SlideShare a Scribd company logo
Brown vs. board of education  1954 US Supreme Court case Lucy Eccleston Norvall
Background: Plessy v. Ferguson After the end of the American Civil War in 1865, during the period known as Reconstruction, the government was able to provide some protection for the civil rights of the newly-freed slaves.  Reconstruction abruptly ended with the Compromise of 1877 and federal troops were withdrawn, southern state governments began passing Jim Crow Laws that prohibited blacks from using the same public accommodations as whites.
Plessy v. Ferguson (Continued) Plessy v. Ferguson, (1896), is a landmark U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the constitutionality of racial segregation  under the docterine of “separate but equal“ "Separate but equal" remained standard doctrine in U.S. law until Brown Vs. Board of Education.
Plessy vs. Ferguson In 1890, the State of Louisiana passed Act 111 that required separate accommodations for African Americans and Whites on railroads, including separate railway cars, though it specified that the accommodations must be kept "equal".  Concerned, several African Americans (including Louisiana's former governer PBS Pinchback) and Whites in New Orleans formed an association, the Citizens' Committee to Test the Separate Car Act, dedicated to the repeal of that law. They raised $1412.70 ($33711.21 in 2008 USD) which they offered to the then-famous author and Radical Republican jurist, Albion W. Tourgée, to serve as lead counsel for their test case.  Tourgée agreed to do it for free. Later, they enlisted Homer Plessy, who was one-eighth black, to take part in an act of planned civil disobedience. The plan was for Plessy to be thrown off the railway car and arrestedbut for violating the Separate Car Act, which could and did lead to a challenge with the high court. The Committee hired a detective to ensure that Plessy was arrested for violating the Separate Car Act, which the Citizen's Committee wanted to challenge with the goal of having it overturned. They chose Plessy because, with his light skin color, he could buy a first class train ticket and, at the same time, be arrested when he announced, while sitting on board the train, that he had an African-American ancestor. For the Committee, this was a deliberate attempt to exploit the lack of clear racial definition in either science or law so as to argue that segregation by race was an "unreasonable" use of state power. The intellectual roots of Plessy v. Ferguson were in part tied to the scientific racism of the era. However, the popular support for the decision was more likely a result of the racist beliefs held by most whites at the time.[3
Plessy V. Ferguson (Continued) Thirteenth Amendment Section 1. Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction. Fourteenth Amendment Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the Plessy boarded a car of the East Louisiana Railroad that was designated for use by white patrons only.  He was able to purchase a ticket in first class because his light skin color, but was later asked to leave the car. Plessy refused to leave and was arrested. He sued the state of LA for infringing on his rights of the 13th and 14th Amendments.  privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
Plessy vs. Ferguson (cont’d) However, the judge presiding over his case, John Ferguson, ruled that Louisiana had the right to regulate railroad companies as long as they operated within state boundaries.  The Committee of Citizens took Plessy's appeal to the Supreme Court of Louisiana, which ruled with the state AGAIN.  The committee appealed to the United States Supreme Court in 1896. The Supreme Court sided with LA and RACIAL SEGREGATION WAS WRITTEN INTO US LAW.
Brown vs. Board of Education 1951 For next 90 years,  “separate but equal “doctrine ruled the land.  In 1951, a class action suit was filed against the Board of Education of the City of Topeka, Kansas in the U.S. District Court for the District of Kansas. The plaintiffs were thirteen Topeka parents on behalf of their twenty children.
Brown vs. Board of Education The suit called for the school district to reverse its policy of racial segregation. Separate elementary schools were operated by the Topeka Board of Education under an 1879 Kansas law, which permitted (but did not require) districts to maintain separate elementary school facilities for black and white students in twelve communities with populations over 15,000. The plaintiffs had been recruited by the leadership of the Topeka NAACP.  The named plaintiff, Oliver Brown, was a parent of Linda, a third grader, had to walk six blocks to her school bus stop to ride to Monroe Elementary, her segregated black school, which was  one mile (1.6 km) away, while Sumner Elementary, a white school, was seven blocks from her house.
Brown vs. Board of Education As directed by the NAACP leadership, the parents each attempted to enroll their children in the closest neighborhood school in the fall of 1951. They were each refused enrollment and directed to the segregated schools. Linda Brown Thompson later recalled the experience in a 2004 PBS documentary: The District Court ruled in favor of the Board of Education, citing the Plessy vs. Ferguson, (1896), which had upheld a state law requiring "separate but equal" segregated facilities for blacks and whites in railway cars The three-judge District Court panel found that segregation in public education has a detrimental effect upon negro children, but denied relief on the ground that the negro and white schools in Topeka were substantially equal with respect to buildings, transportation, curricular, and educational qualifications of teachers. The NAACP took the case to Supreme Court.
Brown vs. Board of Education Handed down on May 17, 1954, the Court's unanimous (9-0) decision stated that "separate educational facilities are inherently unequal." As a result, de jure racial segregation  was ruled a violation of the Equal Rights Amendment of the 14th Amendment of the US Constitution.

