in over half of world’s nations • Sometimes called continental law or code law • Avoids confusion with civil branch of common law countries • Former Warsaw Pact nations have reverted to civil law systems • Encompasses variety of systems that differ due to unique developmental history in each country
  • 18.
    Historical Origins ofCivil Law • Has longer history of development than common law • Not so centered on one country • Ancient Rome and nineteenth-century France and Germany • TwelveTables (450 BCE) • Code of Justinian (533 CE) • Modern civil law owes most to NapoleonicCode (1804 CE)
  • 19.
    Basic Features ofCivil Law • Typically developed after major social upheaval as result of distrust of previous status quo • French civil law • Emphasizes communitarian values rather than individualistic • Crime control system used • Rights of victimized community
  • 20.
    Basic Features ofCivil Law: Written • Codes create civil law rather than revealing existent laws • Laws replace, rather than supplement, previous law • Emphasizes revolutionary nature • Legal prescriptions and proscriptions outlined are mostly consistent with norms and customs that prevailed at time of publication
  • 21.
    Basic Features ofCivil Law: Precedent Is Not Officially Recognized • Codes laid down are complete the day they are enacted • Not subject to judicial review • No need to refer to past cases for guidance • Code is guidance needed • In practice, no code is complete • Civil law judges often refer to and rely on case law and thus to precedent • If used, is not binding and is tool of last resort
  • 22.
    Basic Features ofCivil Law: Inquisitorial RatherThan Adversarial • Primary distinguishing feature of civil law • Term inquisitorial conjures up negative images • Truth-seeking investigations and interviews • Many procedural protections found in common law systems not found • Do provide some rights • Process led by judge • All parties expected to cooperate
  • 23.
    Basic Features ofCivil Law: Inquisitorial RatherThan Adversarial • Strong presumption of guilt if case goes to trial • Investigation takes place under presumption of innocence • Common law civil rights viewed as unnecessary • Right to remain silent is formality with little force • Doing so at trial may be legally considered as evidence of guilt
  • 24.
    Basic Features ofCivil Law: Has Traditionally Made Little Use of Juries • Used only for very serious crimes • Do not have same role as in common law countries • Juries consist of three judges and nine laypersons • Jurors can question all other parties • Trial judges are not investigating judge
  • 25.
    Basic Features ofCivil Law: Has Traditionally Made Little Use of Juries • Judges are active participants in trials • Play all roles in common law systems • Verdicts require agreement of at least eight of twelve • If verdict is guilty • Voting on penalty begins immediately
  • 26.
    Basic Features ofCivil Law: Judicial Review Is Used Sparingly • Three Supreme Courts in France • Cour de Cassation • Supreme in criminal and civil matters • Conseil d’Etat • Supreme in administrative matters • Conseil Constitutionell • Supreme in constitutional matters • Equivalent to United States Supreme Court • No judicial review of legislative statutes in most instances up until 2010
  • 27.
    Basic Features ofCivil Law: Conseil Constitutionell • ConstitutionalCouncil • Used to be unique among national supreme courts • Main function was to rule on constitutionality of proposed legislation • Has gradually become fully functional court since reforms of 2008 • Now possible for any citizen to raise issue of unconstitutionality before lower court • If decided constitutionally relevant, submitted to Constitutional Council • Has drastically increased Council’s workload
  • 28.
    Basic Features ofCivil Law: Cour de Cassation • “To break” or “to smash” • Courts of last resort • Decisions involving criminal matters and private commercial disputes are appealable • Court sits in six chambers • Each has fifteen judges • Smashes erroneous decisions • Decisions not binding on lower courts • Only rule on points of law
  • 29.
    Basic Features ofCivil Law: Types of Crime • Three offense categories recognized • Crimes • Major offenses for which penalty can be from five years to life imprisonment • Tried in assize court • Only court that uses juries • Delicts • Less serious offenses for which penalty can be up to five years • Tried in correctional court
  • 30.
    Basic Features ofCivil Law: Types of Crime • Contraventions • Minor offenses with maximum penalty of two months in jail • Tried in police court • Can be potential for abuse • Bail infrequently granted due to operation based on crime control model • Trial more of forum for known facts • System is one of professional bureaucracy
  • 31.
    Socialist Law • Originatedin 1917 with Russian Revolution and USSR • Based on codified Marxist/Leninist ideology • Only system of law considering itself to be temporary anachronism devoted to own demise • Emphasizes communal values over individual rights • Low-tolerance crime control
  • 32.
    Chinese Socialist Law •Scholars maintain Imperial China never developed sound rational- formal legal system • Influenced by Confucius • Some point to Ch’ingCode (1646) as evidence of being at least substantively rational • 436 statutes and four thousand offenses for which punishment was prescribed
  • 33.
    Chinese Socialist Law:IsWritten and Precedent Not Recognized • Chinese legal system borrowed heavily from Soviet legal codes • Present system established in 1954 • First code of criminal law and procedure adopted in 1979 • Under new code judiciary began to exercise small measure of independent power • Precedent has no place in Chinese system • Law has always had high degree of flexibility in both substance and procedure
  • 34.
    Chinese Socialist Law:Is Inquisitorial and Adversarial • Mostly inquisitorial • Emphasis on confessions • Evidence never presented to defendants prior to trial • Defendants can defend themselves in court, hire lawyer or advocate • Advocates see procedural law is observed and lenient sentences received
  • 35.
    Chinese Socialist Law:Uses a Quasi-Jury System • Collegial bench • One to three professional judges • Two to four lay people’s assessors • No right to remain silent • Defendant can argue with other actors • Very punitive
  • 36.
