(1) The University of Vermont implemented a Clean Energy Fund in 2009 funded by a $10 per student fee to support renewable energy projects, education, and research on campus.
(2) An implementation team was created to manage the projects since the initial proposals lacked expertise, and processes needed to be developed for distributing funds and working with various campus stakeholders.
(3) Lessons learned included having clear roles for all involved, thorough documentation of processes and people, and developing a strong management plan to support long-term project implementation and integration with academics.
Green Funds 2.0 Nitty Gritty Of Campus Sustainability Fund ManagementMieko Ozeki
prepared by Mieko Ozeki, Katherine Walsh (UC Berkeley), Kevin Ordean (Northern Arizona University), Lilith Wyatt (McGill University), Melody Hartke (North American University), and McKenzie Beverage (University of Illinois- Urbana Champaign) and presented at the AASHE 2012 Conference.
A campus sustainability fund (also called green fund) is money available to campus community members for sustainability projects. Money for the fund may be from student fees, administrative budgets, or alumni donations and funding may be allocated in the form of grants or loans. Currently, there are over 175 green/sustainability funds in North America run by 155 institutions. Our goal as session leaders is to educate our audience beyond the basics of sustainability funds, by adhering to an overall theme of “So you have established a sustainability fund, what next?” We will cover case studies from six well-established sustainability funds and address key differences and patterns in how these funds have evolved in their management and processes.
Topics covered include: 1) strategies for soliciting sustainability projects; 2) criteria for projects: what can and cannot be funded; 3) project implementation plans and long-term support of projects beyond initial funding; 4) sustainability fund staffing and committee structures; 5) advising project leaders; and 6) and quantifying and reporting the metrics of funded projects.
Session leaders will break the 60–minute session into three 20-minute sections: (1) project solicitation and developing selection criteria with committees and staff; (2) project implementation, advising project leaders, and reporting structures; and (3) long-term integration of the fund and projects with institutional goals and structures. Each 20-minute section will include presentation from the session leaders and Q&A with the audience. The opening question we plan to answer is “What are we trying to accomplish with these funds?” and the concluding question we plan to answer is “What are the broad educational impacts of sustainability funds?” Post session we intend to create a white paper on best practices of managing a sustainability funds that will include case studies. This workshop is part of a series and a follow-up to Green Funds 1.0: Getting a Fund Started.
AASHE 2013 Green Fund Implementation Guide by Campus Green Fund CollaborativeMieko Ozeki
presented at AASHE 2013 by the Campus Green Fund Collaborative:
McKenzie Beverage, Butler University
Karen Blaney, University of Texas at Austin
Kevin Ordean, Northern Arizona University
Mieko A Ozeki, University of Vermont
Katherine Walsh, UC Berkeley
Lilith Wyatt, McGill University
Sustainability Officers 1.0 To 2.0 Toolkit Strategic And Sane Workload Manag...Mieko Ozeki
prepared by Mieko Ozeki, Lindsey Cromwell Kalkbrenner (Santa Clara University), Tavey McDaniel Capps (Duke University), and Smith Getterman (Baylor University) and presented at AASHE 2012 Conference.
Sustainability staff are involved in many initiatives at a time, and often these are run in collaboration with multiple stakeholders. The Sustainability Office version 1.0 consisted of one staffer--it was easy to determine priorities, manage work flow, and keep track of programs and contacts. The Sustainability Office version 2.0 consists of multiple staff (or students) and a bigger presence on campus. This means we are faced with more “hands in the toybox” and increasing demands from the campus community. How do we juggle multiple concurrent projects, share institutional memory, nurture relationships with campus contacts, repeat best practices, and avoid past mistakes? Overall, how do we create a sense of personal sustainability within the professional operation of our sustainability programs?
Sustainability officers from four universities will share strategies they use to seek balance in the workplace. Many tools exist to help (or hinder) our workflow and projects--we just need to identify our specific needs and determine which tool is best for our work environment. Panelists will share tools they use to increase efficiency when managing staff and students, organizing and tracking progress of multiple projects, documenting and sharing campus metrics, and effectively harness the power of collaboration with campus partners. Rather than simply describing the tools we use, and the purpose(s) they serve on our campuses, we will share our thought processes and strategies in tool selection.
The Role of Sustainability in Career and Workforce DevelopmentMieko Ozeki
Presented at AASHE 2014 in Portland, OR in October 2014. Sustainability offices are in a unique position on campus. With the ability to work across departmental boundaries of campus on sustainability initiatives, our offices can provide professional development opportunities for students to work on while meeting project and program objectives. Internship programs give students the chance to develop their hard and soft skills, gain work experience, and cultivate a body of work for their portfolio; all within the relatively protected setting of an academic environment. This session focuses on how we can serve as workforce trainers and career development facilitators, suggesting best practices for designing and implementing an internship program within your office.
