Billing & Payments
Engineering Meetup
June 18th, 2014
• Mathieu Chauvin – Netflix
Validating Payment Information
• Taylor Wicksell – Netflix
Flexible Billing Integrations Using Events
• Jean-Denis Greze – Dropbox
Mistakes (and Wins) Building Payments at Dropbox
• Anthony Zacharakis – Lumosity
Billing Migrations: Maintaining Your (Data) Sanity
• Alec Holmes – Square
Scaling Merchant Payouts at Square
=== Break ===
• Paul Huang – SurveyMonkey
Billing Globalization and Auto Renewal Optimization
• Emmanuel Cron – Google Wallet
Moving from SE to Host Card Emulation
• Feifeng Yang / Michael Chen – Electronic Arts
Ecommerce at EA
• Krishnan Sridhar – LinkedIn
Real-Time Analytics and Smart Routing
Validating Payment Information
Mathieu Chauvin
@matchauvin – linkedin/matchauvin
Signing-Up for Netflix
• Subscription Based
• 30 Days Free Trial
• Payment Information
Collection
• Pro Forma
• Luhn Check (Mod10)
• Card Type vs Card# RegEx
• Authorization / Reversal
Payment Validation 101
But Wait! You Can Do More!
Authorization Amount
• $0.00, $1.00, or Full Price Authorization
• Don’t Forget the Reversal!
• Constraints by Country or by Card Type
Response Types
• Hard Declines
• Soft Declines
MCC
• What is an MCC?
• Figure out the Best MCC Fit
BINs
• What is a BIN?
• Card Types: Credit, Debit, Prepaids
• What About Non-Reloadable Prepaid Cards?
Forking Traffic
• Do You Use Several Payment Processors?
• Why Don’t You Test Which One Performs
Better?
Use Cases
• Sign-Up
• Updating Payment Information
• Returning Customer
Country Specific Behavior
• Adapt To Your Market
The Feedback Loop
• A/B Tests
• Analyze, Project & Evaluate Risks
• Test Again
Conclusion
• Try Everything
• Build Your Application Dynamically
• The Feedback Loop!
Thank You!
Flexible Billing Integrations
Using Events
Taylor Wicksell
The Billing Team
• Signups/Cancellations
• Recurring Billing
• Price and Tax Calculations
• Discounts / Gifts
• Financial Reporting
Current Architecture
• Netflix Data Center
• Batch Processing and
Customer Requests
• Oracle (Single-Master)
• Data driven
Cloud Migration - Primary Goals
• Join Netflix in the Cloud
• High Availability
• Multi-Regional Active/Active
• Scalability
New Design
• Amazon EC2
• Multi-Regional
• Cassandra
• Event Driven
Order Flow
Cross-Cutting Concerns
• Publishing Data To Interested Parties
– Hold Messaging
– Financial Reporting
• Metrics/Analytics
• Velocity Checks
• Debugging
Wiretap to Common Event Pipeline
Common Event Pipeline
Current Implementation
• SQS Entry Point
• Custom routing service
• Custom code for each
endpoint integration
• Weak ordering of events
Future Implementation
• Suro / Kafka Entry Point
• Configurable Routing and
Transformation
• Pluggable endpoint
integration
• Option for strong ordering
of events
Sting – Broad Analytics
Druid – Event Aggregation Metrics
ElasticSearch – Event Level Debugging
Mistakes (and Wins) Building
Payments At Dropbox
Jean-Denis Grèze & Dan Wheeler
June 18th, 2014
Backend Tips
• Not about increasing conversion
• Not about pricing
• Not about plan and feature optimizations
• Not about upselling
• Not about consumer SaaS at scale
• Not about self-serve in
SMB/SME/Enterprise
Pains of Scaling Payments
• Thousands of customers to millions of
customers
• SMB to Enterprise
– Custom flows!
