This document announces a virtual capacity development workshop on integrating and implementing water-related Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) in Eastern Partnership countries and beyond. The workshop will be held over two half-days and aims to help Eastern Partnership countries develop their capacity in establishing monitoring frameworks for SDG indicators, integrating them into policy, and effectively using finance for water-related SDGs. It will feature presentations on progress implementing SDGs globally and lessons learned, as well as sessions for countries to share experiences nationalizing SDGs, integrating them into policy documents, mobilizing finance, and using SDGs to measure development impact of water investments. The workshop is organized by the OECD with support from Norway and the EU and aims
What is Water Security?
Google Translate
Share:
GWP’s global strategy 2009-2013 argues that sustainable development will not be achieved without a water secure world. A water secure world integrates a concern for the intrinsic value of water with a concern for its use for human survival and well-being.
A water secure world harnesses water's productive power and minimises its destructive force. It is a world where every person has enough safe, affordable water to lead a clean, healthy and productive life. It is a world where communities are protected from floods, droughts, landslides, erosion and water-borne diseases. Water security also means addressing environmental protection and the negative effects of poor management.
A water secure world means ending fragmented responsibility for water and integrating water resources management across all sectors – finance, planning, agriculture, energy, tourism, industry, education and health. This integration is at the heart of GWP’s strategy.
A water secure world reduces poverty, advances education, and increases living standards. It is a world where there is an improved quality of life for all, especially for the most vulnerable—usually women and children—who benefit most from good water governance.
What is Water Security?
Google Translate
Share:
GWP’s global strategy 2009-2013 argues that sustainable development will not be achieved without a water secure world. A water secure world integrates a concern for the intrinsic value of water with a concern for its use for human survival and well-being.
A water secure world harnesses water's productive power and minimises its destructive force. It is a world where every person has enough safe, affordable water to lead a clean, healthy and productive life. It is a world where communities are protected from floods, droughts, landslides, erosion and water-borne diseases. Water security also means addressing environmental protection and the negative effects of poor management.
A water secure world means ending fragmented responsibility for water and integrating water resources management across all sectors – finance, planning, agriculture, energy, tourism, industry, education and health. This integration is at the heart of GWP’s strategy.
A water secure world reduces poverty, advances education, and increases living standards. It is a world where there is an improved quality of life for all, especially for the most vulnerable—usually women and children—who benefit most from good water governance.
Address to the Global Water Partnership (GWP)'s Consulting Partners Meeting 2009, on the subject of how GWP CACENA can help resolve water resource related conflicts in Central Asia and Caucasus.
6 years of Petersberg Phase II/Athens
Declaration Process, Contribution to the successful
story of Drin Dialogue
International Roundtable on Protection and Sustainable Use of Trans-boundary Waters in South East Europe, 15-16 December 2011, Zagreb, Croatia
The second Sanitation and Water for All (SWA) Partnership Meeting took place in Geneva, Switzerland from 11-13 November 2013, hosted by SWA partner the Swiss Agency for Development Cooperation.
This report gives insights into the dialogue and discussion that took place and is mainly intended for those who are already engaging in SWA at various levels, including those who attended the Geneva meeting.
The OECD workshop on water integrity will provide an opportunity to discuss challenges and best practices in promoting integrity in water services and resources management, across OECD and non OECD countries. It will help diagnose major governance obstacles, and identify valuable lessons from project and policy levels, including from related sectors such as energy and agriculture. More information at www.oecd.org/governance/watergovernanceprogramme.htm
Address to the Global Water Partnership (GWP)'s Consulting Partners Meeting 2009, on the subject of how GWP CACENA can help resolve water resource related conflicts in Central Asia and Caucasus.
6 years of Petersberg Phase II/Athens
Declaration Process, Contribution to the successful
story of Drin Dialogue
International Roundtable on Protection and Sustainable Use of Trans-boundary Waters in South East Europe, 15-16 December 2011, Zagreb, Croatia
The second Sanitation and Water for All (SWA) Partnership Meeting took place in Geneva, Switzerland from 11-13 November 2013, hosted by SWA partner the Swiss Agency for Development Cooperation.
