This presentation is created by Task Group 4 of the CEN/ISSS Phase II concerning e-invoicing.
This presentation provides a view of the expected deliverables and CWA's of this task group, including the time frame and the format of these deliverables and CWA's.
Emerging Technologies and Business Processes – Anders Grangard & Adrian MuellerDanny Gaethofs
Emerging Technologies and Business Processes
Presentation from Anders Grangard & Adrian Mueller, given on the 4th CEN Conference on e-invoicing from 18 June 2009 in Brussel.
Presentation "PPPs in the EU- Widespread shortcomings and limited benefits" made during the SIGMA workshop on Auditing Public Private Partnerships and Concessions. Ankara, 2-3 May 2018.
Nina Mazgan, evaluator for SME Instrument, at Technology Park Ljubljana, presented the SME Instrument with emphasis on the successful project proposal writing.
APM chairman Steve Wake spoke at the Project Governance and Controls Symposium (PGCS) on 11th and 12th May in Canberra, Australia.
He covered initiatives by the UK Cabinet Office and discussed the status of project management and project governance and controls from an international and British perspective. He highlighted the challenges and direction of the profession within the UK and Europe.
More information visit https://www.apm.org.uk/
Emerging Technologies and Business Processes – Anders Grangard & Adrian MuellerDanny Gaethofs
Emerging Technologies and Business Processes
Presentation from Anders Grangard & Adrian Mueller, given on the 4th CEN Conference on e-invoicing from 18 June 2009 in Brussel.
Presentation "PPPs in the EU- Widespread shortcomings and limited benefits" made during the SIGMA workshop on Auditing Public Private Partnerships and Concessions. Ankara, 2-3 May 2018.
Nina Mazgan, evaluator for SME Instrument, at Technology Park Ljubljana, presented the SME Instrument with emphasis on the successful project proposal writing.
APM chairman Steve Wake spoke at the Project Governance and Controls Symposium (PGCS) on 11th and 12th May in Canberra, Australia.
He covered initiatives by the UK Cabinet Office and discussed the status of project management and project governance and controls from an international and British perspective. He highlighted the challenges and direction of the profession within the UK and Europe.
More information visit https://www.apm.org.uk/
Level up your career with a Post Master's Degree in C-ITS (Connected Vehicles)Caroline HANRAS
You are interested in the high tech field of Connected cars and wish to take your career to the next level? The Post Master's degree may be the right option for you!
EURECOM's Post Master's degree offers the necessary knowledge required by engineers and managers to design connected cars / connected mobility applications and the related mechanisms to understand the innovations and seize the unique opportunities of the booming Vehicular Communications industry.
Brief introduction to EUnetHTA and its toolsEUnetHTA
Brief introduction to EUnetHTA and its Tools, Marianne Klemp, NOKC
Presentation from the 3rd face to face training course for EUnetHTA Stakeholders organised by EUnetHTA JA2 WP2; April 23rd, 2015, Brussels.
The aim of the meeting was to evaluate and discuss the activities carried out so far and to examine the activities to perform before the next meeting, which will take place in Ireland at the end of October. The second IT-Shape meeting, attended by representatives of the 10 project partners, took place on 1st, 2nd and 3rd April 2014 at ITCG E. Fermi in Pontedera. The Pontedera meeting followed the kick-off meeting that took place in November in Budapest (Hungary). Between the two meetings, six months of hard work on the project.
Level up your career with a Post Master's Degree in C-ITS (Connected Vehicles)Caroline HANRAS
You are interested in the high tech field of Connected cars and wish to take your career to the next level? The Post Master's degree may be the right option for you!
EURECOM's Post Master's degree offers the necessary knowledge required by engineers and managers to design connected cars / connected mobility applications and the related mechanisms to understand the innovations and seize the unique opportunities of the booming Vehicular Communications industry.
Brief introduction to EUnetHTA and its toolsEUnetHTA
Brief introduction to EUnetHTA and its Tools, Marianne Klemp, NOKC
Presentation from the 3rd face to face training course for EUnetHTA Stakeholders organised by EUnetHTA JA2 WP2; April 23rd, 2015, Brussels.