• International expansion
– Fraud
– New payment methods (delayed settlements)
– Different price points
Out Of The Dark Ages
• For a long time, only 0.5 engineers
worked on payments and billing
• March 2013: consult w/ leading payment
engineers, PMs and executives on how to
build an amazing payments team
– 15+ in 1 year
Advice
• Build a payments + billing backend that is:
– Flexible
• Migrations (sadface)
• Requirements will change – often
– Auditable
• Always know why and state changed
– Append Only
• Never lose data
Team Ca$h
Team Ca$h
• Engineers
– Some finance background
– A lot of systems/analytics background
• PMs
– Some finance/accounting background
– Some product/marketing background
• Advisors
– Payments experts
– Tight feedback loop w/ finance
• Designers
Migrations
Migrations
• You will have to migrate
– 3rd-party vaulting to self vaulting
– New markets = new processors
– If you are a growing company, your internals will require
migrations
• Stakes are high
– Double-billing? Forgetting to charge some users?
Inadvertently moving users from one pricing category to
another?
• Old way:
– Ad hoc
– Tons of tests
I. Leverage Existing Code:
Equivalence
• Write equivalence between old and new
implementations (database, API, 3rd party
providers, tests, etc.)
• Run everything through both systems at
once, with equivalence being tested
• Every step of the way check that equivalence
relations hold (e.g., old-style invoice has a
new-style invoice equivalent)
• Turn off old system when everything works
for X amount of time
Migration Pro-Tip
• If you can migrate in both directions at
will on a per-endpoint basis, your life
will be awesome and people will love you.
Moneytree
Logging
• Dark Ages = tons of logging
• Very comprehensive, but ad-hoc = too
much effort to re-create state
• Human error
II. Automated Logging
• Automatically log
– Any DB write (graph, relational, etc.)
– Any 3rd party API call (and some internal calls like
email)
• Pre-log
– Any incoming 3rd party payload
• Can recreate past actions if we introduced a
regression
• LOG A REASON (and code version)
– 1 year is a long time
Automated Logging
=
Time Machine
Not too much data
• Dropbox = large scale for SaaS
• Hundreds of millions of users
(provisioning is hard)
• Tons of data, but still payments data <<
file storage data
– Although we do have the benefits of amazing
infrastructure
III. States, Not Deltas
• Generally # states << # deltas
• States
– Pro 100 + Packrat
– DfB + Harmony Enabled
• Deltas
– Add 5 licenses, 6 licenses, etc.
– Add 20 licenses and switch from monthly to yearly
• Use states and let the system figure out how
to get from start to end
IV. Possibility & Transitions Use
Same Code Paths
• No difference between:
– entity.is_valid_transition(end_state)
– entity.perform_transition(end_state)
• Except that writes are turned off for the
former.
• No change for “is something possible”
logic to be different than “do the thing”
logic.
States Are Nice
transition_space = MoneytreeTransitionsSpace.build_cross_product(
entity=me,
gateways=ALL_GATEWAYS,
plans=[Pro100, Pro200, Pro500, DfB, DfBTrial],
schedules=[Monthly, Yearly],
currencies=ALL_CURRENCIES,
features=ALL_FEATURES,
tax_profile=[NoTax, SimpleTax, ComplexTax],
)
# …
If transition_space.supports(FEATURE_PACKRAT):
# …
Write Protection
• Seems dumb, but need to be careful not
to accidentally change values in payments
world. Have clearly-defined code paths
that can touch state, talk to 3rd party
components, etc.
V. One More Lesson
• Payments + Billing != Finance
• Business requirements don’t always
translate to what’s best/easiest in the
world of accounting. You need to flexibly
work in both worlds – can’t risk the user
experience to make your finance dep’t
happy (and vice-versa)
• Get a great PM
VI. Why Payments Are Cool?
• Infrastructure?
– Payments service
– Provisioning service
• Product?
– Upsells? (+50% increase in revenue per user)
– Gating features?
• Product Infrastructure!
– Build a successful structure by emphasizing
hard problems in both worlds!
Now + The Future
• Other Cool Projects
– ML for risk/anomaly detection (e.g., for payment
methods that don’t settle immediately)
– Price AB testing (*)
– Cross-platform upsell framework
• Questions?
– dan@dropbox.com
– jeandenis@dropbox.com
• Hiring
– Get in touch!
Team Ca$h
Lumos Labs, Inc.
Data Sanity
A short treatise on
rebuilding a payment system
Lumos Labs, Inc.
the background
Lumos Labs, Inc.
Circa 2012
Decided to rewrite our payment system
Lumos Labs, Inc.
Reasons
Old payment system has a lot of
limitations
Lumos Labs, Inc.
Payment system limitations
• Hard to add additional gateways
• Models don’t reflect business reality
• Not built for reporting
• Code is brittle
Lumos Labs, Inc.