This report gives insights into the dialogue and discussion that took place and is mainly intended for those who are already engaging in SWA at various levels, including those who attended the Geneva meeting.
The OECD workshop on water integrity will provide an opportunity to discuss challenges and best practices in promoting integrity in water services and resources management, across OECD and non OECD countries. It will help diagnose major governance obstacles, and identify valuable lessons from project and policy levels, including from related sectors such as energy and agriculture. More information at www.oecd.org/governance/watergovernanceprogramme.htm
OECD Green Talks LIVE | Diving deeper: the evolving landscape for assessing w...OECD Environment
Water is critical for meeting commitments of the Paris Agreement and achieving the Sustainable Development Goals. Our economies rely on water, with recent estimates putting the economic value of water and freshwater ecosystems at USD 58 trillion - equivalent to 60% of global GDP. At the same time, water related risks are increasing in frequency and scale in the context of climate change.
How are investments shaping our economies and societies exposure to water risk? What role can the financial system play in supporting water security? And how can increased understanding of how finance both impacts and depends on water resources spur action towards greater water security?
This OECD Green Talks LIVE on Tuesday 14 May 2024 from 15:00 to 16:00 CEST discussed the evolving landscape for assessing water risks to the financial system.
OECD Policy Analyst Lylah Davies presented key findings and recommendations from recent OECD work on assessing the financial materiality of water-related risks, including the recently published paper “Watered down? Investigating the financial materiality of water-related risks” and was joined by experts to discuss relevant initiatives underway.
Detlef Van Vuuren- Integrated modelling for interrelated crises.pdfOECD Environment
This OECD technical workshop will bring together leading experts on economic, biophysical, and integrated assessment modelling of the interactions between climate change, biodiversity loss, and pollution. The workshop will take stock of ongoing modelling efforts to develop quantitative pathways to study the drivers and impacts of the triple planetary crisis, and the policies to address it. The aim is to identify robust modelling approaches to inform the work for the upcoming OECD Environmental Outlook.
Thomas Hertel- Integrated Policies for the Triple Planetary Crisis.pdfOECD Environment
This OECD technical workshop will bring together leading experts on economic, biophysical, and integrated assessment modelling of the interactions between climate change, biodiversity loss, and pollution. The workshop will take stock of ongoing modelling efforts to develop quantitative pathways to study the drivers and impacts of the triple planetary crisis, and the policies to address it. The aim is to identify robust modelling approaches to inform the work for the upcoming OECD Environmental Outlook.
Jon Sampedro - Assessing synergies and trade offs for health and sustainable ...OECD Environment
This OECD technical workshop will bring together leading experts on economic, biophysical, and integrated assessment modelling of the interactions between climate change, biodiversity loss, and pollution. The workshop will take stock of ongoing modelling efforts to develop quantitative pathways to study the drivers and impacts of the triple planetary crisis, and the policies to address it. The aim is to identify robust modelling approaches to inform the work for the upcoming OECD Environmental Outlook.
Astrid Bos - Identifying trade offs & searching for synergies.pdfOECD Environment
This OECD technical workshop will bring together leading experts on economic, biophysical, and integrated assessment modelling of the interactions between climate change, biodiversity loss, and pollution. The workshop will take stock of ongoing modelling efforts to develop quantitative pathways to study the drivers and impacts of the triple planetary crisis, and the policies to address it. The aim is to identify robust modelling approaches to inform the work for the upcoming OECD Environmental Outlook.
Ruth Delzeit - Modelling environmental and socio-economic impacts of cropland...OECD Environment
This OECD technical workshop will bring together leading experts on economic, biophysical, and integrated assessment modelling of the interactions between climate change, biodiversity loss, and pollution. The workshop will take stock of ongoing modelling efforts to develop quantitative pathways to study the drivers and impacts of the triple planetary crisis, and the policies to address it. The aim is to identify robust modelling approaches to inform the work for the upcoming OECD Environmental Outlook.
Wilfried Winiwarter - Implementing nitrogen pollution control pathways in the...OECD Environment
This OECD technical workshop will bring together leading experts on economic, biophysical, and integrated assessment modelling of the interactions between climate change, biodiversity loss, and pollution. The workshop will take stock of ongoing modelling efforts to develop quantitative pathways to study the drivers and impacts of the triple planetary crisis, and the policies to address it. The aim is to identify robust modelling approaches to inform the work for the upcoming OECD Environmental Outlook.
