CLEARING  THE CERVICAL SPINE THE 2002 ORTHOPAEDICS AND SPINE LECTURE SERIES
LECTURE OUTLINE “ CLINICAL CLEARANCE” -  THE LATEST MANAGEMENT GUIDELINES ETIOLOGY OF MISSED CERVICAL SPINE INJURY THE QUESTIONS AND CONTROVERSIES - IS THERE A CONSENSUS?
LECTURE OUTLINE THE 3-VIEW RADIOGRAPH - A REVIEW OF THE APPROACH CERVICAL FRACTURES -  NONSKELETAL INJURIES THE PEDIATRIC C-SPINE -- THE ANATOMIC DIFFERENCES CONCLUSION/PEARLS WHAT IS IT?
“ CLINICAL CLEARANCE” -  THE LATEST ALERT, AWAKE,  NO AMS NO NECK PAIN NO DISTRACTING INJURY NO NEURO DEFICITS NO MIDLINE C-SPINE TENDERNESS
THE NEXUS STUDY ,  NEJM 7/00 P ROSPECTIVE  O BSERVATIONAL  S TUDY  -  34,000  P ATIENTS I DENTIFIED  A LL  B UT   8  O F   818  C SI 99%  S ENSITIVE , N EGATIVE  P REDICTIVE  V ALUE   99.8% A PPLICATION  O F  T HIS  D ECISION  I NSTRUMENT  W OULD  H AVE  D ECREASED  O VERALL  O RDERING  O F  X RAYS  B Y  12.6% == 100,000  C -SPINE  R ADIOGRAPHS  I N  T HE  U.S. P ER  Y EAR
MANAGEMENT GUIDELINES - WHY? CSI:  2-4%  OF ALL TRAUMA PATIENTS CSI: MOST COMMONLY MISSED SEVERE INJURY RAMIFICATIONS OF MISSED OR DELAYED DIAGNOSIS = NEURO INJURY OF PROGRESSON OF INCOMPLETE ONE AS WELL AS MEDICOLEGAL
MANAGEMENT GUIDELINES - WHY? CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINES ARE USED TO: “ REDUCE INAPPROPRIATE CARE, CONTROL GEOGRAPHIC VARIATIONS IN PRACTICE PATTERNS, AND MAKE MORE EFFECTIVE USE OF HEALTH CARE RESOURCES”
Classification of Scientific Evidence and Formulation of Recommendations
QUESTIONS & CONTROVERSIES WHO NEEDS XRAYS?  WHAT VIEWS?  XRAYS NEGATIVE BUT NECK PAIN PERSISTS ROLE OF FLEX/EXT, CT, MRI   “ DISTRACTING INJURY”?? OBTUNDED PATIENT -- WHAT TO DO?
DISTRACTING INJURY?
IS THERE A CONSENSUS? ACR ATLS EAST VVMC
VVMC   MANAGEMENT GUIDELINES
Awake & Alert Awake & Alert  Altered Mental Status with Neurological deficit No neuro deficit Possible C-Spine Injury Immobilize 3  or 5 View C-Spine X – rays Abnormal Consult Spine/Ortho Service Continue hard collar Cervical spine CT and/or MRI  Traction /Alignment  per Spine/Ortho. Service Normal
Awake & Alert No neuro deficit Significant Neck Pain CT Cervical Spine Positive Negative Consult Spine/Ortho Service C-spine Cleared C-spine Cleared Flexion  Extension Films No neck pain or tenderness with full range of motion  Positive Negative Consult Spine/Ortho Service Normal C-Spine X-rays
Consult Spine/Ortho Service  Continue hard collar  CT or MRI C-Spine Awake & Alert With  neurological deficit Normal C-Spine X-rays
Continue hard collar If patient becomes awake  and  cooperative proceed with Awake & Alert Guidelines If patient remains uncooperative obtain cervical spine CT scan Positive Negative Consult Spine Ortho C-spine Cleared when Awake & Alert Normal C-Spine X-rays Altered Mental Status
HOW IS A C-SPINE INJURY MISSED??? INADEQUATE CERVICAL SPINE SERIES MISINTERPRETATION OF STANDARD XRAY FILMS LACK OF APPROPRIATE INDEX OF SUSPICION
32,000  PTS,  740  CSI -  34 PTS (4.6%)  MISSED OR DELAYED “ MISSED” = IF PT DISCHARGED AND DX MADE IN F/U “ DELAY” = IF SPINAL PRECAUTIONS REMOVED, YET CSI DISCOVERED PRIOR TO DISCHARGE “ THE ETIOLOGY OF MISSED OR DELAYED DIAGNOSIS”   -  J. O F  T RUAMA , 1993
“ THE ETIOLOGY OF MISSED OR DELAYED DIAGNOSIS”   -  J. O F  T RUAMA , 1993
“ THE ETIOLOGY OF MISSED OR DELAYED DIAGNOSIS”   -  J. O F  T RUAMA , 1993
“ THE ETIOLOGY OF MISSED OR DELAYED DIAGNOSIS”   -  J. O F  T RUAMA , 1993
“ THE ETIOLOGY OF MISSED OR  DELAYED DIAGNOSIS”   -  J. O F  T RUAMA , 1993 CONCLUSION:  94%  OF THE ERRORS LEADING TO A MISSED/DELAYED DX OF CSI WERE FUNDAMENTAL – 1.  FAILURE TO OBTAIN CLINICALLY ADEQUATE 3-VIEW 2.  MISINTERPRETATION OF XRAYS
3-VIEW RADIOGRAPH:  AP, LATERAL, ODONTOID COMBINATION OF AP AND ODONTOID WITH LATERAL INCREASES SENSITIVITY FROM  85%  TO  92% 3-VIEW PLUS CT WITH SAGITTAL RECONSTRUCTION THROUGH SUSPICIOUS AREAS == FALSE NEGATIVE OF  .1%  IF TECHNICALLY ADEQUATE AND PROPERLY INTERPRETED
THE X-TABLE LATERAL THE UNDISPUTED MAINSTAY OF THE CERVICAL SPINE SERIES 85%  SENSITIVITY NEGATIVE PREDICTIVE VALUE:  .97  -- BUT NOT SUFFICIENT TO BE ONLY SCREENING STUDY
THE X-TABLE LATERAL TO BE ADEQUATE: OCCIPUT ALL 7 VERTEBRAE SUP. ENDPLATE OF T1
ABC’S OF THE LATERAL XRAY A: ALIGNMENT  B: BONY C: CARTILAGE S:  SOFT TISSUE
LATERAL C-SPINE:  A-ALIGNMENT
ANTERIOR SPINAL LINE
POSTERIOR SPINAL LINE
SPINOLAMINAR LINE
LATERAL C-SPINE: CLIVUS LINE AKA “ BASILAR LINE OF WACKENHEIM ” MEANS OF VERIFYING ATLANTO-OCCIPITAL RELATIONSHIP SHOULD INTERSECT POST.  1/3  OF DENS OR LIE TANGENT TO POST. CORTEX BASION-DENTAL INTERVAL  > 1.2  CM = ATLANTO-OCCIPITAL DISSOCIATION
#13, P. 6 FIG 2
 