Online Student Engagement and PlatformsLeneka Rhoden
Due to COVID-19, Student Engagement has been rather difficult especially virtually. This presentation will walk you through platforms that are easy to use and will allow you to improve your student engagement strategies once incorporated. The key features and capabilities of each platform are outlined with tips to best use them.
Green Funds 2.0 Nitty Gritty Of Campus Sustainability Fund ManagementMieko Ozeki
prepared by Mieko Ozeki, Katherine Walsh (UC Berkeley), Kevin Ordean (Northern Arizona University), Lilith Wyatt (McGill University), Melody Hartke (North American University), and McKenzie Beverage (University of Illinois- Urbana Champaign) and presented at the AASHE 2012 Conference.
A campus sustainability fund (also called green fund) is money available to campus community members for sustainability projects. Money for the fund may be from student fees, administrative budgets, or alumni donations and funding may be allocated in the form of grants or loans. Currently, there are over 175 green/sustainability funds in North America run by 155 institutions. Our goal as session leaders is to educate our audience beyond the basics of sustainability funds, by adhering to an overall theme of “So you have established a sustainability fund, what next?” We will cover case studies from six well-established sustainability funds and address key differences and patterns in how these funds have evolved in their management and processes.
Topics covered include: 1) strategies for soliciting sustainability projects; 2) criteria for projects: what can and cannot be funded; 3) project implementation plans and long-term support of projects beyond initial funding; 4) sustainability fund staffing and committee structures; 5) advising project leaders; and 6) and quantifying and reporting the metrics of funded projects.
Session leaders will break the 60–minute session into three 20-minute sections: (1) project solicitation and developing selection criteria with committees and staff; (2) project implementation, advising project leaders, and reporting structures; and (3) long-term integration of the fund and projects with institutional goals and structures. Each 20-minute section will include presentation from the session leaders and Q&A with the audience. The opening question we plan to answer is “What are we trying to accomplish with these funds?” and the concluding question we plan to answer is “What are the broad educational impacts of sustainability funds?” Post session we intend to create a white paper on best practices of managing a sustainability funds that will include case studies. This workshop is part of a series and a follow-up to Green Funds 1.0: Getting a Fund Started.
AASHE 2013 Green Fund Implementation Guide by Campus Green Fund CollaborativeMieko Ozeki
presented at AASHE 2013 by the Campus Green Fund Collaborative:
McKenzie Beverage, Butler University
Karen Blaney, University of Texas at Austin
Kevin Ordean, Northern Arizona University
Mieko A Ozeki, University of Vermont
Katherine Walsh, UC Berkeley
Lilith Wyatt, McGill University
Sustainability Officers 1.0 To 2.0 Toolkit Strategic And Sane Workload Manag...Mieko Ozeki
prepared by Mieko Ozeki, Lindsey Cromwell Kalkbrenner (Santa Clara University), Tavey McDaniel Capps (Duke University), and Smith Getterman (Baylor University) and presented at AASHE 2012 Conference.
Sustainability staff are involved in many initiatives at a time, and often these are run in collaboration with multiple stakeholders. The Sustainability Office version 1.0 consisted of one staffer--it was easy to determine priorities, manage work flow, and keep track of programs and contacts. The Sustainability Office version 2.0 consists of multiple staff (or students) and a bigger presence on campus. This means we are faced with more “hands in the toybox” and increasing demands from the campus community. How do we juggle multiple concurrent projects, share institutional memory, nurture relationships with campus contacts, repeat best practices, and avoid past mistakes? Overall, how do we create a sense of personal sustainability within the professional operation of our sustainability programs?
Sustainability officers from four universities will share strategies they use to seek balance in the workplace. Many tools exist to help (or hinder) our workflow and projects--we just need to identify our specific needs and determine which tool is best for our work environment. Panelists will share tools they use to increase efficiency when managing staff and students, organizing and tracking progress of multiple projects, documenting and sharing campus metrics, and effectively harness the power of collaboration with campus partners. Rather than simply describing the tools we use, and the purpose(s) they serve on our campuses, we will share our thought processes and strategies in tool selection.
The Role of Sustainability in Career and Workforce DevelopmentMieko Ozeki
Presented at AASHE 2014 in Portland, OR in October 2014. Sustainability offices are in a unique position on campus. With the ability to work across departmental boundaries of campus on sustainability initiatives, our offices can provide professional development opportunities for students to work on while meeting project and program objectives. Internship programs give students the chance to develop their hard and soft skills, gain work experience, and cultivate a body of work for their portfolio; all within the relatively protected setting of an academic environment. This session focuses on how we can serve as workforce trainers and career development facilitators, suggesting best practices for designing and implementing an internship program within your office.