Laurent Drouet - Physical and Economic Risks of Climate Change.pdfOECD Environment
This OECD technical workshop will bring together leading experts on economic, biophysical, and integrated assessment modelling of the interactions between climate change, biodiversity loss, and pollution. The workshop will take stock of ongoing modelling efforts to develop quantitative pathways to study the drivers and impacts of the triple planetary crisis, and the policies to address it. The aim is to identify robust modelling approaches to inform the work for the upcoming OECD Environmental Outlook.
This OECD technical workshop will bring together leading experts on economic, biophysical, and integrated assessment modelling of the interactions between climate change, biodiversity loss, and pollution. The workshop will take stock of ongoing modelling efforts to develop quantitative pathways to study the drivers and impacts of the triple planetary crisis, and the policies to address it. The aim is to identify robust modelling approaches to inform the work for the upcoming OECD Environmental Outlook.
HyeJin Kim and Simon Smart - The biodiversity nexus across multiple drivers: ...OECD Environment
This OECD technical workshop will bring together leading experts on economic, biophysical, and integrated assessment modelling of the interactions between climate change, biodiversity loss, and pollution. The workshop will take stock of ongoing modelling efforts to develop quantitative pathways to study the drivers and impacts of the triple planetary crisis, and the policies to address it. The aim is to identify robust modelling approaches to inform the work for the upcoming OECD Environmental Outlook.
Case Study: Peptides-based Plant Protection Product (harpin proteins*) by Ros...OECD Environment
The seminar on Problem Formulation for the Risk Assessment of Biopesticides stemmed from a previous CRP-sponsored event on Innovating Microbial Pesticide Testing that identified the need for an overarching guidance document to determine when in vivo tests are necessary. Problem Formulation, a common practice in pesticide risk assessment, was highlighted as a useful approach for addressing uncertainties in data requirements for biopesticides.
The seminar featured presentations from various perspectives, including industry, regulatory bodies, and academia. Topics included the history and principles of Problem Formulation, industry perspectives on Problem Formulation and how it is applied internally for microbial pesticides, regulatory approaches, and specific case studies. The seminar provided an overview of the challenges, considerations, and potential solutions in harmonising Problem Formulation for biopesticide risk assessment. It emphasised the need for collaboration and discussion to develop Problem Formulation guidance for biopesticides.
CLE Contribution on the Assessment of Innovative Biochemicals in the EU Statu...OECD Environment
The seminar on Problem Formulation for the Risk Assessment of Biopesticides stemmed from a previous CRP-sponsored event on Innovating Microbial Pesticide Testing that identified the need for an overarching guidance document to determine when in vivo tests are necessary. Problem Formulation, a common practice in pesticide risk assessment, was highlighted as a useful approach for addressing uncertainties in data requirements for biopesticides.
The seminar featured presentations from various perspectives, including industry, regulatory bodies, and academia. Topics included the history and principles of Problem Formulation, industry perspectives on Problem Formulation and how it is applied internally for microbial pesticides, regulatory approaches, and specific case studies. The seminar provided an overview of the challenges, considerations, and potential solutions in harmonising Problem Formulation for biopesticide risk assessment. It emphasised the need for collaboration and discussion to develop Problem Formulation guidance for biopesticides.
Additional Considerations for Pesticide Formulations Containing Microbial Pes...OECD Environment
The seminar on Problem Formulation for the Risk Assessment of Biopesticides stemmed from a previous CRP-sponsored event on Innovating Microbial Pesticide Testing that identified the need for an overarching guidance document to determine when in vivo tests are necessary. Problem Formulation, a common practice in pesticide risk assessment, was highlighted as a useful approach for addressing uncertainties in data requirements for biopesticides.
The seminar featured presentations from various perspectives, including industry, regulatory bodies, and academia. Topics included the history and principles of Problem Formulation, industry perspectives on Problem Formulation and how it is applied internally for microbial pesticides, regulatory approaches, and specific case studies. The seminar provided an overview of the challenges, considerations, and potential solutions in harmonising Problem Formulation for biopesticide risk assessment. It emphasised the need for collaboration and discussion to develop Problem Formulation guidance for biopesticides.
