SlideShare a Scribd company logo
Jeffrey Hartranft
Bureau of Waterways Engineering and Wetlands
Division of Wetlands Encroachment and Training
jhartranft@pa.gov; 717-772-5320
Big Spring Run Restoration Project
Background & Monitoring Results
Department of Environmental Protection
Pennsylvania
Pennsylvania Legacy Sediment Workgroup
1
2
• Ecological restoration principles applied to
legacy sediment impairments
• Big Spring Run test case and monitoring
• Geomorphology/physical results
• Water quality/chemical results
• Living resources/biological results
• Cost-effectiveness analysis
Presentation Outline
Modified from Jacobson and Coleman, 1986 after Walter and Merritts, 2008
3
Legacy sediment
Breached dam
Very recent inset point bar
Breached dam
Walter and Merritts, 2008 4
•Intended for use by a wide variety of organizations and
people
•Specific to aquatic ecosystem restoration projects
•Focused on scientific and technical issues
US Environmental Protection Agency Washington, DC. 2000.
http://www.epa.gov/owow/wetlands/restore/
5
Principles for the Ecological Restoration of Aquatic
Resources (EPA841-F-00-003)
• Restoration can be a complex undertaking that integrates a
wide range of disciplines
• Universities, government agencies, and private organizations
may be able to provide useful information and expertise
• Complex projects require effective leadership to bring
viewpoints, disciplines and styles together as a functional
team
6
Principles for the Ecological Restoration of Aquatic Resources (EPA841-F-00-003)
Involve multi-disciplinary skills and insights
Big Spring Run Legacy Sediment Removal and Aquatic Ecosystem
Restoration Project
• A multidisciplinary team planned, designed, constructed and monitored this restoration
project beginning in 2008 through 2019
• Team members included a wide range of scientific and technical disciplines
• Project sponsors included governments, academic institutions, non-profits, landowners
and other private entities
7
8
Principles for the Ecological Restoration of Aquatic Resources (EPA841-F-00-003)
• Before, during, and after project monitoring is used to
evaluate goal and objective achievement
• Continuous at Big Spring Run from 2008 through 2019
• Data gathered may be useful for model development and
predicting results when scaling up in size
1. developing and defining a new BMP
2. estimating nutrient reductions
3. cost-effectiveness analysis
Monitor
Courtesy Franklin & Marshall College
9
Courtesy Franklin & Marshall College 10
76°13'30"W
76°13'30"W
76°14'0"W
76°14'0"W
76°14'30"W
76°14'30"W
76°15'0"W
76°15'0"W
76°15'30"W
76°15'30"W
76°16'0"W
76°16'0"W
76°16'30"W
76°16'30"W
76°17'0"W
76°17'0"W
40°0'30"N
40°0'30"N
40°0'0"N
40°0'0"N
39°59'30"N
39°59'30"N
39°59'0"N
39°59'0"N
39°58'30"N
39°58'30"N
0 1,500 3,000 4,500 6,000
ft
Walter, et al., 2013 PADEP Report
Big Spring Run Watershed Hillshade Elevations
Confluence of Big Spring Run
and Mill Creek
Restoration Site
NCALM Lidar
11
The ratio of restoration area to drainage area < 0.5%
0.02 km2
Restoration Area
4.36 km2
Drainage Area
12
2013 NAIP Imagery
Watershed and Restoration Area
13
Principles for the Ecological Restoration of Aquatic Resources (EPA841-F-00-003)
• Restoration efforts are likely to fail if the sources of
degradation persist.
• Understanding an ecosystem’s evolutionary trajectory is
relevant to correctly diagnosing the problem, as well as
to developing restoration approaches that are
sustainable.
“… understanding the legacy sediment problem is the
first step in proposing a fix.”
Bay Journal, March, 2007. Alliance for the Chesapeake Bay.
Address ongoing causes of degradation.
Pre-restoration sediment source identification by landscape position using 137Cs
activity in Big Spring Run
14Walter et. al., 2017; Bai 2017 (Franklin & Marshall College Thesis)
0.0E+00
2.0E-03
4.0E-03
6.0E-03
8.0E-03
1.0E-02
1.2E-02
137CsActivity(Bq/g)
BSR 137CsActivityby Landscape Position
Stream Bank
Profile
Stream Bank
Aggregate
Upland Agricultural Soils
Suspended
Sediment
Tile Pads
Conclusion:
137Cs radiotopic isotopes from pre-restoration suspended sediment and tile pad deposition
are consistent with a sediment source entirely from stream bank erosion
Big Spring Run
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
-0.002 0.000 0.002 0.004 0.006 0.008
137
Cs (Bq/g)
Depth(cm)
Aggregate
Activity ~ 1.0 x
10-3 Bq/g.
Stream Bank
Profile
15
Principles for the Ecological Restoration of Aquatic Resources (EPA841-F-00-003)
• Identifying natural reference conditions are essential to
ensure project success.
• Channels incised through legacy sediment, are not natural
analogs in the mid-Atlantic Region (Walter and Merritts, 2008).
• Use historic information on altered sites.
Utilize a reference condition
Basal Gravels/Bedrock
Hydric Soil ~ 12-18 inches
Photos Courtesy Franklin & Marshall College
Big Spring Run In-situ Reference Condition
Legacy Sediment
16
Typical Legacy Sediment and Eroding Streambank
Stratigraphy - West Branch Little Conestoga River
Munsell Soil Colors
Basal Gravels/Bedrock
10YR 2/2 – Organic Rich Layer
10YR 3/1 – Organic Rich Layer
10Y 4/2 – Thin Gleyed Layer
10YR 5/4 – Legacy Sediment
Hydric/Wetland Soils
17
Adapted from Hilgartner et. al. 2012
Big Spring Run Carbon-14 Dates and Vascular Plant
Seed Macrofossil Analysis
0
cm
170
cm3000 BP
2860 BP
270 BP
seed macrofossil sample
column
72
cm
160
cm
All Dates +/- 40
120
cm
18
from Merritts, et. al. 2012
19
20
Principles for the Ecological Restoration of Aquatic Resources (EPA841-F-00-003)
• Natural valley morphology
• Address legacy sediment storage and erosion
• Ecosystem physical characteristics are essential to both
form and process restoration
• Natural function and natural structure are closely linked
to produce successful restoration processes.
Restore natural structure
Restore natural function
Proposed Restoration
Conceptual Design Adapted from LandStudies, Inc.
Typical Existing Conditions
Legacy Sediment Removal and Aquatic Ecosystem
Restoration Best Management Practice
21
Flood Flow
Legacy Sediment
Bedrock
Gravel
Hydric Paleosol
Modern, inset bar
Base FlowHydric Paleosol
Bedrock
Gravel
Root Zone
Flood Flow
Base Flow/Stage 0
Hydric Soil
Rapid aggradationLegacy sediment removal and
aquatic ecosystem restoration
Legacy Sediment
bedrock
gravels
hydric paleosols
inset bar
Legacy Sediment
Stage 5
Big Spring Run Type Cross Section
Slow
Aggradation
Dominant
Processes
Anastomosing channel – Stage 0
slow aggradation processes
bedrock
gravel
hydric soil hydric soil
Natural Wetland Soils
Bedrock
gravel
bedrock
“Stage Dam”
Cyclical stream evolution model and restoration linked to habitat and
ecosystem functions and services
Adapted from Cluer and Thorne, 2013
22
Artist rendition of restored conditions
23
October 2011
24
Courtesy Franklin & Marshall College
25
October 2011
Typical Existing Conditions
9/13/2011
Restoration
9/23/201107/27/2012
26
Big Spring Run Geomorphic Results
Big Spring Run As-Built - Hillshade Elevations
Legacy Sediment Excavation Limits
Legacy Sediment Temporary Stockpiles
Courtesy Franklin & Marshall College
construction limits
High : 359.62 feet
Low : 305.39 feet
4.7 Acre Restoration Area
27
Pre-Restoration Flow Model
Post-Restoration Flow Model
Art Parola, Univ. Louisville
Dorothy Merritts, F&M
Abandoned
Oxbows
28
For video link see: http://www.bsrproject.org/visualizations.html
29
Instantaneous storm flow conditions
Key Observations:
(1) In the restored
condition floodwater
goes over bank more
frequently, at lower
flow, and over a
greater area.
(2) Shear stresses are
much lower.
Big Spring Run As-Built
30
Courtesy Franklin & Marshall College
construction limits
High : 359.62 feet
Low : 305.39 feet
Flood Photo
Location and
Orientation
31
Big Spring Run post-restoration storm
Courtesy Telemonitor, Inc.
September 18, 2012 @ 3:30 PM
32
Courtesy Telemonitor, Inc.
September 18, 2012 @ 4:00 PM
Big Spring Run post-restoration storm
33
Courtesy Telemonitor, Inc.
September 18, 2012 @ 4:30 PM
Big Spring Run post-restoration storm
34
Courtesy Telemonitor, Inc.
September 18, 2012 @ 4:35 PM
Big Spring Run post-restoration storm
35
Courtesy Telemonitor, Inc.
September 18, 2012 @ 4:45 PM
Big Spring Run post-restoration storm
36
Courtesy Telemonitor, Inc.
September 18, 2012 @ 5:00 PM
Big Spring Run post-restoration storm
37
Courtesy Telemonitor, Inc.
September 18, 2012 @ 7:15 PM
Big Spring Run post-restoration storm
Courtesy Telemonitor, Inc.
September 18, 2012 @ 8:30 PM
Big Spring Run post-restoration storm
38
September 19, 2012 @ 10:00 AM
Courtesy Telemonitor, Inc.
39
Big Spring Run post-restoration storm
Post-restoration repeat cross section surveys, 2013-2017
Pre-restoration legacy
sediment surface
40
Deposition (blue), erosion (orange), and net change (aggradation) for seven
cross sections surveyed at least twice between 2012-13 and 2015-17.
Ft/yr
Ft/yr
DownstreamPost-restoration repeat cross section survey locations
41
Post-restoration terrestrial laser survey April 11, 2014
42
Surface water
43
Post-restoration UAV (drone) image of anastomosing channel form
April 22, 2018
Approximate area of view next terrestrial laser survey image
44
Post-restoration terrestrial laser survey
April 11, 2014
• Small, anastomosing channels were well established by April 2014 - 3 years
after restoration.
• Terrestrial laser surveys confirmed that the wetland-floodplain surface
remained stable from April 2014 through April 2016 and little change in
ground elevation has occurred (i.e., erosion is minimal).
• Fine sediment (silt size) deposition is occurring within the restoration area
over time, but it is localized, mostly along channel edges, and on the order
a few centimeters.
• Springs that were daylighted when legacy sediment was removed became
pools of water connecting small channels that were well established by
April 2014.
45
Summary of post-restoration geomorphic monitoring
U.S. Department of the Interior
U.S. Geological Survey
U.S. Geological Survey
Pennsylvania Water Science Center
This information is preliminary and is subject to revision. It is being provided
to meet the need for timely best science. The information is provided on the
condition that neither the U.S. Geological Survey nor the U.S. Government
shall be held liable for any damages resulting from the authorized or
unauthorized use of the information.
Effects of legacy-sediment removal on
nutrients and sediment in Big Spring Run,
Lancaster County, Pennsylvania, 2009-15
In cooperation with the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection
and in collaboration with Franklin and Marshall College and the U. S.
Environmental Protection Agency
46
USGS Sample Sites