Online Student Engagement and PlatformsLeneka Rhoden
Due to COVID-19, Student Engagement has been rather difficult especially virtually. This presentation will walk you through platforms that are easy to use and will allow you to improve your student engagement strategies once incorporated. The key features and capabilities of each platform are outlined with tips to best use them.
EDUCAUSE Annual Conference 2021: Digital Transformation to Create a Coordinat...brightspot
brightspot worked with Ohio University to answer these questions and helped them better understand and improve their student experience. Our holistic approach considered courses, student services, technology, facilities, community, and campus culture through an engaging and inclusive process.
In our session, Digital Transformation to Create a Coordinated, Compelling Student Experience, Maggie Walsh and Elliot Felix (brightspot) and Chris Ament and Brian Bowe (Ohio University) discuss our work together and share lessons learned that can be applied at your institution.
SCUP Webinar: Creating a More Adaptive Institution in the Wake of COVID-19brightspot
How can colleges and universities become more adaptive in the wake of COVID-19? This interactive panel discussion brought together open discussion among panelists from UC Berkeley, SUNY Fredonia, Cornell, Minnesota State University, Mankato, and Marquette, and their perspectives from facilities, technology, student services, and finance to understand the impact of COVID-19 on institutions and their student experience.
Delivered at the Emerging Technologies and Authentic Learning in Vocational Higher Education conference in Cape Town, South Africa 31st Aug to 3rd September 2015.
Mentoring for Today’s Generation(s) at Scale: Virtual and Face-to-FaceEDUCAUSE
Mentoring relationships come in many forms--online, in-person, short- and long-term, peer- to-peer, and situational. We'll review mentoring in a multi-generational workforce and explore two mentoring models that can be adapted to fit your organization and serve professionals at various career stages. Model 1 is an international virtual mentoring program that uses data analytics to match participants and digital badging to recognize mentor/mentee achievements. Model 2 uses a just-in-time, conference-centered approach to connecting professionals across career stages. For each model, we'll discuss benefits and barriers and action steps for launching mentoring initiatives that support diverse learners.
Effective practice in setting up and implementing staff-student partnerships:...Sarah Knight
Effective practice in setting up and implementing staff-student partnerships: lessons learnt from Change Agents Network presented at ALT-C on 8/09/14 by Sarah Knight and Peter Chatterton.
5 March 2010 (Friday) | 11:00 - 12:30 | http://citers2010.cite.hku.hk/abstract/72 | Mr. Ian BROWN and Mr. Peter DUFFY, ED Officers, Educational Development Centre, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
My Challenge Based Learning preso for the 2010 Cahuilla CUE Mini Tech Fair.
Challenge Based Learning video by Alas Media can be seen @ http://www.vimeo.com/14224208
Callan’s 2014 Investment Management Fee Survey provides a current report on institutional investment management fee payment practices and trends. To collect this information, Callan sent an electronic questionnaire to a broad sample of U.S.-based institutional fund sponsors and investment management organizations. Respondents provided fee information for calendar year 2013 (specific dates varied by organization, but the majority were as of December 31, 2013), and perspective on fee practices and perspectives for 2014. We supplemented this data with information from Callan’s proprietary databases to establish the trends observed in this report.
Callan conducted similar surveys in 2004, 2006, 2009, and 2011. We offer commentary regarding differences, where relevant, between historical survey results and the 2014 findings, along with observations reflecting both long- and short-term trends.
Seventy-two fund sponsors representing $859 billion in assets, and 211 investment management organizations with $15 trillion in assets under management, provided detailed fee practices and data on 15 asset classes. Results were supplemented by actual and published fee information sourced from Callan’s fund sponsor and investment manager databases, as well as other industry sources.
Key Findings:
*Investment management fees represent 46 basis points (bps), on average, of fund sponsors’ total assets, up from 37 bps in
2009. The difference between the median and average has climbed over this time period. Other data in Callan’s fee survey also reveals a divergence between the funds that pay the most and those that pay the least in investment management fees.