Role of genome sequencing (WGS) in microbial biopesticides safety assessment ...OECD Environment
The seminar on Problem Formulation for the Risk Assessment of Biopesticides stemmed from a previous CRP-sponsored event on Innovating Microbial Pesticide Testing that identified the need for an overarching guidance document to determine when in vivo tests are necessary. Problem Formulation, a common practice in pesticide risk assessment, was highlighted as a useful approach for addressing uncertainties in data requirements for biopesticides.
The seminar featured presentations from various perspectives, including industry, regulatory bodies, and academia. Topics included the history and principles of Problem Formulation, industry perspectives on Problem Formulation and how it is applied internally for microbial pesticides, regulatory approaches, and specific case studies. The seminar provided an overview of the challenges, considerations, and potential solutions in harmonising Problem Formulation for biopesticide risk assessment. It emphasised the need for collaboration and discussion to develop Problem Formulation guidance for biopesticides.
Considerations for Problem Formulation for Human Health Safety Assessments of...OECD Environment
The seminar on Problem Formulation for the Risk Assessment of Biopesticides stemmed from a previous CRP-sponsored event on Innovating Microbial Pesticide Testing that identified the need for an overarching guidance document to determine when in vivo tests are necessary. Problem Formulation, a common practice in pesticide risk assessment, was highlighted as a useful approach for addressing uncertainties in data requirements for biopesticides.
The seminar featured presentations from various perspectives, including industry, regulatory bodies, and academia. Topics included the history and principles of Problem Formulation, industry perspectives on Problem Formulation and how it is applied internally for microbial pesticides, regulatory approaches, and specific case studies. The seminar provided an overview of the challenges, considerations, and potential solutions in harmonising Problem Formulation for biopesticide risk assessment. It emphasised the need for collaboration and discussion to develop Problem Formulation guidance for biopesticides.
How to Identify and Quantify Mixtures What is Essential to Know for Risk Asse...OECD Environment
The seminar on Problem Formulation for the Risk Assessment of Biopesticides stemmed from a previous CRP-sponsored event on Innovating Microbial Pesticide Testing that identified the need for an overarching guidance document to determine when in vivo tests are necessary. Problem Formulation, a common practice in pesticide risk assessment, was highlighted as a useful approach for addressing uncertainties in data requirements for biopesticides.
The seminar featured presentations from various perspectives, including industry, regulatory bodies, and academia. Topics included the history and principles of Problem Formulation, industry perspectives on Problem Formulation and how it is applied internally for microbial pesticides, regulatory approaches, and specific case studies. The seminar provided an overview of the challenges, considerations, and potential solutions in harmonising Problem Formulation for biopesticide risk assessment. It emphasised the need for collaboration and discussion to develop Problem Formulation guidance for biopesticides.
APVMA outcome-focussed approach to data requirements to support registration ...OECD Environment
The seminar on Problem Formulation for the Risk Assessment of Biopesticides stemmed from a previous CRP-sponsored event on Innovating Microbial Pesticide Testing that identified the need for an overarching guidance document to determine when in vivo tests are necessary. Problem Formulation, a common practice in pesticide risk assessment, was highlighted as a useful approach for addressing uncertainties in data requirements for biopesticides.
The seminar featured presentations from various perspectives, including industry, regulatory bodies, and academia. Topics included the history and principles of Problem Formulation, industry perspectives on Problem Formulation and how it is applied internally for microbial pesticides, regulatory approaches, and specific case studies. The seminar provided an overview of the challenges, considerations, and potential solutions in harmonising Problem Formulation for biopesticide risk assessment. It emphasised the need for collaboration and discussion to develop Problem Formulation guidance for biopesticides.
The U.S. Perspective on Problem Formulation for Biopesticides: Shannon BORGESOECD Environment
The seminar on Problem Formulation for the Risk Assessment of Biopesticides stemmed from a previous CRP-sponsored event on Innovating Microbial Pesticide Testing that identified the need for an overarching guidance document to determine when in vivo tests are necessary. Problem Formulation, a common practice in pesticide risk assessment, was highlighted as a useful approach for addressing uncertainties in data requirements for biopesticides.