Stream gage locations Flow direction 47
Preliminary Information-Subject to Revision. Not for Citation or Distribution.
Surface Water Pre- and post- restoration suspended
sediment concentrations (SSC) in Big Spring Run
48
Preliminary Information-Subject to Revision. Not for Citation or Distribution.
Discrete and continuous methods for
computing SSC loads in Big Spring Run
49
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
71%
Pre-restoration Post-restoration
USGS Water Year
Annual suspended sediment load for 2008 through 2015 water years
50
Preliminary Information-Subject to Revision. Not for Citation or Distribution.
Pre- and post- restoration unfiltered total phosphorous
concentrations in Big Spring Run
51
Preliminary Information-Subject to Revision. Not for Citation or Distribution.
Pre- and post-restoration SSC at USGS site 015765195
(WY2009-15) and at two sites from Galeone and others (2006)
52
U.S. Department of the Interior
U.S. Geological Survey
References
Langland, M.J., 2019, Data in support of study
evaluating effects of legacy-sediment removal on
nutrients and sediment in Big Spring Run, Lancaster
County, Pennsylvania, 2009-15: U.S. Geological Survey
data release, https://doi.org/10.5066/F7GH9G5K
Langland, M.J., Duris, J.W., Zimmerman, T.M., and
Chaplin, J.J., in press, Effects of legacy-sediment
removal and effects on nutrients and sediment in Big
Spring Run, Lancaster County, Pennsylvania, 2009-15:
U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report
Preliminary Information-Subject to Revision. Not for Citation or Distribution.
53
• Median suspended sediment concentrations decreased from 556 mg/L to
74 mg/L representing an 87% reduction from pre- to post- restoration.
• The suspended sediment load decreased by 71% (600 tons per year) from
pre- to post- restoration.
• Total phosphorus concentrations decreased from 0.19 mg/L to 0.04 mg/L
representing a 79% reduction from pre- to post- restoration.
• Legacy sediment removal and aquatic ecosystem restoration was 10.5 times
more effective in reducing suspended sediment than other agricultural best
management practices that included a combination of streambank fencing
and cattle crossings.
54
Summary of USGS surface water quality monitoring
Restoring stream-floodplain connection with legacy sediment removal
increases denitrification and nitrate retention, Big Spring Run, PA USA.
Kenneth J. Forshay1, Julie Weitzman2, Jessica Wilhelm3, Paul Mayer4, Ann Keeley1, Dorothy
Merritts5, and Robert Walter5
(1)Office of Research and Development, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Ada, OK, (2)Carrey Institute, (3)Oak Ridge
Affiliated Universities(4) Office of Research and Development United states Environmental Protection Agency, Corvallis, OR, (5) Franklin
and Marshall College
This presentation contains research done by EPA staff and does not necessarily reflect EPA policy
Office of Research and Development
NRMRL, Groundwater, Watershed,and Ecosystem Restoration Division, Ecosystem and Subsurface Protection Branch
56
Surface water nitrate decreased gradually.
Pre-restoration Pre-restorationPost-restoration Post-restoration
Groundwater nitrate decreased in the fourth year after restoration.
Pre-restoration Post-restoration
High C:N is an indicator of nitrate reduction and GW connectivity.
Pre-restoration Post-restoration
Sediment C and N recovered simultaneously.
Pre-
restoration
Pre-
restoration
Post-restoration Post-restoration
Post restoration nitrate loads are smaller than pre-restoration.
Load = [NO3] x Mean Daily Discharge
60±4 kg day-1 n=33
Pre restoration (2008-2011)
41±3 kg day-1 n=44
Post restoration (2012-2016)
p<0.001 df = 76
Soil extractable P is lower.
Pre-restoration Post-restoration
Downstream dissolved P is lower post restoration.
Pre-restoration Post-restoration
• Nitrate retention primarily is driven by enhancement of organic carbon and
resulting bio-geochemical processes at Big Spring Run
• The restoration improved nitrate retention, but it took several years for that
trend to emerge in response to the maturation of the wetland complex
• Nitrogen and phosphorous fluxes are reduced when comparing the pre-
restoration and post- restoration periods
64
Summary of USEPA surface & ground water quality monitoring
August 2012 65
Big Spring Run biological and living resources monitoring results
2011: pre-restoration
Navicula
gregaria
Navicula
reichardtiana
Nitzschia
palea s.l.
Diatom assemblages similar
to those found in 1948 in
relatively “healthy” Lancaster
County streams.
Nitzschia cf. gessneri
Potapova, et al, 2016
66
Figure 1.2. Scanning electron microscopy images of the common diatoms
from BSR samples. A– Achnanthidium minutissimum, B – A. saprophilum, C
– Eolimna minima, D – Amphora pediculus, E – Cocconeis placentula, F –
Melosira varians, G- Navicula antonii, H – Surirella lacrimula, I –
Thalassiosira weissflogii, J – Nitzschia dissipata, K – Hippodonta
pseudacceptata, L- Gomphonema parvulum var. saprophilum, M – Craticula
subminuscula, N- Nitzschia palea, O – Gyrosigma obtusatum.
Common diatoms from Big Spring Run
Potapova, et al, 2016
67
• Before the 1700s, Big Spring Run was inhabited by diverse diatom communities
that are known to prefer slow-moving clean waters with abundant vegetation and
wetlands.
• Diatom diversity increased after restoration based on mean species richness in
the restored reach. The increase in species richness may be attributed to
enhanced habitat complexity that provides a greater diversity of substrates and
flow conditions.
• Diatom nutrient metrics indicated that post-restoration assemblages had fewer
diatoms associated with high nutrients and more of those indicative of low
nutrients.
• It is unrealistic to expect the biota to revert to its pre-1700s condition given the
existing water quality, but increased diversity and higher proportion of
oligotraphenic species is a benefit and positive ecosystem recovery trajectory.
68
Courtesy D. Bowne Elizabethtown College
Restored habitat where green frog egg mass
was found.
Eurycea bislineata (Northern two-lined) and
Pseudotriton ruber (Northern red) larvae
Lithobates clamitans (Green frog) tadpole
Green frog egg mass
69
-0.50
0.00
0.50
1.00
1.50
2.00
2.50
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Meancapturesperuniteffort
Restored Not Restored
Figure 2. The mean number of captures per unit effort (± STD) of
Eurycea bislineata for restored and not restored stream segments from
2011 to 2016. All of the data from 2011 are pre-restoration. The mean
number of captures did not significantly vary by year or treatment.
Bowne, D.R., and Conway, R. In prep. Amphibian Use of a Restored Wetland in an
Agricultural Landscape. Department of Biology, Elizabethtown College, PA.
70
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nnxhs3aTTJs
“SRBC Water Tour 2017” excerpts
Courtesy Susquehanna River Basin Commission, 2017
71
September 2015 Fish Survey
rosyside dace (Clinostomus funduloides)
This species prefers headwater streams typical of cold water fishes and is an indication of improved water
quality in the restored reach. It also prefers gravelly riffles for spawning and typically inhabits rocky streams.
Native
Range
72
Courtesy William Hilgartner
73
Vascular plant surveys of 1 m2 plots at 5 m intervals repeated along transects
Pre-restoration Post-restoration
Vascular plant species richness and wetland indicator status
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Native
Non-
Native
N=21 N=86 N=85
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
FAC, FACW,
OBL
FACU, UPL,
NI
N=21 N=86 N=85
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
OBL
N=21 N=86 N=85
74
Notable post-restoration vascular plant colonizers
USDA Plant database
Juncus torreyi
Torrey’s rush
PA State Threatened
Facultative
Carex amphibola
narrowleaf sedge
Facultative
http://phytoimages.siu.edu
J. Hartranft 2015
J. Hartranft 2015
75
76
Post-restoration terrestrial laser survey June 6, 2015
High Trees
Low Grasses
Plant Canopy Height
77
Summary of biological and living resources monitoring
• Diatom diversity increased after restoration based on mean species richness. The
increase in species richness may be attributed to enhanced habitat complexity
that now provides a greater diversity of channel substrates and flow conditions.
• Diatom nutrient metrics indicated that post-restoration assemblages had fewer
diatoms associated with high nutrients and more of those indicative of low
nutrients.
• Northern two-lined salamanders (E. bislineata) captures have consistently
increased in the restoration area while its captures in adjacent unrestored areas
have fluctuated.
• While green frog (L. clamitans) is a nationally common frog species, it was found
residing and breeding in the restored areas after restoration but was previously
absent.
78
Summary of biological and living resources monitoring (cont.)
• A major vascular plant community shift occurred from a dry upland pasture to a
wet meadow plant community type
• Increasing importance of vascular plant hydrophytes after restoration provides
diverse wetland habitat that is comparable to the reference condition
• Vascular plant hydrophytes have colonized the restoration area, including the PA
Threatened Torrey’s sedge (Juncus torreyi)
• The presence of threatened and endangered species indicates Exceptional value
wetlands in accordance with 25 PA Code § 105.17 Wetlands have been restored
Flemming, et. al. 2019 Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 79
80Flemming, et. al. 2019 Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
81Flemming, et. al. 2019 Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
82Flemming, et. al. 2019 Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
Dr. Dorothy Merritts, Franklin and Marshall College
Dr. Robert Walter, Franklin and Marshall College
Michael Rahnis, Franklin and Marshall College
U.S. Geological Survey; Michael Langland, Joe Duris, Tammy Zimmerman and Jeff Chaplin
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; Kenneth Forshay, Julie Weitzman, Jessica Wilhelm,
Paul Mayer, Ann Keeley
LandStudies Incorporated, Lititz PA
Dr. Art Parola, University of Louisville
Dr. David Bowne, Elizabethtown College
Dr. Marina Potapova, Drexel University
Dr. Patrick Flemming, Water Science Institute & Franklin and Marshall College
Susquehanna River Basin Commission, Jamie Shallenberger
Joseph Sweeney, Water Science Institute
83
Presentation Contributors
Questions ?
Contact Information
Jeffrey Hartranft
Bureau of Waterways Engineering and Wetlands
Division of Wetlands Encroachment and Training
jhartranft@pa.gov
717-772-5320
84

