medicines on the lives of innocent animals
•Download as PPTX, PDF•
1 like•1,399 views
This document discusses animal testing and its harms. Approximately 17-32 million animals are used in testing each year, including mice, rats, dogs, cats, and primates. Animals undergo toxicology tests where they are poisoned, burned, or infected with diseases. However, animal tests only match human results 5-25% of the time, and their stress can impact results. There are growing alternatives that use human cells and tissues like Episkin that are more accurate and reliable than animal models. The document advocates that alternatives provide more humane and effective approaches than animal testing.
Report
Share
Report
Share
Recommended
Animal Testing
Animal testing should be banned according to the document, as it discusses that about 2.8 million animals including monkeys, rabbits, cats, rats, and dogs are tested on each year. It encourages readers to not use products that test on animals and provides a list of companies that do and do not test on animals, directing readers to a website for more information on companies' testing policies.
Animal Testing by Alice
The document discusses animal testing in laboratories and by cosmetics and food companies. It notes that many popular candy, cosmetics, and personal care brands test products on animals. However, animal tests only match human results 5-25% of the time, and less than 2% of human illnesses are seen in animals. The document states that over 2.7 million animals were tested in 2000 alone. It concludes by mentioning that PETA works to reduce animal suffering on factory farms, in clothing production, entertainment, and laboratories.
Animal Experimentation
Animal experimentation often involves capturing animals illegally and keeping them in small cages, subjecting them to cruelty. Common practices like the Draize test, where chemicals are put in rabbits' eyes to test for toxicity, are considered inhumane by many. Several cities have passed laws against animal testing due to concerns over capturing animals and subjecting them to confinement and experiments.
Animal Test
The document discusses animal testing and argues that it is cruel and should not be allowed. It notes that millions of animals suffer and die in testing each year and describes some of the types of tests conducted on animals, including poisoning and physical injury. Alternatives to animal testing are presented, and several organizations opposed to animal testing are mentioned.
Animal testing presentation
The document lists 27 species of animals, including monkeys, mice, dogs, and farm animals, that are used for animal testing. Animal testing is used for education, research, and testing products like shampoo as well as drugs, though products are sometimes sold without first being proven safe for animals. The practice of animal testing remains controversial, as some view it as inhumane while others see it as necessary for research and ensuring product and drug safety.
Which areas can animal experimentation be used in
This document discusses areas where animal experimentation is used. It notes that animal testing, or animal research, refers to using animals in experiments. The main areas discussed are medical/drug research, cosmetics testing, and chemical/household product testing. For medical research, animals like mice, rats and other rodents make up the majority tested and have contributed to advances like vaccines and cancer treatments. Cosmetics testing on animals is controversial as it causes suffering but is currently required in some places. Chemical testing also uses millions of animals worldwide to assess product safety. The document questions whether animal use is acceptable in some areas like cosmetics given alternative methods.
Animal testing pp
Animal testing, also known as animal experimentation, involves using non-human animals like mice, monkeys, and dogs in medical experiments. While opponents argue it causes animal suffering, proponents contend it has led to major medical advances like the polio vaccine and discovery of insulin. The document concludes that although animal testing raises ethical issues, banning it could hinder the development of treatments for serious diseases.
Animal testing presentation
This document discusses the debate around animal testing. While some argue animal testing is necessary to develop cures and ensure product safety, others believe it is cruel and unfair to animals. The document notes that over 27 species of animals are used in experiments, including monkeys, rats, mice, dogs and hamsters. Tests are conducted on medicines, cosmetics, tobacco and food. Supporters argue animal testing can save human lives by aiding medical advances, though some disagree due to concerns about animal welfare.
Recommended
Animal Testing
Animal testing should be banned according to the document, as it discusses that about 2.8 million animals including monkeys, rabbits, cats, rats, and dogs are tested on each year. It encourages readers to not use products that test on animals and provides a list of companies that do and do not test on animals, directing readers to a website for more information on companies' testing policies.
Animal Testing by Alice
The document discusses animal testing in laboratories and by cosmetics and food companies. It notes that many popular candy, cosmetics, and personal care brands test products on animals. However, animal tests only match human results 5-25% of the time, and less than 2% of human illnesses are seen in animals. The document states that over 2.7 million animals were tested in 2000 alone. It concludes by mentioning that PETA works to reduce animal suffering on factory farms, in clothing production, entertainment, and laboratories.
Animal Experimentation
Animal experimentation often involves capturing animals illegally and keeping them in small cages, subjecting them to cruelty. Common practices like the Draize test, where chemicals are put in rabbits' eyes to test for toxicity, are considered inhumane by many. Several cities have passed laws against animal testing due to concerns over capturing animals and subjecting them to confinement and experiments.
Animal Test
The document discusses animal testing and argues that it is cruel and should not be allowed. It notes that millions of animals suffer and die in testing each year and describes some of the types of tests conducted on animals, including poisoning and physical injury. Alternatives to animal testing are presented, and several organizations opposed to animal testing are mentioned.
