2. Comparison of Typing Speeds on Different Types of Keyboards and Factors Influencing It, Siddharth
Ghoshal, Gaurav Acharya, Journal Impact Factor (2015): 8.8293 Calculated by GISI
(www.jifactor.com)
www.iaeme.com/ijmet.asp 96 editor@iaeme.com
facilitate this, fins are provided on the outer surface of the cylinder. An attempt is made to simulate
the heat transfer using CFD analysis. The heat transfer surface of the engine is modeled in GAMBIT
and simulated in FLUENT software. An expression of average fin surface heat transfer coefficient in
terms of wind velocity is obtained. It is observed that when the ambient temperature reduces to a
very low value, it results in overcooling and poor efficiency of the engine. In the paper by U. V.
Awasarmol and Dr. A. T. Pise[3]
, the outcome of experimental study conducted to compare the rate
of heat transfer with solid and permeable fins and the effect of angle of inclination of fins. Permeable
fins are formed by modifying the solid rectangular fins by drilling three inline holes per fin. Solid
and Permeable fin block are kept in isolated chamber to study the natural convection heat transfer.
Natural convection heat transfer through of each of these blocks was compared in terms of variations
in steady state temperatures of base and tip. The steady state temperatures were recorded at constant
heat flux condition. At the same time the steady state temperatures were recorded for different angles
of inclination of fins. Blocks having solid and permeable fins were tested for different inputs
(i.e.15W, 20W). Also the blocks were rotated through the different angles of inclination of fins
(i.e.00
, 150
, 300
, 450
, 600
, 750
, 900
). It is found that using permeable fins, heat transfer rate is
improved and convective heat transfer coefficient increases by about 20% as compared to solid fins
with reduction of cost of the material 30%. And the optimum angle of inclination of fins is 900 i.e.
vertical fins. It is also found out that the permeable fins are cooler than the solid fins and the
minimum base temperature is recorded at 900
angle. In the paper by, A Dewan, P Patro, I Khan,and P
Mahanta[4]
, presents a computational study of the steady-state thermal and air-flow resistance
characteristics and performance analysis through a rectangular channel with circular pin fins attached
to a flat surface. The pin fins are arranged in staggered manner and the heat transfer is assumed to be
conjugated in nature. The body forces and radiation effects are assumed to be negligible. The
hydrodynamic and thermal behaviours are studied in detail for the Reynolds numbers varying from
200 to 1000. The heat transfer increases with an increase of the fin density along the stream wise
direction. For the same surface area and pumping power, the fin materials with large thermal
conductivity provide high heat transfer rate with no increase in the pressure drop. The emphasis of
the present research work is not only to look into the traditional objective of maximum heat transfer
in a heat exchanger, but also to obtain it with minimum pressure drop.
II.METHODOLOGY
A. Specifications and Material data
Fig 2.1 Rectangular shape FIN body with 3mm size
3. Comparison of Typing Speeds on Different Types of Keyboards and Factors Influencing It, Siddharth
Ghoshal, Gaurav Acharya, Journal Impact Factor (2015): 8.8293 Calculated by GISI
(www.jifactor.com)
www.iaeme.com/ijmet.asp 97 editor@iaeme.com
Fig 2.2 circular shape FIN body with 3mm size
Fig 2.3 curve shape FIN body with 3mm size
Aluminum Alloy 204
Thermal Conductivity – 120 w/mk,
Specific Heat – 0.963 J/g ºC,
Density – 2.8 g/cc.
Magnesium
Thermal Conductivity – 159 w/mk,
Specific Heat – 1.45 J/g ºC,
Density – 2.48 g/cc.
Aluminum Alloy 7075
Thermal Conductivity – 173 w/mk,
Specific Heat – 0.960 J/g ºC,
Density – 2.7 g/cc.
Beryllium
Thermal Conductivity – 216 w/mk,
Specific Heat – 0.927 J/g ºC,
Density – 1.87 g/cc.
Film Co-efficient – 25 W/mmK,
Bulk Temperature – 313 K.