The aim of the meeting was to evaluate and discuss the activities carried out so far and to examine the activities to perform before the next meeting, which will take place in Ireland at the end of October. The second IT-Shape meeting, attended by representatives of the 10 project partners, took place on 1st, 2nd and 3rd April 2014 at ITCG E. Fermi in Pontedera. The Pontedera meeting followed the kick-off meeting that took place in November in Budapest (Hungary). Between the two meetings, six months of hard work on the project.
The CEN/ eInvoicing 2 Workshop presents the following draft CWAs for public review
- CWA2c-Monitoring_legal_requirements_for_cross_border_e-Invoicing.pdf
- CWA1 Adoption programme for increased eInvoicing in European business processes
- CWA2a e-Invoicing Compliance Guidelines Commentary
- CWA2b e-Invoicing Compliance Guidelines_v0.90-b
- CWA3 Assessing new business processes and technologies for eInvoicing
- CWA4 Emerging network infrastructure of eInvoice service providers throughout Europe
Comments have to be written down in the attached template and to be sent to the Secretary by 20 August 2009 at the latest.
More information on : http://www.cen.eu/cenorm/sectors/sectors/isss/activity/einvoicing_2.asp
Please forward this message to any interested party.
Comments can also be posted on ebusiness knowledge village
on Slideshare
http://www.slideshare.net/group/electronic-business-knowledge-village
on linkedin
http://www.linkedin.com/groups?gid=1106767
FP5 IST eGov Project Presentation at the French Prime Minister Cabinet in 2002Efthimios Tambouris
Presentation of the FP5 IST eGov research project, given to the French Prime Minister Cabinet Office in 2002. Back then, I was working for Archetypon SA, a Greek IT company.
Similar to CEN eInvoice Phase 2 Intermediary Report (20)
We present to you the E-invoicing Yearbook 2017 - Q1. It shows the relevant content on e-invoicing, AP automation, e-procurement and compliance, published by us and our sponsors during the first quarter of 2017.
Our daily search for content regarding e-invoicing, AP automation and e-procurement lead to over 2,000 posts, published the past eight years.
On average, the E-invoicing Platform publishes ten posts per week. These posts are both user generated content from our sponsors, as well as content from other valuable sources.
This content is also published on Twitter, on LinkedIN and on Google (News). And every other week, the posts get extra attention via our newsletter, with currently over 8,900 recipients in 100+ countries.
As each post is interesting and newsworthy by itself, this is increased when we sort these posts in the sections underneath:
- Featured providers
- Opinions
- Mandatory and compliant e-invoicing:
- Interoperability and standardisation (in Europe):
- Case studies
- News in general
- Downloads, infographics and more
- Beyond e-invoicing: innovative and new services -
- Acquisitions, mergers and funding
- Around the globe
After each quarter of the year ends the E-invoicing Yearbook will be updated, building a picture of how the world of e-invoicing is progressing.
Publications 2017, Title only
Top mailing list providers in the USA.pptxJeremyPeirce1
Discover the top mailing list providers in the USA, offering targeted lists, segmentation, and analytics to optimize your marketing campaigns and drive engagement.
Implicitly or explicitly all competing businesses employ a strategy to select a mix
of marketing resources. Formulating such competitive strategies fundamentally
involves recognizing relationships between elements of the marketing mix (e.g.,
price and product quality), as well as assessing competitive and market conditions
(i.e., industry structure in the language of economics).
Building Your Employer Brand with Social MediaLuanWise
Presented at The Global HR Summit, 6th June 2024
In this keynote, Luan Wise will provide invaluable insights to elevate your employer brand on social media platforms including LinkedIn, Facebook, Instagram, X (formerly Twitter) and TikTok. You'll learn how compelling content can authentically showcase your company culture, values, and employee experiences to support your talent acquisition and retention objectives. Additionally, you'll understand the power of employee advocacy to amplify reach and engagement – helping to position your organization as an employer of choice in today's competitive talent landscape.
Personal Brand Statement:
As an Army veteran dedicated to lifelong learning, I bring a disciplined, strategic mindset to my pursuits. I am constantly expanding my knowledge to innovate and lead effectively. My journey is driven by a commitment to excellence, and to make a meaningful impact in the world.
Understanding User Needs and Satisfying ThemAggregage
https://www.productmanagementtoday.com/frs/26903918/understanding-user-needs-and-satisfying-them
We know we want to create products which our customers find to be valuable. Whether we label it as customer-centric or product-led depends on how long we've been doing product management. There are three challenges we face when doing this. The obvious challenge is figuring out what our users need; the non-obvious challenges are in creating a shared understanding of those needs and in sensing if what we're doing is meeting those needs.