Animal testing presentation
The document lists 27 species of animals, including monkeys, mice, dogs, and farm animals, that are used for animal testing. Animal testing is used for education, research, and testing products like shampoo as well as drugs, though products are sometimes sold without first being proven safe for animals. The practice of animal testing remains controversial, as some view it as inhumane while others see it as necessary for research and ensuring product and drug safety.
Which areas can animal experimentation be used in
This document discusses areas where animal experimentation is used. It notes that animal testing, or animal research, refers to using animals in experiments. The main areas discussed are medical/drug research, cosmetics testing, and chemical/household product testing. For medical research, animals like mice, rats and other rodents make up the majority tested and have contributed to advances like vaccines and cancer treatments. Cosmetics testing on animals is controversial as it causes suffering but is currently required in some places. Chemical testing also uses millions of animals worldwide to assess product safety. The document questions whether animal use is acceptable in some areas like cosmetics given alternative methods.
Animal testing pp
Animal testing, also known as animal experimentation, involves using non-human animals like mice, monkeys, and dogs in medical experiments. While opponents argue it causes animal suffering, proponents contend it has led to major medical advances like the polio vaccine and discovery of insulin. The document concludes that although animal testing raises ethical issues, banning it could hinder the development of treatments for serious diseases.
Animal testing presentation
This document discusses the debate around animal testing. While some argue animal testing is necessary to develop cures and ensure product safety, others believe it is cruel and unfair to animals. The document notes that over 27 species of animals are used in experiments, including monkeys, rats, mice, dogs and hamsters. Tests are conducted on medicines, cosmetics, tobacco and food. Supporters argue animal testing can save human lives by aiding medical advances, though some disagree due to concerns about animal welfare.
animal testing
The document discusses animal testing and argues that it is cruel and should not be allowed. It notes that millions of animals suffer and die in testing each year and describes some of the types of tests conducted on animals, including poisoning and physical injury. Alternatives to animal testing are presented, and several organizations opposed to animal testing are mentioned.
Animal Testing Powerpoint
There are three main types of animal testing: product testing to ensure safety after consumption, research performed for medical and scientific advancements like new drug experiments, and education and training from high school dissections to medical student training. Animal testing in Australia is legal but regulated by state and territory laws requiring approval from an authority. The National Health and Medical Research Council's Code of Practice for the Care and Use of Animals for Scientific Purposes provides the basis for practices and ensures testing is valid, humane, justifiable, and considerate. However, arguments against animal testing say it is cruel to animals as many tests result in pain, suffering, and death, and alternatives now exist.
Persuasive Powerpoint
Animal testing is commonly used to test the safety of products like cosmetics, household chemicals, and drugs. Animals are often subjected to painful experiments like toxicity tests that can cause bleeding and damage their eyes and skin. While supporters argue it is necessary for scientific research and drug development, critics point out that most medical breakthroughs have not relied on animal testing and that alternative testing methods now exist. Many countries in Europe have imposed restrictions or bans on animal testing and products tested on animals.
Animal Experimentation for Cosmetics
Animal Experimentation for Cosmetics - Resources for Healthy Children www.scribd.com/doc/254613619 - For more information, Please see Organic Edible Schoolyards & Gardening with Children www.scribd.com/doc/254613963 - Gardening with Volcanic Rock Dust www.scribd.com/doc/254613846 - Double Food Production from your School Garden with Organic Tech www.scribd.com/doc/254613765 - Free School Gardening Art Posters www.scribd.com/doc/254613694 - Increase Food Production with Companion Planting in your School Garden www.scribd.com/doc/254609890 - Healthy Foods Dramatically Improves Student Academic Success www.scribd.com/doc/254613619 - City Chickens for your Organic School Garden www.scribd.com/doc/254613553 - Huerto Ecológico, Tecnologías Sostenibles, Agricultura Organica www.scribd.com/doc/254613494 - Simple Square Foot Gardening for Schools - Teacher Guide www.scribd.com/doc/254613410 - Free Organic Gardening Publications www.scribd.com/doc/254609890 ~
Animal Testing No Video
The document discusses the arguments against animal testing, describing how it causes unnecessary suffering to animals. It notes that over 10 million animals are killed each year through testing and provides examples of the types of harmful tests conducted, such as lethal dose tests. Alternatives to animal testing are presented, though it is acknowledged that some animal testing still occurs to develop vaccines and medications.
Animal testing presentation
Animal testing is commonly used to test new medicines and cosmetics, but it often causes harm to animals who are kept in small cages. While animal testing can provide some useful data for evaluating products, many tests fail to translate to humans and over 90% of experiments on animals produce results that do not benefit human health, with every 8 seconds an animal dying as a result of testing.
Animal Testing Is Immoral Ppt
Animal testing is cruel and unnecessary according to the document. It states that animal experiments cause undue suffering such as burns and edema in rabbits during Draize tests. While the results of animal tests don't necessarily translate to humans, alternative methods exist like EpiPack and Testskin that don't use animals. The document encourages consumers to consider more humane brands that avoid animal testing in order to reduce demand and end cruel practices.
Animal testing
Animal testing has led to the development of vaccines and cures that save human lives, such as treatments for diseases like polio, measles, and cancer. However, hundreds of thousands of animals are killed or harmed each year in testing for cosmetics, household products, and other goods. While some argue animal testing benefits humans and other animals through medical advances, others believe it is unethical to cause harm or death to animals for product testing. There is ongoing debate around how much animal testing is necessary and humane.
