Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP)
•Download as PPTX, PDF•
3 likes•1,674 views
The Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) is a decision-making tool that breaks down a complex problem into a hierarchical structure. It decomposes the overall goal into criteria and sub-criteria, and provides a scale from 1 to 9 to assess the relative importance of each element against others. Alternatives are evaluated against each criteria and weighted according to the importance of the criteria to arrive at an overall ranking for each alternative.
Report
Share
Report
Share
Recommended
Decision Making Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP); A Step by Step A...
Analytical Hierarchy Process is one of the most inclusive system which is considered to make decisions with multiple criteria because this method gives to formulate the problem as a hierarchical and believe a mixture of quantitative and qualitative criteria as well. This presentation summarizes the process of conducting Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP).
Analytic Hierarchy Process AHP
The document discusses the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), a multi-criteria decision analysis technique developed by Thomas Saaty. It can be used to help decision makers address complex decisions with multiple criteria. The AHP breaks down a decision into a hierarchy, with the overall goal at the top and criteria and alternatives below. Pairwise comparisons are used to assign weights to criteria and scores to alternatives to determine overall priority. The process involves structuring the problem, setting criteria priorities through pairwise comparisons, scoring alternatives on each criterion, and calculating overall scores to rank alternatives. It has been widely applied in fields like manufacturing, technology, and public policy decisions.
ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS (AHP)
Contractors play an important role in any construction project. Perhaps the most important decision is the selection of contractor by the employer prior to the implementation of the project. AHP is one of the main mathematical models currently available to support the decision theory, particularly for construction contractor prequalification.
Multi criteria decision making
This document discusses various multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) methods. It describes the objectives and steps in MCDM methodology. Three MCDM methods are explained in detail: Compromise Programming (CP), Preference Ranking Organisation METHod of Enrichment Evaluation (PROMETHEE), and the Weighted Average Method. An example is provided to illustrate the application of each method.
Weighted Score And Topsis
Experience Mazda Zoom Zoom Lifestyle and Culture by Visiting and joining the Official Mazda Community at http://www.MazdaCommunity.org for additional insight into the Zoom Zoom Lifestyle and special offers for Mazda Community Members. If you live in Arizona, check out CardinaleWay Mazda's eCommerce website at http://www.Cardinale-Way-Mazda.com
20060411 Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP)
The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) is a decision-making tool that breaks down complex decisions into a series of pairwise comparisons. It allows decision makers to incorporate both qualitative and quantitative factors. The AHP works by:
1) Computing weights for each decision criterion through pairwise comparisons.
2) Scoring alternatives based on each criterion.
3) Multiplying the weights and scores to obtain overall scores for each alternative.
4) Ranking the alternatives based on their overall scores. Consistency is also checked to ensure reliable results. An example is provided to illustrate the AHP process.
Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) to Select and Prioritize Project...
The objective of this paper is to present, discuss and apply the principles and techniques of the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) in the prioritization and selection of projects in a portfolio. AHP is one of the main mathematical models currently available to support the decision theory.
How to do ahp analysis in excel
This document provides instructions for how to perform Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) analysis in Excel. It discusses developing a hierarchy of decision criteria and alternatives, making pairwise comparisons between elements, normalizing the comparisons to generate weights, and checking consistency. The basic steps are outlined as developing pairwise comparison matrices, normalizing the matrices to obtain weights, and calculating a consistency ratio to validate the judgments.
Recommended
Decision Making Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP); A Step by Step A...
Analytical Hierarchy Process is one of the most inclusive system which is considered to make decisions with multiple criteria because this method gives to formulate the problem as a hierarchical and believe a mixture of quantitative and qualitative criteria as well. This presentation summarizes the process of conducting Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP).
Analytic Hierarchy Process AHP
The document discusses the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), a multi-criteria decision analysis technique developed by Thomas Saaty. It can be used to help decision makers address complex decisions with multiple criteria. The AHP breaks down a decision into a hierarchy, with the overall goal at the top and criteria and alternatives below. Pairwise comparisons are used to assign weights to criteria and scores to alternatives to determine overall priority. The process involves structuring the problem, setting criteria priorities through pairwise comparisons, scoring alternatives on each criterion, and calculating overall scores to rank alternatives. It has been widely applied in fields like manufacturing, technology, and public policy decisions.
ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS (AHP)
Contractors play an important role in any construction project. Perhaps the most important decision is the selection of contractor by the employer prior to the implementation of the project. AHP is one of the main mathematical models currently available to support the decision theory, particularly for construction contractor prequalification.
Multi criteria decision making
This document discusses various multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) methods. It describes the objectives and steps in MCDM methodology. Three MCDM methods are explained in detail: Compromise Programming (CP), Preference Ranking Organisation METHod of Enrichment Evaluation (PROMETHEE), and the Weighted Average Method. An example is provided to illustrate the application of each method.
