The document outlines Bloom's revised taxonomy of educational objectives, which classifies learning objectives into six categories: remembering, understanding, applying, analyzing, evaluating, and creating. It provides examples of question prompts teachers can use for each category of learning objective to assess students' mastery. For remembering, prompts focus on recalling basic facts. For understanding, prompts require interpreting or summarizing information in one's own words. For applying, prompts involve applying concepts to solve problems or new situations.
This document provides an overview of examinable skills for the AS Education and Methods unit. It outlines the assessment objectives focusing on knowledge and understanding (AO1) and application, analysis, and evaluation (AO2). It provides examples of key concepts and theories students should know as well as research methods. The document also includes sample exam questions focusing on education topics assessing definitions, short explanations, outlines, and evaluations.
Bloom's Taxonomy is a classification of learning objectives within education. It categorizes objectives into cognitive domains: knowledge, comprehension, application, analysis, synthesis, and evaluation. Benjamin Bloom created this taxonomy to promote higher forms of thinking in education, such as analyzing and evaluating concepts, rather than just remembering facts. The document provides examples of measurable verbs that can be used to write learning objectives targeting each level of Bloom's Taxonomy to clearly communicate the expected cognitive behavior to students.
Bloom's Taxonomy is a framework created by Benjamin Bloom that categorizes levels of thinking. It includes six major categories: Knowledge, Comprehension, Application, Analysis, Synthesis, and Evaluation. The levels build on each other and involve increasing complexity of thought. Bloom's Taxonomy provides guidance for teachers in designing lessons and assessments that challenge students to progress to higher-order thinking skills beyond simple memorization.
Bloom's Taxonomy outlines six levels of cognitive skills moving from lower to higher order thinking skills: knowledge, comprehension, application, analysis, synthesis, and evaluation. Benjamin Bloom and his team created this taxonomy to categorize educational goals and intellectual abilities. The taxonomy provides a framework to ensure educational objectives incorporate higher level tasks that develop critical thinking skills necessary for success in formal assessments.
Classification of educational objectiveszunara-sabir
The document discusses the classification of educational objectives into three domains: cognitive, affective, and psychomotor. It provides detailed descriptions and examples of levels within the cognitive domain, including knowledge, comprehension, application, analysis, synthesis, and evaluation. Sub-categories and action verbs are provided for each level. The document also discusses objectives related to the affective and psychomotor domains.
Levels of Learning (Revised Bloom's of Taxonomy)lerise
The document discusses Bloom's Taxonomy, which classifies different levels of thinking. It provides an overview of the original 1956 taxonomy and the revised 2001 version. The revised taxonomy makes changes to terminology, structure, and emphasis. It uses verbs to describe cognitive processes and organizes thinking into a two-dimensional table with knowledge dimensions and cognitive process dimensions. This provides a more comprehensive framework for curriculum planning, instruction, and assessment. Sample questions are provided for each cognitive process to illustrate how they can be applied in teaching.
This document provides an overview of Bloom's Taxonomy, including both the original taxonomy developed in 1956 and the revised taxonomy from 2001. The original taxonomy classified learning objectives according to six cognitive levels, from simplest to most complex: Knowledge, Comprehension, Application, Analysis, Synthesis, and Evaluation. Criticisms of the original led to the development of a revised taxonomy that changed the hierarchy to a two-dimensional matrix and renamed some levels and domains.
This document discusses Bloom's Taxonomy and its revision, which categorizes different types of learning objectives from simple recall to evaluation. It also discusses essential questions, which spark curiosity and require students to construct their own answers. Finally, it explains Understanding by Design, an instructional framework that begins with identifying desired learning outcomes and designing assessments to measure student understanding.
This document provides an overview of examinable skills for the AS Education and Methods unit. It outlines the assessment objectives focusing on knowledge and understanding (AO1) and application, analysis, and evaluation (AO2). It provides examples of key concepts and theories students should know as well as research methods. The document also includes sample exam questions focusing on education topics assessing definitions, short explanations, outlines, and evaluations.
Bloom's Taxonomy is a classification of learning objectives within education. It categorizes objectives into cognitive domains: knowledge, comprehension, application, analysis, synthesis, and evaluation. Benjamin Bloom created this taxonomy to promote higher forms of thinking in education, such as analyzing and evaluating concepts, rather than just remembering facts. The document provides examples of measurable verbs that can be used to write learning objectives targeting each level of Bloom's Taxonomy to clearly communicate the expected cognitive behavior to students.
Bloom's Taxonomy is a framework created by Benjamin Bloom that categorizes levels of thinking. It includes six major categories: Knowledge, Comprehension, Application, Analysis, Synthesis, and Evaluation. The levels build on each other and involve increasing complexity of thought. Bloom's Taxonomy provides guidance for teachers in designing lessons and assessments that challenge students to progress to higher-order thinking skills beyond simple memorization.
Bloom's Taxonomy outlines six levels of cognitive skills moving from lower to higher order thinking skills: knowledge, comprehension, application, analysis, synthesis, and evaluation. Benjamin Bloom and his team created this taxonomy to categorize educational goals and intellectual abilities. The taxonomy provides a framework to ensure educational objectives incorporate higher level tasks that develop critical thinking skills necessary for success in formal assessments.
Classification of educational objectiveszunara-sabir
The document discusses the classification of educational objectives into three domains: cognitive, affective, and psychomotor. It provides detailed descriptions and examples of levels within the cognitive domain, including knowledge, comprehension, application, analysis, synthesis, and evaluation. Sub-categories and action verbs are provided for each level. The document also discusses objectives related to the affective and psychomotor domains.