Animal Testing
A PowerPoint aimed at students informing them about animal testing, it gives both sides of the argument (for and against).
Alternatives To Animal Testing
Animal testing is commonly used for safety testing but causes harm to animals. Non-animal testing methods provide alternatives like using synthetic membranes and human cell cultures to assess skin corrosion and absorption without harming animals. These alternative methods are becoming more widely used and accepted in the cosmetics industry for tests like skin irritation and phototoxicity testing.
Animal Testing
Animal testing involves experimenting on animals to test the safety of medicines and chemicals for human use. Over 1.4 million animals were used in the United States in 2002 for testing purposes, including rabbits, dogs, cats, and primates. While animal testing has helped develop vaccines and provide human health information, it causes suffering in animals and is not always predictive of human reactions due to physiological differences between species. Alternatives to animal testing are being explored.
Animal Testing powerpoint
This document discusses potential issues around the ethics of animal testing. It notes that animals are commonly used for medical and commercial testing, but there is debate around whether this is always ethical. While animal testing has aided medical research, it is important to avoid abusing animals for research or profit. The document outlines questions on this topic, sources of further research, and potential challenges in evaluating the ethics of different types of animal testing.
Animal testing
The document discusses the issues with animal testing, describing how millions of animals are killed each year in painful experiments and tests. There are three main types of animal testing - product testing on household items and cosmetics, research testing of drugs and medical procedures, and education/training uses of live animals. Examples are given of cruel tests like putting substances in rabbits' eyes to test irritancy. The document questions the usefulness of animal testing given differences between species.
What is Wrong with Animal Experiments
This document provides an overview of arguments against animal experiments. It discusses how over 3.5 million animals are used in experiments annually in the UK, many of which experience suffering without anesthesia. It questions whether animal experiments are reliable predictors of human outcomes, citing numerous examples where drugs and treatments proved safe in animals but caused harm in humans. The document also notes that only a small percentage of animals are used for developing new medicines, and that there are growing alternative research methods that can replace animal testing while being more effective and humane.
Animal testing - Tyler Minetti
The document discusses the complex issue of animal testing. It notes that while animal testing is cruel, it is also currently necessary for testing medicines and products to ensure human safety. However, there are ethical concerns around subjecting animals to tests and many advocate for alternative testing methods. The document raises questions about humanity's role in protecting animals and whether sufficient efforts have been made to find alternatives to animal testing. Research from organizations like PETA and government regulations are presented to explore different perspectives on the controversial issue.
Animal Testing: Case Study
Animal testing involves conducting experiments on live animals to test products like cosmetics, medicines, and treatments for safety before human use. It is done to study body functions, assess chemical safety, and test drugs. While some argue it has benefits like advancing medicine, others believe it is inhumane and causes unjustified animal suffering, as non-animal alternatives now exist. The use of animals in experiments is controversial with reasonable perspectives on both sides of the issue.
Animal testing presentation
Animal testing involves using animals like mice, rats, guinea pigs, dogs, cats and rabbits to test products like perfumes, makeup, medicines and drugs. While many see animal testing as necessary for developing life-saving treatments, others argue it causes needless suffering for animals. Both sides of the debate around the positive and negative aspects of animal testing are discussed. The document provides information on which animals are used, examples of medical advances from animal research, and criticisms of animal testing from an ethical perspective.
Animal testing for and against
Animal experiments are commonly used to develop new medicines and test product safety. In 2005 in Europe, over 12 million animals were used in testing. While animal experiments have led to treatments for diseases, they cause suffering and reduce animal quality of life. There is debate around the necessity, usefulness, costs, and morality of animal testing when alternatives may be available such as non-animal models, clinical research, and epidemiological studies. Reducing animal use, refining techniques to minimize suffering, and replacing animals when possible are advocated approaches known as the Three Rs.
Stop Animal Testing
The document argues that animal testing for cosmetic and household products is cruel and unnecessary. It notes that over 25 million animals are used in testing each year, including cats, dogs, primates, and rabbits, and subjected to mutilation and death for products like nail polish, laundry detergent, and cleaning supplies. However, the document claims that animal testing is flawed and ineffective at predicting human responses, and that alternative testing methods exist that do not require harming animals. The overall message is that animal testing should be prevented and alternatives adopted in order to avoid inflicting cruelty on defenseless animals.
Current issue animal testing
The document discusses animal testing, which involves using animals in scientific research and testing, particularly to determine the safety of drugs, foods, and other substances for human use. It notes that while animal testing aims to improve human health and medicine, it raises ethical issues as it involves experimenting on and killing large numbers of animals. Alternative views are presented, with some arguing animal testing is necessary and has advanced medical research, while others believe it is inhumane and the data unreliable due to physiological differences between animals and humans. Statistics are provided on the millions of animals, predominantly rats and mice, that are used annually in testing worldwide.