*The range between funds that paid the most (10th percentile) and those that paid the least (90th percentile) increased dramatically:
from 56 bps in 2009 to 73 bps in 2013. Differences in investment policy, and notably asset allocation, can lead to
substantial disparity in fees. While some funds are increasingly looking to low-cost, public market index strategies, others are
investing a greater portion of their portfolio in high-cost alternative assets. Other key survey findings include:
Alternatives, which are consistently the most expensive asset class, are facing fee compression: the median total asset class fee declined from 134 bps in 2009 to 99 bps in 2013, and the 90th percentile fell from 174 bps to 152 bps. Large allocations to alternatives can greatly increase overall investment management fees.
Correlations between percentage of total portfolio allocated to alternatives and fees paid (in bps) were strong in 2013 (+0.70).
Total U.S. and non-U.S. equity fees paid increased marginally from 2009 to 2011, but declined from 2011 to 2013. Median U.S. equity fees run about 60% of their non-U.S. counterparts. Non-U.S. fees are typically higher in part due to research expenses. Fixed income median expenses were flat from 2009 to 2013.
EDUCAUSE Annual Conference 2021: Digital Transformation to Create a Coordinat...brightspot
brightspot worked with Ohio University to answer these questions and helped them better understand and improve their student experience. Our holistic approach considered courses, student services, technology, facilities, community, and campus culture through an engaging and inclusive process.
In our session, Digital Transformation to Create a Coordinated, Compelling Student Experience, Maggie Walsh and Elliot Felix (brightspot) and Chris Ament and Brian Bowe (Ohio University) discuss our work together and share lessons learned that can be applied at your institution.
SCUP Webinar: Creating a More Adaptive Institution in the Wake of COVID-19brightspot
How can colleges and universities become more adaptive in the wake of COVID-19? This interactive panel discussion brought together open discussion among panelists from UC Berkeley, SUNY Fredonia, Cornell, Minnesota State University, Mankato, and Marquette, and their perspectives from facilities, technology, student services, and finance to understand the impact of COVID-19 on institutions and their student experience.
Delivered at the Emerging Technologies and Authentic Learning in Vocational Higher Education conference in Cape Town, South Africa 31st Aug to 3rd September 2015.
Mentoring for Today’s Generation(s) at Scale: Virtual and Face-to-FaceEDUCAUSE
Mentoring relationships come in many forms--online, in-person, short- and long-term, peer- to-peer, and situational. We'll review mentoring in a multi-generational workforce and explore two mentoring models that can be adapted to fit your organization and serve professionals at various career stages. Model 1 is an international virtual mentoring program that uses data analytics to match participants and digital badging to recognize mentor/mentee achievements. Model 2 uses a just-in-time, conference-centered approach to connecting professionals across career stages. For each model, we'll discuss benefits and barriers and action steps for launching mentoring initiatives that support diverse learners.
Effective practice in setting up and implementing staff-student partnerships:...Sarah Knight
Effective practice in setting up and implementing staff-student partnerships: lessons learnt from Change Agents Network presented at ALT-C on 8/09/14 by Sarah Knight and Peter Chatterton.
5 March 2010 (Friday) | 11:00 - 12:30 | http://citers2010.cite.hku.hk/abstract/72 | Mr. Ian BROWN and Mr. Peter DUFFY, ED Officers, Educational Development Centre, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
My Challenge Based Learning preso for the 2010 Cahuilla CUE Mini Tech Fair.
Challenge Based Learning video by Alas Media can be seen @ http://www.vimeo.com/14224208
Callan’s 2014 Investment Management Fee Survey provides a current report on institutional investment management fee payment practices and trends. To collect this information, Callan sent an electronic questionnaire to a broad sample of U.S.-based institutional fund sponsors and investment management organizations. Respondents provided fee information for calendar year 2013 (specific dates varied by organization, but the majority were as of December 31, 2013), and perspective on fee practices and perspectives for 2014. We supplemented this data with information from Callan’s proprietary databases to establish the trends observed in this report.
Callan conducted similar surveys in 2004, 2006, 2009, and 2011. We offer commentary regarding differences, where relevant, between historical survey results and the 2014 findings, along with observations reflecting both long- and short-term trends.
Seventy-two fund sponsors representing $859 billion in assets, and 211 investment management organizations with $15 trillion in assets under management, provided detailed fee practices and data on 15 asset classes. Results were supplemented by actual and published fee information sourced from Callan’s fund sponsor and investment manager databases, as well as other industry sources.
Key Findings:
*Investment management fees represent 46 basis points (bps), on average, of fund sponsors’ total assets, up from 37 bps in
2009. The difference between the median and average has climbed over this time period. Other data in Callan’s fee survey also reveals a divergence between the funds that pay the most and those that pay the least in investment management fees.
