The Practical Playbook
National Meeting 2016
www.practicalplaybook.org
Bringing Public Health and Primary Care Together: The Practical Playbook National Meeting was at the Hyatt Regency in Bethesda, MD, May 22 - 24, 2016. The meeting was a milestone event towards advancing robust collaborations that improve population health. Key stakeholders from across sectors – representing professional associations, community organizations, government agencies and academic institutions – and across the country came together at the National Meeting to help catalyze a national movement, accelerate collaborations by fostering skill development, and connect with like-minded individuals and organizations to facilitate the exchange of ideas to drive population health improvement.
The National Meeting was also a significant source of tools and resources to advance collaboration. These tools and resources are available below and include:
Session presentations and materials
Poster session content
Photos from the National Meeting
The conversation started at the National Meeting is continuing in a LinkedIn Group "Working Together for Population Health" and Twitter. Use #PPBMeeting to provide feedback on the National Meeting.
The Practical Playbook was developed by the de Beaumont Foundation, the Duke University School of Medicine Department of Community and Family Medicine, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and the Health Resources & Services Administration (HRSA).
How to Make the Facts Matter: Using Data to Tell Your StoryPractical Playbook
by Elizabeth Jacob, Project Director, CityHealth.org
The Practical Playbook
National Meeting 2016
www.practicalplaybook.org
Bringing Public Health and Primary Care Together: The Practical Playbook National Meeting was at the Hyatt Regency in Bethesda, MD, May 22 - 24, 2016. The meeting was a milestone event towards advancing robust collaborations that improve population health. Key stakeholders from across sectors – representing professional associations, community organizations, government agencies and academic institutions – and across the country came together at the National Meeting to help catalyze a national movement, accelerate collaborations by fostering skill development, and connect with like-minded individuals and organizations to facilitate the exchange of ideas to drive population health improvement.
The National Meeting was also a significant source of tools and resources to advance collaboration. These tools and resources are available below and include:
Session presentations and materials
Poster session content
Photos from the National Meeting
The conversation started at the National Meeting is continuing in a LinkedIn Group "Working Together for Population Health" and Twitter. Use #PPBMeeting to provide feedback on the National Meeting.
The Practical Playbook was developed by the de Beaumont Foundation, the Duke University School of Medicine Department of Community and Family Medicine, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and the Health Resources & Services Administration (HRSA).
The Practical Playbook
National Meeting 2016
www.practicalplaybook.org
Bringing Public Health and Primary Care Together: The Practical Playbook National Meeting was at the Hyatt Regency in Bethesda, MD, May 22 - 24, 2016. The meeting was a milestone event towards advancing robust collaborations that improve population health. Key stakeholders from across sectors – representing professional associations, community organizations, government agencies and academic institutions – and across the country came together at the National Meeting to help catalyze a national movement, accelerate collaborations by fostering skill development, and connect with like-minded individuals and organizations to facilitate the exchange of ideas to drive population health improvement.
The National Meeting was also a significant source of tools and resources to advance collaboration. These tools and resources are available below and include:
Session presentations and materials
Poster session content
Photos from the National Meeting
The conversation started at the National Meeting is continuing in a LinkedIn Group "Working Together for Population Health" and Twitter. Use #PPBMeeting to provide feedback on the National Meeting.
The Practical Playbook was developed by the de Beaumont Foundation, the Duke University School of Medicine Department of Community and Family Medicine, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and the Health Resources & Services Administration (HRSA).
The Practical Playbook
National Meeting 2016
www.practicalplaybook.org
Bringing Public Health and Primary Care Together: The Practical Playbook National Meeting was at the Hyatt Regency in Bethesda, MD, May 22 - 24, 2016. The meeting was a milestone event towards advancing robust collaborations that improve population health. Key stakeholders from across sectors – representing professional associations, community organizations, government agencies and academic institutions – and across the country came together at the National Meeting to help catalyze a national movement, accelerate collaborations by fostering skill development, and connect with like-minded individuals and organizations to facilitate the exchange of ideas to drive population health improvement.
The National Meeting was also a significant source of tools and resources to advance collaboration. These tools and resources are available below and include:
Session presentations and materials
Poster session content
Photos from the National Meeting
The conversation started at the National Meeting is continuing in a LinkedIn Group "Working Together for Population Health" and Twitter. Use #PPBMeeting to provide feedback on the National Meeting.
The Practical Playbook was developed by the de Beaumont Foundation, the Duke University School of Medicine Department of Community and Family Medicine, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and the Health Resources & Services Administration (HRSA).
Health Impact Assessment: Healthier Places, Empowered PeoplePractical Playbook
The Practical Playbook
National Meeting 2016
www.practicalplaybook.org
Bringing Public Health and Primary Care Together: The Practical Playbook National Meeting was at the Hyatt Regency in Bethesda, MD, May 22 - 24, 2016. The meeting was a milestone event towards advancing robust collaborations that improve population health. Key stakeholders from across sectors – representing professional associations, community organizations, government agencies and academic institutions – and across the country came together at the National Meeting to help catalyze a national movement, accelerate collaborations by fostering skill development, and connect with like-minded individuals and organizations to facilitate the exchange of ideas to drive population health improvement.
The National Meeting was also a significant source of tools and resources to advance collaboration. These tools and resources are available below and include:
Session presentations and materials
Poster session content
Photos from the National Meeting
The conversation started at the National Meeting is continuing in a LinkedIn Group "Working Together for Population Health" and Twitter. Use #PPBMeeting to provide feedback on the National Meeting.
The Practical Playbook was developed by the de Beaumont Foundation, the Duke University School of Medicine Department of Community and Family Medicine, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and the Health Resources & Services Administration (HRSA).
BUILDing Multi-Sector Collaborations to Advance Community HealthPractical Playbook
The Practical Playbook
National Meeting 2016
www.practicalplaybook.org
Bringing Public Health and Primary Care Together: The Practical Playbook National Meeting was at the Hyatt Regency in Bethesda, MD, May 22 - 24, 2016. The meeting was a milestone event towards advancing robust collaborations that improve population health. Key stakeholders from across sectors – representing professional associations, community organizations, government agencies and academic institutions – and across the country came together at the National Meeting to help catalyze a national movement, accelerate collaborations by fostering skill development, and connect with like-minded individuals and organizations to facilitate the exchange of ideas to drive population health improvement.
The National Meeting was also a significant source of tools and resources to advance collaboration. These tools and resources are available below and include:
Session presentations and materials
Poster session content
Photos from the National Meeting
The conversation started at the National Meeting is continuing in a LinkedIn Group "Working Together for Population Health" and Twitter. Use #PPBMeeting to provide feedback on the National Meeting.
The Practical Playbook was developed by the de Beaumont Foundation, the Duke University School of Medicine Department of Community and Family Medicine, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and the Health Resources & Services Administration (HRSA).
How to Make the Facts Matter: Using Data to Tell Your StoryPractical Playbook
by Elizabeth Jacob, Project Director, CityHealth.org
The Practical Playbook
National Meeting 2016
www.practicalplaybook.org
Bringing Public Health and Primary Care Together: The Practical Playbook National Meeting was at the Hyatt Regency in Bethesda, MD, May 22 - 24, 2016. The meeting was a milestone event towards advancing robust collaborations that improve population health. Key stakeholders from across sectors – representing professional associations, community organizations, government agencies and academic institutions – and across the country came together at the National Meeting to help catalyze a national movement, accelerate collaborations by fostering skill development, and connect with like-minded individuals and organizations to facilitate the exchange of ideas to drive population health improvement.