More Related Content

What's hot

Unit 9 PowerPoint Civil Rights Movement
Unit 9 PowerPoint Civil Rights MovementUnit 9 PowerPoint Civil Rights Movement
Unit 9 PowerPoint Civil Rights MovementCrosswinds High School
 
The Civil Rights Movement Timeline
The Civil Rights Movement TimelineThe Civil Rights Movement Timeline
The Civil Rights Movement Timelinesmliddll
 
Little Rock Nine
Little Rock NineLittle Rock Nine
Little Rock Ninenstechfun
 
Brown V Board Of Ed
Brown V Board Of EdBrown V Board Of Ed
Brown V Board Of Ed
core102
 
Jim Crow Signs Powerpoint
Jim Crow Signs PowerpointJim Crow Signs Powerpoint
Jim Crow Signs Powerpointtranceking
 
Rosa parks & the montgomery bus boycott
Rosa parks & the montgomery bus boycottRosa parks & the montgomery bus boycott
Rosa parks & the montgomery bus boycottPage1sm
 
Jim Crow PowerPoint
Jim Crow PowerPointJim Crow PowerPoint
Jim Crow PowerPointjar142
 
Little rock nine power point
Little rock nine power pointLittle rock nine power point
Little rock nine power point
virgilbruce55
 
The Birmingham Campaign
The Birmingham CampaignThe Birmingham Campaign
The Birmingham Campaign
RCB78
 
JIM CROW LAW
JIM CROW LAWJIM CROW LAW
JIM CROW LAW
kpine29
 
Montgomery Bus Boycott
Montgomery Bus BoycottMontgomery Bus Boycott
Montgomery Bus Boycott
RCB78
 
Rosa Parks
Rosa ParksRosa Parks
Rosa Parks
pritrazo
 
US civil rights Movement
US civil rights MovementUS civil rights Movement
US civil rights Movement
daviddunlop1
 
Gideon v. Wainwright
Gideon v. WainwrightGideon v. Wainwright
Gideon v. WainwrightTodd Beach
 
Civil Rights Movement
Civil Rights MovementCivil Rights Movement
Civil Rights Movement
Aaron Grifhorst
 
Civil rights powerpoint
Civil rights powerpointCivil rights powerpoint
Civil rights powerpoint
Kelly Milkowich
 
Civil rights movement
Civil rights movement Civil rights movement
Civil rights movement DFormyDuval
 
Citizens civics powerpoint
Citizens civics powerpointCitizens civics powerpoint
Citizens civics powerpointJason Zielinski
 

What's hot (20)

Unit 9 PowerPoint Civil Rights Movement
Unit 9 PowerPoint Civil Rights MovementUnit 9 PowerPoint Civil Rights Movement
Unit 9 PowerPoint Civil Rights Movement
 
The Civil Rights Movement Timeline
The Civil Rights Movement TimelineThe Civil Rights Movement Timeline
The Civil Rights Movement Timeline
 
Segregation
SegregationSegregation
Segregation
 
Little Rock Nine
Little Rock NineLittle Rock Nine
Little Rock Nine
 
Brown V Board Of Ed
Brown V Board Of EdBrown V Board Of Ed
Brown V Board Of Ed
 
Jim Crow Signs Powerpoint
Jim Crow Signs PowerpointJim Crow Signs Powerpoint
Jim Crow Signs Powerpoint
 
Rosa parks & the montgomery bus boycott
Rosa parks & the montgomery bus boycottRosa parks & the montgomery bus boycott
Rosa parks & the montgomery bus boycott
 
Jim Crow PowerPoint
Jim Crow PowerPointJim Crow PowerPoint
Jim Crow PowerPoint
 
Little rock nine power point
Little rock nine power pointLittle rock nine power point
Little rock nine power point
 
The Birmingham Campaign
The Birmingham CampaignThe Birmingham Campaign
The Birmingham Campaign
 
JIM CROW LAW
JIM CROW LAWJIM CROW LAW
JIM CROW LAW
 
Montgomery Bus Boycott
Montgomery Bus BoycottMontgomery Bus Boycott
Montgomery Bus Boycott
 
Rosa Parks
Rosa ParksRosa Parks
Rosa Parks
 
Civil rights powerpoint
Civil rights powerpointCivil rights powerpoint
Civil rights powerpoint
 
US civil rights Movement
US civil rights MovementUS civil rights Movement
US civil rights Movement
 
