This document summarizes a roundtable discussion between campus sustainability officers and senior fellows in the Environmental Leadership Program on sustainability education. The participants discuss defining sustainability education as acquiring skills to work across disciplines, understand complex systems and interconnectivity, and feel empowered to educate others and enact change. They emphasize skills like critical thinking, consensus building, and communication. Filling educational roles on campus allows them to demonstrate skills and help students develop professionally while working on "real-world" sustainability issues.
Keynote presentation for the Education Leaders Forum - New Zealand. Abstract: The COVID pandemic has thrown back the curtain on a great deal of what needs to be improved or addressed in our current education system, including a high degree of inequity across all areas, especially access to onlinelearning.
The responses we saw during the 2020 lockdowns promised some transformative action and outcomes. But slowly we’ve seen a ‘return to the old normal’ mindset. The ‘big ideas’ that were evident have faded into obscurity as the old patterns of thinking and acting take over.
Tryus L. Doctor & William Kritsonis
PhD Program in Educational Leadership
Prairie View A&M University
Member of the Texas A&M Univ. System
Introduction
Nationwide school communities are faced with the extreme and gut wrenching task of successfully meeting state and federal accountability guidelines. Upon the passing of the No Child Left Behind Act, the onus of reaching these goals lies in the hands of district superintendents, principals, teachers and students. This has put extreme pressure on superintendents and principals to ensure that their students perform at an exemplary level.
An educator’s main goal shall be to provide students with the best education possible, while providing them with the skills needed to be successful in their future endeavors. In an effort to achieve students’ success and reach state and federal accountability standards, it is imperative that educators have a detailed plan to achieve these goals. To assume that these goals may be reached without Postmodernistic forethought and planning would prove to be catastrophic to the entire school community. Thus, it is the obligation of educational leaders to implement a “Postmodern” organizational plan that will assist in the success of our schools and, most of all, the success of our students.
Purpose of the Article
The purpose of this article is to express the significance of postmodernism using the six realms of meaning found in the Ways of Knowing Through the Realms of Meaning (2007) by Dr. William A. Kritsonis. Upon reading The Ways of Knowing Through the Realms of Meaning, it becomes apparent that each of the Realms explained in this text may be applied to each postmodern educational entity. Postmodernism will provide students with an educational experience comprised of strong academic skills, effective teachers and opportunities for growth.
Symbolics in Instructional Management
The postmodern principal of an effective school serves as an exceptional educational leader, who is a highly valuable and consistent communicator with parents, students, and staff. The ability for a principal to articulate well with each stakeholder is imperative for the overall success of the school. This type of postmodern leadership ability allows principals to develop relationships with students, parents, and staff in nontraditional ways, which Blankstein asserts by stating that “Relationships are at the core of successful learning communities (2004). This postmodern notion unites the knower and the known, abolishes objectivity and subjectivity, and erases the line between fact and fiction leaders and followers (English, 2003).
“The first realm, symbolics, comprises ordinary language, mathematics and various types of nondiscursive symbolic forms, such as gestures, rituals, rhythmic patterns, and the like” (Kritsonis, 2007, p. 11). As stated in Ways of Knowing Through the Realms of Meaning (Kritsonis, 2007), there is an ordinary language that is utilized in communications among with people. This form of language is “the forms of discourse employed in everyday speech and writing” (Kritsonis, 2007, p. 111). It is clear and concise, which allows others to have a lucid understanding of what is ex-
pected of them or what they should take away from any conversations you may have. The use of ordinary language by educational leaders’ would assist in developing a clear line of communication. Communication between all stakeholders that is unambiguous and distinct is imperative to the success of the school.
Principals also provide opportunities for others to share in leadership roles in that the principal and staff must work collaboratively to articulate and stress the importance of learning, establishing high expectations for students, teachers, and principals (California Center). Likewise, English validates such communication by asserting that “Such leadership [transformation] occurs when one or more persons enga
Keynote presentation for the Education Leaders Forum - New Zealand. Abstract: The COVID pandemic has thrown back the curtain on a great deal of what needs to be improved or addressed in our current education system, including a high degree of inequity across all areas, especially access to onlinelearning.
