SlideShare a Scribd company logo
Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures
AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 1
Chapter 5: T-Girder Bridge Example
SIMPLE SPAN R.C. T- GIRDER BRIDGE
PART- I : SUPERSTRUCTURE DESIGN
Consultant: XXXXX
Project: YYYYY
Name of Bridge: RRRRR
Prepared by: Designer
Checked by: Client
Case: Statical calculation
Date: Date-Month-Year
1. DESIGN DATA AND SPECIFICATIONS
1.1 Subject Information:
Superstructure type:- Simple span R.C.T Girder
Clear span : 18 m
Clear Roadway 7.3 m
concrete ( section
9.3)
Curb 0.85 m
1.2 Material properties:
Concrete :- Grade C - 30 concrete ( section 9.3)
fc'= = 24 MPa (fc' cylinder )
fc=0.4*fc' = 10 MPa (For serviceability)
Ec=.043γC
1.5
sqrt(fc') = 24,768 MPa
Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures
AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 2
=
1.3 Reinforcement steel:
Grade 400 steel: For rebars diam. above 16mm
fy = 400 MPa
fs = 200 MPa
Es = 200,000 MPa S 5.4.3.2
Grade 300 steel: For rebars less than diam. 16
fy = 300 MPa
fs = 150 MPa
Es = 200,000 MPa S 5.4.3.2
Modular ratio n = Ec / Es = 8.07 Use n = 8
Live Loading: (1) Design Truck : HL-93 live load
(2) Design Tandem
Ptruck = 72.5 kN
Lane load = 9.3 kN/m
Ptandem = 55 kN
Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures
AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 3
P/4 P P
(4.3m - 9.0m)
(4.3m)
P=wheel load =72.5KN
LONGITUDNAL ARRANGEMENT
P P
(1.8m)
TRANSVERSE ARRANGEMENT
P P
(1.8m)
TRANSVERSE ARRANGEMENT
P P
(1.2m)
LONGITUDNAL ARRANGEMENT
P=wheel load =1/2*110KN=55KN
DESIGN TANDEM
Design method: Load and Resistance Factor Design (LRFD) Method
Reference: ERA's Bridge Design Manual 2002
AASHTO Standard Specifications for Highway Bridges, 1998, and latest version
2. BRIDGE CROSS SECTION
Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures
AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 4
Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures
AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 5
3.1 Given Data
Clear Road way width, W1= 7.30 m
Clear Road way width, W2= 0 m
Sidewalk width, SW= 0.85 m
Total bridge width, WT= 9.00 m
No. of lane= 2
Multiple presence factor for double lane
loading= 1.00
Multiple presence factor for single lane
loading= 1.20
3.2 Preliminary Dimensions
No. of girders= 4.00
width of support= 0.50 m
expansion length left at both sides= 0.05 m
c/c of support= 18.50 m
Clear span plus depth of member = 19.40 m
Design span length, S= 18.50 m
Top slab thickness, T = 0.20 m
Recommended min. girder depth=0.07*S= 1.30 m
Use Girder depth D= 1.40 m
c/c girder spacing, a = 2.20 m
End of slab to center of exterior girder, c = 1.20 m
Minimum Web width recommended, bw = 0.20 M
Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures
AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 6
Use web width, bw = 0.40 m
Clear span b/n girders = 1.80 m
Wall slenderness ratio = 3.50 m
Top slab thickness = 0.20 m
Overhang slab thickness near ext.
girder= 0.30 m
Overhang slab length= 1.000 m
fillet= 0.10 m
Exterior diaphragm depth= 1.20 m
Width of diaphragm= 0.25 m
Number of exterior diaphragm= 2.00
Number of interior diaphragm= 2.00
Total number of diaphrams= 4
c/c spacing of diaphragms= 6.22 m
Assumed wearing surface thickness= 0.10 m
Crown slope in the transverse
direction= 2.50 %
depth of post= 0.30 m
width of post= 0.25 m
Average spacing between posts= 1.50 m
Height of post 0.85 m
depth of rail= 0.40 m
Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures
AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 7
Width of rail= 0.25 m
Face of rail from end of curb= 0.10 m
Edge of post from exterior edge of
curb= 0.05 m
curb Top width= 0.85 m
curb Bottom width= 1.00 m
curb Top Height = 0.30 m
curb Bottom Height= 0.25 m
unit weight of rein. concrete= 25.00 kN/m3
unit weight of Asphalt= 22.50 kN/m3
ф for moment= 0.90
ф for shear= 0.90
Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures
AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 8
4. DESIGN OF OVER HANG SLAB
4.1 Loads
4.1.1DeadLoad&Moments
Dead loads
(kN/m)
Moment arm about face
of exterior girder
(m)
MDL
(kNm/m)
W1= 2.50 0.775 1.938
W2= 1.06 0.825 0.877
W3= 6.38 0.575 3.666
W4= 3.13 0.333 1.042
Sum WDL = 13.06 MDL = 7.521
Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures
AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 9
4.1.2 Live Loads
i ) Design Truck Load & Moments
The application of live load for the design of deck overhang is done according to AASHTO 1998, Art. 3.6.1.3
In designing sidewalks, slabs and supporting members, wheel load located on the sidewalk shall be
300mm from the face of the rail 0.3 m
Distribution width for wheel loads (Art. 3.24.5.1.1) (AASHTO 4.6.2.1.3-Table 1)
x = 0.350 m
kN Assuming the worst case
where the vehicle climb on the curb P = 72.5
Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures
AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 10
E=0.833x+1140, where x=the distance in mm from load to point of support
E = 1431.55 mm 1.43 m
Live load moment per linear meter width of slab
MLL= (P/E)*x= 17.73 kNm/m
Dynamic Allowance Factor
IM = 33%
Live Load plus impact:
MLL+IM = 23.57 kNm/m
Railing Load
E=0.833x+1140, where x=the distance in mm from load to point of support
E = 1681.45 mm 1.681 m x =0.650
Live load moment per linear meter width of slab Ph=44.51
MRL= (Ph/E)*h= 34.41 kNm/m h=1.3
ii ) Design
Tandem
The design tandem wheel load, P = 55kN, is smaller than the design truck load, P=72.5kN, and hence not considered for
for overhang design
iii)Lane Load
Longutidinal lane load distrbution=9.3kN/M 9.30 kN/M
Transversal lane load distrbution=(9.3/3)kN/M= 3.10 kN/M
Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures
AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 11
Mlane load = 1.55 kNm/m
iv ) Pedestrian Live Load
Pedestrian live load = 4.00 kN/m2 (AASHTO 2004 Art.3.6.1
Moment due to pedestrian load = 2.00 kNm/m
Total Design Moment
MTOT = 1.25*MDL + 1.75*MLL+IM = 75.84 kNm/m
4.2 Reinforcement
4.2.1 Reinforcement for Mtot
As= Mu / ( Ø fy (d - a/2 ) )
a = As*fy / ( 0.85 * fc' b ) Mu = 75.84 kN-m/m
Ø = 0.90
b = 1000 mm
fy = 300 N/mm2
fc' = 24 N/mm2
D = 300 mm
diam = 16 mm
cover = 50 mm
d = 242 mm
Goal Seek 0.00
Assume a = 17.72 mm
As = Mu / ( Ø fy (d - a/2 ) ) = 1,205 mm2/m
Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures
AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 12
a = As*fy / ( 0.85 * fc' b ) = 17.72 mm
Required As = 1205 mm2/m
Required
spacing = 160 mm
Minimum Reinforcement (Art. 8.17.1)
Fr = 0.63 * SQRT(fc') = 3.09 N/mm2
Icr = bh3
/12 = 2.250E+09 mm4
Mcr = fr * Icr / (yt) = 46.30 kNm/m Yt = d/2
1.2 * Mcr = 55.55 kNm/m
Mdesign = 75.84 kNm/m OK!!
Mu = 55.55 KNm/m
Ø = 0.90
b = 1000 mm
fy = 300 N/mm2
fc' = 24 N/mm2
D = 300 mm
diam = 16 mm
cover = 50 mm
d = 242 mm
Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures
AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 13
Assume a = 12.84 mm Goal Seek 0.00
As = Mu / ( Ø fy (d - a/2 ) ) 873 mm2
a = As*fy / ( 0.85 * fc' b ) = 12.84 mm
OK !!
Required As = 873 mm2/m
Required spacing for minimum steel area = 230 mm
S Provided= 160 mm
Use diameter 16
mm bars
c/c 160 mm
As provided
= 1,257 mm2
5. DESIGN OF DECK SLAB
5.1 Interior span slab
5.1.1 Loadings
a) Dead Loads
Dead loads computation
Slab = 5.00 kN/m2
Asphalt 10cm thickness
= 2.25 kN/m2
wDL = 7.25 kN/m2
MDL= (WDL*S2
*0.80)/8 where 0.80 is a continuity factor
Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures
AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 14
Span length S = Clear span
= 1.80 m
MDL = 1/8( wDL*S2
*0.80) = 2.35 kNm/m
b) Live Loads
Live Load moment for continuous slab ( Art. 3.24.3.1)
MLL = 1/32(S+2)P20*0.80 where S= span length in feet (Art. 3.24.1.2), S= 1.80 m
MLL = = 3221.39 lb-ft/ft = P= 72.50 kN
MLL = = 14.33 kNm/m
Impact Factor (Art. 3.8.2.1)
IM = 33%
Live load plus impact
MLL+IM = = 19.06 kNm/m
Lane load P=9.3/3 = 3.10 kN/m
Mlane = 1.00 kNm/m
c) Factored Design moment
Total Design moment
MTOTAL = 1.25*MDL + 1.75*(MLL+IM +Mlane) = 38.04 kNm/m
5.1.2Reinforcement
Goal Seek -0.01 Mu =38.04
Assume a = 15.44 mm Ø =0.90
Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures
AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 15
As = Mu / ( Ø fy (d - a/2 ) ) 1,049 mm2 b =1000
a = As*fy / ( 0.85 * fc' b ) = 15.43 mm fy =300
OK !! fc' =24
D =200
diam =16
Required As = 1049 mm2/m cover =50
Spacing, s = 192 mm d =242
Use diameter 16 mm bars c/c 190 mm ( top and bottom reinf.-transverse)
As provided = 1,058 mm2; S1,S2
For main reinforcement perpendicular to traffic, the distribution reinf. is given as percentage of the main slab reinf. as given
below:
As(distr.) % = 3840/sqrt(S) <= 67%
Therefore, % As dist. = 91 % ( S is in feet) where; S= 1.8 m
% As (distr.) = 67% 721.7847769
As dist. = 0.67 * As provided = 709 mm2/m
spacing = 217.12 mm diam. of bar= 14
Use diam. 14 mm bars c/c 210 mm (bottom reinf. - Longtiudinal)
As provided = 733 mm2 S3
For components less than 1200mm thick, the area of reinforcement in each direction shall not be less than:
As (temp. & shrinkage) > 0.11*(Ag/fy) = 73.33 mm2/m
Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures
AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 16
As (temp and shrink.)= 73.33 mm2/m
Using diam. 12 bar
spacing = 1542 mm diam. of bar =
Use diam. 12 c/c 300 mm (top. reinf. ) S4
6. DESIGN OF LONGITUDINAL GIRDERS
6.1. Loads
6.1.1 DeadLoads
a)ExteriorGirder
Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures
AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 17
C= 1.20 m, cant. Span to center of support
a= 2.20 m
bw= 0.40 m
Uniform dead loads per linear meter span (kN/m)
W1= 2.50
W2= 1.06
W3 (EXTERIROR
CURB)= 6.38
W4 3.13
W5=girder 14.00
W6=top slab 4.50
W8=Wearing surface 3.26
W9=Fillet 0.25
sum 35.08
Weight of Diaphragms:
Conc. Load P1 = 5.63 kN
Conc. Load P2 = 11.25 kN
Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures
AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 18
L
WDL
P1 ( KN)
P1
WDL= 35.075 kN/m
P1= 5.63 kN
P2= 11.25 kN
L= 18.50 m
Shear Forces and Bending Moments due to Dead Loads on Exterior Girder
VDL(x)= P1/2+W(L/2-X)
MDL(x)= P2X/2+WX/2(L-X)
x
(m)
VDL
(kN)
MDL
(kNm)
0.00 330.07 0.00
Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures
AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 19
0.925 297.62 295.51
1.850 265.18 561.01
2.775 232.74 796.50
3.700 200.29 1001.98
4.625 167.85 1177.45
5.550 135.40 1322.90
6.475 102.96 1438.35
7.400 70.51 1523.78
8.325 38.07 1579.20
9.250 5.63 1604.61
b) Interior Girder
Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures
AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 20
Uniform dead loads per linear meter span
(kN/m)
Top slab = 11.00 tts=thickness of
girder = bw*(D-tts)*25 = 12.00 top slab
Wearing surface = 4.95
sum WDL = 27.95 kN/m
Diaphragms:
Conc. Load P1 = 11.25 kN
L
WDL
P1 ( KN)
P1
WDL= 27.95 kN/m
P1= 11.25 kN
P2= 11.25 kN
L= 18.50 m
Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures
AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 21
Shear Forces and Bending Moments due to Dead Loads on
Interior Girder
VDL(x)= P1/2+W(L/2-X)
MDL(x)= P2X/2+WX/2(L-X)
x
(m)
VDL
(kN)
MDL
(kNm)
0.00 330.07 0.00
0.925 297.62 295.51
1.850 265.18 561.01
2.775 232.74 796.50
3.700 200.29 1001.98
4.625 167.85 1177.45
5.550 135.40 1322.90
6.475 102.96 1438.35
7.400 70.51 1523.78
8.325 38.07 1579.20
9.250 5.63 1604.61
Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures
AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 22
6.1.2 Live Loads
P/4 P P
(4.3m - 9.0m)
(4.3m)
P=wheel load =72.5KN
LONGITUDNAL ARRANGEMENT
P P
(1.8m)
TRANSVERSE ARRANGEMENT
P P
(1.8m)
TRANSVERSE ARRANGEMENT
P P
(1.2m)
LONGITUDNAL ARRANGEMENT
P=wheel load =1/2*110KN=55KN
a) Design Truck Load : HL-93
b) Design Tandem
The design lane load shall consist of a load of 9.3kN/m, uniformly distributed in the longitudinal direction.
Transversely, the design lane load shall be assumed to be uniformly distributed over 3m width.
Lane load for exterior girder 4.495 kN/m
Load width=1.45
Ra=Rb= 41.58 kN
Lane load for interior girder 6.82 kN/m Load width=2.2
Ra=Rb= 63.09 kN
Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures
AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 23
6.1.2.1 Dynamic Load Allowance
Section 3.13, the vehicular dynamic load allowance IM
IM = 33%
The live loads shall be factored by 1+IM/100 = 1.33
6.1.2.2 Transverse Load Distribution
In designing sidewalks, slabs and supporting members, a wheel load should be located one foot from the face of the barrier
For the design of components other than the deck overhang, the design truck or tandem shall be positioned transversely such tha
load
is not closer than 600mm from the edge of the design lane. (Art 3.6.1.3.1 - AASHTO 2004 )
Distribution Factor for Shear (Sec. 13.4: Table 13-7 & 13-8)
Exterior Girder:
Case-1: One Design lane loaded
The lever rule is applied assuming that the slab is simply supported over the longitudinal beams (Table 13-8)
Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures
AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 24
The distribution coefficient to the exterior girder for shear
REX1 (shear)= if (C<(0.8+0.6), P/a*[(a -
d1)+(d2)],P/a*[(1.8-(C-(0.8+0.6))-(C-(0.8+0.6))]) = 0.95 P
Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures
AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 25
Case-2: Two or more design lanes loaded
The distribution of live load per lane for shear in exterior girder is determined according to the formulas given in Table 13-8.
REX2 (shear) = (0.6+de/3000)*Rin shear = 0.692 per lane de= 0.900
This factor is for one wheel load, for axle load which is equivalent to two lines of wheels should be multiplied by 2 Ok
REX2 (shear) = (0.64+de/3800)*Rin shear = 1.384 P Ok
Therefore, REX (shear) in exterior girder is maximum of the above two values, REX1 or REX2
REX (shear) = 1.384 P
Interior Girder:
Case-1: One Design lane loaded
The distribution of live load per lane for shear in interior girder is determined according to the formulas given in Table 13-7.
RINT 1 (shear) = (0.36+S/7600) = 0.649 per lane where 1100<=S<=4900
6000<=L<=73000
890<=d<=2800
For two lines of wheels (axle load) Nb>=4 ok
RINT 1 (shear) = 1.299 P S=
de= distance from outside face of exterior girder to interior edge of curb or traffic barrier. It is positive if the exterior
web is inboard of the curb and negative if it is outboard de=C-bw/2-0.4
Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures
AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 26
L=SPAN LENGTH
d=over all depth of a girder
S is the girder spacing
Nc is the number of cells
Case-2: Two or more design lanes are loaded
The distribution of live load per lane for shear in interior girder
RINT 1 (shear) = 0.2+S/3600-[S/10700]^2 =
For two lines of wheels (axle load)
RINT 2 (shear) =
Therefore, RINT (shear), in interior girder is maximum of the above two values, RINT 1 or RINT 2
RINT (shear) =
Distribution Factor for moment (Sec.13.4: Table 13-3 and 13-4)
Exterior Girder
Case-1: One Design lane loaded
The distribution of live load per lane for moment in exterior girder (Use Lever
Rule)
(Table 4.6.2.2.2d-1 Distribution of Live
Loads Per Lane for Moment in Exterior
Longitudinal Beams.)
REXT1 (moment)= if (C<(0.8+0.6), P/a*[(a-d1)+(d2
)],P/a*[(1.8-(C-(0.8+0.6))-(C-(0.8+0.6))]) = 1.045 P S=2.2
Case-2: Two or more design lanes loaded de= 0.9
Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures
AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 27
REXT2 (moment) = (0.77+de/2800) = 1.091 P
The distribution factor for wheel load (i.e. two lines of wheels) is 2 times the maximum of the above two values
Rext (moment)= 2.183 P
Interior Girder
Case-1: One Design lane loaded
The distribution factor of live load per lane for moment in interior girder:
RINT1(moment) =0.06+(S/4300)^0.4*(S/L)^0.3*(Kg/Lts^3)^0.1