In this webinar, we won't focus on the research methods for discovering user-needs. We will focus on synthesis of the needs we discover, communication and alignment tools, and how we operationalize addressing those needs.
Industry expert Scott Sehlhorst will:
• Introduce a taxonomy for user goals with real world examples
• Present the Onion Diagram, a tool for contextualizing task-level goals
• Illustrate how customer journey maps capture activity-level and task-level goals
• Demonstrate the best approach to selection and prioritization of user-goals to address
• Highlight the crucial benchmarks, observable changes, in ensuring fulfillment of customer needs
[Note: This is a partial preview. To download this presentation, visit:
https://www.oeconsulting.com.sg/training-presentations]
Sustainability has become an increasingly critical topic as the world recognizes the need to protect our planet and its resources for future generations. Sustainability means meeting our current needs without compromising the ability of future generations to meet theirs. It involves long-term planning and consideration of the consequences of our actions. The goal is to create strategies that ensure the long-term viability of People, Planet, and Profit.
Leading companies such as Nike, Toyota, and Siemens are prioritizing sustainable innovation in their business models, setting an example for others to follow. In this Sustainability training presentation, you will learn key concepts, principles, and practices of sustainability applicable across industries. This training aims to create awareness and educate employees, senior executives, consultants, and other key stakeholders, including investors, policymakers, and supply chain partners, on the importance and implementation of sustainability.
LEARNING OBJECTIVES
1. Develop a comprehensive understanding of the fundamental principles and concepts that form the foundation of sustainability within corporate environments.
2. Explore the sustainability implementation model, focusing on effective measures and reporting strategies to track and communicate sustainability efforts.
3. Identify and define best practices and critical success factors essential for achieving sustainability goals within organizations.
CONTENTS
1. Introduction and Key Concepts of Sustainability
2. Principles and Practices of Sustainability
3. Measures and Reporting in Sustainability
4. Sustainability Implementation & Best Practices
To download the complete presentation, visit: https://www.oeconsulting.com.sg/training-presentations
Event Report - SAP Sapphire 2024 Orlando - lots of innovation and old challengesHolger Mueller
Holger Mueller of Constellation Research shares his key takeaways from SAP's Sapphire confernece, held in Orlando, June 3rd till 5th 2024, in the Orange Convention Center.
Premium MEAN Stack Development Solutions for Modern BusinessesSynapseIndia
Stay ahead of the curve with our premium MEAN Stack Development Solutions. Our expert developers utilize MongoDB, Express.js, AngularJS, and Node.js to create modern and responsive web applications. Trust us for cutting-edge solutions that drive your business growth and success.
Know more: https://www.synapseindia.com/technology/mean-stack-development-company.html
1. 1
CEN WORKSHOP eInvoicing Phase 2
Task Group 4 Intermediary Report
Friso de Jong, Chairman Task Group 4
Adrian Mueller,Expert Task Group 4
eInvoicing Public Meeting
Brussels, 29 September 2008
4. 4
Task Group 4: The people
- Expert: Adrian Mueller (Dr. Otto Mueller Consulting)
- Chair: Friso de Jong (Platform ELFA)
- Members: In order of appearance:
Andrea Caccia (Innovery), Anders Grangard (GS 1
International), Francis Berthomieu (Orange FT
Group), Otto Mueller (Dr. Otto Mueller Consulting),
Wolfgang Eckert (Deutsche Post), Klaus Foerderer
(GS1 Germany), Peter Potgieser (ABN Amro),
Erwann Revolt (Orange FT Group)
5. 2005 CEN – all rights reserved
Intermediary Report 1-10-2008
The main objectives
6. 2005 CEN – all rights reserved
Intermediary Report 1-10-2008
Task Group 4: The main objectives
Main objectives are based on the CEN/ISSS Phase II business case:
(source:http://www.cen.eu/cenorm/businessdomains/businessdomains/isss/activity/einvoicing_2.asp)
Implementation of compliant electronic invoice systems in using
emerging technologies and business processes; this will include
issues such as:
- assessment of business processes, i.e. b-2-b trading platforms.