Levels of Learning (Revised Bloom's of Taxonomy)lerise
The document discusses Bloom's Taxonomy, which classifies different levels of thinking. It provides an overview of the original 1956 taxonomy and the revised 2001 version. The revised taxonomy makes changes to terminology, structure, and emphasis. It uses verbs to describe cognitive processes and organizes thinking into a two-dimensional table with knowledge dimensions and cognitive process dimensions. This provides a more comprehensive framework for curriculum planning, instruction, and assessment. Sample questions are provided for each cognitive process to illustrate how they can be applied in teaching.
This document provides an overview of Bloom's Taxonomy, including both the original taxonomy developed in 1956 and the revised taxonomy from 2001. The original taxonomy classified learning objectives according to six cognitive levels, from simplest to most complex: Knowledge, Comprehension, Application, Analysis, Synthesis, and Evaluation. Criticisms of the original led to the development of a revised taxonomy that changed the hierarchy to a two-dimensional matrix and renamed some levels and domains.
This document discusses Bloom's Taxonomy and its revision, which categorizes different types of learning objectives from simple recall to evaluation. It also discusses essential questions, which spark curiosity and require students to construct their own answers. Finally, it explains Understanding by Design, an instructional framework that begins with identifying desired learning outcomes and designing assessments to measure student understanding.
Bloom’s Taxonomy and higher-order thinking
Take a walk down memory lane
Investigate the Revised Taxonomy
New terms
New emphasis
Explore each of the six levels
See how questioning plays an important role within the framework (oral language)
Use the taxonomy to plan a unit
Look at an integrated approach
Begin planning a unit with a SMART Blooms Planning Matrix
The document discusses Bloom's Revised Taxonomy, which updated Bloom's original taxonomy of educational objectives. The revised taxonomy changed the names of the categories from nouns to verbs to better reflect active thinking processes, reorganized some of the subcategories, and emphasized application of the taxonomy for curriculum planning, instruction, and assessment. The changes were intended to make the taxonomy a more authentic and universally applicable tool for categorizing thinking skills and designing learning activities.
This document discusses identifying a research problem and question, and conducting a literature review. It begins by outlining the chapter objectives, which are to understand the characteristics of research problems and questions, and the purposes and process of a literature review. It then discusses identifying a research problem, narrowing its focus, and developing good research questions. The purposes of a literature review are also outlined, such as helping determine best practices and pursuing a topic of interest.
The document summarizes the revised Anderson's taxonomy, which is a framework for classifying thinking skills into six levels - remembering, understanding, applying, analyzing, evaluating, and creating. It explains the changes made in the revised taxonomy, including changing categories from nouns to verbs and reorganizing the structure. Examples are provided for question stems teachers can use to target each level of thinking and assess student learning. In summary, the taxonomy is a tool to help plan effective curriculum, instruction, and assessments aligned to standards by categorizing learning objectives according to their cognitive complexity.
Dalam perlaksanaan PBS , Kementerian Pelajaran telah menerapkan HOTS sebagai suatu penilaian akademik menjelang PMR, PBS pada tahun 2014. Oleh itu para guru perlu membuat persediaan yang mantap bagaimana HOTS ini perlu diserapkan ke dalam minda pelajar.
Lorin Anderson revised Benjamin Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives in the 1990s. The two main changes were changing the categories from nouns to verbs and rearranging the order. The categories are now Remembering, Understanding, Applying, Analyzing, Evaluating, and Creating. This revision provides examples and key verbs for each category to better illustrate how to assess learning in a domain from lower order to higher order thinking skills.
Bloom's taxonomy categorizes levels of learning into six major categories from simplest to most complex: knowledge, comprehension, application, analysis, synthesis, and evaluation. Each category provides examples of verbs and learning activities. The categories move from recalling facts to creating new structures or solutions. The taxonomy provides a framework for setting learning objectives and assessing learning outcomes.
The document describes Bloom's taxonomy, a classification of learning objectives into cognitive domains originally published in 1956 and revised in 2001. It provides the six major categories in the cognitive domain: Remember, Understand, Apply, Analyze, Evaluate, and Create. For each category, it defines the skills involved and provides question verbs and learning examples. It also references similar frameworks for the affective and psychomotor domains created by other researchers.
The document discusses Bloom's taxonomy, a framework for categorizing levels of thinking skills. It outlines the six main cognitive levels from lowest to highest order: recall, comprehension, application, analysis, synthesis, and evaluation. For each level, examples are provided of associated thinking skills and question verbs. Recall involves remembering or recalling facts, terms, basic concepts, and answers given explicitly. Comprehension demonstrates understanding of meanings through activities like translating, interpreting, and summarizing. Application involves using learned information in new ways to solve problems or complete tasks. Analysis breaks down information into parts to understand its overall structure and organization. Synthesis combines different elements into a new whole, such as formulating a hypothesis. Evaluation makes judgments based on criteria
The document discusses Bloom's taxonomy, which is a framework for categorizing levels of thinking skills. It was created in 1956 and revised in 2001 to describe the cognitive, affective, and psychomotor domains of learning. The cognitive domain contains six categories that move from basic recall or recognition of facts to more complex and abstract levels of critical thinking. Educators can use Bloom's taxonomy to help design assessments, curriculum, and instruction that facilitate learning at different levels of thinking.
This document discusses strategies for integrating higher-order thinking skills (HOTS) and multiple intelligences (MI) in teaching, especially in the context of distance learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. It defines HOTS and MI, explains their benefits, and provides examples of activities that target different types of intelligence, such as verbal-linguistic, logical-mathematical, visual-spatial, bodily-kinesthetic, musical, interpersonal, intrapersonal, and naturalist. The document also outlines stages for teaching using MI and contrasts an MI-principled teacher with a traditional teacher. It encourages reflections on integrating these strategies into weekly instructional plans.
