8
Non-GAAPs Measures
Name:
Professor’s Name
Course Name:
Course/Registration No.:
Date:
Introduction/Purpose
Accounting and finance profession requires that the process or recording transaction and preparation of the financial statements be done with some standards that are generally outlined as GAAPs. The standards enables organizations, companies whether private or public and other institutions to be accurate and transparent in their preparation and recording of financial statements. In order to achieve transparency, accuracy and consistency in the predation of financial reports, GAAPs is used as the standard measure. GAAPs stand for generally accepted accounting principles. There is no universal standard that applies to all organizations in different geographical locations in the world. These standards normally differ from one country to the other. Generally accepted accounting principle is the bedrock for understanding of their financial performance of an institution whether public or private owned. GAAPs normally outlines the procedures and the scorecard for the preparation of financial reports and statements therefore when a particular company prepares its financial statements without employing the methodology outlined in GAAPs, then such a company is said to be using a Non-GAAP measure. Non-GAAP measure does not apply the standards stated as the generally accepted accounting principles. Non-GAAPs tries to explain the historical financial performance of a company and the projected and expected future performance of a particular company, the current financial position and the general cash flows.
A number of Non-GAAP measures that will be discussed herein include but not limited to EBITDA (Earnings before Interest and Tax, Depreciation and Amortization), Adjusted Earning, funds from operation (FFO), other cash earning (CE), free cash flows (FCF) and EBIT (Earnings before Interest and Tax). Other Non-GAAP measures include Net Operating Income (NOI), modified funds from operations (MFFO), Broad cash flow (BCF) and ROIC (Return on invested capital). Each of these non-GAAP measures have been explained below.
Earnings before Interest, Tax, Depreciation and Amortization is a type of Non-GAAP measure to determine the general operating performance of a company. Some of the merits of EBITDA include its ability to compare competitive firms in terms of their performance, it indicates a company’s efficiency and effectiveness regarding financial performance, gives the general outlook of business performance. EBITDA does not consider capital investments and other financial variables that may affect the financial position of the company. It only include expenses that are considered necessary in the day’s operation of the company. EBITDA gives an account of cash flows that might have been generated by the ongoing operations in the company. Some of the disadvantages of earnings before interest tax, depreciation and amortization include its f.
A Study of Disclosure of Accounting Policies in BAJAJ Allianz Insurance Compa...employee goverment
The document discusses various ratios used to analyze and compare the financial performance of Bajaj Allianz Life Insurance Company and ICICI Prudential Life Insurance Company over several years. It provides data on ratios such as premium to total income, surplus to total income, total income to investment, revenue to total income, current ratio, leverage ratio, and profitability ratio. The analysis finds that Bajaj Allianz generally has better ratios compared to ICICI Prudential, indicating stronger financial performance and health. However, Bajaj Allianz's net profit ratio declined in 2014, which is a cause for concern.
This document discusses LPL Financial's business opportunity and provides forward-looking statements and notices about non-GAAP financial measures. It highlights that LPL Financial is the leading financial services provider to independent advisors, RIAs, and financial institutions. Key messages are that LPL Financial's differentiated value proposition drives advisor growth, the scale of its advisory and brokerage offerings provides flexibility to manage change, and its financial performance demonstrates business growth and earnings potential. The document contains cautionary language about forward-looking statements and defines non-GAAP financial measures including adjusted earnings and adjusted EBITDA.
This document provides an overview of the steel industry in India. It discusses the size and structure of the Indian steel market, including major players. Some key points:
- India is the 2nd largest producer of crude steel globally, with production of over 10 million tonnes in 2022. The steel industry is divided into integrated producers and secondary producers.
- The market size of the steel industry has grown significantly in the last decade, with production up 75% since 2008. Production in 2022 was over 133 million tonnes of crude steel.
- The government anticipates steel production will exceed 300 million tonnes by 2030-31, with consumption reaching 206 million tonnes. Major investments have been made to
Financial statement analysis is the process of reviewing and evaluating a company's financial statements (such as the balance sheet or profit and loss statement), thereby gaining an understanding of the financial health of the company and enabling more effective decision making. Financial statements record financial data; however, this information must be evaluated through financial statement analysis to become more useful to investors, shareholders, managers and other interested parties.
Analysts frequently make adjustments to company financial statements to reflect a true and fair view, enable comparability between companies, and account for differences in accounting treatments. Key adjustments include reclassifying certain income/expenses as operating or non-operating, adjusting depreciation and revaluation reserves, treating goodwill and intangibles appropriately, and accounting for off-balance sheet items like operating leases. Analysts scrutinize areas like depreciation policies, impairment losses, and internally generated intangible assets to determine if reported numbers require adjustment. The purpose is to arrive at financial metrics that best indicate a company's performance, position, and credit risk.
Jazzit Score is a financial reporting tool that automatically creates a comprehensive 32 page financial report analyzing the health of your clients’ business. Drawing on the trial balance info already entered in CaseWare Working Papers, it includes ratio analysis, trend analysis, comparative industry and custom defined benchmarks with insightful commentary.
Founded in 2000, Jazzit is Canada’s leading supplier of premium CaseWare templates for accountants. Our products include Jazzit Fundamentals, Jazzit Checklists and Jazzit Score, creating a powerful suite of automated solutions for SME practioners. Jazzit Fundamentals, the flagship product, is an integrated suite of over 115 templates and letters that assist public accountants in completing year-end engagements with their corporate clients. With offices in Calgary, Alberta, and Kelowna, B.C., Jazzit’s software serves over 5,000 accounting professionals across Canada.
Jazzit Score is a financial reporting tool that automatically creates a comprehensive 32 page financial report analyzing the health of your clients' business. Drawing on the trial balance info already entered in CaseWare Working Papers, it includes ratio analysis, trend analysis, comparative industry and custom defined benchmarks with insightful commentary.
Founded in 2000, Jazzit is Canada's leading supplier of premium CaseWare templates for accountants. Our products include Jazzit Fundamentals, Jazzit Checklists and Jazzit Score, creating a powerful suite of automated solutions for SME practioners. Jazzit Fundamentals, the flagship product, is an integrated suite of over 100 templates and letters that assist public accountants in completing year-end engagements with their corporate clients. With offices in Calgary, Alberta, and Kelowna, B.C., Jazzit's software serves over 5,000 accounting professionals across Canada.
This document discusses the usefulness and limitations of financial ratio analysis in evaluating a firm's performance. It begins by defining common ratios like liquidity, leverage, profitability, and valuation ratios. While ratios can help analyze statements, judge efficiency, locate weaknesses, and compare performance, the document notes they are limited by factors like inflation, seasonal changes, different industries, and conflicting ratios. However, the document argues ratios still serve an important role by facilitating analysis of financial statements, judging efficiency, locating weaknesses, formulating plans, comparing performance over time, and assessing operating efficiency. Therefore, despite limitations, financial ratio analysis remains an important tool for evaluating a firm's performance.
