The learning files are an initiative of the Zambian National CPD Task Team. They are written by and for the Zambian Colleges of Education and deal with topics that concern education in general and education in colleges more specifically. The files give a mixture of literature, good practices, self-testing and tips and tricks to tackle a certain problem. Some guidance and ideas on how to do CPD on this topic are included. In this case: questioning the questions.
Cheryl Anderson
Family and Preventative Medicine, UC San Diego
and
Peter Newbury
Center for Teaching Development, UC San Diego
teachingmethodsinpublichealth.ucsd.edu
This study examines the effects of case-based learning on the web using questioning techniques and reflective thinking to develop critical thinking skills in undergraduate students. The study compares two questioning techniques (Socratic vs 5W1H) and two reflective thinking methods (digital storytelling vs essays). Participants were 120 undergraduate students randomly assigned to one of four treatment groups that varied the questioning technique and reflective thinking method used. The study aims to determine which combination of questioning technique and reflective thinking method best improves students' critical thinking. The results could help ensure technology-based instructional strategies effectively develop learners' advanced knowledge and skills.
TMPH Fa14 Week 5: Alternatives to LecturePeter Newbury
Cheryl Anderson
Family and Preventative Medicine, UC San Diego
and
Peter Newbury
Center for Teaching Development, UC San Diego
teachingmethodsinpublichealth.ucsd.edu
The document is a presentation on developing expertise. It discusses the concept of deliberate practice, which involves setting explicit goals, focusing on the task, getting feedback, and regularly practicing over a long period of time. It notes that expertise takes around 10,000 hours of deliberate practice. The presentation also discusses different levels of mastery from incompetent to expert and unconscious competence. It emphasizes that expertise is developed through practice, not innate talent, and encourages students to engage in deliberate practice to continue improving.
Cheryl Anderson
Family and Preventative Medicine, UC San Diego
and
Peter Newbury
Center for Teaching Development, UC San Diego
teachingmethodsinpublichealth.ucsd.edu
Cheryl Anderson
Family and Preventative Medicine, UC San Diego
and
Peter Newbury
Center for Teaching Development, UC San Diego
teachingmethodsinpublichealth.ucsd.edu
TTMPH Fa14 Week 4: Fixed and Growth Mindset & Assessment that Supports LearningPeter Newbury
Cheryl Anderson
Family and Preventative Medicine, UC San Diego
and
Peter Newbury
Center for Teaching Development, UC San Diego
teachingmethodsinpublichealth.ucsd.edu
This document provides an introduction to differentiated instruction. It discusses norms and objectives for understanding differentiated instruction strategies. Examples are given of learning activities like Think Dots, RAFTS, and the Learning Matrix that incorporate differentiation of content, process, and product based on student readiness, interests, and learning profiles. Strategies like tiering tasks, choice boards, and learning surveys are described to engage students with varied skills and preferences.
Cheryl Anderson
Family and Preventative Medicine, UC San Diego
and
Peter Newbury
Center for Teaching Development, UC San Diego
teachingmethodsinpublichealth.ucsd.edu
This study examines the effects of case-based learning on the web using questioning techniques and reflective thinking to develop critical thinking skills in undergraduate students. The study compares two questioning techniques (Socratic vs 5W1H) and two reflective thinking methods (digital storytelling vs essays). Participants were 120 undergraduate students randomly assigned to one of four treatment groups that varied the questioning technique and reflective thinking method used. The study aims to determine which combination of questioning technique and reflective thinking method best improves students' critical thinking. The results could help ensure technology-based instructional strategies effectively develop learners' advanced knowledge and skills.
TMPH Fa14 Week 5: Alternatives to LecturePeter Newbury
Cheryl Anderson
Family and Preventative Medicine, UC San Diego
and
Peter Newbury
Center for Teaching Development, UC San Diego
teachingmethodsinpublichealth.ucsd.edu
The document is a presentation on developing expertise. It discusses the concept of deliberate practice, which involves setting explicit goals, focusing on the task, getting feedback, and regularly practicing over a long period of time. It notes that expertise takes around 10,000 hours of deliberate practice. The presentation also discusses different levels of mastery from incompetent to expert and unconscious competence. It emphasizes that expertise is developed through practice, not innate talent, and encourages students to engage in deliberate practice to continue improving.
Cheryl Anderson
Family and Preventative Medicine, UC San Diego
and
Peter Newbury
Center for Teaching Development, UC San Diego
teachingmethodsinpublichealth.ucsd.edu
Cheryl Anderson
Family and Preventative Medicine, UC San Diego
and
Peter Newbury
Center for Teaching Development, UC San Diego
teachingmethodsinpublichealth.ucsd.edu
TTMPH Fa14 Week 4: Fixed and Growth Mindset & Assessment that Supports LearningPeter Newbury
Cheryl Anderson
Family and Preventative Medicine, UC San Diego
and
Peter Newbury
Center for Teaching Development, UC San Diego
teachingmethodsinpublichealth.ucsd.edu
This document provides an introduction to differentiated instruction. It discusses norms and objectives for understanding differentiated instruction strategies. Examples are given of learning activities like Think Dots, RAFTS, and the Learning Matrix that incorporate differentiation of content, process, and product based on student readiness, interests, and learning profiles. Strategies like tiering tasks, choice boards, and learning surveys are described to engage students with varied skills and preferences.
CU Berkeley Workshop #1: Writing Great Clicker QuestionsStephanie Chasteen
How does a teacher use questioning effectively? This workshop will focus on writing those questions that engage students, spark their curiosity, help recap material, give you insight into their thinking, or help them learn critical ideas in your discipline. We will focus on the use of clickers with "peer instruction" -- a research-tested method of requiring students to discuss challenging questions with one another. We will discuss how clickers can help facilitate this teaching strategy, investigate the surprising power of multiple-choice questions to achieve critical thinking skills, plus spend time discussing the elements of effective questions and practicing writing and improving questions for our classes.
Using literacy levels to differentiate by readinessJeremy
The document provides guidance on differentiating instruction for students based on their reading readiness levels. It discusses assessing students' literacy levels, placing them into readiness groups, and creating tiered activities tailored to each group's level. Teachers are encouraged to use flexible grouping and provide small group instruction. Examples are given for how to structure tiered assignments and assess students at different levels based on shared learning objectives.
Using literacy levels to differentiate by readiness final editJeremy
The document discusses differentiating instruction for students based on their readiness levels. It defines readiness and explains that differentiation by readiness challenges all learners by making work slightly difficult to promote growth. The document provides strategies for differentiation by readiness, including determining student readiness using assessments, flexible grouping, tiering assignments, and using small group instruction. Teachers are encouraged to use readiness data to match instruction to student needs.
This document contains a rubric for evaluating WebQuests with categories for aesthetics, introduction, task, process, evaluation, conclusion, and credits. Key areas of focus include navigation, clarity of objectives, depth of thinking, connection to curriculum standards, appropriateness for grade level, clear directions, and meaningful resources. Points are assigned on a scale from low to high in each category to assess the overall quality of the WebQuest.
This document summarizes a webquest activity for students to research Abraham Lincoln in groups. Students will be assigned a time period of Lincoln's life and complete worksheets and a presentation. They will use approved websites for research and develop skills like critical thinking, teamwork, and compromise. The teacher will assess students on content knowledge, computer use, delegation of work, organization, and writing. The goal is for students to learn about Lincoln and develop 21st century skills through group research and presentations.