The National Meeting was also a significant source of tools and resources to advance collaboration. These tools and resources are available below and include:
Session presentations and materials
Poster session content
Photos from the National Meeting
The conversation started at the National Meeting is continuing in a LinkedIn Group "Working Together for Population Health" and Twitter. Use #PPBMeeting to provide feedback on the National Meeting.
The Practical Playbook was developed by the de Beaumont Foundation, the Duke University School of Medicine Department of Community and Family Medicine, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and the Health Resources & Services Administration (HRSA).
The Practical Playbook
National Meeting 2016
www.practicalplaybook.org
Bringing Public Health and Primary Care Together: The Practical Playbook National Meeting was at the Hyatt Regency in Bethesda, MD, May 22 - 24, 2016. The meeting was a milestone event towards advancing robust collaborations that improve population health. Key stakeholders from across sectors – representing professional associations, community organizations, government agencies and academic institutions – and across the country came together at the National Meeting to help catalyze a national movement, accelerate collaborations by fostering skill development, and connect with like-minded individuals and organizations to facilitate the exchange of ideas to drive population health improvement.
The National Meeting was also a significant source of tools and resources to advance collaboration. These tools and resources are available below and include:
Session presentations and materials
Poster session content
Photos from the National Meeting
The conversation started at the National Meeting is continuing in a LinkedIn Group "Working Together for Population Health" and Twitter. Use #PPBMeeting to provide feedback on the National Meeting.
The Practical Playbook was developed by the de Beaumont Foundation, the Duke University School of Medicine Department of Community and Family Medicine, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and the Health Resources & Services Administration (HRSA).
The Practical Playbook
National Meeting 2016
www.practicalplaybook.org
Bringing Public Health and Primary Care Together: The Practical Playbook National Meeting was at the Hyatt Regency in Bethesda, MD, May 22 - 24, 2016. The meeting was a milestone event towards advancing robust collaborations that improve population health. Key stakeholders from across sectors – representing professional associations, community organizations, government agencies and academic institutions – and across the country came together at the National Meeting to help catalyze a national movement, accelerate collaborations by fostering skill development, and connect with like-minded individuals and organizations to facilitate the exchange of ideas to drive population health improvement.
The National Meeting was also a significant source of tools and resources to advance collaboration. These tools and resources are available below and include:
Session presentations and materials
Poster session content
Photos from the National Meeting
The conversation started at the National Meeting is continuing in a LinkedIn Group "Working Together for Population Health" and Twitter. Use #PPBMeeting to provide feedback on the National Meeting.
The Practical Playbook was developed by the de Beaumont Foundation, the Duke University School of Medicine Department of Community and Family Medicine, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and the Health Resources & Services Administration (HRSA).
Health Impact Assessment: Healthier Places, Empowered PeoplePractical Playbook
The Practical Playbook
National Meeting 2016
www.practicalplaybook.org
Bringing Public Health and Primary Care Together: The Practical Playbook National Meeting was at the Hyatt Regency in Bethesda, MD, May 22 - 24, 2016. The meeting was a milestone event towards advancing robust collaborations that improve population health. Key stakeholders from across sectors – representing professional associations, community organizations, government agencies and academic institutions – and across the country came together at the National Meeting to help catalyze a national movement, accelerate collaborations by fostering skill development, and connect with like-minded individuals and organizations to facilitate the exchange of ideas to drive population health improvement.
The National Meeting was also a significant source of tools and resources to advance collaboration. These tools and resources are available below and include:
Session presentations and materials
Poster session content
Photos from the National Meeting
The conversation started at the National Meeting is continuing in a LinkedIn Group "Working Together for Population Health" and Twitter. Use #PPBMeeting to provide feedback on the National Meeting.
The Practical Playbook was developed by the de Beaumont Foundation, the Duke University School of Medicine Department of Community and Family Medicine, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and the Health Resources & Services Administration (HRSA).
BUILDing Multi-Sector Collaborations to Advance Community HealthPractical Playbook
The Practical Playbook
National Meeting 2016
www.practicalplaybook.org
Bringing Public Health and Primary Care Together: The Practical Playbook National Meeting was at the Hyatt Regency in Bethesda, MD, May 22 - 24, 2016. The meeting was a milestone event towards advancing robust collaborations that improve population health. Key stakeholders from across sectors – representing professional associations, community organizations, government agencies and academic institutions – and across the country came together at the National Meeting to help catalyze a national movement, accelerate collaborations by fostering skill development, and connect with like-minded individuals and organizations to facilitate the exchange of ideas to drive population health improvement.
The National Meeting was also a significant source of tools and resources to advance collaboration. These tools and resources are available below and include:
Session presentations and materials
Poster session content
Photos from the National Meeting
The conversation started at the National Meeting is continuing in a LinkedIn Group "Working Together for Population Health" and Twitter. Use #PPBMeeting to provide feedback on the National Meeting.
The Practical Playbook was developed by the de Beaumont Foundation, the Duke University School of Medicine Department of Community and Family Medicine, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and the Health Resources & Services Administration (HRSA).
The Practical Playbook
National Meeting 2016
www.practicalplaybook.org
Bringing Public Health and Primary Care Together: The Practical Playbook National Meeting was at the Hyatt Regency in Bethesda, MD, May 22 - 24, 2016. The meeting was a milestone event towards advancing robust collaborations that improve population health. Key stakeholders from across sectors – representing professional associations, community organizations, government agencies and academic institutions – and across the country came together at the National Meeting to help catalyze a national movement, accelerate collaborations by fostering skill development, and connect with like-minded individuals and organizations to facilitate the exchange of ideas to drive population health improvement.
The National Meeting was also a significant source of tools and resources to advance collaboration. These tools and resources are available below and include:
Session presentations and materials
Poster session content
Photos from the National Meeting
The conversation started at the National Meeting is continuing in a LinkedIn Group "Working Together for Population Health" and Twitter. Use #PPBMeeting to provide feedback on the National Meeting.
The Practical Playbook was developed by the de Beaumont Foundation, the Duke University School of Medicine Department of Community and Family Medicine, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and the Health Resources & Services Administration (HRSA).
Health Datapalooza 2013: Hearing from the Community - Jean NudelmanHealth Data Consortium
Health Datapalooza IV: June 3rd-4th, 2013
Hearing from the Community: Where We Are and Where We Would Like to Be
Moderator:
Edward J. Sondik, former Director, National Center for Health Statistics
Speakers:
Georges Benjamin, Executive Director, American Public Health Association (APHA)
Samuel ‘Woodie’ Kessel, Professor, University of Maryland School of Public Health
Patrick Remington, Associate Dean for Public Health, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health
Jean Nudelman, Director, Community Benefits Programs, Kaiser Permanente
Donald F. Schwarz, Health Commissioner, Deputy Mayor for Health and Opportunity, City of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Afshin Khosravii, Chief Executive Officer, Trilogy Integrated Resources
Richard Martin, Vice President, Heritage Provider Network
This session will focus on advances in the use of health data in developing or implementing new tools that impact local community health. It will explore the data and technology needs of local community health organizations and discuss the challenges they face when attempting to meet these needs. It will also present recommendations from non-data oriented people regarding opportunities in the data and technology fields that could enhance their experience in local community health.
