City, Innovation, and Arts:
                          The Case of Bangkok

Dr. Pun-Arj Chairatana
Dr. Apiwat Ratanawaraha

CISASIA Project

www.cisasia.net
Converging City, Foresight, and
Innovation: Thailand Experience


2006: Coining City Foresight            2009: Developing City                    2010: Merging City Foresight
framework                               Innovation Concept and City              to City Innovation
                                        Innovation System:
•Location: The 1400 Years old town:                                              •Scenario building: Six Mega cities in
 Two municipalities along River Ping.   •Locations: Six Mega cities in SE         SE including , Bangkok,, Singapore,
 Lampoon., Northern Thailand             including , Bangkok,, Singapore, Ho      Ho Chi Minh City, Kuala Lumpur,
                                         Chi Minh City, Kuala Lumpur, Jakarta,    Jakarta, and Manila. (Project
                                         and Manila. (Project supported by        supported by IDRC)
                                         IDRC)
2006 * Lampoon City Foresight
The First City Foresight in Thailand

                             Scenario 1: A Bitter
                             Prosperity
                             Scenario 2: Global
                             Village Lampoon
                             Scenario 3:
                             International
                             Lampoon
                             Scenario 4:
                             Lampoon Green
                             Knowledge Town
2009 Defining City Innovation
               and Systems
Figure 2: City Innovation and City Innovation Systems (CISs)                   A new or
                                                                              improved
     Conventional                                         Alternative           solution
  innovation systems       City innovation            innovation systems          that
     (Institutions)                                        (Spaces)
                                                                             contributes
        Research and         Product innovation
         Technology
     Organization (RTOs)
                                                          Physical space        towards
                             Process innovation
                                                                              enhanced
                             Position innovation
        Private firms
                            Paradigm innovation
                                                         Information space    liveability,
                           Institutional innovation
                                                                             prosperity,
        Government
                             Service innovation
                                                          Cognitive space    and equity
                                                                             of the city.”
2010 Bangkok City Innovation System Foresight
                 Towards Liveable, Prosperity, and Equity 2030




                 Product




Services                    Process




                  City
               innovation


Institution                 Position           City
                                            innovator


                Paradigm
Bangkok and City Innovation

                                  Bangkok City
 Macro                             Innovation
                                     System




 Meso                Aesthetic
                    innovation
                                                 Creative
                                                 Economy



                               Art led           Creative
 Micro     Temporal
         Intervention
                             Community
                            Revitalization
                                                 industry
                                                 mapping
Rirkrit Triravanich’s Padthai, 2004   Spider Shack, 2008




Case 1: Temporal Intervention,
The City Innovation for Public Arts in Bangkok
Led by Dr. Khaisri Paksukcharern
Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
Introduction
    Based on a research paper on
    The city innovation of public arts in Bangkok.
    Main Findings:
   - ‘Temporality’, ‘Transience’, ‘Fun’
     are the innovative concepts recently employed in the
    contemporary public art intervention in the city.
   - New forms of ‘Participative Art’ and ‘Community Art’
   - In relation to the latest urban policies of ‘inner city regeneration
    especially at the scale of ‘community revitalization’.
   - An increasing support of public and private sector in partnership.
   - The city innovation for public arts in Bangkok is evidenced
      in two types of inner urban areas;
        * contemporary public spaces in the city
          such as shopping malls and transit spaces
        * local community and neighborhoods
PUBLIC ART:
varied and ambiguous definitions
   - public art is the art outside conventional art spaces such as
     museums or galleries.
                 ‘site-specific’, an art created and installed in a given site
                 or the design of a site as an art itself
                 ‘site-general’, an already created art object is chosen
                 to be placed in a site.
   - the concept of ‘public’ can be difficult and makes the status
     of public art become more ambiguous in the case that the
     definition of public is not necessarily bounded by space.
   - ‘Art in public sites’ brings about encounters and coexistence
      of people and subsequently leads to urban livability.
   - In this research, as art in public spaces has had a long history
      from being in art institutions in relation to public open spaces of
      the city, it will trace public art related to both inside and outside
      conventional art spaces.
PUBLIC ART AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT:
the concept of ‘livable city’ and ‘urban aesthetics’
- 1980s: The concept of ‘livable city’ in relation to ‘urban aesthetic’
    especially through pedestrian points of view
-   1990s: Discussions on public art and its supporting role to reclaim
     the ‘public-ness’ of open spaces in cities
-   In the context of urban decay, public art played a significant role to
    entail a re-visioning of public spaces and how they should be used
-   and by whom.
-   There has been a continuous and interrelated development between
    public arts and urban spaces: the solutions of how both could adapt
    and make use of each other in order to sustain the right balance
    of intervention.