Case-2: Two or more design lanes loaded
RINT2(moment) =0.075+(S/4300)^0.64*(S/L)^0.2*(Kg/Lts^3)^0.1 0.512
The distribution factor for wheel load (i.e. two lines of wheels) is 2 times the maximum of the above two values
RINT (moment) = 1.024 P
6.1.2.3 Shear Forces and Bending Moments due to Live Loads
a) Influence Lines for Shear Forces and Bending Moments
a-1) Design Truck: HL-93
Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures
AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 28
Influence Lines for Shear Force at "x" distance from end support
Influence Lines for Bending Moment at "x" distance from end support
Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures
AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 29
Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures
AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 30
a-2) Design Tandem
Influence Lines for Shear Force at 'x' distance from end support
Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures
AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 31
Influence Lines for Bending Moments at 'X' distance from end support
b) Shear forces due to Live load plus impact
b-1) Exterior Girder
Design Truck: VLL + IM = (1.00+IM )*(Dist. Factor)*(Ptruck)* (A+B+C/4) IM = 33%
Design Tandem: VLL + IM = (1.00+IM )*(Dist. Factor)*(Ptandem)*(A+B+C) L = 18.50
Dist. Factor = 1.38
P truck= 72.50
P tandem= 55.00
Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures
AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 32
x
(m)
Live Load 1:
Design Truck
Coefficients VLL+IM
A B C D E F
0 1.000 0.768 0.535 - - -
253.72
0.925 0.950 0.718 0.485 - - - 238.71
1.85 0.900 0.668 0.435 - - - 223.70
2.775 0.850 0.618 0.385 - - - 208.69
3.7 0.800 0.568 0.335 - - - 193.67
4.625 0.750 0.518 0.285 - - - 178.66
5.55 0.700 0.468 0.235 - - - 163.65
6.475 0.650 0.418 0.185 - - - 148.64
7.4 0.600 0.368 0.135 - - - 133.62
8.325 0.550 0.318 0.085 - - - 118.61
9.25 0.500 0.268 0.035 - - - 103.60
Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures
AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 33
Live Load 2:
Design Tandem
VLL+I
(MAX)
Coefficients VLL+IM
A B C D (kN)
1.000 0.935 0.124 0.059 214.50 253.72
0.950 0.885 0.074 0.009 194.26 238.71
0.900 0.835 0.024 - 178.11 223.70
0.850 0.785 - - 165.53 208.69
0.800 0.735 - - 155.41 193.67
0.750 0.685 - - 145.28 178.66
0.700 0.635 - - 135.16 163.65
0.650 0.585 - - 125.04 148.64
0.600 0.535 - - 114.91 133.62
0.550 0.485 - - 104.79 118.61
0.500 0.435 - - 94.67 103.60
Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures
AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 34
b-2) Interior Girder
Design Truck: VLL + IM = (1.00+IM )*(Dist. Factor)*(Ptruck)* (A+B+C/4) IM = 33%
Design Tandem: VLL + IM = (1.00+IM )*(Dist. Factor)*(Ptandem)*(A+B) L = 18.50m
Dist. Factor = 1.538
P truck= 72.50kN
P tandem= 55.00 kN
x
(m)
Live Load 1:
Design Truck
Coefficients VLL+IM
A B C D E F (kN)
0 1.000 0.768 0.535 - - - 281.91
0.925 0.950 0.718 0.485 - - - 265.23
1.85 0.900 0.668 0.435 - - - 248.55
2.775 0.850 0.618 0.385 - - - 231.87
3.7 0.800 0.568 0.335 - - - 215.19
4.625 0.750 0.518 0.285 - - - 198.51
5.55 0.700 0.468 0.235 - - - 181.83
6.475 0.650 0.418 0.185 - - - 165.15
7.4 0.600 0.368 0.135 - - - 148.47
8.325 0.550 0.318 0.085 - - - 131.79
9.25 0.500 0.268 0.035 - - - 115.11
Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures
AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 35
Live Load 2:
Design Tandem
VLL+I
(MAX)
Coefficients VLL+IM
A B C D (kN) (kN)
1.000 0.935 0.124 0.059 238.34 281.91
0.950 0.885 0.074 0.009 215.84 265.23
0.900 0.835 0.024 - 197.91 248.55
0.850 0.785 - - 183.92 231.87
0.800 0.735 - - 172.67 215.19
0.750 0.685 - - 161.43 198.51
0.700 0.635 - - 150.18 181.83
0.650 0.585 - - 138.93 165.15
0.600 0.535 - - 127.68 148.47
0.550 0.485 - - 116.43 131.79
0.500 0.435 - - 105.18 115.11
Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures
AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 36
c) Bending Moments due to Live load plus impact
c-1) Exterior Girder
Design Truck: VLL + IM = (1.00+IM )*(Dist. Factor)*(Ptruck)* Max(Sum Coeff's)
IM = 33%
Design Tandem: VLL + IM = (1.00+IM )*(Dist. Factor)*(Ptandem)*(A+B) L = 18.5 m
Dist. Factor =2.18
P truck=72.5 kN
P tandem=55.0 kN
Design Truck Load Case 1
x Coef. ( Loading 1 ) sum Coef.
(m) A B C/4 D E F/4 A+B+C/4+D+E+F/4
0 - - - - - - -
0.925 0.88 0.66 0.11 - - - 1.65
1.85 1.67 1.24 0.20 - - - 3.10
2.775 2.36 1.71 0.27 - - - 4.34
3.7 2.96 2.10 0.31 - - - 5.37
4.625 3.47 2.39 0.33 - - - 6.19
5.55 3.89 2.60 0.33 - - - 6.81
6.475 4.21 2.70 0.30 - - - 7.21
7.4 4.44 2.72 0.25 - - - 7.41
8.325 4.58 2.64 0.18 - - - 7.40
Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures
AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 37
9.25 4.63 2.48 0.08 - - - 7.18
Design Truck Load Case 2
Coeff. ( Loading 2 ) sum Coef. Maximum MLL+IM
A B C/4 D E F/4 A+B+C/4+D+E+F/4 (kNm/m)
- - - - - - - -
- 0.88 0.166 - - - 1.045 348.28
- 1.67 0.309 - - - 1.974 652.76
- 2.36 0.428 - - - 2.787 913.43
- 2.96 0.525 - - - 3.485 1130.29
0.24 3.47 0.598 - - - 4.311 1303.34
0.88 3.89 0.649 - - - 5.409 1432.59
1.41 4.21 0.676 - - - 6.298 1518.04
1.86 4.44 0.680 - - - 6.980 1559.67
2.21 4.58 0.661 - - - 7.453 1568.81
2.48 4.63 0.619 - - - 7.719 1624.66
Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures
AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 38
When the live load is Design Tandem
Design Tandem Load
x Coefficients sum Coef. MLL+IM
(m) A B C D ( A + B + C ) (kNm/m)
0.000 - - - - - -
0.925 0.88 0.82 0.07 0.01 1.775 283.42
1.850 1.67 1.55 0.04 - 3.255 519.75
2.775 2.36 2.18 - - 4.538 724.53
3.700 2.96 2.72 - - 5.680 906.96
4.625 3.47 3.17 - - 6.638 1059.85
5.550 3.89 3.53 - - 7.410 1183.20
6.475 4.21 3.79 - - 7.998 1277.01
7.400 4.44 3.96 - - 8.400 1341.28
8.325 4.58 4.04 - - 8.618 1376.01
9.250 4.63 4.03 - - 8.650 1381.20
c-2) Interior Girder
Design Truck: VLL + IM = (1.00+IM )*(Dist. Factor)*(Ptruck)* Max(Sum Coeff's) IM = 33%
Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures
AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 39
Design Tandem: VLL + IM = (1.00+IM )*(Dist. Factor)*(Ptandem)*(A+B) L = 18.50
Dist. Factor =1.024
P truck=72.50
P tandem=55.00
When the live load is Design Truck
Design Truck Load Case 1
x Coef. ( Loading 1 ) sum Coef.
(m) A B C/4 D E F/4 A+B+C/4+D+E+F/4
0 - - - - - - -
0.925 0.88 0.66 0.11 - - - 1.65
1.85 1.67 1.24 0.20 - - - 3.10
2.775 2.36 1.71 0.27 - - - 4.34
3.7 2.96 2.10 0.31 - - - 5.37
4.625 3.47 2.39 0.33 - - - 6.19
5.55 3.89 2.60 0.33 - - - 6.81
6.475 4.21 2.70 0.30 - - - 7.21
7.4 4.44 2.72 0.25 - - - 7.41
8.325 4.58 2.64 0.18 - - - 7.40
9.25 4.63 2.48 0.08 - - - 7.18
Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures
AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 40
Design Truck Load Case 2
Coef. ( Loading 2 ) Sum Coef. Maximum,MLL+IM
A B C/4 D E F/4 A+B+C/4+D+E+F/4 (kNm/m)
- - - - - - - -
- 0.88 0.166 - - - 1.045 163.364
- 1.67 0.309 - - - 1.974 306.180
- 2.36 0.428 - - - 2.787 428.448
- 2.96 0.525 - - - 3.485 530.168
0.24 3.47 0.598 - - - 4.311 611.341
0.88 3.89 0.649 - - - 5.409 671.966
1.41 4.21 0.676 - - - 6.298 712.043
1.86 4.44 0.680 - - - 6.980 731.573
2.21 4.58 0.661 - - - 7.453 735.862
2.48 4.63 0.619 - - - 7.719 762.055
Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures
AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 41
When the live load is Design Tandem
Design Tandem Load
Maximum, MLL+IM
x Coefficients Sum Coef.
(m) A B C D ( A + B + C+D )
0 - - - - - -
0.925 0.88 0.82 0.07 0.01 1.78 132.94
1.85 1.67 1.55 0.04 - 3.26 243.79
2.775 2.36 2.18 - - 4.54 339.84
3.7 2.96 2.72 - - 5.68 425.41
4.625 3.47 3.17 - - 6.64 497.13
5.55 3.89 3.53 - - 7.41 554.99
6.475 4.21 3.79 - - 8.00 598.99
7.4 4.44 3.96 - - 8.40 629.13
8.325 4.58 4.04 - - 8.62 645.42
9.25 4.63 4.03 - - 8.65 647.86
6.1.3 Seismic Force Effects
Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures
AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 42
Earthquake zones: EBCS Zone -4
Site Coefficient: Type I = 1.5
Acceleration coefficient(A): =
The horizontal seismic force is the product of the site coefficient, the acceleration coefficient and the permanent load
Computation of permanent loads:
Railing and posts = 131.81 kN
Sidewalks = 869.50 kN
Top Slab = 638.25 kN
Girders= 777.00 kN
Diaphrams= 135.00 kN
Asphalt = 303.86 kN
Sum Wp = 2855.43 kN
Horizontal earhquake force FH = site coeff.*A* Wp = 428.31
This force is transferred to the substructure through the bearings located at ends of the bridge
Earthquake force transferred to one support = 1/2*FH = 214.16
This force is applied horizontally to the bearings
Total Dead Load reaction at one support = 1427.71
Assume coef. of friction between bearing and concrete seat at abut, µ= 0.50
The frictional resistance force developed between the interface = µ*Dead load Rxn
= 713.86
So Earthquake effects are negligible!!
Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures
AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 43
6.1.4 FACTORED LOADS
Load Factors and Load Combinations
The load factors and load combinations are according to ERA's Bridge Design Manual 2002, section 3.3
The load combination to be used for design is Strenght - I Limit state, Table 3-1.
Factored Load = gb *DL + 1.75* ( LL + IM ) = 1.25*DL+1.75*(LL+IM) gb =1.25
Factored Shear Forces
Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures
AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 44
x
Exterior Girder Interior Girder
Design
S.F.
VDL Vlane VLL+I
1.25VDL+
1.75VLL+IM+
1.75Vlane VDL Vlane VLL+I
1.25VDL+
1.75VLL+IM+
1.75Vlane Vmax
(m) (kN) (kN) (kN) (kN) (kN) (kN) (kN) (kN) (kN)
0.00 330.07 41.58 253.72 929.36 330.07 63.09 281.9 1016.33 1016.33
0.925 297.62 37.42 238.71 855.26 297.62 56.78 265.2 935.55 935.55
1.85 265.18 33.26 223.70 781.16 265.18 50.47 248.6 854.76 854.76
2.775 232.74 29.11 208.69 707.05 232.74 44.16 231.9 773.98 773.98
3.7 200.29 24.95 193.67 632.95 200.29 37.85 215.2 693.19 693.19
4.63 167.85 20.79 178.66 558.85 167.85 31.54 198.5 612.40 612.40
5.55 135.40 16.63 163.65 484.74 135.40 25.23 181.8 531.62 531.62
6.475 102.96 12.47 148.64 410.64 102.96 18.93 165.2 450.83 450.83
7.4 70.51 8.32 133.62 336.54 70.51 12.62 148.5 370.05 370.05
8.325 38.07 4.16 118.61 262.43 38.07 6.31 131.8 289.26 289.26
9.25 5.63 0.00 103.60 188.33 5.63 0.00 115.1 208.47 208.47
Factored Bending Moments
Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures
AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 45
Exterior Girder Interior Girder
Design
B.M.
x MDL Mlane MLL+IM
1.25MDL+
1.75MLL+IM+
1.75Mlane MDL Mlane MLL+IM
1.25MDL+
1.75MLL+IM+
1.75Mlane Mmax
(m) (kNm) (kNm) (kNm) (kNm) (kNm) (kNm) (kNm) (kNm) (kNm)
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.00
0.925 295.51 36.54 348.28 1042.82 295.51 55.44 163.4 752.29 1042.82
1.85 561.01 69.23 652.76 1964.74 561.01 105.04 306.2 1420.89 1964.74
2.775 796.50 98.07 913.43 2765.75 796.50 148.80 428.4 2005.81 2765.75
3.7 1001.98 123.07 1130.29 3445.86 1001.98 186.73 530.2 2507.05 3445.86
4.625 1177.45 144.23 1303.34 4005.05 1177.45 218.83 611.3 2924.60 4005.05
5.55 1322.90 161.53 1432.59 4443.35 1322.90 245.09 672.0 3258.47 4443.35
6.475 1438.35 174.99 1518.04 4760.74 1438.35 265.51 712.0 3508.65 4760.74
7.4 1523.78 184.61 1559.67 4957.22 1523.78 280.10 731.6 3675.15 4957.22
8.325 1579.20 190.38 1568.81 5052.59 1579.20 288.85 735.9 3767.25 5052.59
9.25 1604.61 192.30 1381.20 4759.39 1604.61 291.77 762.1 3849.96 4759.39
6.2. DESIGN FOR FLEXURE
a) Design Loads
The factored loads in the above tables are the design loads and the structure shall be
designed to carry the expected design loads as calculated above
Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures
AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 46
b) Effective Compression Flange Width, beff, ( AASHTO Art. 4.6.2.6.1)
Exterior Girder
For exterior beams, the effective flange width may be taken as one-half the effective width of the
adjacent interior beam, plus the least of:
a. 1/8 effective span length = 2.31m L = 18.5 m
b.
6 times the average thickness of the slab, plus the
greater of half the web thickness or one-quarter of
the width of the top flange of the basic girder = 1.75m hf=200 mm
c. The width of the overhang = 1.00m Bw=400 mm
beff < 1/2*Effective width of interior girder + minimum value of
= 2.10m
Overhand =1.0 m
Clear girder spac. =
1.8 m
Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures
AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 47
Interior Girder
The effective compression flange width, beff, is the minimum of the following:
a. 1/4 span = 4.63 m
b.
12 times the average thickness of the slab, plus the greater of web thickness or one-half
of the width of the top flange of the girder = 2.80
c. The average spacing of the adjacent beam = 2.20
Effective compression flange width, beff = 2.20
Use compression flange width, beff = 2.10
c) Spacing Limits for Reinforcements ( AASHTO 2004 - Art. 5.10.3.1.1)
Horizontal
In cast-in-place concrete, the clear distance between parallel bars in a layer shall not be less than:
1.5 times bar diameter = 48 mm Assume d=32
1.5 times the
max. size of
coarse
aggregate
(i.e.25.4mm)
= = 38 mm
38mm
= 38 mm
Hence the minimum clear distance between parallel bars in
a layer with no lapping is = 48 mm =
Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures
AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 48
Assuming vertical lapping of bars, one over the other, The minimum clear distance between parallel bars in a layer
is = 48 mm
Therefore, the minimum center to center spacing of bars in a layer is = 80 mm
Use center to center spacing of bars in a layer = 80 mm
Therefore, the minimum center to center spacing of bars in a layer with overlap is = 112 mm
Use center to center spacing of bars in a layer = 120 mm
Vertical
Minimum clear distance between two layers of bars is 1 inch or dia of bar = 32 mm
Thus, minimum center to center spacing of bars when there is lap = 96 mm
Use vertical center to center spacing of bars b/n layers = 100 mm
d) Section Capacity and Reinforcement
The maximum design moment is:
Mmax = 5,052.59 kNm Cover(mm)= 40
Try No of bars ф of bars ai di(m) ai*di
G0 1st row = 4 32 3217 0.072 232
G1 2nd row = 4 32 3217 0.080 257
G2 3rd row = 4 32 3217 0.088 283
G3 4th row = 4 32 3217 0.096 309
16 12868 1081
D = 1.400 m
Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures
AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 49
d' = sum ai*di = 0.084 m
sum ai
d = D - d' = 1.316 m
b = 2.100 m
Assume rectangular beam analysis
As= 12,868 mm2
b = 2.100 m
d = 1.316 m
fy = 400.0 MPa
fc' = 24.00 Mpa
bw = 0.400 m
hf = 0.20 m
Ø = 0.90 m
r= As/bd = 0.00466
a = As*fy/(0.85*fc'*b) 120.15 mm
It is rectangular beam as assumed
ØMn =Ø*As*fy*(d-a/2) 5,818.03 kNm
The following computations for T-beam analysis do not apply
Asf = 0.85*fc'*(b-bw)*hf/fy = - mm2
M1=Asf*fy*(d-hf/2) = - kNm
Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures
AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 50
a = (As - Asf)*fy/(0.85*fc'*bw) = - mm
M2 =(As - Asf)*fy*(d-a/2) = - kNm
Mu = M1 + M2 = - kNm
ØMu = Ø ( M1 + M2 ) = - kNm
Therefore, the
section capacity is
ØMn = 5818.03 kN-m >> Mmax = 5,05,59 kN - m
e) Checking maximum steel area
rf = Asf/b'wd = 0.00211 b' bot-flange reinf.dist- width = 2.10 m
rmax = 0.75*rb = 0.75*0.85*b1*(fc'/fy)*(600/(600+fy)+rf) b1=0.85
= 0.0195 fc' = 24 MPa
rprovided = (As-Asf)/bwd = 0.0047 << rmax fy =400 MPa
OK !!
f) Check for minimum reinforcement (ERA BDM Section 9.4.5)
i. The minimum reinforcement criteria: - AASHTO 2004, Art. 5.7.3.3.2
ØMn > = minimum of 1.2Mcr. or 1.33 Mu
Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures
AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 51
ØMn > = 1.2Mcr.
btop= 2.10 m
hf= 0.20 m
bw= 0.40 m
D= 1.40 m
hbot= 0.15 m
bbot= 2.10 m
length accommodating the reinforcement is