    Chinese Socialist Law:Death Sentence • Delayed • Two-year suspension of sentence during which defendant must show reformation • If rehabilitated • Sentence usually charged to long period of incarceration • If not, they are executed • Immediate • Carried out within seven days of imposition of sentence • Imposed when court deems defendant is beyond rehabilitation • Execution is single shot at base of skull or, more recently, lethal injection
  • 37.
    Chinese Socialist Law:Judicial Review is Limited • Severely limited • Supreme People’s Court • Answerable to Standing Committee of Chinese Communist Party • Advisory opinions • Does not hear cases from lower courts
  • 38.
    Chinese Socialist Law:Hierarchy of Chinese Courts • Higher People’s Court • Analogous to U.S. Supreme Court • Intermediate People’s Court • Prefecture level • Original jurisdiction • Basic People’s Court • Analogous to U.S. District (felony) court • Higher judicial review of outcome • Appeals from both prosecutor and defendant • Right to one appeal
  • 39.
    Islamic Law • Eachcountry is different • Vary in level of adherence to strict Qur’anic interpretations • Fundamentalists insist on strict adherence • Saudi Arabia • Qur’an has served as constitution since birth of nation • Lays out general principles that must be interpreted and applied to variety of specific cases
  • 40.
    Islamic Law: IsWritten •Origins of law is Qur’an • Shari’a • “Path to follow” • Three distinctions • Based on direct revelation from God • Attempts to regulate behavior and thought processes • Does not require uniformity of law
  • 41.
    Islamic Law: Hybrid Inquisitorial/AdversarialSystem; Precedent Absent; No Use of Juries • Hybrid of inquisitorial and adversarial systems • Strong emphasis on inquisitorial system • System contains few procedural rules • Have right to confront accusers and are assumed innocent until proven guilty • Court proceedings very informal byWestern standards • Judge hears cases and makes decisions based on own distillation of facts and testimony • Not bound by precedent • Do not use juries
  • 42.
    Islamic Law: Crimeand Punishment • Hudud crimes • Fixed penalty crimes considered God prescribed • No judge or legislative body can alter penalty for them • Heard by panel of three judges • Variations allowed according to circumstances • Conviction requires confession or eyewitness testimony of at least two adult males • Muslims of impeccable character
  • 43.
    Islamic Law: Crimeand Punishment • Quesas crimes • Means “equal harm” or “retaliation” • Crimes committed against individuals rather than against God • Penalties based on “eye for eye” philosophy • Serious crimes, but not ones for which Qu’ran specifies a penalty • Penalties can be negotiated or forgiven
  • 44.
    Islamic Law: Crimeand Punishment • Ta’azir crimes • “discretion” or “deterrence” crimes • Imposition of punishment is discretionary • Penalties range from dressing down to some form of light corporal punishment • Purpose of punishment is discretionary
  • 45.
    Islamic Law: Crimeand Punishment • Hudud crimes least likely to result in death penalty • Acts similar may be tried as quesas or ta’zir crime to assure conviction and punishment • Differentiation depends on circumstances • Law does not normally allow legal representation in a trial • Oath swearing • Whoever swears oath, wins the case
  • 46.
    Islamic Law: JudicialReview Limited to Certain Crimes Only • Appeals process may come into play after judgment is rendered • Death sentences appealable only for ta’zir crime • Must be filed up to thirty days after conviction • Hudud crimes cannot be appealed • Pardons and stays can be granted by king, just not for hudud crimes • Death sentence for quesas murder may be appealed to victim’s family only
  • 47.
    The FourTraditions andthe Rule of Law • Useful way of making comparisons is degree to which rule of law is present • Rule of Law has three important elements: • Recognition that there are fundamental principles and values stressing human dignity and value • Values and principles are articulated and formalized in writing and contained in revered documents • Substantive laws and administrative procedures implemented to hold state and its agents to those values and principles
  • 48.
    The FourTraditions andthe Rule of Law • Freedom House (Puddington, 2014) • Ranks countries on scale of one through seven • One is highest level of civil liberty • Economist Intelligence Unit (2014) • Ranks countries zero through ten • Ten indicates highest civil liberty score • United States rating • 1 by Freedom House • 8.11 by Economist Intelligence Unit • Norway ranked highest; North Korea ranked lowest
  • 49.
    The FourTraditions andthe Rule of Law: Civil Law (France) • Exhibits first two elements of rule of law • Addressing third requires care of legal ethnocentrism • Does not lack due process procedures • Simply have different ones intended to do different things than U.S. • Rated same as United States on both scales • 1 by Freedom House • 8.11 by Economist Intelligence Unit
  • 50.
    The FourTraditions andthe Rule of Law: Islamic Law • Conforms to first two requirements of rule of law • Provisions for procedures of implementation has not been major concern • Only some Islamic countries have secularized laws to provide moderate due process rights • Saudi Arabia rating • 7 by Freedom House (worst possible score) • 1.82 by Economist IntelligenceUnit (very low)
  • 51.
    The FourTraditions andthe Rule of Law: Socialist Law • Fails to meet any of the criteria for operating under rule of law • Absent by design • Subordinates itself to social policy • Existing procedural rules are followed or not followed according to needs of state at moment • China rating • 6 by Freedom House • 3.0 by Economist Intelligence Unit
  • 52.
    The Convergence ofSystems • As world becomes more complex and interdependent, cultures will converge • Results in systems of law coming into contact and becoming more similar • Resulting in recognition of rule of law and individual rights • Examples: • International Court of Justice (World Court) • European Court of Human Rights • Does this apply to socialist and Islamic systems?