Cher well L earning 
BULLETIN - February 2012 
Research overview - 5 ideas on: Tasks and Activities 
EWAP task setting 
When setting tasks, think EWAP - Everything With a Purpose - 
what is the point of this activity and how is it helping the students 
to make progress towards what you want them to learn? (The Lazy 
Teacher’s Handbook, Jim Smith). 
Implications for our teaching: 
- pur-poseful 
Are the tasks we are setting directly helping the students to make progress? 
- Are we in the habit of putting tasks in to ‘get them thinking’, or 
‘warm them up’? If so, is this working, or is it getting in the way of the 
real learning we want them to undertake? Do we need that starter or 
extra help-ing 
activity? Is that time-consuming ‘attention grabber’ really them to think about the concepts we need them to engage with? 
Low-access/ high-challenge tasks 
. ALL of the students need to be able to undertake the task 
meaningfully, and there needs to be challenge built in for the top 
end. (NRICH Project). Students know when they are being set low-value, 
filler tasks, and put much less effort in to these tasks. It’s 
therefore important that we plan tasks to be as valuable and pur 
poseful as possible - they should be ‘worth their weight in learning’ 
Implications for our teaching: 
- How can we set success criteria for tasks, so that there is open-ended 
challenge for all, in every task? What are our entry level requirements, 
and what might students do to explore excellent in their completion 
of the task? 
- How do we provide challenge in every task, no matter how small? 
For example, when using questioning at the beginning of a lesson, 
challenge can be provided from the start by asking fewer questions, 
but putting more emphasis on the quality of the response that stu-dents 
are coming up with. 
Getting them to Think 
- ‘Memory / learning is a residue of thought’...’You remember what you think 
about’ - the only way we can get students to understand new material is to get 
them to think meaningfully about the subject matter or concepts that we are t 
rying to get across (and the only way we can think about anything, is to link it t 
o similar knowledge that we already understand). The main point of setting 
ANY activities or tasks is to get students to think purposefully about the 
knowledge or skills that we want them to learn. (Why Don’t Students Like School? 
Daniel Willingham) 
Implications for our teaching: 
- Review lesson plans in terms of ‘what the student is likely to think about’. 
- when introducing new content or ideas, always try to make links with similar con-tent 
or ideas that the students already understand. 
- Take care with ‘attention grabbers’ - how can we make sure that they direct think-ing 
purposefully, and don’t distract? This is a particular challenge when setting cre-ative 
/ active tasks - how do we make sure they think about the learning, and not 
just the socially-involving experience of doing the task itself? 
- Moving away from IRE questioning and using strategies such as ‘think time’ and Ques-tioning 
for Engagement gives us a better chance of being confident that students 
are thinking about the right things in lessons. 
How many tasks? 
- Sometimes, lessons are less successful because the teacher has worked too 
hard and provided too many activities. ‘We don’t want to see lessons 
that are too crowded, too frenetic and with too many activities 
designed simply to impress the inspectors’ (Wilshaw / Ofsted 
Guidance). Often, this can suppress learning, as students aren’t required to 
become immersed in any particular task, and therefore don’t find the depth 
and challenge in the activity. Whilst variety in tasks is important, and can help 
students to learn, it’s also important that students work hard in lessons on 
completing carefully set-up, substantial tasks. 
Implications for our teaching: 
- Are we setting tasks that challenge students, and ask them to really 
get stuck in to the learning? Is there the potential, in every task we set, 
for students to work hard, push themselves and feel justifiably proud 
of what they achieve? Sometimes, it’s better to take tasks out of les-sons, 
in order to provide the time and attention needed to do the re-maining 
tasks really well. 
- Are we providing the conditions in which students can work hard 
and without distraction, eg by using strategies like the C-system, struc-turing 
group / paired activities carefully and using periods of silent 
work at times? 
- Are we planning too many tasks? Are we working too hard, so that 
the students don’t end up having to? 
Some tasks and activities that (might!) work: 
Top 5: ask students to choose a top 5 from a particular topic (eg 
causes of WW1, factors needed for photosynthesis to occur, rea 
sons we should act on global warming, characteristics needed of a 
leader, ways to skin a cat). They need to: List all 5, Explain their 
top 3, and Justify their top 1 (teaching of explanation / justifica 
tion needed!) 
Here’s the answer, what’s the question? Give them an answer, 
they make a list of possible questions which would result in that 
answer. 
Use www.wordle.net to create a word cloud of text from your 
topic (eg the course syllabus, a relevant website, an online article) - 
students can then be asked to explain the reasons why some words 
and ideas are high-frequency, and make links between the words 
which appear on the cloud. 
- Get ideas on activities from the Random Learning Event Genera-tor, 
at www.bit.ly/AGQwn (sample task - Do ‘uses of the apostrophe’ 
as ‘an abstract impressionist painting) (!) 
- Speed draw what you learnt last lesson (either in your own subject 
or wherever they’ve just come from) 
- Britain’s Hexago-ing Crazy - put key learning points from your 
topic onto hexagons - students make hexagon maps, annotating them 
to show the main ideas link together 
Quiz-Quiz-Trade - always a winner - you are the students prepare 
cards with a question on one side and the answer on the other. Stu-dents 
walk around the room, find a partner, high 5, answer their part-ners 
question, then the cards are traded and off they go again. 