A Study of Disclosure of Accounting Policies in BAJAJ Allianz Insurance Compa...employee goverment
The document discusses various ratios used to analyze and compare the financial performance of Bajaj Allianz Life Insurance Company and ICICI Prudential Life Insurance Company over several years. It provides data on ratios such as premium to total income, surplus to total income, total income to investment, revenue to total income, current ratio, leverage ratio, and profitability ratio. The analysis finds that Bajaj Allianz generally has better ratios compared to ICICI Prudential, indicating stronger financial performance and health. However, Bajaj Allianz's net profit ratio declined in 2014, which is a cause for concern.
This document discusses LPL Financial's business opportunity and provides forward-looking statements and notices about non-GAAP financial measures. It highlights that LPL Financial is the leading financial services provider to independent advisors, RIAs, and financial institutions. Key messages are that LPL Financial's differentiated value proposition drives advisor growth, the scale of its advisory and brokerage offerings provides flexibility to manage change, and its financial performance demonstrates business growth and earnings potential. The document contains cautionary language about forward-looking statements and defines non-GAAP financial measures including adjusted earnings and adjusted EBITDA.
This document provides an overview of the steel industry in India. It discusses the size and structure of the Indian steel market, including major players. Some key points:
- India is the 2nd largest producer of crude steel globally, with production of over 10 million tonnes in 2022. The steel industry is divided into integrated producers and secondary producers.
- The market size of the steel industry has grown significantly in the last decade, with production up 75% since 2008. Production in 2022 was over 133 million tonnes of crude steel.
- The government anticipates steel production will exceed 300 million tonnes by 2030-31, with consumption reaching 206 million tonnes. Major investments have been made to
Financial statement analysis is the process of reviewing and evaluating a company's financial statements (such as the balance sheet or profit and loss statement), thereby gaining an understanding of the financial health of the company and enabling more effective decision making. Financial statements record financial data; however, this information must be evaluated through financial statement analysis to become more useful to investors, shareholders, managers and other interested parties.
Analysts frequently make adjustments to company financial statements to reflect a true and fair view, enable comparability between companies, and account for differences in accounting treatments. Key adjustments include reclassifying certain income/expenses as operating or non-operating, adjusting depreciation and revaluation reserves, treating goodwill and intangibles appropriately, and accounting for off-balance sheet items like operating leases. Analysts scrutinize areas like depreciation policies, impairment losses, and internally generated intangible assets to determine if reported numbers require adjustment. The purpose is to arrive at financial metrics that best indicate a company's performance, position, and credit risk.
Jazzit Score is a financial reporting tool that automatically creates a comprehensive 32 page financial report analyzing the health of your clients’ business. Drawing on the trial balance info already entered in CaseWare Working Papers, it includes ratio analysis, trend analysis, comparative industry and custom defined benchmarks with insightful commentary.
Founded in 2000, Jazzit is Canada’s leading supplier of premium CaseWare templates for accountants. Our products include Jazzit Fundamentals, Jazzit Checklists and Jazzit Score, creating a powerful suite of automated solutions for SME practioners. Jazzit Fundamentals, the flagship product, is an integrated suite of over 115 templates and letters that assist public accountants in completing year-end engagements with their corporate clients. With offices in Calgary, Alberta, and Kelowna, B.C., Jazzit’s software serves over 5,000 accounting professionals across Canada.
Jazzit Score is a financial reporting tool that automatically creates a comprehensive 32 page financial report analyzing the health of your clients' business. Drawing on the trial balance info already entered in CaseWare Working Papers, it includes ratio analysis, trend analysis, comparative industry and custom defined benchmarks with insightful commentary.
Founded in 2000, Jazzit is Canada's leading supplier of premium CaseWare templates for accountants. Our products include Jazzit Fundamentals, Jazzit Checklists and Jazzit Score, creating a powerful suite of automated solutions for SME practioners. Jazzit Fundamentals, the flagship product, is an integrated suite of over 100 templates and letters that assist public accountants in completing year-end engagements with their corporate clients. With offices in Calgary, Alberta, and Kelowna, B.C., Jazzit's software serves over 5,000 accounting professionals across Canada.
This document discusses the usefulness and limitations of financial ratio analysis in evaluating a firm's performance. It begins by defining common ratios like liquidity, leverage, profitability, and valuation ratios. While ratios can help analyze statements, judge efficiency, locate weaknesses, and compare performance, the document notes they are limited by factors like inflation, seasonal changes, different industries, and conflicting ratios. However, the document argues ratios still serve an important role by facilitating analysis of financial statements, judging efficiency, locating weaknesses, formulating plans, comparing performance over time, and assessing operating efficiency. Therefore, despite limitations, financial ratio analysis remains an important tool for evaluating a firm's performance.
Aimia's Q2 2015 highlights document includes forward-looking statements about financial metrics for 2015 that are based on assumptions and subject to various risks and uncertainties. It also contains non-GAAP financial measures to provide additional metrics to evaluate performance. The document provides definitions and reconciliations for adjusted EBITDA, adjusted net earnings, adjusted net earnings per share, free cash flow, and other non-GAAP measures.
- The document discusses Aimia's Q1 2016 highlights and financial results. It provides forward-looking statements and cautions that actual results may differ materially from expectations.
- Gross billings decreased 3.7% to $573.0 million due to lost contracts, lower reward fulfillment activity, and wind downs, partially offset by new client wins. Adjusted EBITDA was $50.6 million.
- Key highlights included stability in Aeroplan's financial cards business, a new ISS win with Aeon Retail, and progress on Aimia's operating cost reduction initiatives.
This document provides highlights from Aimia's Q1 2017 results, including forward-looking statements about certain financial metrics for 2017. Such statements involve assumptions and are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially. It also contains non-GAAP financial measures and reconciliations to GAAP measures. The document cautions that the assumptions used to make forward-looking statements about 2017 may prove incorrect or inaccurate.
This document discusses various tools for analyzing financial performance, including ratio analysis, working capital analysis, and funds flow statement analysis. It provides details on each tool and how they are used to evaluate a firm's financial position, operating efficiency, and creditworthiness. Specifically, it explains that ratio analysis involves determining and interpreting numerical relationships between financial statement items, funds flow statement analysis highlights changes in financial position over time and how the business financed those changes, and working capital analysis examines a firm's ability to meet current obligations. The document emphasizes that these tools help management evaluate financial strengths and weaknesses and make informed decisions.