taken
Mcr = fr * Ig / yt
fr = 0.63 * SQRT( fc' ) = 3.086 N/mm2
Centroid of cross section
y1=Sum(Ai*yi)/(sumAi) =
Sum Ai*yi = 0.853 m3
Sum Ai = 1.155 m2
Yt=Sum(Ai*yi)/(sumAi) = 0.739 m
Gross moment of inertia, Ig, about centroid
I1=1/12*btop*hf
3
+ A1*d1
2
= 0.1338 m4
I2=1/12*bw*(D - hf -hbot)3
+ A2*d2
2
= 0.0403 m4
I3=1/12*bbot*(hbot )3
+ A3*d3
2
= 0.1393 m4
Sum Ig = 0.3134 m4
Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures
AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 52
The crackimg moment, Mcr,
Mcr = fr * Ig / yt = 1,309.37 KNm
1.2Mcr = 1,571.25 KNm
Mmax = 5,052.59 KNm >>
OK!
ii. The minimum reinforcement criteria: - AASHTO 2004, Art. 5.7.3.3.2
rmin = 0.03*fc'/fy = 0.0018
r = As/bd = 0.0244 b= bw = 0.40
OK!
g) Serviceability Requirements
Fatigue stress limits ( ERA BDM Section 9.6.2 ) or (AASHTO LRFD Art. 5.5.3.2)
Fatigue stress limits will be checked for the service load conditions. The permissible stress range is given by Eq. 9.19.
ff = 145 - 0.33 fmin + 55 (r/h)
k = [rn+0.5(ts/d)2
] / (rn+(ts/d) = 0.258
k*d = 0.339 m
T-beam
If it is rectangular beam
Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures
AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 53
j = 1 - k/3 = -
If it is T-beam
j = 6 - 6(hf/d)+2(hf/d)2
- (hf/d)3
/(2pn) = 0.935
6 - 3 (hf/d)
The minimum stress, fmin , is : (the minimum stress is created when there is no vehicle moving on the brid
fmin = MDL/(As*j*d) = 101.39 N/mm2
The maximim stress, fmax, is caused by the total load ( MDL+LL+IM ) (the maximum stress is created when the
vehicle is moving on the bridge, i.e., due to the self weight + moving load)
fmax = (MDL+LL+IM) /(As*j*d) = 200.51 N/mm2
The actual stress range, delta ff, is:
Delta ff = fmax - fmin = 99.12 N/mm2
The fatigue stress limit, ff, is
ff = 145 - 0.33* fmin + 55 (r/h) = 128.04 N/mm2 >>
OK !!
Control of Cracking by Distribution of Reinforcement (Sec. 9.4.5)
To control flexural cracking of the concrete, tension reinforcement shall be well distributed within maximum flexural zones.
Components shall be so proportioned that the tensile stress in the steel reinforcement at service limit state, fs, does not exceed
fsa = Z / (dc*A)1/3
< = 0.6*fy
Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures
AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 54
A = Effective tension area/ No. of bars=bw*(2y')/N= 0.00420, y’ = d’ = 0.084 m
dc = distance measured from extreme tension fiber to
center of the closest bar = 0.072; bw = 0.40
Z = crack width parameter, assumed = 30.00 ; No of bars = 16
Therefore, for crack control the maximum allowable stress is
fsa = Z / (dc*A)1/3 <=0.6fy = 240.00 fsa = 240 MPa
The maximim stress, fmax, at service load is
fmax = (MDL+MLL+IM) /(As*j*d) = 200.51
OK
h) Bar Cutting
Development of Reinforcement (ERA BDM Sec. 9.4.3)or AASHTO, Art. 5.11.1.2.2
Positive moment reinforcement: Atleast one-third of the positive moment reinforcement in simple span
members shall extend along the same face of the member beyond the centerline of the support.
The basic development length, ldb, in mm is
For bars diam. 35 and smaller, ldb = 0.02Ab*fy/sqrt(fc') >=0.06db*fy db=
ldb = 0.02Ab*fy/sqrt(fc') = 1313 mm fy= 400
fc'= 24.0
The tension development length,ld, is 0.06db*fy= 768.0
ld = ldb * modification factor = 1313 mm mod. Factor = 1.00
Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures
AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 55
Modification factor 2 taken to account for clear spacing between bars
Lap splices of Reinforcement in Tension
The length of lap for tension lap splices shall not be less than either 300mm or the 1.3 times the development
length
Lap splices for diam. 32 bar = 1,707 mm
Flexural Reinforcement Extension Length (Sec. 9.4.5)
Except at supports of simple spans and at the free ends of cantilevers, reinforcement shall be extended beyond the point at
which it is no longer required to resist flexure for a distance not less than:
a) the effective depth of the member = 1.32 m
b) 15 times the nominal diameter of bar = 0.48 m
c) 1/20 of the clear span = 0.90 m
Therefore, extension length is max. of the above
values and development length ld = 1.32 m
x
(m)
Mx
(KNm) 4Æ32 8Æ32 12Æ32 16Æ32 0Æ32
0.00 0.000 1520.59 2997.12 4415.70 5780.97 0.00
0.93 1042.82 1520.59 2997.12 4415.70 5780.97 0.00
Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures
AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 56
1.85 1964.74 1520.59 2997.12 4415.70 5780.97 0.00
2.78 2765.75 1520.59 2997.12 4415.70 5780.97 0.00
3.70 3445.86 1520.59 2997.12 4415.70 5780.97 0.00
4.63 4005.05 1520.59 2997.12 4415.70 5780.97 0.00
5.55 4443.35 1520.59 2997.12 4415.70 5780.97 0.00
6.48 4760.74 1520.59 2997.12 4415.70 5780.97 0.00
7.40 4957.22 1520.59 2997.12 4415.70 5780.97 0.00
8.33 5052.59 1520.59 2997.12 4415.70 5780.97 0.00
9.25 4759.39 1520.59 2997.12 4415.70 5780.97 0.00
Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures
AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 57
D = 1.40 m
beff= 2.10 m
bw= 0.40 m
bw'= 2.10 m
hf= 0.20 m
f= 0.90
fy= 400 Mpa
f'c= 24 Mpa
n(no.of bottom bar) 4
Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures
AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 58
dc= 72 mm
Rectangular Analysis T Beam Analysis
fM= fAs*fy(d-a/2) Asf=.85*f'c*(beff-bw)*hf/fy
a=(As-Asf)fy/(.85*f'c*bw)
M1=Asf*fy(d-hf/2)
M2=(As-Asf)fy*(d-a/2)
fM= f(M1+M2)
No. of bars
Total No.
of bars Diam.(mm) As(mm2)
y
bar(mm)
d=D-
ybar(mm) r = As/bd
a=As*fy/
(.85*f'cbef
f) R or T fMr
4 4 32 3217 72 1328.00 0.001 30.037 R 1520.59
4 8 32 6434 80 1324.00 0.002 60.075 R 2997.12
4 12 32 9651 88 1316.00 0.003 90.112 R 4415.70
4 16 32 12868 96 1308.00 0.005 120.149 R 5780.97
x
(m)
Mx
(KNm)
Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures
AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 59
0.00 0.000
0.925 1042.823
1.850 1964.740
2.775 2765.751
3.700 3445.856
4.625 4005.055
5.550 4443.348
6.475 4760.736
7.400 4957.218
8.325 5052.592
9.25 4759.392
covered dis
Type No. of bars R or T Resisting Moment
x for
moment From to length of bar
G0 4 R 1,520.59 1.502 0 1.502 18.9
G1 4 R 2,997.12 3.28 1.502 3.28 15.50
G2 4 R 4,415.70 5.754 3.28 5.754 11.94
G3 4 R 5,780.97 10.25 3.28 10.25 11.94
Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures
AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 60
a = 1/2*circumf.+4*db = 630mm
e = 4*db = 4*32mm = 128mm
d
a
d = 10*db =320mm
Standard Hook Detail
e
Standard hook length = 0.63 M
4db = 128 mm
5db = 160 mm
Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures
AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 61
length=
Length of Flexural Reinforcement bars
resistance length total length
The bar
start at
x= d
Bar- G0 = 14* Diam. 32
bars 1520.59 9.24 19.74 m 0.050 1.328
Bar- G1 =4*diam.32 bars 2997.12 7.75 18.13 m 0.136 1.324
Bar- G2 =4*diam.32 bars 4415.70 5.97 14.57 m 1.914 1.324
Bar- G3 = 4*diam.32 bars 5780.97 5.97 14.57 m 1.914 1.324
Bar- G4 =4*diam.32 bars 0.00 0.00 2.63 m 7.884 1.324
i ) Skin Reinforcement
If the effective depth, de, of reinforced concrete member exceeds 900mm, longitudinal skin reinforcement shall be uniformly distributed
along both side faces of the member for a distance d/2 nearest the flexural tension reinforcement.
The area of skin reinforcement, Ask, in mm2/m of height on each side face shall not be less than
Ask > = 0.001*(de - 760) <= As/1200
Effective depth de = D - d' = 1050 mm > 900mm
Therefore, Skin Reinf. shall be provided!
Ask > = 0.001*(de - 760) = 290 mm2/m d = 1.322
Spacing = as/As * 1000 = 690 mm diam. = 16
Maximum spacing, Smax, lesser of d/6 or 300mm = 220 mm
Use diam. 16 mm bars c/c 200 mm G4
Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures
AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 62
6.3 DESIGN FOR SHEAR
Shear strength
Design of cross sections subject to shear shall be based on
Vu < = ØVn = Ø (Vc + Vs ) Ø = 0.900
where Vu = factored shear forces at the section
Vn = the nominal shear strength, determined as the lesser of Vn = Vc + Vs or Vn=0.25*fc'*bv*dv
Vc = the nominal shear strength provided by the concrete, determined by:
Vc = 0.083*b*SQRT(fc')*bv*dv, where b= 2.00
Vs = the nominal shear strength provided by the shear reinforcement
Vs = Av*fv*d / s
Shear strength provided by concrete
Shear stress provided by concrete
vc = 0.083*b*sqrt(fc') = 0.813 (MPa )
The shear strength carried by concrete,Vc=vc*bw*d= 0.813 *bw*d (N)
Shear strength provided by shear reinforcement
Where the factored shear force, Vu, exceeds shear strength ØVc, shear reinforcement shall be provided to satisfy
the equation, Vu < = ØVn = Ø ( Vc + Vs )
When shear reinforcement perpendicular to the axis of the member is used
Vs = Vu/Ø - Vc = Av*fy*d / s
There fore, spacing of shear reinforcement, s, is :
S = Av*fy*d / Vs = Av*fy*d/(Vu/Ø-Vc)=Av*fy*d/(Vu/Ø - 0.813*bw*d )
Minimum shear reinforcement ( Eq.12.34 )
Av = 0.083*sqrt(fc')*bw*S / fy fc' = 24MPa
Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures
AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 63
Smax = Av*fy / ( 0.083*sqrt(fc')*bw ) fy = 300MPa
Maximum spacing of shear reinforcement Av =diam.12= 226mm2
If Vu < 0.10*fc' * bw * d, S <= 0.8d <= 600mm 0.10*fc' * bw= 960N
If Vu >= 0.10*fc' * bw * d, S <= 0.4d <= 300mm
Sections located less than a distance 'd' from support may be designed for the same shear as that computed at a distance d
x
(m)
Vx
(KN)
0.00 1016.33
0.93 935.55
1.85 854.76
2.78 773.98
3.70 693.19
4.63 612.40
5.55 531.62
6.48 450.83
7.40 370.05
8.33 289.26
9.25 208.47
Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures
AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 64
Shear
reinforcement
x(m) Vu(KN) dv(m) Vc(KN) Vs(KN)
0.1*f'c*bw*
dv (KN)
Smax1
(mm)
Smax2
(mm) Scal.(mm)
Sprov.
(mm)
Actual/Recomm
ended Spacing
(mm)
0.00 1016.33 1.328 431.988 697.27 1274.88 600 417 129 129 80
0.93 935.55 2.394 778.750 260.75 2298.24 600 417 623 417 300
1.85 854.76 2.394 778.750 170.99 2298.24 600 417 950 417 300
2.78 773.98 2.394 778.750 81.22 2298.24 600 417 2000 417 300
3.70 693.19 2.369 770.617 0.00 2274.24 600 417 0 417 300
4.63 612.40 2.369 770.617 0.00 2274.24 600 417 0 417 300
5.55 531.62 2.369 770.617 0.00 2274.24 600 417 0 417 300
6.48 450.83 2.369 770.617 0.00 2274.24 600 417 0 417 300
7.40 370.05 2.344 762.485 0.00 2250.24 600 417 0 417 300
8.33 289.26 2.344 762.485 0.00 2250.2 600 417 0 417 300
9.25 208.47 2.344 762.485 0.00 2250.2 600 417 0 417 300
G5
6.4 DEFLECTION (Serviceabilty Requirement (AASHTO-Art. 5.7.3.6.2))
Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures
AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 65
6.4.1 Computation of Gross Moment of Inertia
A) Centroid of cross section
For simplicity of calculations, the slab surface is assumed level, i.e., without crossfall.
The center of gravity is calculated from bottom of girder
Part
Area, Ai
(m2)
Centroid, yi
(m)
Ai*yi
(m3) Centroid of area
Top Slab 1.80 1.30 2.340 y1=sum Ai*yi/(sum Ai)= 1.00
Bottom slab
Girder 1.68 0.68 1.134
Sum 3.48 3.47
B) Gross moment of
Inertia
Part
Area, Ai
(m2)
yi
(m)
ycg = yi-y1
(m)
Ig
(m4)
Ai*(ycg)2
(m3)
Ig+Ai*(ycg)2
(m4)
Top Slab 1.80 1.30 0.30 0.006000 0.164 0.1699
Bottom slab
Girder 1.68 0.68 0.32 0.154350 0.176 0.3299
Sum Ig = 0.4998 m4
C) Computation of Effective Moment of Inertia
Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures
AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 66
Ie = [ Mcr/Ma ]3
*Ig + [ 1 - (Mcr/Ma)3
] Icr < = Ig Mcr = cracking moment (N-mm)
fr = 0.63*sqrt(fc') = 3.09 N/mm2 fr = modulus of rupture of concrete as specified in
Mcr = fr*Ig / yt = 1545.19 kNm Article 5.4.2.6 (MPa)
yt = distance from the neutral axis to the extreme
D) Weight of superstructure tension fiber (mm)
Part
W
(KN)
W
(KN/m) Ma = maximum moment in a component at the stage
Top Slab 855.00 45.00 for which deformation is computed (N-mm)
Bottom Slab
Girder 798.00 42.00
Cross Girder 19.13 1.01
Sum W (KN/m) 88.01
Ma(Total Slab) = W*L2
/8 = 3,971
Ma = W*L2
/8
=
MDl ext.
=
W*L2
/8
= 6418.459
Ma = 6418.459 KNM
E) Transformed section
Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures
AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 67
fc
T
jd
c
C
fs
kd
d
nAs
kd
d
beff
bw
k*d = 0.339 m (previous calculation)
beff= 8.40 m
bw= 1.60 m
n= 8
As= 51,472 mm2
d= 1.316 m
d'= 0.084 m
D= 1.400 m
hf= 0.200 m
Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures
AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 68
j= 0.935 m
Centroid of cross section ( y1 measured from bottom)
Part
Area, Ai
(m2)
yi
(m)
Ai*yi
(m3)
Top Slab 1.80 1.30 2.34 y1=sum Ai*yi/(sum Ai)= 0.77
0.0000
Girder 6.72 0.68 4.536
Transformed steel,
nAs 0.41 0.08 0.035
Sum 8.93 6.91
Computation of Moment of Inertia of Cracked section, Icr
Part
Area, Ai
(m2)
ycg = yi-y1
(m)
Icg
(m4)
Ai*(ycg)2
(m3)
Ig+Ai*(ycg)2
(m4)
Slab 1.80 0.5263 0.004867 0.4986 0.5034
Girder 6.72 0.0987 0.154350 0.0655 0.2198
Transformed
steel, nAs 0.41 0.6897 - 0.1959 0.1959
Sum = 0.9191 m4
Effective moment of Inertia, Ie
Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures
AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 69
Ie = [ Mcr / Ma]3
* Ig + [ 1 - (Mcr/Ma)3
] Icr = 0.9133 m4 <= Ig = 0.50
Ie= 0.500
Computation of Dead Load Deflection using effective moment of Inertia, Ie.
i. Instantaneous deflection
The maximum deflection is calculated by using the formula;
Deflection, max. = 5*W*L4
/(384*E*Ie) = 18.5mm E = Ec=24,768 MPa
ii. Long term deflection W =150.03 kN/m
Long term deflection = Instantaneous deflection * factor L=18.5 m
The factor is :
If the instantaneous deflection is based on Ig : = 3
If the instantaneous deflection is based on Ie :3.00-1.2(As'/As)>=1.6 2
Therefore, the Long term deflection = 55 mm
Provide camber 60 mm at mid span of the bridge
Calculation of live load deflection using the effective moment of inertia
The live load deflection at mid -span for different loading conditions that is analogous to the moving
load pattern is given as follows:
Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures
AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 70
P
P P P/4
- When investigating the maximum absolute deflection, all design lanes should be loaded; and all
supporting components should be assumed to deflect equally.
- The live load portion of load combination Service I of Table 3-3( i.e, load factors for both live
and dead load equal to 1.0) with dynamic load allowance factor should be applied.
P with IM = 385.7 kN
**two
lane
loads
take
n
w lane load = 18.6 N/mm
def. Lane =5wL4
/(384EIe) = 0.57 mm
According to Chapter 3,
- The live load deflection should be taken as the larger of :
Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures
AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 71
* That resulting from the design truck alone, or
* That resulting from 25 percent of the design truck together with the design lane
load.
a x x1 x2 x3
delta 1
(mm)
delta 2
(mm)
delta 3
(mm)
total truck
load
deflection
Maximum
deflection (max
(truck,0.25*truc
k+lane)
0 0.000 9.900 14.20 18.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.57
0.05 0.925 8.975 13.28 17.58 0.61 0.57 0.15 1.33 1.33
0.1 1.850 8.050 12.35 16.65 1.15 1.19 0.53 2.87 2.87
0.15 2.775 7.125 11.43 15.73 1.58 1.82 1.07 4.46 4.46
0.2 3.700 6.200 10.50 14.80 1.87 2.38 1.68 5.93 5.93
0.25 4.625 5.275 9.58 13.88 2.01 2.85 2.31 7.17 7.17
0.3 5.550 4.350 8.65 12.95 1.98 3.19 2.90 8.07 8.07
0.35 6.475 3.425 7.73 12.03 1.80 3.38 3.40 8.58 8.58
0.4 7.400 2.500 6.80 11.10 1.46 3.41 3.79 8.66 8.66
0.45 8.325 1.575 5.88 10.18 1.00 3.27 4.03 8.30 8.30
0.5 9.250 0.650 4.95 9.25 0.43 2.98 4.11 7.53 7.53
Therefore, the maximum live load deflection is the
maximum of the tabulated values above.
Def. Live load Max = 8.66 mm
Allowable Live Load Deflection - AASHTO Art. 2.5.2.6.2
Allowable deflection = Span /800 = 23.13 mm
OK
!
Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures
AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 72

