Worked examples from the ClearCalcs AS4100 Steel Design Webinar - slides: https://www.slideshare.net/clearcalcs/steel-design-to-as4100-1998-a12016-webinar-clearcalcs
Worked Examples for Timber Beam Design to AS1720.1 WebinarClearCalcs
Supporting worked examples for the ClearCalcs timber beam design webinar. Included examples cover a simply supported and complex wood beam designed using the ClearCalcs AS1720.1 calculator.
Steel Design to AS4100 1998 (+A1,2016) Webinar - ClearCalcsClearCalcs
Understanding the complete steel design process and
previewing possible upcoming changes.
Covers scope and analysis of steel beam design, flexural capacity, shear capacity, bearing capacity, load interactions, and deflection.
A video recording of the webinar is available on YouTube:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x2Oun8_zHY0
Designing a Cold-Formed Steel Beam Using AS4600:2018 and 2005 - WebinarClearCalcs
Recording: https://vimeo.com/318370452
Cold-formed and light gauge steel are rapidly growing in use across residential and commercial projects thanks to their cost-effective and customisable nature.
In this presentation, ClearCalcs engineer Brooks Smith discusses what makes CFS unique, how to design a cold-formed beam to the newly released AS4600:2018, and key differences between the older 2005 version of the standard - most notably the new preference for the use of the Direct Strength Method over the Effective Width Method.
Comparision of Design Codes ACI 318-11, IS 456 2000 and Eurocode IIijtsrd
National building codes have been formulated in different countries to lay down guidelines for the design and construction of structures. The codes have been evolved from the collective wisdom of expert structural engineers, gained over the years. These codes are periodically revised to bring them in line with current research, and often current trends. The main function of the design codes is to ensure adequate structural safety, by specifying certain essential minimum reinforcement for design. They render the task of the designer relatively easy and simple, results are often formulated in formulas or charts. The codes ensure a certain degree of consistency among different designers. Finally, they have some legal validity in that they protect the structural designer from any liability due to structural failures that are caused by inadequate supervision and or faulty material and construction. The aim of this project is to compare the design codes of IS 456-2007, ACI 318-11code and Eurocode II. The broad design criteria like stress strain block parameters, L D ratio, load combinations, formula will be compared along with the area of steel for the major structural members like beams, slab, columns, footing to get an over view how the codes fair in comparison with each other. The emphasis will be to put the results in tabular and graphical representation so as to get a better clarity and comparative analysis. Iqbal Rasool Dar "Comparision of Design Codes ACI 318-11, IS 456:2000 and Eurocode II" Published in International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development (ijtsrd), ISSN: 2456-6470, Volume-3 | Issue-1 , December 2018, URL: http://www.ijtsrd.com/papers/ijtsrd18949.pdf
http://www.ijtsrd.com/engineering/civil-engineering/18949/comparision-of-design-codes-aci-318-11-is-4562000-and-eurocode-ii/iqbal-rasool-dar
This document presents an example of analysis design of slab using ETABS. This example examines a simple single story building, which is regular in plan and elevation. It is examining and compares the calculated ultimate moment from CSI ETABS & SAFE with hand calculation. Moment coefficients were used to calculate the ultimate moment. However it is good practice that such hand analysis methods are used to verify the output of more sophisticated methods.
Also, this document contains simple procedure (step-by-step) of how to design solid slab according to Eurocode 2.The process of designing elements will not be revolutionised as a result of using Eurocode 2. Due to time constraints and knowledge, I may not be able to address the whole issues.
Worked Examples for Timber Beam Design to AS1720.1 WebinarClearCalcs
Supporting worked examples for the ClearCalcs timber beam design webinar. Included examples cover a simply supported and complex wood beam designed using the ClearCalcs AS1720.1 calculator.
Steel Design to AS4100 1998 (+A1,2016) Webinar - ClearCalcsClearCalcs
Understanding the complete steel design process and
previewing possible upcoming changes.
Covers scope and analysis of steel beam design, flexural capacity, shear capacity, bearing capacity, load interactions, and deflection.
A video recording of the webinar is available on YouTube:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x2Oun8_zHY0
Designing a Cold-Formed Steel Beam Using AS4600:2018 and 2005 - WebinarClearCalcs
Recording: https://vimeo.com/318370452
Cold-formed and light gauge steel are rapidly growing in use across residential and commercial projects thanks to their cost-effective and customisable nature.
In this presentation, ClearCalcs engineer Brooks Smith discusses what makes CFS unique, how to design a cold-formed beam to the newly released AS4600:2018, and key differences between the older 2005 version of the standard - most notably the new preference for the use of the Direct Strength Method over the Effective Width Method.
Comparision of Design Codes ACI 318-11, IS 456 2000 and Eurocode IIijtsrd
National building codes have been formulated in different countries to lay down guidelines for the design and construction of structures. The codes have been evolved from the collective wisdom of expert structural engineers, gained over the years. These codes are periodically revised to bring them in line with current research, and often current trends. The main function of the design codes is to ensure adequate structural safety, by specifying certain essential minimum reinforcement for design. They render the task of the designer relatively easy and simple, results are often formulated in formulas or charts. The codes ensure a certain degree of consistency among different designers. Finally, they have some legal validity in that they protect the structural designer from any liability due to structural failures that are caused by inadequate supervision and or faulty material and construction. The aim of this project is to compare the design codes of IS 456-2007, ACI 318-11code and Eurocode II. The broad design criteria like stress strain block parameters, L D ratio, load combinations, formula will be compared along with the area of steel for the major structural members like beams, slab, columns, footing to get an over view how the codes fair in comparison with each other. The emphasis will be to put the results in tabular and graphical representation so as to get a better clarity and comparative analysis. Iqbal Rasool Dar "Comparision of Design Codes ACI 318-11, IS 456:2000 and Eurocode II" Published in International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development (ijtsrd), ISSN: 2456-6470, Volume-3 | Issue-1 , December 2018, URL: http://www.ijtsrd.com/papers/ijtsrd18949.pdf
http://www.ijtsrd.com/engineering/civil-engineering/18949/comparision-of-design-codes-aci-318-11-is-4562000-and-eurocode-ii/iqbal-rasool-dar
This document presents an example of analysis design of slab using ETABS. This example examines a simple single story building, which is regular in plan and elevation. It is examining and compares the calculated ultimate moment from CSI ETABS & SAFE with hand calculation. Moment coefficients were used to calculate the ultimate moment. However it is good practice that such hand analysis methods are used to verify the output of more sophisticated methods.