This document highlights Aimia's Q2 2016 results and provides forward-looking statements about Aimia's financial metrics and performance in 2016. It cautions that these forward-looking statements are based on assumptions that may prove to be incorrect and are subject to various risks and uncertainties. It also notes that Aimia's actual results could differ materially from the forward-looking statements presented. The document defines various non-GAAP financial measures used by Aimia and refers readers to Aimia's MD&A for reconciliations of these measures to comparable GAAP measures.
The document summarizes a shareholder meeting for tronc, Inc. It highlights improvements in the company's balance sheet, core business, and investments in growth areas. Financial metrics like Adjusted EBITDA, net debt, stock price, and net income were up significantly from the previous year. However, the document also includes disclaimers stating that some terms used are non-GAAP measures and the financial data should not be considered as alternatives to GAAP measures of performance.
- Q3 2015 highlights document from Aimia provides forward-looking statements and cautions that actual results may differ materially from projections.
- It outlines Aimia's non-GAAP financial measures including Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted Net Earnings which are used to evaluate performance but are not comparable to GAAP measures.
- The document reports Q3 2015 consolidated Adjusted EBITDA of $49.1 million, down from $63.9 million in Q3 2014, and updates 2015 guidance for lower Gross Billings and Adjusted EBITDA compared to previous targets.
Financial plan and controll entrepreneurshipfatimanajam4
This file is uploaded to help the students learning finance easier. It will give a general understanding of planning and controlling of financial resources.
This document is a study submitted by K T Phanindra to the Institute of Public Enterprise in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a Post Graduate Diploma in Management. The study examines the impact of liquidity ratios on a company's profitability and performance. It includes an introduction to ratio analysis and its uses and limitations. The study will analyze different types of ratios including debt, liquidity, profitability, cash flow, and market value ratios. It will focus specifically on different debt ratios and how they impact a company's financial performance and profitability. The objectives are to understand the effect of debt ratios on performance and how managers use debt analysis in decision making. Secondary data from company financial statements will be used for the
This presentation was made at the Washington Area Community Investment Fund (Wacif). This presentation goes over how to use financial statements and tools to make decisions.
This document provides highlights from Aimia's Q4 2015 results and includes forward-looking statements about Aimia's financial metrics and performance in 2016. It cautions that Aimia's statements involve assumptions that may prove to be incorrect and do not account for special items or new transactions. It also defines several non-GAAP financial measures used by Aimia to evaluate performance and measure compliance with debt covenants.
What are the four 4 major financial statements.pdfsarikabangimatam
Financial statements summarize a company's business activities, financial performance, financial position, and cash flows through a series of written reports. All reports should be structured to convey relevant data in an easily digestible manner. Specifically, a cliff note on the financial performance of the Business Accountants. These reports typically provide a snapshot of a specific period of time and typically represent activity over a specific month, year, or specific time period. These financial statements are critical to understanding your business and performance.
Ratios and formulas are important analytical tools for evaluating a company's financial statements. Ratio analysis involves calculating relationships between financial data to assess aspects of a company's operations, such as liquidity, profitability, leverage, efficiency and creditworthiness. Common financial ratios are grouped into categories like liquidity ratios, which measure ability to meet current obligations, and profitability ratios, which evaluate expenses and returns. A standard list of ratios does not exist, as analysts choose those most relevant and understandable for the situation.
Original article from the Flevy business blog can be found here:
http://flevy.com/blog/whats-the-impact-of-ratios-in-financial-analysis/
Financial statement analysis can be referred as a process of understanding the risk and profitability of a company by analyzing reported financial info, especially annual and quarterly reports. In other words, financial statement analysis is a study about accounting ratios among various items included in the balance sheet.
Advantages of Financial Statement Analysis
The different advantages of financial statement analysis are listed below:
The most important benefit if financial statement analysis is that it provides an idea to the investors about deciding on investing their funds in a particular company.
Another advantage of financial statement analysis is that regulatory authorities can ensure the company following the required accounting standards.
Financial statement analysis is helpful to the government agencies in analyzing the taxation owed to the firm.
Above all, the company is able to analyze its own performance over a specific time period.
From the above, it is obvious that only way for financial analysis is ratio analysis.
What is Ratio analysis?
What is the role/Importance of ratio analysis in financial analysis?
What are its advantages?
How it helps out in decision making?
How it helps the auditor in assessment of the risk of material misstatement?
These are some questions the answer of each must be known by every professional, business man and by user of financial statement. Some of you may already know about these. The answer of these questions must be part of professional’s life and business man must know to keep check on the management progress.
In simple words, we can say that ratio analysis is “quantitative analysis of information contained in a company’s financial statements.” In fact, it is critical quantitative analysis.
The document provides highlights from Aimia's Q2 2017 results, including forward-looking statements about certain financial metrics for 2017. These statements involve assumptions that may prove to be incorrect. In addition, the statements do not reflect the potential impact of non-recurring items, transactions, or changes that could occur after the date of the document. Actual results could differ materially from the forward-looking statements. The document also contains non-GAAP financial measures and provides definitions and reconciliations to the most comparable GAAP measures.
Branches of Accounting What You Need to Know When Writing an Assignment.pdfMatt Brown
Accounting is a fascinating and complex field, so it can be hard to know where to start when writing an assignment. This article will give a couple of supportive tips to fanning out into new areas of bookkeeping. You will be better able to write about the various accounting fields accurately and thoroughly if you comprehend them. When writing your next assignment, keep these suggestions in mind!
Ratio analysis is a useful tool for comparing the financial performance of companies. It allows analysis of a company's financial health, profitability, and operational efficiency over time and relative to peers. However, ratio analysis has limitations as it only considers quantitative factors and a single ratio provides limited insight. Ratios can also be impacted by changes in accounting policies.
The payout ratio measures the percentage of earnings paid out as dividends. It is calculated as dividends per share divided by earnings per share. A company's dividend policy, industry, growth plans, cash needs, and debt obligations should all be considered when determining its payout ratio rather than following a fixed policy. Maintaining a stable payout can provide investors with certainty but
The document provides an overview of a presentation given by LPL Financial Holdings Inc. It includes statements regarding LPL's future plans and financial performance, as well as required disclosures around forward-looking statements and non-GAAP financial measures. The presentation focuses on LPL's strategy to capture opportunities by growing revenues, creating efficiencies through technology investments, enhancing its risk and compliance culture, and strengthening its financial performance.
This document provides highlights from Aimia's Q3 2017 results, including forward-looking statements about certain financial metrics for 2017. Such statements involve assumptions and are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially. Slides 13-14, 19, 27, 38-39, 41, 43 and 54 contain specific forward-looking statements about 2017 financial metrics, based on general economic assumptions that may prove incorrect. The document also contains non-GAAP financial measures and reconciliations to GAAP measures.
The article focuses on the Return on Equity (ROE)as the benchmark .docxmattinsonjanel
The article focuses on the Return on Equity (ROE)as the benchmark for assessing a business’s financial health.