The specifications and geometry of an object with different shape is shown in figure 2.1, 2.2
and 2.3. The FIN body thickness is designed in varies thickness as 3mm and 2.5mm
B. Modeling of cylinder fin body
This work involved creating a solid model of the helical spring using Pro/ENGINEER
software with the given specifications and analyzing the same model using ANSYS software. The
modal is created according to the parameters as shown in figure 2.4 in different shapes with varying
fin thickness
4. Comparison of Typing Speeds on Different Types of Keyboards and Factors Influencing It, Siddharth
Ghoshal, Gaurav Acharya, Journal Impact Factor (2015): 8.8293 Calculated by GISI
(www.jifactor.com)
www.iaeme.com/ijmet.asp 98 editor@iaeme.com
Fig: 2.4 cylinder fin body parameters
C. Analysis of modeled cylinder fin body
A model of the cylinder fin body was created using Pro/Engineer software. Then the model
will be imported to analysis using FEA in this connection ANSYS software is used. ANSYS to
complete thermal analysis for detemining maximum heat transfer rate and minimum heat transfer
rate in W/mm2
. The temperature is maximum inside the cylinder with value in ‘K’ and decreasing to
outside still reducing on the fins.
5. Comparison of Typing Speeds on Different Types of Keyboards and Factors Influencing It, Siddharth
Ghoshal, Gaurav Acharya, Journal Impact Factor (2015): 8.8293 Calculated by GISI
(www.jifactor.com)
www.iaeme.com/ijmet.asp 99 editor@iaeme.com
3mm CYLINDER FIN THICKNESS MAGNESIUM
NODAL TEMPERATURE
Fig 2.5 Rectangle shaped Magnesium at Nodal Temperature with 3mm Thickness
The temperature is maximum inside the cylinder with value of 530.778K and decreasing to
outside with 476.333K and is still reducing on the fins.
THERMAL GRADIENT SUM
Fig 2.6 Rectangle shaped Magnesium with Thermal Gradient Vector Sum with 3mm Thickness
The change in temperature is in the maximum of 66.8294K/mm to 75.254K/mm and
minimum of 8.36156K/mm
THERMAL FLUX SUM
Fig 2.7 Rectangle shaped Magnesium with Thermal Flux Vector Sum with 3mm Thickness
The maximum heat transfer rate is 11.9654 W/mm2
and minimum heat transfer rate is 1.329
W/mm2
.
6. Comparison of Typing Speeds on Different Types of Keyboards and Factors Influencing It, Siddharth
Ghoshal, Gaurav Acharya, Journal Impact Factor (2015): 8.8293 Calculated by GISI
(www.jifactor.com)
www.iaeme.com/ijmet.asp 100 editor@iaeme.com
ALUMINUM ALLOY 7075
NODALTEMPERATURE
Fig 2.8 Rectangle shaped Aluminum Alloy 7075 at Nodal Temperature with 3mm Thickness
The temperature is maximum inside the cylinder with value of 530.778K and decreasing to
outside with 476.333K and is still reducing on the fins.
THERMAL GRADIENT SUM
Fig 2.9 Rectangle shaped Aluminum Alloy 7075 with Thermal Gradient Vector Sum with 3mm
Thickness
The change in temperature is in the maximum of 62.8741K/mm to 70.7334K/mm and
minimum of 7.859K/mm
THERMAL FLUX SUM
Fig 2.10 Rectangle shaped Aluminum Alloy 7075 with Thermal Flux Vector Sum with 3mm
Thickness
The maximum heat transfer rate is 12.2369 W/mm2
and minimum heat transfer rate is 1.35 W/mm2
.
7. Comparison of Typing Speeds on Different Types of Keyboards and Factors Influencing It, Siddharth
Ghoshal, Gaurav Acharya, Journal Impact Factor (2015): 8.8293 Calculated by GISI
(www.jifactor.com)
www.iaeme.com/ijmet.asp 101 editor@iaeme.com
BERYLLIUM
NODAL TEMPERATURE
Fig 2.11 Rectangle shaped Beryllium at Nodal Temperature with 3mm Thickness
The temperature is maximum inside the cylinder with value of 530.778K and decreasing to
outside with 476.333K and is still reducing on the fins.
