This document provides design details for the superstructure of an 18m simple span reinforced concrete T-girder bridge, including:
1. Design specifications and material properties
2. Preliminary bridge dimensions and cross section
3. Loads and design moments for elements like the overhang slab, deck slab, and longitudinal girders
4. Reinforcement details calculated to resist bending moments in the overhang slab, deck slab, and girders
It includes load and resistance factor design calculations for elements of the bridge superstructure according to specifications like AASHTO and ERA bridge design manuals. Reinforcement amounts, sizes, and spacings are determined to satisfy strength and serviceability limit states.
This Presentation deals with the Design of a Cantilever Retaining Wall with no surcharge.
Please notify any errors you may find in the ppt.
thankyou for your time.
Analysis and Design of Residential building.pptxDP NITHIN
Complete introduction to the design and design concepts, design of structural
members like slabs, beams, columns, footing etc. along with their calculation and
Detailing through structural drawings.
This Presentation deals with the Design of a Cantilever Retaining Wall with no surcharge.
Please notify any errors you may find in the ppt.
thankyou for your time.
Analysis and Design of Residential building.pptxDP NITHIN
Complete introduction to the design and design concepts, design of structural
members like slabs, beams, columns, footing etc. along with their calculation and
Detailing through structural drawings.
Design of Football Stadium - Design Project for Civil EngineersIndhumathi1134
Project covers the planning and design of Football Stadium, which includes the design of Staircase, Beam & Column manually done using IS:456-2000 & SP-16
Sachpazis:Terzaghi Bearing Capacity Estimation in simple terms with Calculati...Dr.Costas Sachpazis
Terzaghi's soil bearing capacity theory, developed by Karl Terzaghi, is a fundamental principle in geotechnical engineering used to determine the bearing capacity of shallow foundations. This theory provides a method to calculate the ultimate bearing capacity of soil, which is the maximum load per unit area that the soil can support without undergoing shear failure. The Calculation HTML Code included.
Final project report on grocery store management system..pdfKamal Acharya
In today’s fast-changing business environment, it’s extremely important to be able to respond to client needs in the most effective and timely manner. If your customers wish to see your business online and have instant access to your products or services.
Online Grocery Store is an e-commerce website, which retails various grocery products. This project allows viewing various products available enables registered users to purchase desired products instantly using Paytm, UPI payment processor (Instant Pay) and also can place order by using Cash on Delivery (Pay Later) option. This project provides an easy access to Administrators and Managers to view orders placed using Pay Later and Instant Pay options.
In order to develop an e-commerce website, a number of Technologies must be studied and understood. These include multi-tiered architecture, server and client-side scripting techniques, implementation technologies, programming language (such as PHP, HTML, CSS, JavaScript) and MySQL relational databases. This is a project with the objective to develop a basic website where a consumer is provided with a shopping cart website and also to know about the technologies used to develop such a website.
This document will discuss each of the underlying technologies to create and implement an e- commerce website.
CFD Simulation of By-pass Flow in a HRSG module by R&R Consult.pptxR&R Consult
CFD analysis is incredibly effective at solving mysteries and improving the performance of complex systems!
Here's a great example: At a large natural gas-fired power plant, where they use waste heat to generate steam and energy, they were puzzled that their boiler wasn't producing as much steam as expected.
R&R and Tetra Engineering Group Inc. were asked to solve the issue with reduced steam production.
An inspection had shown that a significant amount of hot flue gas was bypassing the boiler tubes, where the heat was supposed to be transferred.
R&R Consult conducted a CFD analysis, which revealed that 6.3% of the flue gas was bypassing the boiler tubes without transferring heat. The analysis also showed that the flue gas was instead being directed along the sides of the boiler and between the modules that were supposed to capture the heat. This was the cause of the reduced performance.
Based on our results, Tetra Engineering installed covering plates to reduce the bypass flow. This improved the boiler's performance and increased electricity production.
It is always satisfying when we can help solve complex challenges like this. Do your systems also need a check-up or optimization? Give us a call!
Work done in cooperation with James Malloy and David Moelling from Tetra Engineering.
More examples of our work https://www.r-r-consult.dk/en/cases-en/
Saudi Arabia stands as a titan in the global energy landscape, renowned for its abundant oil and gas resources. It's the largest exporter of petroleum and holds some of the world's most significant reserves. Let's delve into the top 10 oil and gas projects shaping Saudi Arabia's energy future in 2024.
Explore the innovative world of trenchless pipe repair with our comprehensive guide, "The Benefits and Techniques of Trenchless Pipe Repair." This document delves into the modern methods of repairing underground pipes without the need for extensive excavation, highlighting the numerous advantages and the latest techniques used in the industry.
Learn about the cost savings, reduced environmental impact, and minimal disruption associated with trenchless technology. Discover detailed explanations of popular techniques such as pipe bursting, cured-in-place pipe (CIPP) lining, and directional drilling. Understand how these methods can be applied to various types of infrastructure, from residential plumbing to large-scale municipal systems.
Ideal for homeowners, contractors, engineers, and anyone interested in modern plumbing solutions, this guide provides valuable insights into why trenchless pipe repair is becoming the preferred choice for pipe rehabilitation. Stay informed about the latest advancements and best practices in the field.
Hybrid optimization of pumped hydro system and solar- Engr. Abdul-Azeez.pdffxintegritypublishin
Advancements in technology unveil a myriad of electrical and electronic breakthroughs geared towards efficiently harnessing limited resources to meet human energy demands. The optimization of hybrid solar PV panels and pumped hydro energy supply systems plays a pivotal role in utilizing natural resources effectively. This initiative not only benefits humanity but also fosters environmental sustainability. The study investigated the design optimization of these hybrid systems, focusing on understanding solar radiation patterns, identifying geographical influences on solar radiation, formulating a mathematical model for system optimization, and determining the optimal configuration of PV panels and pumped hydro storage. Through a comparative analysis approach and eight weeks of data collection, the study addressed key research questions related to solar radiation patterns and optimal system design. The findings highlighted regions with heightened solar radiation levels, showcasing substantial potential for power generation and emphasizing the system's efficiency. Optimizing system design significantly boosted power generation, promoted renewable energy utilization, and enhanced energy storage capacity. The study underscored the benefits of optimizing hybrid solar PV panels and pumped hydro energy supply systems for sustainable energy usage. Optimizing the design of solar PV panels and pumped hydro energy supply systems as examined across diverse climatic conditions in a developing country, not only enhances power generation but also improves the integration of renewable energy sources and boosts energy storage capacities, particularly beneficial for less economically prosperous regions. Additionally, the study provides valuable insights for advancing energy research in economically viable areas. Recommendations included conducting site-specific assessments, utilizing advanced modeling tools, implementing regular maintenance protocols, and enhancing communication among system components.