This document provides an overview of Bloom's Taxonomy, a classification of levels of thinking skills. It discusses the six main cognitive levels - Remembering, Understanding, Applying, Analyzing, Evaluating, and Creating. For each level, it lists thinking verbs associated with that level and provides potential classroom roles and activities. It also provides examples of questions teachers could ask students to target each of the different cognitive levels.
This document discusses best practices for conducting oral exams, including balancing assessment of knowledge, skills, and abilities. It recommends preparing standardized questions and marking schemes to reduce examiner bias while still allowing flexibility. Questions should be open-ended, focused on clinical scenarios, and probe higher-order thinking. Examiners must be aware of different discourse styles and frame questions and expectations appropriately. Ongoing examiner training and calibration helps ensure fair and reliable oral exams.
Essential Questions and DOK (Depth of KnowledgeCarla Piper
This document discusses essential questions, Bloom's taxonomy, understanding by design, backwards design, and depth of knowledge (DOK) levels as they relate to curriculum planning and assessment. It provides information on framing essential questions to drive student inquiry, designing assessments to evaluate different levels of thinking, and using the backwards design process to align objectives, activities, and evaluations. Examples are given throughout to illustrate key concepts for various subject areas like history, arts, and how they relate to standards like Common Core.
The document discusses strategies for internationalizing higher education research, including increasing cross-border collaboration through student and faculty exchanges, dual degree programs, branch campuses abroad, and co-authoring international publications. It emphasizes the importance of knowledge generation and dissemination through open access scholarly journals and conferences to advance the body of knowledge and address societal problems. The purpose of higher education is to produce and share scholarly work that contributes new theories, solutions, and plans for maintaining quality in teaching and research.
The document outlines six facets of understanding: 1) Explanation - providing knowledgeable accounts and inferences about why and how with evidence; 2) Interpretation - providing meaning and narratives to illustrate human experience; 3) Application - using knowledge effectively in new situations; 4) Perspective - considering critical and insightful points of view; 5) Empathy - getting inside another person's feelings and worldviews; 6) Self-knowledge - understanding one's own ignorance, blind spots, and preferred learning methods to develop further understanding. Developing these six facets is important for students to demonstrate a sophisticated level of understanding.
Effective Questioning techniques in ....ssusereb3fd5
The document discusses effective questioning techniques for teachers. It recommends that teachers ask questions of all students to promote equity. Some techniques to achieve this include think-pair-share, random calling on students, and group responses. The document also provides guidance on questioning levels, such as using Bloom's Taxonomy or classifications of literal, interpretive, critical and creative comprehension. Teachers are advised to use prompts when students can't answer and to wait at least 3 seconds for responses.
The document discusses effective questioning techniques for teachers. It recommends that teachers ask questions of all students to promote equity. Some techniques to achieve this include think-pair-share, random calling on students, and group responses. The document also suggests prompting students with different types of questions if they can't answer and revisiting important topics. Additionally, it discusses Benjamin Bloom's taxonomy of higher-level thinking skills and waiting an appropriate amount of time for students to respond before moving on.
Bloom’s Taxonomy and higher-order thinking
Take a walk down memory lane
Investigate the Revised Taxonomy
New terms
New emphasis
Explore each of the six levels
See how questioning plays an important role within the framework (oral language)
Use the taxonomy to plan a unit
Look at an integrated approach
Begin planning a unit with a SMART Blooms Planning Matrix
The document discusses Bloom's Revised Taxonomy, which updated Bloom's original taxonomy of educational objectives. The revised taxonomy changed the names of the categories from nouns to verbs to better reflect active thinking processes, reorganized some of the subcategories, and emphasized application of the taxonomy for curriculum planning, instruction, and assessment. The changes were intended to make the taxonomy a more authentic and universally applicable tool for categorizing thinking skills and designing learning activities.
This document discusses identifying a research problem and question, and conducting a literature review. It begins by outlining the chapter objectives, which are to understand the characteristics of research problems and questions, and the purposes and process of a literature review. It then discusses identifying a research problem, narrowing its focus, and developing good research questions. The purposes of a literature review are also outlined, such as helping determine best practices and pursuing a topic of interest.
The document summarizes the revised Anderson's taxonomy, which is a framework for classifying thinking skills into six levels - remembering, understanding, applying, analyzing, evaluating, and creating. It explains the changes made in the revised taxonomy, including changing categories from nouns to verbs and reorganizing the structure. Examples are provided for question stems teachers can use to target each level of thinking and assess student learning. In summary, the taxonomy is a tool to help plan effective curriculum, instruction, and assessments aligned to standards by categorizing learning objectives according to their cognitive complexity.
Dalam perlaksanaan PBS , Kementerian Pelajaran telah menerapkan HOTS sebagai suatu penilaian akademik menjelang PMR, PBS pada tahun 2014. Oleh itu para guru perlu membuat persediaan yang mantap bagaimana HOTS ini perlu diserapkan ke dalam minda pelajar.
Lorin Anderson revised Benjamin Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives in the 1990s. The two main changes were changing the categories from nouns to verbs and rearranging the order. The categories are now Remembering, Understanding, Applying, Analyzing, Evaluating, and Creating. This revision provides examples and key verbs for each category to better illustrate how to assess learning in a domain from lower order to higher order thinking skills.
Bloom's taxonomy categorizes levels of learning into six major categories from simplest to most complex: knowledge, comprehension, application, analysis, synthesis, and evaluation. Each category provides examples of verbs and learning activities. The categories move from recalling facts to creating new structures or solutions. The taxonomy provides a framework for setting learning objectives and assessing learning outcomes.
The document describes Bloom's taxonomy, a classification of learning objectives into cognitive domains originally published in 1956 and revised in 2001. It provides the six major categories in the cognitive domain: Remember, Understand, Apply, Analyze, Evaluate, and Create. For each category, it defines the skills involved and provides question verbs and learning examples. It also references similar frameworks for the affective and psychomotor domains created by other researchers.
