The document discusses building clinical questions using the PICO framework. It explains that clinical questions can be either background questions seeking general information, or foreground questions seeking specific answers to inform clinical decisions. Foreground questions are best answered using the PICO elements - Patients, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome. Several examples of clinical questions are provided and categorized by question type (diagnosis, prognosis, treatment etc.). Building focused clinical questions in PICO format helps guide appropriate literature searching to find the best evidence quickly.
Pseudo–science and the art of software methodsGlen Alleman
We hear all the time about the next big thing that will undo all the standard principle of business management, software development methods, and processes needed to produce reliable, robust products as planned. Here's some "test" questions to get answered before getting to excitied.
How to formulate a researchable question based on picos - PubricaPubrica
Unanswered questions in current clinical practice and interactions dictating alternate treatments will lead to the formulation of a clinical research question. It would help researchers by giving them step-by-step instructions about how to formulate a research question.
Continue Reading: https://bit.ly/3ldryTV
For our services: https://pubrica.com/sevices/research-services/
Why Pubrica:
When you order our services, We promise you the following – Plagiarism free | always on Time | 24*7 customer support | Written to international Standard | Unlimited Revisions support | Medical writing Expert | Publication Support | Biostatistical experts | High-quality Subject Matter Experts.
Contact us:
Web: https://pubrica.com/
Blog: https://pubrica.com/academy/
Email: sales@pubrica.com
WhatsApp : +91 9884350006
United Kingdom: +44-1618186353
Pseudo–science and the art of software methodsGlen Alleman
We hear all the time about the next big thing that will undo all the standard principle of business management, software development methods, and processes needed to produce reliable, robust products as planned. Here's some "test" questions to get answered before getting to excitied.
How to formulate a researchable question based on picos - PubricaPubrica
Unanswered questions in current clinical practice and interactions dictating alternate treatments will lead to the formulation of a clinical research question. It would help researchers by giving them step-by-step instructions about how to formulate a research question.
Continue Reading: https://bit.ly/3ldryTV
For our services: https://pubrica.com/sevices/research-services/
Why Pubrica:
When you order our services, We promise you the following – Plagiarism free | always on Time | 24*7 customer support | Written to international Standard | Unlimited Revisions support | Medical writing Expert | Publication Support | Biostatistical experts | High-quality Subject Matter Experts.
Contact us:
Web: https://pubrica.com/
Blog: https://pubrica.com/academy/
Email: sales@pubrica.com
WhatsApp : +91 9884350006
United Kingdom: +44-1618186353
Pico framework for framing systematic review research questions - PubricaPubrica
P Patient, problem, population
I ‑ Intervention, prognostic factor, exposure
C ‑ Comparison
O ‑ Outcome
Continue Reading: https://bit.ly/3igMAQ4
For our services: https://pubrica.com/services/research-services/systematic-review/
Why Pubrica:
When you order our services, We promise you the following – Plagiarism free | always on Time | 24*7 customer support | Written to international Standard | Unlimited Revisions support | Medical writing Expert | Publication Support | Biostatistical experts | High-quality Subject Matter Experts.
Contact us:
Web: https://pubrica.com/
Blog: https://pubrica.com/academy/
Email: sales@pubrica.com
WhatsApp : +91 9884350006
United Kingdom: +44- 74248 10299
An introduction to the rationale and the two types (Write-in and Select-Menu) of Key Feature Questions. This presentation is based on an original article by Page and Bordage (1995).
My presentation slides during the 1st National Symposium in Emergency and Acute Care (S.E.M.A.C). I presented some of the obstacles and challenges in scientific writing in emergency medicine within the Malaysia context as academic emergency medicine is still progressing in Malaysia,
How to Think Straight- Cognitive Debiasing Pat CroskerrySMACC Conference
"How to think straight: Cognitive de-biasing by Pat Croskerry
The number of preventable deaths of hospitalized patients in the US each year is estimated at 40,000- 80,000. The figure for the ICU alone is estimated at 40,000 so the death rate must be in the higher end of the range. When settings outside the hospital are taken into account (ED, primary care), the overall number must be considerably higher.