Do you agree with this approach? (Support your response with 2 - 4 examples of financially healthy companies.).
Additionally, this article presents a spreadsheet analysis for commission-based businesses. What approach would you implement for a manufacturer?
How would it differ for a service organization, such as a CPA firm, staffing firm, or consulting firm?
ommission-based organizations’
values are affected by factors that
are not typical of manufacturing or
other retail business entities. One such
example is an insurance agency, which
exemplifies three factors germane to a
commission-based business. First, an
agency acts as an intermediary by pro-
viding the service of arranging insur-
ance coverage between an insurer and
an insured party. Thus, one of the
agency’s most valuable assets is its
client list. Second, the agency has the
fiduciary responsibility of either collect-
ing or arranging for the payment of pre-
miums by the insured to the insurer.
Third, an agency business typically is
not capital intensive, and owners gener-
ally take most of the profits of the
agency as bonuses or salary.
Our purpose in this article is to show
how a simple spreadsheet model can be
used to demonstrate the impact of dif-
ferent operating and capital manage-
ment strategies on the financial perfor-
mance of a commission-based business
such as an insurance agency. The model
is easy to develop and understand and is
flexible enough to allow for numerous
strategies. Instructors can use the model
to isolate the impact of a single strategy
or measure the impact of a combination
of strategies on performance.
The objective of the manager of a fee-
based business is to coordinate the
resources available in such a way as to
maximize financial performance. Man-
agement must determine growth, operat-
ing expenses, investment opportunities,
cash management opportunities, and the
level of profit retention. All of these fac-
tors affect financial performance and will
be considered in the model.
A typical business has various mea-
sures of financial performance that are
used in evaluating its health. Although
various measures have been developed
for evaluation of the productivity and
profitability of a commission-based
business, in this article we focus on the
rate of return on equity (ROE). Owners
and managers affect the numerator of
ROE by controlling growth, operating
expenses, investment opportunities, and
cash management opportunities. Own-
ers and managers affect the denomina-
tor of ROE by determining the profit
retention rate and, thus, the equity posi-
tion of the business. Successful business
owners should strive to maximize ROE,
which serves as a proxy for maximizing
the value of a business.
The Model
The model is a spreadsheet model that
can be used for any commission-based
business, such as an insurance agency,
travel agency, fo ...
For this assignment, review the articleAbomhara, M., & Koie.docxsleeperharwell
For this assignment, review the article:
Abomhara, M., & Koien, G.M. (2015). Cyber security and the internet of things: Vulnerabilities, threats, intruders, and attacks.
Journal of Cyber Security, 4
, 65-88. Doi: 10.13052/jcsm2245-1439.414
and evaluate it in 3 pages (800 words), in APA format with in-text citation using your own words, by addressing the following:
What did the authors investigate, and in general how did they do so?
Identify the hypothesis or question being tested
Summarize the overall article.
Identify the conclusions of the authors
Indicate whether or not you think the data support their conclusions/hypothesis
Consider alternative explanations for the results
Provide any additional comments pertaining to other approaches to testing their hypothesis (logical follow-up studies to build on, confirm or refute the conclusions)
The relevance or importance of the study
The appropriateness of the experimental design
When you write your evaluation, be brief and concise, this is not meant to be an essay but an objective evaluation that one can read very easily and quickly. Also, you should include a complete reference (title, authors, journal, issue, pages) you turn in your evaluation. This is good practice for your literature review, which you’ll be completing during the dissertation process.
.
For this assignment, provide your perspective about Privacy versus N.docxsleeperharwell
For this assignment, provide your perspective about Privacy versus National Security
. This is a particularly "hot topic" because of recent actions by the federal government taken against Apple. So, please use information from reliable sources to support your perspective.
This assignment should be 1.5 pages in length, using Times New Roman font (size 12), double spaced on a Word documen
.
More Related Content
Similar to 8Non-GAAPs MeasuresNameProfessor’s NameCourse NameCo.docx
Aimia's Q2 2015 highlights document includes forward-looking statements about financial metrics for 2015 that are based on assumptions and subject to various risks and uncertainties. It also contains non-GAAP financial measures to provide additional metrics to evaluate performance. The document provides definitions and reconciliations for adjusted EBITDA, adjusted net earnings, adjusted net earnings per share, free cash flow, and other non-GAAP measures.
- The document discusses Aimia's Q1 2016 highlights and financial results. It provides forward-looking statements and cautions that actual results may differ materially from expectations.
- Gross billings decreased 3.7% to $573.0 million due to lost contracts, lower reward fulfillment activity, and wind downs, partially offset by new client wins. Adjusted EBITDA was $50.6 million.
- Key highlights included stability in Aeroplan's financial cards business, a new ISS win with Aeon Retail, and progress on Aimia's operating cost reduction initiatives.
This document provides highlights from Aimia's Q1 2017 results, including forward-looking statements about certain financial metrics for 2017. Such statements involve assumptions and are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially. It also contains non-GAAP financial measures and reconciliations to GAAP measures. The document cautions that the assumptions used to make forward-looking statements about 2017 may prove incorrect or inaccurate.
This document discusses various tools for analyzing financial performance, including ratio analysis, working capital analysis, and funds flow statement analysis. It provides details on each tool and how they are used to evaluate a firm's financial position, operating efficiency, and creditworthiness. Specifically, it explains that ratio analysis involves determining and interpreting numerical relationships between financial statement items, funds flow statement analysis highlights changes in financial position over time and how the business financed those changes, and working capital analysis examines a firm's ability to meet current obligations. The document emphasizes that these tools help management evaluate financial strengths and weaknesses and make informed decisions.
This document highlights Aimia's Q2 2016 results and provides forward-looking statements about Aimia's financial metrics and performance in 2016. It cautions that these forward-looking statements are based on assumptions that may prove to be incorrect and are subject to various risks and uncertainties. It also notes that Aimia's actual results could differ materially from the forward-looking statements presented. The document defines various non-GAAP financial measures used by Aimia and refers readers to Aimia's MD&A for reconciliations of these measures to comparable GAAP measures.
The document summarizes a shareholder meeting for tronc, Inc. It highlights improvements in the company's balance sheet, core business, and investments in growth areas. Financial metrics like Adjusted EBITDA, net debt, stock price, and net income were up significantly from the previous year. However, the document also includes disclaimers stating that some terms used are non-GAAP measures and the financial data should not be considered as alternatives to GAAP measures of performance.
- Q3 2015 highlights document from Aimia provides forward-looking statements and cautions that actual results may differ materially from projections.
- It outlines Aimia's non-GAAP financial measures including Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted Net Earnings which are used to evaluate performance but are not comparable to GAAP measures.