The document discusses Bloom's taxonomy, a framework for categorizing levels of thinking skills. It outlines the six main cognitive levels from lowest to highest order: recall, comprehension, application, analysis, synthesis, and evaluation. For each level, examples are provided of associated thinking skills and question verbs. Recall involves remembering or recalling facts, terms, basic concepts, and answers given explicitly. Comprehension demonstrates understanding of meanings through activities like translating, interpreting, and summarizing. Application involves using learned information in new ways to solve problems or complete tasks. Analysis breaks down information into parts to understand its overall structure and organization. Synthesis combines different elements into a new whole, such as formulating a hypothesis. Evaluation makes judgments based on criteria
The document discusses Bloom's taxonomy, which is a framework for categorizing levels of thinking skills. It was created in 1956 and revised in 2001 to describe the cognitive, affective, and psychomotor domains of learning. The cognitive domain contains six categories that move from basic recall or recognition of facts to more complex and abstract levels of critical thinking. Educators can use Bloom's taxonomy to help design assessments, curriculum, and instruction that facilitate learning at different levels of thinking.
This document discusses strategies for integrating higher-order thinking skills (HOTS) and multiple intelligences (MI) in teaching, especially in the context of distance learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. It defines HOTS and MI, explains their benefits, and provides examples of activities that target different types of intelligence, such as verbal-linguistic, logical-mathematical, visual-spatial, bodily-kinesthetic, musical, interpersonal, intrapersonal, and naturalist. The document also outlines stages for teaching using MI and contrasts an MI-principled teacher with a traditional teacher. It encourages reflections on integrating these strategies into weekly instructional plans.
This document provides an overview of Bloom's Taxonomy, a classification of levels of thinking skills. It discusses the six main cognitive levels - Remembering, Understanding, Applying, Analyzing, Evaluating, and Creating. For each level, it lists thinking verbs associated with that level and provides potential classroom roles and activities. It also provides examples of questions teachers could ask students to target each of the different cognitive levels.
This document discusses best practices for conducting oral exams, including balancing assessment of knowledge, skills, and abilities. It recommends preparing standardized questions and marking schemes to reduce examiner bias while still allowing flexibility. Questions should be open-ended, focused on clinical scenarios, and probe higher-order thinking. Examiners must be aware of different discourse styles and frame questions and expectations appropriately. Ongoing examiner training and calibration helps ensure fair and reliable oral exams.
Essential Questions and DOK (Depth of KnowledgeCarla Piper
This document discusses essential questions, Bloom's taxonomy, understanding by design, backwards design, and depth of knowledge (DOK) levels as they relate to curriculum planning and assessment. It provides information on framing essential questions to drive student inquiry, designing assessments to evaluate different levels of thinking, and using the backwards design process to align objectives, activities, and evaluations. Examples are given throughout to illustrate key concepts for various subject areas like history, arts, and how they relate to standards like Common Core.
The document discusses strategies for internationalizing higher education research, including increasing cross-border collaboration through student and faculty exchanges, dual degree programs, branch campuses abroad, and co-authoring international publications. It emphasizes the importance of knowledge generation and dissemination through open access scholarly journals and conferences to advance the body of knowledge and address societal problems. The purpose of higher education is to produce and share scholarly work that contributes new theories, solutions, and plans for maintaining quality in teaching and research.
The document outlines six facets of understanding: 1) Explanation - providing knowledgeable accounts and inferences about why and how with evidence; 2) Interpretation - providing meaning and narratives to illustrate human experience; 3) Application - using knowledge effectively in new situations; 4) Perspective - considering critical and insightful points of view; 5) Empathy - getting inside another person's feelings and worldviews; 6) Self-knowledge - understanding one's own ignorance, blind spots, and preferred learning methods to develop further understanding. Developing these six facets is important for students to demonstrate a sophisticated level of understanding.
Effective Questioning techniques in ....ssusereb3fd5
The document discusses effective questioning techniques for teachers. It recommends that teachers ask questions of all students to promote equity. Some techniques to achieve this include think-pair-share, random calling on students, and group responses. The document also provides guidance on questioning levels, such as using Bloom's Taxonomy or classifications of literal, interpretive, critical and creative comprehension. Teachers are advised to use prompts when students can't answer and to wait at least 3 seconds for responses.
The document discusses effective questioning techniques for teachers. It recommends that teachers ask questions of all students to promote equity. Some techniques to achieve this include think-pair-share, random calling on students, and group responses. The document also suggests prompting students with different types of questions if they can't answer and revisiting important topics. Additionally, it discusses Benjamin Bloom's taxonomy of higher-level thinking skills and waiting an appropriate amount of time for students to respond before moving on.
This document discusses how to construct a table of specifications for test questions. It provides a 7-step process: 1) Determine number of test items, 2) List topics and time spent, 3) Calculate number of items per topic, 4) Round numbers, 5) Adjust totals, 6) Scatter items by cognitive level, 7) Allocate items. The purpose is to ensure tests are valid and cover appropriate content in a balanced way based on Bloom's taxonomy. Constructing a table of specifications helps improve test validity and identify question types needed.
This document outlines the key points of an effective training workshop on Bloom's Revised Taxonomy. The workshop aims to teach participants how to: 1) classify verbs and types of learning based on Bloom's dimensions; 2) identify appropriate assessments for each taxonomy level; and 3) apply the taxonomy to analyze standards, objectives, and instructional effectiveness. The document provides examples of developing objectives, aligned instructional methods, and assessments across Bloom's levels. Participants are guided to create meaningful objectives and assessments by considering what learners will do and how they will demonstrate their learning.
