This document summarizes key aspects of the U.S. Constitution as it relates to business regulation and taxation. It outlines the three branches of government established in Articles I-III and how they check each other's powers. It then discusses the Commerce Clause and how the Supreme Court has interpreted Congress's ability to regulate interstate and foreign commerce over time. The document also examines state powers to regulate and tax businesses operating across state lines and the requirements for valid state economic regulations and taxes.

1. © 2015 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted
to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Chapter 5
Business and the
Constitution
Its Legal, Ethical, and
Global Environment
Marianne M. Jennings
BUSINESS
10th Ed.

2. © 2015 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted
to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
5-1
The U.S. Constitution
• Article I: Legislative Branch
– Congress
• House of Representatives
• Senate
• Article II: Executive Branch
– President
– Vice President
• Article III: Judicial Branch
– Creates U.S. Supreme Court
– Authorizes Congress to create other courts

3. © 2015 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted
to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
5-2
The U.S. Constitution
• Creates a System of Checks and
Balances
– Each branch has some power check over
the others to keep any one from
becoming too powerful
– Examples
• Nixon v. Administrator of General Services
• Clinton v. Jones
• Obama v. Alito

4. © 2015 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted
to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
5-3
The U.S. Constitution
• Other Articles in the Constitution
– Article IV: State Interrelationships
– Article V: Procedures for Amendments
– Article VI: Supremacy Clause
– Article VII: State Ratification of the
Constitution

5. © 2015 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted
to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
5-4
The U.S. Constitution
• Bill of Rights
– First: Freedom of speech
– Fourth: Privacy
– Fifth: Due process and self-
incrimination
– Sixth: Jury trial
• Other Amendments
– Fourteenth Amendment: Due Process
and Equal Protection

6. © 2015 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted
to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
5-5
Role of Judicial Review
• Determines the Rights Afforded by
the U.S. Constitution
• Determines the Scope of Rights
• Plays Unique Role in Checks and
Balances
– Determines the appropriateness of the
actions of other branches

7. © 2015 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted
to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
5-6
Limits of Economic Regulation
• The Commerce Clause: Article I, Section 8
– Standards for Federal Regulation of Interstate
Commerce
– Historical application
• Initially, Court gave a narrow interpretation
• Court held New Deal Legislation unconstitutional
• Roosevelt proposed Court-Packing Plan
• After these political battles, the court responded in
NLRB v. Laughlin Steel with the affectation
doctrine

8. © 2015 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted
to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
5-7
Limits of Economic Regulation
A. Economic Activity
is an Economic
Setting
e.g., Price Fixing by
Multinationals
B. Economic Activity
in a Non-Economic
Setting
e.g., Loan Sharking on the
Street Corner
C. Non-Economic
Activity in an
Economic Setting
e.g., Race Discrimination by
a Hotel
D. Non-Economic
Activity in a Non-
Economic Setting
e.g., VAWA and Morrison?

9. © 2015 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted
to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
5-8
Table One – Part A
A. COMPARISON OF CONGRESSIONAL
JURISDICTION FACTORS
CHILD LABOR WOMEN AND VIOLENCE
1. AWFUL; HORRIBLE 1. AWFUL; HORRIBLE
2. PERVASIVE 2. PERVASIVE
3. INSUFFICIENT 3. INSUFFICIENT
STATE ACTION STATE ACTION
4. BUSINESSES 4. MEN ARE DOING IT
WERE DOING IT

10. © 2015 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted
to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
5-9
Table One – Part B
B. CIVIL RIGHTS (LACK THEREOF)
CHILD LABOR GUNS IN SCHOOLS
1. DISPARATE 1. VIOLENCE IS AWFUL
2. UNSAFE–VIOLENCE 2. UNSAFE–VIOLENCE
3. INSUFFICIENT 3. INSUFFICIENT
STATE ACTION STATE ACTION
4. BUSINESSES 4. HIGH SCHOOL
WERE DOING IT STUDENTS DOING IT

11. © 2015 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted
to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
5-10
Table Two
The Factors of Wickard v. Filburn
Local Farmers
Individuals, But Still in Business
Local Commerce Affects Prices in National Market
National Economic Interest in Farm Products/Pricing
Combining Wickard with the decisions in Lopez and Morrison,
we are able to develop a clear matrix on the Commerce Clause as
depicted by Response to Razook Figure One and the specific
examples listed in Razook Figure Two.
In the Lopez case, the court held that the act of having a gun on
school property had no economic/commerce base and that federal
laws could not regulate local school.