NO1 Uk best vashikaran specialist in delhi vashikaran baba near me online vas...Amil Baba Dawood bangali
Contact with Dawood Bhai Just call on +92322-6382012 and we'll help you. We'll solve all your problems within 12 to 24 hours and with 101% guarantee and with astrology systematic. If you want to take any personal or professional advice then also you can call us on +92322-6382012 , ONLINE LOVE PROBLEM & Other all types of Daily Life Problem's.Then CALL or WHATSAPP us on +92322-6382012 and Get all these problems solutions here by Amil Baba DAWOOD BANGALI
#vashikaranspecialist #astrologer #palmistry #amliyaat #taweez #manpasandshadi #horoscope #spiritual #lovelife #lovespell #marriagespell#aamilbabainpakistan #amilbabainkarachi #powerfullblackmagicspell #kalajadumantarspecialist #realamilbaba #AmilbabainPakistan #astrologerincanada #astrologerindubai #lovespellsmaster #kalajaduspecialist #lovespellsthatwork #aamilbabainlahore#blackmagicformarriage #aamilbaba #kalajadu #kalailam #taweez #wazifaexpert #jadumantar #vashikaranspecialist #astrologer #palmistry #amliyaat #taweez #manpasandshadi #horoscope #spiritual #lovelife #lovespell #marriagespell#aamilbabainpakistan #amilbabainkarachi #powerfullblackmagicspell #kalajadumantarspecialist #realamilbaba #AmilbabainPakistan #astrologerincanada #astrologerindubai #lovespellsmaster #kalajaduspecialist #lovespellsthatwork #aamilbabainlahore #blackmagicforlove #blackmagicformarriage #aamilbaba #kalajadu #kalailam #taweez #wazifaexpert #jadumantar #vashikaranspecialist #astrologer #palmistry #amliyaat #taweez #manpasandshadi #horoscope #spiritual #lovelife #lovespell #marriagespell#aamilbabainpakistan #amilbabainkarachi #powerfullblackmagicspell #kalajadumantarspecialist #realamilbaba #AmilbabainPakistan #astrologerincanada #astrologerindubai #lovespellsmaster #kalajaduspecialist #lovespellsthatwork #aamilbabainlahore #Amilbabainuk #amilbabainspain #amilbabaindubai #Amilbabainnorway #amilbabainkrachi #amilbabainlahore #amilbabaingujranwalan #amilbabainislamabad
NO1 Uk best vashikaran specialist in delhi vashikaran baba near me online vas...
Chap-5-T-Girder Example-1.pdf
1. Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures
AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 1
Chapter 5: T-Girder Bridge Example
SIMPLE SPAN R.C. T- GIRDER BRIDGE
PART- I : SUPERSTRUCTURE DESIGN
Consultant: XXXXX
Project: YYYYY
Name of Bridge: RRRRR
Prepared by: Designer
Checked by: Client
Case: Statical calculation
Date: Date-Month-Year
1. DESIGN DATA AND SPECIFICATIONS
1.1 Subject Information:
Superstructure type:- Simple span R.C.T Girder
Clear span : 18 m
Clear Roadway 7.3 m
concrete ( section
9.3)
Curb 0.85 m
1.2 Material properties:
Concrete :- Grade C - 30 concrete ( section 9.3)
fc'= = 24 MPa (fc' cylinder )
fc=0.4*fc' = 10 MPa (For serviceability)
Ec=.043γC
1.5
sqrt(fc') = 24,768 MPa
2. Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures
AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 2
=
1.3 Reinforcement steel:
Grade 400 steel: For rebars diam. above 16mm
fy = 400 MPa
fs = 200 MPa
Es = 200,000 MPa S 5.4.3.2
Grade 300 steel: For rebars less than diam. 16
fy = 300 MPa
fs = 150 MPa
Es = 200,000 MPa S 5.4.3.2
Modular ratio n = Ec / Es = 8.07 Use n = 8
Live Loading: (1) Design Truck : HL-93 live load
(2) Design Tandem
Ptruck = 72.5 kN
Lane load = 9.3 kN/m
Ptandem = 55 kN
3. Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures
AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 3
P/4 P P
(4.3m - 9.0m)
(4.3m)
P=wheel load =72.5KN
LONGITUDNAL ARRANGEMENT
P P
(1.8m)
TRANSVERSE ARRANGEMENT
P P
(1.8m)
TRANSVERSE ARRANGEMENT
P P
(1.2m)
LONGITUDNAL ARRANGEMENT
P=wheel load =1/2*110KN=55KN
DESIGN TANDEM
Design method: Load and Resistance Factor Design (LRFD) Method
Reference: ERA's Bridge Design Manual 2002
AASHTO Standard Specifications for Highway Bridges, 1998, and latest version
2. BRIDGE CROSS SECTION
4. Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures
AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 4
5. Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures
AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 5
3.1 Given Data
Clear Road way width, W1= 7.30 m
Clear Road way width, W2= 0 m
Sidewalk width, SW= 0.85 m
Total bridge width, WT= 9.00 m
No. of lane= 2
Multiple presence factor for double lane
loading= 1.00
Multiple presence factor for single lane
loading= 1.20
3.2 Preliminary Dimensions
No. of girders= 4.00
width of support= 0.50 m
expansion length left at both sides= 0.05 m
c/c of support= 18.50 m
Clear span plus depth of member = 19.40 m
Design span length, S= 18.50 m
Top slab thickness, T = 0.20 m
Recommended min. girder depth=0.07*S= 1.30 m
Use Girder depth D= 1.40 m
c/c girder spacing, a = 2.20 m
End of slab to center of exterior girder, c = 1.20 m
Minimum Web width recommended, bw = 0.20 M
6. Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures
AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 6
Use web width, bw = 0.40 m
Clear span b/n girders = 1.80 m
Wall slenderness ratio = 3.50 m
Top slab thickness = 0.20 m
Overhang slab thickness near ext.