Weighted Score And Topsis
Experience Mazda Zoom Zoom Lifestyle and Culture by Visiting and joining the Official Mazda Community at http://www.MazdaCommunity.org for additional insight into the Zoom Zoom Lifestyle and special offers for Mazda Community Members. If you live in Arizona, check out CardinaleWay Mazda's eCommerce website at http://www.Cardinale-Way-Mazda.com
20060411 Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP)
The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) is a decision-making tool that breaks down complex decisions into a series of pairwise comparisons. It allows decision makers to incorporate both qualitative and quantitative factors. The AHP works by:
1) Computing weights for each decision criterion through pairwise comparisons.
2) Scoring alternatives based on each criterion.
3) Multiplying the weights and scores to obtain overall scores for each alternative.
4) Ranking the alternatives based on their overall scores. Consistency is also checked to ensure reliable results. An example is provided to illustrate the AHP process.
Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) to Select and Prioritize Project...
The objective of this paper is to present, discuss and apply the principles and techniques of the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) in the prioritization and selection of projects in a portfolio. AHP is one of the main mathematical models currently available to support the decision theory.
How to do ahp analysis in excel
This document provides instructions for how to perform Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) analysis in Excel. It discusses developing a hierarchy of decision criteria and alternatives, making pairwise comparisons between elements, normalizing the comparisons to generate weights, and checking consistency. The basic steps are outlined as developing pairwise comparison matrices, normalizing the matrices to obtain weights, and calculating a consistency ratio to validate the judgments.
multi criteria decision making
selection of the best refrigerator model by the application of MCDM methodologies i.e. AHP and TOPSIS
AHP fundamentals
This document discusses the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), a multi-criteria decision making technique. AHP allows decisions to be made by structuring multiple criteria into a hierarchy. It involves pairwise comparisons of criteria and alternatives to obtain their relative priorities. Judgments are made using a fundamental scale and priorities are derived from the principal eigenvector of the comparison matrix. Consistency of judgments is ensured by calculating a consistency ratio. The AHP provides a systematic process to integrate both subjective and objective evaluations to help decision makers select the best alternative.
Analytic Network Process
The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Analytic Network Process (ANP) are techniques for multi-criteria decision making. AHP structures decisions as a hierarchy, while ANP structures them as a network to account for interdependencies. Both use pairwise comparisons to measure weights and rank alternatives. The four major steps of ANP are: 1) model construction, 2) pairwise comparison matrices to derive local priorities, 3) supermatrix formation to obtain global priorities, and 4) selection of the best alternative based on overall priorities. The document then provides an example case study of applying ANP to analyze strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats for an insurance company in Iran.
Multi-Criteria Decision Making.pdf
Introduction to Decision Making
MULTI CRITERIA DECISION MAKING
STEPS IN A TYPICAL MCDM PROCESS
Popularity of Different MCDM Methods
Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS)
Ahp
The document discusses the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP), a decision-making tool used to prioritize alternatives and build an additive value function. AHP attempts to mirror the human decision process by structuring decisions into a hierarchy and using pairwise comparisons. It allows for multiple decision makers and can provide weights for criteria, though inconsistencies may arise and it is controversial due to issues like rank reversal. The document outlines the AHP procedure and discusses measuring and addressing consistency in pairwise comparisons.
MCDM Introduction 08-01
This document defines key concepts in multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) including criteria, alternatives, and decisions. It provides examples of single-criterion and multiple-criteria decision problems. For multiple-criteria problems, alternatives differ in more than one criterion and criteria are often competing. Formal MCDM analysis is useful when criteria are competing and trade-offs are difficult to evaluate. The document discusses types of MCDM problems and contexts for MCDM including mutually exclusive alternatives, portfolio selection, design, and measurement.
Analytic hierarchy process
The document describes the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), which is a structured technique for organizing and analyzing complex decisions. AHP involves constructing a hierarchy of criteria and alternatives, then making pairwise comparisons between elements to determine their relative importance. These comparisons are used to calculate weights for criteria and priorities for alternatives. The document provides an example of using AHP to select a car based on style, reliability, and fuel economy criteria. It also outlines the steps to determine criteria weights, alternative priorities, and consistency ratios in AHP.
Analytic hierarchy process (AHP)
Project describes the use of Analytic hierarchy process (AHP) by taking bollywood songs of different era and finding the best song out of the listed options based on different parameters.
Apply AHP in decision making
The document provides an overview of the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), a decision-making tool developed by Thomas Saaty in the 1970s. It discusses the background, development, methodology, applications, advantages, and disadvantages of AHP. Examples of organizations that use AHP for decision making are also given, along with a case study on how AHP was used to evaluate candidates for an entrepreneur award in Terengganu, Malaysia.
Ahp and anp
The document describes the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Analytic Network Process (ANP) methods for multi-criteria decision making. AHP involves structuring decision problems in a hierarchical manner with a goal, criteria, and alternatives, then making pairwise comparisons to determine priority weights. ANP allows for interdependent relationships between decision elements, which are structured as clusters rather than hierarchical levels. Both methods are used to incorporate both tangible and intangible factors into complex decisions by establishing relative priorities through pairwise comparisons.