Place-Based Decision Making Grounded in Community Processes and Data Visualiz...Practical Playbook
The Practical Playbook
National Meeting 2016
www.practicalplaybook.org
Bringing Public Health and Primary Care Together: The Practical Playbook National Meeting was at the Hyatt Regency in Bethesda, MD, May 22 - 24, 2016. The meeting was a milestone event towards advancing robust collaborations that improve population health. Key stakeholders from across sectors – representing professional associations, community organizations, government agencies and academic institutions – and across the country came together at the National Meeting to help catalyze a national movement, accelerate collaborations by fostering skill development, and connect with like-minded individuals and organizations to facilitate the exchange of ideas to drive population health improvement.
The National Meeting was also a significant source of tools and resources to advance collaboration. These tools and resources are available below and include:
Session presentations and materials
Poster session content
Photos from the National Meeting
The conversation started at the National Meeting is continuing in a LinkedIn Group "Working Together for Population Health" and Twitter. Use #PPBMeeting to provide feedback on the National Meeting.
The Practical Playbook was developed by the de Beaumont Foundation, the Duke University School of Medicine Department of Community and Family Medicine, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and Health Resources & Services Administration (HRSA).
Building Capacity to Improve Population Health using a Social Determinants of...Practical Playbook
The Practical Playbook
National Meeting 2016
www.practicalplaybook.org
Bringing Public Health and Primary Care Together: The Practical Playbook National Meeting was at the Hyatt Regency in Bethesda, MD, May 22 - 24, 2016. The meeting was a milestone event towards advancing robust collaborations that improve population health. Key stakeholders from across sectors – representing professional associations, community organizations, government agencies and academic institutions – and across the country came together at the National Meeting to help catalyze a national movement, accelerate collaborations by fostering skill development, and connect with like-minded individuals and organizations to facilitate the exchange of ideas to drive population health improvement.
The National Meeting was also a significant source of tools and resources to advance collaboration. These tools and resources are available below and include:
Session presentations and materials
Poster session content
Photos from the National Meeting
The conversation started at the National Meeting is continuing in a LinkedIn Group "Working Together for Population Health" and Twitter. Use #PPBMeeting to provide feedback on the National Meeting.
The Practical Playbook was developed by the de Beaumont Foundation, the Duke University School of Medicine Department of Community and Family Medicine, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and the Health Resources & Services Administration (HRSA).
From Advocacy to Accountability: Empowering communities throughout the UHC Pr...HFG Project
This presentation was presented by Ricardo Valladares Cardona at a side session at the Prince Mahidol Award Conference (PMAC) in Bangkok, Thailand, on January 29, 2017.
What is implementation science and why should you careLisa Muldrew
This seminar will discuss the emerging field of implementation science with a focus on its application within clinical settings. Topics will include an overview of implementation science, how implementation science is positioned within the translation continuum, common conceptual models and analytic frameworks used in implementation science and a study example.
Construction of an Implementation Science for Scaling Out Interventions HopkinsCFAR
The Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health Center for Implementation Research
The Johns Hopkins Center for AIDS Research
& the Dean’s Office invite you to
The Center for Implementation Research Implementation Science Speaker Series
Construction of an Implementation Science for Scaling Out Interventions
Wednesday, May 7, 2014
12:15pm – 1:15pm
W1020 Becton Dickinson – 615 N. Wolfe Street
C Hendricks Brown, Ph. D.
Director, Center for Prevention Implementation Methodology (Ce-PIM)
Director, Prevention Science and Methodology Group (PSMG)
Professor, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences and Department of Preventive Medicine
Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine
The Practical Playbook
National Meeting 2016
www.practicalplaybook.org
Bringing Public Health and Primary Care Together: The Practical Playbook National Meeting was at the Hyatt Regency in Bethesda, MD, May 22 - 24, 2016. The meeting was a milestone event towards advancing robust collaborations that improve population health. Key stakeholders from across sectors – representing professional associations, community organizations, government agencies and academic institutions – and across the country came together at the National Meeting to help catalyze a national movement, accelerate collaborations by fostering skill development, and connect with like-minded individuals and organizations to facilitate the exchange of ideas to drive population health improvement.
The National Meeting was also a significant source of tools and resources to advance collaboration. These tools and resources are available below and include:
Session presentations and materials
Poster session content
Photos from the National Meeting
The conversation started at the National Meeting is continuing in a LinkedIn Group "Working Together for Population Health" and Twitter. Use #PPBMeeting to provide feedback on the National Meeting.
The Practical Playbook was developed by the de Beaumont Foundation, the Duke University School of Medicine Department of Community and Family Medicine, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and the Health Resources & Services Administration (HRSA).
Health Datapalooza 2013: Hearing from the Community - Jean NudelmanHealth Data Consortium
Health Datapalooza IV: June 3rd-4th, 2013
Hearing from the Community: Where We Are and Where We Would Like to Be
Moderator:
Edward J. Sondik, former Director, National Center for Health Statistics
Speakers:
Georges Benjamin, Executive Director, American Public Health Association (APHA)
Samuel ‘Woodie’ Kessel, Professor, University of Maryland School of Public Health
Patrick Remington, Associate Dean for Public Health, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health
Jean Nudelman, Director, Community Benefits Programs, Kaiser Permanente
Donald F. Schwarz, Health Commissioner, Deputy Mayor for Health and Opportunity, City of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Afshin Khosravii, Chief Executive Officer, Trilogy Integrated Resources
Richard Martin, Vice President, Heritage Provider Network
This session will focus on advances in the use of health data in developing or implementing new tools that impact local community health. It will explore the data and technology needs of local community health organizations and discuss the challenges they face when attempting to meet these needs. It will also present recommendations from non-data oriented people regarding opportunities in the data and technology fields that could enhance their experience in local community health.
Place-Based Decision Making Grounded in Community Processes and Data Visualiz...Practical Playbook
The Practical Playbook
National Meeting 2016
www.practicalplaybook.org
Bringing Public Health and Primary Care Together: The Practical Playbook National Meeting was at the Hyatt Regency in Bethesda, MD, May 22 - 24, 2016. The meeting was a milestone event towards advancing robust collaborations that improve population health. Key stakeholders from across sectors – representing professional associations, community organizations, government agencies and academic institutions – and across the country came together at the National Meeting to help catalyze a national movement, accelerate collaborations by fostering skill development, and connect with like-minded individuals and organizations to facilitate the exchange of ideas to drive population health improvement.
The National Meeting was also a significant source of tools and resources to advance collaboration. These tools and resources are available below and include:
Session presentations and materials
Poster session content
Photos from the National Meeting
The conversation started at the National Meeting is continuing in a LinkedIn Group "Working Together for Population Health" and Twitter. Use #PPBMeeting to provide feedback on the National Meeting.
The Practical Playbook was developed by the de Beaumont Foundation, the Duke University School of Medicine Department of Community and Family Medicine, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and Health Resources & Services Administration (HRSA).
Building Capacity to Improve Population Health using a Social Determinants of...Practical Playbook
The Practical Playbook
National Meeting 2016
www.practicalplaybook.org
Bringing Public Health and Primary Care Together: The Practical Playbook National Meeting was at the Hyatt Regency in Bethesda, MD, May 22 - 24, 2016. The meeting was a milestone event towards advancing robust collaborations that improve population health. Key stakeholders from across sectors – representing professional associations, community organizations, government agencies and academic institutions – and across the country came together at the National Meeting to help catalyze a national movement, accelerate collaborations by fostering skill development, and connect with like-minded individuals and organizations to facilitate the exchange of ideas to drive population health improvement.
