The document discusses a case involving contracts between TAM's College and NAMS marketing firm. NAMS was hired for one month to promote TAM's but broke the contract after one week. TAM's sued based on a contract term requiring NAMS to refund fees and pay £1500 if they failed to deliver. TAM's was also sued under vicarious liability because a staff member was injured for not wearing proper attire as required. The document analyzes elements of a valid contract, different contract types, terms, and defenses. It contrasts tort and contractual liability, discusses negligence elements and defenses, and how vicarious liability applies to businesses.