Animal testing
The document discusses the cruelty of animal testing, where millions of animals are killed each year in painful experiments and tests. There are three main types of animal testing - product testing, research testing of drugs and medical procedures, and education/training where animals are used to teach anatomy. Examples are given of painful tests on rabbits and other animals. It is argued that animal experiments are often misleading when applied to humans and that stress on the animals can impact experiment results. Large numbers of dogs, cats, rabbits, rats, mice and other animals are used in research each year. The document encourages supporting brands that do not conduct animal testing.
Animal testing
The document discusses the cruelty of animal testing, where millions of animals are killed each year in painful experiments and tests. There are three main types of animal testing - product testing, research testing of drugs and medical procedures, and education/training where animals are used to teach anatomy. Examples are given of painful tests on rabbits and other animals. It is argued that animal experiments are often misleading when applied to humans and that stress on the animals can impact experiment results. Approximate numbers of different types of animals used in research each year are provided. The document encourages supporting brands that do not conduct animal testing.
More Related Content
What's hot
animal testing
The document discusses animal testing and argues that it is cruel and should not be allowed. It notes that millions of animals suffer and die in testing each year and describes some of the types of tests conducted on animals, including poisoning and physical injury. Alternatives to animal testing are presented, and several organizations opposed to animal testing are mentioned.
Animal Testing Powerpoint
There are three main types of animal testing: product testing to ensure safety after consumption, research performed for medical and scientific advancements like new drug experiments, and education and training from high school dissections to medical student training. Animal testing in Australia is legal but regulated by state and territory laws requiring approval from an authority. The National Health and Medical Research Council's Code of Practice for the Care and Use of Animals for Scientific Purposes provides the basis for practices and ensures testing is valid, humane, justifiable, and considerate. However, arguments against animal testing say it is cruel to animals as many tests result in pain, suffering, and death, and alternatives now exist.
Persuasive Powerpoint
Animal testing is commonly used to test the safety of products like cosmetics, household chemicals, and drugs. Animals are often subjected to painful experiments like toxicity tests that can cause bleeding and damage their eyes and skin. While supporters argue it is necessary for scientific research and drug development, critics point out that most medical breakthroughs have not relied on animal testing and that alternative testing methods now exist. Many countries in Europe have imposed restrictions or bans on animal testing and products tested on animals.
Animal Experimentation for Cosmetics
Animal Experimentation for Cosmetics - Resources for Healthy Children www.scribd.com/doc/254613619 - For more information, Please see Organic Edible Schoolyards & Gardening with Children www.scribd.com/doc/254613963 - Gardening with Volcanic Rock Dust www.scribd.com/doc/254613846 - Double Food Production from your School Garden with Organic Tech www.scribd.com/doc/254613765 - Free School Gardening Art Posters www.scribd.com/doc/254613694 - Increase Food Production with Companion Planting in your School Garden www.scribd.com/doc/254609890 - Healthy Foods Dramatically Improves Student Academic Success www.scribd.com/doc/254613619 - City Chickens for your Organic School Garden www.scribd.com/doc/254613553 - Huerto Ecológico, Tecnologías Sostenibles, Agricultura Organica www.scribd.com/doc/254613494 - Simple Square Foot Gardening for Schools - Teacher Guide www.scribd.com/doc/254613410 - Free Organic Gardening Publications www.scribd.com/doc/254609890 ~
Animal Testing No Video
The document discusses the arguments against animal testing, describing how it causes unnecessary suffering to animals. It notes that over 10 million animals are killed each year through testing and provides examples of the types of harmful tests conducted, such as lethal dose tests. Alternatives to animal testing are presented, though it is acknowledged that some animal testing still occurs to develop vaccines and medications.
Animal testing presentation
Animal testing is commonly used to test new medicines and cosmetics, but it often causes harm to animals who are kept in small cages. While animal testing can provide some useful data for evaluating products, many tests fail to translate to humans and over 90% of experiments on animals produce results that do not benefit human health, with every 8 seconds an animal dying as a result of testing.
Animal Testing Is Immoral Ppt
Animal testing is cruel and unnecessary according to the document. It states that animal experiments cause undue suffering such as burns and edema in rabbits during Draize tests. While the results of animal tests don't necessarily translate to humans, alternative methods exist like EpiPack and Testskin that don't use animals. The document encourages consumers to consider more humane brands that avoid animal testing in order to reduce demand and end cruel practices.
Animal testing
Animal testing has led to the development of vaccines and cures that save human lives, such as treatments for diseases like polio, measles, and cancer. However, hundreds of thousands of animals are killed or harmed each year in testing for cosmetics, household products, and other goods. While some argue animal testing benefits humans and other animals through medical advances, others believe it is unethical to cause harm or death to animals for product testing. There is ongoing debate around how much animal testing is necessary and humane.
Animal Testing
A PowerPoint aimed at students informing them about animal testing, it gives both sides of the argument (for and against).
Alternatives To Animal Testing
Animal testing is commonly used for safety testing but causes harm to animals. Non-animal testing methods provide alternatives like using synthetic membranes and human cell cultures to assess skin corrosion and absorption without harming animals. These alternative methods are becoming more widely used and accepted in the cosmetics industry for tests like skin irritation and phototoxicity testing.
