9/23/19, 9(25 AMRubric Detail – Blackboard Learn Page 1 of 2https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16603426_1&rubric_id=_1214337_1 Rubric Detail Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric's layout. Superior Criteria Excellent Criteria Satisfactory Criteria Marginal Criteria Unsatisfactory Criteria Not Submitted Element 1: Critical Analysis 21 (30%) Student presents a thorough and detailed critical analysis of each of the six articles (three quantitative and three qualitative) identifying the theoretical/conceptual framework of the study, and describing the major finding(s) and strengths and weaknesses of the study. Several sources and examples support thinking. 19.95 (28.5%) Student presents a thorough and detailed critical analysis of each of the six articles (three quantitative and three qualitative) identifying the theoretical/conceptual framework of the study, and describing the major finding(s) and strengths and weaknesses of the study. There are one or two minor errors. 17.85 (25.5%) Student presents a critical analysis of each of the six articles (three quantitative and three qualitative) with some details identifying the theoretical/conceptual framework of the study, and describing with some details the major finding(s) and strengths and weaknesses of the study. Some sources and examples support thinking. 15.75 (22.5%) Student presents a cursory or incomplete critical analysis of each of the six articles (three quantitative and three qualitative) with vague or missing details identifying the theoretical/conceptual framework of the study, and/or describing with vague or missing details the major finding(s) and strengths and weaknesses of the study. Few sources or examples support thinking. 10.5 (15%) Does not meet minimal standards. 0 Did not submit element. Element 2: Synthesis 21 (30%) Student presents a thorough and detailed synthesis of each of the six articles (three quantitative and three qualitative) describing the placement of the research within theoretical/conceptual framework and explaining the relationship of the study to existing literature. Several sources and examples support thinking. 19.95 (28.5%) Student presents a thorough and detailed synthesis of each of the six articles (three quantitative and three qualitative) describing the placement of the research within theoretical/conceptual framework and explaining the relationship of the study to existing literature. There are one or two minor errors. 17.85 (25.5%) Student presents a synthesis of each of the six articles (three quantitative and three qualitative) with some details describing the placement of the research within theoretical/conceptual framework and explaining with some details the relationship of the study to existing literature. Some sources and examples support thinking. 15.75 (22.5%) Student presents a cursory or incomplete synthesis of each of the six articles (three quantitativ ...

1. 9/23/19, 9(25 AMRubric Detail – Blackboard Learn
Page 1 of 2https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-
BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16603426_1&rubric_i
d=_1214337_1
Rubric Detail
Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric's layout.
Superior Criteria Excellent Criteria Satisfactory Criteria
Marginal Criteria
Unsatisfactory
Criteria
Not
Submitted
Element 1:
Critical
Analysis
21 (30%)
Student presents a
thorough and detailed
critical analysis of
each of the six articles
(three quantitative
and three qualitative)
identifying the
theoretical/conceptual
framework of the
study, and describing

2. the major finding(s)
and strengths and
weaknesses of the
study. Several sources
and examples support
thinking.
19.95 (28.5%)
Student presents a
thorough and detailed
critical analysis of
each of the six articles
(three quantitative
and three qualitative)
identifying the
theoretical/conceptual
framework of the
study, and describing
the major finding(s)
and strengths and
weaknesses of the
study. There are one
or two minor errors.
17.85 (25.5%)
Student presents a
critical analysis of
each of the six articles
(three quantitative
and three qualitative)
with some details
identifying the
theoretical/conceptual
framework of the
study, and describing
with some details the

3. major finding(s) and
strengths and
weaknesses of the
study. Some sources
and examples support
thinking.
15.75 (22.5%)
Student presents a
cursory or incomplete
critical analysis of
each of the six articles
(three quantitative
and three qualitative)
with vague or missing
details identifying the
theoretical/conceptual
framework of the
study, and/or
describing with vague
or missing details the
major finding(s) and
strengths and
weaknesses of the
study. Few sources or
examples support
thinking.
10.5 (15%)
Does not meet
minimal
standards.
0
Did not
submit

4. element.
Element 2:
Synthesis
21 (30%)
Student presents a
thorough and detailed
synthesis of each of
the six articles (three
quantitative and three
qualitative) describing
the placement of the
research within
theoretical/conceptual
framework and
explaining the
relationship of the
study to existing
literature. Several
sources and examples
support thinking.
19.95 (28.5%)
Student presents a
thorough and detailed
synthesis of each of
the six articles (three
quantitative and three
qualitative) describing
the placement of the
research within
theoretical/conceptual
framework and
explaining the
relationship of the