girder= 0.30 m
Overhang slab length= 1.000 m
fillet= 0.10 m
Exterior diaphragm depth= 1.20 m
Width of diaphragm= 0.25 m
Number of exterior diaphragm= 2.00
Number of interior diaphragm= 2.00
Total number of diaphrams= 4
c/c spacing of diaphragms= 6.22 m
Assumed wearing surface thickness= 0.10 m
Crown slope in the transverse
direction= 2.50 %
depth of post= 0.30 m
width of post= 0.25 m
Average spacing between posts= 1.50 m
Height of post 0.85 m
depth of rail= 0.40 m
7. Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures
AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 7
Width of rail= 0.25 m
Face of rail from end of curb= 0.10 m
Edge of post from exterior edge of
curb= 0.05 m
curb Top width= 0.85 m
curb Bottom width= 1.00 m
curb Top Height = 0.30 m
curb Bottom Height= 0.25 m
unit weight of rein. concrete= 25.00 kN/m3
unit weight of Asphalt= 22.50 kN/m3
ф for moment= 0.90
ф for shear= 0.90
8. Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures
AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 8
4. DESIGN OF OVER HANG SLAB
4.1 Loads
4.1.1DeadLoad&Moments
Dead loads
(kN/m)
Moment arm about face
of exterior girder
(m)
MDL
(kNm/m)
W1= 2.50 0.775 1.938
W2= 1.06 0.825 0.877
W3= 6.38 0.575 3.666
W4= 3.13 0.333 1.042
Sum WDL = 13.06 MDL = 7.521
9. Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures
AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 9
4.1.2 Live Loads
i ) Design Truck Load & Moments
The application of live load for the design of deck overhang is done according to AASHTO 1998, Art. 3.6.1.3
In designing sidewalks, slabs and supporting members, wheel load located on the sidewalk shall be
300mm from the face of the rail 0.3 m
Distribution width for wheel loads (Art. 3.24.5.1.1) (AASHTO 4.6.2.1.3-Table 1)
x = 0.350 m
kN Assuming the worst case
where the vehicle climb on the curb P = 72.5
10. Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures
AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 10
E=0.833x+1140, where x=the distance in mm from load to point of support
E = 1431.55 mm 1.43 m
Live load moment per linear meter width of slab
MLL= (P/E)*x= 17.73 kNm/m
Dynamic Allowance Factor
IM = 33%
Live Load plus impact:
MLL+IM = 23.57 kNm/m
Railing Load
E=0.833x+1140, where x=the distance in mm from load to point of support
E = 1681.45 mm 1.681 m x =0.650
Live load moment per linear meter width of slab Ph=44.51
MRL= (Ph/E)*h= 34.41 kNm/m h=1.3
ii ) Design
Tandem
The design tandem wheel load, P = 55kN, is smaller than the design truck load, P=72.5kN, and hence not considered for
for overhang design
iii)Lane Load
Longutidinal lane load distrbution=9.3kN/M 9.30 kN/M
Transversal lane load distrbution=(9.3/3)kN/M= 3.10 kN/M
11. Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures
AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 11
Mlane load = 1.55 kNm/m
iv ) Pedestrian Live Load
Pedestrian live load = 4.00 kN/m2 (AASHTO 2004 Art.3.6.1
Moment due to pedestrian load = 2.00 kNm/m
Total Design Moment
MTOT = 1.25*MDL + 1.75*MLL+IM = 75.84 kNm/m
4.2 Reinforcement
4.2.1 Reinforcement for Mtot
As= Mu / ( Ø fy (d - a/2 ) )
a = As*fy / ( 0.85 * fc' b ) Mu = 75.84 kN-m/m
Ø = 0.90
b = 1000 mm
fy = 300 N/mm2
fc' = 24 N/mm2
D = 300 mm
diam = 16 mm
cover = 50 mm
d = 242 mm
Goal Seek 0.00
Assume a = 17.72 mm
As = Mu / ( Ø fy (d - a/2 ) ) = 1,205 mm2/m
12. Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures
AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 12
a = As*fy / ( 0.85 * fc' b ) = 17.72 mm
Required As = 1205 mm2/m
Required
spacing = 160 mm
Minimum Reinforcement (Art. 8.17.1)
Fr = 0.63 * SQRT(fc') = 3.09 N/mm2
Icr = bh3
/12 = 2.250E+09 mm4
Mcr = fr * Icr / (yt) = 46.30 kNm/m Yt = d/2
1.2 * Mcr = 55.55 kNm/m
Mdesign = 75.84 kNm/m OK!!
Mu = 55.55 KNm/m
Ø = 0.90
b = 1000 mm
fy = 300 N/mm2
fc' = 24 N/mm2
D = 300 mm
diam = 16 mm
cover = 50 mm
d = 242 mm
13. Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures
AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 13
Assume a = 12.84 mm Goal Seek 0.00
As = Mu / ( Ø fy (d - a/2 ) ) 873 mm2
a = As*fy / ( 0.85 * fc' b ) = 12.84 mm
OK !!
Required As = 873 mm2/m
Required spacing for minimum steel area = 230 mm
S Provided= 160 mm
Use diameter 16
mm bars
c/c 160 mm
As provided
= 1,257 mm2
5. DESIGN OF DECK SLAB
5.1 Interior span slab
5.1.1 Loadings
a) Dead Loads
Dead loads computation
Slab = 5.00 kN/m2
Asphalt 10cm thickness
= 2.25 kN/m2
wDL = 7.25 kN/m2
MDL= (WDL*S2
*0.80)/8 where 0.80 is a continuity factor
14. Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures
AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 14
Span length S = Clear span
= 1.80 m
MDL = 1/8( wDL*S2
*0.80) = 2.35 kNm/m
b) Live Loads
Live Load moment for continuous slab ( Art. 3.24.3.1)
MLL = 1/32(S+2)P20*0.80 where S= span length in feet (Art. 3.24.1.2), S= 1.80 m
MLL = = 3221.39 lb-ft/ft = P= 72.50 kN
MLL = = 14.33 kNm/m
Impact Factor (Art. 3.8.2.1)
IM = 33%
Live load plus impact
MLL+IM = = 19.06 kNm/m
Lane load P=9.3/3 = 3.10 kN/m
Mlane = 1.00 kNm/m
c) Factored Design moment
Total Design moment
MTOTAL = 1.25*MDL + 1.75*(MLL+IM +Mlane) = 38.04 kNm/m
5.1.2Reinforcement
Goal Seek -0.01 Mu =38.04
Assume a = 15.44 mm Ø =0.90
15. Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures
AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 15
As = Mu / ( Ø fy (d - a/2 ) ) 1,049 mm2 b =1000
a = As*fy / ( 0.85 * fc' b ) = 15.43 mm fy =300
OK !! fc' =24
D =200
diam =16
Required As = 1049 mm2/m cover =50
Spacing, s = 192 mm d =242
Use diameter 16 mm bars c/c 190 mm ( top and bottom reinf.-transverse)
As provided = 1,058 mm2; S1,S2
For main reinforcement perpendicular to traffic, the distribution reinf. is given as percentage of the main slab reinf. as given
below:
As(distr.) % = 3840/sqrt(S) <= 67%
Therefore, % As dist. = 91 % ( S is in feet) where; S= 1.8 m
% As (distr.) = 67% 721.7847769
As dist. = 0.67 * As provided = 709 mm2/m
spacing = 217.12 mm diam. of bar= 14
Use diam. 14 mm bars c/c 210 mm (bottom reinf. - Longtiudinal)
As provided = 733 mm2 S3