3 months later…
Lumos Labs, Inc.
New payment system features
• Trivial to add new payment methods
• Subscriptions are the core model
• Built with reporting in mind
• Separate, well encapsulated library
Lumos Labs, Inc.
Works like a charm!
Lumos Labs, Inc.
wait… just one problem
Lumos Labs, Inc.
Having two parallel
payment systems is not
sustainable
Surprise!
As it turns out
Lumos Labs, Inc.
Just deprecate the old one
Lumos Labs, Inc.
Just deprecate the old one
• Don't migrate anyone, let old users
churn out naturally (will take forever)
Lumos Labs, Inc.
Just deprecate the old one
• Don't migrate anyone, let old users
churn out naturally (will take forever)
• Migrate everyone, but only most
critical/current subscription info
(loses history)
Lumos Labs, Inc.
Just deprecate the old one
• Don't migrate anyone, let old users
churn out naturally (will take forever)
• Migrate everyone, but only most
critical/current subscription info
(loses history)
• Migrate everyone + full history
(tricky, lots of edge cases)
Lumos Labs, Inc.
so, what’d we
choose?
(drum roll)
Lumos Labs, Inc.
We decided to migrate
everyone and their entire
billing history
Lumos Labs, Inc.
Why?
One system
One history
One source of truth
Lumos Labs, Inc.
Lumos Labs, Inc.
enter the
sanity check
Lumos Labs, Inc.
enter the
sanity check
Just make a sanity check before and
after the migration to ask questions
Lumos Labs, Inc.
enter the
sanity check
Both models should answer certain
questions the same way, e.g:
• How much did the user pay for a subscription?
• How many total transactions did the user make?
• Was auto-renewal enabled on X date?
Lumos Labs, Inc.
class SanityCheck
Methods = [:subscriber?, :transaction_count] # etc.
def initialize(record)
@record = record
@before_values = SanityCheck.values(record)
end
def self.values(record)
Methods.map { |m| [m, record.send(m)] }.to_h
end
end
enter the
sanity check
Lumos Labs, Inc.
class SanityCheck
...
def check
@after_values = SanityCheck.values(record)
@diff = diff(@before_values, @after_values)
end
def diff(a, b)
a.delete_if { |k, v| b[k] == v }
.merge!(b.dup.delete_if { |k, v| a.has_key?(k) })
end
end
enter the
sanity check
Lumos Labs, Inc.
enter the
sanity check
User.each do |user|
sanity_check = SanityCheck.new(user)
user.migrate!
sanity_check.check
if sanity_check.diff.any?
# sanity check failed -- log an error, rollback, etc.
raise ActiveRecord::Rollback
else
# woo hoo, success!
user.update_attributes(:migrated => true)
end
end
config/initializers/user_auth.rb
Lumos Labs, Inc.
the result
Lumos Labs, Inc.
A resounding success!
the result
Lumos Labs, Inc.
(Mostly)
the result
Lumos Labs, Inc.
Did not work in all cases
● Payment system behavior changed over
time
Lumos Labs, Inc.
Did not work in all cases
● Payment system behavior changed over
time
● Some concepts did not map between
systems
Lumos Labs, Inc.
Handling the edge cases
● Replayed history as it would play out in
the new system
● Still kept most critical information the
same (e.g. transaction timestamps)
Lumos Labs, Inc.
Skip ahead to today
Migrated 99.9994%* of all our users
successfully to the new system
*The remaining .0006% live on for business, not technical reasons
Lumos Labs, Inc.
Thanks
Anthony Zacharakis
anthony@lumoslabs.com
@azacharax
Scaling Merchant Payouts at
Square
Alec Holmes
‣ Infrastructure team that moves money
‣ Card processing (money in)
‣ Settlements (money out)
Payments Team
‣ Monolithic Rails app
‣ Database storage and IO limits
‣ Controls around accounting data
Disaster Ahead
Monorail
Database
Payments Bills
Deposits
Where We Started
Ledger
Database
Payments Bills
Deposits
Monorail
Database
API
Current System
Challenge:
Migrating Live
Data
‣ Stricter money-moving event model
‣ Same event streams to all systems
‣ Smart queueing of events
Challenge:
Moving to APIs
‣ Replace direct data access with API calls
‣ Hadoop for analytics queries
That's it. All pennies accounted fo
Billing Globalization and Auto-
Renewal Optimization
• Paul Huang
• Engineering Manager
• SurveyMonkey
• June 18th, 2014
Our mission is to help people make
better decisions
We help people get answers to their questions
customers create surveys distribute to others recipients respond customers analyze
and gain insight
Our customers have invented many ways to use our tool
98
90MUnique visitors
every month
17K
New sign-ups daily
“SurveyMonkey turns online
surveys into a hot business.”