The seminar featured presentations from various perspectives, including industry, regulatory bodies, and academia. Topics included the history and principles of Problem Formulation, industry perspectives on Problem Formulation and how it is applied internally for microbial pesticides, regulatory approaches, and specific case studies. The seminar provided an overview of the challenges, considerations, and potential solutions in harmonising Problem Formulation for biopesticide risk assessment. It emphasised the need for collaboration and discussion to develop Problem Formulation guidance for biopesticides.
Problem formulation for environmental risk assessment – Finnish case study: ...OECD Environment
The seminar on Problem Formulation for the Risk Assessment of Biopesticides stemmed from a previous CRP-sponsored event on Innovating Microbial Pesticide Testing that identified the need for an overarching guidance document to determine when in vivo tests are necessary. Problem Formulation, a common practice in pesticide risk assessment, was highlighted as a useful approach for addressing uncertainties in data requirements for biopesticides.
The seminar featured presentations from various perspectives, including industry, regulatory bodies, and academia. Topics included the history and principles of Problem Formulation, industry perspectives on Problem Formulation and how it is applied internally for microbial pesticides, regulatory approaches, and specific case studies. The seminar provided an overview of the challenges, considerations, and potential solutions in harmonising Problem Formulation for biopesticide risk assessment. It emphasised the need for collaboration and discussion to develop Problem Formulation guidance for biopesticides.
Natural farming @ Dr. Siddhartha S. Jena.pptxsidjena70
A brief about organic farming/ Natural farming/ Zero budget natural farming/ Subash Palekar Natural farming which keeps us and environment safe and healthy. Next gen Agricultural practices of chemical free farming.
"Understanding the Carbon Cycle: Processes, Human Impacts, and Strategies for...MMariSelvam4
The carbon cycle is a critical component of Earth's environmental system, governing the movement and transformation of carbon through various reservoirs, including the atmosphere, oceans, soil, and living organisms. This complex cycle involves several key processes such as photosynthesis, respiration, decomposition, and carbon sequestration, each contributing to the regulation of carbon levels on the planet.
Human activities, particularly fossil fuel combustion and deforestation, have significantly altered the natural carbon cycle, leading to increased atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations and driving climate change. Understanding the intricacies of the carbon cycle is essential for assessing the impacts of these changes and developing effective mitigation strategies.
By studying the carbon cycle, scientists can identify carbon sources and sinks, measure carbon fluxes, and predict future trends. This knowledge is crucial for crafting policies aimed at reducing carbon emissions, enhancing carbon storage, and promoting sustainable practices. The carbon cycle's interplay with climate systems, ecosystems, and human activities underscores its importance in maintaining a stable and healthy planet.
In-depth exploration of the carbon cycle reveals the delicate balance required to sustain life and the urgent need to address anthropogenic influences. Through research, education, and policy, we can work towards restoring equilibrium in the carbon cycle and ensuring a sustainable future for generations to come.
Willie Nelson Net Worth: A Journey Through Music, Movies, and Business Venturesgreendigital
Willie Nelson is a name that resonates within the world of music and entertainment. Known for his unique voice, and masterful guitar skills. and an extraordinary career spanning several decades. Nelson has become a legend in the country music scene. But, his influence extends far beyond the realm of music. with ventures in acting, writing, activism, and business. This comprehensive article delves into Willie Nelson net worth. exploring the various facets of his career that have contributed to his large fortune.
Follow us on: Pinterest
Introduction
Willie Nelson net worth is a testament to his enduring influence and success in many fields. Born on April 29, 1933, in Abbott, Texas. Nelson's journey from a humble beginning to becoming one of the most iconic figures in American music is nothing short of inspirational. His net worth, which estimated to be around $25 million as of 2024. reflects a career that is as diverse as it is prolific.
Early Life and Musical Beginnings
Humble Origins
Willie Hugh Nelson was born during the Great Depression. a time of significant economic hardship in the United States. Raised by his grandparents. Nelson found solace and inspiration in music from an early age. His grandmother taught him to play the guitar. setting the stage for what would become an illustrious career.