- The document reports Q3 2015 consolidated Adjusted EBITDA of $49.1 million, down from $63.9 million in Q3 2014, and updates 2015 guidance for lower Gross Billings and Adjusted EBITDA compared to previous targets.
Financial plan and controll entrepreneurshipfatimanajam4
This file is uploaded to help the students learning finance easier. It will give a general understanding of planning and controlling of financial resources.
This document is a study submitted by K T Phanindra to the Institute of Public Enterprise in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a Post Graduate Diploma in Management. The study examines the impact of liquidity ratios on a company's profitability and performance. It includes an introduction to ratio analysis and its uses and limitations. The study will analyze different types of ratios including debt, liquidity, profitability, cash flow, and market value ratios. It will focus specifically on different debt ratios and how they impact a company's financial performance and profitability. The objectives are to understand the effect of debt ratios on performance and how managers use debt analysis in decision making. Secondary data from company financial statements will be used for the
This presentation was made at the Washington Area Community Investment Fund (Wacif). This presentation goes over how to use financial statements and tools to make decisions.
This document provides highlights from Aimia's Q4 2015 results and includes forward-looking statements about Aimia's financial metrics and performance in 2016. It cautions that Aimia's statements involve assumptions that may prove to be incorrect and do not account for special items or new transactions. It also defines several non-GAAP financial measures used by Aimia to evaluate performance and measure compliance with debt covenants.
What are the four 4 major financial statements.pdfsarikabangimatam
Financial statements summarize a company's business activities, financial performance, financial position, and cash flows through a series of written reports. All reports should be structured to convey relevant data in an easily digestible manner. Specifically, a cliff note on the financial performance of the Business Accountants. These reports typically provide a snapshot of a specific period of time and typically represent activity over a specific month, year, or specific time period. These financial statements are critical to understanding your business and performance.
Ratios and formulas are important analytical tools for evaluating a company's financial statements. Ratio analysis involves calculating relationships between financial data to assess aspects of a company's operations, such as liquidity, profitability, leverage, efficiency and creditworthiness. Common financial ratios are grouped into categories like liquidity ratios, which measure ability to meet current obligations, and profitability ratios, which evaluate expenses and returns. A standard list of ratios does not exist, as analysts choose those most relevant and understandable for the situation.
Original article from the Flevy business blog can be found here:
http://flevy.com/blog/whats-the-impact-of-ratios-in-financial-analysis/
Financial statement analysis can be referred as a process of understanding the risk and profitability of a company by analyzing reported financial info, especially annual and quarterly reports. In other words, financial statement analysis is a study about accounting ratios among various items included in the balance sheet.
Advantages of Financial Statement Analysis
The different advantages of financial statement analysis are listed below:
The most important benefit if financial statement analysis is that it provides an idea to the investors about deciding on investing their funds in a particular company.
Another advantage of financial statement analysis is that regulatory authorities can ensure the company following the required accounting standards.
Financial statement analysis is helpful to the government agencies in analyzing the taxation owed to the firm.
Above all, the company is able to analyze its own performance over a specific time period.
From the above, it is obvious that only way for financial analysis is ratio analysis.
What is Ratio analysis?
What is the role/Importance of ratio analysis in financial analysis?
What are its advantages?
How it helps out in decision making?
How it helps the auditor in assessment of the risk of material misstatement?
These are some questions the answer of each must be known by every professional, business man and by user of financial statement. Some of you may already know about these. The answer of these questions must be part of professional’s life and business man must know to keep check on the management progress.
In simple words, we can say that ratio analysis is “quantitative analysis of information contained in a company’s financial statements.” In fact, it is critical quantitative analysis.
The document provides highlights from Aimia's Q2 2017 results, including forward-looking statements about certain financial metrics for 2017. These statements involve assumptions that may prove to be incorrect. In addition, the statements do not reflect the potential impact of non-recurring items, transactions, or changes that could occur after the date of the document. Actual results could differ materially from the forward-looking statements. The document also contains non-GAAP financial measures and provides definitions and reconciliations to the most comparable GAAP measures.
Branches of Accounting What You Need to Know When Writing an Assignment.pdfMatt Brown
Accounting is a fascinating and complex field, so it can be hard to know where to start when writing an assignment. This article will give a couple of supportive tips to fanning out into new areas of bookkeeping. You will be better able to write about the various accounting fields accurately and thoroughly if you comprehend them. When writing your next assignment, keep these suggestions in mind!
Ratio analysis is a useful tool for comparing the financial performance of companies. It allows analysis of a company's financial health, profitability, and operational efficiency over time and relative to peers. However, ratio analysis has limitations as it only considers quantitative factors and a single ratio provides limited insight. Ratios can also be impacted by changes in accounting policies.
The payout ratio measures the percentage of earnings paid out as dividends. It is calculated as dividends per share divided by earnings per share. A company's dividend policy, industry, growth plans, cash needs, and debt obligations should all be considered when determining its payout ratio rather than following a fixed policy. Maintaining a stable payout can provide investors with certainty but
The document provides an overview of a presentation given by LPL Financial Holdings Inc. It includes statements regarding LPL's future plans and financial performance, as well as required disclosures around forward-looking statements and non-GAAP financial measures. The presentation focuses on LPL's strategy to capture opportunities by growing revenues, creating efficiencies through technology investments, enhancing its risk and compliance culture, and strengthening its financial performance.
This document provides highlights from Aimia's Q3 2017 results, including forward-looking statements about certain financial metrics for 2017. Such statements involve assumptions and are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially. Slides 13-14, 19, 27, 38-39, 41, 43 and 54 contain specific forward-looking statements about 2017 financial metrics, based on general economic assumptions that may prove incorrect. The document also contains non-GAAP financial measures and reconciliations to GAAP measures.
The article focuses on the Return on Equity (ROE)as the benchmark .docxmattinsonjanel
The article focuses on the Return on Equity (ROE)as the benchmark for assessing a business’s financial health.
Do you agree with this approach? (Support your response with 2 - 4 examples of financially healthy companies.).
Additionally, this article presents a spreadsheet analysis for commission-based businesses. What approach would you implement for a manufacturer?
How would it differ for a service organization, such as a CPA firm, staffing firm, or consulting firm?
ommission-based organizations’
values are affected by factors that
are not typical of manufacturing or
other retail business entities. One such
example is an insurance agency, which
exemplifies three factors germane to a
commission-based business. First, an
agency acts as an intermediary by pro-
viding the service of arranging insur-
ance coverage between an insurer and
an insured party. Thus, one of the
agency’s most valuable assets is its
client list. Second, the agency has the
fiduciary responsibility of either collect-
ing or arranging for the payment of pre-
miums by the insured to the insurer.
Third, an agency business typically is
not capital intensive, and owners gener-
ally take most of the profits of the
agency as bonuses or salary.