“ Start-up companies using
‘freemium’ business models,
including SurveyMonkey,
are thriving as the cost of
computer power and storage
falls.”
One of the hottest
startups to watch.
2.4MSurvey responses
are generated daily
SurveyMonkey is the world’s largest survey company
Billing Globalization
In 2010...
Currencies:1 currency (USD).
Payment Methods: Credit Card, Invoice.
Pricing: one price per package.
Revenue: $ MM
Billing Globalization
In 2014...
Currencies: 39 international currencies.
Payment Methods: Credit Card, PayPal, Debit Card, Bank Transfer, iTunes, Invoice.
Pricing: each package with different price per currency, multiple prices allowed for
price testing.
Revenue: $$$$ MM
Auto-Renewal Optimization
Retry Logic: retry failed payments at different intervals, ~60% retry success rate
Account Updater: get users’ updated credit card data (number / expiration date)
before next renewal date, ~4% users at 96% success rate
Immediate Renewal: charge pending invoices when users update payment accounts,
~4% retry success rate improvement
The
Road
Ahead
Upcoming Billing Projects in 2014
VAT 2015: preparations for VAT rule changes in Europe in 2015
Brazil Payment Processing: set up local entity, integrate with a new Payment Service
Provider in Brazil
Continue Improving Retry Logic: increase retry frequencies
The End (BTW, we’re hiring…)
112
* Jun 1st to Oct 17th

6/18/14 Billing & Payments Engineering Meetup I

  • 1.
    Billing & Payments EngineeringMeetup June 18th, 2014
  • 2.
    • Mathieu Chauvin– Netflix Validating Payment Information • Taylor Wicksell – Netflix Flexible Billing Integrations Using Events • Jean-Denis Greze – Dropbox Mistakes (and Wins) Building Payments at Dropbox • Anthony Zacharakis – Lumosity Billing Migrations: Maintaining Your (Data) Sanity • Alec Holmes – Square Scaling Merchant Payouts at Square === Break === • Paul Huang – SurveyMonkey Billing Globalization and Auto Renewal Optimization • Emmanuel Cron – Google Wallet Moving from SE to Host Card Emulation • Feifeng Yang / Michael Chen – Electronic Arts Ecommerce at EA • Krishnan Sridhar – LinkedIn Real-Time Analytics and Smart Routing
  • 3.
    Validating Payment Information MathieuChauvin @matchauvin – linkedin/matchauvin
  • 4.
    Signing-Up for Netflix •Subscription Based • 30 Days Free Trial • Payment Information Collection
  • 5.
    • Pro Forma •Luhn Check (Mod10) • Card Type vs Card# RegEx • Authorization / Reversal Payment Validation 101
  • 6.
    But Wait! YouCan Do More!
  • 7.
    Authorization Amount • $0.00,$1.00, or Full Price Authorization • Don’t Forget the Reversal! • Constraints by Country or by Card Type
  • 8.
    Response Types • HardDeclines • Soft Declines
  • 9.
    MCC • What isan MCC? • Figure out the Best MCC Fit
  • 10.
    BINs • What isa BIN? • Card Types: Credit, Debit, Prepaids • What About Non-Reloadable Prepaid Cards?
  • 11.
    Forking Traffic • DoYou Use Several Payment Processors? • Why Don’t You Test Which One Performs Better?
  • 12.
    Use Cases • Sign-Up •Updating Payment Information • Returning Customer
  • 13.
    Country Specific Behavior •Adapt To Your Market
  • 14.
    The Feedback Loop •A/B Tests • Analyze, Project & Evaluate Risks • Test Again
  • 15.
    Conclusion • Try Everything •Build Your Application Dynamically • The Feedback Loop! Thank You!
  • 16.
  • 17.