The responses we saw during the 2020 lockdowns promised some transformative action and outcomes. But slowly we’ve seen a ‘return to the old normal’ mindset. The ‘big ideas’ that were evident have faded into obscurity as the old patterns of thinking and acting take over.
Tryus L. Doctor & William Kritsonis
PhD Program in Educational Leadership
Prairie View A&M University
Member of the Texas A&M Univ. System
Introduction
Nationwide school communities are faced with the extreme and gut wrenching task of successfully meeting state and federal accountability guidelines. Upon the passing of the No Child Left Behind Act, the onus of reaching these goals lies in the hands of district superintendents, principals, teachers and students. This has put extreme pressure on superintendents and principals to ensure that their students perform at an exemplary level.
An educator’s main goal shall be to provide students with the best education possible, while providing them with the skills needed to be successful in their future endeavors. In an effort to achieve students’ success and reach state and federal accountability standards, it is imperative that educators have a detailed plan to achieve these goals. To assume that these goals may be reached without Postmodernistic forethought and planning would prove to be catastrophic to the entire school community. Thus, it is the obligation of educational leaders to implement a “Postmodern” organizational plan that will assist in the success of our schools and, most of all, the success of our students.
Purpose of the Article
The purpose of this article is to express the significance of postmodernism using the six realms of meaning found in the Ways of Knowing Through the Realms of Meaning (2007) by Dr. William A. Kritsonis. Upon reading The Ways of Knowing Through the Realms of Meaning, it becomes apparent that each of the Realms explained in this text may be applied to each postmodern educational entity. Postmodernism will provide students with an educational experience comprised of strong academic skills, effective teachers and opportunities for growth.
Symbolics in Instructional Management
The postmodern principal of an effective school serves as an exceptional educational leader, who is a highly valuable and consistent communicator with parents, students, and staff. The ability for a principal to articulate well with each stakeholder is imperative for the overall success of the school. This type of postmodern leadership ability allows principals to develop relationships with students, parents, and staff in nontraditional ways, which Blankstein asserts by stating that “Relationships are at the core of successful learning communities (2004). This postmodern notion unites the knower and the known, abolishes objectivity and subjectivity, and erases the line between fact and fiction leaders and followers (English, 2003).
“The first realm, symbolics, comprises ordinary language, mathematics and various types of nondiscursive symbolic forms, such as gestures, rituals, rhythmic patterns, and the like” (Kritsonis, 2007, p. 11). As stated in Ways of Knowing Through the Realms of Meaning (Kritsonis, 2007), there is an ordinary language that is utilized in communications among with people. This form of language is “the forms of discourse employed in everyday speech and writing” (Kritsonis, 2007, p. 111). It is clear and concise, which allows others to have a lucid understanding of what is ex-
pected of them or what they should take away from any conversations you may have. The use of ordinary language by educational leaders’ would assist in developing a clear line of communication. Communication between all stakeholders that is unambiguous and distinct is imperative to the success of the school.
Principals also provide opportunities for others to share in leadership roles in that the principal and staff must work collaboratively to articulate and stress the importance of learning, establishing high expectations for students, teachers, and principals (California Center). Likewise, English validates such communication by asserting that “Such leadership [transformation] occurs when one or more persons enga
‘They treated us like one of them really’: Peer education as an approach to s...Simon Forrest
Powerpoint presentation about sexual health promotion for young people. By Dr Simon Forrest, Durham University(http://www.dur.ac.uk/school.health/staff/?username=wsrg35).
A way of looking at all of education and learning to promote discussion about the relationship between informal, non-formal & formal learning ahead of EU i2015. Can help thinking about; business models of institutions, the social processes of learning, learning resource design, OER co-creation of learning processes
Mahara and Collaboration: Building communities of practice.Mahara Hui
Presentation at Mahara Hui 2017 by Sue Smarti and Gwen Davitt (Te Rito Maioha Early Childhood New Zealand) in Auckland, New Zealand, on 7 April 2017.