THERMAL GRADIENT SUM
Fig 2.12 Rectangle shaped Beryllium Thermal Gradient Vector Sum with 3mm Thickness
The change in temperature is in the maximum of 53.1054K/mm to 59.747K/mm and
minimum of 6.638K/mm
THERMAL FLUX SUM
Fig 2.13 Rectangle shaped Beryllium Thermal Flux Vector Sum with 3mm Thickness
8. Comparison of Typing Speeds on Different Types of Keyboards and Factors Influencing It, Siddharth
Ghoshal, Gaurav Acharya, Journal Impact Factor (2015): 8.8293 Calculated by GISI
(www.jifactor.com)
www.iaeme.com/ijmet.asp 102 editor@iaeme.com
The maximum heat transfer rate is 12.9054 W/mm2
and minimum heat transfer rate is
1.43394 W/mm2
.
2.5mm Thickness
ALUMINUM ALLOY 204
NODAL TEMPERATURE
Fig 2.14 Rectangle Shaped Aluminum Alloy 204 with Nodal Temperature with 2.5mm Thickness
The temperature is maximum inside the cylinder with value of 530.768K and decreasing to
outside with 476.304K and is still reducing on the fins.
THERMAL GRADIENT SUM
Fig 2.15 Rectangle shaped Aluminum Alloy 204 with Thermal Gradient Vector Sum with 2.5mm
Thickness
The change in temperature is in the maximum of 170.122K/mm to 151.22K/mm and
minimum of 18.9025K/mm
THERMAL FLUX SUM
Fig 2.16 Rectangle shaped Aluminum Alloy 204 with Thermal Flux Vector Sum with 2.5mm
Thickness
The maximum heat transfer rate is 20.4146 W/mm2
and minimum heat transfer rate is
2.26829 W/mm2
.
9. Comparison of Typing Speeds on Different Types of Keyboards and Factors Influencing It, Siddharth
Ghoshal, Gaurav Acharya, Journal Impact Factor (2015): 8.8293 Calculated by GISI
(www.jifactor.com)
www.iaeme.com/ijmet.asp 103 editor@iaeme.com
MAGNESIUM
NODAL TEMPERATURE
Fig 2.17 Rectangle shaped Magnesium at Nodal Temperature with 2.5mm Thickness
The temperature is maximum inside the cylinder with value of 530.778K and decreasing to
outside with 476.333K and is still reducing on the fins.
THERMAL GRADIENT SUM
Fig 2.18 Rectangle shaped Magnesium with Thermal Gradient Vector Sum with 2.5mm Thickness
The change in temperature is in the maximum of 125.126K/mm to 140.767K/mm and
minimu of 15.6407K/mm
THERMAL FLUX SUM
Fig 2.19 Rectangle shaped Magnesium with Thermal Flux Vector Sum with 2.5mm Thickness
The maximum heat transfer rate is 22.3819 W/mm2
and minimum heat transfer rate is 2.486 W/mm
10. Comparison of Typing Speeds on Different Types of Keyboards and Factors Influencing It, Siddharth
Ghoshal, Gaurav Acharya, Journal Impact Factor (2015): 8.8293 Calculated by GISI
(www.jifactor.com)
www.iaeme.com/ijmet.asp 104 editor@iaeme.com
ALUMINUM ALLOY 7075
NODAL TEMPERATURE
Fig 2.20 Rectangle shaped Aluminum Alloy 7075 at Nodal Temperature with 2.5mm Thickness
The temperature is maximum inside the cylinder with value of 530.778K and decreasing to
outside with 476.333K and is still reducing on the fins.
THERMAL GRADIENT SUM
Fig 2.21 Rectangle shaped Aluminum Alloy 7075 with Thermal Gradient Vector Sum with 2.5mm
Thickness
The change in temperature is in the maximum of 118.221K/mm to 132.998K/mm and
minimum of 14.7776K/mm
THERMAL FLUX SUM
Fig 2.22 Rectangle shaped Aluminum Alloy 7075 with Thermal Flux Vector Sum with 2.5mm
Thickness
11. Comparison of Typing Speeds on Different Types of Keyboards and Factors Influencing It, Siddharth
Ghoshal, Gaurav Acharya, Journal Impact Factor (2015): 8.8293 Calculated by GISI
(www.jifactor.com)
www.iaeme.com/ijmet.asp 105 editor@iaeme.com
The maximum heat transfer rate is 23.0087 W/mm2
and minimum heat transfer rate is
2.55652 W/mm2
BERYLLIUM
NODAL TEMPERATURE
Fig 2.23 Rectangle shaped Beryllium at Nodal Temperature with 2.5mm Thickness
The temperature is maximum inside the cylinder with value of 530.778K and decreasing to
outside with 476.333K and is still reducing on the fins.