More Related Content

What's hot

C and E News SRF article
C and E News SRF articleC and E News SRF article
C and E News SRF articleRachel Denby
 
Maryland Environmental Site Design Presentation
Maryland Environmental Site Design PresentationMaryland Environmental Site Design Presentation
Maryland Environmental Site Design Presentation
Theodore Scott
 
Conservation tillage effects in the atlantic coastal plain
Conservation tillage effects in the atlantic coastal plainConservation tillage effects in the atlantic coastal plain
Conservation tillage effects in the atlantic coastal plain
Soil and Water Conservation Society
 
Measured effects of conservation watershed scale
Measured effects of conservation watershed scaleMeasured effects of conservation watershed scale
Measured effects of conservation watershed scale
Soil and Water Conservation Society
 
Colloid Mobilization and Biogeochemical Cycling of Organic Carbon, Nitrogen a...
Colloid Mobilization and Biogeochemical Cycling of Organic Carbon, Nitrogen a...Colloid Mobilization and Biogeochemical Cycling of Organic Carbon, Nitrogen a...
Colloid Mobilization and Biogeochemical Cycling of Organic Carbon, Nitrogen a...
National Institute of Food and Agriculture
 
McKenzie A - UEI Day 1 - Kochi Jan18
McKenzie A - UEI Day 1 - Kochi Jan18McKenzie A - UEI Day 1 - Kochi Jan18
McKenzie A - UEI Day 1 - Kochi Jan18
India UK Water Centre (IUKWC)
 
Watershed Diagnostics for Improved Adoption of Management Practices: Integrat...
Watershed Diagnostics for Improved Adoption of Management Practices: Integrat...Watershed Diagnostics for Improved Adoption of Management Practices: Integrat...
Watershed Diagnostics for Improved Adoption of Management Practices: Integrat...
National Institute of Food and Agriculture
 
Stephanie Romano - Professional Profile
Stephanie Romano - Professional ProfileStephanie Romano - Professional Profile
Stephanie Romano - Professional ProfileStephanie Romano
 
Urban Planning Design Considerations for Better Water Quality, Bill Hunt NC S...
Urban Planning Design Considerations for Better Water Quality, Bill Hunt NC S...Urban Planning Design Considerations for Better Water Quality, Bill Hunt NC S...
Urban Planning Design Considerations for Better Water Quality, Bill Hunt NC S...
Fu Michael Justin
 
Green infrastructure policy for stormwater infiltration
Green infrastructure policy for stormwater infiltrationGreen infrastructure policy for stormwater infiltration
Green infrastructure policy for stormwater infiltration
Evan Pratt
 
Krider - Prioritizing Watersheds for PMP Placement
Krider - Prioritizing Watersheds for PMP PlacementKrider - Prioritizing Watersheds for PMP Placement
Krider - Prioritizing Watersheds for PMP Placement
Soil and Water Conservation Society
 
Analysis of Conservation Practice Effectiveness and Producer Adoption Behavio...
Analysis of Conservation Practice Effectiveness and Producer Adoption Behavio...Analysis of Conservation Practice Effectiveness and Producer Adoption Behavio...
Analysis of Conservation Practice Effectiveness and Producer Adoption Behavio...
National Institute of Food and Agriculture
 
King - Edge of Field Water Quality Monitoring
King - Edge of Field Water Quality Monitoring King - Edge of Field Water Quality Monitoring
King - Edge of Field Water Quality Monitoring
Soil and Water Conservation Society
 
Kevin Vought Select Samples of Water Resource Capability
Kevin Vought Select Samples of Water Resource CapabilityKevin Vought Select Samples of Water Resource Capability
Kevin Vought Select Samples of Water Resource CapabilityKevin Vought, P.E.
 
Kansas CIty's Green Solutions Pilot Project - Technical Approaches, Emerging ...
Kansas CIty's Green Solutions Pilot Project - Technical Approaches, Emerging ...Kansas CIty's Green Solutions Pilot Project - Technical Approaches, Emerging ...
Kansas CIty's Green Solutions Pilot Project - Technical Approaches, Emerging ...
Jessi Veach
 
Measured effects of conservation
Measured effects of conservationMeasured effects of conservation
Measured effects of conservation
Soil and Water Conservation Society
 
Max KroschelResume061715
Max KroschelResume061715Max KroschelResume061715
Max KroschelResume061715Max Kroschel
 
Presentation final
Presentation finalPresentation final
Presentation final
HudsonAdams
 

What's hot (20)

Repa_Resume 2015
Repa_Resume 2015Repa_Resume 2015
Repa_Resume 2015
 
C and E News SRF article
C and E News SRF articleC and E News SRF article
C and E News SRF article
 
Maryland Environmental Site Design Presentation
Maryland Environmental Site Design PresentationMaryland Environmental Site Design Presentation
Maryland Environmental Site Design Presentation
 
Conservation tillage effects in the atlantic coastal plain
Conservation tillage effects in the atlantic coastal plainConservation tillage effects in the atlantic coastal plain
Conservation tillage effects in the atlantic coastal plain
 
Measured effects of conservation watershed scale
Measured effects of conservation watershed scaleMeasured effects of conservation watershed scale
Measured effects of conservation watershed scale
 
Colloid Mobilization and Biogeochemical Cycling of Organic Carbon, Nitrogen a...
Colloid Mobilization and Biogeochemical Cycling of Organic Carbon, Nitrogen a...Colloid Mobilization and Biogeochemical Cycling of Organic Carbon, Nitrogen a...
Colloid Mobilization and Biogeochemical Cycling of Organic Carbon, Nitrogen a...
 