YouTube presentation link can be found here: https://youtu.be/S2OTJX980SI
Have you ever “googled” yourself and wondered what you (and others) can find about yourself? Do you know what your personal brand is and what is a personal brand anyhow? This webinar will provide some insights on personal branding, exploring how you project yourself to others whether in-person or to a virtual community, and what your “reputation” means in a digital world. We will introduce some simple exercises for participants to explore their unique strengths with the intention of building a personal brand. We’ll transition into how you can project and build your personal brand into the social media/online world. Tools and techniques for personal branding will be suggested in this session.
AASHE 2014 Student Summit- Preparing for the Real World: Kickstarting Your Su...Mieko Ozeki
While students will still have to determine the exact career they would like to pursue, and maybe pick out what they will wear on interview day, at the end of the workshop they should hopefully have the rest covered. Attendees will assess their hard and soft skills, discover what work they enjoy, determine the assets they need to build, learn how to build a professional portfolio and learn how to create their own brand to set them apart. We hope to have students walk out of the presentation confident that they can handle the next steps to land their first job out of college. No matter their major, job experience, and extracurriculars, students will leave with a better appreciation of their strengths and understand there are multiple paths to be followed on the way to their dream green job. Attendees will learn about themselves through interactive activities, including mind mapping and writing their own compelling and engaging story. Attendees are encouraged to assess and reflect on their own personal experiences and passions to uncover what makes them unique and valuable. They will then be able to build their own personal portfolios and establish an undeniable online and physical presence. We even offer a brief introduction to the general sustainability field, as well as suggest on-campus tools and search engines to find green jobs.
AASHE 2013 workshop facilitated by Mieko Ozeki, Sustainability Projects Coordinator at the University of Vermont, and Daniel Roth, Associate Director for Sustainability at Cornell University.
‘They treated us like one of them really’: Peer education as an approach to s...Simon Forrest
Powerpoint presentation about sexual health promotion for young people. By Dr Simon Forrest, Durham University(http://www.dur.ac.uk/school.health/staff/?username=wsrg35).
A way of looking at all of education and learning to promote discussion about the relationship between informal, non-formal & formal learning ahead of EU i2015. Can help thinking about; business models of institutions, the social processes of learning, learning resource design, OER co-creation of learning processes
Mahara and Collaboration: Building communities of practice.Mahara Hui
Presentation at Mahara Hui 2017 by Sue Smarti and Gwen Davitt (Te Rito Maioha Early Childhood New Zealand) in Auckland, New Zealand, on 7 April 2017.
YouTube presentation link can be found here: https://youtu.be/S2OTJX980SI
Have you ever “googled” yourself and wondered what you (and others) can find about yourself? Do you know what your personal brand is and what is a personal brand anyhow? This webinar will provide some insights on personal branding, exploring how you project yourself to others whether in-person or to a virtual community, and what your “reputation” means in a digital world. We will introduce some simple exercises for participants to explore their unique strengths with the intention of building a personal brand. We’ll transition into how you can project and build your personal brand into the social media/online world. Tools and techniques for personal branding will be suggested in this session.
AASHE 2014 Student Summit- Preparing for the Real World: Kickstarting Your Su...Mieko Ozeki
While students will still have to determine the exact career they would like to pursue, and maybe pick out what they will wear on interview day, at the end of the workshop they should hopefully have the rest covered. Attendees will assess their hard and soft skills, discover what work they enjoy, determine the assets they need to build, learn how to build a professional portfolio and learn how to create their own brand to set them apart. We hope to have students walk out of the presentation confident that they can handle the next steps to land their first job out of college. No matter their major, job experience, and extracurriculars, students will leave with a better appreciation of their strengths and understand there are multiple paths to be followed on the way to their dream green job. Attendees will learn about themselves through interactive activities, including mind mapping and writing their own compelling and engaging story. Attendees are encouraged to assess and reflect on their own personal experiences and passions to uncover what makes them unique and valuable. They will then be able to build their own personal portfolios and establish an undeniable online and physical presence. We even offer a brief introduction to the general sustainability field, as well as suggest on-campus tools and search engines to find green jobs.