This document provides guidance on constructing a table of specifications (TOS) for test questions. It discusses the key elements needed for an effective TOS, including: thorough knowledge of Bloom's Revised Taxonomy; reference to budgeted lesson plans; simple mathematical computations; recall of teaching experiences; and preparation of budgeted lessons. The document reviews Bloom's Revised Taxonomy in detail and provides a step-by-step process for developing a TOS, including: determining the desired number of test items, listing topics and time spent, calculating the number of items per topic, adjusting totals, and allocating items across cognitive domains and topics.
This document provides guidance on constructing a table of specifications (TOS) for test questions. It discusses the key elements needed for an effective TOS, including: thorough knowledge of Bloom's Revised Taxonomy; reference to budgeted lesson plans; simple mathematical computations; recall of teaching experiences; and preparation of budgeted lessons. The document also reviews Bloom's Revised Taxonomy in detail and provides a step-by-step process for developing a TOS, including determining the desired number of test items, allocating items across topics and cognitive domains, and adjusting as needed to balance the TOS.
The document outlines a three stage process for designing curriculum and instruction called backward design. Stage 1 involves identifying desired learning outcomes and establishing goals. Stage 2 determines how student understanding will be assessed through evidence. Stage 3 plans learning experiences and instruction necessary to achieve the goals and demonstrate the desired evidence of understanding.
The document discusses higher order thinking skills and Bloom's Taxonomy. It explains that Benjamin Bloom created a taxonomy of learning objectives in 1956 that classified educational goals from simple recall to more complex thinking skills. The original taxonomy included knowledge, comprehension, application, analysis, synthesis, and evaluation. This was later revised to remove synthesis and replace it with creating. The document also discusses Webb's Depth of Knowledge (DOK) levels which range from recall and reproduction to extended strategic thinking. It provides examples of question stems aligned with each level of Bloom's Taxonomy and DOK to illustrate higher order thinking skills.
The document discusses Bloom's Taxonomy and its use in developing learning objectives. It outlines Bloom's original and revised cognitive domains, providing examples of verbs and outcomes for different levels. It also provides guidance on writing measurable learning objectives, including specifying the audience, behavior, conditions, and criteria. Educators are encouraged to design objectives and assessments that promote enduring understanding and allow students to demonstrate their learning in authentic ways.
Critical Analysis of Research Article (Team Assignment)· ·.docxfaithxdunce63732
Critical Analysis of Research Article (Team Assignment)
·
· Due Jan 11
Read the article provided by your instructor, and discuss it with your Learning Team. Discuss the research question posed, the authors' hypotheses, the research methodology, and the statistical concepts used. Consider the implications of the study. How did the authors interpret the results? Discuss the meaning and importance of the study.
Create a list of questions for those areas you know little about, and save these questions for discussion in the classroom. Include statistical questions, concepts, terminology, or anything that may be confusing to you.
Complete the Research Evaluation Form provided. The completed form--one per Learning Team--and the list of questions are due this week.
Note. There may be questions you are not able to answer at this time, but do your best. Confer with your Learning Team for clarification and assistance.
Research Evaluation Form
CCMH/525 Version 2
1
University of Phoenix Material
Research Evaluation Form
Use this form for both your individual and Learning Team article reviews.
Name(s): ______________________________________________
Quantitative study: __________
Qualitative study: _____________
Location of Researcher’s Observation or Experiment
none _________ home ________ clinic _________ lab __________
residential facility ________ school _________ hospital _________ other __________
Were children involved? Yes _____ No ______ If your answer is yes, how many? _________
Introduction
Research hypothesis or research questions/problem behaviors: ________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Operational definitions:
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Consider the following questions:
Is the need for the study clearly stated in the introduction?
_____________________________________________________________________________
Were the research questions and hypothesis clearly stated? Note that research questions are often presented implicitly within a description of the purpose of the study section.
Review of literature as relevant to the study: _________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________.
Selecting and constructing test items and tasksEzr Acelar
The document discusses measuring different levels of understanding from knowledge to deep understanding when constructing test items and tasks. It defines knowledge, simple understanding, and deep understanding and their relation on a continuum. It also outlines cognitive levels from remembering to creating and examples of lower and higher order thinking questions to assess each level. Constructed response and selected response question types are discussed as well as how they can be used to measure different cognitive levels.
Reflectivelearningcriticalthinking 150217022909-conversion-gate01jamal shah
The document discusses reflective learning and various related concepts. It defines reflective learning as involving students thinking critically about what they have read, learned, or done and relating lessons to their own lives. Reflection involves describing, analyzing, and evaluating thoughts, assumptions, and actions. Keeping a journal is presented as a way to engage in reflective learning by regularly writing about personal experiences, thoughts, and insights. Critical thinking is discussed as reasonable, reflective thinking focused on deciding what to believe and do. The document also emphasizes the importance of writing clear learning objectives that define what students will be able to do upon completion of an activity.
- 2 -Section CPlease write your essay in the blue book.docxgertrudebellgrove
- 2 -
Section C
Please write your essay in the blue book.
Write an informal narrative about "some" composing process of yours. Essentially, you will write a Reflective Self-Evaluation of yourself as a college writer. What exactly does that mean? It requires you to:
a. look back over a recently completed process
b. think reflectively about that process
c. critically evaluate what went well, what didn’t go well, or what you might have done differently
As the aforementioned examples suggest, reflective writing is writing that describes, explains, interprets, and evaluates any past performance, action, belief, feeling, or experience. To reflect is to turn or look back, to reconsider something in the past from the perspective of the present. So, in your final essay, you will reflect and make an evaluation of your experience in this course.