*The range between funds that paid the most (10th percentile) and those that paid the least (90th percentile) increased dramatically:
from 56 bps in 2009 to 73 bps in 2013. Differences in investment policy, and notably asset allocation, can lead to
substantial disparity in fees. While some funds are increasingly looking to low-cost, public market index strategies, others are
investing a greater portion of their portfolio in high-cost alternative assets. Other key survey findings include:
Alternatives, which are consistently the most expensive asset class, are facing fee compression: the median total asset class fee declined from 134 bps in 2009 to 99 bps in 2013, and the 90th percentile fell from 174 bps to 152 bps. Large allocations to alternatives can greatly increase overall investment management fees.
Correlations between percentage of total portfolio allocated to alternatives and fees paid (in bps) were strong in 2013 (+0.70).
Total U.S. and non-U.S. equity fees paid increased marginally from 2009 to 2011, but declined from 2011 to 2013. Median U.S. equity fees run about 60% of their non-U.S. counterparts. Non-U.S. fees are typically higher in part due to research expenses. Fixed income median expenses were flat from 2009 to 2013.
A Literature Survey on Mobile-Learning Management SystemsAM Publications
In today’s digital era, due to development in wireless communication technology, proliferation of electronics gazettes usage especially smartphones is at peak point across the globe. Without smartphone, most of the individuals feel inconvenience in their daily routine India is not an exception for it, today; India has the second-biggest smartphone market in terms of active unique smartphone users, which crossed 220 million users. These innovations and developments in mobile technologies have an impact on education and learning systems which in turn resulted into the potential to develop an education system that enables individuals and groups to learn bypassing the time and place constraints. This paper gives a glimpse on characteristics, elements, security risks, design issues and challenges of mobile learning management system.
Designing, Implementing, and Project Managing Campus Green FundsMieko Ozeki
Presented on March 21, 2012 at Ball State University's Greening of the Campus IX Conference by Mieko Ozeki, Sustainability Projects Coordinator and Clean Energy Fund Manager.
College campuses across the U.S. and abroad have seen a growth of student campaigns to take institutional action on climate change. One of the barriers to implementing sustainability initiatives on-campus has been financing these efforts through existing internal resources, such as general and administrative funds or institutional endowments. Student green fees are one of many alternative financial mechanisms to support sustainability initiatives on college campuses. Documentation on student green fees focus primarily on the creation of this financial structure through student campaigns, but there are limited resources that explore the design and management of these programs once they go into effect.
This paper reviews the institutional characteristics of 89 colleges and universities in the North America that currently collect at least one student green fee. A total of 98 green fees have been identified from student reports, online research, and an online survey conducted in October 2010. A majority of these fees was allocated to a broad range of sustainability initiatives while others explicitly fund services such as recycling programs, green attributes of capital construction projects, or supporting a campus sustainability office. Five sustainability managers were interviewed for an exploratory review of lessons learned on the design and implementation of student green fee programs. Four areas of student green fee design and management are highlighted with advice from sustainability managers. The intent of this presentation is to provide background info on this funding mechanism and offer recommendations on best practices for designing green fee campaigns and managing funded projects.
Strategic Renewable Energy Planning on Campus
Part of a workshop presented by Mieko A Ozeki, University of Vermont
This workshop will share lessons learned from two public institutions, University of Connecticut and the University of Vermont, that carried out comprehensive renewable energy feasibility studies and renewable energy plans on their respective campuses. Participants will break up into small groups to brainstorm ideas to implement a renewable energy and microgrid plan, and mindmap how these ideas can be tied to research, co-curricular education activities, green job opportunities, operations, and climate action planning on their respective campuses.
A collaborative presentation by Lawrence Technological University, the University of New Haven, Western New England University, Ohio Northern University, Villanova University, and Baylor University explaining best faculty practices for career advancement.
Effective Energy Management - California Savings Summit 2013SchoolDude
You don’t have to spend a ton of capital or energy to save on both utility costs and consumption. This session will offer practical advice on both starting and maintaining an effective energy management plan.
The University of Vermont’s Office of Sustainability aims to foster sustainable development and promote environmental responsibility at every level of the university. In 2010, the Office of Sustainability launched an initiative to incorporate collective intelligence and idea management into the Office’s processes and began by seeking out ideas for their Clean Energy Fund.
Read more about how the University of Vermont increased user participation by 72% through changing their submission process and received 68 new ideas from students to help create a greener campus.
IEEE Educational Activities’ Pre-University Education Programs Muhammad Mustafa
This presentation gives a brief view about IEEE Educational Activities, as well as detailed information about the IEEE Pre-University Activities.
IEEE and the IEEE Educational Activities Board (EAB) are committed to providing quality educational resources for educators, parents, students, IEEE volunteers, and the public.