AASHE 2013 workshop facilitated by Mieko Ozeki, Sustainability Projects Coordinator at the University of Vermont, and Daniel Roth, Associate Director for Sustainability at Cornell University.
Project Management Strategies for the Environmental LeaderMieko Ozeki
Do you feel like you have a million projects going on at your organization? Are you having a difficult time keeping track of and managing these projects? This webinar will discuss best practices for developing project management systems that optimize communication and effectively achieve short and long term project goals. The purpose of the presentation is to provide environmental leaders with a tool box of technical solutions to help organize the multitude of projects while preventing burn out and maintaining sanity.
Mieko Ozeki is the Sustainability Projects Coordinator at the University of Vermont and is a Senior Fellow of the Environmental Leadership Program.
Project Managing and Implementing STARS 2.1 processMieko Ozeki
Co-Presented at Northeast Campus Sustainability Consortium Conference on April 1, 2016 and Smart & Sustainable Campuses Conference on April 4, 2016 with Aaron Witham.
STARS submission requires a coordinated data collection effort across dozens of departments and individuals. This workshop walks through the project management process of implementing the data collection, reporting, and submission process. The University of Vermont’s Office of Sustainability will demonstrate the process, principles, and tools they use to implement the STARS 2.1 process. A starter kit will be demonstrated during this session.
Strengthening Relationships by Removing Blame: Constructive Relationships wit...Mieko Ozeki
Co-presented by Mieko Ozeki, Sustainability Projects Coordinator at the University of Vermont, and Dallase Scott, Sustainability Program Manager at GreenerU.
The Role of Sustainability in Career and Workforce DevelopmentMieko Ozeki
Presented at AASHE 2014 in Portland, OR in October 2014. Sustainability offices are in a unique position on campus. With the ability to work across departmental boundaries of campus on sustainability initiatives, our offices can provide professional development opportunities for students to work on while meeting project and program objectives. Internship programs give students the chance to develop their hard and soft skills, gain work experience, and cultivate a body of work for their portfolio; all within the relatively protected setting of an academic environment. This session focuses on how we can serve as workforce trainers and career development facilitators, suggesting best practices for designing and implementing an internship program within your office.
Strategic Renewable Energy Planning on Campus
Part of a workshop presented by Mieko A Ozeki, University of Vermont
This workshop will share lessons learned from two public institutions, University of Connecticut and the University of Vermont, that carried out comprehensive renewable energy feasibility studies and renewable energy plans on their respective campuses. Participants will break up into small groups to brainstorm ideas to implement a renewable energy and microgrid plan, and mindmap how these ideas can be tied to research, co-curricular education activities, green job opportunities, operations, and climate action planning on their respective campuses.
Green Funds 2.0 Nitty Gritty Of Campus Sustainability Fund ManagementMieko Ozeki
prepared by Mieko Ozeki, Katherine Walsh (UC Berkeley), Kevin Ordean (Northern Arizona University), Lilith Wyatt (McGill University), Melody Hartke (North American University), and McKenzie Beverage (University of Illinois- Urbana Champaign) and presented at the AASHE 2012 Conference.
A campus sustainability fund (also called green fund) is money available to campus community members for sustainability projects. Money for the fund may be from student fees, administrative budgets, or alumni donations and funding may be allocated in the form of grants or loans. Currently, there are over 175 green/sustainability funds in North America run by 155 institutions. Our goal as session leaders is to educate our audience beyond the basics of sustainability funds, by adhering to an overall theme of “So you have established a sustainability fund, what next?” We will cover case studies from six well-established sustainability funds and address key differences and patterns in how these funds have evolved in their management and processes.