Also, this document contains simple procedure (step-by-step) of how to design solid slab according to Eurocode 2.The process of designing elements will not be revolutionised as a result of using Eurocode 2. Due to time constraints and knowledge, I may not be able to address the whole issues.
American Society of Civil Engineers
Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures
2010
--------------------------
Te invito a que visites mis sitios en internet:
_*Canal en youtube de ingenieria civil_*
https://www.youtube.com/@IngenieriaEstructural7
_*Blog de ingenieria civil*_
https://thejamez-one.blogspot.com
Wind Design to AS/NZ 1170.2 Webinar Slides - ClearCalcsClearCalcs
Technical webinar discussing wind design to Australian and New Zealand Wind Standard 1170.2-2011 including a discussion of key design parameters, modification factors, notable clauses, and worked examples for a simple omni-directional design and a complex multi-directional terrain design.
Try out the AS1170.2 Wind Calculator now available at ClearCalcs.com
Webinar recording available at:
https://vimeo.com/350649576
Designing a Concrete Beam Using the New AS3600:2018 - Webinar Slides - ClearC...ClearCalcs
The 2018 revision of the AS3600 Concrete standard includes major revisions for areas including phi factors, shear, deflection, rectangular stress block, and shrinkage/creep.
In this webinar, ClearCalcs lead engineering developer Brooks Smith discusses some of these key changes, and runs through the design process for a concrete beam design before demonstrating a few worked examples using AS3600:2018 in the newly released rectangular concrete beam calculator on ClearCalcs.com.
Watch the recorded webinar: https://vimeo.com/295532300
Explore all of our concrete, timber, and steel calculations at clearcalcs.com.
Designing a Cold-Formed Steel Beam Using AISI S100-16ClearCalcs
ClearCalcs engineer Brooks Smith outlines what makes Cold Formed and Light Gauge steel unique, the design process using the Direct Strength Method, and runs through design examples and considerations including: flexural capacity, shear capacity, bearing capacity, load interactions, and deflection.
This webinar is perfect for structural and civil engineers interested in learning more about cold formed steel for and its applications in structural design and analysis.
Try out our cold formed steel calculators at www.clearcalcs.com
Timber Design to AS1720.1 (+Amdt 3, 2010) Webinar - ClearCalcsClearCalcs
Understanding the complete timber design process and the
key differences with wood design using AS 1720.1 or AS 1684.
ClearCalcs engineering development lead Brooks Smith gave this free engineering webinar covering Timber Design to AS1720.1, including a discussion of common design parameters and considerations, a comparison with the residentially geared AS1720.3 and AS1684, as well as worked examples using the AS 1720.1 calculator in ClearCalcs.
Long a mainstay in residential construction due to its versatility, cost, and environmental friendliness, timber is now seeing growing demand in mid rise structures thanks to growing understanding of how to utilise the material, as well as the continued rise in availability of engineered wood products (EWP) such as glue laminated and cross laminated timbers.
However, unlike steel whose properties tend to remain fairly constant over time, timber has a range of factors that need to be considered by engineers including moisture content, creep, and load duration factors.
Prestress loss due to friction & anchorage take upAyaz Malik
This document provides a detailed procedure for calculating prestress loss due to anchorage take-up. Prestress Loss due to friction is also discussed in detail.
A presentation about the scope of footfall analysis is shown under SCI P354. In tandem with the theory, a case study example of a very thin slab (i.e. Comflor 60 130mm) is also examined on Robot Structural Analysis 2015 under four (4) different structural arrangements. Through the FE approach, the Resonant Response Factors are presented for each case, providing a good reflection of the solution and the mitigation measured that should be sought for slab vibrations under walking load.
In India, industries usually have quality range of gantry girders for industrial sheds. Assisted by skilled workers in India, companies have been able to successfully grow towards the zenith, but there is still minor margin remaining which can be achieved by optimally designing the gantry girder in an economic as well as efficient manner. For this purpose, it is essential to implement the procedure for model, design, analyze and validate the girder efficiently.
American Society of Civil Engineers
Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures
2010
--------------------------
Te invito a que visites mis sitios en internet:
_*Canal en youtube de ingenieria civil_*
https://www.youtube.com/@IngenieriaEstructural7
_*Blog de ingenieria civil*_
https://thejamez-one.blogspot.com
Wind Design to AS/NZ 1170.2 Webinar Slides - ClearCalcsClearCalcs
Technical webinar discussing wind design to Australian and New Zealand Wind Standard 1170.2-2011 including a discussion of key design parameters, modification factors, notable clauses, and worked examples for a simple omni-directional design and a complex multi-directional terrain design.
Try out the AS1170.2 Wind Calculator now available at ClearCalcs.com
Webinar recording available at:
https://vimeo.com/350649576
Designing a Concrete Beam Using the New AS3600:2018 - Webinar Slides - ClearC...ClearCalcs
The 2018 revision of the AS3600 Concrete standard includes major revisions for areas including phi factors, shear, deflection, rectangular stress block, and shrinkage/creep.
In this webinar, ClearCalcs lead engineering developer Brooks Smith discusses some of these key changes, and runs through the design process for a concrete beam design before demonstrating a few worked examples using AS3600:2018 in the newly released rectangular concrete beam calculator on ClearCalcs.com.