For components less than 1200mm thick, the area of reinforcement in each direction shall not be less than:
As (temp. & shrinkage) > 0.11*(Ag/fy) = 73.33 mm2/m
16. Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures
AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 16
As (temp and shrink.)= 73.33 mm2/m
Using diam. 12 bar
spacing = 1542 mm diam. of bar =
Use diam. 12 c/c 300 mm (top. reinf. ) S4
6. DESIGN OF LONGITUDINAL GIRDERS
6.1. Loads
6.1.1 DeadLoads
a)ExteriorGirder
17. Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures
AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 17
C= 1.20 m, cant. Span to center of support
a= 2.20 m
bw= 0.40 m
Uniform dead loads per linear meter span (kN/m)
W1= 2.50
W2= 1.06
W3 (EXTERIROR
CURB)= 6.38
W4 3.13
W5=girder 14.00
W6=top slab 4.50
W8=Wearing surface 3.26
W9=Fillet 0.25
sum 35.08
Weight of Diaphragms:
Conc. Load P1 = 5.63 kN
Conc. Load P2 = 11.25 kN
18. Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures
AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 18
L
WDL
P1 ( KN)
P1
WDL= 35.075 kN/m
P1= 5.63 kN
P2= 11.25 kN
L= 18.50 m
Shear Forces and Bending Moments due to Dead Loads on Exterior Girder
VDL(x)= P1/2+W(L/2-X)
MDL(x)= P2X/2+WX/2(L-X)
x
(m)
VDL
(kN)
MDL
(kNm)
0.00 330.07 0.00
20. Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures
AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 20
Uniform dead loads per linear meter span
(kN/m)
Top slab = 11.00 tts=thickness of
girder = bw*(D-tts)*25 = 12.00 top slab
Wearing surface = 4.95
sum WDL = 27.95 kN/m
Diaphragms:
Conc. Load P1 = 11.25 kN
L
WDL
P1 ( KN)
P1
WDL= 27.95 kN/m
P1= 11.25 kN
P2= 11.25 kN
L= 18.50 m
21. Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures
AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 21
Shear Forces and Bending Moments due to Dead Loads on
Interior Girder
VDL(x)= P1/2+W(L/2-X)
MDL(x)= P2X/2+WX/2(L-X)
x
(m)
VDL
(kN)
MDL
(kNm)
0.00 330.07 0.00
0.925 297.62 295.51
1.850 265.18 561.01
2.775 232.74 796.50
3.700 200.29 1001.98
4.625 167.85 1177.45
5.550 135.40 1322.90
6.475 102.96 1438.35
7.400 70.51 1523.78
8.325 38.07 1579.20
9.250 5.63 1604.61
22. Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures
AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 22
6.1.2 Live Loads
P/4 P P
(4.3m - 9.0m)
(4.3m)
P=wheel load =72.5KN
LONGITUDNAL ARRANGEMENT
P P
(1.8m)
TRANSVERSE ARRANGEMENT
P P
(1.8m)
TRANSVERSE ARRANGEMENT
P P
(1.2m)
LONGITUDNAL ARRANGEMENT
P=wheel load =1/2*110KN=55KN
a) Design Truck Load : HL-93
b) Design Tandem
The design lane load shall consist of a load of 9.3kN/m, uniformly distributed in the longitudinal direction.
Transversely, the design lane load shall be assumed to be uniformly distributed over 3m width.
Lane load for exterior girder 4.495 kN/m
Load width=1.45
Ra=Rb= 41.58 kN
Lane load for interior girder 6.82 kN/m Load width=2.2
Ra=Rb= 63.09 kN
23. Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures
AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 23
6.1.2.1 Dynamic Load Allowance
Section 3.13, the vehicular dynamic load allowance IM
IM = 33%
The live loads shall be factored by 1+IM/100 = 1.33
6.1.2.2 Transverse Load Distribution
In designing sidewalks, slabs and supporting members, a wheel load should be located one foot from the face of the barrier
For the design of components other than the deck overhang, the design truck or tandem shall be positioned transversely such tha
load
is not closer than 600mm from the edge of the design lane. (Art 3.6.1.3.1 - AASHTO 2004 )
Distribution Factor for Shear (Sec. 13.4: Table 13-7 & 13-8)
Exterior Girder:
Case-1: One Design lane loaded
The lever rule is applied assuming that the slab is simply supported over the longitudinal beams (Table 13-8)
24. Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures
AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 24
The distribution coefficient to the exterior girder for shear
REX1 (shear)= if (C<(0.8+0.6), P/a*[(a -
d1)+(d2)],P/a*[(1.8-(C-(0.8+0.6))-(C-(0.8+0.6))]) = 0.95 P
25. Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures
AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 25
Case-2: Two or more design lanes loaded
The distribution of live load per lane for shear in exterior girder is determined according to the formulas given in Table 13-8.
REX2 (shear) = (0.6+de/3000)*Rin shear = 0.692 per lane de= 0.900
This factor is for one wheel load, for axle load which is equivalent to two lines of wheels should be multiplied by 2 Ok
REX2 (shear) = (0.64+de/3800)*Rin shear = 1.384 P Ok
Therefore, REX (shear) in exterior girder is maximum of the above two values, REX1 or REX2
REX (shear) = 1.384 P
Interior Girder:
Case-1: One Design lane loaded
The distribution of live load per lane for shear in interior girder is determined according to the formulas given in Table 13-7.
RINT 1 (shear) = (0.36+S/7600) = 0.649 per lane where 1100<=S<=4900
6000<=L<=73000
890<=d<=2800
For two lines of wheels (axle load) Nb>=4 ok
RINT 1 (shear) = 1.299 P S=
de= distance from outside face of exterior girder to interior edge of curb or traffic barrier. It is positive if the exterior
web is inboard of the curb and negative if it is outboard de=C-bw/2-0.4
26. Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures
AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 26
L=SPAN LENGTH
d=over all depth of a girder
S is the girder spacing
Nc is the number of cells
Case-2: Two or more design lanes are loaded
The distribution of live load per lane for shear in interior girder
RINT 1 (shear) = 0.2+S/3600-[S/10700]^2 =
For two lines of wheels (axle load)
RINT 2 (shear) =
Therefore, RINT (shear), in interior girder is maximum of the above two values, RINT 1 or RINT 2
RINT (shear) =
Distribution Factor for moment (Sec.13.4: Table 13-3 and 13-4)
Exterior Girder
Case-1: One Design lane loaded
The distribution of live load per lane for moment in exterior girder (Use Lever
Rule)
(Table 4.6.2.2.2d-1 Distribution of Live
Loads Per Lane for Moment in Exterior
Longitudinal Beams.)