Topics covered include: 1) strategies for soliciting sustainability projects; 2) criteria for projects: what can and cannot be funded; 3) project implementation plans and long-term support of projects beyond initial funding; 4) sustainability fund staffing and committee structures; 5) advising project leaders; and 6) and quantifying and reporting the metrics of funded projects.
Session leaders will break the 60–minute session into three 20-minute sections: (1) project solicitation and developing selection criteria with committees and staff; (2) project implementation, advising project leaders, and reporting structures; and (3) long-term integration of the fund and projects with institutional goals and structures. Each 20-minute section will include presentation from the session leaders and Q&A with the audience. The opening question we plan to answer is “What are we trying to accomplish with these funds?” and the concluding question we plan to answer is “What are the broad educational impacts of sustainability funds?” Post session we intend to create a white paper on best practices of managing a sustainability funds that will include case studies. This workshop is part of a series and a follow-up to Green Funds 1.0: Getting a Fund Started.
AASHE 2013 Green Fund Implementation Guide by Campus Green Fund CollaborativeMieko Ozeki
presented at AASHE 2013 by the Campus Green Fund Collaborative:
McKenzie Beverage, Butler University
Karen Blaney, University of Texas at Austin
Kevin Ordean, Northern Arizona University
Mieko A Ozeki, University of Vermont
Katherine Walsh, UC Berkeley
Lilith Wyatt, McGill University
Sustainability Officers 1.0 To 2.0 Toolkit Strategic And Sane Workload Manag...Mieko Ozeki
prepared by Mieko Ozeki, Lindsey Cromwell Kalkbrenner (Santa Clara University), Tavey McDaniel Capps (Duke University), and Smith Getterman (Baylor University) and presented at AASHE 2012 Conference.
Sustainability staff are involved in many initiatives at a time, and often these are run in collaboration with multiple stakeholders. The Sustainability Office version 1.0 consisted of one staffer--it was easy to determine priorities, manage work flow, and keep track of programs and contacts. The Sustainability Office version 2.0 consists of multiple staff (or students) and a bigger presence on campus. This means we are faced with more “hands in the toybox” and increasing demands from the campus community. How do we juggle multiple concurrent projects, share institutional memory, nurture relationships with campus contacts, repeat best practices, and avoid past mistakes? Overall, how do we create a sense of personal sustainability within the professional operation of our sustainability programs?
Sustainability officers from four universities will share strategies they use to seek balance in the workplace. Many tools exist to help (or hinder) our workflow and projects--we just need to identify our specific needs and determine which tool is best for our work environment. Panelists will share tools they use to increase efficiency when managing staff and students, organizing and tracking progress of multiple projects, documenting and sharing campus metrics, and effectively harness the power of collaboration with campus partners. Rather than simply describing the tools we use, and the purpose(s) they serve on our campuses, we will share our thought processes and strategies in tool selection.
Strengthening Relationships by Removing Blame: Constructive Relationships wit...Mieko Ozeki
Workshop presented at New England Campus Sustainability Forum in Boston, MA on September 20, 2013. This workshop focused on constructive conversations and applying systems thinking through mind-mapping.
Plenary session presented at the "Creating Communities of Learning" Australasian Professional Legal Education Conference, 14-15 November 2014 at AUT, Auckland
Deputy Director of the Rockefeller Center Sadhana Hall submitted an article on resilience to the publication 'Concepts & Connections', which released an issue on leadership competencies.
