Recently, in the previous week a study was conducted by a German antivirus company called AV-Test, according to which Bing produces five times more malware as compared to Google.

1. Bing blocks More Than 90% Click For Such Malicious Sites – Cover
Story on Search Engine Insights
Recently, in the previous week a study was conducted by a German antivirus
company called AV-Test, according to which Bing produces five times more
malware as compared to Google. Although Microsoft completely denies this study
and currently the Microsoft Company has also generated a rebuttal of AV-Test
study. Researchers on Bing claim that instead of performing the searches directly
on Bing.com an API was used to execute queries. This methodology is absolutely
supported by Microsoft and in accordance with its figures this procedure
bypassed Bing’s malware warning system.
The senior manager of Bing namely David Felstead said in reply to this study that,
defending the entire company from any embarrassment caused by the study,
saying that bing definitely avoids every customer from clicking on the infectious
malware sites by deactivating the whole link on its result page and also displaying
another message below after disabling the link, the purpose of the message is to
cease people from visiting such contagious web sites. He further told that
Microsoft does not remove any infectious sites from its main index, usually
because some are legally acceptable. He also added that the legitimate websites
do not host any malware, but they get hacked. So instead of blocking them up a
warning always shows up to resist users from clicking on malware containing inks.
While providing the reason for this endeavor by Microsoft, Felstead told that the
only reason why the contaminated websites show up on bing's index is because,
despite being contaminated a user always expects such sites to pop up on Bing's
search engine, in case if the websites would not appear, then this would only
negatively impact on the user that the Bing's search directory is incomplete.
Al in all he concluded the entire conversation on the note that Bing always
informs about the malware warnings to all the users for about 0.04 percent
searchers. Felsted also further added that the warning system under bing's

2. authority blocks approximately 94% of the clicks appearing from
malware containing websites.
Recently the competition amongst Bing and Google has escalated to
extremity. Felstead highlighted that it's impossible for any search engine to be
perfect enough to eradicate 100% of the malware from its directory. He also
placed an argument that the only reason why Microsoft shows
the malware warnings on the website link is to acknowledge the users via its
message that that specific website is contaminated, so that the person does not
go on Google and click on it because there can be possibility that google has not
detected that particular ink as corrupted