Our purpose in this article is to show
how a simple spreadsheet model can be
used to demonstrate the impact of dif-
ferent operating and capital manage-
ment strategies on the financial perfor-
mance of a commission-based business
such as an insurance agency. The model
is easy to develop and understand and is
flexible enough to allow for numerous
strategies. Instructors can use the model
to isolate the impact of a single strategy
or measure the impact of a combination
of strategies on performance.
The objective of the manager of a fee-
based business is to coordinate the
resources available in such a way as to
maximize financial performance. Man-
agement must determine growth, operat-
ing expenses, investment opportunities,
cash management opportunities, and the
level of profit retention. All of these fac-
tors affect financial performance and will
be considered in the model.
A typical business has various mea-
sures of financial performance that are
used in evaluating its health. Although
various measures have been developed
for evaluation of the productivity and
profitability of a commission-based
business, in this article we focus on the
rate of return on equity (ROE). Owners
and managers affect the numerator of
ROE by controlling growth, operating
expenses, investment opportunities, and
cash management opportunities. Own-
ers and managers affect the denomina-
tor of ROE by determining the profit
retention rate and, thus, the equity posi-
tion of the business. Successful business
owners should strive to maximize ROE,
which serves as a proxy for maximizing
the value of a business.
The Model
The model is a spreadsheet model that
can be used for any commission-based
business, such as an insurance agency,
travel agency, fo ...
Similar to 8Non-GAAPs MeasuresNameProfessor’s NameCourse NameCo.docx (20)
For this assignment, review the articleAbomhara, M., & Koie.docxsleeperharwell
For this assignment, review the article:
Abomhara, M., & Koien, G.M. (2015). Cyber security and the internet of things: Vulnerabilities, threats, intruders, and attacks.
Journal of Cyber Security, 4
, 65-88. Doi: 10.13052/jcsm2245-1439.414
and evaluate it in 3 pages (800 words), in APA format with in-text citation using your own words, by addressing the following:
What did the authors investigate, and in general how did they do so?
Identify the hypothesis or question being tested
Summarize the overall article.
Identify the conclusions of the authors
Indicate whether or not you think the data support their conclusions/hypothesis
Consider alternative explanations for the results
Provide any additional comments pertaining to other approaches to testing their hypothesis (logical follow-up studies to build on, confirm or refute the conclusions)
The relevance or importance of the study
The appropriateness of the experimental design
When you write your evaluation, be brief and concise, this is not meant to be an essay but an objective evaluation that one can read very easily and quickly. Also, you should include a complete reference (title, authors, journal, issue, pages) you turn in your evaluation. This is good practice for your literature review, which you’ll be completing during the dissertation process.
.
For this assignment, provide your perspective about Privacy versus N.docxsleeperharwell
For this assignment, provide your perspective about Privacy versus National Security
. This is a particularly "hot topic" because of recent actions by the federal government taken against Apple. So, please use information from reliable sources to support your perspective.
This assignment should be 1.5 pages in length, using Times New Roman font (size 12), double spaced on a Word documen
.
For this assignment, provide your perspective about Privacy vers.docxsleeperharwell
For this assignment, provide your perspective about Privacy versus National Security
. This is a particularly "hot topic" because of recent actions by the federal government taken against Apple. So, please use information from reliable sources to support your perspective.
This assignment should be 1.5 pages in length, using Times New Roman font (size 12), double spaced on a Word document.
.
For this Assignment, read the case study for Claudia and find two to.docxsleeperharwell
For this Assignment, read the case study for Claudia and find two to three scholarly articles on social issues surrounding immigrant families.
In a 2- to 4-page paper, explain how the literature informs you about Claudia and her family when assessing her situation.
Describe two social issues related to the course-specific case study for Claudia that inform a culturally competent social worker.
Describe culturally competent strategies you might use to assess the needs of children.
Describe the types of data you would collect from Claudia and her family in order to best serve them.
Identify other resources that may offer you further information about Claudia’s case.
Create an eco-map to represent Claudia’s situation. Describe how the ecological perspective of assessment influenced how the social worker interacted with Claudia.
Describe how the social worker in the case used a strengths perspective and multiple tools in her assessment of Claudia. Explain how those factors contributed to the therapeutic relationship with Claudia and her family.
.
For this assignment, please start by doing research regarding the se.docxsleeperharwell
For this assignment, please start by doing research regarding the severity of prejudicial aggression/violence from the past. After you do this, research the severity of prejudicial aggression/violence that has gone on in the past decade. Target the same specific groups that have been the aggressor and victim in both your historical group and your present-day group. For instance, if you choose "black vs. white" in the 1950s, you must use the same group for your present-day group. Once you do this, discuss various ways that it is the same, as well as why it is different between the time periods. What influences have changed? Why is it better now, or worse now than in the past? Please discuss how the advancements in media (news, entertainment, and social media) have had on this issue, along with whatever you come up with outside of media influence. Make sure you back your information up with citations from your sources.
.
For this assignment, please discuss the following questionsWh.docxsleeperharwell
For this assignment, please discuss the following questions?
What was the name of the first computer network?
Who created this network
When did this network got established?
Explain one of the major disadvantages of this network at its initial stage
What is TCP?
Who created TCP?
What is IP?
When did it got implemented
How did the implementation of TCP/IP revolutionize communication technology?
Requirements:
You must write a minimum of two paragraphs, with two different citations, and every paragraph should have at least four complete sentences for each question. Every question should have a subtitle (Bold and Centered). You must also respond to at least two of your classmates’ posts with at least 100 words each before the due date. You need to use the discussion board header provided in the getting started folder. Please proofread your work before posting your assignment.
.
For this assignment, locate a news article about an organization.docxsleeperharwell
For this assignment, locate a news article about an organization who experienced an ethical issue related to communication. In 1,200 to 1,550 words, complete the following:
Discuss the circumstances of the incident, the organization’s decision making process, and the public and media reaction to the organization’s decision.
Presume you have been hired by that organization to help strengthen their communication efforts. Outline at least
four strategies
you would recommend the organization follow in the future to enhance the ethics of their communication.
.
For this assignment, it requires you Identifies the historic conte.docxsleeperharwell
For this assignment, it requires you Identifies the historic context of ideas and cultural traditions outside the U.S., and how they have influenced American culture.
Topic for this paper:
The history of ramen (technically started in China, moved and developed in Japan) now a pop culture cuisine in the U.S.
The paper should be in APA format and two full pages with double-spaced. Also, since you are researching and writing about new information, be sure cite your source (website name, address, date you visited it) at the end of the two pages, so I know where you got your information.
.
For this assignment, create a framework from which an international .docxsleeperharwell
For this assignment, create a framework from which an international human resource management function can address cultural challenges. Within your framework, devise a model that includes due diligence steps, merger steps, and post-merger steps that specifically address cultural acclimation and environmental acclimation, as well as bringing two workforces together.