Chapter 1 of "Open Learning Cultures. A Guide to Quality, Evaluation and Asse...Ulf-Daniel Ehlers
THis book aims to provide three things:
- Details the influence of collaborative web-based technology on learning environments and learning behavior
- Provides educators, teachers, lecturers and students with a practical guide to developing customized quality concepts in open learning environments
- Includes guidelines, templates and use cases to facilitate the practical implementation of the methods presentedPresents a concept of quality control and assessments as an integral part of learning processes
AASHE 2014 Mind Mapping: A Systems Thinking Application for Change ManagementMieko Ozeki
A pre-conference workshop, co-facilitated at AASHE 2014 by Mieko Ozeki and Jenna Ringelheim. A growing number of students, faculty, and staff are increasingly concerned about their environmental impacts and demand immediate action to be taken. Despite good intentions, these same people can act in haste rather than strategically implementing a long term solution. This session will guide participants through the process of mind mapping, based on the frameworks of systems thinking, design thinking, and project management, to identify opportunities for collaboration and mitigating/managing risk. Workshop participants will learn about the process of mind mapping, a technique for visually diagramming information. They will be given an example of how a campus applies this technique to looking at a specific issues, develop and implement an action plan during the session. Mind mapping is a strategic planning process for implementing sustainability into institutional operations, academics, and planning, administration, and engagement. It applies systems thinking, design thinking, and project management. Participants will draft a mind map, scope statement, and task list that focuses on a current issue he/she is working on at their institution. The workshop provides sustainability officers with the space and time to think and construct a strategy for addressing an issue on campus. The workshop time is 15% presentation and 85% discussing/constructing a mindmap with partners. Be prepared for this work session and bring two problems we can work on together through this process.
Have you ever “googled” yourself and wondered what you (and others) can find about yourself? Do you know what your personal brand is and what is a personal brand anyhow? This webinar will provide some insights on personal branding, exploring how you project yourself to others whether in-person or to a virtual community, and what your “reputation” means in a digital world. We will introduce some simple exercises for participants to explore their unique strengths with the intention of building a personal brand. We’ll transition into how you can project and build your personal brand into the social media/online world. Tools and techniques for personal branding will be suggested in this session.
Presented by Jenna Ringelheim, National Program Director at the Environmental Leadership Program
Mieko A. Ozeki, ELP Senior Fellow, at miekoozeki.com
Leadership capacity, diversity, and communication in campus sustainability
1. MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC. • Vol. 5 No. 2 • April 2012 • DOI: 10.1089/sus.2012.9979 Sustainability 97
This roundtable discussion focuses on the
campus sustainability professional and
the skills and disposition needed to be an
effective sustainability leader in the world
of higher education. Participants are
campus sustainability officers and senior
fellows in the national Environmental
Leadership Program (ELP). An intensive
year-long program, the ELP trains the next
generation of environmental leaders, who
come from diverse backgrounds, to be
able to innovate and collaborate, and
have the know-how to effectively com-
municate with stakeholders. The program
calls upon a coordinated professional
network to ensure the senior fellows learn
from real-world experts. The following par-
ticipants and other ELP Fellows are working
across sectors to advance sustainability
in academia, business, government, and
nonprofit leadership.
Jesse Pyles: The term campus sustainability can
make us first think of the physical campus, but
our work, to varying degrees, encompasses a lot
more than managing the built environment. I tend
to talk about my role in terms of sustainability
education. How would you define sustainability
education?
Amber Garrard: Sustainability education is about
acquiring the skills to work across discipline and
departmental silos. It includes learning about how to
appreciate diverse perspectives and how to use our
differences to help us think creatively about complex
issues. Sustainability education is about helping peo-
ple understand that we live in a world of beautiful
and complex systems, and teaching and learning the
skills to appreciate the complexity of those systems.
Riley Neugebauer: I would define sustainability
education as education which results in students who
comprehend the interconnection between the three
E’s—ecology, equity, economy (a systems thinking
Leadership Capacity, Diversity,
and Communications
in Campus Sustainability
framework)—and then feel empowered to be able to
educate others about this and take action to create
more sustainable communities. Sustainability educa-
tion will provide them with an understanding of the
decline of the natural world and its relationship to
human development, which could then create more
of a context for the necessity of systems thinking in
our societies and decision-making structures.
Mieko Ozeki: Sustainability is interdisciplinary
by nature and a free exchange between theoretical
learning and real-world problem solving. Sustain-
ability is an underlying concept made explicit to
expound upon the connectivity of human, societal,
and ecological systems. I think sustainability educa-
tion makes us aware of the cognitive and physical
disconnects that exist within the human-oriented
systems, but it also offers opportunities to realign
and renew our values with the natural world.