    The Billing Team •Signups/Cancellations • Recurring Billing • Price and Tax Calculations • Discounts / Gifts • Financial Reporting
  • 18.
    Current Architecture • NetflixData Center • Batch Processing and Customer Requests • Oracle (Single-Master) • Data driven
  • 19.
    Cloud Migration -Primary Goals • Join Netflix in the Cloud • High Availability • Multi-Regional Active/Active • Scalability
  • 20.
    New Design • AmazonEC2 • Multi-Regional • Cassandra • Event Driven
  • 21.
  • 22.
    Cross-Cutting Concerns • PublishingData To Interested Parties – Hold Messaging – Financial Reporting • Metrics/Analytics • Velocity Checks • Debugging
  • 23.
    Wiretap to CommonEvent Pipeline
  • 24.
    Common Event Pipeline CurrentImplementation • SQS Entry Point • Custom routing service • Custom code for each endpoint integration • Weak ordering of events Future Implementation • Suro / Kafka Entry Point • Configurable Routing and Transformation • Pluggable endpoint integration • Option for strong ordering of events
  • 26.
    Sting – BroadAnalytics
  • 27.
    Druid – EventAggregation Metrics
  • 28.
    ElasticSearch – EventLevel Debugging
  • 29.
    Mistakes (and Wins)Building Payments At Dropbox Jean-Denis Grèze & Dan Wheeler June 18th, 2014
  • 30.
    Backend Tips • Notabout increasing conversion • Not about pricing • Not about plan and feature optimizations • Not about upselling • Not about consumer SaaS at scale • Not about self-serve in SMB/SME/Enterprise
  • 31.
    Pains of ScalingPayments • Thousands of customers to millions of customers • SMB to Enterprise – Custom flows! • International expansion – Fraud – New payment methods (delayed settlements) – Different price points
  • 32.
    Out Of TheDark Ages • For a long time, only 0.5 engineers worked on payments and billing • March 2013: consult w/ leading payment engineers, PMs and executives on how to build an amazing payments team – 15+ in 1 year
  • 33.
    Advice • Build apayments + billing backend that is: – Flexible • Migrations (sadface) • Requirements will change – often – Auditable • Always know why and state changed – Append Only • Never lose data
  • 34.
  • 35.
    Team Ca$h • Engineers –Some finance background – A lot of systems/analytics background • PMs – Some finance/accounting background – Some product/marketing background • Advisors – Payments experts – Tight feedback loop w/ finance • Designers
  • 36.
  • 37.
    Migrations • You willhave to migrate – 3rd-party vaulting to self vaulting – New markets = new processors – If you are a growing company, your internals will require migrations • Stakes are high – Double-billing? Forgetting to charge some users? Inadvertently moving users from one pricing category to another? • Old way: – Ad hoc – Tons of tests
  • 38.
    I. Leverage ExistingCode: Equivalence • Write equivalence between old and new implementations (database, API, 3rd party providers, tests, etc.) • Run everything through both systems at once, with equivalence being tested • Every step of the way check that equivalence relations hold (e.g., old-style invoice has a new-style invoice equivalent) • Turn off old system when everything works for X amount of time
  • 39.
    Migration Pro-Tip • Ifyou can migrate in both directions at will on a per-endpoint basis, your life will be awesome and people will love you.
  • 40.
  • 41.
    Logging • Dark Ages= tons of logging • Very comprehensive, but ad-hoc = too much effort to re-create state • Human error
  • 42.
    II. Automated Logging •Automatically log – Any DB write (graph, relational, etc.) – Any 3rd party API call (and some internal calls like email) • Pre-log – Any incoming 3rd party payload • Can recreate past actions if we introduced a regression • LOG A REASON (and code version) – 1 year is a long time
  • 43.
  • 44.
    Not too muchdata • Dropbox = large scale for SaaS • Hundreds of millions of users (provisioning is hard) • Tons of data, but still payments data << file storage data – Although we do have the benefits of amazing infrastructure
  • 45.
    III. States, NotDeltas • Generally # states << # deltas • States – Pro 100 + Packrat – DfB + Harmony Enabled • Deltas – Add 5 licenses, 6 licenses, etc. – Add 20 licenses and switch from monthly to yearly • Use states and let the system figure out how to get from start to end
  • 46.