Remember, reflection involves multiple angles of vision. Just as light waves are thrown or bent back from the surface of a mirror, so, too, reflective writing throws our experience, action, or performance back to us, allowing us to see differently. We view the past from the angle of the present, what was from the angle of what could have been or what might be. Multiplying your angle of vision through reflection often yields new insights and more complicated (complex) understanding of the issue on which you are reflecting.
Professors generally look for four kinds of knowledge in reflective self-evaluation essays: self-knowledge, content knowledge, rhetorical knowledge, and critical knowledge (aka judgment). Following are ideas for each of these types of knowledge, which may be used to generate ideas for your essay. Choose only a few of the questions to respond to, questions that allow you to explain and demonstrate your most important learning for the course.
You may write about your composing process for academic papers or creative genres or a combination of both. Reflect as thoroughly as possible upon your writing process and explain it. Your narrative should include whatever you DO when you write, as well as whatever you DO when you compose. Composing should be understood in the broad sense, i.e. composing goes on in your mind when you are cleaning your refrigerator, mowing your grass, etc. It also occurs when you are researching, taking notes, or procrastinating. In essence you are NEVER NOT composing something. So the key to your reflections is to include everything you do that makes a difference in your writing, from having to use a certain pen, to listening to music or sitting in the library. Both your formal and informal processes impact the way you produce a written work, if you use a formal method of note taking or outlining, if you compose on the computer or with pen and paper explore any and all of these activities that are helpful to you in your process. Explore all possible aspects that apply. This is a useful exercise for now and for you to revisit and revise in the future .
- 2 -Section CPlease write your essay in the blue book.docxgertrudebellgrove
- 2 -
Section C
Please write your essay in the blue book.
Write an informal narrative about "some" composing process of yours. Essentially, you will write a Reflective Self-Evaluation of yourself as a college writer. What exactly does that mean? It requires you to:
a. look back over a recently completed process
b. think reflectively about that process
c. critically evaluate what went well, what didn’t go well, or what you might have done differently
As the aforementioned examples suggest, reflective writing is writing that describes, explains, interprets, and evaluates any past performance, action, belief, feeling, or experience. To reflect is to turn or look back, to reconsider something in the past from the perspective of the present. So, in your final essay, you will reflect and make an evaluation of your experience in this course.
Remember, reflection involves multiple angles of vision. Just as light waves are thrown or bent back from the surface of a mirror, so, too, reflective writing throws our experience, action, or performance back to us, allowing us to see differently. We view the past from the angle of the present, what was from the angle of what could have been or what might be. Multiplying your angle of vision through reflection often yields new insights and more complicated (complex) understanding of the issue on which you are reflecting.
Professors generally look for four kinds of knowledge in reflective self-evaluation essays: self-knowledge, content knowledge, rhetorical knowledge, and critical knowledge (aka judgment). Following are ideas for each of these types of knowledge, which may be used to generate ideas for your essay. Choose only a few of the questions to respond to, questions that allow you to explain and demonstrate your most important learning for the course.
You may write about your composing process for academic papers or creative genres or a combination of both. Reflect as thoroughly as possible upon your writing process and explain it. Your narrative should include whatever you DO when you write, as well as whatever you DO when you compose. Composing should be understood in the broad sense, i.e. composing goes on in your mind when you are cleaning your refrigerator, mowing your grass, etc. It also occurs when you are researching, taking notes, or procrastinating. In essence you are NEVER NOT composing something. So the key to your reflections is to include everything you do that makes a difference in your writing, from having to use a certain pen, to listening to music or sitting in the library. Both your formal and informal processes impact the way you produce a written work, if you use a formal method of note taking or outlining, if you compose on the computer or with pen and paper explore any and all of these activities that are helpful to you in your process. Explore all possible aspects that apply. This is a useful exercise for now and for you to revisit and revise in the future ...
This document outlines an agenda for a professional development session on incorporating rigor through effective questioning strategies. It includes activities where teachers discuss and share how they write test questions, ask questions in class, and use question information. Models of questioning like Bloom's Taxonomy and Ciardello's question types are presented. Teachers work in groups to match question types to taxonomy levels and provide examples. Accommodations for English learners and exceptional children are discussed. The session aims to dispel myths about rigor and provide strategies for increasing complexity, such as problem-based learning.
The document discusses critical thinking skills and Bloom's Taxonomy. It explains that critical thinking engages students in higher-level thinking and prepares them for further education. Bloom's Taxonomy classifies different levels of thinking skills from basic recall to more complex analysis, synthesis, and evaluation. The taxonomy was later revised to better reflect 21st century skills. Lesson planning should incorporate objectives, activities, and assessments targeting different cognitive levels to develop students' critical thinking abilities.
The document discusses using quick classroom assessments to gather student feedback through formative techniques like the feedback loop. It describes how feedback differs from evaluation in that it aims to improve teaching and learning without judgment. Several low-stakes assessment techniques are presented, such as minute papers, muddiest points, and entrance/exit slips, which can be implemented easily and anonymously to gain insight into student understanding and inform instruction. The key is for instructors to then close the feedback loop by sharing what they learned and making adjustments based on student input.
This document provides guidance on effective questioning techniques for teachers. It begins by outlining the learning objectives of being able to classify and ask questions according to different levels of comprehension. It then discusses why asking questions is important, such as making connections, predictions, ensuring understanding, and strengthening critical thinking. The document explains Bloom's Taxonomy for categorizing questions into different levels including remembering, understanding, applying, analyzing, evaluating, and creating. It provides examples of questions for each level. Finally, it offers tips for how questions should be asked in the classroom, such as reinforcing learning objectives, involving all students, encouraging speculation, and requiring complete answers.
The document discusses learning objectives and their importance in course development. It defines learning objectives as specific statements of what learners will be able to do after instruction. The document outlines the key components of learning objectives, including the performance, condition, and criterion. It also discusses Bloom's Taxonomy and how it can be applied to writing learning objectives for different domains like cognitive, affective, and psychomotor. The document provides examples of good and bad characteristics of learning objectives and gives guidance on writing clear, measurable objectives.