Animal Testing
Animal testing involves experimenting on animals to test the safety of medicines and chemicals for human use. Over 1.4 million animals were used in the United States in 2002 for testing purposes, including rabbits, dogs, cats, and primates. While animal testing has helped develop vaccines and provide human health information, it causes suffering in animals and is not always predictive of human reactions due to physiological differences between species. Alternatives to animal testing are being explored.
Animal Testing powerpoint
This document discusses potential issues around the ethics of animal testing. It notes that animals are commonly used for medical and commercial testing, but there is debate around whether this is always ethical. While animal testing has aided medical research, it is important to avoid abusing animals for research or profit. The document outlines questions on this topic, sources of further research, and potential challenges in evaluating the ethics of different types of animal testing.
Animal testing
The document discusses the issues with animal testing, describing how millions of animals are killed each year in painful experiments and tests. There are three main types of animal testing - product testing on household items and cosmetics, research testing of drugs and medical procedures, and education/training uses of live animals. Examples are given of cruel tests like putting substances in rabbits' eyes to test irritancy. The document questions the usefulness of animal testing given differences between species.
What is Wrong with Animal Experiments
This document provides an overview of arguments against animal experiments. It discusses how over 3.5 million animals are used in experiments annually in the UK, many of which experience suffering without anesthesia. It questions whether animal experiments are reliable predictors of human outcomes, citing numerous examples where drugs and treatments proved safe in animals but caused harm in humans. The document also notes that only a small percentage of animals are used for developing new medicines, and that there are growing alternative research methods that can replace animal testing while being more effective and humane.
Animal testing - Tyler Minetti
The document discusses the complex issue of animal testing. It notes that while animal testing is cruel, it is also currently necessary for testing medicines and products to ensure human safety. However, there are ethical concerns around subjecting animals to tests and many advocate for alternative testing methods. The document raises questions about humanity's role in protecting animals and whether sufficient efforts have been made to find alternatives to animal testing. Research from organizations like PETA and government regulations are presented to explore different perspectives on the controversial issue.
Animal Testing: Case Study
Animal testing involves conducting experiments on live animals to test products like cosmetics, medicines, and treatments for safety before human use. It is done to study body functions, assess chemical safety, and test drugs. While some argue it has benefits like advancing medicine, others believe it is inhumane and causes unjustified animal suffering, as non-animal alternatives now exist. The use of animals in experiments is controversial with reasonable perspectives on both sides of the issue.
Animal testing presentation
Animal testing involves using animals like mice, rats, guinea pigs, dogs, cats and rabbits to test products like perfumes, makeup, medicines and drugs. While many see animal testing as necessary for developing life-saving treatments, others argue it causes needless suffering for animals. Both sides of the debate around the positive and negative aspects of animal testing are discussed. The document provides information on which animals are used, examples of medical advances from animal research, and criticisms of animal testing from an ethical perspective.
Animal testing for and against
Animal experiments are commonly used to develop new medicines and test product safety. In 2005 in Europe, over 12 million animals were used in testing. While animal experiments have led to treatments for diseases, they cause suffering and reduce animal quality of life. There is debate around the necessity, usefulness, costs, and morality of animal testing when alternatives may be available such as non-animal models, clinical research, and epidemiological studies. Reducing animal use, refining techniques to minimize suffering, and replacing animals when possible are advocated approaches known as the Three Rs.
Stop Animal Testing
The document argues that animal testing for cosmetic and household products is cruel and unnecessary. It notes that over 25 million animals are used in testing each year, including cats, dogs, primates, and rabbits, and subjected to mutilation and death for products like nail polish, laundry detergent, and cleaning supplies. However, the document claims that animal testing is flawed and ineffective at predicting human responses, and that alternative testing methods exist that do not require harming animals. The overall message is that animal testing should be prevented and alternatives adopted in order to avoid inflicting cruelty on defenseless animals.
Current issue animal testing
The document discusses animal testing, which involves using animals in scientific research and testing, particularly to determine the safety of drugs, foods, and other substances for human use. It notes that while animal testing aims to improve human health and medicine, it raises ethical issues as it involves experimenting on and killing large numbers of animals. Alternative views are presented, with some arguing animal testing is necessary and has advanced medical research, while others believe it is inhumane and the data unreliable due to physiological differences between animals and humans. Statistics are provided on the millions of animals, predominantly rats and mice, that are used annually in testing worldwide.
What's hot (20)
Similar to medicines on the lives of innocent animals
Animal testing
The document discusses the cruelty of animal testing, where millions of animals are killed each year in painful experiments and tests. There are three main types of animal testing - product testing, research testing of drugs and medical procedures, and education/training where animals are used to teach anatomy. Examples are given of painful tests on rabbits and other animals. It is argued that animal experiments are often misleading when applied to humans and that stress on the animals can impact experiment results. Large numbers of dogs, cats, rabbits, rats, mice and other animals are used in research each year. The document encourages supporting brands that do not conduct animal testing.
Animal testing
The document discusses the cruelty of animal testing, where millions of animals are killed each year in painful experiments and tests. There are three main types of animal testing - product testing, research testing of drugs and medical procedures, and education/training where animals are used to teach anatomy. Examples are given of painful tests on rabbits and other animals. It is argued that animal experiments are often misleading when applied to humans and that stress on the animals can impact experiment results. Approximate numbers of different types of animals used in research each year are provided. The document encourages supporting brands that do not conduct animal testing.