The document discusses essential questions and strategies for developing them. Essential questions require higher-order thinking like evaluation, synthesis, and analysis. They have no definite answers, spark curiosity, and promote deeper understanding over time. Effective essential questions engage students in real-world problem solving across disciplines and get at the heart of a subject. Teachers can help students learn by modeling question-framing and providing tools to guide inquiry.
How people learn, exploring the key findings from Chapter 1 of "How People Learn." Plus, implications for teaching including peer instruction. A weekly workshop by the Center for Teaching Development at UCSD.
The rubric evaluates project design based on whether it incorporates best practices of project-based learning. It assesses features such as the driving question, student voice, collaboration, critical thinking, formative assessment, and duration. A well-designed project according to the rubric has an academically rigorous inquiry, authentic work, opportunities for student choice and independence, targeted 21st century skill development, aligned assessments, and an appropriate timeframe.
CU Berkeley Workshop #2: Making it work, Effective Facilitation of Clicker Q...Stephanie Chasteen
So now you’ve got some great questions to use with clickers, but that’s no magic bullet. What might go wrong, and how do we avoid common pitfalls? How do we avoid just giving students the answer, or what if students are reluctant to discuss the questions? In this interactive workshop, we’ll explore research-based tips and ideas for questioning in a way that allow us to achieve the full benefit of clickers and peer instruction. We’ll discuss common challenges, share tips on getting students to productively argue and reason through the questions, and ways to encourage all students to speak up in response to questions. Time-depending, participants will also get a chance to practice aspects of teaching through questioning.
Backwards Design & Melding In-Class and Online PedagogiesAndy Saltarelli
This document summarizes a presentation on melding in-class and online pedagogies. The presenters are from Virtual University Design and Technology at Michigan State University. They discuss their philosophy of starting with authentic pedagogical problems rather than technological solutions. They emphasize backwards design, identifying big ideas and essential questions, and connecting concepts. The presentation provides examples and templates for developing big ideas and concept maps for a course. Attendees are guided through an activity to create a draft concept map for one of their courses. Various low- and web-based tools for concept mapping are also introduced.
This document provides information about a group project on Abraham Lincoln that students will complete. Students will be split into groups and assigned a time period of Lincoln's life to research. They will use approved websites to fill out a worksheet and create a PowerPoint presentation. Following group presentations, there will be a quiz. The project aims to develop 21st century skills and teach students about appropriate internet use and creating presentations.
Lisa Rubenstein, Ph.D. from Ball State University, presented on flipped classrooms. She began by defining flipped classrooms as inverting traditional classroom structure by delivering instructional content, often via video, outside of the classroom and moving "homework" into the classroom through strategies such as problem-solving. She then discussed four pillars of flipped learning: flexible environments, shifting learning culture, intentional content, and professional educators. Rubenstein also addressed possible benefits of flipped classrooms like increased student control over pacing and the ability to differentiate instruction. She concluded by emphasizing the importance of designing flipped classrooms based on sound educational practices.
This document discusses Depth of Knowledge (DOK) and how it can be applied in the classroom. DOK refers to the cognitive demand or rigor required to correctly answer test questions or complete classroom activities. There are 4 levels of DOK, with higher levels requiring greater conceptual understanding and cognitive processing from students. The document provides examples of classroom activities and assessments at each DOK level for various subjects. It also discusses how teachers can help students develop higher-order thinking skills through strategies like think-alouds, where teachers model their thinking process for students.
To help students generate and test hypotheses about new knowledge, the document outlines seven action steps:
1. Teach students how to effectively support hypotheses through frameworks, common errors in thinking, and quantitative data analysis.
2. Engage students in experimental inquiry tasks requiring prediction testing through data collection and analysis.
3. Use problem-solving tasks in unusual contexts requiring hypothesis generation and examination of existing strategies.
4. Require decision-making among appealing alternatives and generation of evaluation criteria.
5. Design historical, definitional, or projective investigation tasks with initial predictions and information seeking.
6. Have students design their own tasks to further examine topics of interest.
7. Consider using
1. Direct instruction involves explicit explanations from the teacher in a structured format. It is effective for new subjects, facts, or low-achieving students but can be boring and rely heavily on the teacher.
2. Discussion allows students to consider different ideas and perspectives through questioning and arguing. It enhances knowledge and skills but may stray off topic if not properly structured and facilitated by the teacher.
3. Small group work allows students to collaborate in solving problems or examining topics. It enhances social and communication skills but the workload must be evenly distributed to avoid some students dominating or not participating.
Intended Outcomes:
identify the PALSI scheme's intended outcomes and adjust their expectation
identify the demand and expectation of university learning
explain the importance of active and reflective learning
describe how learning skills, will and self regulation interplay with each other and affect learning outcomes
develop appropriate expectation and attitude for peer assisted learning
Activities:
Lecture
Past PALSI Students & Leaders experience sharing
This document provides instructions for a group project on Abraham Lincoln. Students will be split into groups and assigned a time period of Lincoln's life to research. Each group will use approved websites to gather information and fill out a worksheet. Groups will then present their findings in a 5 minute PowerPoint presentation. Following the presentations, there will be a quiz over Lincoln's life. The document outlines the project steps and provides evaluation criteria for assessing students' work.
ClassPal : An interactive Doubt clearance portal | Aug 2012 - January 2013
Done under the course in Interaction Design, developed an Interactive doubt posting/clearance
portal to enhance the learning experience for a lecture based classroom. Applied a User-centered
approach to come up with a system for the classroom and interface for individual student. The project
has been selected for publication in the journal Design for All, March ‘13 issue.
The document discusses ten trends in education: assessment for learning, literacy and numeracy, positive psychology, data and student progress, scientific management, outdoor education, parental engagement, enterprise education, professional development, and scholarship. It then provides more detail on assessment for learning, outlining its key factors that improve learning through assessment: the curriculum, assessment, differentiation, and evaluation.
INNOVATIVE TECHNIQUES IN THE CLASSROOM-DR.DEEPIKA KOHLIDeepikakohli10
Dr. Deepika Kohli presented innovative techniques for engaging diverse learners in the classroom. Some of the techniques discussed included spaced learning, flipping the classroom, mind mapping, argumentation, micro-e-learning, peer learning, collaborative learning, and blended learning. These techniques encourage students to learn through a variety of interactive and participatory methods rather than passive lecturing alone. The goal is to keep students engaged with the material in a way that works for different learning styles and abilities.
Our new issue of tEach and learn is ready for reading. Have a look at what happened from May till August 2011 in the MOE-VVOB teacher training support programme.
The learning files are an initiative of the Zambian National CPD Task Team. They are written by and for the Zambian Colleges of Education and deal with topics that concern education in general and education in colleges more specifically. The files give a mixture of literature, good practices, self-testing and tips and tricks to tackle a certain problem. Some guidance and ideas on how to do CPD on this topic are included. In this case: consulting students.