THERMAL GRADIENT SUM
Fig 2.24 Rectangle shaped Beryllium with Thermal Gradient Vector Sum with 2.5mm Thickness
The change in temperature is in the maximum of 117.382K/mm to 132.021K/mm and
minimum of 14.6691K/mm
THERMAL FLUX SUM
Fig 2.25 Rectangle shaped Beryllium with Thermal Flux Vector Sum with 2.5mm Thickness
The maximum heat transfer rate is 25.5166 W/mm2
and minimum heat transfer rate is
3.16852 W/mm2
.
12. Comparison of Typing Speeds on Different Types of Keyboards and Factors Influencing It, Siddharth
Ghoshal, Gaurav Acharya, Journal Impact Factor (2015): 8.8293 Calculated by GISI
(www.jifactor.com)
www.iaeme.com/ijmet.asp 106 editor@iaeme.com
CIRCULAR
1 3mm Thickness
ALUMINUM ALLOY 204
NODAL TEMPERATURE
Fig 2.26 Circular shaped Aluminum Alloy 204 at Nodal Temperature with 3mm Thickness
The temperature is maximum inside the cylinder with value of 549.311K and decreasing to
outside with 531.932K and is still reducing on the fins.
THERMALGRADIENTSUM
Fig 2.27 Circular shaped Aluminum Alloy 204 with Thermal Gradient Vector Sum with 3mm
Thickness
The change in temperature is in the maximum of 2.663K/mm to 2.995K/mm and minimum of
0.339126K/mm
THERMAL FLUX SUM
Fig 2.28 Circular shaped Aluminum Alloy 204 with Thermal Flux Vector Sum with 3mm Thickness
13. Comparison of Typing Speeds on Different Types of Keyboards and Factors Influencing It, Siddharth
Ghoshal, Gaurav Acharya, Journal Impact Factor (2015): 8.8293 Calculated by GISI
(www.jifactor.com)
www.iaeme.com/ijmet.asp 107 editor@iaeme.com
The maximum heat transfer rate is 0.359344 W/mm2
and minimum heat transfer rate is
0.040695 W/mm2
.
MAGNESIUM
NODAL TEMPERATURE
Fig 2.29 Circular shaped Magnesium at Nodal Temperature with 3mm Thickness
The temperature is maximum inside the cylinder with value of 551.001K and decreasing to
outside with 537.003K and is still reducing on the fins.
THERMAL GRADIENT SUM
Fig 2.30 Circular shaped Magnesium with Thermal Gradient Vector Sum with 3mm Thickness
The change in temperature is in the maximum of 2.372K/mm to 0.26728K/mm and minimum
of 10.1845K/mm
THERMAL FLUX SUM
Fig 2.31 Circular shaped Magnesium with Thermal Flux Vector Sum with 3mm Thickness
14. Comparison of Typing Speeds on Different Types of Keyboards and Factors Influencing It, Siddharth
Ghoshal, Gaurav Acharya, Journal Impact Factor (2015): 8.8293 Calculated by GISI
(www.jifactor.com)
www.iaeme.com/ijmet.asp 108 editor@iaeme.com
The maximum heat transfer rate is 0.377153 W/mm2
and minimum heat transfer rate is
0.042497 W/mm2
ALUMINUM ALLOY 7075
NODAL TEMPERATURE
Fig 2.33 Circular shaped Aluminum Alloy 7075 at Nodal Temperature with 3mm Thickness
The temperature is maximum inside the cylinder with value of 551.497K and decreasing to
outside with 538.492K and is still reducing on the fins.