Aniaml testing essay
Animal testing causes immense suffering for millions of animals each year. Experiments involve injecting animals with drugs, exposing them to radiation, removing organs, forcing inhalation of toxic gases, and inducing anxiety and depression. Most experiments provide no anesthesia, and over 70% do not reduce animal suffering. Common animals used are rats, mice, monkeys and rabbits, which experience stress, disease, and painful procedures without relief from harm. Animal testing is conducted by cosmetics and pharmaceutical companies to test products despite the cruelty involved.
abdikhaalaq hussein h. al
Animal testing is commonly used in three areas: medical research, cosmetics testing, and toxicology. In medical research, animals are used to test new drugs and substances for human safety. Cosmetics are also tested on animals to determine their effects. There are arguments both for and against animal testing, as it has helped advance human and animal medicine but also causes animal suffering. While there are no complete alternatives currently, technology is advancing to reduce reliance on animal testing over time.
Animal Experimentation- Contemporary Issue
Animals have their own rights. They are not puppet of our laboratory. With the help of modern and scientific technology we can change old traditional animal experiment methods.
Experiments And Tests On Animals (Case study)
Experiments and tests on animals have occurred for centuries, beginning with ancient Greek physicians dissecting animals. While experimentation has provided medical advances, it causes suffering to animals and raises ethical issues. Today, animal testing is regulated in some places but still widespread, with mice, rats, fish and rabbits most commonly used to develop medicines, study disease and toxicity, and for education and military research. There is ongoing debate around alternatives to animal testing and whether the benefits justify the costs to animal welfare.
Sonakshi
Animal testing is used by scientists to determine if products are safe for human use. However, animals experience stress, loss of control over their lives, and inability to engage in natural behaviors. They are tested repeatedly until deemed unusable, then euthanized. Alternatives to animal testing include computer modeling and in vitro testing using human cells, which promises no issues if successfully tested since it uses human cells. Over 100 million animals are abused in labs annually in the U.S., with few legal protections, and 92% of drugs passing animal tests still fail in humans.
Animals testing should be banned
The document discusses arguments for and against animal testing. Proponents argue that animal testing is necessary for developing medical treatments and ensuring vaccine safety. However, critics argue that animal testing is cruel, alternatives exist, animals are poor predictors of human outcomes, and that most animals used in experiments receive no legal protections from abuse. The document also discusses the suffering of animals in experiments and arguments for reducing but not completely banning animal testing.
Bioethics presentation
The document discusses animal testing and some of the ethical issues surrounding it. It notes that while controversial, animal research has allowed medical and scientific advances. Around 50-100 million animals are used in research each year. The document explores how pain and suffering in animal testing is measured, and outlines some of the arguments made by proponents and opponents of animal testing. It also discusses alternatives to animal testing such as the three R's of replacement, reduction and refinement.
Similar to medicines on the lives of innocent animals (9)
Recently uploaded
Gadgets for management of stored product pests_Dr.UPR.pdf
Insectsplayamajorroleinthedeteriorationoffoodgrainscausingbothquantitativeandqualitativelosses
Wellprovedthatnogranariescanbefilledwithgrainswithoutinsectsastheharvestedproducecontainegg(or)larvae(or)pupae(or)adultinsectinthembecauseoffieldcarryoverinfestationwhichcannotbeavoidedindevelopingcountrieslikeIndia
Simpletechnologiesfortimelydetectionofinsectsinthestoredproduceandtherebyplantimelycontrolmeasures
Evidence of Jet Activity from the Secondary Black Hole in the OJ 287 Binary S...
Wereport the study of a huge optical intraday flare on 2021 November 12 at 2 a.m. UT in the blazar OJ287. In the binary black hole model, it is associated with an impact of the secondary black hole on the accretion disk of the primary. Our multifrequency observing campaign was set up to search for such a signature of the impact based on a prediction made 8 yr earlier. The first I-band results of the flare have already been reported by Kishore et al. (2024). Here we combine these data with our monitoring in the R-band. There is a big change in the R–I spectral index by 1.0 ±0.1 between the normal background and the flare, suggesting a new component of radiation. The polarization variation during the rise of the flare suggests the same. The limits on the source size place it most reasonably in the jet of the secondary BH. We then ask why we have not seen this phenomenon before. We show that OJ287 was never before observed with sufficient sensitivity on the night when the flare should have happened according to the binary model. We also study the probability that this flare is just an oversized example of intraday variability using the Krakow data set of intense monitoring between 2015 and 2023. We find that the occurrence of a flare of this size and rapidity is unlikely. In machine-readable Tables 1 and 2, we give the full orbit-linked historical light curve of OJ287 as well as the dense monitoring sample of Krakow.
Holsinger, Bruce W. - Music, body and desire in medieval culture [2001].pdf
Music and Medieval History
Methods of grain storage Structures in India.pdf
•Post-harvestlossesaccountforabout10%oftotalfoodgrainsduetounscientificstorage,insects,rodents,micro-organismsetc.,
•Totalfoodgrainproductioninindiais311milliontonnesandstorageis145mt.InIndia,annualstoragelosseshavebeenestimated14mtworthofRs.7,000croreinwhichinsectsaloneaccountfornearlyRs.1,300crores.