CU Berkeley Workshop #1: Writing Great Clicker QuestionsStephanie Chasteen
How does a teacher use questioning effectively? This workshop will focus on writing those questions that engage students, spark their curiosity, help recap material, give you insight into their thinking, or help them learn critical ideas in your discipline. We will focus on the use of clickers with "peer instruction" -- a research-tested method of requiring students to discuss challenging questions with one another. We will discuss how clickers can help facilitate this teaching strategy, investigate the surprising power of multiple-choice questions to achieve critical thinking skills, plus spend time discussing the elements of effective questions and practicing writing and improving questions for our classes.
Using literacy levels to differentiate by readinessJeremy
The document provides guidance on differentiating instruction for students based on their reading readiness levels. It discusses assessing students' literacy levels, placing them into readiness groups, and creating tiered activities tailored to each group's level. Teachers are encouraged to use flexible grouping and provide small group instruction. Examples are given for how to structure tiered assignments and assess students at different levels based on shared learning objectives.
Using literacy levels to differentiate by readiness final editJeremy
The document discusses differentiating instruction for students based on their readiness levels. It defines readiness and explains that differentiation by readiness challenges all learners by making work slightly difficult to promote growth. The document provides strategies for differentiation by readiness, including determining student readiness using assessments, flexible grouping, tiering assignments, and using small group instruction. Teachers are encouraged to use readiness data to match instruction to student needs.
This document contains a rubric for evaluating WebQuests with categories for aesthetics, introduction, task, process, evaluation, conclusion, and credits. Key areas of focus include navigation, clarity of objectives, depth of thinking, connection to curriculum standards, appropriateness for grade level, clear directions, and meaningful resources. Points are assigned on a scale from low to high in each category to assess the overall quality of the WebQuest.
This document summarizes a webquest activity for students to research Abraham Lincoln in groups. Students will be assigned a time period of Lincoln's life and complete worksheets and a presentation. They will use approved websites for research and develop skills like critical thinking, teamwork, and compromise. The teacher will assess students on content knowledge, computer use, delegation of work, organization, and writing. The goal is for students to learn about Lincoln and develop 21st century skills through group research and presentations.
The document discusses essential questions and strategies for developing them. Essential questions require higher-order thinking like evaluation, synthesis, and analysis. They have no definite answers, spark curiosity, and promote deeper understanding over time. Effective essential questions engage students in real-world problem solving across disciplines and get at the heart of a subject. Teachers can help students learn by modeling question-framing and providing tools to guide inquiry.
How people learn, exploring the key findings from Chapter 1 of "How People Learn." Plus, implications for teaching including peer instruction. A weekly workshop by the Center for Teaching Development at UCSD.
The rubric evaluates project design based on whether it incorporates best practices of project-based learning. It assesses features such as the driving question, student voice, collaboration, critical thinking, formative assessment, and duration. A well-designed project according to the rubric has an academically rigorous inquiry, authentic work, opportunities for student choice and independence, targeted 21st century skill development, aligned assessments, and an appropriate timeframe.
CU Berkeley Workshop #2: Making it work, Effective Facilitation of Clicker Q...Stephanie Chasteen
So now you’ve got some great questions to use with clickers, but that’s no magic bullet. What might go wrong, and how do we avoid common pitfalls? How do we avoid just giving students the answer, or what if students are reluctant to discuss the questions? In this interactive workshop, we’ll explore research-based tips and ideas for questioning in a way that allow us to achieve the full benefit of clickers and peer instruction. We’ll discuss common challenges, share tips on getting students to productively argue and reason through the questions, and ways to encourage all students to speak up in response to questions. Time-depending, participants will also get a chance to practice aspects of teaching through questioning.
Backwards Design & Melding In-Class and Online PedagogiesAndy Saltarelli
This document summarizes a presentation on melding in-class and online pedagogies. The presenters are from Virtual University Design and Technology at Michigan State University. They discuss their philosophy of starting with authentic pedagogical problems rather than technological solutions. They emphasize backwards design, identifying big ideas and essential questions, and connecting concepts. The presentation provides examples and templates for developing big ideas and concept maps for a course. Attendees are guided through an activity to create a draft concept map for one of their courses. Various low- and web-based tools for concept mapping are also introduced.
This document provides information about a group project on Abraham Lincoln that students will complete. Students will be split into groups and assigned a time period of Lincoln's life to research. They will use approved websites to fill out a worksheet and create a PowerPoint presentation. Following group presentations, there will be a quiz. The project aims to develop 21st century skills and teach students about appropriate internet use and creating presentations.
Lisa Rubenstein, Ph.D. from Ball State University, presented on flipped classrooms. She began by defining flipped classrooms as inverting traditional classroom structure by delivering instructional content, often via video, outside of the classroom and moving "homework" into the classroom through strategies such as problem-solving. She then discussed four pillars of flipped learning: flexible environments, shifting learning culture, intentional content, and professional educators. Rubenstein also addressed possible benefits of flipped classrooms like increased student control over pacing and the ability to differentiate instruction. She concluded by emphasizing the importance of designing flipped classrooms based on sound educational practices.
This document discusses Depth of Knowledge (DOK) and how it can be applied in the classroom. DOK refers to the cognitive demand or rigor required to correctly answer test questions or complete classroom activities. There are 4 levels of DOK, with higher levels requiring greater conceptual understanding and cognitive processing from students. The document provides examples of classroom activities and assessments at each DOK level for various subjects. It also discusses how teachers can help students develop higher-order thinking skills through strategies like think-alouds, where teachers model their thinking process for students.
To help students generate and test hypotheses about new knowledge, the document outlines seven action steps:
1. Teach students how to effectively support hypotheses through frameworks, common errors in thinking, and quantitative data analysis.
2. Engage students in experimental inquiry tasks requiring prediction testing through data collection and analysis.
3. Use problem-solving tasks in unusual contexts requiring hypothesis generation and examination of existing strategies.
4. Require decision-making among appealing alternatives and generation of evaluation criteria.
5. Design historical, definitional, or projective investigation tasks with initial predictions and information seeking.
6. Have students design their own tasks to further examine topics of interest.
7. Consider using
1. Direct instruction involves explicit explanations from the teacher in a structured format. It is effective for new subjects, facts, or low-achieving students but can be boring and rely heavily on the teacher.
2. Discussion allows students to consider different ideas and perspectives through questioning and arguing. It enhances knowledge and skills but may stray off topic if not properly structured and facilitated by the teacher.
3. Small group work allows students to collaborate in solving problems or examining topics. It enhances social and communication skills but the workload must be evenly distributed to avoid some students dominating or not participating.
Intended Outcomes:
identify the PALSI scheme's intended outcomes and adjust their expectation
identify the demand and expectation of university learning
explain the importance of active and reflective learning
describe how learning skills, will and self regulation interplay with each other and affect learning outcomes
develop appropriate expectation and attitude for peer assisted learning
Activities:
Lecture
Past PALSI Students & Leaders experience sharing
This document provides instructions for a group project on Abraham Lincoln. Students will be split into groups and assigned a time period of Lincoln's life to research. Each group will use approved websites to gather information and fill out a worksheet. Groups will then present their findings in a 5 minute PowerPoint presentation. Following the presentations, there will be a quiz over Lincoln's life. The document outlines the project steps and provides evaluation criteria for assessing students' work.