LATERAL C-SPINE: B-BONY ASSESS FOR: VERTEBRAL BODY CONTOUR AND AXIAL HEIGHT LATERAL BONY MASS -PEDICLES, FACETS, LAMINA, TP SPINOUS PROCESS
#28 FIG 2-36 -
 
 
 
ASSESS FOR: INTERVERTEBRAL DISC FACET JOINTS LATERAL C-SPINE:  C-CARTILAGE
LATERAL C-SPINE: S-SOFT TISSUE ASSESS FOR: PREVERTEBRAL SPACE PREVERTEBRAL FAT STRIPE SPACE BETWEEN SPINOUS PROCESSES
 
FLEXION TEARDROP FRACTURE POSTERIOR SPINAL LINE PREVERTEBRAL SWELLING SPINOUS PROCESS WIDENING
AP XRAY ASSESS FOR:  ALIGNMENT SYMMETRY OF PEDICLES CONTOUR OF BODIES HEIGHT OF DISC SPACES CENTRAL POSITION OF SPINOUS PROCESSES
AP XRAY FACET JOINTS ORIENTED AT  45  DEGREE ANGLE FROM CORONAL PLANE -- THUS NOT SEEN ON AP IF FACET IS CLEARLY IDENTIFIED ON AP, ARTICULAR PILLAR OR PEDICLE FX WITH ROTATION IS LIKELY
 
AP XRAY - OTHER FINDINGS AIR COLUMN TRANSVERSE PROCESSES DISPLACED SPINOUS PROCESS FRACTURE MAY GIVE APPEARANCE OF “DOUBLE SPINOUS PROCESS” ABRUPT SIDE-TO-SIDE DISPLACEMENT OF SP CAN INDICATE UNILATERAL FACET SUBLUXATION/DISLOCATION
ODONTOID FILM ATLAS, ODONTOID, SUPERIOR FACETS OF AXIS ATLAS-AXIS RELATIONSHIP == JEFFERSON FX, C1-2 ROTATORY SUBLUXATION, ODONTOID FRACTURES
 
WHAT IS IT?
 