The quarterly Collaborative Meetings are designed for researchers in the field of K-12 online and blended learning. It is a space for researchers to come together, get feedback on their work, and share any opportunities for collaborations for grants, research, publications, etc. These Collaborative Meetings are held in January, April, July, and October.
Data-Driven STEM Curriculum Adoption through Inter-Campus Faculty GroupsChristoph Winkler
Kingsborough’s Center for Economic and Workforce Development (CEWD) will introduce a Peer-Led STEM Adoption System (PLSA), comprised of a technology tool (the "STEM Dashboard") and a corresponding peer-led mentoring process. This process is intended to (1) respond rapidly and efficiently to local economic needs and (2) cut back on costly duplication of curriculum development efforts, allowing colleges to efficiently adopt high-quality STEM curricula that have been developed by experts recognized by National Science Foundation funding.
Presented at the 9th Annual CUNY IT Conference: http://www.convergemag.com/events/CUNY-9th-Annual-Conference-2010-Day-1.html
Project Managing and Implementing STARS 2.1 processMieko Ozeki
Co-Presented at Northeast Campus Sustainability Consortium Conference on April 1, 2016 and Smart & Sustainable Campuses Conference on April 4, 2016 with Aaron Witham.
STARS submission requires a coordinated data collection effort across dozens of departments and individuals. This workshop walks through the project management process of implementing the data collection, reporting, and submission process. The University of Vermont’s Office of Sustainability will demonstrate the process, principles, and tools they use to implement the STARS 2.1 process. A starter kit will be demonstrated during this session.
AASHE 2014 Mind Mapping: A Systems Thinking Application for Change ManagementMieko Ozeki
A pre-conference workshop, co-facilitated at AASHE 2014 by Mieko Ozeki and Jenna Ringelheim. A growing number of students, faculty, and staff are increasingly concerned about their environmental impacts and demand immediate action to be taken. Despite good intentions, these same people can act in haste rather than strategically implementing a long term solution. This session will guide participants through the process of mind mapping, based on the frameworks of systems thinking, design thinking, and project management, to identify opportunities for collaboration and mitigating/managing risk. Workshop participants will learn about the process of mind mapping, a technique for visually diagramming information. They will be given an example of how a campus applies this technique to looking at a specific issues, develop and implement an action plan during the session. Mind mapping is a strategic planning process for implementing sustainability into institutional operations, academics, and planning, administration, and engagement. It applies systems thinking, design thinking, and project management. Participants will draft a mind map, scope statement, and task list that focuses on a current issue he/she is working on at their institution. The workshop provides sustainability officers with the space and time to think and construct a strategy for addressing an issue on campus. The workshop time is 15% presentation and 85% discussing/constructing a mindmap with partners. Be prepared for this work session and bring two problems we can work on together through this process.
AASHE 2014 Student Summit- Preparing for the Real World: Kickstarting Your Su...Mieko Ozeki
While students will still have to determine the exact career they would like to pursue, and maybe pick out what they will wear on interview day, at the end of the workshop they should hopefully have the rest covered. Attendees will assess their hard and soft skills, discover what work they enjoy, determine the assets they need to build, learn how to build a professional portfolio and learn how to create their own brand to set them apart. We hope to have students walk out of the presentation confident that they can handle the next steps to land their first job out of college. No matter their major, job experience, and extracurriculars, students will leave with a better appreciation of their strengths and understand there are multiple paths to be followed on the way to their dream green job. Attendees will learn about themselves through interactive activities, including mind mapping and writing their own compelling and engaging story. Attendees are encouraged to assess and reflect on their own personal experiences and passions to uncover what makes them unique and valuable. They will then be able to build their own personal portfolios and establish an undeniable online and physical presence. We even offer a brief introduction to the general sustainability field, as well as suggest on-campus tools and search engines to find green jobs.
Strengthening Relationships by Removing Blame: Constructive Relationships wit...Mieko Ozeki
Workshop presented at New England Campus Sustainability Forum in Boston, MA on September 20, 2013. This workshop focused on constructive conversations and applying systems thinking through mind-mapping.
AASHE 2013 workshop facilitated by Mieko Ozeki, Sustainability Projects Coordinator at the University of Vermont, and Daniel Roth, Associate Director for Sustainability at Cornell University.
Strengthening Relationships by Removing Blame: Constructive Relationships wit...Mieko Ozeki
Co-presented by Mieko Ozeki, Sustainability Projects Coordinator at the University of Vermont, and Dallase Scott, Sustainability Program Manager at GreenerU.