Reduced Learning Company - students prepare a 30 second piece 
of drama at the end of the lesson, showing what they’ve learnt.

Activities cl

  • 1.
    Cher well Learning BULLETIN - February 2012 Research overview - 5 ideas on: Tasks and Activities EWAP task setting When setting tasks, think EWAP - Everything With a Purpose - what is the point of this activity and how is it helping the students to make progress towards what you want them to learn? (The Lazy Teacher’s Handbook, Jim Smith). Implications for our teaching: - pur-poseful Are the tasks we are setting directly helping the students to make progress? - Are we in the habit of putting tasks in to ‘get them thinking’, or ‘warm them up’? If so, is this working, or is it getting in the way of the real learning we want them to undertake? Do we need that starter or extra help-ing activity? Is that time-consuming ‘attention grabber’ really them to think about the concepts we need them to engage with? Low-access/ high-challenge tasks . ALL of the students need to be able to undertake the task meaningfully, and there needs to be challenge built in for the top end. (NRICH Project). Students know when they are being set low-value, filler tasks, and put much less effort in to these tasks. It’s therefore important that we plan tasks to be as valuable and pur poseful as possible - they should be ‘worth their weight in learning’ Implications for our teaching: - How can we set success criteria for tasks, so that there is open-ended challenge for all, in every task? What are our entry level requirements, and what might students do to explore excellent in their completion of the task? - How do we provide challenge in every task, no matter how small? For example, when using questioning at the beginning of a lesson, challenge can be provided from the start by asking fewer questions, but putting more emphasis on the quality of the response that stu-dents are coming up with. Getting them to Think - ‘Memory / learning is a residue of thought’...’You remember what you think about’ - the only way we can get students to understand new material is to get them to think meaningfully about the subject matter or concepts that we are t rying to get across (and the only way we can think about anything, is to link it t o similar knowledge that we already understand). The main point of setting ANY activities or tasks is to get students to think purposefully about the knowledge or skills that we want them to learn. (Why Don’t Students Like School? Daniel Willingham) Implications for our teaching: - Review lesson plans in terms of ‘what the student is likely to think about’. - when introducing new content or ideas, always try to make links with similar con-tent or ideas that the students already understand. - Take care with ‘attention grabbers’ - how can we make sure that they direct think-ing purposefully, and don’t distract? This is a particular challenge when setting cre-ative / active tasks - how do we make sure they think about the learning, and not just the socially-involving experience of doing the task itself? - Moving away from IRE questioning and using strategies such as ‘think time’ and Ques-tioning for Engagement gives us a better chance of being confident that students are thinking about the right things in lessons. How many tasks? - Sometimes, lessons are less successful because the teacher has worked too hard and provided too many activities. ‘We don’t want to see lessons that are too crowded, too frenetic and with too many activities designed simply to impress the inspectors’ (Wilshaw / Ofsted Guidance). Often, this can suppress learning, as students aren’t required to become immersed in any particular task, and therefore don’t find the depth and challenge in the activity. Whilst variety in tasks is important, and can help students to learn, it’s also important that students work hard in lessons on completing carefully set-up, substantial tasks. Implications for our teaching: - Are we setting tasks that challenge students, and ask them to really get stuck in to the learning? Is there the potential, in every task we set, for students to work hard, push themselves and feel justifiably proud of what they achieve? Sometimes, it’s better to take tasks out of les-sons, in order to provide the time and attention needed to do the re-maining tasks really well. - Are we providing the conditions in which students can work hard and without distraction, eg by using strategies like the C-system, struc-turing group / paired activities carefully and using periods of silent work at times? - Are we planning too many tasks? Are we working too hard, so that the students don’t end up having to? Some tasks and activities that (might!) work: Top 5: ask students to choose a top 5 from a particular topic (eg causes of WW1, factors needed for photosynthesis to occur, rea sons we should act on global warming, characteristics needed of a leader, ways to skin a cat). They need to: List all 5, Explain their top 3, and Justify their top 1 (teaching of explanation / justifica tion needed!) Here’s the answer, what’s the question? Give them an answer, they make a list of possible questions which would result in that answer. Use www.wordle.net to create a word cloud of text from your topic (eg the course syllabus, a relevant website, an online article) - students can then be asked to explain the reasons why some words and ideas are high-frequency, and make links between the words which appear on the cloud. - Get ideas on activities from the Random Learning Event Genera-tor, at www.bit.ly/AGQwn (sample task - Do ‘uses of the apostrophe’ as ‘an abstract impressionist painting) (!) - Speed draw what you learnt last lesson (either in your own subject or wherever they’ve just come from) - Britain’s Hexago-ing Crazy - put key learning points from your topic onto hexagons - students make hexagon maps, annotating them to show the main ideas link together Quiz-Quiz-Trade - always a winner - you are the students prepare cards with a question on one side and the answer on the other. Stu-dents walk around the room, find a partner, high 5, answer their part-ners question, then the cards are traded and off they go again. Reduced Learning Company - students prepare a 30 second piece of drama at the end of the lesson, showing what they’ve learnt.