Gideon v. Wainwright
Gideon v. WainwrightGideon v. Wainwright
Gideon v. Wainwright
 
Civil Rights Movement
Civil Rights MovementCivil Rights Movement
Civil Rights Movement
 
Civil rights powerpoint
Civil rights powerpointCivil rights powerpoint
Civil rights powerpoint
 
Civil rights movement
Civil rights movement Civil rights movement
Civil rights movement
 
Citizens civics powerpoint
Citizens civics powerpointCitizens civics powerpoint
Citizens civics powerpoint
 

Similar to Brown Vs Board Of Education

Plessy V Ferguson Essay
Plessy V Ferguson EssayPlessy V Ferguson Essay
Plessy V Ferguson Essay
Online Paper Writing Services Haynes
 
Ferguson Vs Plessy
Ferguson Vs PlessyFerguson Vs Plessy
Group 3 power point
Group 3 power pointGroup 3 power point
Group 3 power pointJacobsBr412
 
The Courts And The Pursuit Of School Integration
The Courts And The Pursuit Of School IntegrationThe Courts And The Pursuit Of School Integration
The Courts And The Pursuit Of School IntegrationJacobsBr412
 
Brown v. board of education
Brown v. board of educationBrown v. board of education
Brown v. board of educationhoppa1177
 
Conflicts Of Segregation 2
Conflicts Of Segregation 2Conflicts Of Segregation 2
Conflicts Of Segregation 2stoklosa
 
Dbq Plessy V. Ferguson
Dbq Plessy V. FergusonDbq Plessy V. Ferguson
Dbq Plessy V. Ferguson
Lisa Fields
 
4th Amendment...
4th Amendment...4th Amendment...
4th Amendment...Dana Leon
 
4th Amendment
4th Amendment4th Amendment
4th AmendmentDana Leon
 
Plessy v. Ferguson Case by Shruti Misra
Plessy v. Ferguson Case by Shruti MisraPlessy v. Ferguson Case by Shruti Misra
Plessy v. Ferguson Case by Shruti Misra
SHRUTIMISRA7
 
African american education 19th cent
African american education   19th centAfrican american education   19th cent
African american education 19th cent
MELINDA TOMPKINS
 
Important Supreme Court Cases
Important Supreme Court CasesImportant Supreme Court Cases
Important Supreme Court Cases
Cory Plough
 
Civil rights 2
Civil rights 2Civil rights 2
Civil rights 2
Asaad Asaad
 

Similar to Brown Vs Board Of Education (14)

Plessy V Ferguson Essay
Plessy V Ferguson EssayPlessy V Ferguson Essay
Plessy V Ferguson Essay
 
Ferguson Vs Plessy
Ferguson Vs PlessyFerguson Vs Plessy
Ferguson Vs Plessy
 
Group 3 power point
Group 3 power pointGroup 3 power point
Group 3 power point
 
The Courts And The Pursuit Of School Integration
The Courts And The Pursuit Of School IntegrationThe Courts And The Pursuit Of School Integration
The Courts And The Pursuit Of School Integration
 
Brown v. board of education
Brown v. board of educationBrown v. board of education
Brown v. board of education
 
Conflicts Of Segregation 2
Conflicts Of Segregation 2Conflicts Of Segregation 2
Conflicts Of Segregation 2
 
Dbq Plessy V. Ferguson
Dbq Plessy V. FergusonDbq Plessy V. Ferguson
Dbq Plessy V. Ferguson
 
Brown vs. boardmycom
Brown vs. boardmycomBrown vs. boardmycom
Brown vs. boardmycom
 
4th Amendment...
4th Amendment...4th Amendment...
4th Amendment...
 
4th Amendment
4th Amendment4th Amendment
4th Amendment
 
Plessy v. Ferguson Case by Shruti Misra
Plessy v. Ferguson Case by Shruti MisraPlessy v. Ferguson Case by Shruti Misra
Plessy v. Ferguson Case by Shruti Misra
 
African american education 19th cent
African american education   19th centAfrican american education   19th cent
African american education 19th cent
 
Important Supreme Court Cases
Important Supreme Court CasesImportant Supreme Court Cases
Important Supreme Court Cases
 