Multi criteria decision making
The document discusses multiple criteria decision making (MCDM) approaches. It introduces several common MCDM methods: the weighted score method, TOPSIS (Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution) method, and Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). It then provides a detailed example of how to apply the weighted score method and TOPSIS method to a problem of selecting the best car based on criteria like style, reliability, fuel economy, and cost.
ELECTRE Decision Making Method
An introduction to ELECTRE Decision Making Method. This is an outranking method where options outranked each other such that the best option remains.Here both concordance and discordance index was used to find the outranking criteria.
TOPSIS - A multi-criteria decision making approach
This document discusses the TOPSIS (Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution) method for multi-criteria decision making (MCDM). It defines key terms like alternatives, criteria, weights, and decision matrices. It then outlines the steps in the TOPSIS method, which include standardizing the decision matrix, determining the ideal and negative ideal solutions, calculating the separation from each alternative to the ideal and negative ideal solutions, and selecting the alternative with the shortest distance from the ideal and farthest from the negative ideal solution.
Training on Multi-Criteria Decision-Making methods.pptx
The document outlines training on multiple criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods. It discusses what MCDM is and provides a classification of MCDM methods. The training will cover several specific MCDM techniques: CRITERIA, ENTROPY, TOPSIS, CODAS, CoCoSo, and EDAS. It provides high-level descriptions of the CRITERIA and ENTROPY methods.
AHP-ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS- How To Slove AHP in Excel
This project is all about about sloving the AHP problem in excel, and how to come up with result , how to rank a certain creteria.
MCDM PPT.pptx
Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) techniques can be used to evaluate alternatives based on multiple conflicting criteria. The document discusses various MCDM techniques including weighted score method, TOPSIS, and Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). Case studies are presented to demonstrate how to apply these techniques to select optimal construction materials and technologies by considering criteria such as strength, durability, cost, and environmental impact.
Ahp calculations
The document describes the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), a technique for structuring complex decisions. It involves breaking the decision down into a hierarchy, then using pairwise comparisons to determine the relative importance of criteria and alternatives. The example provided illustrates Judy Grim using AHP to choose a new computer system. She identifies hardware, software, and vendor support as criteria. Alternatives are three computer systems. Pairwise comparisons assign weights to criteria and ratings to alternatives on each criterion. The highest rated alternative is selected.
Stryker: Decision Making Process
Overview of the importance of the decision making process for organizations. Information on Stryker-Consulting, new program adapted for decision making process.
Coordinate geometry fundamentals 2012
This document provides information and instructions for performing coordinate geometry computations for surveying traverse loops. It defines key terms like azimuths, bearings, angles, and directions. It explains how to compute interior angles, azimuths, latitudes, and departures for traverse legs. It also describes how to balance a traverse loop by adjusting angles and applying corrections to latitudes and departures to minimize positional errors.
surveying 1 pdf
The document provides information on chain surveying, including:
1) It defines chain surveying and its objectives, which include measuring distances and establishing land boundaries.
2) It describes the various equipment used in chain surveying such as chains, tapes, pegs, arrows, ranging rods, and cross staffs.
3) It explains the different operations involved in chain surveying such as ranging, which can be direct or indirect, and using a line ranger or cross staff to measure perpendicular offsets.
Analytic hierarchy process
The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) is a technique for analyzing complex decisions using mathematics and psychology. It involves pairwise comparisons of decision factors on a scale to determine their relative importance. As an example, AHP is used to determine the priority weights of cost, brand, and features for a customer choosing a smartphone. Based on the customer's pairwise comparisons, cost is found to be the most important factor at 55.8%, followed by features at 28.3% and brand at 15.9%. AHP can similarly be applied to determine the priority of factors for any complex decision making problem.
More Related Content
What's hot
multi criteria decision making
selection of the best refrigerator model by the application of MCDM methodologies i.e. AHP and TOPSIS
AHP fundamentals
This document discusses the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), a multi-criteria decision making technique. AHP allows decisions to be made by structuring multiple criteria into a hierarchy. It involves pairwise comparisons of criteria and alternatives to obtain their relative priorities. Judgments are made using a fundamental scale and priorities are derived from the principal eigenvector of the comparison matrix. Consistency of judgments is ensured by calculating a consistency ratio. The AHP provides a systematic process to integrate both subjective and objective evaluations to help decision makers select the best alternative.
Analytic Network Process
The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Analytic Network Process (ANP) are techniques for multi-criteria decision making. AHP structures decisions as a hierarchy, while ANP structures them as a network to account for interdependencies. Both use pairwise comparisons to measure weights and rank alternatives. The four major steps of ANP are: 1) model construction, 2) pairwise comparison matrices to derive local priorities, 3) supermatrix formation to obtain global priorities, and 4) selection of the best alternative based on overall priorities. The document then provides an example case study of applying ANP to analyze strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats for an insurance company in Iran.