Watch the recorded webinar: https://vimeo.com/295532300
Explore all of our concrete, timber, and steel calculations at clearcalcs.com.
Designing a Cold-Formed Steel Beam Using AISI S100-16ClearCalcs
ClearCalcs engineer Brooks Smith outlines what makes Cold Formed and Light Gauge steel unique, the design process using the Direct Strength Method, and runs through design examples and considerations including: flexural capacity, shear capacity, bearing capacity, load interactions, and deflection.
This webinar is perfect for structural and civil engineers interested in learning more about cold formed steel for and its applications in structural design and analysis.
Try out our cold formed steel calculators at www.clearcalcs.com
Timber Design to AS1720.1 (+Amdt 3, 2010) Webinar - ClearCalcsClearCalcs
Understanding the complete timber design process and the
key differences with wood design using AS 1720.1 or AS 1684.
ClearCalcs engineering development lead Brooks Smith gave this free engineering webinar covering Timber Design to AS1720.1, including a discussion of common design parameters and considerations, a comparison with the residentially geared AS1720.3 and AS1684, as well as worked examples using the AS 1720.1 calculator in ClearCalcs.
Long a mainstay in residential construction due to its versatility, cost, and environmental friendliness, timber is now seeing growing demand in mid rise structures thanks to growing understanding of how to utilise the material, as well as the continued rise in availability of engineered wood products (EWP) such as glue laminated and cross laminated timbers.
However, unlike steel whose properties tend to remain fairly constant over time, timber has a range of factors that need to be considered by engineers including moisture content, creep, and load duration factors.
Prestress loss due to friction & anchorage take upAyaz Malik
This document provides a detailed procedure for calculating prestress loss due to anchorage take-up. Prestress Loss due to friction is also discussed in detail.
A presentation about the scope of footfall analysis is shown under SCI P354. In tandem with the theory, a case study example of a very thin slab (i.e. Comflor 60 130mm) is also examined on Robot Structural Analysis 2015 under four (4) different structural arrangements. Through the FE approach, the Resonant Response Factors are presented for each case, providing a good reflection of the solution and the mitigation measured that should be sought for slab vibrations under walking load.
In India, industries usually have quality range of gantry girders for industrial sheds. Assisted by skilled workers in India, companies have been able to successfully grow towards the zenith, but there is still minor margin remaining which can be achieved by optimally designing the gantry girder in an economic as well as efficient manner. For this purpose, it is essential to implement the procedure for model, design, analyze and validate the girder efficiently.
Gantry girder
Gantry girder or crane girder hand operated or electrically operated overhead cranes in industrial building such as factories, workshops, steel works, etc. to lift heavy materials, equipment etc. and carry them from one location to other , within the building
The GANTRY GIRDER spans between brackets attached to columns, which may either be of steel or reinforced concrete. Thus the span of gantry girder is equal to centre to centre spacing of columns. The rails are mounted on gantry girders.
Loads acting on gantry girder
Gantry girder, having no lateral support in its length (laterally unsupported) has to withstand the following loads:
1. Vertical loads from crane :
Self weight of crane girder
Hook load
Weight of crab (trolley)
2. Impact load from crane :
As the load is lifted using the crane hook and moved from one place to another, and released at the required place, an impact is felt on the gantry girder.
3. Longitudinal horizontal force (Drag force) :
This is caused due to the starting and stopping of the crane girder moving over the crane rails, as the crane girder moves longitudinally, i.e. in the direction of gantry girder.
This force is also known as braking force, or drag force.
This force is taken equal to 5% of the static wheel loads for EOT or hand operated cranes.
4. Lateral load (Surge load) :
Lateral forces are caused due to sudden starting or stopping of the crab when moving over the crane girder.
Lateral forces are also caused when the crane is dragging weights across the' floor of the shop.
Types of gantry girders
Depending upon the span and crane capacity, there can be many forms of gantry girders. Some commonly used forms are shows in fig .
Rolled steel beams with or without plates, channels or angles are normally used for spans up to 8m and for cranes up to 50kN capacity.
Plate girder are suitable up to span 6 to 10 m.
Plate girder with channels, angles, etc. can be used for spans more than 10m
Box girder are used foe spans more than 12m.
6th International Conference on Machine Learning & Applications (CMLA 2024)ClaraZara1
6th International Conference on Machine Learning & Applications (CMLA 2024) will provide an excellent international forum for sharing knowledge and results in theory, methodology and applications of on Machine Learning & Applications.
NO1 Uk best vashikaran specialist in delhi vashikaran baba near me online vas...Amil Baba Dawood bangali
Contact with Dawood Bhai Just call on +92322-6382012 and we'll help you. We'll solve all your problems within 12 to 24 hours and with 101% guarantee and with astrology systematic. If you want to take any personal or professional advice then also you can call us on +92322-6382012 , ONLINE LOVE PROBLEM & Other all types of Daily Life Problem's.Then CALL or WHATSAPP us on +92322-6382012 and Get all these problems solutions here by Amil Baba DAWOOD BANGALI
#vashikaranspecialist #astrologer #palmistry #amliyaat #taweez #manpasandshadi #horoscope #spiritual #lovelife #lovespell #marriagespell#aamilbabainpakistan #amilbabainkarachi #powerfullblackmagicspell #kalajadumantarspecialist #realamilbaba #AmilbabainPakistan #astrologerincanada #astrologerindubai #lovespellsmaster #kalajaduspecialist #lovespellsthatwork #aamilbabainlahore#blackmagicformarriage #aamilbaba #kalajadu #kalailam #taweez #wazifaexpert #jadumantar #vashikaranspecialist #astrologer #palmistry #amliyaat #taweez #manpasandshadi #horoscope #spiritual #lovelife #lovespell #marriagespell#aamilbabainpakistan #amilbabainkarachi #powerfullblackmagicspell #kalajadumantarspecialist #realamilbaba #AmilbabainPakistan #astrologerincanada #astrologerindubai #lovespellsmaster #kalajaduspecialist #lovespellsthatwork #aamilbabainlahore #blackmagicforlove #blackmagicformarriage #aamilbaba #kalajadu #kalailam #taweez #wazifaexpert #jadumantar #vashikaranspecialist #astrologer #palmistry #amliyaat #taweez #manpasandshadi #horoscope #spiritual #lovelife #lovespell #marriagespell#aamilbabainpakistan #amilbabainkarachi #powerfullblackmagicspell #kalajadumantarspecialist #realamilbaba #AmilbabainPakistan #astrologerincanada #astrologerindubai #lovespellsmaster #kalajaduspecialist #lovespellsthatwork #aamilbabainlahore #Amilbabainuk #amilbabainspain #amilbabaindubai #Amilbabainnorway #amilbabainkrachi #amilbabainlahore #amilbabaingujranwalan #amilbabainislamabad
Industrial Training at Shahjalal Fertilizer Company Limited (SFCL)MdTanvirMahtab2
This presentation is about the working procedure of Shahjalal Fertilizer Company Limited (SFCL). A Govt. owned Company of Bangladesh Chemical Industries Corporation under Ministry of Industries.