The National Meeting was also a significant source of tools and resources to advance collaboration. These tools and resources are available below and include:
Session presentations and materials
Poster session content
Photos from the National Meeting
The conversation started at the National Meeting is continuing in a LinkedIn Group "Working Together for Population Health" and Twitter. Use #PPBMeeting to provide feedback on the National Meeting.
The Practical Playbook was developed by the de Beaumont Foundation, the Duke University School of Medicine Department of Community and Family Medicine, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and the Health Resources & Services Administration (HRSA).
From Advocacy to Accountability: Empowering communities throughout the UHC Pr...HFG Project
This presentation was presented by Ricardo Valladares Cardona at a side session at the Prince Mahidol Award Conference (PMAC) in Bangkok, Thailand, on January 29, 2017.
What is implementation science and why should you careLisa Muldrew
This seminar will discuss the emerging field of implementation science with a focus on its application within clinical settings. Topics will include an overview of implementation science, how implementation science is positioned within the translation continuum, common conceptual models and analytic frameworks used in implementation science and a study example.
Construction of an Implementation Science for Scaling Out Interventions HopkinsCFAR
The Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health Center for Implementation Research
The Johns Hopkins Center for AIDS Research
& the Dean’s Office invite you to
The Center for Implementation Research Implementation Science Speaker Series
Construction of an Implementation Science for Scaling Out Interventions
Wednesday, May 7, 2014
12:15pm – 1:15pm
W1020 Becton Dickinson – 615 N. Wolfe Street
C Hendricks Brown, Ph. D.
Director, Center for Prevention Implementation Methodology (Ce-PIM)
Director, Prevention Science and Methodology Group (PSMG)
Professor, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences and Department of Preventive Medicine
Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine
Practical Enterprise Architecture in Medium-size Corporation using TOGAFMichael Sukachev
Overview on the Practical Enterprise Architecture approach using TOGAF ADM for architectures development, Zachman Framework as artifacts repository and Sparx EA as a modelling tool.
Induction training helps in the integration of newly-hired employees in and across the organization. Let's look at a presentation on "Successful Implementation of Induction Program for New Hires".
172017 Public Health What It Is and How It Workshttps.docxfelicidaddinwoodie
1/7/2017 Public Health: What It Is and How It Works
https://bookshelf.vitalsource.com/#/books/9781284046342/cfi/12!/4/2/22/6/[email protected]:33.0 1/2
PRINTED BY: [email protected] Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book
may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior permission. Violators will be prosecuted.
mobilization and constituency building. PATCH focuses on orienting and training community leaders and other
community participants in all aspects of the community needs assessment process and includes excellent
documentation and resource materials. Although originally developed by the Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention (CDC) to focus on chronic health conditions and stimulate health promotion and disease prevention
interventions, PATCH is flexible enough to be used in a wide variety of community health needs assessment
applications.
Another important tool for addressing public health core functions and their associated processes is Model
Standards, Healthy Communities.8 The steps outlined for implementation of the Model Standards process in the
community link many of the various core functionrelated tools; they represent, in effect, a pathway for
organizations to participate in community health improvement activities.
1. Assessment of organizational role. Communities are organized and structured differently. As a result, the
specific roles of local public health organizations will vary from community to community. An essential
first step is to reexamine organizational purpose and mission and develop a longrange vision through
strategic planning involving its internal and external constituencies. The resulting mission statement and
longrange vision serve to guide the organization (leadership and board, as well as employees) and to define
it for its community partners. This critical step should be completed before the remaining steps can be
successfully addressed. Part I of APEXPH and the expanded strategic planning elements of MAPP are
useful in accomplishing this task.
2. Assessment of organizational capacity. After mission and role have been defined, it is necessary to
examine an organization’s capacity to carry out its role in the community. This calls for an assessment of
the major operational elements of the organization, including its structure and performance for specific
tasks. This type of organizational and local public health system selfassessment is best carried out through
broad participation from all levels. Both APEXPH and MAPP include hundreds of indicators that can be
used in this capacity assessment. These indicators can be modified or eliminated if deemed inappropriate,
and additional indicators can also be used. This step serves to identify strengths and weaknesses relative to
mission and role.
3. Development of a capacitybuilding plan. The development of a capacitybuilding plan incorporates the
organization’s strengths and prioritizes its weaknesses so that the m ...
Process of Planning and EvaluationThe process of planning and ev.docxstilliegeorgiana
Process of Planning and Evaluation
The process of planning and evaluation is cyclical and their activities are interdependent. The activities happen in stages; the end of one activity or program leads to the next. The ideas, insights, and learning derived from a particular stage are likely to affect the decisions and activities of the next stage.
Despite this, the process of planning and evaluation is usually presented in a linear manner with sequential steps. The cycle is often affected by external influences. Planners and evaluators need to be flexible in responding to these influences
Health Program Models
Good health programs involve a good deal of effort and a well-developed model. These models provide direction and structure to the program to be built on. The models may not be used completely during the planning process, or various parts of the model may be combined to suit the program. There are some commonly used models in health program planning:
· Predisposing, Reinforcing, and Enabling Constructs in Educational Diagnosis and Evaluation (PRECEDE)-Policy, Regulatory, and Organizational Constructs in Educational and Environmental Development (PROCEED): Commonly known as the PRECEDE-PROCEED model, it is the most well-known model in this field because it is theoretically grounded and comprehensive. Planning, implementation, and evaluation are all combined in this model.
· The Model for Health Education Planning (MHEP) analyzes:
· Planning through six phases
· Content through three dimensions―subject matter, method, and process
· The Comprehensive Health Education Model (CHEM) consists of six major steps and several suggested procedures within each step.
· The Model for Health Education Planning and Resource Development (MHEPRD) is a less known model. The five major components of this model are―health education plans, demonstration programs, educational programs, research programs, and information and statistics. Each component represents the end result of the planning process. In this model, evaluation plays an integral part in each phase of the model.
Written Assignment 1: Quality of Simulation
Chapter 3 discusses methods to assess the quality of simulations. You learned about three different views of simulation quality.
Suppose you lead a task force that is developing a simulation to provide strategic planning recommendations for property use zoning for a county of 750,000 residents. The zoning board and county commissioners want a simulation that allows them to assess the impact of various zoning decisions based on a variety of dynamic factors, including age, race, education, and income status.
Submit a 2-page (double-spaced) paper addressing the following:
1. First, identify which of the three views discussed in the chapter that would provide the best quality assessment for the situation described above, and explain your decision.
2. Explain how would you ensure the highest level of accuracy with your simulation, and how w ...
How to Improve Healthcare Reporting Management System.pptxFlutter Agency
Here in this article, you will see the tips about the healthcare reporting management system. Read these top 8 tips to improve the Healthcare Reporting Management System.
HCM 3305, Community Health 1 Course Learning Outcom.docxaryan532920
HCM 3305, Community Health 1
Course Learning Outcomes for Unit VIII
Upon completion of this unit, students should be able to:
3. Recognize effective organization and promotion of health programming for community health on a
global scale.