Identification of new and emerging technologies with potential
impact on electronic invoices and related business processes
7. 2005 CEN – all rights reserved
Intermediary Report 1-10-2008
The main objectives put in context
8. 2005 CEN – all rights reserved
Intermediary Report 1-10-2008
Task Group 4: Main objectives in context
1. The CEN/ISSS eInvoice Phase II business case:
(source:http://www.cen.eu/cenorm/businessdomains/businessdomains/isss/activity/einvoicing_2.asp)
‘The objective (..) is to help to fill gaps in standardization [red:
interoperability] for the use of electronic invoice processes, to
identify the various practices in member states, to integrate the
emerging technical and practical solutions into effective best
practices, and to define and disseminate these best practices for
e-invoices in close coordination and cooperation with private
industry, solution providers and public administration.’
9. 2005 CEN – all rights reserved
Intermediary Report 1-10-2008
Task Group 4: Main objectives put in context
2. Commission decision setting up a Expert Group on eInvoicing:
(source:ec.europa.eu/internal_market/payments/einvoicing/index_en.htm)
‘Its tasks should be to identify business requirements(4)
and
responsibilities for the execution of specific work, as well as to
steer the creation — by the end of 2009 — of a European e-
Invoicing Framework to establish a common conceptual structure
to support the provision of e-Invoicing services in an open and
interoperable manner across Europe.’
‘(4) eInvoicing business requirements represent the characteristics that eInvoice services should
match in order to satisfy the stakeholders‘ business needs and goals, enabling the processes of
the entire financial and supply chains. They are expressed in terms of high level process flows,
eInvoice information and standard message structure.’
10. 2005 CEN – all rights reserved
Intermediary Report 1-10-2008
Task Group 4: Main objectives put in context
3. Objectives in the Europe i2010 statement:
(source:http://www.cen.eu/cenorm/businessdomains/businessdomains/isss/activity/einvoicing_2.asp)
’In summary, to launch the i2010 agenda on raising investment in
research and innovation the Commission will:[..]
Define e-business policies aiming to remove technological,
organisational and legal barriers to ICT adoption with a focus on
SME's.[..]
The Commission will support these efforts using a limited set of high
profile demonstrators to test technical, legal and organisational
solutions.’
11. 2005 CEN – all rights reserved
Intermediary Report 1-10-2008
Task Group 4: Main objectives put in context
Impact of this on the on the main objectives of Task Group 4:
Both organisational and technical aspects
Link with legal aspects on eInvoicing: fiscal and trade law compliance
Creating results with spill over effect towards SEPA, EEIF, i2010
Definitely exploit synergy with other CEN/ISSS eInvoice Phase II task
groups and deliverables: Draft Good Practice Guidelines
But also: careful not to enter into the domains of these task groups
12. 2005 CEN – all rights reserved
Intermediary Report 1-10-2008
Q: How is Task Group 4 to meet its
main objectives?
13. 2005 CEN – all rights reserved
Intermediary Report 1-10-2008
A: By focussing on several deliverables
Recommendations to amend Phase I eInvoicing CWA‘s (15582, 15576,
...)
Definitions set on e-Invoicing based on: purpose, context and parameters
Implementation guideline for ‘compliant electronic invoice systems using
new and emerging technologies, -business- processes and practices’
Possibly: document containing recommendations (perhaps for the EC
Expert Group on e-invoicing) for update of the VAT directive or national
laws?
14. 2005 CEN – all rights reserved
Intermediary Report 1-10-2008
The main objectives, context
and focus on deliverables,
demand for the use of a
‘framework’ in this Task Group
15. 2005 CEN – all rights reserved
Intermediary Report 1-10-2008
Framework step 1, 2, 3 and 4
PRACTICES AND
DEFINITIONS
16. 2005 CEN – all rights reserved
Intermediary Report 1-10-2008
Framework step 1: Definitions (1)
No standardised/basic/neutral set of definitions is now available
Such a set could on its own already create: semantic- interoperability:
understanding, and….acceptance.