Project Management Strategies for the Environmental LeaderMieko Ozeki
Do you feel like you have a million projects going on at your organization? Are you having a difficult time keeping track of and managing these projects? This webinar will discuss best practices for developing project management systems that optimize communication and effectively achieve short and long term project goals. The purpose of the presentation is to provide environmental leaders with a tool box of technical solutions to help organize the multitude of projects while preventing burn out and maintaining sanity.
Mieko Ozeki is the Sustainability Projects Coordinator at the University of Vermont and is a Senior Fellow of the Environmental Leadership Program.
Have you ever “googled” yourself and wondered what you (and others) can find about yourself? Do you know what your personal brand is and what is a personal brand anyhow? This webinar will provide some insights on personal branding, exploring how you project yourself to others whether in-person or to a virtual community, and what your “reputation” means in a digital world. We will introduce some simple exercises for participants to explore their unique strengths with the intention of building a personal brand. We’ll transition into how you can project and build your personal brand into the social media/online world. Tools and techniques for personal branding will be suggested in this session.
Presented by Jenna Ringelheim, National Program Director at the Environmental Leadership Program
Mieko A. Ozeki, ELP Senior Fellow, at miekoozeki.com
Have you ever “googled” yourself and wondered what you (and others) can find about yourself? Do you know what your personal brand is and what is a personal brand anyhow? This webinar will provide some insights on personal branding, exploring how you project yourself to others whether in-person or to a virtual community, and what your “reputation” means in a digital world. We will introduce some simple exercises for participants to explore their unique strengths with the intention of building a personal brand. We’ll transition into how you can project and build your personal brand into the social media/online world. Tools and techniques for personal branding will be suggested in this session.
Mapping Renewable Energy Potential On Campus A Case Study Of A Strategic Gre...
AASHE 2010 Student Green Fee Management
1. Student Green Fee Management and Project Implementation
Panel Members
Mieko A. Ozeki, University of Vermont
Suhail Barot, University of Illinois- Urbana-Champaign
Nicole Leung, University of California- Berkeley
Cindy Shea, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Jedd Wilcox, University of Vermont
Moderator
Amber Garrard, Green Mountain College
AASHE 2010
2. What are student green fees?
• Revenue collected from comprehensive student
fees to fund major, campus wide, sustainability
and energy initiatives (CampusIn Power, 2008)
• An alternative funding source, ranging $1 to
$58 per student per academic term (quarter,
semester, trimester, or year). (Bintliff, 2009)
• Students propose and run campaigns to create
a green fee on campus.
• Senior administrators or Board of Trustees
approve the green fee.
3. Student Green Funds in North America
Created in
Google Maps
• More than 70+ colleges and universities listed with student green fees
to date.
• The number of institutions starting student green funds is steadily
increasing.
4. Sample of Projects Funded
• Sustainability • Granting awards to
director/ coordinator sustainability
positions champions
• Installation of wind • Installation of
turbines and/or solar composting facilities
panels on campus • Feasibility study for for
• Energy efficiency sustainability
retrofits improvements
• On-campus garden • Funding campus
• Energy competitions sustainability and
• Academic courses environmental resource
centers.
• Student internships
• Creation of campus
energy “dashboard” List from Bintliff, 2009.
energy management
system
• Lecture series
• Weatherization
workshops.
• Renewable energy
credits
5. For this session…
• We will not discuss “how-to” create a student green fee.
• We will discuss:
What structures and processes were utilized to:
– implement and manage projects,
– engage and encourage students, faculty, and staff to
participate in green fund projects,
– connect projects to academics,
– tracking project performance and progress,
for the long term?
• The take away: Ideas for managing student green fee projects.
6. Resources
• Bintliff, Jacob (2009). Student Green Funds:
1997-2009.
• Campus InPower (2008). Raise the Funds: Campus
Action Toolkit. Available on AASHE’s Resource page.
7. Research Plug
I am conducting research on best practices
implementing and managing student green fund projects
in the United States for Harvard Extension School.
Research involves:
• Survey Monkey questionnaire to develop a
comprehensive list and map of student green funds
• In-depth interviews to gain analyze best practices
from green fund coordinators
If you have a student green fee, please send your contact
information to mozeki@uvm.edu
8. From Eco-Clutter to Integrated
Systems: Student Green Fees as a
Learning Tool
UVM Office of Sustainability
Mieko A. Ozeki, Sustainability Projects Coordinator
James Wilcox, CEF Education & Outreach Fellow
9. UVM Profile
Public, land grant institution founded
in 1791 and located in Burlington, VT.
Full-time Students: 10,371 Undergrad;
1,516 Graduate; and 460 Medical
students
Faculty: 1,200 FTE
Staff: 2,300 FTE
Student body highly engaged in social
and environmental justice issues.