3.1. Assess the steps for organizing a community health program.
3.2. Identify steps needed to effectively evaluate the community health program.
Reading Assignment
Chapter 15:
Systems Thinking and Leadership in Community and Public Health
Unit Lesson
In this unit, we will discuss systems thinking and community health programming.
Community organizing is a process that involves the engagement of individuals, groups, and organizations.
Program planning is not required in community organizing; however, it is often times used. Program planning
is a process where a health intervention is planned to meet the needs within a population. Antiviolence
campaigns and stress management courses are examples of program planning (McKenzie, Pinger, & Kotecki,
2012).
When deciding which community health interventions to create, the Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention (CDC) uses Guide to Community Preventive Services (Community Guide). The Community Guide
is considered credible because it is based off the scientific systematic review process. The guide answers
many questions that are critical to community health on subjects such as
interventions that have worked/did not work,
populations in which the intervention worked/did not work,
cost of the intervention,
benefits/risks of the intervention, and
future research recommendations (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2015).
Community health programs are intricate and are a key factor in disease prevention, improving health, and
increasing quality of life. Health status and behaviors are determined by personal, environmental, policy, and
organizational influences. Community health programming is targeted at reaching the goals of Healthy People
2010. Community health programs are generally held within healthcare settings; however, other settings are
becoming more popular. Programs are being held at schools, worksites, religious organizations, and within
communities (Healthy People 2020, 2015). There are instances where healthcare organizations are
collaborating with schools to offer health programs. For instance, nutrition and exercise programs are being
offered at an increased rate. Employers see the value of employee health. Therefore, many employers offer
incentives to employees who take part in employee wellness programs. It is not far fetched to hear about
employers checking cholesterol, blood pressure, quality of life, weight, BMI, and sometimes glucose. The
rationale is that healthy employees are less likely to call in sick with health-related conditions.
Community health professionals must identify their health issue, and then create specific and measurable
goals and objectives. ...
Community Health Assessments and Continuous Quality ImprovementP.docxcargillfilberto
Community Health Assessments and Continuous Quality Improvement
Part 1
In its report "The Future of Public Health," the Institute of Medicine of the National Academies (1988) recognizes assessments of community health status and community health needs as a core public health function. The course textbook states that some of the goals of community health assessment are to evaluate health status, identify community health needs, identify strengths and weaknesses of a community's health systems, recommend strategies to address community health needs, and locate existing or needed resources to meet identified needs.
Read the report and based on it, respond to the following questions in relation to the role of community members:
What role or roles should community members have in a community needs assessment? Justify your answer.
What are some strategies for engaging community members?
Public health agencies use data to identify health problems, establish and track health objectives, and assess the effectiveness of policies, programs, and services.
Respond to the following questions in relation to community needs assessment:
Which key factors are important to consider when gathering and presenting data for a community needs assessment?
When presenting data, which strategies would you recommend for creating a strong and compelling statement of need?
Part 2
Continuous quality improvement (CQI) refers to the process of continually assessing and adjusting a program or service components to address problems or enhance results. The CQI process is dynamic and ongoing, guided by input or feedback from individuals receiving the services. Additionally, buy-in and support from the staff, particularly staff responsible for implementing program changes, are critical to an agency's CQI efforts. Selecting the right individual to lead an agency's CQI efforts is important if these criteria are to be achieved.
Using the South University Online Library or the Internet, research about CQI in public health systems.
Based on your research, respond to the following discussion points in relation to CQI activities:
Describe the ideal traits or characteristics of the person or team who would spearhead the CQI process.
Examine how CQI leaders can garner support and buy-in from staff responsible for CQI activities.
CQI leaders are critical to the success of an agency's CQI efforts. Effective CQI leaders help establish a shared vision and purpose provide direction, and ensure the availability of resources and the right environment required for success.
Respond to the following discussion points in relation to managing CQI efforts:
Examine the advantages and disadvantages of assigning an existing staff person to manage CQI efforts versus engaging an external contractor.
Explain which of the two you would recommend for managing CQI efforts.
Reference:
Institute of Medicine of the National Academies. (1988).
The future of public health
. Retrieved f.
Running Head INITIAL PROPOSAL1INITIAL PROPOSAL6.docxcowinhelen
Running Head: INITIAL PROPOSAL 1
INITIAL PROPOSAL 6
Initial proposal
Joe-Anne McCormick
MHA 616 Health Care Management Information Systems
Dr. Mohammad Bajwa
March 22, 2017
Planning
Project Porposal/Problem statement
Studies have proved that life expectancy in the United States fares poorly at the international level (Oeppen & Vaupel, 2012). That does not mean that the country is not doing enough to improve the quality of healthcare in the country. In 2007, the United States government spent 16% of its GDP on healthcare an amount that was inherently higher compared to that of any other country (Preston & Ho, 2009). Hence, it is not the healthcare system that is inefficient. Instead, the problem is that there are a number of behavioral factors that are associated with the citizens that have contributed to the high mortality rate in the country (Preston & Ho, 2009).
SMART Objectives
1. The United States healthcare stakeholders will launch public sensitization practice about cancer resulting in 300,000 estimated cancer deaths from 595,690 by 2021.
2. Healthcare institutions will use quality improvement approaches resulting in 50% reduction in the rate of hospital readmissions by 2023.
3. Healthcare stakeholders will sensitize the United States citizens about the effects of smoking resulting in less than 12% adult smoking rate from 16.8% by 2020.
4. The media and other healthcare stakeholders will educate the members of the public about the importance of taking part in exercise activities resulting in 51% obese adults from 68.8% by 2021.
5. The media and other healthcare stakeholders will educate the members of the public about the importance of taking part in exercise activities resulting in 250,000 heart disease deaths from 375,00 by 2023.
Team members
The success of the project will require the contribution of the healthcare staff, teachers, other students, the community educators and the media.
Background
Evidence about the state of healthcare in the United States and the rate of mortality can be found in peer reviewed articles, books, magazines and internet sources. Hence, the sources will be used to set up the procedures and overall planning for the project.
Current/ideal state
The current rate of mortality in the United States fares poorly at the international level. In retrospect to that, the United States is also the highest spender in the sector of healthcare. The country spent $3.2 trillion on healthcare in 2016 implying that the core contributing factor to the high mortality rate in the country is not entirely tied down to the healthcare system but rather on the behavior and lifestyles of the people. Therefore, improvement is required because with the current trend in lifestyle, failing to take actions will worsen the state of mortality in the future. The current healthcare system does not redirect a lot of focus on public participation. For instance, only 12% of the United States adults have proficie ...
1INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS2 1 Aggression and Violence.docxfelicidaddinwoodie
1
INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS
2
1: Aggression and Violence
Aggression is, “an act or behavior that intentionally hurts another person, either physically or psychologically” (Matsumoto & Juang, 2008, p. 389). While some expressions of aggression are universal, cross-cultural differences exist in the type and level of aggression that are considered to be legally or socially sanctioned. There have been multiple reasons proposed by theorists to explain these cultural differences in the type (verbal, physical, etc.) and level of aggression expressed across cultures.
For this Discussion,review this week’s Learning Resources. Select a culture and consider how this culture expresses aggression.