ClassPal : An interactive Doubt clearance portal | Aug 2012 - January 2013
Done under the course in Interaction Design, developed an Interactive doubt posting/clearance
portal to enhance the learning experience for a lecture based classroom. Applied a User-centered
approach to come up with a system for the classroom and interface for individual student. The project
has been selected for publication in the journal Design for All, March ‘13 issue.
The document discusses ten trends in education: assessment for learning, literacy and numeracy, positive psychology, data and student progress, scientific management, outdoor education, parental engagement, enterprise education, professional development, and scholarship. It then provides more detail on assessment for learning, outlining its key factors that improve learning through assessment: the curriculum, assessment, differentiation, and evaluation.
INNOVATIVE TECHNIQUES IN THE CLASSROOM-DR.DEEPIKA KOHLIDeepikakohli10
Dr. Deepika Kohli presented innovative techniques for engaging diverse learners in the classroom. Some of the techniques discussed included spaced learning, flipping the classroom, mind mapping, argumentation, micro-e-learning, peer learning, collaborative learning, and blended learning. These techniques encourage students to learn through a variety of interactive and participatory methods rather than passive lecturing alone. The goal is to keep students engaged with the material in a way that works for different learning styles and abilities.
Our new issue of tEach and learn is ready for reading. Have a look at what happened from May till August 2011 in the MOE-VVOB teacher training support programme.
The learning files are an initiative of the Zambian National CPD Task Team. They are written by and for the Zambian Colleges of Education and deal with topics that concern education in general and education in colleges more specifically. The files give a mixture of literature, good practices, self-testing and tips and tricks to tackle a certain problem. Some guidance and ideas on how to do CPD on this topic are included. In this case: consulting students.
Lieve Leroy how can grasshoppers change ict practiceslievle
The document discusses using a "grassroots" approach to encourage teachers to adopt new information and communication technologies (ICT) in their classrooms. Key aspects of the grassroots approach include allowing teachers to propose small-scale ICT projects, providing support and guidance during implementation, and disseminating successful projects. The approach has been used successfully in Zambia to motivate teachers with little ICT experience and increase ICT use in education.
Graphic organisers are visual representations that structure information by arranging concepts and relationships. They combine words and visual elements to organize ideas and store information. Graphic organisers help students represent abstract ideas concretely, depict relationships between facts and concepts, and recall information. Mrs. Bwalya from Mimosa College of Education had her students create mind maps and compare charts on learning theories to actively engage them and promote higher-level thinking. She found graphic organisers helped students of all abilities better understand lessons by visually representing information.
Artificial intelligence (AI) is everywhere, promising self-driving cars, medical breakthroughs, and new ways of working. But how do you separate hype from reality? How can your company apply AI to solve real business problems?
Here’s what AI learnings your business should keep in mind for 2017.
Study: The Future of VR, AR and Self-Driving CarsLinkedIn
We asked LinkedIn members worldwide about their levels of interest in the latest wave of technology: whether they’re using wearables, and whether they intend to buy self-driving cars and VR headsets as they become available. We asked them too about their attitudes to technology and to the growing role of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in the devices that they use. The answers were fascinating – and in many cases, surprising.
This SlideShare explores the full results of this study, including detailed market-by-market breakdowns of intention levels for each technology – and how attitudes change with age, location and seniority level. If you’re marketing a tech brand – or planning to use VR and wearables to reach a professional audience – then these are insights you won’t want to miss.
The document discusses what constitutes a good research problem and provides examples. It defines a research problem as an area of concern researchers want to investigate in order to improve a condition, answer a question, or seek solutions. Good research problems are feasible, clear, significant, and ethical. They investigate relationships between variables and can be studied by collecting and analyzing data rather than posing philosophical or value-based questions. The document emphasizes defining key terms to ensure questions are unambiguous.
The document discusses effective questioning techniques for teachers, including asking open-ended, divergent, and higher-order thinking questions; providing sufficient wait time for students to think; and improving questioning skills through self-evaluation and critique. It also covers encouraging student questioning by modeling good questioning, attending to students' questions, and praising correctly formulated inquiries.
1. Effective questioning involves asking a variety of questions at different cognitive levels, including convergent, divergent, and evaluative questions. Teachers should aim to ask both lower-level and higher-level questions.
2. Important questioning skills for teachers include varying question types, not directing questions to specific students, calling on non-volunteers, rephrasing questions if needed, sequencing questions logically, and allowing sufficient wait time after asking a question.
3. Teachers can improve their questioning techniques by reflecting on the types of questions they typically ask, getting feedback from colleagues, increasing their repertoire of question types, considering students' abilities and interests, and spending time to improve the questions they ask.
The document discusses using technology to support student learning. It outlines several principles of good teaching practice, including encouraging student-staff contact, active learning, and high expectations. It also discusses various technologies that can impact student learning, such as clickers, blogs, wikis, and peer/self-assessment tools. Turnitin software is mentioned as a way to help identify plagiarism.
This document provides an overview of inquiry-based learning. It defines inquiry-based learning as a process where students investigate questions and form new understandings through active involvement. The document outlines the inquiry process, highlighting that it is non-linear and involves planning, retrieving information, processing data, creating, sharing, and evaluating understandings. Reflection is emphasized as integral to learning and developing metacognition. Effective implementation involves establishing a common language, modeling inquiry behaviors, and using formative and summative assessments to support student growth.
1. How can you determine if two fractions with unlike denominators can be added or require a common denominator? Explain your reasoning.
2. You are given the fractions 3/4 and 5/8. Show the step-by-step work to add these fractions using a common denominator. Explain how using a common denominator allows you to add the fractions.
3. Juan claims he can simply add the numerators and denominators when adding fractions. For example, he would calculate 3/4 + 5/8 as 8/12. Explain why Juan's method is incorrect and why using a common denominator is
The document discusses several cases related to teaching for understanding:
1. A teacher chooses To Kill a Mockingbird and plans cooperative group work and an essay assessment.
2. A student teacher asks students an open-ended question that gets no response, showing a lack of understanding.
3. A student compares Catcher in the Rye to Bill and Ted in their essay, rather than discussing the novel's big ideas.
It emphasizes the importance of essential questions that promote inquiry, transfer of learning, and understanding of big ideas rather than simple coverage of content.
Active learning(jigsaw method)1 mergedshaziazamir1
state the meaning of active learning
explain the need for active learning
discuss Principles of active learning
define characteristics of active learning
1. The document discusses using a developmental perspective to understand powerful learning and addresses the challenges students face in developing more complex ways of thinking.
2. It presents William Perry's scheme of intellectual and ethical development as a framework for understanding students' differing perspectives on knowledge and learning.
3. The scheme shows that students progress through qualitatively different conceptions of knowledge from dualistic to relativistic thinking, which has implications for designing learning environments that balance challenge and support.
Classroom Instruction That Works Group Presentmalexana
The document summarizes key points from the book "Classroom Instruction that Works" regarding instructional strategies that increase student achievement. It discusses 9 categories of instruction found to impact achievement, including identifying similarities and differences, summarizing and note-taking, reinforcing effort and providing recognition, homework and practice, non-linguistic representations, cooperative learning, setting objectives and providing feedback, generating and testing hypotheses, and questions, cues, and advanced organizers. Examples and research findings are provided for each category. The conclusion encourages teachers to consider what strategies are practical and applicable for their unique classroom environments.