THERMAL GRADIENT SUM
Fig 2.34 Circular shaped Aluminum Alloy 7075 with Thermal Gradient Vector Sum with 3mm
Thickness
The change in temperature is in the maximum of 2.12012K/mm to 0.240787K/mm and
minimu of 10.1845K/mm
THERMAL FLUX SUM
Fig 2.35 Circular shaped Aluminum Alloy 7075 with Thermal Flux Vector Sum with 3mm
Thickness
15. Comparison of Typing Speeds on Different Types of Keyboards and Factors Influencing It, Siddharth
Ghoshal, Gaurav Acharya, Journal Impact Factor (2015): 8.8293 Calculated by GISI
(www.jifactor.com)
www.iaeme.com/ijmet.asp 109 editor@iaeme.com
The maximum heat transfer rate is 0.36678 W/mm2
and minimum heat transfer rate is
0.041656 W/mm2
.
BERYLLIUM
1. Results
NODAL TEMPERATURE
Fig 2.36 Circular shaped Beryllium at Nodal Temperature with 3mm Thickness
Temperature is maximum inside the cylinder with value of 552.588K and decreasing to
outside with 541.763K and is still reducing on the fins.
THERMAL GRADIENT SUM
Fig 2.37 Circular shaped Beryllium with Thermal Gradient Vector Sum with 3mm Thickness
The change in temperature is in the maximum of 1.55349K/mm to 1.74711K/mm and
minimum of 0.198177K/mm
THERMAL FLUX SUM
Fig 2.38 Circular shaped Beryllium with Thermal Flux Vector Sum with 3mm Thickness
16. Comparison of Typing Speeds on Different Types of Keyboards and Factors Influencing It, Siddharth
Ghoshal, Gaurav Acharya, Journal Impact Factor (2015): 8.8293 Calculated by GISI
(www.jifactor.com)
www.iaeme.com/ijmet.asp 110 editor@iaeme.com
The maximum heat transfer rate is 0.377375 W/mm2
and minimum heat transfer rate is
0.042806 W/mm2
.
2.5mm Thickness
ALUMINUM ALLOY 204
NODAL TEMPERATURE
Fig 2.39 Circular shaped Aluminum Alloy 204 at Nodal Temperature with 2.5mm Thickness
The temperature is maximum inside the cylinder with value of 548.999K and decreasing to
outside with 530.997K and is still reducing on the fins.
THERMALGRADIENTSUM
Fig 2.40 Circular shaped Aluminum Alloy 204 with Thermal Gradient Vector Sum with 2.5mm
Thickness
The change in temperature is in the maximum of 2.983K/mm to 3.354K/mm and minimum of
0.381639K/mm
THERMAL FLUX SUM
Fig 2.41 Circular shaped Aluminum Alloy 204 with Thermal Flux Vector Sum with 2.5mm
Thickness
17. Comparison of Typing Speeds on Different Types of Keyboards and Factors Influencing It, Siddharth
Ghoshal, Gaurav Acharya, Journal Impact Factor (2015): 8.8293 Calculated by GISI
(www.jifactor.com)
www.iaeme.com/ijmet.asp 111 editor@iaeme.com
The maximum heat transfer rate is 0.40253 W/mm2
and minimum heat transfer rate is
0.045797 W/mm2
.
MAGNESIUM
NODAL TEMPERATURE
Fig 2.42 Circular shaped Magnesium at Nodal Temperature with 2.5mm Thickness
The temperature is maximum inside the cylinder with value of 550.732K and decreasing to
outside with 536.197K and is still reducing on the fins.
THERMAL GRADIENT SUM
Fig 2.43 Circular shaped Magnesium with Thermal Gradient Vector Sum with 2.5mm Thickness
The change in temperature is in the maximum of 2.368K/mm to 2.663K/mm and minimum of
0.304052K/mm
THERMAL FLUX SUM
Fig 2.44 Circular shaped Magnesium with Thermal Flux Vector Sum with 2.5mm Thickness
18. Comparison of Typing Speeds on Different Types of Keyboards and Factors Influencing It, Siddharth
Ghoshal, Gaurav Acharya, Journal Impact Factor (2015): 8.8293 Calculated by GISI
(www.jifactor.com)
www.iaeme.com/ijmet.asp 112 editor@iaeme.com
The maximum heat transfer rate is 0.423381 W/mm2
and minimum heat transfer rate is
0.048344 W/mm2
.