With these thoughts in mind:
a brief description of the culture you selected. Provide an example of a behavior that may be perceived as aggressive by culture you selected and explain why. Then, provide an example of a behavior that may be perceived as aggressive across most cultures and explain why. Finally explain how socially sanctioned violence is acceptable within certain cultures. Support your responses using the Learning Resources and the current literature.
.
Reference:
Matsumoto, D., & Juang, L. (2008). Culture and psychology (4th ed.). Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth.
2: Attribution
“Not only do people bolster beliefs in their ability to control in response to successful control of an event but also they hold an unwarranted belief that they can control chance events,” states Yamaguchi (Matsumoto (Ed.), 2001, pp. 226–227) in the course text. While members of all cultures have the goal of protecting self-image following failures, differences exist among cultures in terms of the attributions made for the failure and success of a task. Thus, while the self-serving bias is universally applied, the specific attributions made differ cross-culturally. In some cultures, it is assumed that failure is attributable to situational factors while others assume dispositional factors.
Differences also exist in how the failure or success of another individual is attributed. Consider the relevance of attributions for success and failure for the scholar-practitioner working in a multicultural environment or in a global company. How would knowledge of how individuals’ attribute their own or others failure impact a team, classroom, or organization?
For this Discussion, imagine that a group of business people from two different cultures (one from a collectivistic culture and another from an individualistic culture) work together on a business project, and at the end, the project fails. Consider how people from individualistic and collectivistic cultures respond to failure and the factors to which they would most likely attribute their failures.
With these thoughts in mind:
a brief comparison of the similarities and differences of attribution styles in individualistic and collectivistic cultures. Then provide an example of a group situation in which a proj ...
Running head: QUALITY IMPROVEMENT
Quality improvement 1
Introduction
Health care system consists of various areas that have different functions, and these areas need improvement from time to time to improve the quality of services offered. One of these areas is health care literacy of patients especially the least served; it is defined as the ability of people to access, process and understand basic health information (Lie et al., 2012). An elaborate quality improvement is needed to ensure the provision of quality services. Therefore in a quality improvement plan, each and everyone has a role to play. From the board of directors, middle to department staff in data collection and reporting, reporting implementation progress, orientation and education of staff about the plan and finally evaluation of the plan. Comment by Earl: ok
Roles
Board of directors need to review the quality improvement plan, once approved oversee its implementation by CEO, directors, managers and the staff. Executive leadership oversees the implementation of the plan by the staff. The quality improvement committee analyzes the performance data, evaluates the data and determines the effectiveness of the plan, and makes recommendations on the progress. Medical staffs implement the quality improvement plan. Middle management manages staff and ensures implementation of the plan and is answerable to the executive leadership. The departmental staff handles ensuring that they play their specific role required of them in the implementation of the plan that involves their department (Barrera Jr et al., 2013). Comment by Earl: Discuss roles specific to your project in depth – this is too generic
Data collection and data reporting
Quality improvement committee handles data collection and reporting. The committee should collect data, evaluate and analyzes it and make the necessary recommendations. If the plan is adopted, they determine the functionality of the plan and what changes need to be made to ensure its effectiveness. Comment by Earl: Be specific; explore in more depth
The board of management responsible for reviewing the recommendations and decides whether to adopt them or not. Once they approve they give a go-ahead for its implementation. The management team will take the responsibility of overseeing its implementation.
Changes implemented
There are various changes that need to be implemented to improve health literacy among patients, especially in the underserved population. Firstly is to promote universal access to health information. There needs to be readily accessible health either through their Internet or read materials such as brochures to every patient and should be presented in the simplest manner for the patients to understand..
Public Health Agencies have been primed by the CDC to Strengthen Public Health Infrastructure for Improved Health Outcomes by becoming Enterprise Performance Management focused organizations.
The question many Public Health Officials are asking:“So...how do we do it?”
Discussion QuestionPlease provide at least a 250-word response,.docxpauline234567
Discussion Question:
Please provide at least a 250-word response, utilizing references from the text and/or supplemental reading. Please also be sure to respond to at least two of your peers on the forum.
It is obviously important when defining a project that the leaders have a clear perspective as to the direction of the project and the needs of the stakeholders. In the readings for this chapter the authors talked about the “power/interest” map for assessing stakeholders. Describe how this process works and its application. What are its advantages? How do you see this concept working in a modern organizational setting where a multitude of projects could be executed at any given moment?
Discussion Question:
iscussion Question:
Please provide at least a 250 word response, utilizing references from the text and/or supplemental reading. Please also be sure to respond to at least two of your peers on the forum.
Clearly the conceptualization of structures is very important in defining a project en route to execution. The authors of this text talked about both the work break down structure (WBS) as well as the process break down structure (PBS) describe both of these processes and articulate their application. Make sure that you discuss thoroughly the circumstances in which these tools are utilized and how they can be successfully implemented today. Make sure that you utilize specific references to the text in responding to this discussion question.
1
POLICY PROPOSAL
Introduction
Throughout this paper, I will explain why Mercy Health's suggested metric benchmarks fall short and why an organizational policy is needed to fix them. Second, highlight potential environmental factors and their effects on those strategies and provide ethically based strategies to improve metric performance issues. Thirdly, make a concise policy plan and offer suggestions for resolving performance issues concerning local, state, or federal policies. Finally, discuss stakeholders and group participation's role in successfully implementing procedures.
Proposed Change to Organizational Policy
Mercy Health's current benchmark was established to provide services of the highest possible quality in diabetes screening and prevention. In 2016 and 2017, there were three options for testing. Eye, foot, and HgbA1C tests were part of the testing. Each quarter's goals were established as suggested benchmarks for the provided services. The proposed benchmark exams were 45 for the eyes, 80 for the feet, and 140 for Hgb1Ac testing. The standard recommendations for all three services were below par, necessitating action to increase patient and community involvement. The underperformance of the benchmarks demonstrates a gap between community involvement in healthy living and practices and the hospital. As testing decreases, community illness rises, and health outcomes fall in the opposite direction. This affects care quality. African Americans, Caucasians, and American India.
Similar to A Framework for Healthcare and Public Health Collaboration: The Population Health Driver Diagram (20)
The Theory and Action of Running a Breakthrough Collaborative: Using a Networ...Practical Playbook
The Theory and Action of Running a Breakthrough Collaborative: Using a Network-Centric Approach Framed Using Doug Engelbart's Idea of Networked Improvement Communities
Antibiotic Stewardship by Anushri Srivastava.pptxAnushriSrivastav
Stewardship is the act of taking good care of something.
Antimicrobial stewardship is a coordinated program that promotes the appropriate use of antimicrobials (including antibiotics), improves patient outcomes, reduces microbial resistance, and decreases the spread of infections caused by multidrug-resistant organisms.
WHO launched the Global Antimicrobial Resistance and Use Surveillance System (GLASS) in 2015 to fill knowledge gaps and inform strategies at all levels.
ACCORDING TO apic.org,
Antimicrobial stewardship is a coordinated program that promotes the appropriate use of antimicrobials (including antibiotics), improves patient outcomes, reduces microbial resistance, and decreases the spread of infections caused by multidrug-resistant organisms.
ACCORDING TO pewtrusts.org,
Antibiotic stewardship refers to efforts in doctors’ offices, hospitals, long term care facilities, and other health care settings to ensure that antibiotics are used only when necessary and appropriate
According to WHO,
Antimicrobial stewardship is a systematic approach to educate and support health care professionals to follow evidence-based guidelines for prescribing and administering antimicrobials
In 1996, John McGowan and Dale Gerding first applied the term antimicrobial stewardship, where they suggested a causal association between antimicrobial agent use and resistance. They also focused on the urgency of large-scale controlled trials of antimicrobial-use regulation employing sophisticated epidemiologic methods, molecular typing, and precise resistance mechanism analysis.