HEAP SORT ILLUSTRATED WITH HEAPIFY, BUILD HEAP FOR DYNAMIC ARRAYS.
Heap sort is a comparison-based sorting technique based on Binary Heap data structure. It is similar to the selection sort where we first find the minimum element and place the minimum element at the beginning. Repeat the same process for the remaining elements.
Hybrid optimization of pumped hydro system and solar- Engr. Abdul-Azeez.pdffxintegritypublishin
Advancements in technology unveil a myriad of electrical and electronic breakthroughs geared towards efficiently harnessing limited resources to meet human energy demands. The optimization of hybrid solar PV panels and pumped hydro energy supply systems plays a pivotal role in utilizing natural resources effectively. This initiative not only benefits humanity but also fosters environmental sustainability. The study investigated the design optimization of these hybrid systems, focusing on understanding solar radiation patterns, identifying geographical influences on solar radiation, formulating a mathematical model for system optimization, and determining the optimal configuration of PV panels and pumped hydro storage. Through a comparative analysis approach and eight weeks of data collection, the study addressed key research questions related to solar radiation patterns and optimal system design. The findings highlighted regions with heightened solar radiation levels, showcasing substantial potential for power generation and emphasizing the system's efficiency. Optimizing system design significantly boosted power generation, promoted renewable energy utilization, and enhanced energy storage capacity. The study underscored the benefits of optimizing hybrid solar PV panels and pumped hydro energy supply systems for sustainable energy usage. Optimizing the design of solar PV panels and pumped hydro energy supply systems as examined across diverse climatic conditions in a developing country, not only enhances power generation but also improves the integration of renewable energy sources and boosts energy storage capacities, particularly beneficial for less economically prosperous regions. Additionally, the study provides valuable insights for advancing energy research in economically viable areas. Recommendations included conducting site-specific assessments, utilizing advanced modeling tools, implementing regular maintenance protocols, and enhancing communication among system components.
1. Created with ClearCalcs.comSteel Beam (version 69) — Floor Bearer
Client: My Client Date: Sep 18, 2019
Author: Brooks Smith Job #: 1
Project: Webinar Subject: B1
References: AS4100-1998
Moment Demand
Moment Capacity
Governing Load Case for Moment 1.2G, 1.5Q
Shear Demand
Shear Capacity
Governing Load Case for Shear 1.2G, 1.5Q
Shear and Moment Interaction
Bearing Demand
Bearing Capacity
Governing Load Case for Bearing 1.2G, 1.5Q
Bending and Bearing Interaction
Max Short-Term Deflection
Governing Load Case for Short-Term
Deflection
G, Q_st
Max Long-Term Deflection
Governing Load Case for Long-Term
Deflection
G, Q_lt
Max Imposed Load Deflection
Graphed Load Case
M =gov
∗ 18.6 kNm
33% ϕM =gov 56.2 kNm
M =LC
∗
V =∗ 14.9 kN
9% ϕV =v 165 kN
V =LC
∗
9% int =MV 0.0904
R =gov
∗ 14.9 kN
9% ϕR =gov 170 kN
R =LC
∗
0% int =MR 0
88% δ =s −8.82 mm
δ =s,LC
64% δ =l −6.43 mm
δ =l,LC
80% δ =Q −7.98 mm
(Q) Unfactored Load
Load Case: Q
Envelope
1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0
Shear(kN)
-15
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
Load Case: Q
Envelope
1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0
Moment(kNm)
0
5
10
15
Summary
1
2. Member Type
Beam Orientation / Loading Direction
Total Beam Length
Deflection Limit Span Criterion
Span Type (Interior or Cantilever) Short-Term Service ( ) Long-Term Service ( ) Imposed Load Q ( )
300 300 300
Deflection Limit Absolute Criterion
Maximum Spacing of Lateral Restraints
Position of Supports from Left
Support Type Position ( ) Length of Bearing ( ) Restraint Type
Pinned 0 150 P: Partial (Lateral at Non-critical Flange + Partial Torsional)
Pinned 5000 150 P: Partial (Lateral at Non-critical Flange + Partial Torsional)
Maximum Interior Span
Maximum Cantilever
Distributed Loads