REXT1 (moment)= if (C<(0.8+0.6), P/a*[(a-d1)+(d2
)],P/a*[(1.8-(C-(0.8+0.6))-(C-(0.8+0.6))]) = 1.045 P S=2.2
Case-2: Two or more design lanes loaded de= 0.9
27. Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures
AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 27
REXT2 (moment) = (0.77+de/2800) = 1.091 P
The distribution factor for wheel load (i.e. two lines of wheels) is 2 times the maximum of the above two values
Rext (moment)= 2.183 P
Interior Girder
Case-1: One Design lane loaded
The distribution factor of live load per lane for moment in interior girder:
RINT1(moment) =0.06+(S/4300)^0.4*(S/L)^0.3*(Kg/Lts^3)^0.1
Case-2: Two or more design lanes loaded
RINT2(moment) =0.075+(S/4300)^0.64*(S/L)^0.2*(Kg/Lts^3)^0.1 0.512
The distribution factor for wheel load (i.e. two lines of wheels) is 2 times the maximum of the above two values
RINT (moment) = 1.024 P
6.1.2.3 Shear Forces and Bending Moments due to Live Loads
a) Influence Lines for Shear Forces and Bending Moments
a-1) Design Truck: HL-93
28. Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures
AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 28
Influence Lines for Shear Force at "x" distance from end support
Influence Lines for Bending Moment at "x" distance from end support
29. Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures
AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 29
30. Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures
AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 30
a-2) Design Tandem
Influence Lines for Shear Force at 'x' distance from end support
31. Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures
AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 31
Influence Lines for Bending Moments at 'X' distance from end support
b) Shear forces due to Live load plus impact
b-1) Exterior Girder
Design Truck: VLL + IM = (1.00+IM )*(Dist. Factor)*(Ptruck)* (A+B+C/4) IM = 33%
Design Tandem: VLL + IM = (1.00+IM )*(Dist. Factor)*(Ptandem)*(A+B+C) L = 18.50
Dist. Factor = 1.38
P truck= 72.50
P tandem= 55.00
41. Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures
AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 41
When the live load is Design Tandem
Design Tandem Load
Maximum, MLL+IM
x Coefficients Sum Coef.
(m) A B C D ( A + B + C+D )
0 - - - - - -
0.925 0.88 0.82 0.07 0.01 1.78 132.94
1.85 1.67 1.55 0.04 - 3.26 243.79
2.775 2.36 2.18 - - 4.54 339.84
3.7 2.96 2.72 - - 5.68 425.41
4.625 3.47 3.17 - - 6.64 497.13
5.55 3.89 3.53 - - 7.41 554.99
6.475 4.21 3.79 - - 8.00 598.99
7.4 4.44 3.96 - - 8.40 629.13
8.325 4.58 4.04 - - 8.62 645.42
9.25 4.63 4.03 - - 8.65 647.86
6.1.3 Seismic Force Effects
42. Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures
AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 42
Earthquake zones: EBCS Zone -4
Site Coefficient: Type I = 1.5
Acceleration coefficient(A): =
The horizontal seismic force is the product of the site coefficient, the acceleration coefficient and the permanent load
Computation of permanent loads:
Railing and posts = 131.81 kN
Sidewalks = 869.50 kN
Top Slab = 638.25 kN
Girders= 777.00 kN
Diaphrams= 135.00 kN
Asphalt = 303.86 kN
Sum Wp = 2855.43 kN
Horizontal earhquake force FH = site coeff.*A* Wp = 428.31
This force is transferred to the substructure through the bearings located at ends of the bridge
Earthquake force transferred to one support = 1/2*FH = 214.16
This force is applied horizontally to the bearings
Total Dead Load reaction at one support = 1427.71
Assume coef. of friction between bearing and concrete seat at abut, µ= 0.50
The frictional resistance force developed between the interface = µ*Dead load Rxn
= 713.86
So Earthquake effects are negligible!!
43. Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures
AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 43
6.1.4 FACTORED LOADS
Load Factors and Load Combinations
The load factors and load combinations are according to ERA's Bridge Design Manual 2002, section 3.3
The load combination to be used for design is Strenght - I Limit state, Table 3-1.
Factored Load = gb *DL + 1.75* ( LL + IM ) = 1.25*DL+1.75*(LL+IM) gb =1.25
Factored Shear Forces
46. Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures
AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 46
b) Effective Compression Flange Width, beff, ( AASHTO Art. 4.6.2.6.1)
Exterior Girder
For exterior beams, the effective flange width may be taken as one-half the effective width of the
adjacent interior beam, plus the least of:
a. 1/8 effective span length = 2.31m L = 18.5 m
b.
6 times the average thickness of the slab, plus the
greater of half the web thickness or one-quarter of
the width of the top flange of the basic girder = 1.75m hf=200 mm
c. The width of the overhang = 1.00m Bw=400 mm
beff < 1/2*Effective width of interior girder + minimum value of
= 2.10m
Overhand =1.0 m
Clear girder spac. =
1.8 m
47. Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures
AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 47
Interior Girder
The effective compression flange width, beff, is the minimum of the following:
a. 1/4 span = 4.63 m
b.