McKenzie A - UEI Day 1 - Kochi Jan18
McKenzie A - UEI Day 1 - Kochi Jan18McKenzie A - UEI Day 1 - Kochi Jan18
McKenzie A - UEI Day 1 - Kochi Jan18
 
Watershed Diagnostics for Improved Adoption of Management Practices: Integrat...
Watershed Diagnostics for Improved Adoption of Management Practices: Integrat...Watershed Diagnostics for Improved Adoption of Management Practices: Integrat...
Watershed Diagnostics for Improved Adoption of Management Practices: Integrat...
 
Stephanie Romano - Professional Profile
Stephanie Romano - Professional ProfileStephanie Romano - Professional Profile
Stephanie Romano - Professional Profile
 
Urban Planning Design Considerations for Better Water Quality, Bill Hunt NC S...
Urban Planning Design Considerations for Better Water Quality, Bill Hunt NC S...Urban Planning Design Considerations for Better Water Quality, Bill Hunt NC S...
Urban Planning Design Considerations for Better Water Quality, Bill Hunt NC S...
 
Green infrastructure policy for stormwater infiltration
Green infrastructure policy for stormwater infiltrationGreen infrastructure policy for stormwater infiltration
Green infrastructure policy for stormwater infiltration
 
Krider - Prioritizing Watersheds for PMP Placement
Krider - Prioritizing Watersheds for PMP PlacementKrider - Prioritizing Watersheds for PMP Placement
Krider - Prioritizing Watersheds for PMP Placement
 
Analysis of Conservation Practice Effectiveness and Producer Adoption Behavio...
Analysis of Conservation Practice Effectiveness and Producer Adoption Behavio...Analysis of Conservation Practice Effectiveness and Producer Adoption Behavio...
Analysis of Conservation Practice Effectiveness and Producer Adoption Behavio...
 
King - Edge of Field Water Quality Monitoring
King - Edge of Field Water Quality Monitoring King - Edge of Field Water Quality Monitoring
King - Edge of Field Water Quality Monitoring
 
Kevin Vought Select Samples of Water Resource Capability
Kevin Vought Select Samples of Water Resource CapabilityKevin Vought Select Samples of Water Resource Capability
Kevin Vought Select Samples of Water Resource Capability
 
Kansas CIty's Green Solutions Pilot Project - Technical Approaches, Emerging ...
Kansas CIty's Green Solutions Pilot Project - Technical Approaches, Emerging ...Kansas CIty's Green Solutions Pilot Project - Technical Approaches, Emerging ...
Kansas CIty's Green Solutions Pilot Project - Technical Approaches, Emerging ...
 
Measured effects of conservation
Measured effects of conservationMeasured effects of conservation
Measured effects of conservation
 
Max KroschelResume061715
Max KroschelResume061715Max KroschelResume061715
Max KroschelResume061715
 
Iowa
IowaIowa
Iowa
 
Presentation final
Presentation finalPresentation final
Presentation final
 

Similar to Big Spring Run Restoration Project Background & Monitoring Results, November-21-2019

Essex climatechangeflooding_ScottHursley
Essex climatechangeflooding_ScottHursleyEssex climatechangeflooding_ScottHursley
Essex climatechangeflooding_ScottHursley
greenbelt82
 
Structured Planning of Restoration Projects: Linking Science to Outcomes
Structured Planning of Restoration Projects: Linking Science to OutcomesStructured Planning of Restoration Projects: Linking Science to Outcomes
Structured Planning of Restoration Projects: Linking Science to Outcomes
CIFOR-ICRAF
 
Nature Nights: A Low-to-No Snow Future
Nature Nights: A Low-to-No Snow FutureNature Nights: A Low-to-No Snow Future
Nature Nights: A Low-to-No Snow Future
DesLandTrust
 
Ragab R 1 - UEI Day 1 - Kochi Jan18
Ragab R 1 - UEI Day 1 - Kochi Jan18Ragab R 1 - UEI Day 1 - Kochi Jan18
Ragab R 1 - UEI Day 1 - Kochi Jan18
India UK Water Centre (IUKWC)
 
Qurat ul ain ahmad
Qurat ul ain ahmadQurat ul ain ahmad
Qurat ul ain ahmadClimDev15
 
Alternative Usage Cases for Pressure Retarded Osmosis Power Generation
Alternative Usage Cases for Pressure Retarded Osmosis Power GenerationAlternative Usage Cases for Pressure Retarded Osmosis Power Generation
Alternative Usage Cases for Pressure Retarded Osmosis Power Generation
Joshua Benjamin, E.I.
 
ARMF 2014 Employment of Proactive Mitigation Strategies in Combination with R...
ARMF 2014 Employment of Proactive Mitigation Strategies in Combination with R...ARMF 2014 Employment of Proactive Mitigation Strategies in Combination with R...
ARMF 2014 Employment of Proactive Mitigation Strategies in Combination with R...Janna Ellis Kepley
 
Apec workshop 2 presentation 13 r wright apec-gccsi engineering disclipines...
Apec workshop 2 presentation 13  r wright apec-gccsi  engineering disclipines...Apec workshop 2 presentation 13  r wright apec-gccsi  engineering disclipines...
Apec workshop 2 presentation 13 r wright apec-gccsi engineering disclipines...Global CCS Institute
 
Crooked Lake Comp Plan Summary For CCWD Board Adoption
Crooked Lake Comp Plan Summary For CCWD Board AdoptionCrooked Lake Comp Plan Summary For CCWD Board Adoption
Crooked Lake Comp Plan Summary For CCWD Board Adoption
Coon Creek Watershed District
 
September 1 - 0330 - Chandra Madramootoo
September 1 - 0330 - Chandra MadramootooSeptember 1 - 0330 - Chandra Madramootoo
September 1 - 0330 - Chandra Madramootoo
Soil and Water Conservation Society
 
2013 Uplift Report: Quantifying Ecological Uplift
2013 Uplift Report: Quantifying Ecological Uplift2013 Uplift Report: Quantifying Ecological Uplift
2013 Uplift Report: Quantifying Ecological Uplift
The Freshwater Trust
 
The Green Bay Saga: Research for Management of a Freshwater Estuary
The Green Bay Saga: Research for Management of a Freshwater EstuaryThe Green Bay Saga: Research for Management of a Freshwater Estuary
The Green Bay Saga: Research for Management of a Freshwater Estuary
Paul A. Wozniak
 
Water extremes in austin texas
Water extremes in austin texasWater extremes in austin texas
Water extremes in austin texas
U.S. Water Alliance
 
IRJET - Underground Water Recharge through Rainwater Harvesting using Rem...
IRJET -  	  Underground Water Recharge through Rainwater Harvesting using Rem...IRJET -  	  Underground Water Recharge through Rainwater Harvesting using Rem...
IRJET - Underground Water Recharge through Rainwater Harvesting using Rem...
IRJET Journal
 
Steven Apfelbaum - Wetlands: Sinking Carbon and Keeping It Out of the Atmosphere
Steven Apfelbaum - Wetlands: Sinking Carbon and Keeping It Out of the AtmosphereSteven Apfelbaum - Wetlands: Sinking Carbon and Keeping It Out of the Atmosphere
Steven Apfelbaum - Wetlands: Sinking Carbon and Keeping It Out of the Atmosphere
gabriellebastien
 
Steven Apfelbaum - Wetlands: Sinking Carbon and Keeping It Out of the Atmosphere
Steven Apfelbaum - Wetlands: Sinking Carbon and Keeping It Out of the AtmosphereSteven Apfelbaum - Wetlands: Sinking Carbon and Keeping It Out of the Atmosphere
Steven Apfelbaum - Wetlands: Sinking Carbon and Keeping It Out of the Atmosphere
bio4climate
 
IRJET- A Review of Inverted Absorber Solar Still
IRJET-  	  A Review of Inverted Absorber Solar Still IRJET-  	  A Review of Inverted Absorber Solar Still
IRJET- A Review of Inverted Absorber Solar Still
IRJET Journal
 
Desalination Sustainably Drought Proofing Australia
Desalination Sustainably Drought Proofing AustraliaDesalination Sustainably Drought Proofing Australia
Desalination Sustainably Drought Proofing Australia
Engineers Australia
 
Environmental Impact Assessment in Water Resources Projects
Environmental Impact Assessment in Water Resources ProjectsEnvironmental Impact Assessment in Water Resources Projects
Environmental Impact Assessment in Water Resources Projects
National Institute of Technology Hamirpur
 
A Framework for Setting Realistic Expectations for Water Quality Improvements...
A Framework for Setting Realistic Expectations for Water Quality Improvements...A Framework for Setting Realistic Expectations for Water Quality Improvements...
A Framework for Setting Realistic Expectations for Water Quality Improvements...
Soil and Water Conservation Society
 

Similar to Big Spring Run Restoration Project Background & Monitoring Results, November-21-2019 (20)

Essex climatechangeflooding_ScottHursley
Essex climatechangeflooding_ScottHursleyEssex climatechangeflooding_ScottHursley
Essex climatechangeflooding_ScottHursley
 