Label Load Width ( ) Permanent Load ( ) Imposed Load ( ) Start Location ( ) End Location ( )
Floor Load 2000 0.5 1.5 0 5000
Height of Loads Application
Include Self Weight
Self Weight
Character of Imposed Load
Wind Class
Ultimate Free Stream Dynamic Pressure
Serviceability Free Stream Dynamic
Pressure
Net Downward Pressure Coefficient
Net Uplift Pressure Coefficient
Short-Term LC: Q
Envelope
1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0
Deflection(mm)
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
Distance from Left of Beam (m)
0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0
Floor Load
3
0 5 m
3 kN/m
7.5 kN 7.5 kN
180 UB 22.2 - Gr.300PLUS
Major Axis / Loaded from Top
L = 5000 mm
D =lim
L/ L/ L/
Interior Spans
Δ =max 10 mm
L =L 600 mm
r =
mm mm
L =maxspan 5000 mm
L =maxcant 0 mm
w =
mm kPa kPa mm mm
Top Flange
Yes
SW = 0.218 kN/m
Floors: Offices
N1
q =u 0.69 kPa
q =s 0.41 kPa
C =pt,down↓ 0
C =pt,up↑ 0
Key Properties
Permanent & Imposed Loads (AS1170.1)
Wind and Other Loads (AS1170.x)
2
3. Wind Tributary/Load Width
Other Distributed Loads
Label Load Type Start Magnitude ( ) End Magnitude ( ) Start Location ( ) End Location ( )
Downward Wind Wu,dn 0 0 0 5000
Uplift Wind Wu,up 0 0 0 5000
Service Wind Ws 0 0 0 5000
Overall Breadth
Maximum Beam Depth
Overall Depth
Number of Webs
Depth Between Flanges
Thickness of Web
Web Slenderness Factor
Web Yield Stress
Breadth of Flange
Thickness of Flange
Flange Slenderness Factor
Flange Yield Stress
Ultimate Stress
Gross Second Moment of Area
Gross Second Moment of Area
Gross Elastic Section Modulus
Gross Plastic Section Modulus
Effective Section Modulus (per
manufacturer)
Modulus of Elasticity
Gross Axial Stiffness
Gross Member Stiffness
Shear Modulus of Elasticity
Character of Imposed Load Factors
Imposed Load Type Short-Term Factor Long-Term Factor Combination Factor Earthquake Factor
0.7 0.4 0.4 0.3
1 0.6 0.4 0.3
LW =wind 450 mm
w =other
kN/m kN/m mm mm
b = 90 mm
d =max 500 mm
d = 179 mm
n =w 1
d =l 159 mm
t =w 6 mm
d /t =l w 26.5
f =y,w 320 MPa
b =f 90 mm
t =f 10 mm
b /t =f1 f 4.2
f =y,f 320 MPa
f =u 440 MPa
I = 15300000 mm3
I =perp 1220000 mm3
Z = 171000 mm3
S = 195000 mm3
Z =e 195000 mm3
E = 200000 MPa
EA = 564000 kN ∗ mm/mm
EI = 3060 kNm2
G =S 80000 MPa
CharQ =
Distributed
Concentrated
Member Properties
Load Case Analysis (AS1170.0)
3
4. Strength Load Cases
Load Case Total Load ( ) Shear ( ) Moment ( ) Max Reaction ( )
1.35G 8.22 -4.11 5.14 4.11
1.2G, 1.5Q 29.8 14.9 18.6 14.9
1.2G, 1.5Q_lt 16.3 8.15 10.2 8.15
1.2G, Wu_down, Q_comb 13.3 -6.65 8.32 6.65
0.9G, Wu_up 5.48 -2.74 3.42 2.74
G, Eu, Q_E 10.6 -5.29 6.62 5.29
1.2G, Su, Q_comb 13.3 -6.65 8.32 6.65
Short-term Service Load Cases
Load Case Total Load ( ) Deflection ( )
G, Ws 6.09 -3.24
G, Q_st 16.6 -8.82
G, Ws, Q_lt 12.1 -6.43
G, Es, Q_lt 12.1 -6.43
G, Ss, Q_lt 12.1 -6.43
Long-term Service Load Cases
Load Case Total Load ( ) Deflection ( )
G 6.09 -3.24
G, Q_lt 12.1 -6.43
G, Ss, Q_lt 12.1 -6.43
Unfactored Load
Load Type Total Load ( ) Shear ( ) Moment ( ) Max Reaction ( ) Short-Term Deflection ( )
G 6.09 -3.04 3.81 3.04 -3.24
Q_dist 15 7.5 9.37 7.5 -7.98
Shear Capacity Factor
Nominal Shear Yield Capacity
Shear Buckling Coefficient
Nominal Shear Buckling Capacity
Nominal Shear Capacity in Uniform
Stress Distribution
Nominal Shear Capacity
Capacity Factor
Flange Element Slenderness
Flange Element Yield Slenderness Limit
Flange Element Plastic Slenderness Limit
Section Compactness in Bending Compact
Effective Section Modulus
Section Moment Capacity
Maximum Flange Area Reduction By
Holes
kN kN kNm kN
kN mm
kN mm
kN kN kNm kN mm
ϕ = 0.9
V =w 183 kN
α =v 7.48
V =b 183 kN
V =u 183 kN
V =v 183 kN
ϕ = 0.9
λ =e,f 4.75
λ =ey,f 14
λ =ep,f 8
compact =f
Z =e 195000 kNm
M =s 62.4 kNm
A =f,holes 14.4 %
Unfactored Load Analysis (AS1170.0)
Shear Capacity (AS4100-1998, Section 5.11)
Moment Section Capacity (AS4100-1998, Cl 5.3)
4
5. Moment Modification Factor Calculation
Span Length ( ) Span Type Maximum Moment ( ) Q1 Moment ( ) Q2 Moment ( ) Q3 Moment ( ) M Mod. Factor
5000 Int 18.6 13.9 18.6 13.9 1.17
Slenderness Reduction Factor
Span Length
( )
Span
Type
Twist Restraint
Factor
Lateral Rotation
Restraint Factor
Load Height
Factor
Effective
Length ( )