Multi-Criteria Decision Making.pdf
Introduction to Decision Making
MULTI CRITERIA DECISION MAKING
STEPS IN A TYPICAL MCDM PROCESS
Popularity of Different MCDM Methods
Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS)
Ahp
The document discusses the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP), a decision-making tool used to prioritize alternatives and build an additive value function. AHP attempts to mirror the human decision process by structuring decisions into a hierarchy and using pairwise comparisons. It allows for multiple decision makers and can provide weights for criteria, though inconsistencies may arise and it is controversial due to issues like rank reversal. The document outlines the AHP procedure and discusses measuring and addressing consistency in pairwise comparisons.
MCDM Introduction 08-01
This document defines key concepts in multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) including criteria, alternatives, and decisions. It provides examples of single-criterion and multiple-criteria decision problems. For multiple-criteria problems, alternatives differ in more than one criterion and criteria are often competing. Formal MCDM analysis is useful when criteria are competing and trade-offs are difficult to evaluate. The document discusses types of MCDM problems and contexts for MCDM including mutually exclusive alternatives, portfolio selection, design, and measurement.
Analytic hierarchy process
The document describes the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), which is a structured technique for organizing and analyzing complex decisions. AHP involves constructing a hierarchy of criteria and alternatives, then making pairwise comparisons between elements to determine their relative importance. These comparisons are used to calculate weights for criteria and priorities for alternatives. The document provides an example of using AHP to select a car based on style, reliability, and fuel economy criteria. It also outlines the steps to determine criteria weights, alternative priorities, and consistency ratios in AHP.
Analytic hierarchy process (AHP)
Project describes the use of Analytic hierarchy process (AHP) by taking bollywood songs of different era and finding the best song out of the listed options based on different parameters.
Apply AHP in decision making
The document provides an overview of the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), a decision-making tool developed by Thomas Saaty in the 1970s. It discusses the background, development, methodology, applications, advantages, and disadvantages of AHP. Examples of organizations that use AHP for decision making are also given, along with a case study on how AHP was used to evaluate candidates for an entrepreneur award in Terengganu, Malaysia.
Ahp and anp
The document describes the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Analytic Network Process (ANP) methods for multi-criteria decision making. AHP involves structuring decision problems in a hierarchical manner with a goal, criteria, and alternatives, then making pairwise comparisons to determine priority weights. ANP allows for interdependent relationships between decision elements, which are structured as clusters rather than hierarchical levels. Both methods are used to incorporate both tangible and intangible factors into complex decisions by establishing relative priorities through pairwise comparisons.
Multi criteria decision making
The document discusses multiple criteria decision making (MCDM) approaches. It introduces several common MCDM methods: the weighted score method, TOPSIS (Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution) method, and Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). It then provides a detailed example of how to apply the weighted score method and TOPSIS method to a problem of selecting the best car based on criteria like style, reliability, fuel economy, and cost.
ELECTRE Decision Making Method
An introduction to ELECTRE Decision Making Method. This is an outranking method where options outranked each other such that the best option remains.Here both concordance and discordance index was used to find the outranking criteria.
TOPSIS - A multi-criteria decision making approach
This document discusses the TOPSIS (Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution) method for multi-criteria decision making (MCDM). It defines key terms like alternatives, criteria, weights, and decision matrices. It then outlines the steps in the TOPSIS method, which include standardizing the decision matrix, determining the ideal and negative ideal solutions, calculating the separation from each alternative to the ideal and negative ideal solutions, and selecting the alternative with the shortest distance from the ideal and farthest from the negative ideal solution.
Training on Multi-Criteria Decision-Making methods.pptx
The document outlines training on multiple criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods. It discusses what MCDM is and provides a classification of MCDM methods. The training will cover several specific MCDM techniques: CRITERIA, ENTROPY, TOPSIS, CODAS, CoCoSo, and EDAS. It provides high-level descriptions of the CRITERIA and ENTROPY methods.
AHP-ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS- How To Slove AHP in Excel
This project is all about about sloving the AHP problem in excel, and how to come up with result , how to rank a certain creteria.
MCDM PPT.pptx
Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) techniques can be used to evaluate alternatives based on multiple conflicting criteria. The document discusses various MCDM techniques including weighted score method, TOPSIS, and Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). Case studies are presented to demonstrate how to apply these techniques to select optimal construction materials and technologies by considering criteria such as strength, durability, cost, and environmental impact.
Ahp calculations
The document describes the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), a technique for structuring complex decisions. It involves breaking the decision down into a hierarchy, then using pairwise comparisons to determine the relative importance of criteria and alternatives. The example provided illustrates Judy Grim using AHP to choose a new computer system. She identifies hardware, software, and vendor support as criteria. Alternatives are three computer systems. Pairwise comparisons assign weights to criteria and ratings to alternatives on each criterion. The highest rated alternative is selected.