Supported by a minimum of two academic sources.
.
For this assignment, create a 15-20 slide digital presentation in tw.docxsleeperharwell
For this assignment, create a 15-20 slide digital presentation in two parts to educate your colleagues about meeting the needs of specific ELLs and making connections between school and family.
Part 1
In the first part of your presentation, provide your colleagues with useful information about unique factors that affect language acquisition among LTELs, RAELs, and SIFEs.
This part of the presentation should include:
A description of the characteristics of LTELs, RAELs, and SIFEs
An explanation of the cultural, sociocultural, psychological, or political factors that affect the language acquisition of LTELs, RAELs, and SIFEs
A discussion of factors that affect the language acquisition of refugee, migrant, immigrant and Native American ELLs and how each of these ELLs may relate to LTELs, RAEL, or SIFEs
A discussion of additional factors that affect the language acquisition of grades K-12 LTELs, RAEL, and SIFEs
Part 2
In the second part of the presentation, recommend culturally inclusive practices within curriculum and instruction. Provide useful resources that would empower the family members of ELLs.
This part of the presentation should include:
Examples of curriculum and materials, including technology, that promote a culturally inclusive classroom environment.
Examples of strategies that support culturally inclusive practices.
A brief description of how home and school partnerships facilitate learning.
At least two resources for families of ELLs that would empower them to become partners in their child’s academic achievement.
Presenter’s notes, title, and reference slides that contain 3-5 scholarly resources.
.
For this assignment, you are to complete aclinical case - narrat.docxsleeperharwell
For this assignment, you are to complete a
clinical case - narrated PowerPoint report
that will follow the SOAP note example provided below. The case report will be based on the clinical case scenario list below.
You are to approach this clinical scenario as if it is a real patient in the clinical setting.
Instructions:
Step 1
- Read the assigned clinical scenario and using your clinical reasoning skills, decide on the diagnoses. This step informs your next steps.
Step 2
- Document the given information in the case scenario under the appropriate sections, headings, and subheadings of the SOAP note.
Step 3
- Document all the classic symptoms typically associated with the diagnoses in Step 1. This information may NOT be given in the scenario; you are to obtain this information from your textbooks. Include APA citations.
Example of Steps 1 - 3:
You decided on Angina after reading the clinical case scenario (Step 1)
Review of Symptoms (list of classic symptoms):
CV: sweating, squeezing, pressure, heaviness, tightening, burning across the chest starting behind the breastbone
GI: indigestion, heartburn, nausea, cramping
Pain: pain to the neck, jaw, arms, shoulders, throat, back, and teeth
Resp: shortness of breath
Musculo: weakness
Step 4
– Document the abnormal physical exam findings typically associated with the acute and chronic diagnoses decided on in Step 1. Again, this information may NOT be given. Cull this information from the textbooks. Include APA citations.
Example of Step 4:
You determined the patient has Angina in Step 1
Physical Examination (list of classic exam findings):
CV: RRR, murmur grade 1/4
Resp: diminished breath sounds left lower lobe
Step 5
- Document the diagnoses in the appropriate sections, including the ICD-10 codes, from Step 1. Include three differential diagnoses. Define each diagnosis and support each differential diagnosis with pertinent positives and negatives and what makes these choices plausible. This information may come from your textbooks. Remember to cite using APA.
Step 6
- Develop a treatment plan for the diagnoses.
Only
use National Clinical Guidelines to develop your treatment plans. This information will not come from your textbooks. Use your research skills to locate appropriate guidelines. The treatment plan
must
address the following:
a) Medications (include the dosage in mg/kg, frequency, route, and the number of days)
b) Laboratory tests ordered (include why ordered and what the results of the test may indicate)
c) Diagnostic tests ordered (include why ordered and what the results of the test may indicate)
d) Vaccines administered this visit & vaccine administration forms given,
e) Non-pharmacological treatments
f) Patient/Family education including preventive care
g) Anticipatory guidance for the visit (be sure to include exactly what you discussed during the visit; review Bright Futures website for this section)
h) Follow-up appointment with a.
For this assignment, you are to complete aclinical case - narr.docxsleeperharwell
For this assignment, you are to complete a
clinical case - narrated PowerPoint report
that will follow the SOAP note example provided below. The case report will be based on the clinical case scenario list below.
You are to approach this clinical scenario as if it is a real patient in the clinical setting.
Instructions:
Step 1
- Read the assigned clinical scenario and using your clinical reasoning skills, decide on the diagnoses. This step informs your next steps.
Step 2
- Document the given information in the case scenario under the appropriate sections, headings, and subheadings of the SOAP note.
Step 3
- Document all the classic symptoms typically associated with the diagnoses in Step 1. This information may NOT be given in the scenario; you are to obtain this information from your textbooks. Include APA citations.
Example of Steps 1 - 3:
You decided on Angina after reading the clinical case scenario (Step 1)
Review of Symptoms (list of classic symptoms):
CV: sweating, squeezing, pressure, heaviness, tightening, burning across the chest starting behind the breastbone
GI: indigestion, heartburn, nausea, cramping
Pain: pain to the neck, jaw, arms, shoulders, throat, back, and teeth
Resp: shortness of breath
Musculo: weakness
Step 4
– Document the abnormal physical exam findings typically associated with the acute and chronic diagnoses decided on in Step 1. Again, this information may NOT be given. Cull this information from the textbooks. Include APA citations.
Example of Step 4:
You determined the patient has Angina in Step 1
Physical Examination (list of classic exam findings):
CV: RRR, murmur grade 1/4
Resp: diminished breath sounds left lower lobe
Step 5
- Document the diagnoses in the appropriate sections, including the ICD-10 codes, from Step 1. Include three differential diagnoses. Define each diagnosis and support each differential diagnosis with pertinent positives and negatives and what makes these choices plausible. This information may come from your textbooks. Remember to cite using APA.
Step 6
- Develop a treatment plan for the diagnoses.
Only
use National Clinical Guidelines to develop your treatment plans. This information will not come from your textbooks. Use your research skills to locate appropriate guidelines. The treatment plan
must
address the following:
a) Medications (include the dosage in mg/kg, frequency, route, and the number of days)
b) Laboratory tests ordered (include why ordered and what the results of the test may indicate)
c) Diagnostic tests ordered (include why ordered and what the results of the test may indicate)
d) Vaccines administered this visit & vaccine administration forms given,
e) Non-pharmacological treatments
f) Patient/Family education including preventive care
g) Anticipatory guidance for the visit (be sure to include exactly what you discussed during the visit; review Bright Futures website for this section)
h) Follow-up appointment wit.