Structured Planning of Restoration Projects: Linking Science to Outcomes
Structured Planning of Restoration Projects: Linking Science to OutcomesStructured Planning of Restoration Projects: Linking Science to Outcomes
Structured Planning of Restoration Projects: Linking Science to Outcomes
 
Nature Nights: A Low-to-No Snow Future
Nature Nights: A Low-to-No Snow FutureNature Nights: A Low-to-No Snow Future
Nature Nights: A Low-to-No Snow Future
 
Ragab R 1 - UEI Day 1 - Kochi Jan18
Ragab R 1 - UEI Day 1 - Kochi Jan18Ragab R 1 - UEI Day 1 - Kochi Jan18
Ragab R 1 - UEI Day 1 - Kochi Jan18
 
Qurat ul ain ahmad
Qurat ul ain ahmadQurat ul ain ahmad
Qurat ul ain ahmad
 
Alternative Usage Cases for Pressure Retarded Osmosis Power Generation
Alternative Usage Cases for Pressure Retarded Osmosis Power GenerationAlternative Usage Cases for Pressure Retarded Osmosis Power Generation
Alternative Usage Cases for Pressure Retarded Osmosis Power Generation
 
ARMF 2014 Employment of Proactive Mitigation Strategies in Combination with R...
ARMF 2014 Employment of Proactive Mitigation Strategies in Combination with R...ARMF 2014 Employment of Proactive Mitigation Strategies in Combination with R...
ARMF 2014 Employment of Proactive Mitigation Strategies in Combination with R...
 
Apec workshop 2 presentation 13 r wright apec-gccsi engineering disclipines...
Apec workshop 2 presentation 13  r wright apec-gccsi  engineering disclipines...Apec workshop 2 presentation 13  r wright apec-gccsi  engineering disclipines...
Apec workshop 2 presentation 13 r wright apec-gccsi engineering disclipines...
 
Crooked Lake Comp Plan Summary For CCWD Board Adoption
Crooked Lake Comp Plan Summary For CCWD Board AdoptionCrooked Lake Comp Plan Summary For CCWD Board Adoption
Crooked Lake Comp Plan Summary For CCWD Board Adoption
 
September 1 - 0330 - Chandra Madramootoo
September 1 - 0330 - Chandra MadramootooSeptember 1 - 0330 - Chandra Madramootoo
September 1 - 0330 - Chandra Madramootoo
 
2013 Uplift Report: Quantifying Ecological Uplift
2013 Uplift Report: Quantifying Ecological Uplift2013 Uplift Report: Quantifying Ecological Uplift
2013 Uplift Report: Quantifying Ecological Uplift
 
The Green Bay Saga: Research for Management of a Freshwater Estuary
The Green Bay Saga: Research for Management of a Freshwater EstuaryThe Green Bay Saga: Research for Management of a Freshwater Estuary
The Green Bay Saga: Research for Management of a Freshwater Estuary
 
Water extremes in austin texas
Water extremes in austin texasWater extremes in austin texas
Water extremes in austin texas
 
IRJET - Underground Water Recharge through Rainwater Harvesting using Rem...
IRJET -  	  Underground Water Recharge through Rainwater Harvesting using Rem...IRJET -  	  Underground Water Recharge through Rainwater Harvesting using Rem...
IRJET - Underground Water Recharge through Rainwater Harvesting using Rem...
 
Steven Apfelbaum - Wetlands: Sinking Carbon and Keeping It Out of the Atmosphere
Steven Apfelbaum - Wetlands: Sinking Carbon and Keeping It Out of the AtmosphereSteven Apfelbaum - Wetlands: Sinking Carbon and Keeping It Out of the Atmosphere
Steven Apfelbaum - Wetlands: Sinking Carbon and Keeping It Out of the Atmosphere
 
Steven Apfelbaum - Wetlands: Sinking Carbon and Keeping It Out of the Atmosphere
Steven Apfelbaum - Wetlands: Sinking Carbon and Keeping It Out of the AtmosphereSteven Apfelbaum - Wetlands: Sinking Carbon and Keeping It Out of the Atmosphere
Steven Apfelbaum - Wetlands: Sinking Carbon and Keeping It Out of the Atmosphere
 
IRJET- A Review of Inverted Absorber Solar Still
IRJET-  	  A Review of Inverted Absorber Solar Still IRJET-  	  A Review of Inverted Absorber Solar Still
IRJET- A Review of Inverted Absorber Solar Still
 
Desalination Sustainably Drought Proofing Australia
Desalination Sustainably Drought Proofing AustraliaDesalination Sustainably Drought Proofing Australia
Desalination Sustainably Drought Proofing Australia
 
Environmental Impact Assessment in Water Resources Projects
Environmental Impact Assessment in Water Resources ProjectsEnvironmental Impact Assessment in Water Resources Projects
Environmental Impact Assessment in Water Resources Projects
 
A Framework for Setting Realistic Expectations for Water Quality Improvements...
A Framework for Setting Realistic Expectations for Water Quality Improvements...A Framework for Setting Realistic Expectations for Water Quality Improvements...
A Framework for Setting Realistic Expectations for Water Quality Improvements...
 

Recently uploaded

Presentación Giulio Quaggiotto-Diálogo improbable .pptx.pdf
Presentación Giulio Quaggiotto-Diálogo improbable .pptx.pdfPresentación Giulio Quaggiotto-Diálogo improbable .pptx.pdf
Presentación Giulio Quaggiotto-Diálogo improbable .pptx.pdf
Innovation and Technology for Development Centre
 
growbilliontrees.com-Trees for Granddaughter (1).pdf
growbilliontrees.com-Trees for Granddaughter (1).pdfgrowbilliontrees.com-Trees for Granddaughter (1).pdf
growbilliontrees.com-Trees for Granddaughter (1).pdf
yadavakashagra
 
一比一原版(UMTC毕业证书)明尼苏达大学双城分校毕业证如何办理
一比一原版(UMTC毕业证书)明尼苏达大学双城分校毕业证如何办理一比一原版(UMTC毕业证书)明尼苏达大学双城分校毕业证如何办理
一比一原版(UMTC毕业证书)明尼苏达大学双城分校毕业证如何办理
zm9ajxup
 
alhambra case study Islamic gardens part-2.pptx
alhambra case study Islamic gardens part-2.pptxalhambra case study Islamic gardens part-2.pptx
alhambra case study Islamic gardens part-2.pptx
CECOS University Peshawar, Pakistan
 
UNDERSTANDING WHAT GREEN WASHING IS!.pdf
UNDERSTANDING WHAT GREEN WASHING IS!.pdfUNDERSTANDING WHAT GREEN WASHING IS!.pdf
UNDERSTANDING WHAT GREEN WASHING IS!.pdf
JulietMogola
 
Artificial Reefs by Kuddle Life Foundation - May 2024
Artificial Reefs by Kuddle Life Foundation - May 2024Artificial Reefs by Kuddle Life Foundation - May 2024
Artificial Reefs by Kuddle Life Foundation - May 2024
punit537210
 
"Understanding the Carbon Cycle: Processes, Human Impacts, and Strategies for...
"Understanding the Carbon Cycle: Processes, Human Impacts, and Strategies for..."Understanding the Carbon Cycle: Processes, Human Impacts, and Strategies for...
"Understanding the Carbon Cycle: Processes, Human Impacts, and Strategies for...
MMariSelvam4
 
Summary of the Climate and Energy Policy of Australia
Summary of the Climate and Energy Policy of AustraliaSummary of the Climate and Energy Policy of Australia
Summary of the Climate and Energy Policy of Australia
yasmindemoraes1
 
ppt on beauty of the nature by Palak.pptx
ppt on  beauty of the nature by Palak.pptxppt on  beauty of the nature by Palak.pptx
ppt on beauty of the nature by Palak.pptx
RaniJaiswal16
 
Celebrating World-environment-day-2024.pdf
Celebrating  World-environment-day-2024.pdfCelebrating  World-environment-day-2024.pdf
Celebrating World-environment-day-2024.pdf
rohankumarsinghrore1
 
Willie Nelson Net Worth: A Journey Through Music, Movies, and Business Ventures
Willie Nelson Net Worth: A Journey Through Music, Movies, and Business VenturesWillie Nelson Net Worth: A Journey Through Music, Movies, and Business Ventures
Willie Nelson Net Worth: A Journey Through Music, Movies, and Business Ventures
greendigital
 
AGRICULTURE Hydrophonic FERTILISER PPT.pptx
AGRICULTURE Hydrophonic FERTILISER PPT.pptxAGRICULTURE Hydrophonic FERTILISER PPT.pptx
AGRICULTURE Hydrophonic FERTILISER PPT.pptx
BanitaDsouza
 
Sustainable farming practices in India .pptx
Sustainable farming  practices in India .pptxSustainable farming  practices in India .pptx
Sustainable farming practices in India .pptx
chaitaliambole
 
Sustainable Rain water harvesting in india.ppt
Sustainable Rain water harvesting in india.pptSustainable Rain water harvesting in india.ppt
Sustainable Rain water harvesting in india.ppt
chaitaliambole
 