                    TALA Exhibition: Central World Plaza, 2009
Location of Art Institutions and Commercial Spaces in Bangkok
   with urban attraction places

                                      - 56 private art galleries
                                      - 62 museums
                                        on archeology, anthropology, history,
                                        science, natural sciences and etc
                                      - 2 types of art galleries:
                                      - very few number of visitors.
                                        * 74% has never visited art galleries
                                             - 31% no news 31%
                                             - 13.5% exhibition changing too
                                               quickly
                                             - 41.5% heard the news but
                                               never been interested
                                             - 11% heard the news and interested
                                               but not available
                                             - 3% heard the news and interested
                                               but not confident
                                      - All pure art galleries have less than
                                        10,000 visitors / year




Source: W.Teerachaisuppakit, 2002
Le Fete Bangkok at Gaysorn Plaza, 2007


THE FIRST INNOVATION:
 the concepts of temporality,
 transience and fun
 of Participative art
 in CBD area
- An innovative attempt to place public arts
 with the shopping malls and
 transport interchange spaces
 such as BTS skywalks in CBD areas



Spider Shack:
Siam Discovery Center
2008




                                                                       TALA Exhibition: Central World Plaza, 2009


                                        Overhead Nightclub,
Central Shopping, Chang Wattana, 2008   Siam Discovery Center, 2007
Frequencies of public art exhibitions / events in Bangkok
categorized by 2 space types (2006-2010)




  The record of these contemporary public art event in Bangkok
  from 2006-2010 on shows that the CBD areas of Rachaprasong
  and Pathumwan, the commercial and mass transit hub of Bangkok;
         * attracts most art events in the spaces attached
           or en-route to shopping malls and transit stations.
         * exhibits art outdoor or outside the conventional art spaces.
Distribution of public art exhibitions / events in Bangkok
categorized by 4 art types and 2 space types (2006-2010)




(cont.)
* exhibits art outdoor or outside the conventional art spaces.
* attracts the most participative forms of art ie, installation and performance..
In the Nut Shell
- The city innovation of public arts in Bangkok involves
  new forms of art, urban spaces and their development strategies.
- A strong potential to reinvigorate Thai traditional artistic-practices
  as well as to bring art to the public again.
- Participative Art in the CBD and Community Art in local neighborhood:
  the first step to redefine art in Thailand.
- Bringing art out of galleries to streets and disrupted the flow of daily life. - To actually
connect the urban dwellers as well as the local community
  to the livable city and urban aesthetic projects
  through the exploration of how art can be used as an expression
  of identity in everyday life.
- The innovation for public art is to engage with the public not
  the didactic presentation.
- The concept of daily life, common routine, temporal but regular
  intervention is surely different from the west.
- The real challenge is that how public art could be more than
  a one time event, how to make the community react
  and the pubic participate and become the norm than the exception.
ART-LED COMMUNITY REVITALIZATION:
THE CASE OF KUDEEJEEN NEIGHBORHOOD, BANGKOK
Led by Dr. Niramon Kulsrisombat
Department of Urban and Regional Planning, Chulalongkorn University
CIS-ASIA Project
Bangkok, with its long history and diverse
culture
                       • Old neighborhoods going
                         through significant
                         changes
                          – Changing social structure
                          – Decay of physical environ
                          – Lack of investment from
                            the private and public
                            sectors
                          – Though still lively,
                            compared to most
                            American cities, they are in
                            the decline
Research Methodology

                       • The Case Study of Kudeejeen
                         Neighborhood and
                         Kudeejeen-Silptamtrok
                         (KS) Art Festival (27-28
                         March 2010)
                       • Action research
                       • Questionnaire survey
                       • Interview
                       • Participatory observation
Site Context

                                         • Long history since late 17C
                                         • Cultural diversity from 3
                                           religions and 6 ethnic groups
                                         • Wat-Baan urban structure
                                         • Cultural Heritage Mapping
                                           Project by Association of
                                           Siamese Architects (ASA) since
                                           2008
                                         • Problems:
                                           -     Lack of investment from
                                                 public and private sectors
                                           -     Changing community
                                                 structure
                                           -     Physical decay
                                           -     Limited awareness of
                                                 cultural heritage
Cultural map of Kudeejeen neighborhood     -     Limited participation in
                                                 public issues
Kudeejeen-Silptamtrok Art Festival map
Festival preparation by community members and volunteers
Analyzing the systems of city innovations

• KS Festival has been successful as community revitalizing
  tool by:
  -    Increase level community participation through art and cultural
       activities
  -    Increase awareness of community members towards their
       cultural heritage
  -    Increase awareness of potential partners towards the value of
       Kudeejeen Neighborhoods
• Key actors:
  -    ASA (core organization)
  -    Community leaders (community mobilizer)
  -    Abbots / Priest / Imam (community mobilizer)
• Interaction among actors:
  -    Community level and traditional social structure (Wat-Baan)
  -    Less involvement from city government, local government and
       Thonburi District Cultural Council
Analyzing the systems of city innovations