•InIndiaoutofthetotalproduction,about30%ismarketablesurplus
•Remaining70%isretainedandstoredbyfarmersforconsumption,seed,feed.Hence,growerneedstoragefacilitytoholdaportionofproducetosellwhenthemarketingpriceisfavourable
•TradersandCo-operativesatmarketcentresneedstoragestructurestoholdgrainswhenthetransportfacilityisinadequate
The cost of acquiring information by natural selection
This is a short talk that I gave at the Banff International Research Station workshop on Modeling and Theory in Population Biology. The idea is to try to understand how the burden of natural selection relates to the amount of information that selection puts into the genome.
It's based on the first part of this research paper:
The cost of information acquisition by natural selection
Ryan Seamus McGee, Olivia Kosterlitz, Artem Kaznatcheev, Benjamin Kerr, Carl T. Bergstrom
bioRxiv 2022.07.02.498577; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.07.02.498577
Injection: Risks and challenges - Injection of CO2 into geological rock forma...
Presentation by Dr. Florian Krob, Workshop "Risks of CO2 storage - How can they be addressed and reduced?", 22.4.2024
TOPIC OF DISCUSSION: CENTRIFUGATION SLIDESHARE.pptx
Centrifugation is a powerful technique used in laboratories to separate components of a heterogeneous mixture based on their density. This process utilizes centrifugal force to rapidly spin samples, causing denser particles to migrate outward more quickly than lighter ones. As a result, distinct layers form within the sample tube, allowing for easy isolation and purification of target substances.
Pests of Storage_Identification_Dr.UPR.pdf
InIndia-post-harvestlosses-unscientificstorage,insects,rodents,micro-organismsetc.,accountforabout10percentoftotalfoodgrains
Graininfestation
Directdamage
Indirectly
•theexuviae,skin,deadinsects
•theirexcretawhichmakefoodunfitforhumanconsumption
About600speciesofinsectshavebeenassociatedwithstoredgrainproducts
100speciesofinsectpestsofstoredproductscauseeconomiclosses
Sustainable Land Management - Climate Smart Agriculture
Sustainable Land Management - Climate Smart AgricultureInternational Food Policy Research Institute- South Asia Office
PPT on Sustainable Land Management presented at the three-day 'Training and Validation Workshop on Modules of Climate Smart Agriculture (CSA) Technologies in South Asia' workshop on April 22, 2024.
Sexuality - Issues, Attitude and Behaviour - Applied Social Psychology - Psyc...
A proprietary approach developed by bringing together the best of learning theories from Psychology, design principles from the world of visualization, and pedagogical methods from over a decade of training experience, that enables you to: Learn better, faster!
Embracing Deep Variability For Reproducibility and Replicability
Embracing Deep Variability For Reproducibility and ReplicabilityUniversity of Rennes, INSA Rennes, Inria/IRISA, CNRS
Embracing Deep Variability For Reproducibility and Replicability
Abstract: Reproducibility (aka determinism in some cases) constitutes a fundamental aspect in various fields of computer science, such as floating-point computations in numerical analysis and simulation, concurrency models in parallelism, reproducible builds for third parties integration and packaging, and containerization for execution environments. These concepts, while pervasive across diverse concerns, often exhibit intricate inter-dependencies, making it challenging to achieve a comprehensive understanding. In this short and vision paper we delve into the application of software engineering techniques, specifically variability management, to systematically identify and explicit points of variability that may give rise to reproducibility issues (eg language, libraries, compiler, virtual machine, OS, environment variables, etc). The primary objectives are: i) gaining insights into the variability layers and their possible interactions, ii) capturing and documenting configurations for the sake of reproducibility, and iii) exploring diverse configurations to replicate, and hence validate and ensure the robustness of results. By adopting these methodologies, we aim to address the complexities associated with reproducibility and replicability in modern software systems and environments, facilitating a more comprehensive and nuanced perspective on these critical aspects.
https://hal.science/hal-04582287
Discovery of An Apparent Red, High-Velocity Type Ia Supernova at 𝐳 = 2.9 wi...
We present the JWST discovery of SN 2023adsy, a transient object located in a host galaxy JADES-GS
+
53.13485
−
27.82088
with a host spectroscopic redshift of
2.903
±
0.007
. The transient was identified in deep James Webb Space Telescope (JWST)/NIRCam imaging from the JWST Advanced Deep Extragalactic Survey (JADES) program. Photometric and spectroscopic followup with NIRCam and NIRSpec, respectively, confirm the redshift and yield UV-NIR light-curve, NIR color, and spectroscopic information all consistent with a Type Ia classification. Despite its classification as a likely SN Ia, SN 2023adsy is both fairly red (
�
(
�
−
�
)
∼
0.9
) despite a host galaxy with low-extinction and has a high Ca II velocity (
19
,
000
±
2
,
000
km/s) compared to the general population of SNe Ia. While these characteristics are consistent with some Ca-rich SNe Ia, particularly SN 2016hnk, SN 2023adsy is intrinsically brighter than the low-
�
Ca-rich population. Although such an object is too red for any low-
�
cosmological sample, we apply a fiducial standardization approach to SN 2023adsy and find that the SN 2023adsy luminosity distance measurement is in excellent agreement (
≲
1
�
) with
Λ
CDM. Therefore unlike low-
�
Ca-rich SNe Ia, SN 2023adsy is standardizable and gives no indication that SN Ia standardized luminosities change significantly with redshift. A larger sample of distant SNe Ia is required to determine if SN Ia population characteristics at high-
�
truly diverge from their low-
�
counterparts, and to confirm that standardized luminosities nevertheless remain constant with redshift.