Civil rights 2
Civil rights 2Civil rights 2
Civil rights 2
 

Brown Vs Board Of Education

  • 1. Brown vs. board of education 1954 US Supreme Court case Lucy Eccleston Norvall
  • 2. Background: Plessy v. Ferguson After the end of the American Civil War in 1865, during the period known as Reconstruction, the government was able to provide some protection for the civil rights of the newly-freed slaves. Reconstruction abruptly ended with the Compromise of 1877 and federal troops were withdrawn, southern state governments began passing Jim Crow Laws that prohibited blacks from using the same public accommodations as whites.
  • 3. Plessy v. Ferguson (Continued) Plessy v. Ferguson, (1896), is a landmark U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the constitutionality of racial segregation under the docterine of “separate but equal“ "Separate but equal" remained standard doctrine in U.S. law until Brown Vs. Board of Education.
  • 4. Plessy vs. Ferguson In 1890, the State of Louisiana passed Act 111 that required separate accommodations for African Americans and Whites on railroads, including separate railway cars, though it specified that the accommodations must be kept "equal". Concerned, several African Americans (including Louisiana's former governer PBS Pinchback) and Whites in New Orleans formed an association, the Citizens' Committee to Test the Separate Car Act, dedicated to the repeal of that law. They raised $1412.70 ($33711.21 in 2008 USD) which they offered to the then-famous author and Radical Republican jurist, Albion W. Tourgée, to serve as lead counsel for their test case. Tourgée agreed to do it for free. Later, they enlisted Homer Plessy, who was one-eighth black, to take part in an act of planned civil disobedience. The plan was for Plessy to be thrown off the railway car and arrestedbut for violating the Separate Car Act, which could and did lead to a challenge with the high court. The Committee hired a detective to ensure that Plessy was arrested for violating the Separate Car Act, which the Citizen's Committee wanted to challenge with the goal of having it overturned. They chose Plessy because, with his light skin color, he could buy a first class train ticket and, at the same time, be arrested when he announced, while sitting on board the train, that he had an African-American ancestor. For the Committee, this was a deliberate attempt to exploit the lack of clear racial definition in either science or law so as to argue that segregation by race was an "unreasonable" use of state power. The intellectual roots of Plessy v. Ferguson were in part tied to the scientific racism of the era. However, the popular support for the decision was more likely a result of the racist beliefs held by most whites at the time.[3
  • 5. Plessy V. Ferguson (Continued) Thirteenth Amendment Section 1. Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction. Fourteenth Amendment Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the Plessy boarded a car of the East Louisiana Railroad that was designated for use by white patrons only. He was able to purchase a ticket in first class because his light skin color, but was later asked to leave the car. Plessy refused to leave and was arrested. He sued the state of LA for infringing on his rights of the 13th and 14th Amendments. privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
  • 6. Plessy vs. Ferguson (cont’d) However, the judge presiding over his case, John Ferguson, ruled that Louisiana had the right to regulate railroad companies as long as they operated within state boundaries. The Committee of Citizens took Plessy's appeal to the Supreme Court of Louisiana, which ruled with the state AGAIN. The committee appealed to the United States Supreme Court in 1896. The Supreme Court sided with LA and RACIAL SEGREGATION WAS WRITTEN INTO US LAW.
  • 7. Brown vs. Board of Education 1951 For next 90 years, “separate but equal “doctrine ruled the land. In 1951, a class action suit was filed against the Board of Education of the City of Topeka, Kansas in the U.S. District Court for the District of Kansas. The plaintiffs were thirteen Topeka parents on behalf of their twenty children.
  • 8. Brown vs. Board of Education The suit called for the school district to reverse its policy of racial segregation. Separate elementary schools were operated by the Topeka Board of Education under an 1879 Kansas law, which permitted (but did not require) districts to maintain separate elementary school facilities for black and white students in twelve communities with populations over 15,000. The plaintiffs had been recruited by the leadership of the Topeka NAACP. The named plaintiff, Oliver Brown, was a parent of Linda, a third grader, had to walk six blocks to her school bus stop to ride to Monroe Elementary, her segregated black school, which was one mile (1.6 km) away, while Sumner Elementary, a white school, was seven blocks from her house.
  • 9. Brown vs. Board of Education As directed by the NAACP leadership, the parents each attempted to enroll their children in the closest neighborhood school in the fall of 1951. They were each refused enrollment and directed to the segregated schools. Linda Brown Thompson later recalled the experience in a 2004 PBS documentary: The District Court ruled in favor of the Board of Education, citing the Plessy vs. Ferguson, (1896), which had upheld a state law requiring "separate but equal" segregated facilities for blacks and whites in railway cars The three-judge District Court panel found that segregation in public education has a detrimental effect upon negro children, but denied relief on the ground that the negro and white schools in Topeka were substantially equal with respect to buildings, transportation, curricular, and educational qualifications of teachers. The NAACP took the case to Supreme Court.
  • 10. Brown vs. Board of Education Handed down on May 17, 1954, the Court's unanimous (9-0) decision stated that "separate educational facilities are inherently unequal." As a result, de jure racial segregation was ruled a violation of the Equal Rights Amendment of the 14th Amendment of the US Constitution.