Jesse Pyles: At Unity we’re sharpening our com-
munity focus around the tenets of sustainabil-
ity science as a framework for the education we
deliver for every student. This has direct implica-
tions for faculty, but it also influences the way I
view my role as a nonfaculty educator on campus.
In what ways do you fill the role of sustainability
educator and how does your location within the
organizational structure of the institution impact
that work?
Mieko Ozeki: Experiential education and ser-
vice learning are integral components to most
courses at the University of Vermont (UVM). This
allows us to develop projects that connect concepts
students learn in the classroom with real-world
issues occurring on campus or in the community. I
like taking my role as an educator one step further by
demonstrating professional skills such as project
management and helping students develop their
professional portfolios.
Amber Garrard: Yale’s approach to institutional sus-
tainability is largely directed toward campus systems
and culture. Educating all members of the commu-
nity is important to ensure they have the knowledge
Roundtable
Participants
Moderator
Jesse Pyles
Sustainability Coordinator
Unity College, Unity, ME
Senior Fellow, Environmental
Leadership Program
Amber Garrard
Education & Outreach Coordinator
Office of Sustainability, Yale University,
New Haven, CT
Senior Fellow, Environmental
Leadership Program
Riley Neugebauer
Sustainability Coordinator
Skidmore College, Saratoga Springs, NY
Senior Fellow, Environmental
Leadership Program
Mieko Ozeki
Projects Coordinator
Office of Sustainability, University
of Vermont, Burlington, VT
Senior Fellow, Environmental
Leadership Program
—Jesse Pyles
Our work encompasses
a lot more than
managing the built
environment.
2. 98 Sustainability MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC. • Vol. 5 No. 2 • April 2012 • DOI: 10.1089/sus.2012.9979
to change behavior and advocate for improvements
to the system. My role is to communicate sometimes
technical and complex information in a way that is
easily digestible and empowering. I love that this
role provides me the opportunity to work with many
sectors of the university—vice presidents as well as
custodial staff and action-oriented student leaders as
well as thought leaders.
Riley Neugebauer: I work with Skidmore students
as a mentor and supervisor through several intern-
ship and hired positions. I’m a frequent class visitor
and community resource on sustainability concepts
and engage others through college planning work.
I help students understand how to get things done
and how to take their own initiatives and make them
a reality. Beyond the conceptual ideas of sustainabil-
ity, I think it is even more important that I offer them
tangible ways to enact sustainability on campus. I
try to demonstrate more effective styles of commu-
nication and empowerment based in the idea that
accountability and collaborative decision making are
possible and can be effective.
Jesse Pyles: You’ve each touched on this notion of
empowering others on campus, not simply to be
effective institutional change agents, but also to
see themselves as educators. I consider the sus-
tainability education we’ve been discussing as a
toolkit of skills and competencies we can offer our
students. How does campus sustainability work
equip students to be engaged sustainability prac-
titioners in the 21st century?
Amber Garrard: Today’s college students are
living in an interesting time and many of them grasp
the severity of the future and are impressively opti-
mistic. Campus sustainability work encourages stu-
dents to use what they’re learning in the classroom
to change the world around them in creative and
new ways. Many students are looking for hands-on
opportunities to learn with their full beings, not just
their heads. Campus sustainability work, whether
through monitoring energy usage, sorting waste,
or growing produce for a dining hall, is providing
these types of opportunities that expose students to
transdisciplinary learning that will be very valuable
to them in the future.
Riley Neugebauer: The 21st century citizen has to
be flexible and adaptable to a constantly changing
world; whether because of technology or the decline
of the natural world, there are lots of things that are
changing fast. Sustainability work on campus, par-
ticularly when people are really in the early stages
of figuring out their career paths and evaluating
their value systems, can provide students with a
framework for change. This framework is based in
real projects and applied conversations, and gives
inspiration and hope that people can successfully
find ways to manage their communities, organiza-
tions, businesses, and beyond in a way that will allow
future generations the ability to thrive as well.