Handouts from the presentation by Dr. Linda Rush on the topic of Challening the advanced learner given as part of the ADIBF Academy Certificate Future Proof Teacher 2015.
As a teacher, headteacher, university academic, educational consultant and researcher Dr Linda Rush worked with a wide range of learners in a wide variety of contexts. Her research in the areas of teacher education and public / private partnerships has led to presentation at international conferences and publication in books and journals. More recently in her role as Director of Teacher Training for GEMS Education, a vital part for her is to explore the concept of a ‘global’ and ‘state of the art’ UAE based Teacher Training Institute. The overarching intention of the Institute will be to change the way teacher education meets the future; to foster interdisciplinary, integrated thinking and innovative leadership; to engage fully in the global community; and to facilitate lifelong learning. To this end, GEMS Education is looking to working with national and international outstanding universities to develop challenging programmes of global teacher education.
What is thinking & higher order thinking?
How to improve higher order thinking?
Why do we ask questions?
Principles of questioning
Strategies to use when student respond?
Strategies to use when student don’t respond
Strategies for responding to student questions
The document discusses 22 formative assessment techniques that teachers can use to evaluate student learning in the classroom. The techniques are simple to administer and provide teachers with evidence of student understanding to help adjust lesson plans. They also help students understand where they need to focus their efforts. Some of the techniques discussed include using popsicle sticks to call on random students, exit tickets where students submit answers before leaving class, using whiteboards for students to show answers, and think-pair-share activities.
Just in time teaching a 21st century brain-based technique - jeff loats - l...Jeff Loats
Just in Time Teaching (JiTT) is a technique that uses online pre-class assignments called "WarmUps" to promote student preparation and engagement. Students answer conceptual questions about upcoming material before class. Instructors review responses to modify lessons and discussions accordingly. Research shows JiTT improves student preparation, attendance, and learning across disciplines from physics to art history. While the initial time investment is large, JiTT addresses brain-based learning principles in ways traditional lectures often neglect. Students report WarmUps make them better prepared and help them learn.
To those who would like to have a copy of this slide, just email me at martzmonette@yahoo.com and please tell me why would you want this presentation. Thank you very much and GOD BLESS YOU
A four-year-old asks on average about 400 questions per day, and an adult generally asks much much less. Our school system is often structured around rewarding giving the "right" answer and not asking smart questions. The result over time is that, as we grow older, we stop asking questions. Yet asking good questions is essential to finding and developing solutions - an important skill in critical thinking, innovation, and leadership.
This workshop will support teachers to explore their current habits and practices of formulating and asking questions, discuss with their colleagues a range of practices from research and articles, and then develop some new practical approaches they can use with their students.
This document outlines the agenda for a graduate teaching assistant's class on creating an effective learning environment. The agenda includes reviewing motivation theories and classroom management strategies, having students brainstorm rules and expectations, and engaging them in decision making and problem solving activities related to instructional challenges. Students are prompted to consider how they can relate lesson content to their students' lives and accommodate different achievement levels. The document provides information on concepts like operant conditioning, cognitive development, problem solving versus decision making, and using artifacts to demonstrate knowledge.
Similar to 20110816 learning files questioning the questions (20)
Walmart Business+ and Spark Good for Nonprofits.pdfTechSoup
"Learn about all the ways Walmart supports nonprofit organizations.
You will hear from Liz Willett, the Head of Nonprofits, and hear about what Walmart is doing to help nonprofits, including Walmart Business and Spark Good. Walmart Business+ is a new offer for nonprofits that offers discounts and also streamlines nonprofits order and expense tracking, saving time and money.
The webinar may also give some examples on how nonprofits can best leverage Walmart Business+.
The event will cover the following::
Walmart Business + (https://business.walmart.com/plus) is a new shopping experience for nonprofits, schools, and local business customers that connects an exclusive online shopping experience to stores. Benefits include free delivery and shipping, a 'Spend Analytics” feature, special discounts, deals and tax-exempt shopping.
Special TechSoup offer for a free 180 days membership, and up to $150 in discounts on eligible orders.
Spark Good (walmart.com/sparkgood) is a charitable platform that enables nonprofits to receive donations directly from customers and associates.
Answers about how you can do more with Walmart!"
हिंदी वर्णमाला पीपीटी, hindi alphabet PPT presentation, hindi varnamala PPT, Hindi Varnamala pdf, हिंदी स्वर, हिंदी व्यंजन, sikhiye hindi varnmala, dr. mulla adam ali, hindi language and literature, hindi alphabet with drawing, hindi alphabet pdf, hindi varnamala for childrens, hindi language, hindi varnamala practice for kids, https://www.drmullaadamali.com
Communicating effectively and consistently with students can help them feel at ease during their learning experience and provide the instructor with a communication trail to track the course's progress. This workshop will take you through constructing an engaging course container to facilitate effective communication.
Gender and Mental Health - Counselling and Family Therapy Applications and In...PsychoTech Services
A proprietary approach developed by bringing together the best of learning theories from Psychology, design principles from the world of visualization, and pedagogical methods from over a decade of training experience, that enables you to: Learn better, faster!
Main Java[All of the Base Concepts}.docxadhitya5119
This is part 1 of my Java Learning Journey. This Contains Custom methods, classes, constructors, packages, multithreading , try- catch block, finally block and more.
ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 42001, and GDPR: Best Practices for Implementation and...PECB
Denis is a dynamic and results-driven Chief Information Officer (CIO) with a distinguished career spanning information systems analysis and technical project management. With a proven track record of spearheading the design and delivery of cutting-edge Information Management solutions, he has consistently elevated business operations, streamlined reporting functions, and maximized process efficiency.
Certified as an ISO/IEC 27001: Information Security Management Systems (ISMS) Lead Implementer, Data Protection Officer, and Cyber Risks Analyst, Denis brings a heightened focus on data security, privacy, and cyber resilience to every endeavor.
His expertise extends across a diverse spectrum of reporting, database, and web development applications, underpinned by an exceptional grasp of data storage and virtualization technologies. His proficiency in application testing, database administration, and data cleansing ensures seamless execution of complex projects.
What sets Denis apart is his comprehensive understanding of Business and Systems Analysis technologies, honed through involvement in all phases of the Software Development Lifecycle (SDLC). From meticulous requirements gathering to precise analysis, innovative design, rigorous development, thorough testing, and successful implementation, he has consistently delivered exceptional results.
Throughout his career, he has taken on multifaceted roles, from leading technical project management teams to owning solutions that drive operational excellence. His conscientious and proactive approach is unwavering, whether he is working independently or collaboratively within a team. His ability to connect with colleagues on a personal level underscores his commitment to fostering a harmonious and productive workplace environment.