First Steps in Music
Nelson's initial foray into the music industry was fraught with challenges. He moved to Nashville, Tennessee, to pursue his dreams, but success did not come . Working as a songwriter, Nelson penned hits for other artists. which helped him gain a foothold in the competitive music scene. His songwriting skills contributed to his early earnings. laying the foundation for his net worth.
Rise to Stardom
Breakthrough Albums
The 1970s marked a turning point in Willie Nelson's career. His albums "Shotgun Willie" (1973), "Red Headed Stranger" (1975). and "Stardust" (1978) received critical acclaim and commercial success. These albums not only solidified his position in the country music genre. but also introduced his music to a broader audience. The success of these albums played a crucial role in boosting Willie Nelson net worth.
Iconic Songs
Willie Nelson net worth is also attributed to his extensive catalog of hit songs. Tracks like "Blue Eyes Crying in the Rain," "On the Road Again," and "Always on My Mind" have become timeless classics. These songs have not only earned Nelson large royalties but have also ensured his continued relevance in the music industry.
Acting and Film Career
Hollywood Ventures
In addition to his music career, Willie Nelson has also made a mark in Hollywood. His distinctive personality and on-screen presence have landed him roles in several films and television shows. Notable appearances include roles in "The Electric Horseman" (1979), "Honeysuckle Rose" (1980), and "Barbarosa" (1982). These acting gigs have added a significant amount to Willie Nelson net worth.
Television Appearances
Nelson's char
UNDERSTANDING WHAT GREEN WASHING IS!.pdfJulietMogola
Many companies today use green washing to lure the public into thinking they are conserving the environment but in real sense they are doing more harm. There have been such several cases from very big companies here in Kenya and also globally. This ranges from various sectors from manufacturing and goes to consumer products. Educating people on greenwashing will enable people to make better choices based on their analysis and not on what they see on marketing sites.
Characterization and the Kinetics of drying at the drying oven and with micro...Open Access Research Paper
The objective of this work is to contribute to valorization de Nephelium lappaceum by the characterization of kinetics of drying of seeds of Nephelium lappaceum. The seeds were dehydrated until a constant mass respectively in a drying oven and a microwawe oven. The temperatures and the powers of drying are respectively: 50, 60 and 70°C and 140, 280 and 420 W. The results show that the curves of drying of seeds of Nephelium lappaceum do not present a phase of constant kinetics. The coefficients of diffusion vary between 2.09.10-8 to 2.98. 10-8m-2/s in the interval of 50°C at 70°C and between 4.83×10-07 at 9.04×10-07 m-8/s for the powers going of 140 W with 420 W the relation between Arrhenius and a value of energy of activation of 16.49 kJ. mol-1 expressed the effect of the temperature on effective diffusivity.
WRI’s brand new “Food Service Playbook for Promoting Sustainable Food Choices” gives food service operators the very latest strategies for creating dining environments that empower consumers to choose sustainable, plant-rich dishes. This research builds off our first guide for food service, now with industry experience and insights from nearly 350 academic trials.
Agenda Capacity Development Workshop on SDGs 23-24 November 2020
1. Capacity Development Workshop on Water-related SDGs
Integration and Implementation in Eastern Partnership (EaP) Countries and beyond
- virtual workshop on ZOOM, 23-24 November 2020, 09:15-12:30 CET -
Registration: https://meetoecd1.zoom.us/meeting/register/tJAtc-uoqTMvHNfP21eRlcQ8mafeR3mQ0D7H
Background
Since 2015, Eastern Partnership (EaP) countries1
have made some progress in nationalising Sustainable
Development Goals (SDGs), often with support from development partners. However, the countries still face
challenges in both: (i) integrating SDGs into policy frameworks, using them as policy objectives in strategies
and plans; and (ii) meeting the water-related SDGs by 2030, recognising that many countries in the region and
internationally are behind schedule. Challenges include those linked to national data collection and
monitoring frameworks and the lack of coherent, prioritised strategic and mid-term plans. The present crisis
triggered by Covid-related restrictions has reduced household income and fiscal capacity of many countries,
exacerbating affordability constraints and compounding these challenges. These challenges reduce
opportunities for: mobilising sufficient finance for delivering water-related SDGs, using available funds in the
most cost-effective way and measuring the development impact in terms of progress towards the SDGs.