12 times the average thickness of the slab, plus the greater of web thickness or one-half
of the width of the top flange of the girder = 2.80
c. The average spacing of the adjacent beam = 2.20
Effective compression flange width, beff = 2.20
Use compression flange width, beff = 2.10
c) Spacing Limits for Reinforcements ( AASHTO 2004 - Art. 5.10.3.1.1)
Horizontal
In cast-in-place concrete, the clear distance between parallel bars in a layer shall not be less than:
1.5 times bar diameter = 48 mm Assume d=32
1.5 times the
max. size of
coarse
aggregate
(i.e.25.4mm)
= = 38 mm
38mm
= 38 mm
Hence the minimum clear distance between parallel bars in
a layer with no lapping is = 48 mm =
48. Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures
AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 48
Assuming vertical lapping of bars, one over the other, The minimum clear distance between parallel bars in a layer
is = 48 mm
Therefore, the minimum center to center spacing of bars in a layer is = 80 mm
Use center to center spacing of bars in a layer = 80 mm
Therefore, the minimum center to center spacing of bars in a layer with overlap is = 112 mm
Use center to center spacing of bars in a layer = 120 mm
Vertical
Minimum clear distance between two layers of bars is 1 inch or dia of bar = 32 mm
Thus, minimum center to center spacing of bars when there is lap = 96 mm
Use vertical center to center spacing of bars b/n layers = 100 mm
d) Section Capacity and Reinforcement
The maximum design moment is:
Mmax = 5,052.59 kNm Cover(mm)= 40
Try No of bars ф of bars ai di(m) ai*di
G0 1st row = 4 32 3217 0.072 232
G1 2nd row = 4 32 3217 0.080 257
G2 3rd row = 4 32 3217 0.088 283
G3 4th row = 4 32 3217 0.096 309
16 12868 1081
D = 1.400 m
49. Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures
AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 49
d' = sum ai*di = 0.084 m
sum ai
d = D - d' = 1.316 m
b = 2.100 m
Assume rectangular beam analysis
As= 12,868 mm2
b = 2.100 m
d = 1.316 m
fy = 400.0 MPa
fc' = 24.00 Mpa
bw = 0.400 m
hf = 0.20 m
Ø = 0.90 m
r= As/bd = 0.00466
a = As*fy/(0.85*fc'*b) 120.15 mm
It is rectangular beam as assumed
ØMn =Ø*As*fy*(d-a/2) 5,818.03 kNm
The following computations for T-beam analysis do not apply
Asf = 0.85*fc'*(b-bw)*hf/fy = - mm2
M1=Asf*fy*(d-hf/2) = - kNm
50. Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures
AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 50
a = (As - Asf)*fy/(0.85*fc'*bw) = - mm
M2 =(As - Asf)*fy*(d-a/2) = - kNm
Mu = M1 + M2 = - kNm
ØMu = Ø ( M1 + M2 ) = - kNm
Therefore, the
section capacity is
ØMn = 5818.03 kN-m >> Mmax = 5,05,59 kN - m
e) Checking maximum steel area
rf = Asf/b'wd = 0.00211 b' bot-flange reinf.dist- width = 2.10 m
rmax = 0.75*rb = 0.75*0.85*b1*(fc'/fy)*(600/(600+fy)+rf) b1=0.85
= 0.0195 fc' = 24 MPa
rprovided = (As-Asf)/bwd = 0.0047 << rmax fy =400 MPa
OK !!
f) Check for minimum reinforcement (ERA BDM Section 9.4.5)
i. The minimum reinforcement criteria: - AASHTO 2004, Art. 5.7.3.3.2
ØMn > = minimum of 1.2Mcr. or 1.33 Mu
51. Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures
AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 51
ØMn > = 1.2Mcr.
btop= 2.10 m
hf= 0.20 m
bw= 0.40 m
D= 1.40 m
hbot= 0.15 m
bbot= 2.10 m
length accommodating the reinforcement is
taken
Mcr = fr * Ig / yt
fr = 0.63 * SQRT( fc' ) = 3.086 N/mm2
Centroid of cross section
y1=Sum(Ai*yi)/(sumAi) =
Sum Ai*yi = 0.853 m3
Sum Ai = 1.155 m2
Yt=Sum(Ai*yi)/(sumAi) = 0.739 m
Gross moment of inertia, Ig, about centroid
I1=1/12*btop*hf
3
+ A1*d1
2
= 0.1338 m4
I2=1/12*bw*(D - hf -hbot)3
+ A2*d2
2
= 0.0403 m4
I3=1/12*bbot*(hbot )3
+ A3*d3
2
= 0.1393 m4
Sum Ig = 0.3134 m4
52. Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures
AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 52
The crackimg moment, Mcr,
Mcr = fr * Ig / yt = 1,309.37 KNm
1.2Mcr = 1,571.25 KNm
Mmax = 5,052.59 KNm >>
OK!
ii. The minimum reinforcement criteria: - AASHTO 2004, Art. 5.7.3.3.2
rmin = 0.03*fc'/fy = 0.0018
r = As/bd = 0.0244 b= bw = 0.40
OK!
g) Serviceability Requirements
Fatigue stress limits ( ERA BDM Section 9.6.2 ) or (AASHTO LRFD Art. 5.5.3.2)
Fatigue stress limits will be checked for the service load conditions. The permissible stress range is given by Eq. 9.19.
ff = 145 - 0.33 fmin + 55 (r/h)
k = [rn+0.5(ts/d)2
] / (rn+(ts/d) = 0.258
k*d = 0.339 m
T-beam
If it is rectangular beam
53. Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures
AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 53
j = 1 - k/3 = -
If it is T-beam
j = 6 - 6(hf/d)+2(hf/d)2
- (hf/d)3
/(2pn) = 0.935
6 - 3 (hf/d)
The minimum stress, fmin , is : (the minimum stress is created when there is no vehicle moving on the brid
fmin = MDL/(As*j*d) = 101.39 N/mm2
The maximim stress, fmax, is caused by the total load ( MDL+LL+IM ) (the maximum stress is created when the
vehicle is moving on the bridge, i.e., due to the self weight + moving load)
fmax = (MDL+LL+IM) /(As*j*d) = 200.51 N/mm2
The actual stress range, delta ff, is:
Delta ff = fmax - fmin = 99.12 N/mm2
The fatigue stress limit, ff, is
ff = 145 - 0.33* fmin + 55 (r/h) = 128.04 N/mm2 >>
OK !!
Control of Cracking by Distribution of Reinforcement (Sec. 9.4.5)
To control flexural cracking of the concrete, tension reinforcement shall be well distributed within maximum flexural zones.
Components shall be so proportioned that the tensile stress in the steel reinforcement at service limit state, fs, does not exceed
fsa = Z / (dc*A)1/3
< = 0.6*fy
54. Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures
AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 54
A = Effective tension area/ No. of bars=bw*(2y')/N= 0.00420, y’ = d’ = 0.084 m
dc = distance measured from extreme tension fiber to
center of the closest bar = 0.072; bw = 0.40
Z = crack width parameter, assumed = 30.00 ; No of bars = 16
Therefore, for crack control the maximum allowable stress is
fsa = Z / (dc*A)1/3 <=0.6fy = 240.00 fsa = 240 MPa
The maximim stress, fmax, at service load is
fmax = (MDL+MLL+IM) /(As*j*d) = 200.51
OK
h) Bar Cutting
Development of Reinforcement (ERA BDM Sec. 9.4.3)or AASHTO, Art. 5.11.1.2.2
Positive moment reinforcement: Atleast one-third of the positive moment reinforcement in simple span
members shall extend along the same face of the member beyond the centerline of the support.