This document provides a 6-step research guide for students to follow when writing a critical analysis paper. The steps include picking a topic, developing basic knowledge, selecting a focus and separating facts from opinions, writing a thesis statement, supporting the thesis with evidence, and applying knowledge in a written report. Key tips are provided for each step, such as using "Terms to Know" to develop basic understanding or citing sources properly. The guide aims to lead students through the full research and writing process.
How to Add Chatter in the odoo 17 ERP ModuleCeline George
In Odoo, the chatter is like a chat tool that helps you work together on records. You can leave notes and track things, making it easier to talk with your team and partners. Inside chatter, all communication history, activity, and changes will be displayed.
Exploiting Artificial Intelligence for Empowering Researchers and Faculty, In...Dr. Vinod Kumar Kanvaria
Exploiting Artificial Intelligence for Empowering Researchers and Faculty,
International FDP on Fundamentals of Research in Social Sciences
at Integral University, Lucknow, 06.06.2024
By Dr. Vinod Kumar Kanvaria
A review of the growth of the Israel Genealogy Research Association Database Collection for the last 12 months. Our collection is now passed the 3 million mark and still growing. See which archives have contributed the most. See the different types of records we have, and which years have had records added. You can also see what we have for the future.
How to Manage Your Lost Opportunities in Odoo 17 CRMCeline George
Odoo 17 CRM allows us to track why we lose sales opportunities with "Lost Reasons." This helps analyze our sales process and identify areas for improvement. Here's how to configure lost reasons in Odoo 17 CRM
LAND USE LAND COVER AND NDVI OF MIRZAPUR DISTRICT, UPRAHUL
This Dissertation explores the particular circumstances of Mirzapur, a region located in the
core of India. Mirzapur, with its varied terrains and abundant biodiversity, offers an optimal
environment for investigating the changes in vegetation cover dynamics. Our study utilizes
advanced technologies such as GIS (Geographic Information Systems) and Remote sensing to
analyze the transformations that have taken place over the course of a decade.
The complex relationship between human activities and the environment has been the focus
of extensive research and worry. As the global community grapples with swift urbanization,
population expansion, and economic progress, the effects on natural ecosystems are becoming
more evident. A crucial element of this impact is the alteration of vegetation cover, which plays a
significant role in maintaining the ecological equilibrium of our planet.Land serves as the foundation for all human activities and provides the necessary materials for
these activities. As the most crucial natural resource, its utilization by humans results in different
'Land uses,' which are determined by both human activities and the physical characteristics of the
land.
The utilization of land is impacted by human needs and environmental factors. In countries
like India, rapid population growth and the emphasis on extensive resource exploitation can lead
to significant land degradation, adversely affecting the region's land cover.
Therefore, human intervention has significantly influenced land use patterns over many
centuries, evolving its structure over time and space. In the present era, these changes have
accelerated due to factors such as agriculture and urbanization. Information regarding land use and
cover is essential for various planning and management tasks related to the Earth's surface,
providing crucial environmental data for scientific, resource management, policy purposes, and
diverse human activities.
Accurate understanding of land use and cover is imperative for the development planning
of any area. Consequently, a wide range of professionals, including earth system scientists, land
and water managers, and urban planners, are interested in obtaining data on land use and cover
changes, conversion trends, and other related patterns. The spatial dimensions of land use and
cover support policymakers and scientists in making well-informed decisions, as alterations in
these patterns indicate shifts in economic and social conditions. Monitoring such changes with the
help of Advanced technologies like Remote Sensing and Geographic Information Systems is
crucial for coordinated efforts across different administrative levels. Advanced technologies like
Remote Sensing and Geographic Information Systems
9
Changes in vegetation cover refer to variations in the distribution, composition, and overall
structure of plant communities across different temporal and spatial scales. These changes can
occur natural.
How to Make a Field Mandatory in Odoo 17Celine George
In Odoo, making a field required can be done through both Python code and XML views. When you set the required attribute to True in Python code, it makes the field required across all views where it's used. Conversely, when you set the required attribute in XML views, it makes the field required only in the context of that particular view.
Strategies for Effective Upskilling is a presentation by Chinwendu Peace in a Your Skill Boost Masterclass organisation by the Excellence Foundation for South Sudan on 08th and 09th June 2024 from 1 PM to 3 PM on each day.
Film vocab for eal 3 students: Australia the movie
Blooms taxonomy
1. Revised
Bloom’s
Taxonomy
–
Question
Starters
Remembering-‐
Knowledge
Recall
or
recognize
information,
and
ideas
The
teacher
should:
• Present
information
about
the
subject
to
the
student
• Ask
questions
that
require
the
student
to
recall
the
information
presented
• Provide
verbal
or
written
texts
about
the
subject
that
can
be
answered
by
recalling
the
information
the
student
has
learned
Question
prompts
What
do
you
remember
about
______________?
How
would
you
define
_______________?
How
would
you
identify_________________?
How
would
you
recognize
____________________?
What
would
you
choose
_______________?
Describe
what
happens
when
_________________?
How
is
(are)
________________?
Where
is
(are)
________________?
Which
one
________________?
Who
was
_________________?
Why
did
_______________?
What
is
(are)
__________________?
When
did
__________________?
How
would
you
outline
__________________?
List
the
__________________
in
order.
Understanding-‐Comprehension
Understand
the
main
idea
of
material
heard,
viewed,
or
read.
Interpret
or
summarize
the
ideas
in
own
words.
The
teacher
should:
• Ask
questions
that
the
student
can
answer
in
his/her
own
words
by
stating
facts
or
by
identifying
the
main
idea.