While many factors contribute to diagnostic failure, a variety of sources suggest that physician’s thinking has a lot to do with it. Dual Process Theory describes how the brain makes decisions in one of two modes: through fast, unconscious, intuitive processes (System 1) or through slower, conscious, analytical processes (System 2). Mental short-cuts (heuristics) and biases are predominantly located in the intuitive mode where we spend most of our conscious time, and this is where the majority of decision failures occur. Thinking straight essentially means achieving a good balance between System 1 and System 2 decision making, and much of our cognitive effort needs to go into monitoring what our unconscious brains are doing in System 1. This is referred to by a variety of terms: metacognition, reflection, mindfulness, and others. They all involve cognitive de-coupling from System 1 and characterize the process of cognitive de-biasing. This is not easily accomplished in the ED or any environment where decision density is often high, throughput pressure exists, resources may be limited, and where decision makers may be fatigued and/or sleep deprived.
While medicine has acquired a variety of strategies over the years for de-biasing clinicians, added benefits can be obtained by developing specific mindware to tackle particular biases. Clinicians need to be aware of the operating characteristics of the dual process model of decision making, of the prevalence and nature of biases, and of how to apply and sustain de-biasing mindware in their decision making.
"
Pico framework for framing systematic review research questions - PubricaPubrica
P Patient, problem, population
I ‑ Intervention, prognostic factor, exposure
C ‑ Comparison
O ‑ Outcome
Continue Reading: https://bit.ly/3igMAQ4
For our services: https://pubrica.com/services/research-services/systematic-review/
Why Pubrica:
When you order our services, We promise you the following – Plagiarism free | always on Time | 24*7 customer support | Written to international Standard | Unlimited Revisions support | Medical writing Expert | Publication Support | Biostatistical experts | High-quality Subject Matter Experts.
Contact us:
Web: https://pubrica.com/
Blog: https://pubrica.com/academy/
Email: sales@pubrica.com
WhatsApp : +91 9884350006
United Kingdom: +44- 74248 10299
An introduction to the rationale and the two types (Write-in and Select-Menu) of Key Feature Questions. This presentation is based on an original article by Page and Bordage (1995).
My presentation slides during the 1st National Symposium in Emergency and Acute Care (S.E.M.A.C). I presented some of the obstacles and challenges in scientific writing in emergency medicine within the Malaysia context as academic emergency medicine is still progressing in Malaysia,
How to Think Straight- Cognitive Debiasing Pat CroskerrySMACC Conference
"How to think straight: Cognitive de-biasing by Pat Croskerry
The number of preventable deaths of hospitalized patients in the US each year is estimated at 40,000- 80,000. The figure for the ICU alone is estimated at 40,000 so the death rate must be in the higher end of the range. When settings outside the hospital are taken into account (ED, primary care), the overall number must be considerably higher.
While many factors contribute to diagnostic failure, a variety of sources suggest that physician’s thinking has a lot to do with it. Dual Process Theory describes how the brain makes decisions in one of two modes: through fast, unconscious, intuitive processes (System 1) or through slower, conscious, analytical processes (System 2). Mental short-cuts (heuristics) and biases are predominantly located in the intuitive mode where we spend most of our conscious time, and this is where the majority of decision failures occur. Thinking straight essentially means achieving a good balance between System 1 and System 2 decision making, and much of our cognitive effort needs to go into monitoring what our unconscious brains are doing in System 1. This is referred to by a variety of terms: metacognition, reflection, mindfulness, and others. They all involve cognitive de-coupling from System 1 and characterize the process of cognitive de-biasing. This is not easily accomplished in the ED or any environment where decision density is often high, throughput pressure exists, resources may be limited, and where decision makers may be fatigued and/or sleep deprived.
While medicine has acquired a variety of strategies over the years for de-biasing clinicians, added benefits can be obtained by developing specific mindware to tackle particular biases. Clinicians need to be aware of the operating characteristics of the dual process model of decision making, of the prevalence and nature of biases, and of how to apply and sustain de-biasing mindware in their decision making.
"
Learning Objectives
1. Identify strategies for Clinical Reasoning Strategies.
2. Identify the RIME Framework for Clinical Competency.
3. Identify how to facilitate Bedside Teaching (according to Cox Model).
This is a presentation about the importance of Evidence Based Medicine and how it acts as a crucial tool in decision making to empower the quality of medical services for better patient outcomes.
It highlights the steps in EBM process, how to identify the parts of a well built clinical question, resources for literature search, critical appraisal of the evidence, and how to apply the evidence to the patient.