Jesse Pyles: I’d add that the solutions-focused,
problem-based work of campus sustainability
demands the development of highly transferable
skills: communications, project management, and
stakeholder engagement. What skills do you find
are most important to the sustainability education
work you do?
Riley Neugebauer: I think the skills most impor-
tant to this work include critical thinking, consen-
sus building, and community organizing. Skills in
nonviolent communication and conflict resolution,
cultural competency, and an understanding of white
privilege and race within the movement are key.
Mieko Ozeki: It is necessary to understand systems
and resource flows early on. Traditional education
approaches learning in a fragmented way, divvying
real-world situations into specific knowledge areas
and drawing away from the bigger picture. Seeing
the college campus as a whole rather than its parts
makes my job feel more manageable than over-
whelming.
Amber Garrard: Communication and respect for
people’s knowledge and experience—whatever that
may be. Much of my experience with this came from
traveling and meeting people in different places and
cultures. For me personally, this was important to
understanding why global sustainability is an issue
that needs to be addressed. It also helped me see that
there are often multiple ways of seeing and interpret-
ing the same thing or idea, and that learning to use
pluralistic approaches to problem solving is neces-
sary and advantageous.
Jesse Pyles: What do you wish you’d learned in
school to make you more effective in your work?
Mieko Ozeki: I wish I had learned about systems
thinking and putting it into practice—whether
through designing a policy or implementing a proj-
ect on campus. In higher education, academics are
broken up into disciplines. This is great for develop-
ing depth in a field, but loses sight of the intercon-
nection of these different knowledge areas. I feel
fortunate that in my undergraduate studies I studied
philosophy while taking interdisciplinary courses
between the humanities, arts, and sciences. If I’d
learned about systems thinking in my senior year, I
think it would have tied my learning together and
prepared me to look at organizational structures in
my career.
Riley Neugebauer: I would have liked to learn more
about leadership as related to working with and
Today’s college students
are living in an interesting
time and many of them
grasp the severity of
the future and are
impressively optimistic.
—Amber Garrard
The 21st century citizen
has to be flexible and
adaptable to a constantly
changing world; whether
because of technology
or the decline of the
natural world
—Riley Neugebauer
Roundtable
3. managing group process and strategic planning with
diverse stakeholders—basically more leadership and
management models and applications. I think the
earlier that students and others can become skilled
in things like nonviolent communication, cultural
competency, and conflict resolution, the easier the
ongoing conversations about change will be, and I
certainly wish I had developed those skills sooner
and had more of them now.
Jesse Pyles: I share that want for more process
management training. So much of the work we do
is about organizational maneuvering and admin-
istrative planning; process and project manage-
ment are crucial.
Ofcourse,theEnvironmentalLeadershipProgram
has introduced us to some of these skills through
trainings, but I find the greatest benefit of ELP has
been access to this diverse network of sustainabil-
ity leaders. I’ve learned a lot from the network and
gained a great deal from my collaboration with
you all. Thanks for your good thoughts and your
good work as sustainability education leaders.
Seeing the college
campus as a
whole rather than
its parts makes
my job feel more
manageable than
overewhelming.
—Mieko Ozeki
About the ELP Fellowship
The ELP Fellowship Program targets emerging environmental and social change practitioners eager
to connect their specialized work to larger environmental and social concerns. ELP is committed
to selecting a class of Fellows that represents diversity of race and ethnicity, gender, sector, sexual
orientation, education levels, professonal background, values and traditions, and environmental is-
sue expertise. The Fellowship Program offers intensive leadership and skill training, regional networking
opportunities, and time for personal and professional reflection. Consisting of three retreats and
additional optional trainings, the curriculum helps emerging leaders hone their leadership styles,
improve their strategic communications, and strengthen their outreach to diverse constituencies.
For more information on the ELP program, including Fellowship eligibility
and requirements, visit: www.elpnet.org/
MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC. • Vol. 5 No. 2 • April 2012 • DOI: 10.1089/sus.2012.9979 Sustainability 99