The basic development length, ldb, in mm is
For bars diam. 35 and smaller, ldb = 0.02Ab*fy/sqrt(fc') >=0.06db*fy db=
ldb = 0.02Ab*fy/sqrt(fc') = 1313 mm fy= 400
fc'= 24.0
The tension development length,ld, is 0.06db*fy= 768.0
ld = ldb * modification factor = 1313 mm mod. Factor = 1.00
55. Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures
AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 55
Modification factor 2 taken to account for clear spacing between bars
Lap splices of Reinforcement in Tension
The length of lap for tension lap splices shall not be less than either 300mm or the 1.3 times the development
length
Lap splices for diam. 32 bar = 1,707 mm
Flexural Reinforcement Extension Length (Sec. 9.4.5)
Except at supports of simple spans and at the free ends of cantilevers, reinforcement shall be extended beyond the point at
which it is no longer required to resist flexure for a distance not less than:
a) the effective depth of the member = 1.32 m
b) 15 times the nominal diameter of bar = 0.48 m
c) 1/20 of the clear span = 0.90 m
Therefore, extension length is max. of the above
values and development length ld = 1.32 m
x
(m)
Mx
(KNm) 4Æ32 8Æ32 12Æ32 16Æ32 0Æ32
0.00 0.000 1520.59 2997.12 4415.70 5780.97 0.00
0.93 1042.82 1520.59 2997.12 4415.70 5780.97 0.00
57. Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures
AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 57
D = 1.40 m
beff= 2.10 m
bw= 0.40 m
bw'= 2.10 m
hf= 0.20 m
f= 0.90
fy= 400 Mpa
f'c= 24 Mpa
n(no.of bottom bar) 4
58. Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures
AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 58
dc= 72 mm
Rectangular Analysis T Beam Analysis
fM= fAs*fy(d-a/2) Asf=.85*f'c*(beff-bw)*hf/fy
a=(As-Asf)fy/(.85*f'c*bw)
M1=Asf*fy(d-hf/2)
M2=(As-Asf)fy*(d-a/2)
fM= f(M1+M2)
No. of bars
Total No.
of bars Diam.(mm) As(mm2)
y
bar(mm)
d=D-
ybar(mm) r = As/bd
a=As*fy/
(.85*f'cbef
f) R or T fMr
4 4 32 3217 72 1328.00 0.001 30.037 R 1520.59
4 8 32 6434 80 1324.00 0.002 60.075 R 2997.12
4 12 32 9651 88 1316.00 0.003 90.112 R 4415.70
4 16 32 12868 96 1308.00 0.005 120.149 R 5780.97
x
(m)
Mx
(KNm)
59. Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures
AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 59
0.00 0.000
0.925 1042.823
1.850 1964.740
2.775 2765.751
3.700 3445.856
4.625 4005.055
5.550 4443.348
6.475 4760.736
7.400 4957.218
8.325 5052.592
9.25 4759.392
covered dis
Type No. of bars R or T Resisting Moment
x for
moment From to length of bar
G0 4 R 1,520.59 1.502 0 1.502 18.9
G1 4 R 2,997.12 3.28 1.502 3.28 15.50
G2 4 R 4,415.70 5.754 3.28 5.754 11.94
G3 4 R 5,780.97 10.25 3.28 10.25 11.94
60. Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures
AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 60
a = 1/2*circumf.+4*db = 630mm
e = 4*db = 4*32mm = 128mm
d
a
d = 10*db =320mm
Standard Hook Detail
e
Standard hook length = 0.63 M
4db = 128 mm
5db = 160 mm
61. Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures
AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 61
length=
Length of Flexural Reinforcement bars
resistance length total length
The bar
start at
x= d
Bar- G0 = 14* Diam. 32
bars 1520.59 9.24 19.74 m 0.050 1.328
Bar- G1 =4*diam.32 bars 2997.12 7.75 18.13 m 0.136 1.324
Bar- G2 =4*diam.32 bars 4415.70 5.97 14.57 m 1.914 1.324
Bar- G3 = 4*diam.32 bars 5780.97 5.97 14.57 m 1.914 1.324
Bar- G4 =4*diam.32 bars 0.00 0.00 2.63 m 7.884 1.324
i ) Skin Reinforcement
If the effective depth, de, of reinforced concrete member exceeds 900mm, longitudinal skin reinforcement shall be uniformly distributed
along both side faces of the member for a distance d/2 nearest the flexural tension reinforcement.
The area of skin reinforcement, Ask, in mm2/m of height on each side face shall not be less than
Ask > = 0.001*(de - 760) <= As/1200
Effective depth de = D - d' = 1050 mm > 900mm
Therefore, Skin Reinf. shall be provided!
Ask > = 0.001*(de - 760) = 290 mm2/m d = 1.322
Spacing = as/As * 1000 = 690 mm diam. = 16
Maximum spacing, Smax, lesser of d/6 or 300mm = 220 mm
Use diam. 16 mm bars c/c 200 mm G4
62. Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures
AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 62
6.3 DESIGN FOR SHEAR
Shear strength
Design of cross sections subject to shear shall be based on
Vu < = ØVn = Ø (Vc + Vs ) Ø = 0.900
where Vu = factored shear forces at the section
Vn = the nominal shear strength, determined as the lesser of Vn = Vc + Vs or Vn=0.25*fc'*bv*dv
Vc = the nominal shear strength provided by the concrete, determined by:
Vc = 0.083*b*SQRT(fc')*bv*dv, where b= 2.00
Vs = the nominal shear strength provided by the shear reinforcement
Vs = Av*fv*d / s
Shear strength provided by concrete
Shear stress provided by concrete
vc = 0.083*b*sqrt(fc') = 0.813 (MPa )
The shear strength carried by concrete,Vc=vc*bw*d= 0.813 *bw*d (N)
Shear strength provided by shear reinforcement
Where the factored shear force, Vu, exceeds shear strength ØVc, shear reinforcement shall be provided to satisfy
the equation, Vu < = ØVn = Ø ( Vc + Vs )
When shear reinforcement perpendicular to the axis of the member is used
Vs = Vu/Ø - Vc = Av*fy*d / s
There fore, spacing of shear reinforcement, s, is :
S = Av*fy*d / Vs = Av*fy*d/(Vu/Ø-Vc)=Av*fy*d/(Vu/Ø - 0.813*bw*d )
Minimum shear reinforcement ( Eq.12.34 )
Av = 0.083*sqrt(fc')*bw*S / fy fc' = 24MPa
63. Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures
AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 63
Smax = Av*fy / ( 0.083*sqrt(fc')*bw ) fy = 300MPa
Maximum spacing of shear reinforcement Av =diam.12= 226mm2
If Vu < 0.10*fc' * bw * d, S <= 0.8d <= 600mm 0.10*fc' * bw= 960N
If Vu >= 0.10*fc' * bw * d, S <= 0.4d <= 300mm
Sections located less than a distance 'd' from support may be designed for the same shear as that computed at a distance d
x
(m)
Vx
(KN)
0.00 1016.33
0.93 935.55
1.85 854.76
2.78 773.98
3.70 693.19
4.63 612.40
5.55 531.62
6.48 450.83
7.40 370.05
8.33 289.26
9.25 208.47
65. Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures
AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 65
6.4.1 Computation of Gross Moment of Inertia
A) Centroid of cross section
For simplicity of calculations, the slab surface is assumed level, i.e., without crossfall.