 
 
 
WHAT IS IT?
 
 
 
WHAT IS IT?
 
 
 
 
 
 
NONSKELETAL INJURIES - MUST CONSIDER IN “CLEARANCE” LIGAMENTOUS INSTABILITY SCIWORA CENTRAL CORD INJURY
Panjabi and White :  Dx of Clinical Instability in the Lower Cervical Spine Anterior elements Destroyed or Unable to Function  2 Posterior Elements Destroyed of Unable to Function  2 Relative Sagittal Plane Translation > 3.5mm  2 Relative Sagittal Plane Rotation > 11deg  2 Positive Stretch Test  2 Medullary (Cord) Damage  2 Root Damage  1 Abnormal Disc Narrowing  1 Dangerous Loading Anticipated  1 TOTAL OF 5 OR MORE = UNSTABLE
SCIWORA :  spinal cord injury without radiographic abnormality DEFINED BY PANG AND WILBERGER, 1982:  “ Objective Signs Of Myelopathy As A Result Of Trauma With No Evidence Of Fracture Or Ligamentous Instability On Plain Xray And Tomography ” FINDING OF FRACTURE, SUBLUXATION, OR ABNORMAL INTERSEGMENTAL MOTION AT LEVEL OF NEUROLOGICAL INJURY EXCLUDES SCIWORA AS A DIAGNOSIS
SCIWORA EXPERIMENTALLY, OSTEOCARTILAGINOUS STRUCTURES IN SPINAL COLUMN CAN STRETCH  2  INCHES WITHOUT DISRUPTION -- SPINAL CORD RUPTURES AFTER  1/4  INCH ANATOMICALLY, CERVICAL SPINAL CORD IS RELATIVELY TETHERED - SPINAL NERVES, DURAL ATTACHMENT TO FORAMEN MAGNUM, AND BRACHIAL PLEXUS
SCIWORA: LATENT PERIOD PANG AND WILBERGER:  13  OF  24  CHILDREN WITH SCIWORA WITH LATENT PERIOD OF  30  MIN TO  4  DAYS (MEAN  1.2  DAYS) BEFORE ONSET OF OBJECTIVE SENSORIMOTOR DEFICITS ALL  13  HAD TRANSIENT SUBJECTIVE COMPLAINTS AT TIME OF INITIAL TRAUMA THAT CLEARED WITHIN 1 HOUR OTHER STUDIES:  22%, 23%,  AND  27%  INCIDENCE OF SAME
SCIWORA PRESENTING NEURO EXAM CORRELATES TO OUTCOME MRI FINDINGS (OR LACK OF) MAY BE MORE PREDICTIVE OF OUTCOME NO CHILD HAS BEEN DOCUMENTED TO DEVELOP SPINAL INSTABILITY AFTER DX OF SCIWORA
SCIWORA - TREATMENT NO CONSENSUS:  BUT HARD COLLAR IMMOBILIZATION FOR  12  WEEKS AND AVOIDANCE OF FLEX/EXT ACTIVITIES FOR ANOTHER  12  WEEKS HAS NOT BEEN ASSOCIATED WITH RECURRENT INJURY
MYELOPATHY PATHOPHYSIOLOGY -- CORRELATIVE ANATOMY  THE SPINAL CANAL:  WHAT IS THE SHAPE? PREPATHOLOGY FOR MYELOPATHY TO EXIST HOW DOES THE DEGENERATIVE CASCADE CAUSE STENOSIS?
 