12. © 2015 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted
to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
5-11
Response to Razook Figure One
Congress May Regulated conduct Regulated conduct
Regulate is economic is performed by an
(commercial (commercial
character) character to actor)
Congress May Regulated conduct Regulated conduct
Not Regulate is non-economic is not performed by
an economic entity
(non-commercial
character)
Jennings Figure R-1
Examples of Congressional Authority/Non-Authority After
Morrison and Lopez
Congress
may
regulate
Congress
may not
regulate
Congress
may
regulate

13. © 2015 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted
to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
5-12
Table Three
Application of the Economic/Non-Economic Actor/
Activity Test to Specific Regulations
Gun Possession
Gun possessor (actor) – non-commercial, Congress may not regulate
Act of gun possession – non-commercial, Congress may not regulate
Violence Against Women
Abuser (actor) – non-commercial, Congress may not regulate
Act of abusing – non-commercial, Congress may not regulate
Farm Regulation (Wickard v. Filburn)
Farmer (actor) – commercial (livelihood), Congress may regulate
Act of selling – commercial, Congress may regulate

14. © 2015 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted
to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
5-13
Table Three (cont’d)
Title VII Civil Rights Discrimination
Hotel/Restaurant Owner (actor) – commercial, Congress may
regulate
Act of discrimination – non-commercial, Congress may regulate
Labor/Unions/OSHA
Actors are business – commercial, Congress may regulate
Or Unions Engaged in Business – commercial, Congress may
regulate
Act of Work/Employment – commercial, Congress may regulate
Lending (loan sharking)
Actors are loan sharks – commercial, Congress may regulate
(Facilities are not great, but they are a source of loans)
Act of lending – commercial, Congress may regulate

15. © 2015 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted
to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
5-14
Limits of Economic Regulation
• Case 5.1 National Federation of
Independent Business v. Sebelius
(2012)
– The court found that the individual
mandate violated the Commerce Clause
– Court upheld the law on other grounds

16. © 2015 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted
to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
5-15
Limits of Economic Regulation
• The Commerce Clause: Article I, Section 8
– Standards for state regulation of commerce
• If Congress has regulated, there is an overriding
concern about the Supremacy Clause
• If Congress has not acted, there is a benefit/burden
analysis
• Balance police power (state’s interest in regulation)
with the burden on commerce
• State law cannot give in-state businesses an
advantage

17. © 2015 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted
to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
5-16
Limits of Economic Regulation
• Case 5.2 Granholm v. Heald (2005)
– Michigan and New York regulate the sale and
importation of alcoholic beverages
– Three-tier distribution system
– Separate licenses are required for producers,
wholesalers, and retailers
– Out-of-state producers cannot sell directly to
consumers
– Out-of-state wine producers are required to pay
wholesaler fees and cannot compete (price-wise) with
in-state wine producers on direct-to-consumer sales

18. © 2015 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted
to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
5-17
Limits of Economic Regulation
• Congressional Regulation of Foreign
Commerce
– The power of Congress to regulate
foreign commerce applies regardless of
where it begins and ends

19. © 2015 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted
to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
5-18
Taxation of Business
• Congress’ Power to Tax – Article I,
Section 8: The Ability of Congress to
Tax Has Been Consistently Upheld
• State and Local Taxation of Interstate
Commerce
– Interstate business is not exempt from
state and local taxes just because they
are interstate businesses

20. © 2015 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted
to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
5-19
Taxation of Business
• Requirements for Valid State Tax
– Tax cannot discriminate against
interstate commerce
– Tax cannot be an undue burden on
interstate commerce

21. © 2015 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted
to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
5-20
• Requirements for Valid State Tax
– Must be a “sufficient nexus” between the state
and the business being taxed
• Examples: Does business there, holds property
titles there, manufactures there, inventory stored
there
– Must be apportioned fairly
• Example: A corporation doing business in fifty
states cannot have all income taxed in all fifty
states – must be apportioned according to its
revenues in the states
Taxation of Business

22. © 2015 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted
to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
5-21
• Case 5.3 Quill Corporation v. North
Dakota (1992)
– How did Quill come to have customers
in North Dakota?
– Is there a difference between pamphlets
in a state and salespeople in that state?
Taxation of Business

