Faced with the impossibility of Dilma Rousseff and Michel Temer build social peace in Brazil would need to be the resignation of both, respectively the Presidency and Vice-Presidency of the Republic to make way for the establishment of an interim government of national unity composed of respectable public figures accepted by all political forces in confrontation that would have the mandate to convene a new constituent assembly to reorganize the national life, seek the country's consensus in resolving the economic and social crisis, prevent the escalation of violence in Brazil and hold new general elections in the country . This would therefore be the way to avoid a fratricidal struggle or a civil war in Brazil when the dissension would remove the construction of a new social pact. If this policy solution is not adopted there will only be one outcome to the institutional impasse in which he lives the Brazilian nation that is the intervention of the armed forces for the maintenance of constitutional order to prevent the emergence of a civil war in Brazil.

1. 1
BRAZIL: SHIP OF FOOLISH
Fernando Alcoforado *
Imagine the situation of a ship that we could give the name of Brazil going to sink
without its occupants perceive the catastrophic situation which slowly is imposed. This
image is part of a medieval allegory, from Renaissance, represented by the most
different ways over the last five hundred years: The Ship of Foolish. There were few
who (brilliantly) brought to light all the splendor of this idea. Imbued with a sense of
self-criticism, this allegory describing the world and its inhabitants as a ship whose
passengers disturbed neither know nor care where they are going. The allegory
expressed some centuries before the Enlightenment that social evil results from
unreason, of not thinking. The Ship of Foolish is an ancient allegory which was treated
by the great Italian director Federico Fellini in his film E la nave va (The Ship).
In the Fellini film E la nave va - named The Ship - high class Italian artistic and social
embarks on a farewell tour of Edmea Tetua opera singer. There, amid the chaos brought
by ego, by death and non-grata presence of Serb refugees on the ship, they emerge the
most obscure and selfish aspects of human being. When playing with masterly skill the
most disturbing aspects of individuality on the environment, Fellini exposes the poorest
face of human existence. Much of the elements of the film The Ship, that is, the Ship of
Foolish are noticeable in contemporary Brazilian reality. No need to be a psychologist
to realize that individualism, greed and poverty of spirit are present in the gestures and
the critical position of the political class in Brazil.
We are all embarked in the same Ship named Brazil as the personages of Fellini heading
for disaster facing the most terrible storms, high winds, natural weathering and route
accidents in the economy and politics. Often we justify the absence of an altruistic
attitude by the simple fact that the other occupants of the ship also do not mind us. And
so, without worrying about the future, we touch the Ship called Brazil forward without
realizing that water is already touching the waist and that there is no turning back.
Think of an allegory designed in the medieval period before the discovery of America in
the first instance could lead us to believe that we are dealing with the representation of a
society completely apart. The bad news is that most of the elements of the Ship of
Foolish are present in contemporary Brazilian reality.
In short, the Ship of Foolish is a Renaissance allegory representing human existence as a
boat that leads fools (the rulers and the entire Brazilian population) who do not know
where it comes from, where they go and cannot give a minimum of rationality to your
lives. This is the situation in the moment in Brazil by the forces that support and oppose
the Dilma Rousseff government. The PT (Workers Party) governments of Lula and
Dilma Rousseff have exercised political power and failed entirely even in the effort to
combat social inequality even with the adoption of the Bolsa Familia income transfer
program. The failure of PT governments, above all, Dilma Rousseff is manifested in the
fact that about 80% of the population rejects their government and 70% wants
impeachment. These figures show the repentance of the majority of the electorate in the
election of Dilma Rousseff in 2014 for the presidency of Republic.
It is great folly, a government that has the rejection of most of the nation to insist on
staying in power at the cost of even cause social upheaval in Brazil. Several speeches of
government sectors threaten the use of violence if it happens impeachment of Rousseff
as was the case of Lula when he referred to the use of the "army" of the MST