MYELOPATHY -- SPINAL CANAL MEASURMENTS CRITICAL DIAMETER =  13  MM VEIDLINGER PAPER TORG RATIO KINETIC ASPECTS OF COMPRESSION
 
 
MYELOPATHY: Physical “ LONG TRACT SIGNS” DTRS BABINSKI AND CLONUS INVERTED RADIAL REFLEX HOFFMAN’S L’HERMITTES SIGN
PEDIATRICS: A BRIEF OVERVIEW OF THE ANATOMIC DIFFERENCES CSI IS RARE IN CHILDREN:  1%  OF ALL PEDS FRACTURES AND  2%  OF ALL SPINE FRACTURES BY AGE  8-10 , NO ANATOMICAL OR BIOMECHANICAL DIFFERENCES PEDS  < 10  Y.O. ARE FUNDAMENTALLY DIFFERENT DUE TO ANATOMICAL VARIATIONS OF THE DEVELOPING SPINE, AND TO A LESSER EXTENT, THE DIFFERENCES IN MECHANISMS OF INJURY
PEDS ANATOMY AND BIOMECHANICS INHERENTLY MORE MOBILE: GENERALIZED LAXITY OF INTERSPINOUS LIGAMENTS AND JOINT CAPSULES THICK CARTILAGINOUS ENDPLATES INCOMPLETE VERTEBRAL OSSIFICATION (WEDGE-SHAPED VERTEBRAL BODIES) SHALLOW ANGLED FACET JOINTS, ESPECIALLY B/W OCCIPUT AND C4 HEAD DISPROPORTIONATELY LARGE
 
INITIAL PEDIATRIC EVALUATION CLINICAL EVALUATION HAMPERED MECHANISMS OF INJURY = RISK FACTORS MOST RELIABLE  SIGNS OF CSI IN PEDS ARE NECK PAIN, GUARDING, TORTICOLLIS
PEDIATRIC ANATOMIC VARIANTS - NOT TRAUMATIC INJURY PSEUDOSUBLUXATION PERSISTENT SYNCHONDROSES ANTERIOR ANGULATION OF DENS FOCAL KYPHOSIS OF MID-CERVICAL SPINE DIFFERENT SOFT TISSUE MEASUREMENTS
 
 
PSEUDOSUBLUXATION
PEDIATRIC C-SPINE CLEARANCE CLINICAL CLEARANCE IF: AWAKE, ALERT, COOPERATIVE NO SIGNS OF CERVICAL INJURY MECHANISM NOT CONSISTENT WITH CERVICAL TRAUMA
PEDIATRIC C-SPINE CLEARANCE: OBTUNDED 5 VIEW PLUS CT OF THE AXIAL REGION FROM OCCIPUT TO C2 PREPONDERANCE OF INJURIES OCCUR FROM OCCIPUT TO C2 IN KIDS  < 8  Y.O. TECHNICALLY DIFFICULT REGION TO IMAGE WITH PLAIN RADIOGRAPHS MRI = STUDY OF CHOICE TO EVALUATE CORD AND SOFT TISSUE STRUCTURES
CONCLUSIONS/PEARLS 1-5%  OF CSI ARE MISSED - MAINTAIN APPROPRIATE LEVEL OF SUSPICION IF SEEING A PATIENT WITH CONTINUED NECK PAIN AFTER BEING “ CLEARED ” -- KNOW THE BASIC MANAGEMENT GUIDELINES FOR CLEARING THE C-SPINE
CONCLUSIONS/PEARLS MISSED/DELAYED CSI OCCURS DUE TO LACK OF AN APPROPRIATE INDEX OF SUSPICION, INADEQUATE PLAIN FILMS, AND MISREAD STUDIES
CONCLUSIONS/PEARLS IF HAVE HIGH ENOUGH INDEX OF SUSPICION TO GET XRAYS, THEN DO NOT ACCEPT INADEQUATE ONES
CONCLUSIONS/PEARLS IN “CLEARING” THE C-SPINE, DO NOT FORGET NONSKELETAL INJURIES: LIGAMENTOUS INSTABILITY, CERVICAL STENOSIS, AND SCIOWRA
CONCLUSIONS/PEARLS KNOW YOUR PEDIATRIC ANATOMICAL VARIATIONS
CONCLUSIONS/PEARLS DON’T BE IN A HURRY TO CLEAR THE CERVICAL SPINE - CAN ALWAYS LEAVE IN A HARD COLLAR
 
Thank You!