• Challenges in the sustainability of the project:
  -   Lack of effective institution to merge community-based project
      into formal planning system
  -   Strong top-down in cultural policy
  -   Different notion on “art and culture”



Next step
• Interview with community leaders and other stakeholders
• Questionnaire survey after the 2nd KS art festival in November, 2010
What will be the Future?
• More city innovation case studies and
  comparative studies
• More understanding on the relationship
  and interface between innovation and the
  city
• What will be the key characteristics among
  different levels of city innovation?
• How city innovator create, develop,
  diffuse, and learn in the city?
Thank You

Bangkok city innovation

  • 1.
    City, Innovation, andArts: The Case of Bangkok Dr. Pun-Arj Chairatana Dr. Apiwat Ratanawaraha CISASIA Project www.cisasia.net
  • 2.
    Converging City, Foresight,and Innovation: Thailand Experience 2006: Coining City Foresight 2009: Developing City 2010: Merging City Foresight framework Innovation Concept and City to City Innovation Innovation System: •Location: The 1400 Years old town: •Scenario building: Six Mega cities in Two municipalities along River Ping. •Locations: Six Mega cities in SE SE including , Bangkok,, Singapore, Lampoon., Northern Thailand including , Bangkok,, Singapore, Ho Ho Chi Minh City, Kuala Lumpur, Chi Minh City, Kuala Lumpur, Jakarta, Jakarta, and Manila. (Project and Manila. (Project supported by supported by IDRC) IDRC)
  • 3.
    2006 * LampoonCity Foresight The First City Foresight in Thailand Scenario 1: A Bitter Prosperity Scenario 2: Global Village Lampoon Scenario 3: International Lampoon Scenario 4: Lampoon Green Knowledge Town
  • 4.
    2009 Defining CityInnovation and Systems Figure 2: City Innovation and City Innovation Systems (CISs) A new or improved Conventional Alternative solution innovation systems City innovation innovation systems that (Institutions) (Spaces) contributes Research and Product innovation Technology Organization (RTOs) Physical space towards Process innovation enhanced Position innovation Private firms Paradigm innovation Information space liveability, Institutional innovation prosperity, Government Service innovation Cognitive space and equity of the city.”
  • 5.
    2010 Bangkok CityInnovation System Foresight Towards Liveable, Prosperity, and Equity 2030 Product Services Process City innovation Institution Position City innovator Paradigm
  • 6.
    Bangkok and CityInnovation Bangkok City Macro Innovation System Meso Aesthetic innovation Creative Economy Art led Creative Micro Temporal Intervention Community Revitalization industry mapping
  • 7.
    Rirkrit Triravanich’s Padthai,2004 Spider Shack, 2008 Case 1: Temporal Intervention, The City Innovation for Public Arts in Bangkok Led by Dr. Khaisri Paksukcharern Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
  • 8.
    Introduction Based on a research paper on The city innovation of public arts in Bangkok. Main Findings: - ‘Temporality’, ‘Transience’, ‘Fun’ are the innovative concepts recently employed in the contemporary public art intervention in the city. - New forms of ‘Participative Art’ and ‘Community Art’ - In relation to the latest urban policies of ‘inner city regeneration especially at the scale of ‘community revitalization’. - An increasing support of public and private sector in partnership. - The city innovation for public arts in Bangkok is evidenced in two types of inner urban areas; * contemporary public spaces in the city such as shopping malls and transit spaces * local community and neighborhoods
  • 9.
    PUBLIC ART: varied andambiguous definitions - public art is the art outside conventional art spaces such as museums or galleries. ‘site-specific’, an art created and installed in a given site or the design of a site as an art itself ‘site-general’, an already created art object is chosen to be placed in a site. - the concept of ‘public’ can be difficult and makes the status of public art become more ambiguous in the case that the definition of public is not necessarily bounded by space. - ‘Art in public sites’ brings about encounters and coexistence of people and subsequently leads to urban livability. - In this research, as art in public spaces has had a long history from being in art institutions in relation to public open spaces of the city, it will trace public art related to both inside and outside conventional art spaces.
  • 10.
    PUBLIC ART ANDURBAN DEVELOPMENT: the concept of ‘livable city’ and ‘urban aesthetics’ - 1980s: The concept of ‘livable city’ in relation to ‘urban aesthetic’ especially through pedestrian points of view - 1990s: Discussions on public art and its supporting role to reclaim the ‘public-ness’ of open spaces in cities - In the context of urban decay, public art played a significant role to entail a re-visioning of public spaces and how they should be used - and by whom. - There has been a continuous and interrelated development between public arts and urban spaces: the solutions of how both could adapt and make use of each other in order to sustain the right balance of intervention. TALA Exhibition: Central World Plaza, 2009
  • 11.