International+e-Commerce+Platform-www.cfye-commerce.shop
International+e-Commerce+Platform-www.cfye-commerce.shopInternational+e-Commerce+Platform-www.cfye-commerce.shop
International+e-Commerce+Platform-www.cfye-commerce.shop
laozhuseo02
 
Environmental Science Book By Dr. Y.K. Singh
Environmental Science Book By Dr. Y.K. SinghEnvironmental Science Book By Dr. Y.K. Singh
Environmental Science Book By Dr. Y.K. Singh
AhmadKhan917612
 
DRAFT NRW Recreation Strategy - People and Nature thriving together
DRAFT NRW Recreation Strategy - People and Nature thriving togetherDRAFT NRW Recreation Strategy - People and Nature thriving together
DRAFT NRW Recreation Strategy - People and Nature thriving together
Robin Grant
 
Characterization and the Kinetics of drying at the drying oven and with micro...
Characterization and the Kinetics of drying at the drying oven and with micro...Characterization and the Kinetics of drying at the drying oven and with micro...
Characterization and the Kinetics of drying at the drying oven and with micro...
Open Access Research Paper
 
Q&A with the Experts: The Food Service Playbook
Q&A with the Experts: The Food Service PlaybookQ&A with the Experts: The Food Service Playbook
Q&A with the Experts: The Food Service Playbook
World Resources Institute (WRI)
 
Natural farming @ Dr. Siddhartha S. Jena.pptx
Natural farming @ Dr. Siddhartha S. Jena.pptxNatural farming @ Dr. Siddhartha S. Jena.pptx
Natural farming @ Dr. Siddhartha S. Jena.pptx
sidjena70
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Presentación Giulio Quaggiotto-Diálogo improbable .pptx.pdf
Presentación Giulio Quaggiotto-Diálogo improbable .pptx.pdfPresentación Giulio Quaggiotto-Diálogo improbable .pptx.pdf
Presentación Giulio Quaggiotto-Diálogo improbable .pptx.pdf
 
growbilliontrees.com-Trees for Granddaughter (1).pdf
growbilliontrees.com-Trees for Granddaughter (1).pdfgrowbilliontrees.com-Trees for Granddaughter (1).pdf
growbilliontrees.com-Trees for Granddaughter (1).pdf
 
一比一原版(UMTC毕业证书)明尼苏达大学双城分校毕业证如何办理
一比一原版(UMTC毕业证书)明尼苏达大学双城分校毕业证如何办理一比一原版(UMTC毕业证书)明尼苏达大学双城分校毕业证如何办理
一比一原版(UMTC毕业证书)明尼苏达大学双城分校毕业证如何办理
 
alhambra case study Islamic gardens part-2.pptx
alhambra case study Islamic gardens part-2.pptxalhambra case study Islamic gardens part-2.pptx
alhambra case study Islamic gardens part-2.pptx
 
UNDERSTANDING WHAT GREEN WASHING IS!.pdf
UNDERSTANDING WHAT GREEN WASHING IS!.pdfUNDERSTANDING WHAT GREEN WASHING IS!.pdf
UNDERSTANDING WHAT GREEN WASHING IS!.pdf
 
Artificial Reefs by Kuddle Life Foundation - May 2024
Artificial Reefs by Kuddle Life Foundation - May 2024Artificial Reefs by Kuddle Life Foundation - May 2024
Artificial Reefs by Kuddle Life Foundation - May 2024
 
"Understanding the Carbon Cycle: Processes, Human Impacts, and Strategies for...
"Understanding the Carbon Cycle: Processes, Human Impacts, and Strategies for..."Understanding the Carbon Cycle: Processes, Human Impacts, and Strategies for...
"Understanding the Carbon Cycle: Processes, Human Impacts, and Strategies for...
 
Summary of the Climate and Energy Policy of Australia
Summary of the Climate and Energy Policy of AustraliaSummary of the Climate and Energy Policy of Australia
Summary of the Climate and Energy Policy of Australia
 
ppt on beauty of the nature by Palak.pptx
ppt on  beauty of the nature by Palak.pptxppt on  beauty of the nature by Palak.pptx
ppt on beauty of the nature by Palak.pptx
 
Celebrating World-environment-day-2024.pdf
Celebrating  World-environment-day-2024.pdfCelebrating  World-environment-day-2024.pdf
Celebrating World-environment-day-2024.pdf
 
Willie Nelson Net Worth: A Journey Through Music, Movies, and Business Ventures
Willie Nelson Net Worth: A Journey Through Music, Movies, and Business VenturesWillie Nelson Net Worth: A Journey Through Music, Movies, and Business Ventures
Willie Nelson Net Worth: A Journey Through Music, Movies, and Business Ventures
 
AGRICULTURE Hydrophonic FERTILISER PPT.pptx
AGRICULTURE Hydrophonic FERTILISER PPT.pptxAGRICULTURE Hydrophonic FERTILISER PPT.pptx
AGRICULTURE Hydrophonic FERTILISER PPT.pptx
 
Sustainable farming practices in India .pptx
Sustainable farming  practices in India .pptxSustainable farming  practices in India .pptx
Sustainable farming practices in India .pptx
 
Sustainable Rain water harvesting in india.ppt
Sustainable Rain water harvesting in india.pptSustainable Rain water harvesting in india.ppt
Sustainable Rain water harvesting in india.ppt
 
International+e-Commerce+Platform-www.cfye-commerce.shop
International+e-Commerce+Platform-www.cfye-commerce.shopInternational+e-Commerce+Platform-www.cfye-commerce.shop
International+e-Commerce+Platform-www.cfye-commerce.shop
 
Environmental Science Book By Dr. Y.K. Singh
Environmental Science Book By Dr. Y.K. SinghEnvironmental Science Book By Dr. Y.K. Singh
Environmental Science Book By Dr. Y.K. Singh
 
DRAFT NRW Recreation Strategy - People and Nature thriving together
DRAFT NRW Recreation Strategy - People and Nature thriving togetherDRAFT NRW Recreation Strategy - People and Nature thriving together
DRAFT NRW Recreation Strategy - People and Nature thriving together
 
Characterization and the Kinetics of drying at the drying oven and with micro...
Characterization and the Kinetics of drying at the drying oven and with micro...Characterization and the Kinetics of drying at the drying oven and with micro...
Characterization and the Kinetics of drying at the drying oven and with micro...
 
Q&A with the Experts: The Food Service Playbook
Q&A with the Experts: The Food Service PlaybookQ&A with the Experts: The Food Service Playbook
Q&A with the Experts: The Food Service Playbook
 
Natural farming @ Dr. Siddhartha S. Jena.pptx
Natural farming @ Dr. Siddhartha S. Jena.pptxNatural farming @ Dr. Siddhartha S. Jena.pptx
Natural farming @ Dr. Siddhartha S. Jena.pptx
 

Big Spring Run Restoration Project Background & Monitoring Results, November-21-2019