Reaching the age of Adolescence- Class 8
This is a presentation on understanding the age of adolescence.
Male reproduction physiology by Suyash Garg .pptx
Physiology of Male reproduction.
Video mentioned at page no. 23 as summary for better understanding
Quality assurance B.pharm 6th semester BP606T UNIT 5
Warehousing
Good warehousing practices
Material management
Recently uploaded (20)
Gadgets for management of stored product pests_Dr.UPR.pdf
Gadgets for management of stored product pests_Dr.UPR.pdf
Introduction_Ch_01_Biotech Biotechnology course .pptx
Introduction_Ch_01_Biotech Biotechnology course .pptx
Evidence of Jet Activity from the Secondary Black Hole in the OJ 287 Binary S...
Evidence of Jet Activity from the Secondary Black Hole in the OJ 287 Binary S...
Holsinger, Bruce W. - Music, body and desire in medieval culture [2001].pdf
Holsinger, Bruce W. - Music, body and desire in medieval culture [2001].pdf
The cost of acquiring information by natural selection
The cost of acquiring information by natural selection
Injection: Risks and challenges - Injection of CO2 into geological rock forma...
Injection: Risks and challenges - Injection of CO2 into geological rock forma...
TOPIC OF DISCUSSION: CENTRIFUGATION SLIDESHARE.pptx
TOPIC OF DISCUSSION: CENTRIFUGATION SLIDESHARE.pptx
Sustainable Land Management - Climate Smart Agriculture
Sustainable Land Management - Climate Smart Agriculture
Microbiology of Central Nervous System INFECTIONS.pdf
Microbiology of Central Nervous System INFECTIONS.pdf
Sexuality - Issues, Attitude and Behaviour - Applied Social Psychology - Psyc...
Sexuality - Issues, Attitude and Behaviour - Applied Social Psychology - Psyc...
Embracing Deep Variability For Reproducibility and Replicability
Embracing Deep Variability For Reproducibility and Replicability
Discovery of An Apparent Red, High-Velocity Type Ia Supernova at 𝐳 = 2.9 wi...
Discovery of An Apparent Red, High-Velocity Type Ia Supernova at 𝐳 = 2.9 wi...
Quality assurance B.pharm 6th semester BP606T UNIT 5
Quality assurance B.pharm 6th semester BP606T UNIT 5
medicines on the lives of innocent animals
- 1. Medicine at the lives of innocent animal Kanza saleem
- 2. ANIMAL TESTING The use of non-human animals in research and development projects, especially for purposes of determining the safety of substances such as foods or drugs.
- 3. What are animals tested for? Product testing is the testing of products such as soaps, cosmetics, household cleaners and pesticides on animals to ensure they are safe for human use. Research uses the testing of drugs and medical procedures on animals. Education and training uses animals to teach anatomy and to train medical students
- 4. What kinds of animals do they test on? Mice Rats Cats Dogs Rabbits Farm Animal pigs
- 5. Types of Tests The Draize Eye Test Dermal Toxicity Test Lethal Dose Tests
- 6. How many animals suffer? Approximately 17- 32 million animals are used in research each year 65,000 Dogs 20,000 Cats 30,000 Sheep 245,000 Rabbits Over a million Rats & Mice 175,000 Hamsters 57,000 Primates 58,000 Pigs
- 7. What do the animals go through? Poisoned burned scalded Irradiated genetically manipulated physically injured inflicted with deadly diseases and surgically mutilated.
- 9. What’s the point of testing when: Animal tests and human results match only 5%-25% of the time. Rats are only 37% effective in determining what causes cancer in humans. The stress that animals endure in labs can effect experiments, making the results meaningless. One international study that examined the results of rat and mouse LD50 tests for 50 chemicals found that these tests were able to predict toxicity in humans with only 65 percent accuracy
- 10. Is all of this really necessary?
- 11. Alternatives to Animal Testing Episkin-a reconstructed human in vitro epidermis for evaluation of cosmetics, pharmaceutical and chemical compounds. Epiocular-a reproducible, multi-layered human cell- derived tissue for testing ocular irritancy of chemicals and other materials. Epiderm-is a reproducible, three-dimensional, human cell-derived skin tissue for studies of corrosives and irritants. Micro dosing
- 12. Benefits of non-animal testing Alternative scientific tests are often more reliable than animal tests. The use of human tissue in toxicity testing is more accurate than the animal models. Non-animal tests are more cost-effective, practical, and expedient. Cruelty-free products are more environmentally friendly.
- 13. Thank you