Antimicrobial Stewardship(AMS) refers to the optimal selection, dosing, and duration of antimicrobial treatment resulting in the best clinical outcome with minimal side effects to the patients and minimal impact on subsequent resistance.
According to the 2019 report, in the US, more than 2.8 million antibiotic-resistant infections occur each year, and more than 35000 people die. In addition to this, it also mentioned that 223,900 cases of Clostridoides difficile occurred in 2017, of which 12800 people died. The report did not include viruses or parasites
VISION
Being proactive
Supporting optimal animal and human health
Exploring ways to reduce overall use of antimicrobials
Using the drugs that prevent and treat disease by killing microscopic organisms in a responsible way
GOAL
to prevent the generation and spread of antimicrobial resistance (AMR). Doing so will preserve the effectiveness of these drugs in animals and humans for years to come.
being to preserve human and animal health and the effectiveness of antimicrobial medications.
to implement a multidisciplinary approach in assembling a stewardship team to include an infectious disease physician, a clinical pharmacist with infectious diseases training, infection preventionist, and a close collaboration with the staff in the clinical microbiology laboratory
to prevent antimicrobial overuse, misuse and abuse.
to minimize the developme
Telehealth Psychology Building Trust with Clients.pptxThe Harvest Clinic
Telehealth psychology is a digital approach that offers psychological services and mental health care to clients remotely, using technologies like video conferencing, phone calls, text messaging, and mobile apps for communication.
CHAPTER 1 SEMESTER V - ROLE OF PEADIATRIC NURSE.pdfSachin Sharma
Pediatric nurses play a vital role in the health and well-being of children. Their responsibilities are wide-ranging, and their objectives can be categorized into several key areas:
1. Direct Patient Care:
Objective: Provide comprehensive and compassionate care to infants, children, and adolescents in various healthcare settings (hospitals, clinics, etc.).
This includes tasks like:
Monitoring vital signs and physical condition.
Administering medications and treatments.
Performing procedures as directed by doctors.
Assisting with daily living activities (bathing, feeding).
Providing emotional support and pain management.
2. Health Promotion and Education:
Objective: Promote healthy behaviors and educate children, families, and communities about preventive healthcare.
This includes tasks like:
Administering vaccinations.
Providing education on nutrition, hygiene, and development.
Offering breastfeeding and childbirth support.
Counseling families on safety and injury prevention.
3. Collaboration and Advocacy:
Objective: Collaborate effectively with doctors, social workers, therapists, and other healthcare professionals to ensure coordinated care for children.
Objective: Advocate for the rights and best interests of their patients, especially when children cannot speak for themselves.
This includes tasks like:
Communicating effectively with healthcare teams.
Identifying and addressing potential risks to child welfare.
Educating families about their child's condition and treatment options.
4. Professional Development and Research:
Objective: Stay up-to-date on the latest advancements in pediatric healthcare through continuing education and research.
Objective: Contribute to improving the quality of care for children by participating in research initiatives.
This includes tasks like:
Attending workshops and conferences on pediatric nursing.
Participating in clinical trials related to child health.
Implementing evidence-based practices into their daily routines.
By fulfilling these objectives, pediatric nurses play a crucial role in ensuring the optimal health and well-being of children throughout all stages of their development.
Welcome to Secret Tantric, London’s finest VIP Massage agency. Since we first opened our doors, we have provided the ultimate erotic massage experience to innumerable clients, each one searching for the very best sensual massage in London. We come by this reputation honestly with a dynamic team of the city’s most beautiful masseuses.
CRISPR-Cas9, a revolutionary gene-editing tool, holds immense potential to reshape medicine, agriculture, and our understanding of life. But like any powerful tool, it comes with ethical considerations.
Unveiling CRISPR: This naturally occurring bacterial defense system (crRNA & Cas9 protein) fights viruses. Scientists repurposed it for precise gene editing (correction, deletion, insertion) by targeting specific DNA sequences.
The Promise: CRISPR offers exciting possibilities:
Gene Therapy: Correcting genetic diseases like cystic fibrosis.
Agriculture: Engineering crops resistant to pests and harsh environments.
Research: Studying gene function to unlock new knowledge.
The Peril: Ethical concerns demand attention:
Off-target Effects: Unintended DNA edits can have unforeseen consequences.
Eugenics: Misusing CRISPR for designer babies raises social and ethical questions.
Equity: High costs could limit access to this potentially life-saving technology.
The Path Forward: Responsible development is crucial:
International Collaboration: Clear guidelines are needed for research and human trials.
Public Education: Open discussions ensure informed decisions about CRISPR.
Prioritize Safety and Ethics: Safety and ethical principles must be paramount.
CRISPR offers a powerful tool for a better future, but responsible development and addressing ethical concerns are essential. By prioritizing safety, fostering open dialogue, and ensuring equitable access, we can harness CRISPR's power for the benefit of all. (2998 characters)
Leading the Way in Nephrology: Dr. David Greene's Work with Stem Cells for Ki...Dr. David Greene Arizona
As we watch Dr. Greene's continued efforts and research in Arizona, it's clear that stem cell therapy holds a promising key to unlocking new doors in the treatment of kidney disease. With each study and trial, we step closer to a world where kidney disease is no longer a life sentence but a treatable condition, thanks to pioneers like Dr. David Greene.
The dimensions of healthcare quality refer to various attributes or aspects that define the standard of healthcare services. These dimensions are used to evaluate, measure, and improve the quality of care provided to patients. A comprehensive understanding of these dimensions ensures that healthcare systems can address various aspects of patient care effectively and holistically. Dimensions of Healthcare Quality and Performance of care include the following; Appropriateness, Availability, Competence, Continuity, Effectiveness, Efficiency, Efficacy, Prevention, Respect and Care, Safety as well as Timeliness.
R3 Stem Cells and Kidney Repair A New Horizon in Nephrology.pptxR3 Stem Cell
R3 Stem Cells and Kidney Repair: A New Horizon in Nephrology" explores groundbreaking advancements in the use of R3 stem cells for kidney disease treatment. This insightful piece delves into the potential of these cells to regenerate damaged kidney tissue, offering new hope for patients and reshaping the future of nephrology.
A Framework for Healthcare and Public Health Collaboration: The Population Health Driver Diagram
1. A Framework for Healthcare and
Public Health Collaboration:
The Population Health Driver Diagram
May 23, 2016
Ron Bialek, MPP
Jack Moran, MBA, PhD
Public Health Foundation
www.phf.org
2. …PHF Mission:
We improve the public’s
health by strengthening the
quality and performance of
public health practice
www.phf.org
Experts in Quality Improvement,
Performance Management, and
Workforce Development
3. Session Learning Objectives
Describe a framework being used to build collaborative
healthcare and public health partnerships to impact a
health issue at the community level.
Describe successes that have been achieved using the
Population Health Driver Diagram framework.
Learn how to use three quality improvement tools - Force
Field Diagram, Process Decision Program Chart, and
Tree Diagram to help facilitate and build collaborative
partnerships.