The center of gravity is calculated from bottom of girder
Part
Area, Ai
(m2)
Centroid, yi
(m)
Ai*yi
(m3) Centroid of area
Top Slab 1.80 1.30 2.340 y1=sum Ai*yi/(sum Ai)= 1.00
Bottom slab
Girder 1.68 0.68 1.134
Sum 3.48 3.47
B) Gross moment of
Inertia
Part
Area, Ai
(m2)
yi
(m)
ycg = yi-y1
(m)
Ig
(m4)
Ai*(ycg)2
(m3)
Ig+Ai*(ycg)2
(m4)
Top Slab 1.80 1.30 0.30 0.006000 0.164 0.1699
Bottom slab
Girder 1.68 0.68 0.32 0.154350 0.176 0.3299
Sum Ig = 0.4998 m4
C) Computation of Effective Moment of Inertia
66. Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures
AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 66
Ie = [ Mcr/Ma ]3
*Ig + [ 1 - (Mcr/Ma)3
] Icr < = Ig Mcr = cracking moment (N-mm)
fr = 0.63*sqrt(fc') = 3.09 N/mm2 fr = modulus of rupture of concrete as specified in
Mcr = fr*Ig / yt = 1545.19 kNm Article 5.4.2.6 (MPa)
yt = distance from the neutral axis to the extreme
D) Weight of superstructure tension fiber (mm)
Part
W
(KN)
W
(KN/m) Ma = maximum moment in a component at the stage
Top Slab 855.00 45.00 for which deformation is computed (N-mm)
Bottom Slab
Girder 798.00 42.00
Cross Girder 19.13 1.01
Sum W (KN/m) 88.01
Ma(Total Slab) = W*L2
/8 = 3,971
Ma = W*L2
/8
=
MDl ext.
=
W*L2
/8
= 6418.459
Ma = 6418.459 KNM
E) Transformed section
67. Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures
AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 67
fc
T
jd
c
C
fs
kd
d
nAs
kd
d
beff
bw
k*d = 0.339 m (previous calculation)
beff= 8.40 m
bw= 1.60 m
n= 8
As= 51,472 mm2
d= 1.316 m
d'= 0.084 m
D= 1.400 m
hf= 0.200 m
68. Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures
AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 68
j= 0.935 m
Centroid of cross section ( y1 measured from bottom)
Part
Area, Ai
(m2)
yi
(m)
Ai*yi
(m3)
Top Slab 1.80 1.30 2.34 y1=sum Ai*yi/(sum Ai)= 0.77
0.0000
Girder 6.72 0.68 4.536
Transformed steel,
nAs 0.41 0.08 0.035
Sum 8.93 6.91
Computation of Moment of Inertia of Cracked section, Icr
Part
Area, Ai
(m2)
ycg = yi-y1
(m)
Icg
(m4)
Ai*(ycg)2
(m3)
Ig+Ai*(ycg)2
(m4)
Slab 1.80 0.5263 0.004867 0.4986 0.5034
Girder 6.72 0.0987 0.154350 0.0655 0.2198
Transformed
steel, nAs 0.41 0.6897 - 0.1959 0.1959
Sum = 0.9191 m4
Effective moment of Inertia, Ie
69. Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures
AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 69
Ie = [ Mcr / Ma]3
* Ig + [ 1 - (Mcr/Ma)3
] Icr = 0.9133 m4 <= Ig = 0.50
Ie= 0.500
Computation of Dead Load Deflection using effective moment of Inertia, Ie.
i. Instantaneous deflection
The maximum deflection is calculated by using the formula;
Deflection, max. = 5*W*L4
/(384*E*Ie) = 18.5mm E = Ec=24,768 MPa
ii. Long term deflection W =150.03 kN/m
Long term deflection = Instantaneous deflection * factor L=18.5 m
The factor is :
If the instantaneous deflection is based on Ig : = 3
If the instantaneous deflection is based on Ie :3.00-1.2(As'/As)>=1.6 2
Therefore, the Long term deflection = 55 mm
Provide camber 60 mm at mid span of the bridge
Calculation of live load deflection using the effective moment of inertia
The live load deflection at mid -span for different loading conditions that is analogous to the moving
load pattern is given as follows:
70. Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures
AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 70
P
P P P/4
- When investigating the maximum absolute deflection, all design lanes should be loaded; and all
supporting components should be assumed to deflect equally.
- The live load portion of load combination Service I of Table 3-3( i.e, load factors for both live
and dead load equal to 1.0) with dynamic load allowance factor should be applied.
P with IM = 385.7 kN
**two
lane
loads
take
n
w lane load = 18.6 N/mm
def. Lane =5wL4
/(384EIe) = 0.57 mm
According to Chapter 3,
- The live load deflection should be taken as the larger of :
71. Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures
AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 71
* That resulting from the design truck alone, or
* That resulting from 25 percent of the design truck together with the design lane
load.
a x x1 x2 x3
delta 1
(mm)
delta 2
(mm)
delta 3
(mm)
total truck
load
deflection
Maximum
deflection (max
(truck,0.25*truc
k+lane)
0 0.000 9.900 14.20 18.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.57
0.05 0.925 8.975 13.28 17.58 0.61 0.57 0.15 1.33 1.33
0.1 1.850 8.050 12.35 16.65 1.15 1.19 0.53 2.87 2.87
0.15 2.775 7.125 11.43 15.73 1.58 1.82 1.07 4.46 4.46
0.2 3.700 6.200 10.50 14.80 1.87 2.38 1.68 5.93 5.93
0.25 4.625 5.275 9.58 13.88 2.01 2.85 2.31 7.17 7.17
0.3 5.550 4.350 8.65 12.95 1.98 3.19 2.90 8.07 8.07
0.35 6.475 3.425 7.73 12.03 1.80 3.38 3.40 8.58 8.58
0.4 7.400 2.500 6.80 11.10 1.46 3.41 3.79 8.66 8.66
0.45 8.325 1.575 5.88 10.18 1.00 3.27 4.03 8.30 8.30
0.5 9.250 0.650 4.95 9.25 0.43 2.98 4.11 7.53 7.53
Therefore, the maximum live load deflection is the
maximum of the tabulated values above.
Def. Live load Max = 8.66 mm
Allowable Live Load Deflection - AASHTO Art. 2.5.2.6.2
Allowable deflection = Span /800 = 23.13 mm
OK
!
72. Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures
AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 72