Stryker: Decision Making Process
Overview of the importance of the decision making process for organizations. Information on Stryker-Consulting, new program adapted for decision making process.
Coordinate geometry fundamentals 2012
This document provides information and instructions for performing coordinate geometry computations for surveying traverse loops. It defines key terms like azimuths, bearings, angles, and directions. It explains how to compute interior angles, azimuths, latitudes, and departures for traverse legs. It also describes how to balance a traverse loop by adjusting angles and applying corrections to latitudes and departures to minimize positional errors.
surveying 1 pdf
The document provides information on chain surveying, including:
1) It defines chain surveying and its objectives, which include measuring distances and establishing land boundaries.
2) It describes the various equipment used in chain surveying such as chains, tapes, pegs, arrows, ranging rods, and cross staffs.
3) It explains the different operations involved in chain surveying such as ranging, which can be direct or indirect, and using a line ranger or cross staff to measure perpendicular offsets.
What's hot (20)
TOPSIS - A multi-criteria decision making approach
TOPSIS - A multi-criteria decision making approach
Training on Multi-Criteria Decision-Making methods.pptx
Training on Multi-Criteria Decision-Making methods.pptx
AHP-ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS- How To Slove AHP in Excel
AHP-ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS- How To Slove AHP in Excel
Viewers also liked
Analytic hierarchy process
The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) is a technique for analyzing complex decisions using mathematics and psychology. It involves pairwise comparisons of decision factors on a scale to determine their relative importance. As an example, AHP is used to determine the priority weights of cost, brand, and features for a customer choosing a smartphone. Based on the customer's pairwise comparisons, cost is found to be the most important factor at 55.8%, followed by features at 28.3% and brand at 15.9%. AHP can similarly be applied to determine the priority of factors for any complex decision making problem.
Kuliah SPK: Metode AHP (Analytical Hierarchy Process)
Dokumen tersebut membahas tentang metode Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) yang digunakan untuk membantu seseorang bernama Si Budi memilih pantai mana yang akan dikunjunginya di sekitar Kendari. AHP digunakan dengan menetapkan kriteria keindahan, keamanan, fasilitas, dan biaya, serta alternatif pantai Toronipa, Batu Gong, dan Nambo. Perhitungan vektor prioritas dilakukan untuk setiap kriteria dan alternatif, serta
Project risk management ahp
The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) is a multi-criteria decision making method developed by Saaty in 1980. AHP breaks down decisions into a hierarchy of criteria and alternatives, assigns weights to criteria based on pairwise comparisons, and synthesizes weights to rank alternatives. Consistency is ensured through a consistency ratio below 10%. The document provides an example of using AHP to rank car alternatives based on style, reliability, and fuel economy criteria. Mazda 3 receives the highest overall priority based on the weights and ratings.
Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP)
This document discusses different methods for prioritizing software requirements, including the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP). It provides background on AHP, explaining that it involves pairwise comparisons of requirements to determine their relative importance. The document also discusses motivations for generating different patterns for the pairwise comparison matrix in AHP to help determine if the assigned priorities are correct. It provides details on some other prioritization techniques like the Numerical Assignment Technique and Value Oriented Prioritization before focusing more on explaining AHP and why it is useful for prioritizing requirements when there are multiple stakeholders with different views.
AHP Practice Educator Training Glasgow January 2014
This presentation is both for AHPs who have never supervised a student and experienced AHPs who feel they need update training.
At the end of this training event you will be able to:
Appraise the role and attributes of the practice educator and student, within a multidisciplinary environment;
Evaluate theories, appropriate to adult and professional learners;
Plan, implement and facilitate learning within the practice setting;
Apply sound principles and judgement in the assessment of student performance;
Evaluate and reflect upon the learning experience.
Hogyan méretezzünk tűzfalat?
Miholics László előadása melyből kiderül: milyen szempontokat vegyünk figyelembe a nekünk szükséges tűzfal kiválasztásakor.
Analytical Hierarchy Process applied to maintenance strategy selection for of...
The aim of this research was to integrate the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP), to select the most appropriate maintenance strategy for a challenging environment faced by offshore platforms. Whilst providing new insight into the capability of the AHP methodology. This aim has been accomplished utilizing interview response from shell Maintenance and Inspection supervisors and two case studies based on: Petronas and Analysis of the failure of an offshore compressor crankshaft.
As a result from this research, the maintenance strategy based on information obtained was produced using the AHP multi criteria decision weighing methodology as implemented on a compressor in a corrosive environment.
Eng12
The dotcom bubble occurred from 1999-2000 as many internet-related startups received large investments and saw their stock prices rise rapidly. However, the bubble burst in December 2000 as many of these companies failed or went bankrupt, resulting in over half a million layoffs in the tech industry by 2002 and pushing the US economy into recession. While the bubble impacted many countries, Ireland suffered the most severe effects due to its reliance on tech investments during this period. Within the US, California saw the heaviest investment activity and job losses as the center of the dotcom boom and bust.
