CONVERSATION ANALYSIS: interests and practicesBy Ms. Maricon C. Viduya
Conversation Analysisa research tradition that grew out of ethnomethodologyoriginated by Harvey Sack, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Gail Jefferson in the late 1960s and early 1970shas become an established force in sociology, anthropology, linguistics, speech-communication and psychologyparticularly influential in interactional sociolinguistics,  discourse analysis, and discursive psychology  studies the social organization of ‘conversation’ or ‘talk-in-interaction’, by a detailed inspection of audio or video recordings
The Conversation Analystbelieves that interaction is responsible for determining the nature of the relationship between peoplebelieves that social distance and power are not fixed properties but are negotiated through interactionbelieves that conversation/ talk-in-interaction is orderly
The main principles of conversation Conversation is a kind of activity with which people bring order to the worldThis activity is made up of a sequence of orderly actions (utterances)These actions as governed by rules or sets of expectations which people share with one anotherThese rules determine things like how we begin and end conversations, who gets to talk about what and when, and how we know when it is our turn to talk and when it is not
Model of Conversation by SackSpeaker-change recurs, or at least occursOverwhelmingly, one party speaks at a timeOccurrences of more than one speaker at a time are common, but briefTransitions (from one turn to the next) with no gap and no overlap are common.  Together with transitions characterized by slight gap or slight overlap, they make up the vast majority of transitions.
Model of Conversation by SackTurn order is not fixed, but varies; Turn size is not fixed but varies; Length of conversation is not fixed in advance; Relative distribution of turns is not specified in advance; What parties say is not specified in advance. Number of parties can vary;
Model of Conversation by SackTalk can be continuous or discontinuous; Turn allocation techniques are used. A current speaker may select a next speaker (as when he addresses a question to another party); or parties may self-select in starting a talk; Various turn-constructional units are employed; e.g. turns can be as short as a single word; and Repair mechanisms exist for dealing with turn-taking errors and violations; e.g. if two parties find themselves talking at the same time, one of them will stop prematurely, thus the trouble is repaired.
The central goal of CA researchthe description and explication of competencies that ordinary speakers use and rely on in intelligible, socially organized interaction
Methodological IssuesMost CA practitioners tend to refrain from extensive theoretical and methodological discussion.CA papers tend to be exclusively devoted to an empirically based discussion of specific analytic issues.It is an unusual species of scientific work.It is methodologically ‘impure’ but it works
Methodological Issuesdoes not generally have an a priori discussion of the literature to formulate hypotheses hardly any detail about research situations or subjects researched.no description of sampling techniques or coding proceduresNo testingNo statistics
Methodological IssuesData: Recorded naturally occurring, non experimental, ordinary everyday  conversation or institutional talkData should be free from too much a product of the researcher's or informant's manipulation, selection, or reconstruction, based on preconceived notions of what is probable or important Recorded data, instead, are indefinitely rich in empirical detail, which could never be produced by the imagination of anybody.
Methodological IssuesThe use of recorded data serves as a control on the limitations and fallibilities of intuition and recollectionThe availability of an audio or video record enables repeated and detailed examination of particular events in interaction and hence greatly enhances the range and precision of the observations that can be made
Methodological IssuesThe use of such materials has the additional advantage of providing hearers and, to a lesser extent, readers of research reports with direct access to the data about which analytic claims are being made, thereby making them available for public scrutiny in a way that further minimizes the influence of individual preconception.
Methodological IssuesThe transcriptions made after these are to be seen as a convenient form to represent the recorded material in written formBy making a transcription, the researcher is forced to attend to details of the interaction that would escape the ordinary listener.Transcripts provide the researcher with a quick access to a wide range of interactional episodes, that can be inspected for comparative purposes.
Methodological IssuesTranscriptions should not be made with a specific research problem or hypothesis in mind. The ideal would be to have a large corpus of very detailed transcripts that can be used to locate and analyze specific phenomena. For reporting purposes one could then use selected simplified transcripts.
The CA Reporta clear statement of the research issuesa description of the research site, participants, procedures for ensuring participant anonymity, and data collection strategiesan empirically based description of a clear and salient organization of patterns found through data analysis–including representative examples, not anecdotal informationinterpretations in which you trace the underlying organization of patterns across all contexts in which they are embeddeda discussion of how the data analyzed in the study connect with and shed light on current theoretical and practical issues in the acquisition and use of English as an L2

Ca ppt

  • 1.
    CONVERSATION ANALYSIS: interestsand practicesBy Ms. Maricon C. Viduya
  • 2.
