Uploaded byAlana Lentin
Ar and poco critiques
The document discusses the decolonial epistemic shift and its implications for scientific practices through an anti-racist and postcolonial lens. It raises questions about the construction of scientific categories through language and the ethical considerations of conducting anti-racist research. Additionally, it references historical perspectives on race and cultural achievements, highlighting contributions from various scholars.
More Related Content
Similar to Ar and poco critiques
Ar and poco critiques
- 1.
- 2. Questions What is meantby the decolonial epistemic shift?
- 3. Questions What scientific practicesare challenged by anti-racist / anti-colonialist epistemology? What is meant by the decolonial epistemic shift?
- 4. Questions What scientific practicesare challenged by anti-racist / anti-colonialist epistemology? How is language used to construct scientific categories? What is meant by the decolonial epistemic shift?
- 5. Questions What scientific practicesare challenged by anti-racist / anti-colonialist epistemology? How is language used to construct scientific categories? What problems are raised by doing specifically anti-racist research? What is meant by the decolonial epistemic shift?
- 6. Questions What scientific practicesare challenged by anti-racist / anti-colonialist epistemology? How is language used to construct scientific categories? What problems are raised by doing specifically anti-racist research? What is an anti-racist / anti-colonialist standpoint for research or theory? What is meant by the decolonial epistemic shift?
- 7.
- 8.
- 9.
- 10.
- 11. “Current biological knowledgedoes not permit us to impute cultural achievements to differences in genetic potential. Differences in the achievements of different peoples should be attributed solely to their cultural history. The peoples of the world today appear to possess equal biological potentialities for attaining any level of civilization.”! UNESCO Statement on Race & Racial Prejudice 1950
- 12. Satpal Ram victim ofprison harassment
- 13. Subject of physicalanthropology (1840-55)
- 15. “groups of mankindpossessing well- developed and primarily heritable physical differences from other groups… national, religious, geographical, linguistic and cultural groups do not necessarily coincide with racial groups.” Juan Comas, 1961: 304.
- 20.
- 21. Lisu ethnic group,China
- 23.
- 25.
- 27.
- 32. Black Skin, WhiteMasks
- 36. Can the subalternspeak?
- 37.
- 38.
- 42.
- 43.
- 44.
- 45.