The workshop is organised by the OECD GREEN Action Task Force with support by the Government of Norway
and the European Union through the European Union Water Initiative Plus for the Eastern Partnership
(EUWI+).
Objectives. To develop capacity of the EaP countries in this domain through sharing good practices and lessons
learned from the EU and OECD countries and from within the Eastern Partnership and wider Eurasia region: it
concerns establishing monitoring frameworks for nationalised SDG indicators, integrating them into national
policy documents, and effectively using finance for water-related SDGs.
This workshop will demonstrate the role of water-related SDGs as a tool for strengthening water management
in terms of building confidence in, mobilising finance for, and driving the implementation of, strategic water
management plans; and for tracking progress towards achieving national water policy objectives and
international obligations, as well as measuring development impact of interventions in the water sector.
Structure. Prior to the workshop, a questionnaire will be circulated to participants and relevant stakeholders,
based on which a discussion note will be prepared to support the workshop. The workshop will be held
virtually, on ZOOM, with simultaneous interpretation in English and Russian. It will consist of two parts, half
a day each, from 09:15 to 12:30 CET.
Invitees: Government officials and experts from all EaP and selected EECCA countries, donors, selected EU and
OECD members, International Organisations (IOs) and think tanks, national and multilateral development
financing institutions (DFIs) operating in the region.
1 The Eastern Partnership countries are Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Georgia, Republic of Moldova and Ukraine.
2. ANNOTATED PRELIMINARY AGENDA
23-24 November 2020
Part I (Day 1, 09:15 – 13:00 CET)
Chaired by: Ms Kumi Kitamori, Head of GGGR Division, OECD Environment Directorate
Item 1: Opening and Welcome (09:15-09:30)
The objectives of the capacity development workshop (as outlined above) and the workshop agenda will be presented.
o a family photo
o Overview by OECD Environment Directorate, Matthew Griffiths, Senior Programme Manager
Meeting document: pre-final annotated Agenda (based on this draft)
Item 2: Scene-setting (09:30 – 10:00)
Scene-stetting presentations will focus on: (i) progress with implementing SDGs in general, and water-related SDGs in
particular, globally and in developed countries (OECD, EU) and developing countries and transition economies;
(ii) importance of using an integrated approach to SDGs in line with IWRM principles; and (iii) lessons learnt,
outstanding issues, existing barriers and opportunities.
• Mr. Federico Properzi, Chief Technical Advisor, UN-Water, on the SDG 6 Global Acceleration framework
• Mr. Colin Herron, Global Coordinator, Water Solutions for the SDGs (GWP)
• Q&A session (5-10 minutes)
Item 3: Nationalising water-related SDGs (10:00 – 11:35)
Moderator: Mr. Peter VAN DE VEN, Head of National Accounts Division, Statistics and Data Directorate,
OECD
This session will aim to foster exchange of country experiences with nationalising of, and establishing monitoring
framework for, water-related SDGs. Other complementary indicators, such as Green Growth Indicators, will be discussed
where relevant. The results from the pre-workshop questionnaire shared prior to the event will serve as a basis for
discussion. Speakers from EaP and other EECCA countries will present their countries experience and exchange on lessons
learnt (each country presentation up to 12 min.):
• Belarus: country experience with adopting methodology to monitor “nationalised” indicators for specific tasks
under SDG 6.3-6.5
o Ms Dubianok, Deputy Director for Research, Central Research Institute for Complex Use of Water
Resources (CRICUWR); and
o Ms Poleshchuk, Head of Environment Statistics Division, BelStat
• Ukraine: country experience with nationalising SDGs and associated challenges
o Ms Hanna Tsvetkova, Environment Academy and NWP of Ukraine
• Russian Federation: water related SDGs in Russia
o Ms Natalia Shashlova, Head, Department of Agriculture and Environment Protection Statistics, Federal
State Statistics Service (ROSSTAT)
• Armenia: establishing an integrated monitoring system for SDG 6 in Armenia
o Ms Alisa Savadyan, GWP Armenia
3. • Q&A on the experiences from Armenia, Belarus, Russia and Ukraine
• Exchange of other experiences (6 -7 min each, with option to support with PowerPoint slides)
o Participants from Kazakhstan on developing water security indicators consistent with water related
nationally adopted GGIs and SDGs
o Ms. Iulia Trombitcaia, Environmental Affairs Officer, Water Convention, UNECE, on assisting EECCA
countries in developing their capacity to report on SDG 6.5.2.