    Conversation Analysisa researchtradition that grew out of ethnomethodologyoriginated by Harvey Sack, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Gail Jefferson in the late 1960s and early 1970shas become an established force in sociology, anthropology, linguistics, speech-communication and psychologyparticularly influential in interactional sociolinguistics, discourse analysis, and discursive psychology studies the social organization of ‘conversation’ or ‘talk-in-interaction’, by a detailed inspection of audio or video recordings
  • 3.
    The Conversation Analystbelievesthat interaction is responsible for determining the nature of the relationship between peoplebelieves that social distance and power are not fixed properties but are negotiated through interactionbelieves that conversation/ talk-in-interaction is orderly
  • 4.
    The main principlesof conversation Conversation is a kind of activity with which people bring order to the worldThis activity is made up of a sequence of orderly actions (utterances)These actions as governed by rules or sets of expectations which people share with one anotherThese rules determine things like how we begin and end conversations, who gets to talk about what and when, and how we know when it is our turn to talk and when it is not
  • 5.
    Model of Conversationby SackSpeaker-change recurs, or at least occursOverwhelmingly, one party speaks at a timeOccurrences of more than one speaker at a time are common, but briefTransitions (from one turn to the next) with no gap and no overlap are common. Together with transitions characterized by slight gap or slight overlap, they make up the vast majority of transitions.
  • 6.
    Model of Conversationby SackTurn order is not fixed, but varies; Turn size is not fixed but varies; Length of conversation is not fixed in advance; Relative distribution of turns is not specified in advance; What parties say is not specified in advance. Number of parties can vary;
  • 7.
    Model of Conversationby SackTalk can be continuous or discontinuous; Turn allocation techniques are used. A current speaker may select a next speaker (as when he addresses a question to another party); or parties may self-select in starting a talk; Various turn-constructional units are employed; e.g. turns can be as short as a single word; and Repair mechanisms exist for dealing with turn-taking errors and violations; e.g. if two parties find themselves talking at the same time, one of them will stop prematurely, thus the trouble is repaired.
  • 8.
    The central goalof CA researchthe description and explication of competencies that ordinary speakers use and rely on in intelligible, socially organized interaction
  • 9.
    Methodological IssuesMost CApractitioners tend to refrain from extensive theoretical and methodological discussion.CA papers tend to be exclusively devoted to an empirically based discussion of specific analytic issues.It is an unusual species of scientific work.It is methodologically ‘impure’ but it works
  • 10.
    Methodological Issuesdoes notgenerally have an a priori discussion of the literature to formulate hypotheses hardly any detail about research situations or subjects researched.no description of sampling techniques or coding proceduresNo testingNo statistics
  • 11.
    Methodological IssuesData: Recordednaturally occurring, non experimental, ordinary everyday conversation or institutional talkData should be free from too much a product of the researcher's or informant's manipulation, selection, or reconstruction, based on preconceived notions of what is probable or important Recorded data, instead, are indefinitely rich in empirical detail, which could never be produced by the imagination of anybody.
  • 12.
    Methodological IssuesThe useof recorded data serves as a control on the limitations and fallibilities of intuition and recollectionThe availability of an audio or video record enables repeated and detailed examination of particular events in interaction and hence greatly enhances the range and precision of the observations that can be made
  • 13.
    Methodological IssuesThe useof such materials has the additional advantage of providing hearers and, to a lesser extent, readers of research reports with direct access to the data about which analytic claims are being made, thereby making them available for public scrutiny in a way that further minimizes the influence of individual preconception.
  • 14.
    Methodological IssuesThe transcriptionsmade after these are to be seen as a convenient form to represent the recorded material in written formBy making a transcription, the researcher is forced to attend to details of the interaction that would escape the ordinary listener.Transcripts provide the researcher with a quick access to a wide range of interactional episodes, that can be inspected for comparative purposes.
  • 15.
    Methodological IssuesTranscriptions shouldnot be made with a specific research problem or hypothesis in mind. The ideal would be to have a large corpus of very detailed transcripts that can be used to locate and analyze specific phenomena. For reporting purposes one could then use selected simplified transcripts.
  • 16.
    The CA Reportaclear statement of the research issuesa description of the research site, participants, procedures for ensuring participant anonymity, and data collection strategiesan empirically based description of a clear and salient organization of patterns found through data analysis–including representative examples, not anecdotal informationinterpretations in which you trace the underlying organization of patterns across all contexts in which they are embeddeda discussion of how the data analyzed in the study connect with and shed light on current theoretical and practical issues in the acquisition and use of English as an L2