A set of definitions could be derived from legal, technical, organisational
and common practice inputs:
EU Directives
Phase I CWA’s
UN/CEFACT
UBL, NES, XAF, XBRL, IDABC (EC programme) eProcurement
But also: common usages and best practices
17. 2005 CEN – all rights reserved
Intermediary Report 1-10-2008
Framework step 1: Definitions (2)
We discovered 15 sources of definitions on the field of e-invoicing
250+ phrases and definitions
These definitions differ based on their respective contexts:
legal, technical, organisational, common practice, commercial, supply chain, financial
supply chain, credit management, …
And differ based on their respective interests:
technical, commercial, policy, supply chain, banking, …
They also differ from usability based on objective parameters as:
technical neutrality, functional equivalence, usability,…
18. 2005 CEN – all rights reserved
Intermediary Report 1-10-2008
Framework step 1: Definitions (3)
How do we decide which ‘e-invoicing’ definition is ‘right’?
Approach: - define objective parameters, context and interests
- score the definitions based upon parameters
- build consensus
Q: Is it possible to come up with the [a] basic set of definitions fitted for all
purposes, interests and contexts?
A: That might be very difficult, also within the timeframe of this CEN Workshop.
19. 2005 CEN – all rights reserved
Intermediary Report 1-10-2008
Framework step 2: Models
The abundance of several definitions, contexts, interests and purposes
opens up the possibility that eInvoicing might very well be performed using
–combinations of- models.
Usage of eInvoicing could encompass models such as:
Seller direct (example: web-portal at seller‘s side)
Buyer direct (example: selfbilling)
Consolidator (example: ‘mywebportal’)
Four corner (example: sender>bank>bank>receiver)
Invoice automation (example: scanning and workflow)
Direct processing (example: sending signed invoices using Registered Mail)
There is not a ‘wrong’ or ‘right’ model. It is better to say: a: ‘good’ and
‘better’ suited model (again based on: context, interest and parameters)
20. 2005 CEN – all rights reserved
Intermediary Report 1-10-2008
Framework step 3: Processes
The models plus the definitions give a glance at all the existing –business-
processes on eInvoicing
A set of processes could very well be added to those already identified in
the Phase I CWA’s. Such as:
Disputing
Downloading
Print
Presenting
Factoring
Etcetera..
It is not in the domain of this Task Group to define these processes
21. 2005 CEN – all rights reserved
Intermediary Report 1-10-2008
Framework step 4: Technology
Technology>enables processes>enables models>influences
definitions.
Therefore several aspects of technology have an impact on the
processes.
But what the actual impact is, depends on the nature of this
technology. Even better: on the layer where its manifests itself:
Architecture (e.g. ebXML)
Transmission (e.g. EDIINT AS2)
Display (e.g. AJAX)
...
And this is how it looks in the model>>
22. 2005 CEN – all rights reserved
Intermediary Report 1-10-2008
Model or framework of Task Group 4
23. 2005 CEN – all rights reserved
Intermediary Report 1-10-2008
Q: How does this framework
relate to interoperability issues on
eInvoicing*?
(*in the Phase II business case, Commission Decision, i2010 declaration, EU Directive)
24. 2005 CEN – all rights reserved
Intermediary Report 1-10-2008
25. 2005 CEN – all rights reserved
Intermediary Report 1-10-2008
Q: Can Task Group 4 deliver a basic
set of definitions?
26. 2005 CEN – all rights reserved
Intermediary Report 1-10-2008
A: That is in fact one of the deliverables of
this Task Group, but….
How do we decide which ‘e-invoicing’ definition is ‘right’? Or: ‘better’ or ‘best’?
Approach: - define objective parameters, purpose and context
- score each definitions based on parameters, purpose and context
- build consensus
N.B. This does not guarantee that a single basic set of definitions can be
codified. It does however provide for a set of best suitable definitions, given its
context and purpose.
27. 2005 CEN – all rights reserved
Intermediary Report 1-10-2008
Q: Is the set of definitions the only
deliverable of Task Group 4?