The dot com bubble in california
The document discusses the DotCom bubble that occurred in California in the late 1990s. Many internet-related companies were established during this time as e-commerce became more viable. This led to a surge of investment in internet and technology companies. However, the bubble eventually collapsed in the early 2000s, with many companies declaring bankruptcy. While some companies like Google, eBay and Amazon survived, the collapse had significant economic impacts and led to high unemployment in the tech sector for several years.
16
This document provides an overview of various sheet metal forming processes. It begins with an introduction to shearing, which involves applying shear stress between a punch and die to cut sheet metal. Key shearing operations like punching, blanking, and progressive dies are described. Other forming methods discussed include bending, deep drawing, stretch forming, spinning, explosive forming, and super plastic forming. Process parameters, equipment, advantages, limitations, and examples of parts made for each technique are summarized. The document provides a comprehensive reference on the different ways sheet metal can be shaped and fabricated.
Viewers also liked (14)
Kuliah SPK: Metode AHP (Analytical Hierarchy Process)
Kuliah SPK: Metode AHP (Analytical Hierarchy Process)
AHP Practice Educator Training Glasgow January 2014
AHP Practice Educator Training Glasgow January 2014
Analytical Hierarchy Process applied to maintenance strategy selection for of...
Analytical Hierarchy Process applied to maintenance strategy selection for of...
Similar to Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP)
T21 conjoint analysis
Conjoint analysis is a technique that allows researchers to determine the relative importance of different product features and attributes based on consumer preferences. It works by varying product features across many concepts that respondents then rate or rank. The ratings are analyzed to determine the utility or value each feature provides individually. Key steps include identifying important attributes, determining attribute levels, designing profiles for respondents to evaluate, then analyzing the data to understand feature importance. The technique provides more actionable insights than direct questions about preferences.
Student Affairs Assessment Committee Training Part 2
The document outlines a training agenda for assessment fellows that includes a review of foundational statistical concepts such as univariate, bivariate, and multivariate models. It discusses how to use descriptive statistics, correlations, regression, and factor analysis to increase understanding of variables and their relationships through increasingly complex models. The training aims to help fellows better predict, control for, and understand variables in assessment through applying these foundational statistical techniques and concepts.
motivation model
This document discusses different theories of motivation. It begins by defining motivation as the set of forces that cause certain behaviors and explains that managers aim to maximize desired behaviors. It then discusses determinants of individual performance including motivation, ability, and work environment.
The document goes on to explain content and process perspectives on motivation. Content perspectives examine what workplace factors motivate people, discussing theories like Maslow's hierarchy of needs and Herzberg's two-factor theory. Process perspectives focus on how people choose behaviors to satisfy needs and evaluate satisfaction, covering expectancy theory, equity theory, and goal-setting theory.
The document delves into Vroom's expectancy theory, explaining that motivation depends on desire and likelihood of outcomes. It outlines
Lecture 6 measurement i
1) The document discusses the different levels of measurement for variables, including nominal, ordinal, interval, and ratio.
2) Nominal variables are discrete categories while ordinal variables are discrete and hierarchical. Interval variables are discrete, hierarchical and equidistant.
3) Examples of different levels of measurement include gender as nominal, answers on a 7 point scale as ordinal, standardized scores as interval, and smoking frequency as ratio.
Research tool.rating scale
Rating scales are techniques used to categorize objects, events, or people on a continuum represented by a series of numbers. There are several types of rating scales including numerical, graphical, percentage, standard, and forced choice scales. Important considerations in developing a valid and reliable rating scale include clearly defining the traits being measured, determining inter-rater reliability, and ensuring ratings are not biased by desirable or undesirable traits.
R - what do the numbers mean? #RStats
R - what do the numbers mean? #RStats This is the presentation for my Demo at Orlando Live60 AILIve. We go through statistics interpretation with examples
Internal equity
Internal equity refers to the fairness of an organization's pay structure. It can be established through job evaluation, which determines a job's worth to the employer, or competency analysis, which evaluates an individual's skills and abilities. Job evaluation methods include ranking jobs, classification systems, and point factor analysis. Alternatively, pay can be based on external market pricing. Maintaining internal equity ensures fair treatment and motivates performance.
Inferential Statistics
This document provides an overview of inferential statistics and statistical tests that can be used, including correlation tests, t-tests, and how to determine which tests are appropriate. It discusses the assumptions of parametric tests like Pearson's correlation and t-tests, and how to check assumptions graphically and using statistical tests. Specific procedures for conducting correlation analyses in Excel and SPSS are outlined, along with how to interpret and report the results.