    Location of ArtInstitutions and Commercial Spaces in Bangkok with urban attraction places - 56 private art galleries - 62 museums on archeology, anthropology, history, science, natural sciences and etc - 2 types of art galleries: - very few number of visitors. * 74% has never visited art galleries - 31% no news 31% - 13.5% exhibition changing too quickly - 41.5% heard the news but never been interested - 11% heard the news and interested but not available - 3% heard the news and interested but not confident - All pure art galleries have less than 10,000 visitors / year Source: W.Teerachaisuppakit, 2002
  • 12.
    Le Fete Bangkokat Gaysorn Plaza, 2007 THE FIRST INNOVATION: the concepts of temporality, transience and fun of Participative art in CBD area - An innovative attempt to place public arts with the shopping malls and transport interchange spaces such as BTS skywalks in CBD areas Spider Shack: Siam Discovery Center 2008 TALA Exhibition: Central World Plaza, 2009 Overhead Nightclub, Central Shopping, Chang Wattana, 2008 Siam Discovery Center, 2007
  • 13.
    Frequencies of publicart exhibitions / events in Bangkok categorized by 2 space types (2006-2010) The record of these contemporary public art event in Bangkok from 2006-2010 on shows that the CBD areas of Rachaprasong and Pathumwan, the commercial and mass transit hub of Bangkok; * attracts most art events in the spaces attached or en-route to shopping malls and transit stations. * exhibits art outdoor or outside the conventional art spaces.
  • 14.
    Distribution of publicart exhibitions / events in Bangkok categorized by 4 art types and 2 space types (2006-2010) (cont.) * exhibits art outdoor or outside the conventional art spaces. * attracts the most participative forms of art ie, installation and performance..
  • 15.
    In the NutShell - The city innovation of public arts in Bangkok involves new forms of art, urban spaces and their development strategies. - A strong potential to reinvigorate Thai traditional artistic-practices as well as to bring art to the public again. - Participative Art in the CBD and Community Art in local neighborhood: the first step to redefine art in Thailand. - Bringing art out of galleries to streets and disrupted the flow of daily life. - To actually connect the urban dwellers as well as the local community to the livable city and urban aesthetic projects through the exploration of how art can be used as an expression of identity in everyday life. - The innovation for public art is to engage with the public not the didactic presentation. - The concept of daily life, common routine, temporal but regular intervention is surely different from the west. - The real challenge is that how public art could be more than a one time event, how to make the community react and the pubic participate and become the norm than the exception.
  • 16.
    ART-LED COMMUNITY REVITALIZATION: THECASE OF KUDEEJEEN NEIGHBORHOOD, BANGKOK Led by Dr. Niramon Kulsrisombat Department of Urban and Regional Planning, Chulalongkorn University CIS-ASIA Project
  • 17.
    Bangkok, with itslong history and diverse culture • Old neighborhoods going through significant changes – Changing social structure – Decay of physical environ – Lack of investment from the private and public sectors – Though still lively, compared to most American cities, they are in the decline
  • 18.
    Research Methodology • The Case Study of Kudeejeen Neighborhood and Kudeejeen-Silptamtrok (KS) Art Festival (27-28 March 2010) • Action research • Questionnaire survey • Interview • Participatory observation
  • 19.
    Site Context • Long history since late 17C • Cultural diversity from 3 religions and 6 ethnic groups • Wat-Baan urban structure • Cultural Heritage Mapping Project by Association of Siamese Architects (ASA) since 2008 • Problems: - Lack of investment from public and private sectors - Changing community structure - Physical decay - Limited awareness of cultural heritage Cultural map of Kudeejeen neighborhood - Limited participation in public issues
  • 20.
  • 21.
    Festival preparation bycommunity members and volunteers
  • 23.
    Analyzing the systemsof city innovations • KS Festival has been successful as community revitalizing tool by: - Increase level community participation through art and cultural activities - Increase awareness of community members towards their cultural heritage - Increase awareness of potential partners towards the value of Kudeejeen Neighborhoods • Key actors: - ASA (core organization) - Community leaders (community mobilizer) - Abbots / Priest / Imam (community mobilizer) • Interaction among actors: - Community level and traditional social structure (Wat-Baan) - Less involvement from city government, local government and Thonburi District Cultural Council
  • 24.
    Analyzing the systemsof city innovations • Challenges in the sustainability of the project: - Lack of effective institution to merge community-based project into formal planning system - Strong top-down in cultural policy - Different notion on “art and culture” Next step • Interview with community leaders and other stakeholders • Questionnaire survey after the 2nd KS art festival in November, 2010
  • 25.
    What will bethe Future? • More city innovation case studies and comparative studies • More understanding on the relationship and interface between innovation and the city • What will be the key characteristics among different levels of city innovation? • How city innovator create, develop, diffuse, and learn in the city?
  • 26.