Cervical Spine Injury | C Spine | Clearing the Cervical Spine

  • 1.
  • 2.
  • 3.
  • 4.
  • 5.
    CLEARING THECERVICAL SPINE THE 2002 ORTHOPAEDICS AND SPINE LECTURE SERIES
  • 6.
    LECTURE OUTLINE “CLINICAL CLEARANCE” - THE LATEST MANAGEMENT GUIDELINES ETIOLOGY OF MISSED CERVICAL SPINE INJURY THE QUESTIONS AND CONTROVERSIES - IS THERE A CONSENSUS?
  • 7.
    LECTURE OUTLINE THE3-VIEW RADIOGRAPH - A REVIEW OF THE APPROACH CERVICAL FRACTURES - NONSKELETAL INJURIES THE PEDIATRIC C-SPINE -- THE ANATOMIC DIFFERENCES CONCLUSION/PEARLS WHAT IS IT?
  • 8.
    “ CLINICAL CLEARANCE”- THE LATEST ALERT, AWAKE, NO AMS NO NECK PAIN NO DISTRACTING INJURY NO NEURO DEFICITS NO MIDLINE C-SPINE TENDERNESS
  • 9.
    THE NEXUS STUDY, NEJM 7/00 P ROSPECTIVE O BSERVATIONAL S TUDY - 34,000 P ATIENTS I DENTIFIED A LL B UT 8 O F 818 C SI 99% S ENSITIVE , N EGATIVE P REDICTIVE V ALUE 99.8% A PPLICATION O F T HIS D ECISION I NSTRUMENT W OULD H AVE D ECREASED O VERALL O RDERING O F X RAYS B Y 12.6% == 100,000 C -SPINE R ADIOGRAPHS I N T HE U.S. P ER Y EAR
  • 10.
    MANAGEMENT GUIDELINES -WHY? CSI: 2-4% OF ALL TRAUMA PATIENTS CSI: MOST COMMONLY MISSED SEVERE INJURY RAMIFICATIONS OF MISSED OR DELAYED DIAGNOSIS = NEURO INJURY OF PROGRESSON OF INCOMPLETE ONE AS WELL AS MEDICOLEGAL
  • 11.
    MANAGEMENT GUIDELINES -WHY? CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINES ARE USED TO: “ REDUCE INAPPROPRIATE CARE, CONTROL GEOGRAPHIC VARIATIONS IN PRACTICE PATTERNS, AND MAKE MORE EFFECTIVE USE OF HEALTH CARE RESOURCES”
  • 12.
    Classification of ScientificEvidence and Formulation of Recommendations
  • 13.
    QUESTIONS & CONTROVERSIESWHO NEEDS XRAYS? WHAT VIEWS? XRAYS NEGATIVE BUT NECK PAIN PERSISTS ROLE OF FLEX/EXT, CT, MRI “ DISTRACTING INJURY”?? OBTUNDED PATIENT -- WHAT TO DO?
  • 14.
  • 15.
    IS THERE ACONSENSUS? ACR ATLS EAST VVMC
  • 16.
    VVMC MANAGEMENT GUIDELINES
  • 17.
    Awake & AlertAwake & Alert Altered Mental Status with Neurological deficit No neuro deficit Possible C-Spine Injury Immobilize 3 or 5 View C-Spine X – rays Abnormal Consult Spine/Ortho Service Continue hard collar Cervical spine CT and/or MRI Traction /Alignment per Spine/Ortho. Service Normal
  • 18.
    Awake & AlertNo neuro deficit Significant Neck Pain CT Cervical Spine Positive Negative Consult Spine/Ortho Service C-spine Cleared C-spine Cleared Flexion Extension Films No neck pain or tenderness with full range of motion Positive Negative Consult Spine/Ortho Service Normal C-Spine X-rays
  • 19.
    Consult Spine/Ortho Service Continue hard collar CT or MRI C-Spine Awake & Alert With neurological deficit Normal C-Spine X-rays
  • 20.