Date: May 29, 2024
Tags: Information Security, ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 42001, Artificial Intelligence, GDPR
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Find out more about ISO training and certification services
Training: ISO/IEC 27001 Information Security Management System - EN | PECB
ISO/IEC 42001 Artificial Intelligence Management System - EN | PECB
General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) - Training Courses - EN | PECB
Webinars: https://pecb.com/webinars
Article: https://pecb.com/article
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For more information about PECB:
Website: https://pecb.com/
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/pecb/
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/PECBInternational/
Slideshare: http://www.slideshare.net/PECBCERTIFICATION
Philippine Edukasyong Pantahanan at Pangkabuhayan (EPP) CurriculumMJDuyan
(𝐓𝐋𝐄 𝟏𝟎𝟎) (𝐋𝐞𝐬𝐬𝐨𝐧 𝟏)-𝐏𝐫𝐞𝐥𝐢𝐦𝐬
𝐃𝐢𝐬𝐜𝐮𝐬𝐬 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐄𝐏𝐏 𝐂𝐮𝐫𝐫𝐢𝐜𝐮𝐥𝐮𝐦 𝐢𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐏𝐡𝐢𝐥𝐢𝐩𝐩𝐢𝐧𝐞𝐬:
- Understand the goals and objectives of the Edukasyong Pantahanan at Pangkabuhayan (EPP) curriculum, recognizing its importance in fostering practical life skills and values among students. Students will also be able to identify the key components and subjects covered, such as agriculture, home economics, industrial arts, and information and communication technology.
𝐄𝐱𝐩𝐥𝐚𝐢𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐍𝐚𝐭𝐮𝐫𝐞 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐒𝐜𝐨𝐩𝐞 𝐨𝐟 𝐚𝐧 𝐄𝐧𝐭𝐫𝐞𝐩𝐫𝐞𝐧𝐞𝐮𝐫:
-Define entrepreneurship, distinguishing it from general business activities by emphasizing its focus on innovation, risk-taking, and value creation. Students will describe the characteristics and traits of successful entrepreneurs, including their roles and responsibilities, and discuss the broader economic and social impacts of entrepreneurial activities on both local and global scales.
Chapter wise All Notes of First year Basic Civil Engineering.pptxDenish Jangid
Chapter wise All Notes of First year Basic Civil Engineering
Syllabus
Chapter-1
Introduction to objective, scope and outcome the subject
Chapter 2
Introduction: Scope and Specialization of Civil Engineering, Role of civil Engineer in Society, Impact of infrastructural development on economy of country.
Chapter 3
Surveying: Object Principles & Types of Surveying; Site Plans, Plans & Maps; Scales & Unit of different Measurements.
Linear Measurements: Instruments used. Linear Measurement by Tape, Ranging out Survey Lines and overcoming Obstructions; Measurements on sloping ground; Tape corrections, conventional symbols. Angular Measurements: Instruments used; Introduction to Compass Surveying, Bearings and Longitude & Latitude of a Line, Introduction to total station.
Levelling: Instrument used Object of levelling, Methods of levelling in brief, and Contour maps.
Chapter 4
Buildings: Selection of site for Buildings, Layout of Building Plan, Types of buildings, Plinth area, carpet area, floor space index, Introduction to building byelaws, concept of sun light & ventilation. Components of Buildings & their functions, Basic concept of R.C.C., Introduction to types of foundation
Chapter 5
Transportation: Introduction to Transportation Engineering; Traffic and Road Safety: Types and Characteristics of Various Modes of Transportation; Various Road Traffic Signs, Causes of Accidents and Road Safety Measures.
Chapter 6
Environmental Engineering: Environmental Pollution, Environmental Acts and Regulations, Functional Concepts of Ecology, Basics of Species, Biodiversity, Ecosystem, Hydrological Cycle; Chemical Cycles: Carbon, Nitrogen & Phosphorus; Energy Flow in Ecosystems.
Water Pollution: Water Quality standards, Introduction to Treatment & Disposal of Waste Water. Reuse and Saving of Water, Rain Water Harvesting. Solid Waste Management: Classification of Solid Waste, Collection, Transportation and Disposal of Solid. Recycling of Solid Waste: Energy Recovery, Sanitary Landfill, On-Site Sanitation. Air & Noise Pollution: Primary and Secondary air pollutants, Harmful effects of Air Pollution, Control of Air Pollution. . Noise Pollution Harmful Effects of noise pollution, control of noise pollution, Global warming & Climate Change, Ozone depletion, Greenhouse effect
Text Books:
1. Palancharmy, Basic Civil Engineering, McGraw Hill publishers.
2. Satheesh Gopi, Basic Civil Engineering, Pearson Publishers.
3. Ketki Rangwala Dalal, Essentials of Civil Engineering, Charotar Publishing House.
4. BCP, Surveying volume 1
Chapter wise All Notes of First year Basic Civil Engineering.pptx
20110816 learning files questioning the questions
1. J U L Y 2 0 1 1
the learning files
QUESTIONING THE QUESTIONS
3 Have you ever questioned the
questions you ask in your class?
Do they lead to the intended out-
the second most used strategy
(after lecturing).
But are we doing the right thing?
this learning file.
Poor responses from students are
often blamed on the lack of under-
comes?
Is it time to question our ques- standing of the students. Howev-
Questions are used as instruction- tions? What can we learn and er, it is crucial to reflect on “You
al cues or as assessment tools. improve? These are some ques- get what you ask for”.
From all teaching methods it is tions which we hope to answer in
Experiment
The learning files are
and research
an initiative of the Na-
tional CPD Task Team. We asked 27 members of staff of a
They are written by Zambian college to write down 5
and for the Colleges of questions they had asked during
Education and deal their last teaching moment. The
with topics that con- lecturers then in pairs evaluated
cern education in gen- their own questions. They identified
eral and education in the level of their questions, using
colleges more specifi- Bloom’s taxonomy. The results
cally. The files give a were an eye opener for all: the
mixture of literature, majority of the questions asked
good practices, self- were related to lower order thinking
testing and tips and skills.
tricks to tackle a cer-
tain problem. In this Research shows that in gen-
Question-
case: eral
ing the ques- • lecturers over-emphasise
factual information
tions. • lecturers ask very few higher-
Do you feel like con- order thinking questions
tributing ideas or top- • lecturers provide too little time
ics, please do not hesi- after asking the question. The wait time between
tate to contact us: student’s answers and the next statement by the
info@vvob.org.zm. teacher is also too short. How do you get the right answers?
The good news is that improving on questioning By asking the right questions, of
techniques has a direct impact on student learning course!
and achievement.
2. Types of questions
What questions should we ask?
We should ask many types of questions. We should ask questions that have one right answer (closed questions), questions that have many
possible answers (open questions), questions that stimulate different levels of thinking, questions about content and definitions and interpre-
tations, questions about processes and procedures and even questions about questions. But most important: we should ask questions that
relate to the intended outcomes of the lesson.
An overview:
1. Questions that promote different kinds of thinking
Do not only ask memory questions but also text-implicit questions; And our students?
inference questions (questions that ask about implied meaning);
interpretation questions (asking the students to paraphrase text in It is one thing to ask the right ques ons as a lecturer. But do
their own words); transfer questions (apply the same in another you give you students also chances to ask ques ons? Do you
context); hypothesis questions; evaluative questions (make judge-
help them ask the right ques ons? Do you s mulate them
ments); reflective questions (make students think about their think- asking ques ons in your class? If they will have to ask good
ing). See also page 4 of this learning file for Bloom’s taxonomy.
ques ons when they become teachers, then they must be
given a good model by you and the chance to ask many ques‐
2. Deep versus surface questions ons.
Surface learning refers to learning that involves 1 idea or some ide-
as (e.g. What is…? What events led to Zambian independence?)