• Give
tests
based
on
classroom
instruction
Question
prompts:
How
would
you
compare
____________?
Contrast
____________________?
How
would
you
clarify
the
meaning
________________?
How
would
you
differentiate
between
____________________?
How
would
you
generalize
__________________?
How
would
you
express
________________?
What
can
you
infer
from
____________________?
What
did
you
observe
________________?
How
would
you
identify
__________________?
How
can
you
describe
_____________?
Will
you
restate
________________?
Elaborate
on
_____________.
What
would
happen
if
________________?
What
is
the
main
idea
of
_________________?
What
can
you
say
about
_______________?
Anderson,
L.
W.,
&
Krathwohl,
D.
R.
(Eds.).
(2001).
A
taxonomy
for
learning,
teaching
and
assessing:
A
revision
of
Bloom's
Taxonomy
of
educational
outcomes:
Complete
edition,
New
York
:
Longman.
Anderson
&
Krathwohl,
2001
Anderson
&
Krathwohl,
2001
2.
Applying-‐Application
Apply
an
abstract
idea
in
a
concrete
situation
to
solve
a
problem
or
relate
it
to
prior
experience.
The
teacher
should:
• Provide
opportunities
for
the
student
to
use
ideas,
theories,
or
problem
solving
techniques
and
apply
them
to
new
situations.
• Review
the
student’s
work
to
ensure
that
he/she
is
using
problem
solving
techniques
independently.
• Provide
questions
that
require
the
student
to
define
and
solve
problems.
Questioning
prompts:
What
actions
would
you
take
to
perform
_________________?
How
would
you
develop
_____________
to
present
_______________?
What
other
way
would
you
choose
to
_______________?
What
would
the
result
be
if
________________?
How
would
you
demonstrate
____________________?
How
would
you
present
_________________?
How
would
you
change
_________________?
How
would
you
modify
_____________?
How
could
you
develop
__________________?
Why
does
_______________work?
How
would
you
alter
____________
to
______________?
What
examples
can
you
find
that
______________?
How
would
you
solve
_________________?
Analyzing
-‐
Analysis
Break
down
a
concept
or
idea
into
parts
and
show
relationships
among
the
parts.
The
teacher
should:
• Allow
time
for
students
to
examine
concepts
and
ideas
and
to
break
them
down
into
basic
parts.
• Require
students
to
explain
why
they
chose
a
certain
problem
solving
technique
and
why
the
solution
worked.
Questioning
prompts:
How
can
you
classify
_____________
according
to
______________?
How
can
you
compare
the
different
parts
_____________?
What
explanation
do
you
have
for
__________________?
How
is
_______________
connected
to
__________________?
Discuss
the
pros
and
cons
of
_________________.
How
can
you
sort
the
parts
________________?
What
is
the
analysis
of
_________________?
What
can
you
infer
_________________?
What
ideas
validate
______________________?
How
would
you
explain
____________________?
What
can
you
point
out
about
________________?
What
is
the
problem
with
_____________?
Why
do
you
think
_____________?
Anderson,
L.
W.,
&
Krathwohl,
D.
R.
(Eds.).
(2001).
A
taxonomy
for
learning,
teaching
and
assessing:
A
revision
of
Bloom's
Taxonomy
of
educational
outcomes:
Complete
edition,
New
York
:
Longman.
Anderson
&
Krathwohl,
2001
Anderson
&
Krathwohl,
2001
3. Evaluating-‐
Evaluation
Make
informed
judgments
about
the
value
of
ideas
or
materials.
Use
standards
and
criteria
to
support
opinions
and
views.
The
teacher
should:
• Provide
opportunities
for
students
to
make
judgments
based
on
appropriate
criteria.
• Have
students
demonstrate
that
they
can
judge,
critique,
or
interpret
processes,
materials,
methods,
etc.
using
standards
and
criteria.
Questioning
prompts:
What
criteria
would
you
use
to
assess
_______________?
What
data
was
used
to
evaluate
____________?
What
choice
would
you
have
made
_______________?
How
would
you
determine
the
facts
______________?
What
is
the
most
important
_____________?
What
would
you
suggest
____________?
How
would
you
grade
____________?
What
is
your
opinion
of
______________?
How
could
you
verify
______________?
What
information
would
you
use
to
prioritize
________________?
Rate
the
____________.
Rank
the
importance
of
______________.
Determine
the
value
of
______________.
Creating-‐Synthesis
Bring
together
parts
of
knowledge
to
form
a
whole
and
build
relationships
for
new
situations.
The
teacher
should:
• Provide
opportunities
for
students
to
assemble
parts
of
knowledge
into
a
whole
using
creative
thinking
and
problem
solving.
• Require
students
to
demonstrate
that
they
can
combine
concepts
to
build
new
ideas
for
new
situations.
Questioning
prompts:
What
alternative
would
you
suggest
for
______________?
What
changes
would
you
make
to
revise
__________________?
How
would
you
explain
the
reason
______________?
How
would
you
generate
a
plan
to
________________?
What
could
you
invent
______________?
What
facts
can
you
gather
________________?
Predict
the
outcome
if
_______________.
What
would
happen
if
_________________?
How
would
you
portray
______________?
Devise
a
way
to
_____________.
How
would
you
compile
the
facts
for
_____________?
How
would
you
elaborate
on
the
reason
________________?
How
would
you
improve
_____________?
Anderson,
L.
W.,
&
Krathwohl,
D.
R.
(Eds.).
(2001).
A
taxonomy
for
learning,
teaching
and
assessing:
A
revision
of
Bloom's
Taxonomy
of
educational
outcomes:
Complete
edition,
New
York
:
Longman.
Anderson
&
Krathwohl,
2001
Anderson
&
Krathwohl,
2001