More Related Content

What's hot

Structural Design
Structural DesignStructural Design
Structural Design
Vj NiroSh
 
DESIGN OF CIRCULAR OVERHEAD WATER TANK.pptx
DESIGN OF CIRCULAR OVERHEAD WATER TANK.pptxDESIGN OF CIRCULAR OVERHEAD WATER TANK.pptx
DESIGN OF CIRCULAR OVERHEAD WATER TANK.pptx
subhashini214160
 
Basement wall design
Basement wall designBasement wall design
Basement wall design
CETCBIM
 
Design of combined footing ppt
Design of combined footing pptDesign of combined footing ppt
Design of combined footing ppt
Bharti Shinde
 
Numerical problem bearing capacity terzaghi , group pile capacity (usefulsear...
Numerical problem bearing capacity terzaghi , group pile capacity (usefulsear...Numerical problem bearing capacity terzaghi , group pile capacity (usefulsear...
Numerical problem bearing capacity terzaghi , group pile capacity (usefulsear...
Make Mannan
 
Singly reinforced beam ast - over reinforced
Singly reinforced beam   ast - over reinforcedSingly reinforced beam   ast - over reinforced
Singly reinforced beam ast - over reinforced
Selvakumar Palanisamy
 
Lecture 7 strap footing
Lecture 7  strap  footingLecture 7  strap  footing
Lecture 7 strap footing
Dr.Abdulmannan Orabi
 
onw way slab design
onw way slab designonw way slab design
onw way slab design
Palak Patel
 
23-Design of Column Base Plates (Steel Structural Design & Prof. Shehab Mourad)
23-Design of Column Base Plates (Steel Structural Design & Prof. Shehab Mourad)23-Design of Column Base Plates (Steel Structural Design & Prof. Shehab Mourad)
23-Design of Column Base Plates (Steel Structural Design & Prof. Shehab Mourad)
Hossam Shafiq II
 
Design of Cantilever retaining wall
Design of Cantilever retaining wallDesign of Cantilever retaining wall
Design of Cantilever retaining wall
Achuthan Karnnan
 
Soil pressure in etabs
Soil pressure in etabsSoil pressure in etabs
Soil pressure in etabs
Jacob shah
 
Singly reinforced beam design
Singly reinforced beam   designSingly reinforced beam   design
Singly reinforced beam design
Selvakumar Palanisamy
 
Acceptance criteria of cube
Acceptance criteria of cubeAcceptance criteria of cube
Acceptance criteria of cube
Santosh Shah
 
Doubly reinforced beam analysis
Doubly reinforced beam   analysisDoubly reinforced beam   analysis
Doubly reinforced beam analysis
Selvakumar Palanisamy
 
Design of beam
Design of beamDesign of beam
Design of beam
raunak khurana
 
Problems on bearing capacity of soil
Problems on bearing capacity of soilProblems on bearing capacity of soil
Problems on bearing capacity of soil
Latif Hyder Wadho
 
Isolated column footing
Isolated column footingIsolated column footing
Isolated column footing
kamariya keyur
 
Design of pile cap
Design of  pile capDesign of  pile cap
Design of pile cap
Puspendu Ray
 
Numerical problem and solution on pile capacity (usefulsearch.org) ( usefuls...
Numerical problem and solution on pile capacity (usefulsearch.org) ( usefuls...Numerical problem and solution on pile capacity (usefulsearch.org) ( usefuls...
Numerical problem and solution on pile capacity (usefulsearch.org) ( usefuls...
Make Mannan
 

What's hot (20)

Structural Design
Structural DesignStructural Design
Structural Design
 
report
reportreport
report
 
DESIGN OF CIRCULAR OVERHEAD WATER TANK.pptx
DESIGN OF CIRCULAR OVERHEAD WATER TANK.pptxDESIGN OF CIRCULAR OVERHEAD WATER TANK.pptx
DESIGN OF CIRCULAR OVERHEAD WATER TANK.pptx
 
Basement wall design
Basement wall designBasement wall design
Basement wall design
 
Design of combined footing ppt
Design of combined footing pptDesign of combined footing ppt
Design of combined footing ppt
 
Numerical problem bearing capacity terzaghi , group pile capacity (usefulsear...
Numerical problem bearing capacity terzaghi , group pile capacity (usefulsear...Numerical problem bearing capacity terzaghi , group pile capacity (usefulsear...
Numerical problem bearing capacity terzaghi , group pile capacity (usefulsear...
 
Singly reinforced beam ast - over reinforced
Singly reinforced beam   ast - over reinforcedSingly reinforced beam   ast - over reinforced
Singly reinforced beam ast - over reinforced
 
Lecture 7 strap footing
Lecture 7  strap  footingLecture 7  strap  footing
Lecture 7 strap footing
 
onw way slab design
onw way slab designonw way slab design
onw way slab design
 
23-Design of Column Base Plates (Steel Structural Design & Prof. Shehab Mourad)
23-Design of Column Base Plates (Steel Structural Design & Prof. Shehab Mourad)23-Design of Column Base Plates (Steel Structural Design & Prof. Shehab Mourad)
23-Design of Column Base Plates (Steel Structural Design & Prof. Shehab Mourad)
 
Design of Cantilever retaining wall
Design of Cantilever retaining wallDesign of Cantilever retaining wall
Design of Cantilever retaining wall
 
Soil pressure in etabs
Soil pressure in etabsSoil pressure in etabs
Soil pressure in etabs
 
Singly reinforced beam design
Singly reinforced beam   designSingly reinforced beam   design
Singly reinforced beam design
 
Acceptance criteria of cube
Acceptance criteria of cubeAcceptance criteria of cube
Acceptance criteria of cube
 
Doubly reinforced beam analysis
Doubly reinforced beam   analysisDoubly reinforced beam   analysis
Doubly reinforced beam analysis
 
Design of beam
Design of beamDesign of beam
Design of beam
 
Problems on bearing capacity of soil
Problems on bearing capacity of soilProblems on bearing capacity of soil
Problems on bearing capacity of soil
 
Isolated column footing
Isolated column footingIsolated column footing
Isolated column footing
 
Design of pile cap
Design of  pile capDesign of  pile cap
Design of pile cap
 
Numerical problem and solution on pile capacity (usefulsearch.org) ( usefuls...
Numerical problem and solution on pile capacity (usefulsearch.org) ( usefuls...Numerical problem and solution on pile capacity (usefulsearch.org) ( usefuls...
Numerical problem and solution on pile capacity (usefulsearch.org) ( usefuls...
 

Similar to Chap-5-T-Girder Example-1.pdf

Analysis and Design of Residential building.pptx
Analysis and Design of Residential building.pptxAnalysis and Design of Residential building.pptx
Analysis and Design of Residential building.pptx
DP NITHIN
 
IRJET- Design of the Support Structure for the Pipe Line System
IRJET- Design of the Support Structure for the Pipe Line SystemIRJET- Design of the Support Structure for the Pipe Line System
IRJET- Design of the Support Structure for the Pipe Line System
IRJET Journal
 
Design of Automated Circular Pedestrian Crossing at a Road Intersection
Design of Automated Circular Pedestrian Crossing at a Road IntersectionDesign of Automated Circular Pedestrian Crossing at a Road Intersection
Design of Automated Circular Pedestrian Crossing at a Road Intersection
IRJET Journal
 
Planing,designing and analysis of HI TECH SHOPPING MALL
Planing,designing and analysis of HI TECH SHOPPING MALLPlaning,designing and analysis of HI TECH SHOPPING MALL
Planing,designing and analysis of HI TECH SHOPPING MALL
Arshana Anu
 
final internship ppt.pptx
final internship ppt.pptxfinal internship ppt.pptx
final internship ppt.pptx
KiranKr32
 
IRJET - Design and Analysis of Residential Institute Building
IRJET - Design and Analysis of Residential Institute BuildingIRJET - Design and Analysis of Residential Institute Building
IRJET - Design and Analysis of Residential Institute Building
IRJET Journal
 
design of steel flyover
design of steel flyoverdesign of steel flyover
design of steel flyover
Peer Mohideen
 
Design of Football Stadium - Design Project for Civil Engineers
Design of Football Stadium - Design Project for Civil EngineersDesign of Football Stadium - Design Project for Civil Engineers
Design of Football Stadium - Design Project for Civil Engineers
Indhumathi1134
 
project ppt 2 pdf.pdf
project ppt 2 pdf.pdfproject ppt 2 pdf.pdf
project ppt 2 pdf.pdf
KarthikMasky
 
Structural design of 350 kl overhead water tank at telibagh,lucknow
Structural design of 350 kl overhead water tank at telibagh,lucknowStructural design of 350 kl overhead water tank at telibagh,lucknow
Structural design of 350 kl overhead water tank at telibagh,lucknow
Anchit Agrawal
 
350 kl overhead water intze tank design
350 kl overhead water intze tank design350 kl overhead water intze tank design
350 kl overhead water intze tank design
Harish Mahavar
 
Design of Steel Grillage Foundation for an Auditorium
Design of Steel Grillage Foundation for an AuditoriumDesign of Steel Grillage Foundation for an Auditorium
Design of Steel Grillage Foundation for an Auditorium
IRJET Journal
 
Final Paper on Study and Design of Footbridge to connect the first floor of C...
Final Paper on Study and Design of Footbridge to connect the first floor of C...Final Paper on Study and Design of Footbridge to connect the first floor of C...
Final Paper on Study and Design of Footbridge to connect the first floor of C...
IRJET Journal
 
Design of RCC Column footing
Design of RCC Column footingDesign of RCC Column footing
Design of RCC Column footing
Arun Kurali
 
IRJET- Design and Comparision of Flexible and Rigid Pavements
IRJET-  	  Design and Comparision of Flexible and Rigid PavementsIRJET-  	  Design and Comparision of Flexible and Rigid Pavements
IRJET- Design and Comparision of Flexible and Rigid Pavements
IRJET Journal
 
Residential Building using Pre-Engineered Steel Beam-Column(G+1)
Residential Building using Pre-Engineered  Steel Beam-Column(G+1)Residential Building using Pre-Engineered  Steel Beam-Column(G+1)
Residential Building using Pre-Engineered Steel Beam-Column(G+1)
Humaayun Mohamed
 
Single storey building design English version
Single storey building design English versionSingle storey building design English version
Single storey building design English version
Thien Nguyen
 
Analysis, Design, and Estimation of Multi-Storied Institutional Building by u...
Analysis, Design, and Estimation of Multi-Storied Institutional Building by u...Analysis, Design, and Estimation of Multi-Storied Institutional Building by u...
Analysis, Design, and Estimation of Multi-Storied Institutional Building by u...
IRJET Journal
 
Theatre building PPT.pptx
Theatre building PPT.pptxTheatre building PPT.pptx
Theatre building PPT.pptx
DivyaprabaN
 

Similar to Chap-5-T-Girder Example-1.pdf (20)

Analysis and Design of Residential building.pptx
Analysis and Design of Residential building.pptxAnalysis and Design of Residential building.pptx
Analysis and Design of Residential building.pptx
 
IRJET- Design of the Support Structure for the Pipe Line System
IRJET- Design of the Support Structure for the Pipe Line SystemIRJET- Design of the Support Structure for the Pipe Line System
IRJET- Design of the Support Structure for the Pipe Line System
 
Design of Automated Circular Pedestrian Crossing at a Road Intersection
Design of Automated Circular Pedestrian Crossing at a Road IntersectionDesign of Automated Circular Pedestrian Crossing at a Road Intersection
Design of Automated Circular Pedestrian Crossing at a Road Intersection
 
Planing,designing and analysis of HI TECH SHOPPING MALL
Planing,designing and analysis of HI TECH SHOPPING MALLPlaning,designing and analysis of HI TECH SHOPPING MALL
Planing,designing and analysis of HI TECH SHOPPING MALL
 
final internship ppt.pptx
final internship ppt.pptxfinal internship ppt.pptx
final internship ppt.pptx
 
IRJET - Design and Analysis of Residential Institute Building
IRJET - Design and Analysis of Residential Institute BuildingIRJET - Design and Analysis of Residential Institute Building
IRJET - Design and Analysis of Residential Institute Building
 
design of steel flyover
design of steel flyoverdesign of steel flyover
design of steel flyover
 
Isolated Footing
Isolated FootingIsolated Footing
Isolated Footing
 
Design of Football Stadium - Design Project for Civil Engineers
Design of Football Stadium - Design Project for Civil EngineersDesign of Football Stadium - Design Project for Civil Engineers
Design of Football Stadium - Design Project for Civil Engineers
 
project ppt 2 pdf.pdf
project ppt 2 pdf.pdfproject ppt 2 pdf.pdf
project ppt 2 pdf.pdf
 
Structural design of 350 kl overhead water tank at telibagh,lucknow
Structural design of 350 kl overhead water tank at telibagh,lucknowStructural design of 350 kl overhead water tank at telibagh,lucknow
Structural design of 350 kl overhead water tank at telibagh,lucknow
 
350 kl overhead water intze tank design
350 kl overhead water intze tank design350 kl overhead water intze tank design
350 kl overhead water intze tank design
 
Design of Steel Grillage Foundation for an Auditorium
Design of Steel Grillage Foundation for an AuditoriumDesign of Steel Grillage Foundation for an Auditorium
Design of Steel Grillage Foundation for an Auditorium
 
Final Paper on Study and Design of Footbridge to connect the first floor of C...
Final Paper on Study and Design of Footbridge to connect the first floor of C...Final Paper on Study and Design of Footbridge to connect the first floor of C...
Final Paper on Study and Design of Footbridge to connect the first floor of C...
 