  • 1. Jeffrey Hartranft Bureau of Waterways Engineering and Wetlands Division of Wetlands Encroachment and Training jhartranft@pa.gov; 717-772-5320 Big Spring Run Restoration Project Background & Monitoring Results Department of Environmental Protection Pennsylvania Pennsylvania Legacy Sediment Workgroup 1
  • 2. 2 • Ecological restoration principles applied to legacy sediment impairments • Big Spring Run test case and monitoring • Geomorphology/physical results • Water quality/chemical results • Living resources/biological results • Cost-effectiveness analysis Presentation Outline
  • 3. Modified from Jacobson and Coleman, 1986 after Walter and Merritts, 2008 3 Legacy sediment Breached dam Very recent inset point bar Breached dam
  • 5. •Intended for use by a wide variety of organizations and people •Specific to aquatic ecosystem restoration projects •Focused on scientific and technical issues US Environmental Protection Agency Washington, DC. 2000. http://www.epa.gov/owow/wetlands/restore/ 5 Principles for the Ecological Restoration of Aquatic Resources (EPA841-F-00-003)
  • 6. • Restoration can be a complex undertaking that integrates a wide range of disciplines • Universities, government agencies, and private organizations may be able to provide useful information and expertise • Complex projects require effective leadership to bring viewpoints, disciplines and styles together as a functional team 6 Principles for the Ecological Restoration of Aquatic Resources (EPA841-F-00-003) Involve multi-disciplinary skills and insights
  • 7. Big Spring Run Legacy Sediment Removal and Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration Project • A multidisciplinary team planned, designed, constructed and monitored this restoration project beginning in 2008 through 2019 • Team members included a wide range of scientific and technical disciplines • Project sponsors included governments, academic institutions, non-profits, landowners and other private entities 7
  • 8. 8 Principles for the Ecological Restoration of Aquatic Resources (EPA841-F-00-003) • Before, during, and after project monitoring is used to evaluate goal and objective achievement • Continuous at Big Spring Run from 2008 through 2019 • Data gathered may be useful for model development and predicting results when scaling up in size 1. developing and defining a new BMP 2. estimating nutrient reductions 3. cost-effectiveness analysis Monitor
  • 9. Courtesy Franklin & Marshall College 9
  • 10. Courtesy Franklin & Marshall College 10
  • 12. The ratio of restoration area to drainage area < 0.5% 0.02 km2 Restoration Area 4.36 km2 Drainage Area 12 2013 NAIP Imagery Watershed and Restoration Area
  • 13. 13 Principles for the Ecological Restoration of Aquatic Resources (EPA841-F-00-003) • Restoration efforts are likely to fail if the sources of degradation persist. • Understanding an ecosystem’s evolutionary trajectory is relevant to correctly diagnosing the problem, as well as to developing restoration approaches that are sustainable. “… understanding the legacy sediment problem is the first step in proposing a fix.” Bay Journal, March, 2007. Alliance for the Chesapeake Bay. Address ongoing causes of degradation.
  • 14. Pre-restoration sediment source identification by landscape position using 137Cs activity in Big Spring Run 14Walter et. al., 2017; Bai 2017 (Franklin & Marshall College Thesis) 0.0E+00 2.0E-03 4.0E-03 6.0E-03 8.0E-03 1.0E-02 1.2E-02 137CsActivity(Bq/g) BSR 137CsActivityby Landscape Position Stream Bank Profile Stream Bank Aggregate Upland Agricultural Soils Suspended Sediment Tile Pads Conclusion: 137Cs radiotopic isotopes from pre-restoration suspended sediment and tile pad deposition are consistent with a sediment source entirely from stream bank erosion Big Spring Run 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 -0.002 0.000 0.002 0.004 0.006 0.008 137 Cs (Bq/g) Depth(cm) Aggregate Activity ~ 1.0 x 10-3 Bq/g. Stream Bank Profile
  • 15. 15 Principles for the Ecological Restoration of Aquatic Resources (EPA841-F-00-003) • Identifying natural reference conditions are essential to ensure project success. • Channels incised through legacy sediment, are not natural analogs in the mid-Atlantic Region (Walter and Merritts, 2008). • Use historic information on altered sites. Utilize a reference condition
  • 16. Basal Gravels/Bedrock Hydric Soil ~ 12-18 inches Photos Courtesy Franklin & Marshall College Big Spring Run In-situ Reference Condition Legacy Sediment 16
  • 17. Typical Legacy Sediment and Eroding Streambank Stratigraphy - West Branch Little Conestoga River Munsell Soil Colors Basal Gravels/Bedrock 10YR 2/2 – Organic Rich Layer 10YR 3/1 – Organic Rich Layer 10Y 4/2 – Thin Gleyed Layer 10YR 5/4 – Legacy Sediment Hydric/Wetland Soils 17
  • 18. Adapted from Hilgartner et. al. 2012 Big Spring Run Carbon-14 Dates and Vascular Plant Seed Macrofossil Analysis 0 cm 170 cm3000 BP 2860 BP 270 BP seed macrofossil sample column 72 cm 160 cm All Dates +/- 40 120 cm 18
  • 19. from Merritts, et. al. 2012 19
  • 20. 20 Principles for the Ecological Restoration of Aquatic Resources (EPA841-F-00-003) • Natural valley morphology • Address legacy sediment storage and erosion • Ecosystem physical characteristics are essential to both form and process restoration • Natural function and natural structure are closely linked to produce successful restoration processes. Restore natural structure Restore natural function
  • 21. Proposed Restoration Conceptual Design Adapted from LandStudies, Inc. Typical Existing Conditions Legacy Sediment Removal and Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration Best Management Practice 21 Flood Flow Legacy Sediment Bedrock Gravel Hydric Paleosol Modern, inset bar Base FlowHydric Paleosol Bedrock Gravel Root Zone Flood Flow Base Flow/Stage 0 Hydric Soil
  • 22. Rapid aggradationLegacy sediment removal and aquatic ecosystem restoration Legacy Sediment bedrock gravels hydric paleosols inset bar Legacy Sediment Stage 5 Big Spring Run Type Cross Section Slow Aggradation Dominant Processes Anastomosing channel – Stage 0 slow aggradation processes bedrock gravel hydric soil hydric soil Natural Wetland Soils Bedrock gravel bedrock “Stage Dam” Cyclical stream evolution model and restoration linked to habitat and ecosystem functions and services Adapted from Cluer and Thorne, 2013 22
  • 23. Artist rendition of restored conditions 23
  • 25. Courtesy Franklin & Marshall College 25 October 2011
  • 27. Big Spring Run As-Built - Hillshade Elevations Legacy Sediment Excavation Limits Legacy Sediment Temporary Stockpiles Courtesy Franklin & Marshall College construction limits High : 359.62 feet Low : 305.39 feet 4.7 Acre Restoration Area 27
  • 28. Pre-Restoration Flow Model Post-Restoration Flow Model Art Parola, Univ. Louisville Dorothy Merritts, F&M Abandoned Oxbows 28 For video link see: http://www.bsrproject.org/visualizations.html
  • 29. 29 Instantaneous storm flow conditions Key Observations: (1) In the restored condition floodwater goes over bank more frequently, at lower flow, and over a greater area. (2) Shear stresses are much lower.
  • 30. Big Spring Run As-Built 30 Courtesy Franklin & Marshall College construction limits High : 359.62 feet Low : 305.39 feet Flood Photo Location and Orientation
  • 31. 31 Big Spring Run post-restoration storm Courtesy Telemonitor, Inc. September 18, 2012 @ 3:30 PM
  • 32. 32 Courtesy Telemonitor, Inc. September 18, 2012 @ 4:00 PM Big Spring Run post-restoration storm
  • 33. 33 Courtesy Telemonitor, Inc. September 18, 2012 @ 4:30 PM Big Spring Run post-restoration storm
  • 34. 34 Courtesy Telemonitor, Inc. September 18, 2012 @ 4:35 PM Big Spring Run post-restoration storm
  • 35. 35 Courtesy Telemonitor, Inc. September 18, 2012 @ 4:45 PM Big Spring Run post-restoration storm
  • 36. 36 Courtesy Telemonitor, Inc. September 18, 2012 @ 5:00 PM Big Spring Run post-restoration storm
  • 37. 37 Courtesy Telemonitor, Inc. September 18, 2012 @ 7:15 PM Big Spring Run post-restoration storm
  • 38. Courtesy Telemonitor, Inc. September 18, 2012 @ 8:30 PM Big Spring Run post-restoration storm 38
  • 39. September 19, 2012 @ 10:00 AM Courtesy Telemonitor, Inc. 39 Big Spring Run post-restoration storm
  • 40. Post-restoration repeat cross section surveys, 2013-2017 Pre-restoration legacy sediment surface 40
  • 41. Deposition (blue), erosion (orange), and net change (aggradation) for seven cross sections surveyed at least twice between 2012-13 and 2015-17. Ft/yr Ft/yr DownstreamPost-restoration repeat cross section survey locations 41
  • 42. Post-restoration terrestrial laser survey April 11, 2014 42 Surface water
  • 43. 43 Post-restoration UAV (drone) image of anastomosing channel form April 22, 2018 Approximate area of view next terrestrial laser survey image
  • 44. 44 Post-restoration terrestrial laser survey April 11, 2014
  • 45. • Small, anastomosing channels were well established by April 2014 - 3 years after restoration. • Terrestrial laser surveys confirmed that the wetland-floodplain surface remained stable from April 2014 through April 2016 and little change in ground elevation has occurred (i.e., erosion is minimal). • Fine sediment (silt size) deposition is occurring within the restoration area over time, but it is localized, mostly along channel edges, and on the order a few centimeters. • Springs that were daylighted when legacy sediment was removed became pools of water connecting small channels that were well established by April 2014. 45 Summary of post-restoration geomorphic monitoring
  • 46. U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey Pennsylvania Water Science Center This information is preliminary and is subject to revision. It is being provided to meet the need for timely best science. The information is provided on the condition that neither the U.S. Geological Survey nor the U.S. Government shall be held liable for any damages resulting from the authorized or unauthorized use of the information. Effects of legacy-sediment removal on nutrients and sediment in Big Spring Run, Lancaster County, Pennsylvania, 2009-15 In cooperation with the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection and in collaboration with Franklin and Marshall College and the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency 46
  • 47. USGS Sample Sites Stream gage locations Flow direction 47
  • 48. Preliminary Information-Subject to Revision. Not for Citation or Distribution. Surface Water Pre- and post- restoration suspended sediment concentrations (SSC) in Big Spring Run 48