    IV. Possibility &Transitions Use Same Code Paths • No difference between: – entity.is_valid_transition(end_state) – entity.perform_transition(end_state) • Except that writes are turned off for the former. • No change for “is something possible” logic to be different than “do the thing” logic.
  • 47.
    States Are Nice transition_space= MoneytreeTransitionsSpace.build_cross_product( entity=me, gateways=ALL_GATEWAYS, plans=[Pro100, Pro200, Pro500, DfB, DfBTrial], schedules=[Monthly, Yearly], currencies=ALL_CURRENCIES, features=ALL_FEATURES, tax_profile=[NoTax, SimpleTax, ComplexTax], ) # … If transition_space.supports(FEATURE_PACKRAT): # …
  • 48.
    Write Protection • Seemsdumb, but need to be careful not to accidentally change values in payments world. Have clearly-defined code paths that can touch state, talk to 3rd party components, etc.
  • 49.
    V. One MoreLesson • Payments + Billing != Finance • Business requirements don’t always translate to what’s best/easiest in the world of accounting. You need to flexibly work in both worlds – can’t risk the user experience to make your finance dep’t happy (and vice-versa) • Get a great PM
  • 50.
    VI. Why PaymentsAre Cool? • Infrastructure? – Payments service – Provisioning service • Product? – Upsells? (+50% increase in revenue per user) – Gating features? • Product Infrastructure! – Build a successful structure by emphasizing hard problems in both worlds!
  • 52.
    Now + TheFuture • Other Cool Projects – ML for risk/anomaly detection (e.g., for payment methods that don’t settle immediately) – Price AB testing (*) – Cross-platform upsell framework • Questions? – dan@dropbox.com – jeandenis@dropbox.com • Hiring – Get in touch!
  • 53.
  • 54.
    Lumos Labs, Inc. DataSanity A short treatise on rebuilding a payment system
  • 55.
  • 56.
    Lumos Labs, Inc. Circa2012 Decided to rewrite our payment system
  • 57.
    Lumos Labs, Inc. Reasons Oldpayment system has a lot of limitations
  • 58.
    Lumos Labs, Inc. Paymentsystem limitations • Hard to add additional gateways • Models don’t reflect business reality • Not built for reporting • Code is brittle
  • 59.
    Lumos Labs, Inc. 3months later…
  • 60.
    Lumos Labs, Inc. Newpayment system features • Trivial to add new payment methods • Subscriptions are the core model • Built with reporting in mind • Separate, well encapsulated library
  • 61.
  • 62.
    Lumos Labs, Inc. wait…just one problem
  • 63.
    Lumos Labs, Inc. Havingtwo parallel payment systems is not sustainable Surprise! As it turns out
  • 64.
    Lumos Labs, Inc. Justdeprecate the old one
  • 65.
    Lumos Labs, Inc. Justdeprecate the old one • Don't migrate anyone, let old users churn out naturally (will take forever)
  • 66.
    Lumos Labs, Inc. Justdeprecate the old one • Don't migrate anyone, let old users churn out naturally (will take forever) • Migrate everyone, but only most critical/current subscription info (loses history)
  • 67.
    Lumos Labs, Inc. Justdeprecate the old one • Don't migrate anyone, let old users churn out naturally (will take forever) • Migrate everyone, but only most critical/current subscription info (loses history) • Migrate everyone + full history (tricky, lots of edge cases)
  • 68.
    Lumos Labs, Inc. so,what’d we choose? (drum roll)
  • 69.
    Lumos Labs, Inc. Wedecided to migrate everyone and their entire billing history
  • 70.
    Lumos Labs, Inc. Why? Onesystem One history One source of truth
  • 71.
  • 72.
    Lumos Labs, Inc. enterthe sanity check
  • 73.
    Lumos Labs, Inc. enterthe sanity check Just make a sanity check before and after the migration to ask questions
  • 74.
    Lumos Labs, Inc. enterthe sanity check Both models should answer certain questions the same way, e.g: • How much did the user pay for a subscription? • How many total transactions did the user make? • Was auto-renewal enabled on X date?
  • 75.
    Lumos Labs, Inc. classSanityCheck Methods = [:subscriber?, :transaction_count] # etc. def initialize(record) @record = record @before_values = SanityCheck.values(record) end def self.values(record) Methods.map { |m| [m, record.send(m)] }.to_h end end enter the sanity check
  • 76.