Reference Buckling
Moment ( )
Slenderness
Reduction Factor
5000 PP 1.15 1 1.4 969 252 0.901
Nominal Moment Utilisation
Span Length
( )
Span
Type
Moment Demand
( )
Member Moment Capacity
( )
Factored Moment Capacity
( )
Moment
Utilisation
5000 PP 18.6 65.7 56.2 0.332
Consider Proportioning Method? Yes
Flange Element Slenderness
Flange Element Yield Slenderness Limit
Compression Flange Effective Width
Compression Flange Effective Area
Flange Gross Area
Minimum Flange Net Area
Tension Flange Effective Area
Minimum Flange Effective Area
Distance Between Flange Centroids
Moment Capacity of Flanges Alone
Factored Moment Capacity of Flanges
Alone
Bending & Shear Capacity Per Support
Position
( )
Moment Demand
( )
Factored Section Moment
Capacity ( )
Shear Demand
( )
Shear Capacity Given Moment
Interaction ( )
Shear Capacity Given
Moment Utilisation
0 0 56.2 14.9 165 0.0904
5000 0 56.2 -14.9 165 0.0904
Capacity Factor
Interior Bearing Criteria
Flange Lateral Restraint
Member Section Constant for Web
Buckling
Form Factor for Web Buckling
Member Slenderness Reduction Factor
for Web
Position ( ) Geometric Slenderness Factor Factor Factor Factor Factor Slenderness Reduction
0 133 150 12.9 156 0.466 0.743 0.273
5 133 150 12.9 156 0.466 0.743 0.273
α =m
mm kNm kNm kNm kNm
α =s
mm mm kNm
M =table
mm kNm kNm kNm
PM =flag
λ =e 4.75
λ =ey 14
b ∣d =fe e 90 mm
A =fc 8100 mm2
A =fg 900 mm2
A =fn,min 770 mm2
A =ft 900 mm2
A =fm 900 mm2
d =f 169 mm
M =f 48.7 kNm
ϕM =f 43.8 kNm
r =
mm kNm kNm kN kN
ϕ = 0.9
B =d 105 mm
One Flange Only
α =b 0.5
k =f 1 mm
α =c,table
mm
Moment Capacity (AS4100-1998, Cl 5.1 & 5.6.1-2)
Shear - Bending Moment Interaction (AS4100, Cl 5.12)
Bearing Capacity (AS4100, Cl 5.13)
5
6. Bearing Capacity Per Support
Position
( )
Interior Location?
( )
Reaction
( )
Bearing Yield
Capacity ( )
Bearing Buckling
Capacity ( )
Factored Bearing
Capacity ( )
Bearing Utilisation
( )
0 1 14.9 480 188 170 0.0879
5000 1 14.9 480 188 170 0.0879
Bending & Bearing Capacity Per Support
Position
( )
Reaction
( )
Factored Bearing
Capacity ( )
Governing Moment Demand
( )
Factored Moment Capacity
( )
Bending & Bearing
Utilisation
0 14.9 170 0 56.2 0
5000 14.9 170 0 56.2 0
Short-Term Deflection Per Span
Span Length ( ) Span Type Short-Term Deflection ( ) Short-term Deflection Limit ( ) Deflection Utilisation
5000 Int -8.82 10 0.882
Long-Term Deflection Per Span
Span Length ( ) Span Type Long-Term Deflection ( ) Long-term Deflection Limit ( ) Deflection Utilisation
5000 Int -6.43 10 0.643
Imposed Load Deflection Per Span
Span Length ( ) Span Type Imposed Load Deflection ( ) Imposed Load Deflection Limit ( ) Deflection Utilisation
5000 Int -7.98 10 0.798
Comments
Steel Beam Analysis and Design to AS4100-1998 (R2016). Assumes: (1) Beam is of uniform cross-section along its full
length, (2) Detailing requirements are checked separately, (3) Net areas are equal to the gross area with maximum
allowed holes.
R =table
mm kN kN kN kN kN kN
r =
mm kN kN kNm kNm
D =ST
mm mm mm
D =LT
mm mm mm
D =Q
mm mm mm
Bending & Bearing Capacity (AS4100, Cl 5.13.5)
Deflection Analysis
Comments
Assumptions
6
7. Created with ClearCalcs.comSteel Beam (version 69) — Floor Bearer
Client: My Client Date: Sep 18, 2019
Author: Brooks Smith Job #: 1
Project: Webinar Subject: B2
References: AS4100-1998
Moment Demand
Moment Capacity
Governing Load Case for Moment 1.2G, 1.5Q
Shear Demand
Shear Capacity
Governing Load Case for Shear 1.2G, 1.5Q
Shear and Moment Interaction
Bearing Demand
Bearing Capacity
Governing Load Case for Bearing 1.2G, 1.5Q
Bending and Bearing Interaction
Max Short-Term Deflection
Governing Load Case for Short-Term
Deflection
G, Q_st
Max Long-Term Deflection
Governing Load Case for Long-Term
Deflection
G, Q_lt
Max Imposed Load Deflection
Graphed Load Case
M =gov
∗ −79.1 kNm
26% ϕM =gov 300 kNm
M =LC
∗
V =∗ −38 kN
8% ϕV =v 500 kN
V =LC
∗
8% int =MV 0.0759
R =gov
∗ 69.6 kN
61% ϕR =gov 115 kN
R =LC
∗
0% int =MR 0
91% δ =s −9.12 mm
δ =s,LC
69% δ =l −6.86 mm
δ =l,LC
75% δ =Q −7.54 mm
(Q) Unfactored Load
Load Case: Q
Envelope
5 10 15 20
Shear(kN)
-40
-20
0
20
Load Case: Q
Envelope
5 10 15 20
Moment(kNm)
-80
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
Summary
7
8. Member Type