This presentation focuses on informed decision making in clinical practice making use of evidence based practice. It addresses the use of PICO to formulate clinical question, searching the evidence/literature, critically appraising the evidence, and application of the evidence to improve the quality of clinical practice
رای جستجوي اطلاعات مناسب، یافتن بهترین شواهد موجود در کمترین زمان ممکن بسیار مهم و حیاتی می باشد. از این رو آشنایی با روشهای صحیح جستجو، نحوه طرح سوال قابل پاسخ (PICO ) و پایگاههای اطلاعاتی مناسب ضروری به نظر می رسد
استراتژی عمومی جستجو در بالین
مرحله اول: طراحی PICO
در مرحله اول جستجوی اطلاعات، چند دقیقه وقت بگذارید و به خوبی در مورد سوال خود و آنچه که می خواهید در مورد آن جستجو کنید فکر کنید. جستجوگر بایستی مشکل و سوال خود را بخوبی بررسی و تجزیه و تحلیل کند. يكي از بهترين توصيه ها در این زمینه براي كادر بالینی، طرح سوال قابل پاسخ و یا به اصطلاح PICO است
مرحله دوم: تعیین کلیدواژه ها و مترادفات
پس از طراحی PICO ، کلیدواژه های جستجو بر اساس P ، I ، C و O در سوال موردنظر تعیین می شوند. واژه های مترادف و مرتبط این کلیدواژه ها از قبیل اختصارات، واژه های با دامنه وسیع تر و یا دامنه محدودتر، رسم الخط های متفاوت و ... نیز در صورت نیاز تعیین می شوند و جستجو آغاز می شود
مرحله سوم: انتخاب پایگاه اطلاعاتی مناسب
انتخاب پایگاه اطلاعاتی مناسب و مرتبط با موضوع جستجو یکی از کلیدی ترین مراحل جستجو است. با توجه به اینکه بسیاری از پایگاههای اطلاعاتی بویژه در حوزه پزشکی براساس نوع اطلاعات و مطالعات در حال تخصصی شدن هستند، آشنایی با دامنه موضوعی و کاربردهای آنها موجب بازیابی اطلاعات مناسب تر و صرفه جویی در زمان خواهد شد.
مرحله چهارم: طراحی روش جستجو
جستجو در اینترنت و پایگاه اطلاعاتی با بکارگیری روشهای ساده و در عین حال صحیح جستجو بسیار آسان و لذت بخش خواهد بود. برعکس، عدم آشنایی با این روشهای آسان ممکن است موجب شود که یا اطلاعات غیرمرتبط بازیابی کنید و یا بسیاری از اطلاعات مفید را از دست بدهید.
3. 3
EBM is like …
• We need a President…
• Ask: Taiwan (P) / 馬 (I) / 謝 (C) / … (O)
• Acquire: Searching
• Appraise: Collect/Compare information
• Apply: Making decision.
• Audit: Enjoy our new P, U vote him again?
7. 7
Which one is answerable by a
single research?
• What is the meaning of life?
• What is the risk of autism following a
measles vaccine?
• What is the best treatment for
osteoarthritis?
• Why don’t patients take their prescribed
medications?
EBP workbook 2007, 2/e.
9. 9
Ask – Step 1 – Back/Foreground
• Background - 5W & 1H
– who, when, where, what, why & how
– Question about a disorder, test, treatment …
• Foreground - PICO
– Specific knowledge to inform clinical
decision or action
– A & B diagnostic test or treatment for a
disorder
17. 17
Examples 2
• 53 year-old man with chronic tophaceous gout.
He is allergic to allopurinol and his creatinine is 2
mg/dL. He suffered from frequent attack of
arthritis (once every one to two week).
– What is the etiology of gout?
– What is the risk factor for gout attack?
– Will he require dialysis in the long run?
– Is vitamin C supplement decrease serum UA or gout
attack?
19. 19
Type Background Foreground
Intervention What to do?
How to treat?
I vs C
Etiology What is the cause? I vs C
Diagnosis Does the patient
have …?
I vs C
Prognosis Who will have …?
Frequency
& Rate
How common …?
26. 26
Ask …
• Selecting, Scheduling, Saving
– Immediate
– In PICO format (papers, desktop/PDA
computers, cards)
27. 27
Important, Relevant, Time,
Interesting, Recur
• Examples 2
– 53 year-old man with chronic tophaceous gout. He is
allergic to allopurinol and his creatinine is 2 mg/dL. He
suffered from frequent attack of arthritis (once every
one to two week).
• Recognize potential questions!
• Decide which one is the most important Q!
30. 30
Which one do you think is/are
answerable by a single research?
• What is the meaning of life?
• What is the risk of autism following a
measles vaccine?
• What is the best treatment for
osteoarthritis?
• Why don’t patients take their prescribed
medications?
EBP workbook 2007, 2/e.