    Lumos Labs, Inc. classSanityCheck ... def check @after_values = SanityCheck.values(record) @diff = diff(@before_values, @after_values) end def diff(a, b) a.delete_if { |k, v| b[k] == v } .merge!(b.dup.delete_if { |k, v| a.has_key?(k) }) end end enter the sanity check
  • 77.
    Lumos Labs, Inc. enterthe sanity check User.each do |user| sanity_check = SanityCheck.new(user) user.migrate! sanity_check.check if sanity_check.diff.any? # sanity check failed -- log an error, rollback, etc. raise ActiveRecord::Rollback else # woo hoo, success! user.update_attributes(:migrated => true) end end config/initializers/user_auth.rb
  • 78.
  • 79.
    Lumos Labs, Inc. Aresounding success! the result
  • 80.
  • 81.
    Lumos Labs, Inc. Didnot work in all cases ● Payment system behavior changed over time
  • 82.
    Lumos Labs, Inc. Didnot work in all cases ● Payment system behavior changed over time ● Some concepts did not map between systems
  • 83.
    Lumos Labs, Inc. Handlingthe edge cases ● Replayed history as it would play out in the new system ● Still kept most critical information the same (e.g. transaction timestamps)
  • 84.
    Lumos Labs, Inc. Skipahead to today Migrated 99.9994%* of all our users successfully to the new system *The remaining .0006% live on for business, not technical reasons
  • 85.
    Lumos Labs, Inc. Thanks AnthonyZacharakis anthony@lumoslabs.com @azacharax
  • 86.
    Scaling Merchant Payoutsat Square Alec Holmes
  • 87.
    ‣ Infrastructure teamthat moves money ‣ Card processing (money in) ‣ Settlements (money out) Payments Team
  • 88.
    ‣ Monolithic Railsapp ‣ Database storage and IO limits ‣ Controls around accounting data Disaster Ahead
  • 89.
  • 90.
  • 91.
    Challenge: Migrating Live Data ‣ Strictermoney-moving event model ‣ Same event streams to all systems ‣ Smart queueing of events
  • 92.
    Challenge: Moving to APIs ‣Replace direct data access with API calls ‣ Hadoop for analytics queries
  • 93.
    That's it. Allpennies accounted fo
  • 95.
    Billing Globalization andAuto- Renewal Optimization • Paul Huang • Engineering Manager • SurveyMonkey • June 18th, 2014
  • 96.
    Our mission isto help people make better decisions
  • 97.
    We help peopleget answers to their questions customers create surveys distribute to others recipients respond customers analyze and gain insight
  • 98.
    Our customers haveinvented many ways to use our tool 98
  • 99.
    90MUnique visitors every month 17K Newsign-ups daily “SurveyMonkey turns online surveys into a hot business.” “ Start-up companies using ‘freemium’ business models, including SurveyMonkey, are thriving as the cost of computer power and storage falls.” One of the hottest startups to watch. 2.4MSurvey responses are generated daily SurveyMonkey is the world’s largest survey company
  • 100.
    Billing Globalization In 2010... Currencies:1currency (USD). Payment Methods: Credit Card, Invoice. Pricing: one price per package. Revenue: $ MM
  • 101.
    Billing Globalization In 2014... Currencies:39 international currencies. Payment Methods: Credit Card, PayPal, Debit Card, Bank Transfer, iTunes, Invoice. Pricing: each package with different price per currency, multiple prices allowed for price testing. Revenue: $$$$ MM
  • 102.
    Auto-Renewal Optimization Retry Logic:retry failed payments at different intervals, ~60% retry success rate Account Updater: get users’ updated credit card data (number / expiration date) before next renewal date, ~4% users at 96% success rate Immediate Renewal: charge pending invoices when users update payment accounts, ~4% retry success rate improvement
  • 103.
  • 104.
    Upcoming Billing Projectsin 2014 VAT 2015: preparations for VAT rule changes in Europe in 2015 Brazil Payment Processing: set up local entity, integrate with a new Payment Service Provider in Brazil Continue Improving Retry Logic: increase retry frequencies
  • 105.
    The End (BTW,we’re hiring…)
  • 112.
    112 * Jun 1stto Oct 17th

Editor's Notes

  • #43 Fairly straight-forward to implement