Beam Orientation / Loading Direction
Total Beam Length
Deflection Limit Span Criterion
Span Type (Interior or Cantilever) Short-Term Service ( ) Long-Term Service ( ) Imposed Load Q ( )
300 300 300
150 150 150
Deflection Limit Absolute Criterion
Maximum Spacing of Lateral Restraints
Position of Supports from Left
Support Type Position ( ) Length of Bearing ( ) Restraint Type
Pinned 0 150 P: Partial (Lateral at Non-critical Flange + Partial Torsional)
Pinned 4000 150 L: Lateral at Critical Flange Only
Pinned 15000 150 P: Partial (Lateral at Non-critical Flange + Partial Torsional)
Maximum Interior Span
Maximum Cantilever
Distributed Loads
Label Load Width ( ) Permanent Load ( ) Imposed Load ( ) Start Location ( ) End Location ( )
Floor Load 2000 0.5 1.5 0 20000
Height of Loads Application
Include Self Weight
Self Weight
Character of Imposed Load
Wind Class
Ultimate Free Stream Dynamic Pressure
Serviceability Free Stream Dynamic
Pressure
Short-Term LC: Q
Envelope
5 10 15 20
Deflection(mm)
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
Distance from Left of Beam (m)
0 5 10 15 20
Floor Load
3
0 20 m
3 kN/m
0.719 kN 26.3 kN 33 kN
410 UB 53.7 - Gr.300PLUS
Major Axis / Loaded from Top
L = 20000 mm
D =lim
L/ L/ L/
Interior Spans
Cantilevers
Δ =max 10 mm
L =L 600 mm
r =
mm mm
L =maxspan 11000 mm
L =maxcant 5000 mm
w =
mm kPa kPa mm mm
Top Flange
Yes
SW = 0.527 kN/m
Floors: Offices
N1
q =u 0.69 kPa
q =s 0.41 kPa
Key Properties
Permanent & Imposed Loads (AS1170.1)
Wind and Other Loads (AS1170.x)
8
9. Net Downward Pressure Coefficient
Net Uplift Pressure Coefficient
Wind Tributary/Load Width
Other Distributed Loads
Label Load Type Start Magnitude ( ) End Magnitude ( ) Start Location ( ) End Location ( )
Downward Wind Wu,dn 0 0 0 20000
Uplift Wind Wu,up 0 0 0 20000
Service Wind Ws 0 0 0 20000
Overall Breadth
Maximum Beam Depth
Overall Depth
Number of Webs
Depth Between Flanges
Thickness of Web
Web Slenderness Factor
Web Yield Stress
Breadth of Flange
Thickness of Flange
Flange Slenderness Factor
Flange Yield Stress
Ultimate Stress
Gross Second Moment of Area
Gross Second Moment of Area
Gross Elastic Section Modulus
Gross Plastic Section Modulus
Effective Section Modulus (per
manufacturer)
Modulus of Elasticity
Gross Axial Stiffness
Gross Member Stiffness
Shear Modulus of Elasticity
Character of Imposed Load Factors
Imposed Load Type Short-Term Factor Long-Term Factor Combination Factor Earthquake Factor
0.7 0.4 0.4 0.3
1 0.6 0.4 0.3
C =pt,down↓ 0
C =pt,up↑ 0
LW =wind 450 mm
w =other
kN/m kN/m mm mm
b = 178 mm
d =max 500 mm
d = 403 mm
n =w 1
d =l 381 mm
t =w 7.6 mm
d /t =l w 50.1
f =y,w 320 MPa
b =f 178 mm
t =f 10.9 mm
b /t =f1 f 7.82
f =y,f 320 MPa
f =u 440 MPa
I = 188000000 mm3
I =perp 10300000 mm3
Z = 933000 mm3
S = 1060000 mm3
Z =e 1060000 mm3
E = 200000 MPa
EA = 1380000 kN ∗ mm/mm
EI = 37600 kNm2
G =S 80000 MPa
CharQ =
Distributed
Concentrated
Member Properties
Load Case Analysis (AS1170.0)
9
10. Strength Load Cases
Load Case Total Load ( ) Shear ( ) Moment ( ) Max Reaction ( )
1.35G 41.2 -12.4 -25.8 22.7
1.2G, 1.5Q 127 -38 -79.1 69.6
1.2G, 1.5Q_lt 72.6 -21.8 -45.4 39.9
1.2G, Wu_down, Q_comb 60.6 -18.2 -37.9 33.3
0.9G, Wu_up 27.5 -8.24 -17.2 15.1
G, Eu, Q_E 48.5 -14.6 -30.3 26.7
1.2G, Su, Q_comb 60.6 -18.2 -37.9 33.3
Short-term Service Load Cases
Load Case Total Load ( ) Deflection ( )
G, Ws 30.5 -3.84
G, Q_st 72.5 -9.12
G, Ws, Q_lt 54.5 -6.86
G, Es, Q_lt 54.5 -6.86
G, Ss, Q_lt 54.5 -6.86
Long-term Service Load Cases
Load Case Total Load ( ) Deflection ( )
G 30.5 -3.84
G, Q_lt 54.5 -6.86
G, Ss, Q_lt 54.5 -6.86
Unfactored Load
Load Type Total Load ( ) Shear ( ) Moment ( ) Max Reaction ( ) Short-Term Deflection ( )
G 30.5 -9.15 -19.1 16.8 -3.84
Q_dist 60 -18 -37.5 33 -7.54
Shear Capacity Factor
Nominal Shear Yield Capacity
Shear Buckling Coefficient
Nominal Shear Buckling Capacity
Nominal Shear Capacity in Uniform
Stress Distribution
Nominal Shear Capacity
Capacity Factor
Flange Element Slenderness
Flange Element Yield Slenderness Limit
Flange Element Plastic Slenderness Limit
Section Compactness in Bending Non-compact
Effective Section Modulus
Section Moment Capacity
Maximum Flange Area Reduction By
Holes
kN kN kNm kN
kN mm
kN mm
kN kN kNm kN mm
ϕ = 0.9