    Continue hard collarIf patient becomes awake and cooperative proceed with Awake & Alert Guidelines If patient remains uncooperative obtain cervical spine CT scan Positive Negative Consult Spine Ortho C-spine Cleared when Awake & Alert Normal C-Spine X-rays Altered Mental Status
  • 21.
    HOW IS AC-SPINE INJURY MISSED??? INADEQUATE CERVICAL SPINE SERIES MISINTERPRETATION OF STANDARD XRAY FILMS LACK OF APPROPRIATE INDEX OF SUSPICION
  • 22.
    32,000 PTS, 740 CSI - 34 PTS (4.6%) MISSED OR DELAYED “ MISSED” = IF PT DISCHARGED AND DX MADE IN F/U “ DELAY” = IF SPINAL PRECAUTIONS REMOVED, YET CSI DISCOVERED PRIOR TO DISCHARGE “ THE ETIOLOGY OF MISSED OR DELAYED DIAGNOSIS” - J. O F T RUAMA , 1993
  • 23.
    “ THE ETIOLOGYOF MISSED OR DELAYED DIAGNOSIS” - J. O F T RUAMA , 1993
  • 24.
    “ THE ETIOLOGYOF MISSED OR DELAYED DIAGNOSIS” - J. O F T RUAMA , 1993
  • 25.
    “ THE ETIOLOGYOF MISSED OR DELAYED DIAGNOSIS” - J. O F T RUAMA , 1993
  • 26.
    “ THE ETIOLOGYOF MISSED OR DELAYED DIAGNOSIS” - J. O F T RUAMA , 1993 CONCLUSION: 94% OF THE ERRORS LEADING TO A MISSED/DELAYED DX OF CSI WERE FUNDAMENTAL – 1. FAILURE TO OBTAIN CLINICALLY ADEQUATE 3-VIEW 2. MISINTERPRETATION OF XRAYS
  • 27.
    3-VIEW RADIOGRAPH: AP, LATERAL, ODONTOID COMBINATION OF AP AND ODONTOID WITH LATERAL INCREASES SENSITIVITY FROM 85% TO 92% 3-VIEW PLUS CT WITH SAGITTAL RECONSTRUCTION THROUGH SUSPICIOUS AREAS == FALSE NEGATIVE OF .1% IF TECHNICALLY ADEQUATE AND PROPERLY INTERPRETED
  • 28.
    THE X-TABLE LATERALTHE UNDISPUTED MAINSTAY OF THE CERVICAL SPINE SERIES 85% SENSITIVITY NEGATIVE PREDICTIVE VALUE: .97 -- BUT NOT SUFFICIENT TO BE ONLY SCREENING STUDY
  • 29.
    THE X-TABLE LATERALTO BE ADEQUATE: OCCIPUT ALL 7 VERTEBRAE SUP. ENDPLATE OF T1
  • 30.
    ABC’S OF THELATERAL XRAY A: ALIGNMENT B: BONY C: CARTILAGE S: SOFT TISSUE
  • 31.
    LATERAL C-SPINE: A-ALIGNMENT
  • 32.
  • 33.
  • 34.
  • 35.
    LATERAL C-SPINE: CLIVUSLINE AKA “ BASILAR LINE OF WACKENHEIM ” MEANS OF VERIFYING ATLANTO-OCCIPITAL RELATIONSHIP SHOULD INTERSECT POST. 1/3 OF DENS OR LIE TANGENT TO POST. CORTEX BASION-DENTAL INTERVAL > 1.2 CM = ATLANTO-OCCIPITAL DISSOCIATION
  • 36.
    #13, P. 6FIG 2
  • 37.
  • 38.
    LATERAL C-SPINE: B-BONYASSESS FOR: VERTEBRAL BODY CONTOUR AND AXIAL HEIGHT LATERAL BONY MASS -PEDICLES, FACETS, LAMINA, TP SPINOUS PROCESS
  • 39.
  • 40.
  • 41.
  • 42.
  • 43.
    ASSESS FOR: INTERVERTEBRALDISC FACET JOINTS LATERAL C-SPINE: C-CARTILAGE
  • 44.
    LATERAL C-SPINE: S-SOFTTISSUE ASSESS FOR: PREVERTEBRAL SPACE PREVERTEBRAL FAT STRIPE SPACE BETWEEN SPINOUS PROCESSES
  • 45.
  • 46.
    FLEXION TEARDROP FRACTUREPOSTERIOR SPINAL LINE PREVERTEBRAL SWELLING SPINOUS PROCESS WIDENING
  • 47.
    AP XRAY ASSESSFOR: ALIGNMENT SYMMETRY OF PEDICLES CONTOUR OF BODIES HEIGHT OF DISC SPACES CENTRAL POSITION OF SPINOUS PROCESSES
  • 48.