Design of RCC Column footing
Design of RCC Column footingDesign of RCC Column footing
Design of RCC Column footing
 
IRJET- Design and Comparision of Flexible and Rigid Pavements
IRJET-  	  Design and Comparision of Flexible and Rigid PavementsIRJET-  	  Design and Comparision of Flexible and Rigid Pavements
IRJET- Design and Comparision of Flexible and Rigid Pavements
 
Residential Building using Pre-Engineered Steel Beam-Column(G+1)
Residential Building using Pre-Engineered  Steel Beam-Column(G+1)Residential Building using Pre-Engineered  Steel Beam-Column(G+1)
Residential Building using Pre-Engineered Steel Beam-Column(G+1)
 
Single storey building design English version
Single storey building design English versionSingle storey building design English version
Single storey building design English version
 
Analysis, Design, and Estimation of Multi-Storied Institutional Building by u...
Analysis, Design, and Estimation of Multi-Storied Institutional Building by u...Analysis, Design, and Estimation of Multi-Storied Institutional Building by u...
Analysis, Design, and Estimation of Multi-Storied Institutional Building by u...
 
Theatre building PPT.pptx
Theatre building PPT.pptxTheatre building PPT.pptx
Theatre building PPT.pptx
 

Recently uploaded

Sachpazis:Terzaghi Bearing Capacity Estimation in simple terms with Calculati...
Sachpazis:Terzaghi Bearing Capacity Estimation in simple terms with Calculati...Sachpazis:Terzaghi Bearing Capacity Estimation in simple terms with Calculati...
Sachpazis:Terzaghi Bearing Capacity Estimation in simple terms with Calculati...
Dr.Costas Sachpazis
 
Final project report on grocery store management system..pdf
Final project report on grocery store management system..pdfFinal project report on grocery store management system..pdf
Final project report on grocery store management system..pdf
Kamal Acharya
 
CFD Simulation of By-pass Flow in a HRSG module by R&R Consult.pptx
CFD Simulation of By-pass Flow in a HRSG module by R&R Consult.pptxCFD Simulation of By-pass Flow in a HRSG module by R&R Consult.pptx
CFD Simulation of By-pass Flow in a HRSG module by R&R Consult.pptx
R&R Consult
 
AKS UNIVERSITY Satna Final Year Project By OM Hardaha.pdf
AKS UNIVERSITY Satna Final Year Project By OM Hardaha.pdfAKS UNIVERSITY Satna Final Year Project By OM Hardaha.pdf
AKS UNIVERSITY Satna Final Year Project By OM Hardaha.pdf
SamSarthak3
 
Design and Analysis of Algorithms-DP,Backtracking,Graphs,B&B
Design and Analysis of Algorithms-DP,Backtracking,Graphs,B&BDesign and Analysis of Algorithms-DP,Backtracking,Graphs,B&B
Design and Analysis of Algorithms-DP,Backtracking,Graphs,B&B
Sreedhar Chowdam
 
MCQ Soil mechanics questions (Soil shear strength).pdf
MCQ Soil mechanics questions (Soil shear strength).pdfMCQ Soil mechanics questions (Soil shear strength).pdf
MCQ Soil mechanics questions (Soil shear strength).pdf
Osamah Alsalih
 
Top 10 Oil and Gas Projects in Saudi Arabia 2024.pdf
Top 10 Oil and Gas Projects in Saudi Arabia 2024.pdfTop 10 Oil and Gas Projects in Saudi Arabia 2024.pdf
Top 10 Oil and Gas Projects in Saudi Arabia 2024.pdf
Teleport Manpower Consultant
 
Railway Signalling Principles Edition 3.pdf
Railway Signalling Principles Edition 3.pdfRailway Signalling Principles Edition 3.pdf
Railway Signalling Principles Edition 3.pdf
TeeVichai
 
一比一原版(UofT毕业证)多伦多大学毕业证成绩单如何办理
一比一原版(UofT毕业证)多伦多大学毕业证成绩单如何办理一比一原版(UofT毕业证)多伦多大学毕业证成绩单如何办理
一比一原版(UofT毕业证)多伦多大学毕业证成绩单如何办理
ydteq
 
The Benefits and Techniques of Trenchless Pipe Repair.pdf
The Benefits and Techniques of Trenchless Pipe Repair.pdfThe Benefits and Techniques of Trenchless Pipe Repair.pdf
The Benefits and Techniques of Trenchless Pipe Repair.pdf
Pipe Restoration Solutions
 
ethical hacking in wireless-hacking1.ppt
ethical hacking in wireless-hacking1.pptethical hacking in wireless-hacking1.ppt
ethical hacking in wireless-hacking1.ppt
Jayaprasanna4
 
Pile Foundation by Venkatesh Taduvai (Sub Geotechnical Engineering II)-conver...
Pile Foundation by Venkatesh Taduvai (Sub Geotechnical Engineering II)-conver...Pile Foundation by Venkatesh Taduvai (Sub Geotechnical Engineering II)-conver...
Pile Foundation by Venkatesh Taduvai (Sub Geotechnical Engineering II)-conver...
AJAYKUMARPUND1
 
Planning Of Procurement o different goods and services
Planning Of Procurement o different goods and servicesPlanning Of Procurement o different goods and services
Planning Of Procurement o different goods and services
JoytuBarua2
 
The role of big data in decision making.
The role of big data in decision making.The role of big data in decision making.
The role of big data in decision making.
ankuprajapati0525
 
J.Yang, ICLR 2024, MLILAB, KAIST AI.pdf
J.Yang,  ICLR 2024, MLILAB, KAIST AI.pdfJ.Yang,  ICLR 2024, MLILAB, KAIST AI.pdf
J.Yang, ICLR 2024, MLILAB, KAIST AI.pdf
MLILAB
 
power quality voltage fluctuation UNIT - I.pptx
power quality voltage fluctuation UNIT - I.pptxpower quality voltage fluctuation UNIT - I.pptx
power quality voltage fluctuation UNIT - I.pptx
ViniHema
 
Architectural Portfolio Sean Lockwood
Architectural Portfolio Sean LockwoodArchitectural Portfolio Sean Lockwood
Architectural Portfolio Sean Lockwood
seandesed
 
Hybrid optimization of pumped hydro system and solar- Engr. Abdul-Azeez.pdf
Hybrid optimization of pumped hydro system and solar- Engr. Abdul-Azeez.pdfHybrid optimization of pumped hydro system and solar- Engr. Abdul-Azeez.pdf
Hybrid optimization of pumped hydro system and solar- Engr. Abdul-Azeez.pdf
fxintegritypublishin
 
Investor-Presentation-Q1FY2024 investor presentation document.pptx
Investor-Presentation-Q1FY2024 investor presentation document.pptxInvestor-Presentation-Q1FY2024 investor presentation document.pptx
Investor-Presentation-Q1FY2024 investor presentation document.pptx
AmarGB2
 
NO1 Uk best vashikaran specialist in delhi vashikaran baba near me online vas...
NO1 Uk best vashikaran specialist in delhi vashikaran baba near me online vas...NO1 Uk best vashikaran specialist in delhi vashikaran baba near me online vas...
NO1 Uk best vashikaran specialist in delhi vashikaran baba near me online vas...
Amil Baba Dawood bangali
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Sachpazis:Terzaghi Bearing Capacity Estimation in simple terms with Calculati...
Sachpazis:Terzaghi Bearing Capacity Estimation in simple terms with Calculati...Sachpazis:Terzaghi Bearing Capacity Estimation in simple terms with Calculati...
Sachpazis:Terzaghi Bearing Capacity Estimation in simple terms with Calculati...
 
Final project report on grocery store management system..pdf
Final project report on grocery store management system..pdfFinal project report on grocery store management system..pdf
Final project report on grocery store management system..pdf
 
CFD Simulation of By-pass Flow in a HRSG module by R&R Consult.pptx
CFD Simulation of By-pass Flow in a HRSG module by R&R Consult.pptxCFD Simulation of By-pass Flow in a HRSG module by R&R Consult.pptx
CFD Simulation of By-pass Flow in a HRSG module by R&R Consult.pptx
 
AKS UNIVERSITY Satna Final Year Project By OM Hardaha.pdf
AKS UNIVERSITY Satna Final Year Project By OM Hardaha.pdfAKS UNIVERSITY Satna Final Year Project By OM Hardaha.pdf
AKS UNIVERSITY Satna Final Year Project By OM Hardaha.pdf
 
Design and Analysis of Algorithms-DP,Backtracking,Graphs,B&B
Design and Analysis of Algorithms-DP,Backtracking,Graphs,B&BDesign and Analysis of Algorithms-DP,Backtracking,Graphs,B&B
Design and Analysis of Algorithms-DP,Backtracking,Graphs,B&B
 
MCQ Soil mechanics questions (Soil shear strength).pdf
MCQ Soil mechanics questions (Soil shear strength).pdfMCQ Soil mechanics questions (Soil shear strength).pdf
MCQ Soil mechanics questions (Soil shear strength).pdf
 
Top 10 Oil and Gas Projects in Saudi Arabia 2024.pdf
Top 10 Oil and Gas Projects in Saudi Arabia 2024.pdfTop 10 Oil and Gas Projects in Saudi Arabia 2024.pdf
Top 10 Oil and Gas Projects in Saudi Arabia 2024.pdf
 
Railway Signalling Principles Edition 3.pdf
Railway Signalling Principles Edition 3.pdfRailway Signalling Principles Edition 3.pdf
Railway Signalling Principles Edition 3.pdf
 
一比一原版(UofT毕业证)多伦多大学毕业证成绩单如何办理
一比一原版(UofT毕业证)多伦多大学毕业证成绩单如何办理一比一原版(UofT毕业证)多伦多大学毕业证成绩单如何办理
一比一原版(UofT毕业证)多伦多大学毕业证成绩单如何办理
 
The Benefits and Techniques of Trenchless Pipe Repair.pdf
The Benefits and Techniques of Trenchless Pipe Repair.pdfThe Benefits and Techniques of Trenchless Pipe Repair.pdf
The Benefits and Techniques of Trenchless Pipe Repair.pdf
 
ethical hacking in wireless-hacking1.ppt
ethical hacking in wireless-hacking1.pptethical hacking in wireless-hacking1.ppt
ethical hacking in wireless-hacking1.ppt
 
Pile Foundation by Venkatesh Taduvai (Sub Geotechnical Engineering II)-conver...
Pile Foundation by Venkatesh Taduvai (Sub Geotechnical Engineering II)-conver...Pile Foundation by Venkatesh Taduvai (Sub Geotechnical Engineering II)-conver...
Pile Foundation by Venkatesh Taduvai (Sub Geotechnical Engineering II)-conver...
 
Planning Of Procurement o different goods and services
Planning Of Procurement o different goods and servicesPlanning Of Procurement o different goods and services
Planning Of Procurement o different goods and services
 
The role of big data in decision making.
The role of big data in decision making.The role of big data in decision making.
The role of big data in decision making.
 
J.Yang, ICLR 2024, MLILAB, KAIST AI.pdf
J.Yang,  ICLR 2024, MLILAB, KAIST AI.pdfJ.Yang,  ICLR 2024, MLILAB, KAIST AI.pdf
J.Yang, ICLR 2024, MLILAB, KAIST AI.pdf
 
power quality voltage fluctuation UNIT - I.pptx
power quality voltage fluctuation UNIT - I.pptxpower quality voltage fluctuation UNIT - I.pptx
power quality voltage fluctuation UNIT - I.pptx
 
Architectural Portfolio Sean Lockwood
Architectural Portfolio Sean LockwoodArchitectural Portfolio Sean Lockwood
Architectural Portfolio Sean Lockwood
 
Hybrid optimization of pumped hydro system and solar- Engr. Abdul-Azeez.pdf
Hybrid optimization of pumped hydro system and solar- Engr. Abdul-Azeez.pdfHybrid optimization of pumped hydro system and solar- Engr. Abdul-Azeez.pdf
Hybrid optimization of pumped hydro system and solar- Engr. Abdul-Azeez.pdf
 
Investor-Presentation-Q1FY2024 investor presentation document.pptx
Investor-Presentation-Q1FY2024 investor presentation document.pptxInvestor-Presentation-Q1FY2024 investor presentation document.pptx
Investor-Presentation-Q1FY2024 investor presentation document.pptx
 
NO1 Uk best vashikaran specialist in delhi vashikaran baba near me online vas...
NO1 Uk best vashikaran specialist in delhi vashikaran baba near me online vas...NO1 Uk best vashikaran specialist in delhi vashikaran baba near me online vas...
NO1 Uk best vashikaran specialist in delhi vashikaran baba near me online vas...
 