28. 2005 CEN – all rights reserved
Intermediary Report 1-10-2008
A: Certainly not. This Task Group has set
its mind to four deliverables
Deliverable 1: Review of existing CWA’s when it comes to definitions and
inconsistencies (a legacy review)
Deliverable 2: Set of definitions, from which subsets can be derived, based on
context, parameters and purposes
Deliverable 3: Framework used in combination with definitions, to provide for
cross border/cultural communication support on e-invoicing
Deliverable 4: Implementation guideline when it comes to market oriented
innovation and implementation of new and emerging
technologies and –business- processes
29. 2005 CEN – all rights reserved
Intermediary Report 1-10-2008
A: These four deliverables are expected to
result in three CWA’s
Document 1: Review of existing CWA’s when it comes to definitions and
inconsistencies (a legacy review)
CWA 1: Set of definitions, from which subsets can be derived, based on
context, parameters and purposes
CWA 2: Framework used in combination with definitions, to provide for
cross border/cultural communication support on e-invoicing
CWA 3: Implementation guideline when it comes to market oriented
innovation and implementation of new and emerging
technologies and –business- processes
30. 2005 CEN – all rights reserved
Intermediary Report 1-10-2008
Q: What is the status of the expected
deliverables?
31. 2005 CEN – all rights reserved
Intermediary Report 1-10-2008
A: Task Group 4 is able to deliver well within
the assigned time frame (April 2009):
Deliverable 1: Internal review is finished. Results are proposed for review
in the workshop.
Deliverable 2: Definitions collected, contexts and purposes defined,
parameters needs to be defined. And then ‘score’ all definitions.
Deliverable 3: Already in place, needs to be documented including using
multiple examples. In conjunction with definitions (deliverable 2)
Deliverable 4: Information is already available, needs to be refined to fit to e-
invoicing. Using multiple examples. Also needs approval.
32. 2005 CEN – all rights reserved
Intermediary Report 1-10-2008
Q: How will the implementation
guideluine on new and emerging
technology and –business-
processes be created?
33. 2005 CEN – all rights reserved
Intermediary Report 1-10-2008
A: By taking into account:
1: a basic IT principle, that states: reuse before buy, buy before make, make
before develop
2: all the current developments on e-invoicing
3: that new and emerging technologies and business- process on e-invoicing
nowadays have a lot in common with innovation processes
4: that nowadays innovation is determined as the fifth wave of innovation:
open innovation [David Chessborough, 2003/2006]
5: that innovation on and implementation of emerging and new technologies
and –business- processes should be market oriented, market driven.
6: that quality is more important than an entirely new intellectual deliverable:
therefore not trying to reinvent the wheel again.
34. 2005 CEN – all rights reserved
Intermediary Report 1-10-2008
A: Therefore:
We combined the notice of a acceleration across Europe in marketoriented
innovation and implementation of new and emerging technologies and –
business- processes on e-invoicing, with
the notice that open innovation is increasingly used as innovation model,
because of several causes (will be explained), together with..
…a model that is best suited to combine open innovation and e-invoicing
And yes, this is an existing model. But it needs to be amended in order to fit the
purpose.
35. 2005 CEN – all rights reserved
Intermediary Report 1-10-2008
Q: Why are you using an existing
model?
36. 2005 CEN – all rights reserved
Intermediary Report 1-10-2008
A: Because:
1: it fits current developments on e-invoicing
2: it fits current developments on innovation: open innovation
3: the model as such is being successfully used for numerous purposes all
over the world
4: it is believed that the model can successfully be amended to fit the
purposes of this task group and its objective
5: it can be of great help for: providers, users, et cetera.
6: it enables to fit in all the deliverables of other task groups. (E.g.: the
Draft Good Practice Guidelines will be used twofold in this model!)
7: And: it will be able to realise this deliverable within the assigned time frame
So, why not use an existing model and improve it for e-invoicing innovation?
37. 2005 CEN – all rights reserved
Intermediary Report 1-10-2008
Q: In what form will the deliverables be
presented?
38. 2005 CEN – all rights reserved
Intermediary Report 1-10-2008
A: In most cases, a paper based
deliverable:
Deliverable 1: Paper based document
Deliverable 2: Paper based document, including an Excel sheet
Deliverable 3: Paper based document
Deliverable 4: Paper based document
39. 2005 CEN – all rights reserved
Intermediary Report 1-10-2008
Q: What is the timeline for the Task
Group deliverables?
40. 2005 CEN – all rights reserved
Intermediary Report 1-10-2008
A: Our timeline is:
Mid December 2008: concept CWA’s for deliverables 2, 3 and 4: 80 percent
complete.
Mid February 2009: next intermediary report
Mid February 2009: CWA’s open for review by workshop
41. 2005 CEN – all rights reserved
Intermediary Report 1-10-2008
Thanks for your attention