TAM's College hired a marketing agency, NAMS, to help improve their reputation. NAMS agreed to provide intensive promotion for one month for £2500. However, NAMS stopped the marketing campaign early due to lack of payment. TAM's College sued NAMS for breach of contract. Additionally, a night guard at TAM's College was injured while on duty for not wearing the proper uniform, as instructed. The guard's family sued and won due to the doctrine of vicarious liability, whereby TAM's College was held legally responsible despite not being directly at fault.