Chap-5-T-Girder Example-1.pdf

  • 1. Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 1 Chapter 5: T-Girder Bridge Example SIMPLE SPAN R.C. T- GIRDER BRIDGE PART- I : SUPERSTRUCTURE DESIGN Consultant: XXXXX Project: YYYYY Name of Bridge: RRRRR Prepared by: Designer Checked by: Client Case: Statical calculation Date: Date-Month-Year 1. DESIGN DATA AND SPECIFICATIONS 1.1 Subject Information: Superstructure type:- Simple span R.C.T Girder Clear span : 18 m Clear Roadway 7.3 m concrete ( section 9.3) Curb 0.85 m 1.2 Material properties: Concrete :- Grade C - 30 concrete ( section 9.3) fc'= = 24 MPa (fc' cylinder ) fc=0.4*fc' = 10 MPa (For serviceability) Ec=.043γC 1.5 sqrt(fc') = 24,768 MPa
  • 2. Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 2 = 1.3 Reinforcement steel: Grade 400 steel: For rebars diam. above 16mm fy = 400 MPa fs = 200 MPa Es = 200,000 MPa S 5.4.3.2 Grade 300 steel: For rebars less than diam. 16 fy = 300 MPa fs = 150 MPa Es = 200,000 MPa S 5.4.3.2 Modular ratio n = Ec / Es = 8.07 Use n = 8 Live Loading: (1) Design Truck : HL-93 live load (2) Design Tandem Ptruck = 72.5 kN Lane load = 9.3 kN/m Ptandem = 55 kN
  • 3. Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 3 P/4 P P (4.3m - 9.0m) (4.3m) P=wheel load =72.5KN LONGITUDNAL ARRANGEMENT P P (1.8m) TRANSVERSE ARRANGEMENT P P (1.8m) TRANSVERSE ARRANGEMENT P P (1.2m) LONGITUDNAL ARRANGEMENT P=wheel load =1/2*110KN=55KN DESIGN TANDEM Design method: Load and Resistance Factor Design (LRFD) Method Reference: ERA's Bridge Design Manual 2002 AASHTO Standard Specifications for Highway Bridges, 1998, and latest version 2. BRIDGE CROSS SECTION
  • 4. Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 4
  • 5. Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 5 3.1 Given Data Clear Road way width, W1= 7.30 m Clear Road way width, W2= 0 m Sidewalk width, SW= 0.85 m Total bridge width, WT= 9.00 m No. of lane= 2 Multiple presence factor for double lane loading= 1.00 Multiple presence factor for single lane loading= 1.20 3.2 Preliminary Dimensions No. of girders= 4.00 width of support= 0.50 m expansion length left at both sides= 0.05 m c/c of support= 18.50 m Clear span plus depth of member = 19.40 m Design span length, S= 18.50 m Top slab thickness, T = 0.20 m Recommended min. girder depth=0.07*S= 1.30 m Use Girder depth D= 1.40 m c/c girder spacing, a = 2.20 m End of slab to center of exterior girder, c = 1.20 m Minimum Web width recommended, bw = 0.20 M
  • 6. Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 6 Use web width, bw = 0.40 m Clear span b/n girders = 1.80 m Wall slenderness ratio = 3.50 m Top slab thickness = 0.20 m Overhang slab thickness near ext. girder= 0.30 m Overhang slab length= 1.000 m fillet= 0.10 m Exterior diaphragm depth= 1.20 m Width of diaphragm= 0.25 m Number of exterior diaphragm= 2.00 Number of interior diaphragm= 2.00 Total number of diaphrams= 4 c/c spacing of diaphragms= 6.22 m Assumed wearing surface thickness= 0.10 m Crown slope in the transverse direction= 2.50 % depth of post= 0.30 m width of post= 0.25 m Average spacing between posts= 1.50 m Height of post 0.85 m depth of rail= 0.40 m
  • 7. Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 7 Width of rail= 0.25 m Face of rail from end of curb= 0.10 m Edge of post from exterior edge of curb= 0.05 m curb Top width= 0.85 m curb Bottom width= 1.00 m curb Top Height = 0.30 m curb Bottom Height= 0.25 m unit weight of rein. concrete= 25.00 kN/m3 unit weight of Asphalt= 22.50 kN/m3 ф for moment= 0.90 ф for shear= 0.90
  • 8. Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 8 4. DESIGN OF OVER HANG SLAB 4.1 Loads 4.1.1DeadLoad&Moments Dead loads (kN/m) Moment arm about face of exterior girder (m) MDL (kNm/m) W1= 2.50 0.775 1.938 W2= 1.06 0.825 0.877 W3= 6.38 0.575 3.666 W4= 3.13 0.333 1.042 Sum WDL = 13.06 MDL = 7.521
  • 9. Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 9 4.1.2 Live Loads i ) Design Truck Load & Moments The application of live load for the design of deck overhang is done according to AASHTO 1998, Art. 3.6.1.3 In designing sidewalks, slabs and supporting members, wheel load located on the sidewalk shall be 300mm from the face of the rail 0.3 m Distribution width for wheel loads (Art. 3.24.5.1.1) (AASHTO 4.6.2.1.3-Table 1) x = 0.350 m kN Assuming the worst case where the vehicle climb on the curb P = 72.5
  • 10. Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 10 E=0.833x+1140, where x=the distance in mm from load to point of support E = 1431.55 mm 1.43 m Live load moment per linear meter width of slab MLL= (P/E)*x= 17.73 kNm/m Dynamic Allowance Factor IM = 33% Live Load plus impact: MLL+IM = 23.57 kNm/m Railing Load E=0.833x+1140, where x=the distance in mm from load to point of support E = 1681.45 mm 1.681 m x =0.650 Live load moment per linear meter width of slab Ph=44.51 MRL= (Ph/E)*h= 34.41 kNm/m h=1.3 ii ) Design Tandem The design tandem wheel load, P = 55kN, is smaller than the design truck load, P=72.5kN, and hence not considered for for overhang design iii)Lane Load Longutidinal lane load distrbution=9.3kN/M 9.30 kN/M Transversal lane load distrbution=(9.3/3)kN/M= 3.10 kN/M
  • 11. Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 11 Mlane load = 1.55 kNm/m iv ) Pedestrian Live Load Pedestrian live load = 4.00 kN/m2 (AASHTO 2004 Art.3.6.1 Moment due to pedestrian load = 2.00 kNm/m Total Design Moment MTOT = 1.25*MDL + 1.75*MLL+IM = 75.84 kNm/m 4.2 Reinforcement 4.2.1 Reinforcement for Mtot As= Mu / ( Ø fy (d - a/2 ) ) a = As*fy / ( 0.85 * fc' b ) Mu = 75.84 kN-m/m Ø = 0.90 b = 1000 mm fy = 300 N/mm2 fc' = 24 N/mm2 D = 300 mm diam = 16 mm cover = 50 mm d = 242 mm Goal Seek 0.00 Assume a = 17.72 mm As = Mu / ( Ø fy (d - a/2 ) ) = 1,205 mm2/m
  • 12. Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 12 a = As*fy / ( 0.85 * fc' b ) = 17.72 mm Required As = 1205 mm2/m Required spacing = 160 mm Minimum Reinforcement (Art. 8.17.1) Fr = 0.63 * SQRT(fc') = 3.09 N/mm2 Icr = bh3 /12 = 2.250E+09 mm4 Mcr = fr * Icr / (yt) = 46.30 kNm/m Yt = d/2 1.2 * Mcr = 55.55 kNm/m Mdesign = 75.84 kNm/m OK!! Mu = 55.55 KNm/m Ø = 0.90 b = 1000 mm fy = 300 N/mm2 fc' = 24 N/mm2 D = 300 mm diam = 16 mm cover = 50 mm d = 242 mm
  • 13. Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 13 Assume a = 12.84 mm Goal Seek 0.00 As = Mu / ( Ø fy (d - a/2 ) ) 873 mm2 a = As*fy / ( 0.85 * fc' b ) = 12.84 mm OK !! Required As = 873 mm2/m Required spacing for minimum steel area = 230 mm S Provided= 160 mm Use diameter 16 mm bars c/c 160 mm As provided = 1,257 mm2 5. DESIGN OF DECK SLAB 5.1 Interior span slab 5.1.1 Loadings a) Dead Loads Dead loads computation Slab = 5.00 kN/m2 Asphalt 10cm thickness = 2.25 kN/m2 wDL = 7.25 kN/m2 MDL= (WDL*S2 *0.80)/8 where 0.80 is a continuity factor
  • 14. Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 14 Span length S = Clear span = 1.80 m MDL = 1/8( wDL*S2 *0.80) = 2.35 kNm/m b) Live Loads Live Load moment for continuous slab ( Art. 3.24.3.1) MLL = 1/32(S+2)P20*0.80 where S= span length in feet (Art. 3.24.1.2), S= 1.80 m MLL = = 3221.39 lb-ft/ft = P= 72.50 kN MLL = = 14.33 kNm/m Impact Factor (Art. 3.8.2.1) IM = 33% Live load plus impact MLL+IM = = 19.06 kNm/m Lane load P=9.3/3 = 3.10 kN/m Mlane = 1.00 kNm/m c) Factored Design moment Total Design moment MTOTAL = 1.25*MDL + 1.75*(MLL+IM +Mlane) = 38.04 kNm/m 5.1.2Reinforcement Goal Seek -0.01 Mu =38.04 Assume a = 15.44 mm Ø =0.90
  • 15. Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 15 As = Mu / ( Ø fy (d - a/2 ) ) 1,049 mm2 b =1000 a = As*fy / ( 0.85 * fc' b ) = 15.43 mm fy =300 OK !! fc' =24 D =200 diam =16 Required As = 1049 mm2/m cover =50 Spacing, s = 192 mm d =242 Use diameter 16 mm bars c/c 190 mm ( top and bottom reinf.-transverse) As provided = 1,058 mm2; S1,S2 For main reinforcement perpendicular to traffic, the distribution reinf. is given as percentage of the main slab reinf. as given below: As(distr.) % = 3840/sqrt(S) <= 67% Therefore, % As dist. = 91 % ( S is in feet) where; S= 1.8 m % As (distr.) = 67% 721.7847769 As dist. = 0.67 * As provided = 709 mm2/m spacing = 217.12 mm diam. of bar= 14 Use diam. 14 mm bars c/c 210 mm (bottom reinf. - Longtiudinal) As provided = 733 mm2 S3 For components less than 1200mm thick, the area of reinforcement in each direction shall not be less than: As (temp. & shrinkage) > 0.11*(Ag/fy) = 73.33 mm2/m
  • 16. Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 16 As (temp and shrink.)= 73.33 mm2/m Using diam. 12 bar spacing = 1542 mm diam. of bar = Use diam. 12 c/c 300 mm (top. reinf. ) S4 6. DESIGN OF LONGITUDINAL GIRDERS 6.1. Loads 6.1.1 DeadLoads a)ExteriorGirder
  • 17. Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 17 C= 1.20 m, cant. Span to center of support a= 2.20 m bw= 0.40 m Uniform dead loads per linear meter span (kN/m) W1= 2.50 W2= 1.06 W3 (EXTERIROR CURB)= 6.38 W4 3.13 W5=girder 14.00 W6=top slab 4.50 W8=Wearing surface 3.26 W9=Fillet 0.25 sum 35.08 Weight of Diaphragms: Conc. Load P1 = 5.63 kN Conc. Load P2 = 11.25 kN
  • 18. Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 18 L WDL P1 ( KN) P1 WDL= 35.075 kN/m P1= 5.63 kN P2= 11.25 kN L= 18.50 m Shear Forces and Bending Moments due to Dead Loads on Exterior Girder VDL(x)= P1/2+W(L/2-X) MDL(x)= P2X/2+WX/2(L-X) x (m) VDL (kN) MDL (kNm) 0.00 330.07 0.00
  • 19. Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 19 0.925 297.62 295.51 1.850 265.18 561.01 2.775 232.74 796.50 3.700 200.29 1001.98 4.625 167.85 1177.45 5.550 135.40 1322.90 6.475 102.96 1438.35 7.400 70.51 1523.78 8.325 38.07 1579.20 9.250 5.63 1604.61 b) Interior Girder
  • 20. Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 20 Uniform dead loads per linear meter span (kN/m) Top slab = 11.00 tts=thickness of girder = bw*(D-tts)*25 = 12.00 top slab Wearing surface = 4.95 sum WDL = 27.95 kN/m Diaphragms: Conc. Load P1 = 11.25 kN L WDL P1 ( KN) P1 WDL= 27.95 kN/m P1= 11.25 kN P2= 11.25 kN L= 18.50 m
  • 21. Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 21 Shear Forces and Bending Moments due to Dead Loads on Interior Girder VDL(x)= P1/2+W(L/2-X) MDL(x)= P2X/2+WX/2(L-X) x (m) VDL (kN) MDL (kNm) 0.00 330.07 0.00 0.925 297.62 295.51 1.850 265.18 561.01 2.775 232.74 796.50 3.700 200.29 1001.98 4.625 167.85 1177.45 5.550 135.40 1322.90 6.475 102.96 1438.35 7.400 70.51 1523.78 8.325 38.07 1579.20 9.250 5.63 1604.61
  • 22. Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 22 6.1.2 Live Loads P/4 P P (4.3m - 9.0m) (4.3m) P=wheel load =72.5KN LONGITUDNAL ARRANGEMENT P P (1.8m) TRANSVERSE ARRANGEMENT P P (1.8m) TRANSVERSE ARRANGEMENT P P (1.2m) LONGITUDNAL ARRANGEMENT P=wheel load =1/2*110KN=55KN a) Design Truck Load : HL-93 b) Design Tandem The design lane load shall consist of a load of 9.3kN/m, uniformly distributed in the longitudinal direction. Transversely, the design lane load shall be assumed to be uniformly distributed over 3m width. Lane load for exterior girder 4.495 kN/m Load width=1.45 Ra=Rb= 41.58 kN Lane load for interior girder 6.82 kN/m Load width=2.2 Ra=Rb= 63.09 kN
  • 23. Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 23 6.1.2.1 Dynamic Load Allowance Section 3.13, the vehicular dynamic load allowance IM IM = 33% The live loads shall be factored by 1+IM/100 = 1.33 6.1.2.2 Transverse Load Distribution In designing sidewalks, slabs and supporting members, a wheel load should be located one foot from the face of the barrier For the design of components other than the deck overhang, the design truck or tandem shall be positioned transversely such tha load is not closer than 600mm from the edge of the design lane. (Art 3.6.1.3.1 - AASHTO 2004 ) Distribution Factor for Shear (Sec. 13.4: Table 13-7 & 13-8) Exterior Girder: Case-1: One Design lane loaded The lever rule is applied assuming that the slab is simply supported over the longitudinal beams (Table 13-8)
  • 24. Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 24 The distribution coefficient to the exterior girder for shear REX1 (shear)= if (C<(0.8+0.6), P/a*[(a - d1)+(d2)],P/a*[(1.8-(C-(0.8+0.6))-(C-(0.8+0.6))]) = 0.95 P
  • 25. Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 25 Case-2: Two or more design lanes loaded The distribution of live load per lane for shear in exterior girder is determined according to the formulas given in Table 13-8. REX2 (shear) = (0.6+de/3000)*Rin shear = 0.692 per lane de= 0.900 This factor is for one wheel load, for axle load which is equivalent to two lines of wheels should be multiplied by 2 Ok REX2 (shear) = (0.64+de/3800)*Rin shear = 1.384 P Ok Therefore, REX (shear) in exterior girder is maximum of the above two values, REX1 or REX2 REX (shear) = 1.384 P Interior Girder: Case-1: One Design lane loaded The distribution of live load per lane for shear in interior girder is determined according to the formulas given in Table 13-7. RINT 1 (shear) = (0.36+S/7600) = 0.649 per lane where 1100<=S<=4900 6000<=L<=73000 890<=d<=2800 For two lines of wheels (axle load) Nb>=4 ok RINT 1 (shear) = 1.299 P S= de= distance from outside face of exterior girder to interior edge of curb or traffic barrier. It is positive if the exterior web is inboard of the curb and negative if it is outboard de=C-bw/2-0.4
  • 26. Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 26 L=SPAN LENGTH d=over all depth of a girder S is the girder spacing Nc is the number of cells Case-2: Two or more design lanes are loaded The distribution of live load per lane for shear in interior girder RINT 1 (shear) = 0.2+S/3600-[S/10700]^2 = For two lines of wheels (axle load) RINT 2 (shear) = Therefore, RINT (shear), in interior girder is maximum of the above two values, RINT 1 or RINT 2 RINT (shear) = Distribution Factor for moment (Sec.13.4: Table 13-3 and 13-4) Exterior Girder Case-1: One Design lane loaded The distribution of live load per lane for moment in exterior girder (Use Lever Rule) (Table 4.6.2.2.2d-1 Distribution of Live Loads Per Lane for Moment in Exterior Longitudinal Beams.) REXT1 (moment)= if (C<(0.8+0.6), P/a*[(a-d1)+(d2 )],P/a*[(1.8-(C-(0.8+0.6))-(C-(0.8+0.6))]) = 1.045 P S=2.2 Case-2: Two or more design lanes loaded de= 0.9
  • 27. Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 27 REXT2 (moment) = (0.77+de/2800) = 1.091 P The distribution factor for wheel load (i.e. two lines of wheels) is 2 times the maximum of the above two values Rext (moment)= 2.183 P Interior Girder Case-1: One Design lane loaded The distribution factor of live load per lane for moment in interior girder: RINT1(moment) =0.06+(S/4300)^0.4*(S/L)^0.3*(Kg/Lts^3)^0.1 Case-2: Two or more design lanes loaded RINT2(moment) =0.075+(S/4300)^0.64*(S/L)^0.2*(Kg/Lts^3)^0.1 0.512 The distribution factor for wheel load (i.e. two lines of wheels) is 2 times the maximum of the above two values RINT (moment) = 1.024 P 6.1.2.3 Shear Forces and Bending Moments due to Live Loads a) Influence Lines for Shear Forces and Bending Moments a-1) Design Truck: HL-93