    AP XRAY FACETJOINTS ORIENTED AT 45 DEGREE ANGLE FROM CORONAL PLANE -- THUS NOT SEEN ON AP IF FACET IS CLEARLY IDENTIFIED ON AP, ARTICULAR PILLAR OR PEDICLE FX WITH ROTATION IS LIKELY
  • 49.
  • 50.
    AP XRAY -OTHER FINDINGS AIR COLUMN TRANSVERSE PROCESSES DISPLACED SPINOUS PROCESS FRACTURE MAY GIVE APPEARANCE OF “DOUBLE SPINOUS PROCESS” ABRUPT SIDE-TO-SIDE DISPLACEMENT OF SP CAN INDICATE UNILATERAL FACET SUBLUXATION/DISLOCATION
  • 51.
    ODONTOID FILM ATLAS,ODONTOID, SUPERIOR FACETS OF AXIS ATLAS-AXIS RELATIONSHIP == JEFFERSON FX, C1-2 ROTATORY SUBLUXATION, ODONTOID FRACTURES
  • 52.
  • 53.
  • 54.
  • 55.
  • 56.
  • 57.
  • 58.
  • 59.
  • 60.
  • 61.
  • 62.
  • 63.
  • 64.
  • 65.
  • 66.
  • 67.
  • 68.
  • 69.
    NONSKELETAL INJURIES -MUST CONSIDER IN “CLEARANCE” LIGAMENTOUS INSTABILITY SCIWORA CENTRAL CORD INJURY
  • 70.
    Panjabi and White: Dx of Clinical Instability in the Lower Cervical Spine Anterior elements Destroyed or Unable to Function 2 Posterior Elements Destroyed of Unable to Function 2 Relative Sagittal Plane Translation > 3.5mm 2 Relative Sagittal Plane Rotation > 11deg 2 Positive Stretch Test 2 Medullary (Cord) Damage 2 Root Damage 1 Abnormal Disc Narrowing 1 Dangerous Loading Anticipated 1 TOTAL OF 5 OR MORE = UNSTABLE
  • 71.
    SCIWORA : spinal cord injury without radiographic abnormality DEFINED BY PANG AND WILBERGER, 1982: “ Objective Signs Of Myelopathy As A Result Of Trauma With No Evidence Of Fracture Or Ligamentous Instability On Plain Xray And Tomography ” FINDING OF FRACTURE, SUBLUXATION, OR ABNORMAL INTERSEGMENTAL MOTION AT LEVEL OF NEUROLOGICAL INJURY EXCLUDES SCIWORA AS A DIAGNOSIS
  • 72.
    SCIWORA EXPERIMENTALLY, OSTEOCARTILAGINOUSSTRUCTURES IN SPINAL COLUMN CAN STRETCH 2 INCHES WITHOUT DISRUPTION -- SPINAL CORD RUPTURES AFTER 1/4 INCH ANATOMICALLY, CERVICAL SPINAL CORD IS RELATIVELY TETHERED - SPINAL NERVES, DURAL ATTACHMENT TO FORAMEN MAGNUM, AND BRACHIAL PLEXUS
  • 73.
    SCIWORA: LATENT PERIODPANG AND WILBERGER: 13 OF 24 CHILDREN WITH SCIWORA WITH LATENT PERIOD OF 30 MIN TO 4 DAYS (MEAN 1.2 DAYS) BEFORE ONSET OF OBJECTIVE SENSORIMOTOR DEFICITS ALL 13 HAD TRANSIENT SUBJECTIVE COMPLAINTS AT TIME OF INITIAL TRAUMA THAT CLEARED WITHIN 1 HOUR OTHER STUDIES: 22%, 23%, AND 27% INCIDENCE OF SAME
  • 74.
    SCIWORA PRESENTING NEUROEXAM CORRELATES TO OUTCOME MRI FINDINGS (OR LACK OF) MAY BE MORE PREDICTIVE OF OUTCOME NO CHILD HAS BEEN DOCUMENTED TO DEVELOP SPINAL INSTABILITY AFTER DX OF SCIWORA
  • 75.
    SCIWORA - TREATMENTNO CONSENSUS: BUT HARD COLLAR IMMOBILIZATION FOR 12 WEEKS AND AVOIDANCE OF FLEX/EXT ACTIVITIES FOR ANOTHER 12 WEEKS HAS NOT BEEN ASSOCIATED WITH RECURRENT INJURY
  • 76.
    MYELOPATHY PATHOPHYSIOLOGY --CORRELATIVE ANATOMY THE SPINAL CANAL: WHAT IS THE SHAPE? PREPATHOLOGY FOR MYELOPATHY TO EXIST HOW DOES THE DEGENERATIVE CASCADE CAUSE STENOSIS?