Deep learning refers to relations between ideas and extending ideas
(e.g. How does … affect…? What would happen if…?).
3. Open and closed questions The orange is a citrus fruit.
Closed questions are factual and focus on a correct response. They The orange is a …?
can be simple (e.g. Who was the first president of Zambia?) but also
complex (e.g. How did character b show his disappointment?).
Open questions have several correct answers (e.g. How would you
approach this problem?). They tend to demand higher order thinking
skills.
4. Essential and guiding questions
Essential questions are universal questions that have no definite
answers (e.g. Is time a cultural concept?). Figure 1: This popular type of question doesn’t lead to any learning
Guiding questions are more specific and are sometimes called
“curriculum” questions (e.g. How many seconds are there in an
hour?).
Socratic questioning: http://
www.youtube.com/watch?
5. Questions that clarify students’ values
v=2QSXvpbyZeM&feature=related
These questions help students reflect on who they are, where they
are going, how they are approaching work and tasks, what are their Open and closed questions: http://
moral standards, their ideas about gender, equity, etc.… (e.g. Will www.youtube.com/watch?
you consider a possible alternative? Do you believe women can do v=WfKlVPC9uuA
this job? How will this affect you in future?)
PAGE 2
3. Tips and tricks
How to get
enhance the analytic and
problem-solving skills of
students by allowing
“To reach higher or-
started? sufficient wait times be-
fore responding, both
der thinking skills
you need to prepare
after posing a question
and after the answer is
1. Prepare your students for extensive questioning. Lectur- given. This allows every- the questions in ad-
ers who use lots of questions in a classroom might create the im- one to think about not
only the question but also
vance”
pression that they are evaluating the students. Students need to
know that questions seek clarification and elaboration of students' the response provided by
ideas in order to make their thinking visible, and to help the teacher the student. Three to five seconds in most cases; longer in some,
address misconceptions. maybe up to 10 seconds for higher-order questions.
8. Select both volunteers and non-volunteers to answer
2. Use both pre-planned and emerging questions. Prepare
questions. Female students frequently take longer to respond; give
your questions, based on the desired outcomes of the lesson. Re-
them adequate time to do so. Picking on the student who is first to
search shows that when questions are not prepared , they tend to
raise his or her hand will often leave many students uninvolved in
relate more to lower order thinking skills. Questions derived from
the discussion. Some teachers use a randomized approach where
the discussion/lesson itself can help guide the discussion.
they pick student names from a hat, so to speak. This ensures equi-
table participation, and keeps students intellectually engaged.
3. Use a wide variety of questions. Use a variety of open and
closed questions. Make sure you address higher and lower order 9. Engage all. Use activities such as think-pair-share, think-write-
thinking skills. Use Bloom's Taxonomy. Avoid yes and no questions
pair-share, entrance and exit slips and personal white boards or
because they tend not to trigger a lot of thinking before answering.
slate to make sure that all students are answering.
4. Avoid the use of rhetorical questions. Rhetorical ques-
12. Maintain a positive class atmosphere. Not all students
tions are those to which answers are already known, or merely seek
will be completely clear in their thinking or enunciation and, invaria-
affirmation of something stated previously such as the following:
bly, some won't be paying attention. Nevertheless, avoid the use of
Right?, Don't you?, Correct?, Okay?, and Yes? More often than not,
sarcasm, unreasonable reprimands, accusations, and personal
rhetorical questions are unintentional, and are suggestive of habit or
attacks.
nervousness.
13. Interrelate previous comments. As the discussion moves
5. State questions with precision. Poor wording and the use of
along, be certain to interrelate previous student comments in an
rapid-fire, multiple questions related to the same topic can result in
effort to draw a conclusion. Avoid doing the work of arriving at a
confusion. Easy does it. Repeat the question, and explain it in other
conclusion for your student.
words if students don't seem to understand. One question at a time
or else students won't know how to respond.
14. Equitably select students. Remember that males have a
tendency to "jump up and shout out" responses whereas females
6. Pose whole-group questions unless seeking clarifica-
tend to be more
tion. Direct questions to the entire class. Handle incomplete or
circumspect and,
unclear responses by reinforcing what is correct and then asking
therefore, de- “The quality of answers
follow-up questions. Ask for additional details, seek clarification of
the answer, or ask the student to justify a response. Redirect the
layed in respond-
ing. Control situ-
in my class improved
question to the whole group of the desired response is not obtained.
ations where drastically once I started
inequitable re-
7. Use appropriate wait time. Wait time encourages all students sponding is likely giving students more
to think about the response, as they do not know who is going to be to occur.
called upon to answer the question. The teacher can significantly time to think”
PAGE 3
4. Bloom’s taxonomy
Benjamin Bloom is known for his taxonomy which describes levels
in learning. The (revised) taxonomy can help us develop the right
questions which lead to higher order thinking
skills. The discussion whether we prefer the
original or the revised taxonomy is not rele- Can
Bloom
vant here. Crucial is that we reflect on whe-
ther we give our students enough opportuni-
ties to develop their higher order thinking
skills.
On these pages you will find for each level
help us?
some verbs that typically belong to this level,
guiding questions and some examples of questions set in a Zambi-
an context.
Remembering Remembering previously learned
material
Verbs Questions Examples
Label What do you remember about…? Name all Zambian provinces and their capitals.
List How would you define…? What crops are grown in Eastern Province?
Name How would you recognise…? How many vowels does Nyanja have?
State What would you choose…? State the formula for the area of a circle.
Outline Describe what happens when…?
Define How is…? Develop your own:
Locate Which one…? • …
Repeat Why did ….? • …
Identify
...
Recite
Understanding Grasping the meaning of material
Verbs Questions Examples
Discuss How would you clarify the meaning …? Who was the key character in Zambia’s independ-
Explain How would you differentiate between …? ence?
Observe What did you observe …? What is the difference between socialists and com-
Diagram How would you identify …? munists?
demonstrate What would happen if …? Explain the formula for the area of a circle in your own
Answer who, what, when, Can you give an example of …? words.
where,why questions
Illustrate ... Develop your own:
Define in your own words
• …
... • ...
PAGE 4
5. Applying Using information in concrete
situations
Verbs Questions Examples
Report How would you develop… to present…? Compute the area of the round square in front of the
Construct What would be the result if …? administration building
Solve How would you present …? Identify all forms of punishment you have observed in
Illustrate How would you change…? the video recording of a lesson taught in Gr3.
Exhibit Why does … work? Identify examples of metaphors in this poem.
Modify Can you develop a set of instructions about..? NOTE: a student writing “15” next to “3 times 5 equals”
Design What factors would you change if …? is not applying but remembering/understanding.
Develop
Use ... Develop your own:
... • …
• …
Breaking down material into parts
Analysing and understanding their
relationship to the whole
Verbs Questions Examples
Sort How can you classify … according to ….? What strategies do you need to solve this math word
Analyse How can you compare the different parts …? problem?
Investigate What explanation do you have for …? Listen to the speech of the president: distinguish facts
Classify Discuss the pros and cons of …? and opinions.
Survey What is the analysis of …? Compare the major differences in the economic poli-
Debate How is … similar to …? cies of President Kaunda and President Chiluba.