Number of formal student
clubs/coalitions:
• 6 environmental/food related
• 2 social justice + SGA Committee
on Diversity, Equity, and
Environmental Ethics
10. Pre-CEF: Renewable Energy Pilot Projects
5-kW Solar array (2001) 10-kW Wind Turbine (2006)
• Intended to raise awareness about the potential for renewable energy on campus.
• We were opportunistic and not strategic about the solar and wind installations.
• No clear long-term commitment to integration of projects with academics.
• Steep learning curve implementing these projects.
• Lacked coordination
• No thought about or funding for decommissioning.
11. Pre-CEF: Context
• Students have little experience implementing
installation projects.
• Faculty have little experience implementing
installation projects.
• Staff do not have the capacity to integrate installation
projects with academics
12. What is UVM’s Clean Energy Fund?
• Sustained by a self-imposed student
fee of $10 per student per semester,
the Clean Energy Fund (CEF) is
designed to advance renewable
energy research, education, and
infrastructure on campus
• Idea for CEF began in 2005, endorsed
by SGA in 2007, and approved by the
Board of Trustees in 2008 in response
to student petitions to fund renewable
energy installations and energy
education
• Estimated annual accumulation to the
fund: $225,000
13. CEF Organizational & Project Selection Process 2009-2010
Fund Oversight
VP Finance &
and Final Project Administration
Approval
CEF
CEF
Project Selection Committee
Administration
Team
Project
VPFA Liaison CEF Manager
Coordination
14. CEF First Round 2009-2010
• Fall 2008: Fee collection began
• December 2008: First committee meeting
• February 2009: CEF committee bylaws passed
• April 2009: Committee approves general guidelines for projects
• October 2009: First RFP is released
• November 2009: 19 proposals received
• December 2009: Preliminary approval of 8 proposed projects
• January 2010: Office of Sustainability repackages project proposals
based on interviews with project applicants.
• February 2010: Committee made final recommendation to VPFA
• March 2010: VPFA approves all 2009-2010 projects
15. The Writing on the Wall:
the need for an implementation team
• Leveraging CEF for potential match funds
• Those submitting proposals lacked the expertise on
renewable energy
• Identifying the need for dedicated staff to navigate
UVM’s complex institutional systems
16. CEF Organizational & Project Selection Process 2010-2011
Fund Oversight and VP Finance &
Final Project Approval Administration
Project Selection CEF Committee
CEF Administration
Team
Implementation
Team
Project VPFA Liaison CEF Manager
Project
Managers
Implementation
Project Accountability CEF Education & Projects Liaison
& Outreach Outreach Fellow
17. 2009-2010 CEF Projects
Installations
• Aiken Solar Trackers at Forest Service
Site
• Photovoltaic System on Equine Center
Roof
• Solar Hot Water on Slade Hall Shed
Courses
• Certified Energy Auditor and Renewable
Energy Retrofit Training Course
• Virtual Solar Carport Course
Research & Studies
• Biomass Feasibility Study for Trinity
Campus
• Solar Power and Smart Grid Research
CEF Program & Outreach
• CEF Implementation, Education &
Outreach Program
• University-wide Energy Display System
18. So, What Now?
Once the projects were approved, the real work began….
• Distributing the funds was not easy.
• Key staff and business managers were caught off-guard
when informed about projects.
• Recruiting and getting CEF Fellow to start up education
and outreach efforts took a few months.
• Staff were learning and cobbling new processes while
implementing projects.
19. 2010-2011 CEF Program Planning
Request for Proposals Request for Ideas
• Activates the collective
intelligence of the UVM
community to gather the best ideas
• Increases student engagement
with and sense of ownership of the
CEF
•Allows for consistent project
management of CEF projects in
subsequent years (no “ownership”
of project proposals)
20. Education & Outreach
• Make connections between
curriculum and renewable
installations
• Move toward campus-wide
energy monitoring
• Identify and apply for matching
funds
• Provide status reports to Clean
Energy Fund Committee Next step: create online portfolio of CEF
projects
• Public outreach about the Clean
Energy Fund
21. Lessons Learned
• No projects are headache free.
• Know who should be involved & make all roles
clear.
• Document, document, document
– Processes
– Key people involved
– Project strategy and progress
• Don’t skimp on your management plan!
22. Contact information
UVM Office of Sustainability
Mieko A. Ozeki, CEF Manager and Projects Coordinator
sustainability@uvm.edu
Jedd Wilcox, CEF Education & Outreach Fellow
cef@uvm.edu
Website:
www.uvm.edu/sustainability