  • 28. Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 28 Influence Lines for Shear Force at "x" distance from end support Influence Lines for Bending Moment at "x" distance from end support
  • 29. Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 29
  • 30. Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 30 a-2) Design Tandem Influence Lines for Shear Force at 'x' distance from end support
  • 31. Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 31 Influence Lines for Bending Moments at 'X' distance from end support b) Shear forces due to Live load plus impact b-1) Exterior Girder Design Truck: VLL + IM = (1.00+IM )*(Dist. Factor)*(Ptruck)* (A+B+C/4) IM = 33% Design Tandem: VLL + IM = (1.00+IM )*(Dist. Factor)*(Ptandem)*(A+B+C) L = 18.50 Dist. Factor = 1.38 P truck= 72.50 P tandem= 55.00
  • 32. Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 32 x (m) Live Load 1: Design Truck Coefficients VLL+IM A B C D E F 0 1.000 0.768 0.535 - - - 253.72 0.925 0.950 0.718 0.485 - - - 238.71 1.85 0.900 0.668 0.435 - - - 223.70 2.775 0.850 0.618 0.385 - - - 208.69 3.7 0.800 0.568 0.335 - - - 193.67 4.625 0.750 0.518 0.285 - - - 178.66 5.55 0.700 0.468 0.235 - - - 163.65 6.475 0.650 0.418 0.185 - - - 148.64 7.4 0.600 0.368 0.135 - - - 133.62 8.325 0.550 0.318 0.085 - - - 118.61 9.25 0.500 0.268 0.035 - - - 103.60
  • 33. Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 33 Live Load 2: Design Tandem VLL+I (MAX) Coefficients VLL+IM A B C D (kN) 1.000 0.935 0.124 0.059 214.50 253.72 0.950 0.885 0.074 0.009 194.26 238.71 0.900 0.835 0.024 - 178.11 223.70 0.850 0.785 - - 165.53 208.69 0.800 0.735 - - 155.41 193.67 0.750 0.685 - - 145.28 178.66 0.700 0.635 - - 135.16 163.65 0.650 0.585 - - 125.04 148.64 0.600 0.535 - - 114.91 133.62 0.550 0.485 - - 104.79 118.61 0.500 0.435 - - 94.67 103.60
  • 34. Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 34 b-2) Interior Girder Design Truck: VLL + IM = (1.00+IM )*(Dist. Factor)*(Ptruck)* (A+B+C/4) IM = 33% Design Tandem: VLL + IM = (1.00+IM )*(Dist. Factor)*(Ptandem)*(A+B) L = 18.50m Dist. Factor = 1.538 P truck= 72.50kN P tandem= 55.00 kN x (m) Live Load 1: Design Truck Coefficients VLL+IM A B C D E F (kN) 0 1.000 0.768 0.535 - - - 281.91 0.925 0.950 0.718 0.485 - - - 265.23 1.85 0.900 0.668 0.435 - - - 248.55 2.775 0.850 0.618 0.385 - - - 231.87 3.7 0.800 0.568 0.335 - - - 215.19 4.625 0.750 0.518 0.285 - - - 198.51 5.55 0.700 0.468 0.235 - - - 181.83 6.475 0.650 0.418 0.185 - - - 165.15 7.4 0.600 0.368 0.135 - - - 148.47 8.325 0.550 0.318 0.085 - - - 131.79 9.25 0.500 0.268 0.035 - - - 115.11
  • 35. Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 35 Live Load 2: Design Tandem VLL+I (MAX) Coefficients VLL+IM A B C D (kN) (kN) 1.000 0.935 0.124 0.059 238.34 281.91 0.950 0.885 0.074 0.009 215.84 265.23 0.900 0.835 0.024 - 197.91 248.55 0.850 0.785 - - 183.92 231.87 0.800 0.735 - - 172.67 215.19 0.750 0.685 - - 161.43 198.51 0.700 0.635 - - 150.18 181.83 0.650 0.585 - - 138.93 165.15 0.600 0.535 - - 127.68 148.47 0.550 0.485 - - 116.43 131.79 0.500 0.435 - - 105.18 115.11
  • 36. Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 36 c) Bending Moments due to Live load plus impact c-1) Exterior Girder Design Truck: VLL + IM = (1.00+IM )*(Dist. Factor)*(Ptruck)* Max(Sum Coeff's) IM = 33% Design Tandem: VLL + IM = (1.00+IM )*(Dist. Factor)*(Ptandem)*(A+B) L = 18.5 m Dist. Factor =2.18 P truck=72.5 kN P tandem=55.0 kN Design Truck Load Case 1 x Coef. ( Loading 1 ) sum Coef. (m) A B C/4 D E F/4 A+B+C/4+D+E+F/4 0 - - - - - - - 0.925 0.88 0.66 0.11 - - - 1.65 1.85 1.67 1.24 0.20 - - - 3.10 2.775 2.36 1.71 0.27 - - - 4.34 3.7 2.96 2.10 0.31 - - - 5.37 4.625 3.47 2.39 0.33 - - - 6.19 5.55 3.89 2.60 0.33 - - - 6.81 6.475 4.21 2.70 0.30 - - - 7.21 7.4 4.44 2.72 0.25 - - - 7.41 8.325 4.58 2.64 0.18 - - - 7.40
  • 37. Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 37 9.25 4.63 2.48 0.08 - - - 7.18 Design Truck Load Case 2 Coeff. ( Loading 2 ) sum Coef. Maximum MLL+IM A B C/4 D E F/4 A+B+C/4+D+E+F/4 (kNm/m) - - - - - - - - - 0.88 0.166 - - - 1.045 348.28 - 1.67 0.309 - - - 1.974 652.76 - 2.36 0.428 - - - 2.787 913.43 - 2.96 0.525 - - - 3.485 1130.29 0.24 3.47 0.598 - - - 4.311 1303.34 0.88 3.89 0.649 - - - 5.409 1432.59 1.41 4.21 0.676 - - - 6.298 1518.04 1.86 4.44 0.680 - - - 6.980 1559.67 2.21 4.58 0.661 - - - 7.453 1568.81 2.48 4.63 0.619 - - - 7.719 1624.66
  • 38. Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 38 When the live load is Design Tandem Design Tandem Load x Coefficients sum Coef. MLL+IM (m) A B C D ( A + B + C ) (kNm/m) 0.000 - - - - - - 0.925 0.88 0.82 0.07 0.01 1.775 283.42 1.850 1.67 1.55 0.04 - 3.255 519.75 2.775 2.36 2.18 - - 4.538 724.53 3.700 2.96 2.72 - - 5.680 906.96 4.625 3.47 3.17 - - 6.638 1059.85 5.550 3.89 3.53 - - 7.410 1183.20 6.475 4.21 3.79 - - 7.998 1277.01 7.400 4.44 3.96 - - 8.400 1341.28 8.325 4.58 4.04 - - 8.618 1376.01 9.250 4.63 4.03 - - 8.650 1381.20 c-2) Interior Girder Design Truck: VLL + IM = (1.00+IM )*(Dist. Factor)*(Ptruck)* Max(Sum Coeff's) IM = 33%
  • 39. Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 39 Design Tandem: VLL + IM = (1.00+IM )*(Dist. Factor)*(Ptandem)*(A+B) L = 18.50 Dist. Factor =1.024 P truck=72.50 P tandem=55.00 When the live load is Design Truck Design Truck Load Case 1 x Coef. ( Loading 1 ) sum Coef. (m) A B C/4 D E F/4 A+B+C/4+D+E+F/4 0 - - - - - - - 0.925 0.88 0.66 0.11 - - - 1.65 1.85 1.67 1.24 0.20 - - - 3.10 2.775 2.36 1.71 0.27 - - - 4.34 3.7 2.96 2.10 0.31 - - - 5.37 4.625 3.47 2.39 0.33 - - - 6.19 5.55 3.89 2.60 0.33 - - - 6.81 6.475 4.21 2.70 0.30 - - - 7.21 7.4 4.44 2.72 0.25 - - - 7.41 8.325 4.58 2.64 0.18 - - - 7.40 9.25 4.63 2.48 0.08 - - - 7.18
  • 40. Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 40 Design Truck Load Case 2 Coef. ( Loading 2 ) Sum Coef. Maximum,MLL+IM A B C/4 D E F/4 A+B+C/4+D+E+F/4 (kNm/m) - - - - - - - - - 0.88 0.166 - - - 1.045 163.364 - 1.67 0.309 - - - 1.974 306.180 - 2.36 0.428 - - - 2.787 428.448 - 2.96 0.525 - - - 3.485 530.168 0.24 3.47 0.598 - - - 4.311 611.341 0.88 3.89 0.649 - - - 5.409 671.966 1.41 4.21 0.676 - - - 6.298 712.043 1.86 4.44 0.680 - - - 6.980 731.573 2.21 4.58 0.661 - - - 7.453 735.862 2.48 4.63 0.619 - - - 7.719 762.055
  • 41. Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 41 When the live load is Design Tandem Design Tandem Load Maximum, MLL+IM x Coefficients Sum Coef. (m) A B C D ( A + B + C+D ) 0 - - - - - - 0.925 0.88 0.82 0.07 0.01 1.78 132.94 1.85 1.67 1.55 0.04 - 3.26 243.79 2.775 2.36 2.18 - - 4.54 339.84 3.7 2.96 2.72 - - 5.68 425.41 4.625 3.47 3.17 - - 6.64 497.13 5.55 3.89 3.53 - - 7.41 554.99 6.475 4.21 3.79 - - 8.00 598.99 7.4 4.44 3.96 - - 8.40 629.13 8.325 4.58 4.04 - - 8.62 645.42 9.25 4.63 4.03 - - 8.65 647.86 6.1.3 Seismic Force Effects
  • 42. Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 42 Earthquake zones: EBCS Zone -4 Site Coefficient: Type I = 1.5 Acceleration coefficient(A): = The horizontal seismic force is the product of the site coefficient, the acceleration coefficient and the permanent load Computation of permanent loads: Railing and posts = 131.81 kN Sidewalks = 869.50 kN Top Slab = 638.25 kN Girders= 777.00 kN Diaphrams= 135.00 kN Asphalt = 303.86 kN Sum Wp = 2855.43 kN Horizontal earhquake force FH = site coeff.*A* Wp = 428.31 This force is transferred to the substructure through the bearings located at ends of the bridge Earthquake force transferred to one support = 1/2*FH = 214.16 This force is applied horizontally to the bearings Total Dead Load reaction at one support = 1427.71 Assume coef. of friction between bearing and concrete seat at abut, µ= 0.50 The frictional resistance force developed between the interface = µ*Dead load Rxn = 713.86 So Earthquake effects are negligible!!
  • 43. Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 43 6.1.4 FACTORED LOADS Load Factors and Load Combinations The load factors and load combinations are according to ERA's Bridge Design Manual 2002, section 3.3 The load combination to be used for design is Strenght - I Limit state, Table 3-1. Factored Load = gb *DL + 1.75* ( LL + IM ) = 1.25*DL+1.75*(LL+IM) gb =1.25 Factored Shear Forces
  • 44. Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 44 x Exterior Girder Interior Girder Design S.F. VDL Vlane VLL+I 1.25VDL+ 1.75VLL+IM+ 1.75Vlane VDL Vlane VLL+I 1.25VDL+ 1.75VLL+IM+ 1.75Vlane Vmax (m) (kN) (kN) (kN) (kN) (kN) (kN) (kN) (kN) (kN) 0.00 330.07 41.58 253.72 929.36 330.07 63.09 281.9 1016.33 1016.33 0.925 297.62 37.42 238.71 855.26 297.62 56.78 265.2 935.55 935.55 1.85 265.18 33.26 223.70 781.16 265.18 50.47 248.6 854.76 854.76 2.775 232.74 29.11 208.69 707.05 232.74 44.16 231.9 773.98 773.98 3.7 200.29 24.95 193.67 632.95 200.29 37.85 215.2 693.19 693.19 4.63 167.85 20.79 178.66 558.85 167.85 31.54 198.5 612.40 612.40 5.55 135.40 16.63 163.65 484.74 135.40 25.23 181.8 531.62 531.62 6.475 102.96 12.47 148.64 410.64 102.96 18.93 165.2 450.83 450.83 7.4 70.51 8.32 133.62 336.54 70.51 12.62 148.5 370.05 370.05 8.325 38.07 4.16 118.61 262.43 38.07 6.31 131.8 289.26 289.26 9.25 5.63 0.00 103.60 188.33 5.63 0.00 115.1 208.47 208.47 Factored Bending Moments
  • 45. Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 45 Exterior Girder Interior Girder Design B.M. x MDL Mlane MLL+IM 1.25MDL+ 1.75MLL+IM+ 1.75Mlane MDL Mlane MLL+IM 1.25MDL+ 1.75MLL+IM+ 1.75Mlane Mmax (m) (kNm) (kNm) (kNm) (kNm) (kNm) (kNm) (kNm) (kNm) (kNm) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.925 295.51 36.54 348.28 1042.82 295.51 55.44 163.4 752.29 1042.82 1.85 561.01 69.23 652.76 1964.74 561.01 105.04 306.2 1420.89 1964.74 2.775 796.50 98.07 913.43 2765.75 796.50 148.80 428.4 2005.81 2765.75 3.7 1001.98 123.07 1130.29 3445.86 1001.98 186.73 530.2 2507.05 3445.86 4.625 1177.45 144.23 1303.34 4005.05 1177.45 218.83 611.3 2924.60 4005.05 5.55 1322.90 161.53 1432.59 4443.35 1322.90 245.09 672.0 3258.47 4443.35 6.475 1438.35 174.99 1518.04 4760.74 1438.35 265.51 712.0 3508.65 4760.74 7.4 1523.78 184.61 1559.67 4957.22 1523.78 280.10 731.6 3675.15 4957.22 8.325 1579.20 190.38 1568.81 5052.59 1579.20 288.85 735.9 3767.25 5052.59 9.25 1604.61 192.30 1381.20 4759.39 1604.61 291.77 762.1 3849.96 4759.39 6.2. DESIGN FOR FLEXURE a) Design Loads The factored loads in the above tables are the design loads and the structure shall be designed to carry the expected design loads as calculated above
  • 46. Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 46 b) Effective Compression Flange Width, beff, ( AASHTO Art. 4.6.2.6.1) Exterior Girder For exterior beams, the effective flange width may be taken as one-half the effective width of the adjacent interior beam, plus the least of: a. 1/8 effective span length = 2.31m L = 18.5 m b. 6 times the average thickness of the slab, plus the greater of half the web thickness or one-quarter of the width of the top flange of the basic girder = 1.75m hf=200 mm c. The width of the overhang = 1.00m Bw=400 mm beff < 1/2*Effective width of interior girder + minimum value of = 2.10m Overhand =1.0 m Clear girder spac. = 1.8 m
  • 47. Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 47 Interior Girder The effective compression flange width, beff, is the minimum of the following: a. 1/4 span = 4.63 m b. 12 times the average thickness of the slab, plus the greater of web thickness or one-half of the width of the top flange of the girder = 2.80 c. The average spacing of the adjacent beam = 2.20 Effective compression flange width, beff = 2.20 Use compression flange width, beff = 2.10 c) Spacing Limits for Reinforcements ( AASHTO 2004 - Art. 5.10.3.1.1) Horizontal In cast-in-place concrete, the clear distance between parallel bars in a layer shall not be less than: 1.5 times bar diameter = 48 mm Assume d=32 1.5 times the max. size of coarse aggregate (i.e.25.4mm) = = 38 mm 38mm = 38 mm Hence the minimum clear distance between parallel bars in a layer with no lapping is = 48 mm =
  • 48. Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 48 Assuming vertical lapping of bars, one over the other, The minimum clear distance between parallel bars in a layer is = 48 mm Therefore, the minimum center to center spacing of bars in a layer is = 80 mm Use center to center spacing of bars in a layer = 80 mm Therefore, the minimum center to center spacing of bars in a layer with overlap is = 112 mm Use center to center spacing of bars in a layer = 120 mm Vertical Minimum clear distance between two layers of bars is 1 inch or dia of bar = 32 mm Thus, minimum center to center spacing of bars when there is lap = 96 mm Use vertical center to center spacing of bars b/n layers = 100 mm d) Section Capacity and Reinforcement The maximum design moment is: Mmax = 5,052.59 kNm Cover(mm)= 40 Try No of bars ф of bars ai di(m) ai*di G0 1st row = 4 32 3217 0.072 232 G1 2nd row = 4 32 3217 0.080 257 G2 3rd row = 4 32 3217 0.088 283 G3 4th row = 4 32 3217 0.096 309 16 12868 1081 D = 1.400 m
  • 49. Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 49 d' = sum ai*di = 0.084 m sum ai d = D - d' = 1.316 m b = 2.100 m Assume rectangular beam analysis As= 12,868 mm2 b = 2.100 m d = 1.316 m fy = 400.0 MPa fc' = 24.00 Mpa bw = 0.400 m hf = 0.20 m Ø = 0.90 m r= As/bd = 0.00466 a = As*fy/(0.85*fc'*b) 120.15 mm It is rectangular beam as assumed ØMn =Ø*As*fy*(d-a/2) 5,818.03 kNm The following computations for T-beam analysis do not apply Asf = 0.85*fc'*(b-bw)*hf/fy = - mm2 M1=Asf*fy*(d-hf/2) = - kNm
  • 50. Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 50 a = (As - Asf)*fy/(0.85*fc'*bw) = - mm M2 =(As - Asf)*fy*(d-a/2) = - kNm Mu = M1 + M2 = - kNm ØMu = Ø ( M1 + M2 ) = - kNm Therefore, the section capacity is ØMn = 5818.03 kN-m >> Mmax = 5,05,59 kN - m e) Checking maximum steel area rf = Asf/b'wd = 0.00211 b' bot-flange reinf.dist- width = 2.10 m rmax = 0.75*rb = 0.75*0.85*b1*(fc'/fy)*(600/(600+fy)+rf) b1=0.85 = 0.0195 fc' = 24 MPa rprovided = (As-Asf)/bwd = 0.0047 << rmax fy =400 MPa OK !! f) Check for minimum reinforcement (ERA BDM Section 9.4.5) i. The minimum reinforcement criteria: - AASHTO 2004, Art. 5.7.3.3.2 ØMn > = minimum of 1.2Mcr. or 1.33 Mu
  • 51. Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 51 ØMn > = 1.2Mcr. btop= 2.10 m hf= 0.20 m bw= 0.40 m D= 1.40 m hbot= 0.15 m bbot= 2.10 m length accommodating the reinforcement is taken Mcr = fr * Ig / yt fr = 0.63 * SQRT( fc' ) = 3.086 N/mm2 Centroid of cross section y1=Sum(Ai*yi)/(sumAi) = Sum Ai*yi = 0.853 m3 Sum Ai = 1.155 m2 Yt=Sum(Ai*yi)/(sumAi) = 0.739 m Gross moment of inertia, Ig, about centroid I1=1/12*btop*hf 3 + A1*d1 2 = 0.1338 m4 I2=1/12*bw*(D - hf -hbot)3 + A2*d2 2 = 0.0403 m4 I3=1/12*bbot*(hbot )3 + A3*d3 2 = 0.1393 m4 Sum Ig = 0.3134 m4