V =w 556 kN
α =v 2.09
V =b 556 kN
V =u 556 kN
V =v 556 kN
ϕ = 0.9
λ =e,f 8.85
λ =ey,f 14
λ =ep,f 8
compact =f
Z =e 1040000 kNm
M =s 333 kNm
A =f,holes 14.4 %
Unfactored Load Analysis (AS1170.0)
Shear Capacity (AS4100-1998, Section 5.11)
Moment Section Capacity (AS4100-1998, Cl 5.3)
10
11. Moment Modification Factor Calculation
Span Length ( ) Span Type Maximum Moment ( ) Q1 Moment ( ) Q2 Moment ( ) Q3 Moment ( ) M Mod. Factor
4000 Int -44.6 -1.63 -9.72 -24 2.5
11000 Int -79.1 17.8 34.1 2 2.5
5000 Cant -79.1 -45.6 -20.6 -5.23 1.25
Slenderness Reduction Factor
Span Length
( )
Span
Type
Twist Restraint
Factor
Lateral Rotation
Restraint Factor
Load Height
Factor
Effective
Length ( )
Reference Buckling
Moment ( )
Slenderness
Reduction Factor
4000 PL 1.47 1 1.4 1230 2660 0.967
11000 PL 1.47 1 1.4 1230 2660 0.967
5000 PP 1.23 1 1.4 1040 3750 0.987
Nominal Moment Utilisation
Span Length
( )
Span
Type
Moment Demand
( )
Member Moment Capacity
( )
Factored Moment Capacity
( )
Moment
Utilisation
4000 PL -44.6 806 300 0.149
11000 PL -79.1 806 300 0.264
5000 PP -79.1 411 300 0.264
Consider Proportioning Method? Yes
Flange Element Slenderness
Flange Element Yield Slenderness Limit
Compression Flange Effective Width
Compression Flange Effective Area
Flange Gross Area
Minimum Flange Net Area
Tension Flange Effective Area
Minimum Flange Effective Area
Distance Between Flange Centroids
Moment Capacity of Flanges Alone
Factored Moment Capacity of Flanges
Alone
Bending & Shear Capacity Per Support
Position
( )
Moment Demand
( )
Factored Section Moment
Capacity ( )
Shear Demand
( )
Shear Capacity Given Moment
Interaction ( )
Shear Capacity Given
Moment Utilisation
0 0 300 1.52 500 0.00303
4000 -44.6 300 31.7 500 0.0633
15000 -79.1 300 -38 500 0.0759
Capacity Factor
Interior Bearing Criteria
Flange Lateral Restraint
Member Section Constant for Web
Buckling
Form Factor for Web Buckling
α =m
mm kNm kNm kNm kNm
α =s
mm mm kNm
M =table
mm kNm kNm kNm
PM =flag
λ =e 8.85
λ =ey 14
b ∣d =fe e 178 mm
A =fc 31700 mm2
A =fg 1940 mm2
A =fn,min 1660 mm2
A =ft 1940 mm2
A =fm 1940 mm2
d =f 392 mm
M =f 243 kNm
ϕM =f 219 kNm
r =
mm kNm kNm kN kN
ϕ = 0.9
B =d 218 mm
One Flange Only
α =b 0.5
k =f 1 mm
Moment Capacity (AS4100-1998, Cl 5.1 & 5.6.1-2)
Shear - Bending Moment Interaction (AS4100, Cl 5.12)
Bearing Capacity (AS4100, Cl 5.13)
11
12. Member Slenderness Reduction Factor
for Web
Position ( ) Geometric Slenderness Factor Factor Factor Factor Factor Slenderness Reduction
0 251 284 7.26 287 0.892 0.593 0.0896
4 251 284 7.26 287 0.892 0.593 0.0896
15 251 284 7.26 287 0.892 0.593 0.0896
Bearing Capacity Per Support
Position
( )
Interior Location?
( )
Reaction
( )
Bearing Yield
Capacity ( )
Bearing Buckling
Capacity ( )
Factored Bearing
Capacity ( )
Bearing Utilisation
( )
0 1 1.52 622 128 115 0.0132
4000 1 55.5 622 128 115 0.483
15000 1 69.6 622 128 115 0.607
Bending & Bearing Capacity Per Support
Position
( )
Reaction
( )
Factored Bearing
Capacity ( )
Governing Moment Demand
( )
Factored Moment Capacity
( )
Bending & Bearing
Utilisation
0 1.52 115 0 300 0
4000 55.5 115 -44.6 300 0
15000 69.6 115 -79.1 300 0
Short-Term Deflection Per Span
Span Length ( ) Span Type Short-Term Deflection ( ) Short-term Deflection Limit ( ) Deflection Utilisation
4000 Int 0.358 10 0.0358
11000 Int -4.13 10 0.413
5000 Cant -9.12 10 0.912
Long-Term Deflection Per Span
Span Length ( ) Span Type Long-Term Deflection ( ) Long-term Deflection Limit ( ) Deflection Utilisation
4000 Int 0.269 10 0.0269
11000 Int -3.11 10 0.311
5000 Cant -6.86 10 0.686
Imposed Load Deflection Per Span
Span Length ( ) Span Type Imposed Load Deflection ( ) Imposed Load Deflection Limit ( ) Deflection Utilisation
4000 Int 0.296 10 0.0296
11000 Int -3.42 10 0.342
5000 Cant -7.54 10 0.754
Comments
Steel Beam Analysis and Design to AS4100-1998 (R2016). Assumes: (1) Beam is of uniform cross-section along its full
length, (2) Detailing requirements are checked separately, (3) Net areas are equal to the gross area with maximum
allowed holes.
α =c,table
mm
R =table
mm kN kN kN kN kN kN
r =
mm kN kN kNm kNm
D =ST
mm mm mm
D =LT
mm mm mm
D =Q
mm mm mm
Bending & Bearing Capacity (AS4100, Cl 5.13.5)
Deflection Analysis
Comments
Assumptions
12