2. 2
(Movement of Landless Workers) Stédile, the president of CUT (Central Sole of
Workers) Wagner Freitas who spoke on pick up weapons to defend the government and
the MST's Stedile who threatened to quit the country if Dilma be impeached. If the PT
governments failed to achieve what they wanted in 12 years that ruled Brazil, why they
insist on staying in the government at all costs with the rejection of the majority of the
population, and without the necessary parliamentary majority to rule? There isn´t in
these conditions that the PT and its allies will be able to achieve their political goals.
It is also a huge folly to insist on the maintenance of Dilma Rousseff as president of the
Republic that, besides has committed a responsibility crime, why suffer impeachment
process, she has demonstrated not have the necessary competence to lead the country in
pursuit of its economic and social reconstruction or have leadership that can unite the
majority of the nation around her. On the one hand, the folly is present in the ranks of
the bankrupt government of Dilma Rousseff, the same applies to the political forces
represented in Brazilian Congress who oppose her. We have the folly in the fact that we
in charge of the House of Representatives and the Senate two investigated of corruption
by Lava Jato Operation that investigate corruption in government, besides have
parliamentary many of which investigated for corruption and also with an excessive
number of political parties, with very few exceptions they have no commitment to the
future of the nation.
Given this environment in which, on the one hand, we have a government that does not
meet the conditions to govern and on the other, we have a rotten political system that
does not have capable alternatives to avoid the economic and political-institutional
collapse, that is, to avoid sinking of Ship called Brazil, the country may be convulsed by
a political struggle with unforeseeable consequences is to stay, either with the
impeachment of Rousseff. Both stay Dilma Rousseff or replacement in case of
impeachment by Michel Temer in the presidency will make Brazil be led to an
unprecedented widespread state of anarchy in the history of Brazil because both will
bring dissatisfaction for broad sectors of the population in view of be co-responsible for
the political, economic and social catastrophe that bankrupted the political and
economic systems in Brazil. Both scenarios would incite conflicts between supporters
and opponents of lulopetismo that could lead the country to civil war that would be
triggered by one of the political forces in conflict that be excluded from power.
Faced with the impossibility of Dilma Rousseff and Michel Temer build social peace in
Brazil would need to be the resignation of both, respectively the Presidency and Vice-
Presidency of the Republic to make way for the establishment of an interim government
of national unity composed of respectable public figures accepted by all political forces
in confrontation that would have the mandate to convene a new constituent assembly to
reorganize the national life, seek the country's consensus in resolving the economic and
social crisis, prevent the escalation of violence in Brazil and hold new general elections
in the country . This would therefore be the way to avoid a fratricidal struggle or a civil
war in Brazil when the dissension would remove the construction of a new social pact.
If this policy solution is not adopted there will only be one outcome to the institutional
impasse in which he lives the Brazilian nation that is the intervention of the armed
forces for the maintenance of constitutional order to prevent the emergence of a civil
war in Brazil.
* Fernando Alcoforado, member of the Bahia Academy of Education, engineer and doctor of Territorial
Planning and Regional Development from the University of Barcelona, a university professor and
consultant in strategic planning, business planning, regional planning and planning of energy systems, is

3. 3
the author of Globalização (Editora Nobel, São Paulo, 1997), De Collor a FHC- O Brasil e a Nova
(Des)ordem Mundial (Editora Nobel, São Paulo, 1998), Um Projeto para o Brasil (Editora Nobel, São
Paulo, 2000), Os condicionantes do desenvolvimento do Estado da Bahia (Tese de doutorado.
Universidade de Barcelona, http://www.tesisenred.net/handle/10803/1944, 2003), Globalização e
Desenvolvimento (Editora Nobel, São Paulo, 2006), Bahia- Desenvolvimento do Século XVI ao Século XX
e Objetivos Estratégicos na Era Contemporânea (EGBA, Salvador, 2008), The Necessary Conditions of
the Economic and Social Development-The Case of the State of Bahia (VDM Verlag Dr. Muller
Aktiengesellschaft & Co. KG, Saarbrücken, Germany, 2010), Aquecimento Global e Catástrofe
Planetária (P&A Gráfica e Editora, Salvador, 2010), Amazônia Sustentável- Para o progresso do Brasil e
combate ao aquecimento global (Viena- Editora e Gráfica, Santa Cruz do Rio Pardo, São Paulo, 2011),
Os Fatores Condicionantes do Desenvolvimento Econômico e Social (Editora CRV, Curitiba, 2012) and
Energia no Mundo e no Brasil- Energia e Mudança Climática Catastrófica no Século XXI (Editora CRV,
Curitiba, 2015).