ALUMINUM ALLOY 7075
NODAL TEMPERATURE
Fig 2.45 Circular shaped Aluminum Alloy 7075 at Nodal Temperature with 2.5mm Thickness
The temperature is maximum inside the cylinder with value of 552.384K and decreasing to outside
with 541.151K and is still reducing on the fins.
THERMAL GRADIENT SUM
Fig 2.46 Circular shaped Aluminum Alloy 7075 with Thermal Gradient Vector Sum with 2.5mm
Thickness
The change in temperature is in the maximum of 1.92597K/mm to 2.16593K/mm and
minimum of 0.24544K/mm
THERMAL FLUX SUM
Fig 2.47 Circular shaped Aluminum Alloy 7075 with Thermal Flux Vector Sum with 2.5mm
Thickness
19. Comparison of Typing Speeds on Different Types of Keyboards and Factors Influencing It, Siddharth
Ghoshal, Gaurav Acharya, Journal Impact Factor (2015): 8.8293 Calculated by GISI
(www.jifactor.com)
www.iaeme.com/ijmet.asp 113 editor@iaeme.com
The maximum heat transfer rate is 0.467841 W/mm2
and minimum heat transfer rate is
0.053015 W/mm2
.
BERYLLIUM
NODAL TEMPERATURE
Fig 2.48 Circular shaped Beryllium at Nodal Temperature with 2.5mm Thickness
The temperature is maximum inside the cylinder with value of 551.262K and decreasing to
outside with 537.786K and is still reducing on the fins.
THERMAL GRADIENT SUM
Fig 2.49 Circular shaped Beryllium with Thermal Gradient Vector Sum with 2.5mm Thickness
The change in temperature is in the maximum of 2.33359K/mm to 2.62442K/mm and minimum of
0.297745K/mm
THERMAL FLUX SUM
Fig 2.50 Circular shaped Beryllium with Thermal Flux Vector Sum with 2.5mm Thickness
20. Comparison of Typing Speeds on Different Types of Keyboards and Factors Influencing It, Siddharth
Ghoshal, Gaurav Acharya, Journal Impact Factor (2015): 8.8293 Calculated by GISI
(www.jifactor.com)
www.iaeme.com/ijmet.asp 114 editor@iaeme.com
The maximum heat transfer rate is 0.454025 W/mm2
and minimum heat transfer rate is
0.05151 W/mm2
.
III RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS
Table 3.1 Results and Discussions
in Thickness Type Materials
Results
NODAL
TEMPERATURE
THERMAL
GRADIENT
HEAT FLUX
2.5mm
Curved Al 7075 558 21.7453 3.76193
Al 204 558 30.034 3.604
Beryllium 558 17.7891 3.84244
Magnesium 558 2.73671 0.435137
Circular Al 7075 558 2.16593 0.467841
Al 204 558 3.354 0.40253
Beryllium 558 2.62442 0.454025
Magnesium 558 2.663 0.423381
Rectangular Al 7075 558 182.998 23.0087
Al 204 558 170.122 20.4146
Beryllium 558 132.021 28.5166
Magnesium 558 140.767 22.3819
3mm
Curved Al 7075 558 2.39 0.413
Al 204 558 3.537 0.424496
Beryllium 558 1.96731 0.42278
Magnesium 558 2.763 0.439357
Circular Al 7075 558 2.12 0.366
Al 204 558 2.99 0.359345
Beryllium 558 1.74111 0.377375
Magnesium 558 2.3772 0.377
Rectangular Al 7075 558 70.7334 12.234
Al 204 558 91.6605 10.9993
Beryllium 558 59.747 12.9054
Magnesium 558 75.254 11.9634
3.2 GRAPHICAL REPRESENTATION
Thickness of 2.5 mm
1. Curved
Fig 3.1 Results of Thermal gradient and Heat Flux of all materials with Curve Shape and Thickness
of 2.5 mm
2. Circular
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
Heat Flux Thermal
Gradient
Al 7075
Al 204
Beryllium
Magnesium
21. Comparison of Typing Speeds on Different Types of Keyboards and Factors Influencing It, Siddharth
Ghoshal, Gaurav Acharya, Journal Impact Factor (2015): 8.8293 Calculated by GISI
(www.jifactor.com)
www.iaeme.com/ijmet.asp 115 editor@iaeme.com
Fig 3.2 Results of Thermal gradient and Heat Flux of all materials with Circular Shape and
Thickness of 2.5 mm
3. Rectangular
Fig 3.3 Results of Thermal gradient and Heat Flux of all materials with Rectangle Shape and
Thickness of 2.5 mm
By observing the graphs, the heat flux is more for Beryllium and Aluminum alloy 7075.