Measuring scaling new.pptx
This document discusses key concepts in measurement and scaling, including different types of scales and scaling techniques. It defines measurement as assigning numbers or symbols to characteristics according to rules. Scales are quantifying measures that arrange items progressively by value. There are four primary scales of measurement: nominal, ordinal, interval, and ratio scales. Scaling techniques can be comparative, involving direct comparisons, or noncomparative where objects are scaled independently. Examples of scaling techniques provided include paired comparisons, rank ordering, constant sum, rating scales like Likert and semantic differential, and graphic rating scales. The document also discusses evaluating scales based on reliability, which measures consistency, and validity, which measures accuracy. Reliability is a prerequisite for validity.
Similar to Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) (9)
Student Affairs Assessment Committee Training Part 2
Student Affairs Assessment Committee Training Part 2
Recently uploaded
How are Lilac French Bulldogs Beauty Charming the World and Capturing Hearts....
“After being the most listed dog breed in the United States for 31
years in a row, the Labrador Retriever has dropped to second place
in the American Kennel Club's annual survey of the country's most
popular canines. The French Bulldog is the new top dog in the
United States as of 2022. The stylish puppy has ascended the
rankings in rapid time despite having health concerns and limited
color choices.”
Call 8867766396 Satta Matka Dpboss Matka Guessing Satta batta Matka 420 Satta...
CALL 8867766396 SATTA MATKA | DPBOSS | KALYAN MAIN BAZAR | FAST MATKA | DPBOSS GUESSING | TARA MATKA | KALYAN CHART | MATKA BOSS
Dpboss Matka Guessing Satta Matta Matka Kalyan Chart Satta Matka
Dpboss Matka Guessing Satta Matta Matka Kalyan Chart Satta Matka➒➌➎➏➑➐➋➑➐➐Dpboss Matka Guessing Satta Matka Kalyan Chart Indian Matka
Dpboss Matka Guessing Satta Matta Matka Kalyan Chart Indian Matka Indian satta Matka Dpboss Matka Kalyan Chart Matka Boss otg matka Guessing Satta Top mailing list providers in the USA.pptx
Discover the top mailing list providers in the USA, offering targeted lists, segmentation, and analytics to optimize your marketing campaigns and drive engagement.
The Heart of Leadership_ How Emotional Intelligence Drives Business Success B...
Leaders who possess self-awareness deeply understand their emotions, strengths, and weaknesses.
3 Simple Steps To Buy Verified Payoneer Account In 2024
Buy Verified Payoneer Account: Quick and Secure Way to Receive Payments
Buy Verified Payoneer Account With 100% secure documents, [ USA, UK, CA ]. Are you looking for a reliable and safe way to receive payments online? Then you need buy verified Payoneer account ! Payoneer is a global payment platform that allows businesses and individuals to send and receive money in over 200 countries.
If You Want To More Information just Contact Now:
Skype: SEOSMMEARTH
Telegram: @seosmmearth
Gmail: seosmmearth@gmail.com
Event Report - SAP Sapphire 2024 Orlando - lots of innovation and old challenges
Holger Mueller of Constellation Research shares his key takeaways from SAP's Sapphire confernece, held in Orlando, June 3rd till 5th 2024, in the Orange Convention Center.
Creative Web Design Company in Singapore
At Techbox Square, in Singapore, we're not just creative web designers and developers, we're the driving force behind your brand identity. Contact us today.
❼❷⓿❺❻❷❽❷❼❽ Dpboss Matka Result Satta Matka Guessing Satta Fix jodi Kalyan Fin...
❼❷⓿❺❻❷❽❷❼❽ Dpboss Matka Result Satta Matka Guessing Satta Fix jodi Kalyan Fin...❼❷⓿❺❻❷❽❷❼❽ Dpboss Kalyan Satta Matka Guessing Matka Result Main Bazar chart
❼❷⓿❺❻❷❽❷❼❽ Dpboss Matka Result Satta Matka Guessing Satta Fix jodi Kalyan Final ank Satta Matka Dpbos Final ank Satta Matta Matka 143 Kalyan Matka Guessing Final Matka Final ank Today Matka 420 Satta Batta Satta 143 Kalyan Chart Main Bazar Chart vip Matka Guessing Dpboss 143 Guessing Kalyan night Innovation Management Frameworks: Your Guide to Creativity & Innovation
Innovation Management Frameworks: Your Guide to Creativity & InnovationOperational Excellence Consulting
[To download this presentation, visit:
https://www.oeconsulting.com.sg/training-presentations]
This PowerPoint compilation offers a comprehensive overview of 20 leading innovation management frameworks and methodologies, selected for their broad applicability across various industries and organizational contexts. These frameworks are valuable resources for a wide range of users, including business professionals, educators, and consultants.
Each framework is presented with visually engaging diagrams and templates, ensuring the content is both informative and appealing. While this compilation is thorough, please note that the slides are intended as supplementary resources and may not be sufficient for standalone instructional purposes.
This compilation is ideal for anyone looking to enhance their understanding of innovation management and drive meaningful change within their organization. Whether you aim to improve product development processes, enhance customer experiences, or drive digital transformation, these frameworks offer valuable insights and tools to help you achieve your goals.