23. © 2015 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted
to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
5-22
State vs. Federal Regulation
• The Supremacy Clause and
Preemption
– Article VI exists to determine which
laws control in the event both state and
federal governments regulate the same
thing
– If state law directly conflicts with
federal law, state law is invalid

24. © 2015 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted
to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
5-23
• The Supremacy Clause and Preemption
– Whether there is preemption is controlled
by answering several questions:
• What does legislative history provide?
• What is the level of detail in the federal
regulation?
• What benefit flows from the federal
regulation?
• What is the nature of conflict—can the two
laws survive?
State vs. Federal Regulation

25. © 2015 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted
to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
5-24
• Case 5.4 Mutual Pharmaceutical Co., Inc. v.
Bartlett (2013)
– Federal law regulates labels for prescription drugs
– State law provides product liability rights of recovery
for failure to warn
– Federal law does not allow generic producers to
change label by manufacturer, so they cannot include
additional disclosures
– State law was pre-empted by federal regulation – no
product liability
State vs. Federal Regulation

26. © 2015 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted
to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
5-25
• First Amendment
– Provides some protection for commercial
speech
• Commercial speech is speech used to further the
economic interests of the speaker
– Advertising and commercial speech protection
• Can regulate advertising
• Substantial government interest must be furthered
• Is the regulation the least restrictive means of
accomplishing the interest
Bill of Rights

27. © 2015 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted
to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
5-26
First
Amendment
Full Protection
First Amendment Protections
and Business Speech
Business
Political
Speech
Governmental
Regulation of
Commercial
Speech
Business
Advertising
Bill of Rights
Speech
on Social
Issues and
Business:
Nike,
Professions

28. © 2015 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted
to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
5-27
Bill of Rights
• First Amendment
– Corporate political speech
• Corporate participation in campaigns is given full
First Amendment protection
• Nike case was never fully litigated to determine
whether advertising regulation could be applied to,
for example, letters to the editor or columns by
corporate executives about controversial issues that
affect the company, such as Nike’s labor practices
in other countries

29. © 2015 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted
to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
5-28
Bill of Rights
• Case 5.5 Citizens United v. Federal
Election Commission (2010)
‒ Case returns to holding in Belotti case that First
Amendment rights are not contingent on how
much money or power the speaker holds
‒ Some limits on campaign contributions are
appropriate
‒ Controls on time, place, and manner of speech
in the lead-up to elections have too chilling an
effect on speech and dissemination of
information

30. © 2015 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted
to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
5-29
Eminent Domain
• Eminent domain is the right of
government to take private property
for public purpose for just
compensation
• Public use examples: Highways,
schools, urban redevelopment, limits
on mining, historical preservation,
economic development

31. © 2015 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted
to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
5-30
• Requirements
– Taking or regulating
• Examples: Prohibitions on use, elimination
of use
• In Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan
CATV Corp. et al. (1982)
• In Nollan v. California Coastal Commission
(1987)
• In Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council
(1992)
Eminent Domain

32. © 2015 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted
to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
5-31
Eminent Domain
• Just Compensation
• Public Purpose
• New issue is question of taking
property for economic development or
revitalization or just new projects

33. © 2015 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted
to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
5-32
Eminent Domain
• Case 5.6 Kelo v. City of New London
(2005)
– Issue of taking for economic
development
– Who owned the land?
– Who would get the land under the city’s
plan?
– What question in eminent domain was a
problem for the court?

34. © 2015 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted
to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
5-33
• Requirement: Procedural Due Process
– Applies to criminal, civil, and
administrative proceedings
• Example: Summons and complaint
provide notice to defendants
– Right to notice of hearings
– Right to be heard
Procedural Due Process

35. © 2015 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted
to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
5-34
• Requirement: Substantive Due
Process
– State laws cannot substantively
eliminate rights without some benefit
• Law must be logically related to legitimate
governmental purpose
• Example: Sunday blue laws—stores are
closed by law—states must be able to show
economic, health, social benefits of such
closure
Substantive Due Process

36. © 2015 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted
to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
5-35
Equal Protection
• Elements of Protection for Regulation
– Regulation must apply to all businesses
• Example: Courts have struck laws that
allow small stores to stay open on Sunday
while large stores could not

37. © 2015 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted
to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
5-36
International Law and
Constitutions
• General Types of Constitutions Found
in the United States and England
• Code Law Countries Found in Mexico
and Many European Countries
• Islamic Law: Based on Religion,
Governs All Aspect of Personal and
Business Life Law