o Open discussion
Meeting documents:
(i) reports on experience of Belarus with implementing water related SDGs; and of Kyrgyzstan on establishing a
national framework for water, food and energy security indicators
(ii) draft OECD ENV Working paper on developing water security indicators in Kazakhstan
Technical break (11:35-11.45)
Item 4: Integrating water-related SDGs into national policy documents (11:45-12:50)
Moderator: Matthew Griffiths, Senior Programme Manager, OECD Environment Directorate
This session will focus on country experiences of integrating nationalised SDGs into national policy documents. To launch
the discussion, a presentation of the pre-workshop questionnaire will serve as a basis for discussion.
• Why integration into policy documents and budgets is critical to progress implementation of SDGs
o Mr Alexandre Martoussevitch, Project Manager, OECD Environment Directorate
• Moldova: SDG 6 integration into: (i) the national WSS Strategy and (ii) the National Programme on Water and
Health
o Ms Tronza, Principle consultant, Ministry of Agriculture, Regional Development and Environment
o commented by Ms. Nataliya Nikiforova, Environmental Affairs Officer, UNECE
• Ms. Zsuzsa Steindl, GWP Hungary Foundation, will speak on Integrating water related SDGs into Hungarian
policy documents
• Tour de table: other countries will be invited to present their experience with integrating water related SDGs
into national policy documents and eventually also into policy documents at sub-sovereign level (3-4 min each):
o Mr. George Dzamukashvili, Chair, NWP Georgia
• Q&A followed by open discussion
Meeting document: an issue note prepared by the OECD secretariat
Wrap up of Day 1 (12:50-13:00)
4. Part II (Day 2, 09:15-12:30 CET)
Chaired by: Matthew Griffiths, Senior Programme Manager, OECD Environment Directorate
o a family photo
Item 5: Mobilising and effectively using finance for water-related SDGs (09:20 – 10:40)
Moderators: Mr Paul HORROCKS, OECD Development Cooperation Directorate
This session will aim to exchange good practices in mobilising and effectively using finance for water-related SDGs.
Representatives of countries and development banks will be invited to present their experience with mobilising sovereign
and non-sovereign, public and private finance and ODA for water-related SDGs (incl. blended finance).
• Mr Paul Horrocks, OECD Development Cooperation Directorate, a short introduction
• Ms. Juliana Ramos, Operations Policy and Project Support, NDB, will present case study examples of
water-related infrastructure projects in the Bank’s member countries
• Ms. Claudia Neuschulz, EBRD, ERBD experience in mobilising finance for SDG 6: Green finance for
municipal water services and corporate water use
• Q&A
• Tour de table: country representatives will be invited to present their experience with mobilising and
effectively using finance for water related SDGs
o Ms. Gvantsa Sivsivadze, Ministry of Environmental Protection and Agriculture, Georgia
• Open Discussion
Technical break (10:40-10:50)
Item 6: SDGs as a tool for measuring development impact of water-sector investment (10:50 – 12:15)
Moderator: Matthew Griffiths, Senior Programme Manager, OECD Environment Directorate
SDGs can be used as a tool for measuring the development impact on the ground of interventions in the water sector
financed from the public budget, ODA or blended financing. During this session, countries, national and multi-lateral
Development Financing Institutions would share their experience in this domain. The facilitator will give the floor to
speakers:
• Mr. Luiz Loures, Strategy and Partnerships Division, NDB, will present the NDB’s SDG mapping
methods and alignment with water-related SDGs
• Ms. Anna Lvova, Head of International Relations and Communications Department, the
International Investment Bank
• Q&A session
• Exchange of experience from other countries and development institutions (5-7 min each, speakers
invited)
o Belarus on using water related SDGs as target and performance indicators of the new Water
Strategy
o Other experiences – open floor for interventions
• Open discussion
Wrap-up and closing (12:15-12:30)