  • 52. Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 52 The crackimg moment, Mcr, Mcr = fr * Ig / yt = 1,309.37 KNm 1.2Mcr = 1,571.25 KNm Mmax = 5,052.59 KNm >> OK! ii. The minimum reinforcement criteria: - AASHTO 2004, Art. 5.7.3.3.2 rmin = 0.03*fc'/fy = 0.0018 r = As/bd = 0.0244 b= bw = 0.40 OK! g) Serviceability Requirements Fatigue stress limits ( ERA BDM Section 9.6.2 ) or (AASHTO LRFD Art. 5.5.3.2) Fatigue stress limits will be checked for the service load conditions. The permissible stress range is given by Eq. 9.19. ff = 145 - 0.33 fmin + 55 (r/h) k = [rn+0.5(ts/d)2 ] / (rn+(ts/d) = 0.258 k*d = 0.339 m T-beam If it is rectangular beam
  • 53. Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 53 j = 1 - k/3 = - If it is T-beam j = 6 - 6(hf/d)+2(hf/d)2 - (hf/d)3 /(2pn) = 0.935 6 - 3 (hf/d) The minimum stress, fmin , is : (the minimum stress is created when there is no vehicle moving on the brid fmin = MDL/(As*j*d) = 101.39 N/mm2 The maximim stress, fmax, is caused by the total load ( MDL+LL+IM ) (the maximum stress is created when the vehicle is moving on the bridge, i.e., due to the self weight + moving load) fmax = (MDL+LL+IM) /(As*j*d) = 200.51 N/mm2 The actual stress range, delta ff, is: Delta ff = fmax - fmin = 99.12 N/mm2 The fatigue stress limit, ff, is ff = 145 - 0.33* fmin + 55 (r/h) = 128.04 N/mm2 >> OK !! Control of Cracking by Distribution of Reinforcement (Sec. 9.4.5) To control flexural cracking of the concrete, tension reinforcement shall be well distributed within maximum flexural zones. Components shall be so proportioned that the tensile stress in the steel reinforcement at service limit state, fs, does not exceed fsa = Z / (dc*A)1/3 < = 0.6*fy
  • 54. Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 54 A = Effective tension area/ No. of bars=bw*(2y')/N= 0.00420, y’ = d’ = 0.084 m dc = distance measured from extreme tension fiber to center of the closest bar = 0.072; bw = 0.40 Z = crack width parameter, assumed = 30.00 ; No of bars = 16 Therefore, for crack control the maximum allowable stress is fsa = Z / (dc*A)1/3 <=0.6fy = 240.00 fsa = 240 MPa The maximim stress, fmax, at service load is fmax = (MDL+MLL+IM) /(As*j*d) = 200.51 OK h) Bar Cutting Development of Reinforcement (ERA BDM Sec. 9.4.3)or AASHTO, Art. 5.11.1.2.2 Positive moment reinforcement: Atleast one-third of the positive moment reinforcement in simple span members shall extend along the same face of the member beyond the centerline of the support. The basic development length, ldb, in mm is For bars diam. 35 and smaller, ldb = 0.02Ab*fy/sqrt(fc') >=0.06db*fy db= ldb = 0.02Ab*fy/sqrt(fc') = 1313 mm fy= 400 fc'= 24.0 The tension development length,ld, is 0.06db*fy= 768.0 ld = ldb * modification factor = 1313 mm mod. Factor = 1.00
  • 55. Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 55 Modification factor 2 taken to account for clear spacing between bars Lap splices of Reinforcement in Tension The length of lap for tension lap splices shall not be less than either 300mm or the 1.3 times the development length Lap splices for diam. 32 bar = 1,707 mm Flexural Reinforcement Extension Length (Sec. 9.4.5) Except at supports of simple spans and at the free ends of cantilevers, reinforcement shall be extended beyond the point at which it is no longer required to resist flexure for a distance not less than: a) the effective depth of the member = 1.32 m b) 15 times the nominal diameter of bar = 0.48 m c) 1/20 of the clear span = 0.90 m Therefore, extension length is max. of the above values and development length ld = 1.32 m x (m) Mx (KNm) 4Æ32 8Æ32 12Æ32 16Æ32 0Æ32 0.00 0.000 1520.59 2997.12 4415.70 5780.97 0.00 0.93 1042.82 1520.59 2997.12 4415.70 5780.97 0.00
  • 56. Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 56 1.85 1964.74 1520.59 2997.12 4415.70 5780.97 0.00 2.78 2765.75 1520.59 2997.12 4415.70 5780.97 0.00 3.70 3445.86 1520.59 2997.12 4415.70 5780.97 0.00 4.63 4005.05 1520.59 2997.12 4415.70 5780.97 0.00 5.55 4443.35 1520.59 2997.12 4415.70 5780.97 0.00 6.48 4760.74 1520.59 2997.12 4415.70 5780.97 0.00 7.40 4957.22 1520.59 2997.12 4415.70 5780.97 0.00 8.33 5052.59 1520.59 2997.12 4415.70 5780.97 0.00 9.25 4759.39 1520.59 2997.12 4415.70 5780.97 0.00
  • 57. Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 57 D = 1.40 m beff= 2.10 m bw= 0.40 m bw'= 2.10 m hf= 0.20 m f= 0.90 fy= 400 Mpa f'c= 24 Mpa n(no.of bottom bar) 4
  • 58. Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 58 dc= 72 mm Rectangular Analysis T Beam Analysis fM= fAs*fy(d-a/2) Asf=.85*f'c*(beff-bw)*hf/fy a=(As-Asf)fy/(.85*f'c*bw) M1=Asf*fy(d-hf/2) M2=(As-Asf)fy*(d-a/2) fM= f(M1+M2) No. of bars Total No. of bars Diam.(mm) As(mm2) y bar(mm) d=D- ybar(mm) r = As/bd a=As*fy/ (.85*f'cbef f) R or T fMr 4 4 32 3217 72 1328.00 0.001 30.037 R 1520.59 4 8 32 6434 80 1324.00 0.002 60.075 R 2997.12 4 12 32 9651 88 1316.00 0.003 90.112 R 4415.70 4 16 32 12868 96 1308.00 0.005 120.149 R 5780.97 x (m) Mx (KNm)
  • 59. Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 59 0.00 0.000 0.925 1042.823 1.850 1964.740 2.775 2765.751 3.700 3445.856 4.625 4005.055 5.550 4443.348 6.475 4760.736 7.400 4957.218 8.325 5052.592 9.25 4759.392 covered dis Type No. of bars R or T Resisting Moment x for moment From to length of bar G0 4 R 1,520.59 1.502 0 1.502 18.9 G1 4 R 2,997.12 3.28 1.502 3.28 15.50 G2 4 R 4,415.70 5.754 3.28 5.754 11.94 G3 4 R 5,780.97 10.25 3.28 10.25 11.94
  • 60. Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 60 a = 1/2*circumf.+4*db = 630mm e = 4*db = 4*32mm = 128mm d a d = 10*db =320mm Standard Hook Detail e Standard hook length = 0.63 M 4db = 128 mm 5db = 160 mm
  • 61. Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 61 length= Length of Flexural Reinforcement bars resistance length total length The bar start at x= d Bar- G0 = 14* Diam. 32 bars 1520.59 9.24 19.74 m 0.050 1.328 Bar- G1 =4*diam.32 bars 2997.12 7.75 18.13 m 0.136 1.324 Bar- G2 =4*diam.32 bars 4415.70 5.97 14.57 m 1.914 1.324 Bar- G3 = 4*diam.32 bars 5780.97 5.97 14.57 m 1.914 1.324 Bar- G4 =4*diam.32 bars 0.00 0.00 2.63 m 7.884 1.324 i ) Skin Reinforcement If the effective depth, de, of reinforced concrete member exceeds 900mm, longitudinal skin reinforcement shall be uniformly distributed along both side faces of the member for a distance d/2 nearest the flexural tension reinforcement. The area of skin reinforcement, Ask, in mm2/m of height on each side face shall not be less than Ask > = 0.001*(de - 760) <= As/1200 Effective depth de = D - d' = 1050 mm > 900mm Therefore, Skin Reinf. shall be provided! Ask > = 0.001*(de - 760) = 290 mm2/m d = 1.322 Spacing = as/As * 1000 = 690 mm diam. = 16 Maximum spacing, Smax, lesser of d/6 or 300mm = 220 mm Use diam. 16 mm bars c/c 200 mm G4
  • 62. Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 62 6.3 DESIGN FOR SHEAR Shear strength Design of cross sections subject to shear shall be based on Vu < = ØVn = Ø (Vc + Vs ) Ø = 0.900 where Vu = factored shear forces at the section Vn = the nominal shear strength, determined as the lesser of Vn = Vc + Vs or Vn=0.25*fc'*bv*dv Vc = the nominal shear strength provided by the concrete, determined by: Vc = 0.083*b*SQRT(fc')*bv*dv, where b= 2.00 Vs = the nominal shear strength provided by the shear reinforcement Vs = Av*fv*d / s Shear strength provided by concrete Shear stress provided by concrete vc = 0.083*b*sqrt(fc') = 0.813 (MPa ) The shear strength carried by concrete,Vc=vc*bw*d= 0.813 *bw*d (N) Shear strength provided by shear reinforcement Where the factored shear force, Vu, exceeds shear strength ØVc, shear reinforcement shall be provided to satisfy the equation, Vu < = ØVn = Ø ( Vc + Vs ) When shear reinforcement perpendicular to the axis of the member is used Vs = Vu/Ø - Vc = Av*fy*d / s There fore, spacing of shear reinforcement, s, is : S = Av*fy*d / Vs = Av*fy*d/(Vu/Ø-Vc)=Av*fy*d/(Vu/Ø - 0.813*bw*d ) Minimum shear reinforcement ( Eq.12.34 ) Av = 0.083*sqrt(fc')*bw*S / fy fc' = 24MPa
  • 63. Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 63 Smax = Av*fy / ( 0.083*sqrt(fc')*bw ) fy = 300MPa Maximum spacing of shear reinforcement Av =diam.12= 226mm2 If Vu < 0.10*fc' * bw * d, S <= 0.8d <= 600mm 0.10*fc' * bw= 960N If Vu >= 0.10*fc' * bw * d, S <= 0.4d <= 300mm Sections located less than a distance 'd' from support may be designed for the same shear as that computed at a distance d x (m) Vx (KN) 0.00 1016.33 0.93 935.55 1.85 854.76 2.78 773.98 3.70 693.19 4.63 612.40 5.55 531.62 6.48 450.83 7.40 370.05 8.33 289.26 9.25 208.47
  • 64. Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 64 Shear reinforcement x(m) Vu(KN) dv(m) Vc(KN) Vs(KN) 0.1*f'c*bw* dv (KN) Smax1 (mm) Smax2 (mm) Scal.(mm) Sprov. (mm) Actual/Recomm ended Spacing (mm) 0.00 1016.33 1.328 431.988 697.27 1274.88 600 417 129 129 80 0.93 935.55 2.394 778.750 260.75 2298.24 600 417 623 417 300 1.85 854.76 2.394 778.750 170.99 2298.24 600 417 950 417 300 2.78 773.98 2.394 778.750 81.22 2298.24 600 417 2000 417 300 3.70 693.19 2.369 770.617 0.00 2274.24 600 417 0 417 300 4.63 612.40 2.369 770.617 0.00 2274.24 600 417 0 417 300 5.55 531.62 2.369 770.617 0.00 2274.24 600 417 0 417 300 6.48 450.83 2.369 770.617 0.00 2274.24 600 417 0 417 300 7.40 370.05 2.344 762.485 0.00 2250.24 600 417 0 417 300 8.33 289.26 2.344 762.485 0.00 2250.2 600 417 0 417 300 9.25 208.47 2.344 762.485 0.00 2250.2 600 417 0 417 300 G5 6.4 DEFLECTION (Serviceabilty Requirement (AASHTO-Art. 5.7.3.6.2))
  • 65. Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 65 6.4.1 Computation of Gross Moment of Inertia A) Centroid of cross section For simplicity of calculations, the slab surface is assumed level, i.e., without crossfall. The center of gravity is calculated from bottom of girder Part Area, Ai (m2) Centroid, yi (m) Ai*yi (m3) Centroid of area Top Slab 1.80 1.30 2.340 y1=sum Ai*yi/(sum Ai)= 1.00 Bottom slab Girder 1.68 0.68 1.134 Sum 3.48 3.47 B) Gross moment of Inertia Part Area, Ai (m2) yi (m) ycg = yi-y1 (m) Ig (m4) Ai*(ycg)2 (m3) Ig+Ai*(ycg)2 (m4) Top Slab 1.80 1.30 0.30 0.006000 0.164 0.1699 Bottom slab Girder 1.68 0.68 0.32 0.154350 0.176 0.3299 Sum Ig = 0.4998 m4 C) Computation of Effective Moment of Inertia
  • 66. Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 66 Ie = [ Mcr/Ma ]3 *Ig + [ 1 - (Mcr/Ma)3 ] Icr < = Ig Mcr = cracking moment (N-mm) fr = 0.63*sqrt(fc') = 3.09 N/mm2 fr = modulus of rupture of concrete as specified in Mcr = fr*Ig / yt = 1545.19 kNm Article 5.4.2.6 (MPa) yt = distance from the neutral axis to the extreme D) Weight of superstructure tension fiber (mm) Part W (KN) W (KN/m) Ma = maximum moment in a component at the stage Top Slab 855.00 45.00 for which deformation is computed (N-mm) Bottom Slab Girder 798.00 42.00 Cross Girder 19.13 1.01 Sum W (KN/m) 88.01 Ma(Total Slab) = W*L2 /8 = 3,971 Ma = W*L2 /8 = MDl ext. = W*L2 /8 = 6418.459 Ma = 6418.459 KNM E) Transformed section
  • 67. Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 67 fc T jd c C fs kd d nAs kd d beff bw k*d = 0.339 m (previous calculation) beff= 8.40 m bw= 1.60 m n= 8 As= 51,472 mm2 d= 1.316 m d'= 0.084 m D= 1.400 m hf= 0.200 m
  • 68. Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 68 j= 0.935 m Centroid of cross section ( y1 measured from bottom) Part Area, Ai (m2) yi (m) Ai*yi (m3) Top Slab 1.80 1.30 2.34 y1=sum Ai*yi/(sum Ai)= 0.77 0.0000 Girder 6.72 0.68 4.536 Transformed steel, nAs 0.41 0.08 0.035 Sum 8.93 6.91 Computation of Moment of Inertia of Cracked section, Icr Part Area, Ai (m2) ycg = yi-y1 (m) Icg (m4) Ai*(ycg)2 (m3) Ig+Ai*(ycg)2 (m4) Slab 1.80 0.5263 0.004867 0.4986 0.5034 Girder 6.72 0.0987 0.154350 0.0655 0.2198 Transformed steel, nAs 0.41 0.6897 - 0.1959 0.1959 Sum = 0.9191 m4 Effective moment of Inertia, Ie
  • 69. Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 69 Ie = [ Mcr / Ma]3 * Ig + [ 1 - (Mcr/Ma)3 ] Icr = 0.9133 m4 <= Ig = 0.50 Ie= 0.500 Computation of Dead Load Deflection using effective moment of Inertia, Ie. i. Instantaneous deflection The maximum deflection is calculated by using the formula; Deflection, max. = 5*W*L4 /(384*E*Ie) = 18.5mm E = Ec=24,768 MPa ii. Long term deflection W =150.03 kN/m Long term deflection = Instantaneous deflection * factor L=18.5 m The factor is : If the instantaneous deflection is based on Ig : = 3 If the instantaneous deflection is based on Ie :3.00-1.2(As'/As)>=1.6 2 Therefore, the Long term deflection = 55 mm Provide camber 60 mm at mid span of the bridge Calculation of live load deflection using the effective moment of inertia The live load deflection at mid -span for different loading conditions that is analogous to the moving load pattern is given as follows:
  • 70. Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 70 P P P P/4 - When investigating the maximum absolute deflection, all design lanes should be loaded; and all supporting components should be assumed to deflect equally. - The live load portion of load combination Service I of Table 3-3( i.e, load factors for both live and dead load equal to 1.0) with dynamic load allowance factor should be applied. P with IM = 385.7 kN **two lane loads take n w lane load = 18.6 N/mm def. Lane =5wL4 /(384EIe) = 0.57 mm According to Chapter 3, - The live load deflection should be taken as the larger of :
  • 71. Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 71 * That resulting from the design truck alone, or * That resulting from 25 percent of the design truck together with the design lane load. a x x1 x2 x3 delta 1 (mm) delta 2 (mm) delta 3 (mm) total truck load deflection Maximum deflection (max (truck,0.25*truc k+lane) 0 0.000 9.900 14.20 18.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.57 0.05 0.925 8.975 13.28 17.58 0.61 0.57 0.15 1.33 1.33 0.1 1.850 8.050 12.35 16.65 1.15 1.19 0.53 2.87 2.87 0.15 2.775 7.125 11.43 15.73 1.58 1.82 1.07 4.46 4.46 0.2 3.700 6.200 10.50 14.80 1.87 2.38 1.68 5.93 5.93 0.25 4.625 5.275 9.58 13.88 2.01 2.85 2.31 7.17 7.17 0.3 5.550 4.350 8.65 12.95 1.98 3.19 2.90 8.07 8.07 0.35 6.475 3.425 7.73 12.03 1.80 3.38 3.40 8.58 8.58 0.4 7.400 2.500 6.80 11.10 1.46 3.41 3.79 8.66 8.66 0.45 8.325 1.575 5.88 10.18 1.00 3.27 4.03 8.30 8.30 0.5 9.250 0.650 4.95 9.25 0.43 2.98 4.11 7.53 7.53 Therefore, the maximum live load deflection is the maximum of the tabulated values above. Def. Live load Max = 8.66 mm Allowable Live Load Deflection - AASHTO Art. 2.5.2.6.2 Allowable deflection = Span /800 = 23.13 mm OK !
  • 72. Chapter 5- 18 m span Girder Bridge Fundamentals of Bridge Structures AAiT, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Page 72