INCLUDED FRAMEWORKS/MODELS:
1. Stanford’s Design Thinking
2. IDEO’s Human-Centered Design
3. Strategyzer’s Business Model Innovation
4. Lean Startup Methodology
5. Agile Innovation Framework
6. Doblin’s Ten Types of Innovation
7. McKinsey’s Three Horizons of Growth
8. Customer Journey Map
9. Christensen’s Disruptive Innovation Theory
10. Blue Ocean Strategy
11. Strategyn’s Jobs-To-Be-Done (JTBD) Framework with Job Map
12. Design Sprint Framework
13. The Double Diamond
14. Lean Six Sigma DMAIC
15. TRIZ Problem-Solving Framework
16. Edward de Bono’s Six Thinking Hats
17. Stage-Gate Model
18. Toyota’s Six Steps of Kaizen
19. Microsoft’s Digital Transformation Framework
20. Design for Six Sigma (DFSS)
To download this presentation, visit:
https://www.oeconsulting.com.sg/training-presentationsCompany Valuation webinar series - Tuesday, 4 June 2024
This session provided an update as to the latest valuation data in the UK and then delved into a discussion on the upcoming election and the impacts on valuation. We finished, as always with a Q&A
Creative Web Design Company in Singapore
At Techbox Square, in Singapore, we're not just creative web designers and developers, we're the driving force behind your brand identity. Contact us today.
2022 Vintage Roman Numerals Men Rings
Discover timeless style with the 2022 Vintage Roman Numerals Men's Ring. Crafted from premium stainless steel, this 6mm wide ring embodies elegance and durability. Perfect as a gift, it seamlessly blends classic Roman numeral detailing with modern sophistication, making it an ideal accessory for any occasion.
https://rb.gy/usj1a2
Organizational Change Leadership Agile Tour Geneve 2024
Organizational Change Leadership at Agile Tour Geneve 2024
2024-6-01-IMPACTSilver-Corp-Presentation.pdf
IMPACT Silver is a pure silver zinc producer with over $260 million in revenue since 2008 and a large 100% owned 210km Mexico land package - 2024 catalysts includes new 14% grade zinc Plomosas mine and 20,000m of fully funded exploration drilling.
Recently uploaded (20)
How are Lilac French Bulldogs Beauty Charming the World and Capturing Hearts....
How are Lilac French Bulldogs Beauty Charming the World and Capturing Hearts....
Call 8867766396 Satta Matka Dpboss Matka Guessing Satta batta Matka 420 Satta...
Call 8867766396 Satta Matka Dpboss Matka Guessing Satta batta Matka 420 Satta...
Dpboss Matka Guessing Satta Matta Matka Kalyan Chart Satta Matka
Dpboss Matka Guessing Satta Matta Matka Kalyan Chart Satta Matka
The Heart of Leadership_ How Emotional Intelligence Drives Business Success B...
The Heart of Leadership_ How Emotional Intelligence Drives Business Success B...
3 Simple Steps To Buy Verified Payoneer Account In 2024
3 Simple Steps To Buy Verified Payoneer Account In 2024
Event Report - SAP Sapphire 2024 Orlando - lots of innovation and old challenges
Event Report - SAP Sapphire 2024 Orlando - lots of innovation and old challenges
❼❷⓿❺❻❷❽❷❼❽ Dpboss Matka Result Satta Matka Guessing Satta Fix jodi Kalyan Fin...
❼❷⓿❺❻❷❽❷❼❽ Dpboss Matka Result Satta Matka Guessing Satta Fix jodi Kalyan Fin...
Innovation Management Frameworks: Your Guide to Creativity & Innovation
Innovation Management Frameworks: Your Guide to Creativity & Innovation
Company Valuation webinar series - Tuesday, 4 June 2024
Company Valuation webinar series - Tuesday, 4 June 2024
Organizational Change Leadership Agile Tour Geneve 2024
Organizational Change Leadership Agile Tour Geneve 2024
Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP)
- 1. Analytical Hierarchy Process Rajiv Kumar
- 2. Or does this happen
- 6. • • Very similar to hierarchical value structure • – Goal on top (Fundamental Objective) • – Decompose into sub-goals (Means objectives) • – Further decomposition as necessary • – Identify criteria (attributes) to measure achievement of goals (attributes and objectives) • • Alternatives added to bottom • – Different from decision tree • – Alternatives show up in decision nodes • – Alternatives affected by uncertain events • – Alternatives connected to all criteria
- 15. 1 -9 Scale Intensity of Importance Definition 1 Equal Importance 3 Moderate Importance 5 Strong Importance 7 Very Strong Importance 9 Extreme Importance 2, 4, 6, 8 For compromises between the above Reciprocals of above In comparing elements i and j - if i is 3 compared to j - then j is 1/3 compared to i Rationals Force consistency Measured values available
- 31. "Never tell people how to do things. Tell them what to do and they will surprise you with their ingenuity."