Graph …
Compare
Contrast Develop your own:
Distinguish • …
...
• …
Judging the value of a product for
Evaluating a given purpose, using definite
criteria
Verbs Questions Examples
Justify What criteria could you use to assess …? Write a review for the novel you have read and specify
Self evaluate What data was used to evaluate …? the type of audience that would enjoy this.
Conclude What choice would you have made…? Observe another teacher (or yourself) and determine
test What is the most important…? the quality of the teaching performance in terms of the
Group discussion How could you verify …? teacher's appropriate application of questioning tech-
Justify Is there a better solution to…? niques.
Judge What do you think about…? After solving the math problem, determine the degree
Criticise Do you think this is a bad or a good thing? to which that problem was solved as efficiently as pos-
Appraise … sible
5
Recommend
PAGE
... Develop your own:
• …
6. Creating Putting parts together into a new
(+synthesising) whole
Verbs Questions Examples
Invent What alternative would you suggest for …? How could you re-write this story with a city setting?
establish What changes would you make to revise…? Write an essay or a poem.
Design Predict the outcome if…? Write a set of rules to prevent what happened in this
Formulate What could you invent …? part of Zambian history.
Hypothesize How would you compile the facts for…? Apply the strategies learned in educational psychology
Re-tell differently If you had access to all resources how would in an organised manner to solve this educational prob-
Report you deal with …? lem.
Experiment Compose a song about … Apply and integrate several different strategies to solve
Generate Design a … to … a mathematical problem.
Compose ...
... Develop your own:
• …
• …
The more you deliberately design questions, the easier it gets.
More ideas: http://www.teachers.ash.org.au/researchskills/
dalton.htm
“Judge a man by his questions rather than his answers.”
(Voltaire)
Handling answers
1. Listen carefully to your students as 4. Repeat student answers when the 7. Don’t ignore wrong answers,
they respond; let them finish their responses other students have not heard the answers. follow-up.
unless they are completely missing the 5. Periodically restate the goal of the 8. Sometimes student will restate the
point. discussion so that it is clear for the students. teacher’s questions in their own words and
2. "Echo" their responses in your own It is particularly important to ask questions ask the teacher for a response -- getting the
words. near the end of your discussion that help teacher to do the intellectual work. When
3. Acknowledge correct answers and make it clear whether or not the goal has such an event occurs, restate the ques-
provide positive reinforcement. Identify been achieved. Identify areas in need of tion, and pose it to the class.
clarification. 9. If you don’t know the answer to a stu-
incorrect responses (try to find out the rea-
soning behind it) and ask for alternative 6. Ask probing questions to trigger dent’s question, nor anyone in class, make
6
explanations from other students. more responses, to adjust or to redirect.
a plan for finding the answer.
PAGE
7. Do the test
How good are your questioning skills? yes no
I prepare questions as part of my lesson preparation.
I make sure I use a variety of questions.
I always count to 3 after posing a question.
I make sure all students get an opportunity to answer a question.
I actively engage all students in thinking.
I use a variety of prompts to encourage further reasoning and answers.
I use student answers as a start for further (probing) questioning.
I try to follow the line of thought of a student who gave a wrong answer.
I involve other students in the discussion after 1 student has given an answer.
How to use this learning file in CPD?
Steps to follow (as a department or section or a group of people who would like to improve their classroom questioning techniques)
1. Discuss the learning file (e.g. during CPD time). See if there is a shared understanding. Feel free to add on more information that
might for example be specific for your subject.
2. Reflect on your current practice. Compile a list of typical questions asked during some recent lessons.
a.How much variety do you observe in the questioning? (see the learning file)
• How far do these questions require different levels of thinking? Check if you can place the questions in one of the catego-
ries of Bloom’s taxonomy of questions
• How far were the questions asked open or closed?
b. Try to come up with some more open questions that stimulate higher order thinking that you could have asked. Discuss in pairs
and in the group.
3. Lesson study approach
a. In groups (or as a section), plan a demonstration lesson in which features of good questioning techniques will be used.
b. Somebody volunteers to teach the lesson; other observe and one person records the lesson on video. People observing could in
advance agree to focus on different features of questioning techniques (different types of questions but see also tips and tricks
and handling answers)
c. Exchange notes and views about the questioning techniques used in the lesson in pairs and then as a whole group (the video
could be played again to aid the discussion)
d. Agree on lessons learned and next steps
4. Alternatively, personal action plan approach,
This is a short term commitment to implementation by all members of the group.
a. They answer a simple question: what am I going to put into action during the coming week? e.g. ”I will prepare at least 5 ques-
tions, based on lessons learned from this learning file, for each lesson I will teach in the coming week.”
b. Try out and individual reflection (did I do what I promised to do? How did it go?)
c. Group meeting: exchange of experiences, challenges, finding solutions.
d. Agree on lessons learned and next steps
5. Invite each other to observe each other’s lesson and coach each other
6. Discuss the experiences during a whole staff CPD meeting
PAGE 7
8. Reflections
What did you take with you from this learning file in terms of
knowledge, insights, skills, attitudes?
How will you use what you’ve What questions do you still
learned ? have?
Literature
Lujan, M.L., 2007. Critical Thinking, Based on Bloom’s taxonomy. s.n., 2009. School-Based Continuing Professional Development
Mentoring Mind (SBCPD) through Lesson Study. Teaching skills book. Ministry of
Education and JICA.
Martin-Kniep, G., Picone-Zocchia, J. (2009). Changing the way you
teach. Improving the way students learn. Alexandria: ASCD. Wragg, E.C., Brown, G., 2001. Questioning in the secondary school.
London: Routledge.
Marzano, R.J., Pickering, D.J., Pollock, J.E. (2001). Classroom in-
struction that works. Alexandria, VA: ASCD. http://www.phy.ilstu.edu/pte/311content/questioning/techniques.html
(retrieved on 27 July 2011)
Muijs, D., Reynolds, D. (2007). Effective teaching: evidence and
practice. London: SAGE Publications Ltd. http://www.grrec.ky.gov/MathAlliance/Questioning%20Techniques%
20For%20the%20Classroom.pdf (retrieved on 27 July 2011)
Peery, A. (2009). Power strategies for effective teaching. Eng-
lewood: The Leadership and learning Center. http://www.learner.org/workshops/socialstudies/pdf/
session6/6.ClassroomQuestioning.pdf (retrieved on 27 July 2011)
Skinner, D. (2010). Effective teaching and learning in practice. Lon-
don: Continuum International Publishing Group. http://specialed.about.com/od/teacherchecklists/a/bloom.htm
(retrieved on 27 July 2011)
s.n., 2002. Building blocks for better teaching. Module 1: Question-
ing and how they lead to learning. Sacred Heart College Research & http://www.oir.uiuc.edu/Did/docs/QUESTION (retrieved on 27 July
Development. 2011)
the learning files
Research: Hans Casier, Lieve Leroy General editing, photographs and graphical Contact: info@vvob.org.zm
design: Lieve Leroy
Editing: Patrick Kayawe, Lieve Leroy, Crispin
Maambo Publishing: VVOB-MOE Teacher training support
Critical readers: Hans Casier, Geoffrey Chilika, programme
Leonie Meijerink, Webster Mwape