5. study to existing
literature. There are
one or two minor
errors.
17.85 (25.5%)
Student presents a
synthesis of each of
the six articles (three
quantitative and three
qualitative) with some
details describing the
placement of the
research within
theoretical/conceptual
framework and
explaining with some
details the
relationship of the
study to existing
literature. Some
sources and examples
support thinking.
15.75 (22.5%)
Student presents a
cursory or incomplete
synthesis of each of
the six articles (three
quantitative and three
qualitative) with vague
or missing details
describing the
placement of the
research within
theoretical/conceptual

6. framework and/or
does not explain the
relationship of the
study to existing
literature. Few
sources or examples
support thinking.
10.5 (15%)
Does not meet
minimal
standards.
0
Did not
submit
element.
Element 3:
Critical
Thinking
7 (10%)
Writing exhibits
excellent evidence of
thoughtful critical
analysis and thinking;
careful examination is
made of assumptions
and possible biases,
with detailed
supporting rationale.
6.65 (9.5%)
Writing exhibits
excellent evidence of

7. thoughtful critical
analysis and thinking;
careful examination is
made of assumptions
and possible biases,
with detailed
supporting rationale.
5.95 (8.5%)
Writing exhibits some
evidence of
thoughtful critical
analysis and thinking.
A good examination is
made of assumptions
and possible biases,
with some supporting
rationale. Writing
5.25 (7.5%)
Writing exhibits little
evidence of
thoughtful critical
analysis and thinking.
Examination is not
made of assumptions
and possible biases.
Writing does not
synthesize the
3.5 (5%)
Does not meet
minimal
standards.
0

8. Did not
submit
element.
Name: DDBA_8300_Week_3_Assignment_Rubric EXIT
Grid View List View
https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-
BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16603426_1&rubric_i
d=_1214337_1#
https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-
BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16603426_1&rubric_i
d=_1214337_1#
9/23/19, 9(25 AMRubric Detail – Blackboard Learn
Page 2 of 2https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-
BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16603426_1&rubric_i
d=_1214337_1
Writing synthesizes
the classroom
experiences and
content; analyze
patterns or
connections between
theory and practice;
and draws logical
conclusions based on
well-reasoned, superb
arguments.
Writing synthesizes
the classroom

9. experiences and
content; analyze
patterns or
connections between
theory and practice;
and draws logical
conclusions based on
well-reasoned, superb
arguments. There are
one or two minor
errors in explanation.
synthesizes the
classroom
experiences and
content; analyzes
patterns or
connections between
theory and practice;
and draws logical
conclusions based on
well-reasoned
arguments
adequately, but not
superbly.
classroom
experiences and
content; nor analyzes
patterns or
connections between
theory and practice.
Logical conclusions
based on well-
reasoned arguments
are not exhibited.

10. Element 4:
Written
Delivery Style
& Grammar
10.5 (15%)
Student consistently
follows APA writing
style and basic rules
of formal English
grammar and written
essay style. Student
communicates in a
cohesive, logical style.
There are no spelling
or grammar errors.
9.97 (14.25%)
Student consistently
follows APA writing
style and basic rules
of formal English
grammar and written
essay style. Student
communicates in a
cohesive, logical style.
There are one or two
minor errors in
spelling or grammar.
8.93 (12.75%)
Student mostly
follows APA writing
style and basic rules
of formal English

11. grammar and written
essay style. Student
mostly communicates
in a cohesive, logical
style. There are some
errors in spelling or
grammar.
7.88 (11.25%)
Student does not
follow APA writing
style and basic rules
of formal English
grammar and written
essay style and does
not communicate in a
cohesive, logical style.
5.25 (7.5%)
Does not meet
minimal
standards.
0
Did not
submit
element.
Element 5:
Formal and
Appropriate
Documentation
of Evidence,
Attribution of
Ideas (APA
Citations)

12. 10.5 (15%)
Student demonstrates
full adherence to
scholarly reference
requirements and
adheres to APA style
with respect to source
attribution,
references, heading
and subheading logic,
table of contents and
lists of charts, etc.
There are no APA
errors.
9.97 (14.25%)
Student demonstrates
full adherence to
scholarly reference
requirements and
adheres to APA style
with respect to source
attribution,
references, heading
and subheading logic,
table of contents and
lists of charts, etc.
There are one or two
minor errors in APA
style or format.
8.93 (12.75%)
Student mostly
adheres to scholarly
reference

13. requirements and/or
mostly adheres to APA
style with respect to
source attribution,
references, heading
and subheading logic,
table of contents and
lists of charts, etc.
Some errors in APA
format and style are
evident.
7.88 (11.25%)
Student demonstrates
weak or inconsistent
adherence scholarly
reference
requirements and/or
weak or inconsistent
adherence to APA
style with respect to
source attribution,
references, heading
and subheading logic,
table of contents and
lists of charts, etc.
Several errors in APA
format and style are
evident.
5.25 (7.5%)
Does not meet
minimal
standards.
0

14. Did not
submit
element.
Name: DDBA_8300_Week_3_Assignment_Rubric
EXIT