Learn how to build and use a Population Health Driver
Diagram to map out and align collaborative healthcare
and public health interventions.
4. Today We Will Discuss
How to develop a successful framework for healthcare
and public health to work in partnership, with defined roles
and responsibilities, and to impact the health of a
community.
This framework has been successfully demonstrated to
address health issues such as the overuse of antibiotics,
vector control, and diabetes risk reduction.
We will explore how this framework can be used to
address the overuse and abuse of opioids (prescription
opioid pain killers and heroin).
5. Exercise 1
What are the driving and restraining forces to developing
successful partnerships/collaboration for healthcare and
public health to impact the health of a community?
6. Driving Forces Restraining Forces
Current State:
Healthcare and Public Health
Limited Collaboration
Force Field Diagram
FutureState:
Increased
Collaboration
7. Exercise 1
What are the driving and restraining forces to developing
successful partnerships/collaboration for healthcare and
public health to impact the health of a community?
10. What is a Population Health Driver Diagram?
A population health driver diagram is used to identify primary and
secondary drivers of a community health improvement objective
Serves as a framework for determining and aligning actions that can be
taken across multiple disciplines for achieving the objective
Relies on healthcare and public health to work collaboratively rather than
competitively
Grounded in the belief that healthcare and public health are more effective
when they combine their efforts and collaborate to address a health issue
than when they work separately
Population health driver diagrams can be used to tackle challenges at
the crossroads of various sectors and stakeholders
Helps reduce the “silo effect”
11. What is a Population Health Driver Diagram?
A tool to show a potential change process across
many sectors of a community
Shows the relationship between the AIM, goals to be
achieved, the primary drivers that contribute directly to
achieving desired change, and the secondary drivers
that are necessary to achieve the primary drivers
A guide for the community health improvement team
to the appropriate actions to take to achieve their AIM
Helps the team to have a shared view of the theory of
change in a system
12. What is a Population Health Driver Diagram?
A population health driver diagram represents the team
members’ thinking on theories of “cause and effect” in
the system – what changes will likely cause the desired
effects.
It sets the stage for defining the “how” elements of a
project – the specific changes or interventions that will
lead to the optimum desired outcome.
It helps in defining which aspects of the system should
be measured and monitored, to see if the
changes/interventions are effective, and if the underlying
causal theories are correct.
13. Components of a Population Health Driver Diagram
AIM of the Improvement Project
Goals – Improvement Outcomes
Primary Drivers
Secondary Drivers
20. 16 Step Process to Develop and Implement
a Population Health Driver Diagram
21. Process to Develop and Implement a
Population Health Driver Diagram
“Start Small, Think Big, and Scale Fast”
Come up with the right:
metrics to be used
baseline
improvement goals
timeline
Then think forward about the mid- to long-term of what you want to
fundamentally change and where you want to get to
Once you’ve got clear objectives, strategy-led initiatives can develop and
progress quickly.
22.
23. Process to Develop and Implement
a Population Health Driver Diagram
1. Pre-Work
2. Define the AIM of the community health issue
3. Identify a series of guiding principles for the initiative (optional)
4. Development of an Inventory of current activities – What is in my
backyard
5. Understanding the cost of the population health issue
6. Identify the goals of the AIM
7. Identify Primary and Secondary Drivers
8. Appoint Primary Driver team leads and team members
9. Develop partner contracts and commitments (optional)
10. Refine each Primary and Secondary Driver using an
Agree/Add/Change Matrix and Group Round Robin Input Process
24. Process to Develop and Implement
a Population Health Driver Diagram
11. Develop Action Areas of Secondary Drivers
12. Analyze Action Areas (AA) for overlap to other secondary drivers using
a matrix diagram
13. Develop Action Area Groupings to Implement
14. Measurement
15. Trial Implementation
16. Finalize the Change Package
25. Exercise 2 – What Could Go Wrong in
Healthcare and Public Health Collaborations?
Use a Process Decision Program Chart
Drive to the
Pharmacy
What Could Go Wrong?
Flat Tire
No Spare
Spare Flat
Out of
Gas
Accident
Likelihood
L
H
M
L
Countermeasures
26. Exercise 3: Driver Diagram Overview
Driver diagrams can be used to plan improvement
project activities. They provide a way of systematically
laying out aspects of an improvement project so they
can be discussed and agreed on.
A driver diagram organizes information on proposed
activities so the relationships between the AIM of the
improvement project and the changes to be tested and
implemented are made clear.
A driver diagram has three columns - Outcome, Primary
Drivers, and Secondary Drivers.
27. Population Health Driver Diagram
Overview
Outcome: Aim Statement needs to be clear and
concise.
Primary Drivers: A set of factors or improvement areas
that we believe must be addressed to achieve the
desired outcome.
Secondary Drivers: Specific areas where we plan
changes or interventions. Each secondary driver will
contribute to at least one primary driver.
31. Changes that Result
in Improvement
A P
C D
A P
S C
Very Small
Scale Test
Follow-up
Tests
Wide-Scale Tests of
Change
Implementation of
Change
32.
33. Exercise 4: Driver Diagram Overview
A big part of the equation to the opioid crisis in our
community are the individual community members who
are using opioids.
As public health and population health professionals we
need to understand the whole person and the impact
culture, society, and the environment have on a
person's health journey.
In our community, how do we help individuals to make
changes in their lifestyle to help reduce/eliminate the
opioid crisis we are targeting?
34. Summary
Remember Population Health Driver Diagrams are
“living” documents.
They can and should be modified as you test your
theories of improvement and learn what drivers and
interventions are important for achieving your desired
results.
As a Population Health Driver Diagram evolves, it helps
to capture the learning that the participants have
uncovered about the initiative.
35. Summary
Population health improvement projects can lose
momentum or derail because transformation at the
community levels requires navigating often difficult
economic, social, cultural, and political terrain.
Population Health Driver Diagrams help overcome these
hurdles to progress that can be entrenched or
unpredictable in any project since we can test and retest
theories of improvement.
The Population Health Driver Diagram lets everyone in
the community to have the opportunity to be involved,
have their ideas of change considered. and possibly
tested to determine the impact to the issue
36. Public Health Foundation
Strengthening the Quality and Performance
of Public Health Practice
LEARNING MANAGEMENT NETWORK
The nation’s premier learning network for
professionals and volunteers who protect the
public’s health – over ONE MILLION registered
learners and thousands of training opportunities
www.train.org
LEARNING RESOURCE CENTER
Where public health, health care, and allied
health professionals find high quality training
materials at an affordable price
• Comprehensive selection of publications
• Many consumer-oriented health education
publications
• Stories and webinars on using the Guide to
Community Preventive Services
bookstore.phf.org
www.phf.org/communityguide
www.phf.org
TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE & TRAINING
Performance management, quality improvement,
and workforce development services
• Customized onsite workshops and retreats
• Strategic planning, change facilitation,
accreditation preparation
• Tools, case stories, articles, and papers
www.phf.org/qiservices
www.phf.org/resourcestools
ACADEMIC PRACTICE LINKAGES
Furthering academic/practice collaboration to
assure a well-trained, competent workforce and
strong, evidence-based public health
infrastructure
• Council on Linkages Between Academia and
Public Health Practice
• Core Competencies for Public Health
Professionals
• Academic Health Department Learning
Community
www.phf.org/councilonlinkages
www.phf.org/corecompetencies