Thickness of 3 mm
1. Curved
Fig 3.4 Results of Thermal gradient and Heat Flux of all materials with Curve Shape and Thickness
of 3 mm
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
Heat Flux Thermal
Gradient
Al 7075
Al 204
Beryllium
Magnesium
0
50
100
150
200
Heat Flux Thermal
Gradient
Al 7075
Al 204
Beryllium
Magnesium
0
1
2
3
4
Heat Flux Thermal
Gradient
Al 7075
Al204
Beryllium
Magnesium
22. Comparison of Typing Speeds on Different Types of Keyboards and Factors Influencing It, Siddharth
Ghoshal, Gaurav Acharya, Journal Impact Factor (2015): 8.8293 Calculated by GISI
(www.jifactor.com)
www.iaeme.com/ijmet.asp 116 editor@iaeme.com
2. Circular
Fig 3.5 Results of Thermal gradient and Heat Flux of all materials with Circular Shape and
Thickness of 2.5 mm
3. Rectangular
Fig 3.6 Results of Thermal gradient and Heat Flux of all materials with Rectangle Shape and
Thickness of 2.5 mm
By observing the graphs, the heat flux is more for Beryllium and Aluminum alloy 7075.
Comparison of Thickness 2.5 mm and 3 mm
1 Curved
Thermal Gradient
Fig 3.7 Thermal Gradiant for Thickness 2.5 mm and 3 mm when curved
Thermal Flux
Fig 3.8 Thermal Flux for Thickness 2.5 mm and 3 mm when curved
By observing the graphs, the heat flux is more for 2.5mm
0
1
2
3
4
Heat Flux Thermal
Gradient
Al 7075
Al 204
Beryllium
magnesium
0
50
100
Heat Flux Thermal
Gradient
Al 7075
Al 204
Beryllium
Magnesium
0 20 40
2.5mm
3.0mm Magnesium
Beryllium
Al 204
Al 7075
0 5
2.5 mm
3.0 mm Magnesium
Beryllium
Al 204
Al 7075
23. Comparison of Typing Speeds on Different Types of Keyboards and Factors Influencing It, Siddharth
Ghoshal, Gaurav Acharya, Journal Impact Factor (2015): 8.8293 Calculated by GISI
(www.jifactor.com)
www.iaeme.com/ijmet.asp 117 editor@iaeme.com
2. Circular
Thermal Gradient
Fig 3.9 Thermal Gradiant for Thickness 2.5 mm and 3 mm when circle
Thermal Flux
Fig 3.10 Thermal Flux for Thickness 2.5 mm and 3 mm when circle
By observing the graphs, the heat flux is more for 2.5mm
Rectangular
Thermal Gradient
Fig 3.11 Thermal Gradiant for Thickness 2.5 mm and 3 mm when Rectangle
Thermal Flux
Fig 3.12 Thermal Flux for Thickness 2.5 mm and 3 mm when Rectangle
By observing the graphs, the heat flux is more for 2.5mm
0 2 4
2.5 mm
3.0 mm
Magnesiu
m
Beryllium
Al 204
0 0.2 0.4 0.6
2.5mm
3mm Magnesium
Beryllium
Al 204
Al 7075
0 100 200
2.5 mm
3.0 mm
Magnesium
Beryllium
Al 204
Al 7075
0 20 40
2.5 mm
3.0 mm
Magnesiu
m
Beryllium
Al 204
24. Comparison of Typing Speeds on Different Types of Keyboards and Factors Influencing It, Siddharth
Ghoshal, Gaurav Acharya, Journal Impact Factor (2015): 8.8293 Calculated by GISI
(www.jifactor.com)
www.iaeme.com/ijmet.asp 118 editor@iaeme.com
IV.CONCLUSION & FUTURE SCOPE
In this thesis, a cylinder fin body for a 150cc motorcycle is modeled using parametric
software Pro/Engineer. The original model is changed by changing the thickness of the fins. The
thickness of the original model is 3mm, it has been reduced to 2.5mm. By reducing the thickness of
the fins, the overall weight is reduced.