  • 49. Preliminary Information-Subject to Revision. Not for Citation or Distribution. Discrete and continuous methods for computing SSC loads in Big Spring Run 49
  • 50. 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 71% Pre-restoration Post-restoration USGS Water Year Annual suspended sediment load for 2008 through 2015 water years 50
  • 51. Preliminary Information-Subject to Revision. Not for Citation or Distribution. Pre- and post- restoration unfiltered total phosphorous concentrations in Big Spring Run 51
  • 52. Preliminary Information-Subject to Revision. Not for Citation or Distribution. Pre- and post-restoration SSC at USGS site 015765195 (WY2009-15) and at two sites from Galeone and others (2006) 52
  • 53. U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey References Langland, M.J., 2019, Data in support of study evaluating effects of legacy-sediment removal on nutrients and sediment in Big Spring Run, Lancaster County, Pennsylvania, 2009-15: U.S. Geological Survey data release, https://doi.org/10.5066/F7GH9G5K Langland, M.J., Duris, J.W., Zimmerman, T.M., and Chaplin, J.J., in press, Effects of legacy-sediment removal and effects on nutrients and sediment in Big Spring Run, Lancaster County, Pennsylvania, 2009-15: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report Preliminary Information-Subject to Revision. Not for Citation or Distribution. 53
  • 54. • Median suspended sediment concentrations decreased from 556 mg/L to 74 mg/L representing an 87% reduction from pre- to post- restoration. • The suspended sediment load decreased by 71% (600 tons per year) from pre- to post- restoration. • Total phosphorus concentrations decreased from 0.19 mg/L to 0.04 mg/L representing a 79% reduction from pre- to post- restoration. • Legacy sediment removal and aquatic ecosystem restoration was 10.5 times more effective in reducing suspended sediment than other agricultural best management practices that included a combination of streambank fencing and cattle crossings. 54 Summary of USGS surface water quality monitoring
  • 55. Restoring stream-floodplain connection with legacy sediment removal increases denitrification and nitrate retention, Big Spring Run, PA USA. Kenneth J. Forshay1, Julie Weitzman2, Jessica Wilhelm3, Paul Mayer4, Ann Keeley1, Dorothy Merritts5, and Robert Walter5 (1)Office of Research and Development, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Ada, OK, (2)Carrey Institute, (3)Oak Ridge Affiliated Universities(4) Office of Research and Development United states Environmental Protection Agency, Corvallis, OR, (5) Franklin and Marshall College This presentation contains research done by EPA staff and does not necessarily reflect EPA policy Office of Research and Development NRMRL, Groundwater, Watershed,and Ecosystem Restoration Division, Ecosystem and Subsurface Protection Branch
  • 56. 56
  • 57. Surface water nitrate decreased gradually. Pre-restoration Pre-restorationPost-restoration Post-restoration
  • 58. Groundwater nitrate decreased in the fourth year after restoration. Pre-restoration Post-restoration
  • 59. High C:N is an indicator of nitrate reduction and GW connectivity. Pre-restoration Post-restoration
  • 60. Sediment C and N recovered simultaneously. Pre- restoration Pre- restoration Post-restoration Post-restoration
  • 61. Post restoration nitrate loads are smaller than pre-restoration. Load = [NO3] x Mean Daily Discharge 60±4 kg day-1 n=33 Pre restoration (2008-2011) 41±3 kg day-1 n=44 Post restoration (2012-2016) p<0.001 df = 76
  • 62. Soil extractable P is lower. Pre-restoration Post-restoration
  • 63. Downstream dissolved P is lower post restoration. Pre-restoration Post-restoration
  • 64. • Nitrate retention primarily is driven by enhancement of organic carbon and resulting bio-geochemical processes at Big Spring Run • The restoration improved nitrate retention, but it took several years for that trend to emerge in response to the maturation of the wetland complex • Nitrogen and phosphorous fluxes are reduced when comparing the pre- restoration and post- restoration periods 64 Summary of USEPA surface & ground water quality monitoring
  • 65. August 2012 65 Big Spring Run biological and living resources monitoring results
  • 66. 2011: pre-restoration Navicula gregaria Navicula reichardtiana Nitzschia palea s.l. Diatom assemblages similar to those found in 1948 in relatively “healthy” Lancaster County streams. Nitzschia cf. gessneri Potapova, et al, 2016 66
  • 67. Figure 1.2. Scanning electron microscopy images of the common diatoms from BSR samples. A– Achnanthidium minutissimum, B – A. saprophilum, C – Eolimna minima, D – Amphora pediculus, E – Cocconeis placentula, F – Melosira varians, G- Navicula antonii, H – Surirella lacrimula, I – Thalassiosira weissflogii, J – Nitzschia dissipata, K – Hippodonta pseudacceptata, L- Gomphonema parvulum var. saprophilum, M – Craticula subminuscula, N- Nitzschia palea, O – Gyrosigma obtusatum. Common diatoms from Big Spring Run Potapova, et al, 2016 67
  • 68. • Before the 1700s, Big Spring Run was inhabited by diverse diatom communities that are known to prefer slow-moving clean waters with abundant vegetation and wetlands. • Diatom diversity increased after restoration based on mean species richness in the restored reach. The increase in species richness may be attributed to enhanced habitat complexity that provides a greater diversity of substrates and flow conditions. • Diatom nutrient metrics indicated that post-restoration assemblages had fewer diatoms associated with high nutrients and more of those indicative of low nutrients. • It is unrealistic to expect the biota to revert to its pre-1700s condition given the existing water quality, but increased diversity and higher proportion of oligotraphenic species is a benefit and positive ecosystem recovery trajectory. 68
  • 69. Courtesy D. Bowne Elizabethtown College Restored habitat where green frog egg mass was found. Eurycea bislineata (Northern two-lined) and Pseudotriton ruber (Northern red) larvae Lithobates clamitans (Green frog) tadpole Green frog egg mass 69
  • 70. -0.50 0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Meancapturesperuniteffort Restored Not Restored Figure 2. The mean number of captures per unit effort (± STD) of Eurycea bislineata for restored and not restored stream segments from 2011 to 2016. All of the data from 2011 are pre-restoration. The mean number of captures did not significantly vary by year or treatment. Bowne, D.R., and Conway, R. In prep. Amphibian Use of a Restored Wetland in an Agricultural Landscape. Department of Biology, Elizabethtown College, PA. 70
  • 71. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nnxhs3aTTJs “SRBC Water Tour 2017” excerpts Courtesy Susquehanna River Basin Commission, 2017 71
  • 72. September 2015 Fish Survey rosyside dace (Clinostomus funduloides) This species prefers headwater streams typical of cold water fishes and is an indication of improved water quality in the restored reach. It also prefers gravelly riffles for spawning and typically inhabits rocky streams. Native Range 72
  • 73. Courtesy William Hilgartner 73 Vascular plant surveys of 1 m2 plots at 5 m intervals repeated along transects Pre-restoration Post-restoration
  • 74. Vascular plant species richness and wetland indicator status 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Native Non- Native N=21 N=86 N=85 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% FAC, FACW, OBL FACU, UPL, NI N=21 N=86 N=85 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% OBL N=21 N=86 N=85 74
  • 75. Notable post-restoration vascular plant colonizers USDA Plant database Juncus torreyi Torrey’s rush PA State Threatened Facultative Carex amphibola narrowleaf sedge Facultative http://phytoimages.siu.edu J. Hartranft 2015 J. Hartranft 2015 75
  • 76. 76 Post-restoration terrestrial laser survey June 6, 2015 High Trees Low Grasses Plant Canopy Height
  • 77. 77 Summary of biological and living resources monitoring • Diatom diversity increased after restoration based on mean species richness. The increase in species richness may be attributed to enhanced habitat complexity that now provides a greater diversity of channel substrates and flow conditions. • Diatom nutrient metrics indicated that post-restoration assemblages had fewer diatoms associated with high nutrients and more of those indicative of low nutrients. • Northern two-lined salamanders (E. bislineata) captures have consistently increased in the restoration area while its captures in adjacent unrestored areas have fluctuated. • While green frog (L. clamitans) is a nationally common frog species, it was found residing and breeding in the restored areas after restoration but was previously absent.
  • 78. 78 Summary of biological and living resources monitoring (cont.) • A major vascular plant community shift occurred from a dry upland pasture to a wet meadow plant community type • Increasing importance of vascular plant hydrophytes after restoration provides diverse wetland habitat that is comparable to the reference condition • Vascular plant hydrophytes have colonized the restoration area, including the PA Threatened Torrey’s sedge (Juncus torreyi) • The presence of threatened and endangered species indicates Exceptional value wetlands in accordance with 25 PA Code § 105.17 Wetlands have been restored
  • 79. Flemming, et. al. 2019 Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 79
  • 80. 80Flemming, et. al. 2019 Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
  • 81. 81Flemming, et. al. 2019 Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
  • 82. 82Flemming, et. al. 2019 Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
  • 83. Dr. Dorothy Merritts, Franklin and Marshall College Dr. Robert Walter, Franklin and Marshall College Michael Rahnis, Franklin and Marshall College U.S. Geological Survey; Michael Langland, Joe Duris, Tammy Zimmerman and Jeff Chaplin U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; Kenneth Forshay, Julie Weitzman, Jessica Wilhelm, Paul Mayer, Ann Keeley LandStudies Incorporated, Lititz PA Dr. Art Parola, University of Louisville Dr. David Bowne, Elizabethtown College Dr. Marina Potapova, Drexel University Dr. Patrick Flemming, Water Science Institute & Franklin and Marshall College Susquehanna River Basin Commission, Jamie Shallenberger Joseph Sweeney, Water Science Institute 83 Presentation Contributors
  • 84. Questions ? Contact Information Jeffrey Hartranft Bureau of Waterways Engineering and Wetlands Division of Wetlands Encroachment and Training jhartranft@pa.gov 717-772-5320 84