  • 77.
  • 78.
    MYELOPATHY -- SPINALCANAL MEASURMENTS CRITICAL DIAMETER = 13 MM VEIDLINGER PAPER TORG RATIO KINETIC ASPECTS OF COMPRESSION
  • 79.
  • 80.
  • 81.
    MYELOPATHY: Physical “LONG TRACT SIGNS” DTRS BABINSKI AND CLONUS INVERTED RADIAL REFLEX HOFFMAN’S L’HERMITTES SIGN
  • 82.
    PEDIATRICS: A BRIEFOVERVIEW OF THE ANATOMIC DIFFERENCES CSI IS RARE IN CHILDREN: 1% OF ALL PEDS FRACTURES AND 2% OF ALL SPINE FRACTURES BY AGE 8-10 , NO ANATOMICAL OR BIOMECHANICAL DIFFERENCES PEDS < 10 Y.O. ARE FUNDAMENTALLY DIFFERENT DUE TO ANATOMICAL VARIATIONS OF THE DEVELOPING SPINE, AND TO A LESSER EXTENT, THE DIFFERENCES IN MECHANISMS OF INJURY
  • 83.
    PEDS ANATOMY ANDBIOMECHANICS INHERENTLY MORE MOBILE: GENERALIZED LAXITY OF INTERSPINOUS LIGAMENTS AND JOINT CAPSULES THICK CARTILAGINOUS ENDPLATES INCOMPLETE VERTEBRAL OSSIFICATION (WEDGE-SHAPED VERTEBRAL BODIES) SHALLOW ANGLED FACET JOINTS, ESPECIALLY B/W OCCIPUT AND C4 HEAD DISPROPORTIONATELY LARGE
  • 84.
  • 85.
    INITIAL PEDIATRIC EVALUATIONCLINICAL EVALUATION HAMPERED MECHANISMS OF INJURY = RISK FACTORS MOST RELIABLE SIGNS OF CSI IN PEDS ARE NECK PAIN, GUARDING, TORTICOLLIS
  • 86.
    PEDIATRIC ANATOMIC VARIANTS- NOT TRAUMATIC INJURY PSEUDOSUBLUXATION PERSISTENT SYNCHONDROSES ANTERIOR ANGULATION OF DENS FOCAL KYPHOSIS OF MID-CERVICAL SPINE DIFFERENT SOFT TISSUE MEASUREMENTS
  • 87.
  • 88.
  • 89.
  • 90.
    PEDIATRIC C-SPINE CLEARANCECLINICAL CLEARANCE IF: AWAKE, ALERT, COOPERATIVE NO SIGNS OF CERVICAL INJURY MECHANISM NOT CONSISTENT WITH CERVICAL TRAUMA
  • 91.
    PEDIATRIC C-SPINE CLEARANCE:OBTUNDED 5 VIEW PLUS CT OF THE AXIAL REGION FROM OCCIPUT TO C2 PREPONDERANCE OF INJURIES OCCUR FROM OCCIPUT TO C2 IN KIDS < 8 Y.O. TECHNICALLY DIFFICULT REGION TO IMAGE WITH PLAIN RADIOGRAPHS MRI = STUDY OF CHOICE TO EVALUATE CORD AND SOFT TISSUE STRUCTURES
  • 92.
    CONCLUSIONS/PEARLS 1-5% OF CSI ARE MISSED - MAINTAIN APPROPRIATE LEVEL OF SUSPICION IF SEEING A PATIENT WITH CONTINUED NECK PAIN AFTER BEING “ CLEARED ” -- KNOW THE BASIC MANAGEMENT GUIDELINES FOR CLEARING THE C-SPINE
  • 93.
    CONCLUSIONS/PEARLS MISSED/DELAYED CSIOCCURS DUE TO LACK OF AN APPROPRIATE INDEX OF SUSPICION, INADEQUATE PLAIN FILMS, AND MISREAD STUDIES
  • 94.
    CONCLUSIONS/PEARLS IF HAVEHIGH ENOUGH INDEX OF SUSPICION TO GET XRAYS, THEN DO NOT ACCEPT INADEQUATE ONES
  • 95.
    CONCLUSIONS/PEARLS IN “CLEARING”THE C-SPINE, DO NOT FORGET NONSKELETAL INJURIES: LIGAMENTOUS INSTABILITY, CERVICAL STENOSIS, AND SCIOWRA
  • 96.
    CONCLUSIONS/PEARLS KNOW YOURPEDIATRIC ANATOMICAL VARIATIONS
  • 97.
    CONCLUSIONS/PEARLS DON’T BEIN A HURRY TO CLEAR THE CERVICAL SPINE - CAN ALWAYS LEAVE IN A HARD COLLAR
  • 98.
  • 99.