Present used material for fin body is Aluminum Alloy 204. In this thesis, three other
materials are considered which have more thermal conductivities than Aluminum Alloy 204. The
materials are Aluminum alloy 7075, Magnesium Alloy and Beryllium. Thermal analysis is done for
all the three materials. The material for the original model is changed by taking the consideration of
their densities and thermal conductivity.
By observing the thermal analysis results, thermal flux is more for Beryllium than other
materials and also by reducing the thickness of the fin 2.5mm, the heat transfer rate is increased.
The shape of the fin can be modified to improve the heat transfer rate and can be analyzed. The use
of Aluminum alloy 6061 as per the manufacturing aspect is to be considered. By changing the
thickness of the fin, the total manufacturing cost is extra to prepare the new component.
REFERENCES
1. Thermal Analysis of I C Engine cylinder fins array using CFD by Mr. Mehul S. Patel, Mr. N.M.Vora
2. Heat Transfer Simulation by CFD from Fins of an Air Cooled Motorcycle Engine under Varying
Climatic Conditions by Pulkit Agarwal, Mayur Shrikhande and P. Srinivasan
3. Experimental Study of Effect of Angle of Inclination of Fins on Natural Convection Heat Transfer
through Permeable Fins by U. V. Awasarmol and Dr. A. T. Pise
4. The effect of fin spacing and material on the performance of a heat sink with circular pin fins by A
Dewan, P Patro, I Khan,and P Mahanta
5. Nabemoto, A., Heat Transfer on a Fin of Fin Tube, Bulletin of the Faculty of Engineering, Hiroshima
University, (in Japanese), Vol.33, No.2 (1985), pp.127–136.
6. Gibson, A.H., The Air Cooling of Petrol Engines, Proceedings of the Institute of Automobile
Engineers, Vol.XIV (1920), pp.243–275.
7. Biermann, A.E. and Pinkel, B., Heat Transfer from Finned Metal Cylinders in an Air Stream, NACA
Report No.488 (1935).
8. Thornhill, D. and May, A., An Experimental Investigation into the Cooling of Finned Metal Cylinders,
in a
9. Free Air Stream, SAE Paper 1999-01-3307, (1999). ( 4 ) Thornhill, D., Graham, A., Cunnigham, G.,
Troxier, P. and Meyer, R.,
10. Experimental Investigation into the Free Air-Cooling of Air-Cooled Cylinders, SAE Paper 2003-32-
0034, (2003). ( 5 ) Pai, B.U., Samaga, B.S. and Mahadevan, K., Some
11. Experimental Studies of Heat Transfer from Finned Cylinders of Air-Cooled I.C. Engines, 4th National
Heat Mass Transfer Conference, (1977), pp.137–144.
12. (Nabemoto, A. and Chiba, T., Flow over Fin Surfaces of Fin Tubes, Bulletin of the Faculty of
Engineering, Hiroshima University, (in Japanese), Vol.33, No.2 (1985), pp.117–125.
13. Thermal Engineering by I. Shvets, M. Kondak
14. Thermal Engineering by Rudramoorthy
15. Thermal Engineering by R.K. Rajput
16. Thermal Engineering by Sarkar
17. Ali Salah Ameen and Dr. Ajeet Kumar Rai, “Analysis of Electronic Chips Microchannel by
Using Ansys Software” International Journal of Advanced Research in Engineering &
Technology (IJARET), Volume 5, Issue 7, 2014, pp. 47 - 56, ISSN Print: 0976-6480, ISSN
Online: 0976-6499.