For this assignment, you are provided with four video case studies (.docxsleeperharwell
For this assignment, you are provided with four video case studies (linked in the Resources). Review the cases of Julio and Kimi, and choose either Reese or Daneer for the third case. Review these two videos: •The Case of Julio: Julio is a 36-year-old single gay male. He is of Cuban descent. He was born and raised in Florida by his parents with his two sisters. He attended community college but did not follow through with his plan to obtain a four-year degree, because his poor test taking skills created barriers. He currently works for a sales promotion company, where he is tasked with creating ads for local businesses. He enjoys the more social aspects of his job, but tracking the details is challenging and has caused him to lose jobs in the past. He has been dating his partner, Justin, for five years. Justin feels it is time for them to commit and build a future. Justin is frustrated that Julio refuses to plan the wedding and tends to blame Julio’s family. While Julio’s parents hold some traditional religious values, they would welcome Justin into the family but are respectfully waiting for Julio to make his plans known. Justin is as overwhelmed by the details at home as he is at work. •The Case of Kimi: Kimi is a 48-year-old female currently separated from her husband, Robert, of 16 years. They have no children, which was consistent with Kimi’s desire to focus on her career as a sales manager. She told Robert a pregnancy would wreck her efforts to maintain her body. His desire to have a family was a goal he decided he needed to pursue with someone else. He left Kimi six months ago for a much younger woman and filed for divorce. Kimi began having issues with food during high school when she was on the dance team and felt self-conscious wearing the form-fitting uniform. During college, she sought treatment because her roommate became alarmed by her issues around eating. She never told her parents about this and felt it was behind her. Her parents are Danish and value privacy. They always expected Kimi to be independent. Her lack of communication about her private life did not concern them. They are troubled by Robert’s behavior and consider his conspicuous infidelity as a poor reflection upon their family. Kimi has moved in with her parents while she and Robert are selling the house, which has upended the balance in their relationship. For a third case, choose one of these videos: •The Case of Reese: -Reese is a 44-year-old married African American female. Her parents live in another state, and she is their only child. Her father is a retired Marine Lieutenant Colonel who was stationed both in the United States and overseas while Reese was growing up. She entered the Air Force as soon as she graduated high school at age 17 and has achieved the rank of Chief Master Sergeant. She has been married 15 years to John, and they recently discovered she is pregnant. The unexpected pregnancy has been quite disorienting for someone who has planned.
For this assignment, you are going to tell a story, but not just.docxsleeperharwell
For this assignment, you are going to tell a story, but not just any story. It will be a First Nations story, and it will be your version of it.
Choose one of the two stories at the end of this unit, either "Why the Flint-Rock Cannot Fight Back"
You can write of yourself telling one of the stories.
In telling your story, here is what you will need to consider:
Clarity of speech
Intonation
Pacing and pauses
You will also have to work out how to make this telling of the story yours. You might want to read it aloud with point form notes for a prompt or to memorize it. Perhaps you want to rewrite it so that it sounds more like your words. Maybe you will change names and place-names to those you are familiar with. If you are making a video or performing this live, you should practice facial and hand gestures as well as stance and body language. The purpose of all of this is to bring your own meaning to the story.
HERE IS THE STORY
Why the Flint-Rock Cannot Fight Back
Sto-Way’-Na—Flint—was rich and powerful. His lodge was toward the sunrise. It was guarded by Squr-hein— Crane. He was the watcher. He watched from the top of a lone tree. When anybody approached, Crane would call out and warn Flint, and Flint would come out of his lodge and meet the visitor.
There was an open flat in front of the lodge. Flint met all his visitors there. Warriors and hunters came and bought flint for arrow-points and spear-heads. They paid Flint big prices for the privilege of chipping off the hard stone. Some who needed flint for their weapons were poor and could not buy. These poor persons Flint turned away.
Coyote heard about Flint and, as he wanted some arrow-points, he asked his squas-tenk’ to help him. Squas-tenk’ refused.
“Hurry, do what I ask, or I will throw you away and let the rain wash you— wash you cold,” said Coyote, and then the power gave him three rocks that were harder than the flint-rock. It also gave him a little dog that had only one ear. But this ear was sharp, like a knife; it was a knife- ear.
Then to his wife, Mole, Coyote said: “Go and make your underground trails in the flat where Sto-way’-na lives. When you have finished and see me talking with him, show yourself so we can see you.”
Then Coyote set out for Flint’s lodge. As he got near it, he had his power make a fog to cover the land, and thick fog spread over everything. Crane, the watcher, up in the lone tree, could not see Coyote. He did not know that Coyote was around.
Coyote climbed the tree and took Crane from his high perch and broke his neck. Crane had no time to cry out. Then Coyote went on to Flint’s lodge. He was almost there when Flint’s dog, Grizzly Bear, jumped out of the lodge and ran toward him.
Coyote was not scared, and he yelled at Flint: “Stop your grizzly bear dog! Stop him, or my dog will kill him.”
That amused Flint, who was looking through the doorway. He saw that Coyote’s one-eared dog was very small, hardly a mouthful for Grizzly Bear. Fli.
For this assignment, you are asked to prepare a Reflection Paper. Af.docxsleeperharwell
For this assignment, you are asked to prepare a Reflection Paper. After you finish the reading assignment, reflect on the concepts and write about it. What do you understand completely? What did not quite make sense? The purpose of this assignment is to provide you with the opportunity to reflect on the material you finished reading and to expand upon those thoughts
A Reflection Paper is an opportunity for you to express your thoughts about the material by writing about them.
The writing you submit must meet the following requirements:
be at least two pages;
include your thoughts about the main topics
APA Stlye
.
For this assignment, you are asked to prepare a Reflection Paper. .docxsleeperharwell
For this assignment, you are asked to prepare a Reflection Paper. After you finish the reading assignment, reflect on the concepts and write about it. What do you understand completely? What did not quite make sense? The purpose of this assignment is to provide you with the opportunity to reflect on the material you finished reading and to expand upon those thoughts. If you are unclear about a concept, either read it again, or ask your professor. Can you apply the concepts toward your career? How?
This is not a summary. A Reflection Paper is an opportunity for you to express your thoughts about the material by writing about them.
The writing you submit must meet the following requirements:
be at least two pages;
include your thoughts about the main topics; and
include financial performance, quality performance, and personnel performance.
Format the Reflection Paper in your own words using APA style, and include citations and references as needed to avoid instances of plagiarism.
The reading assignment that you are to reflect on is Chapter 11, in the text. My written lecture for this Unit is basically a reflection on Chapter 11. Find an interesting part or two of the chapter and tell me what you got out of it. It's not a hard assignment. If you read my lecture, you will see the part of Chapter 11 that intrigued me the most was the subject of codetermination on page 367. Anything that intrigues you in Chapter 11 is fine with me.
Written Lecture
Does the ringisei decision-making process by consensus, which is used by the Japanese, reach the same conclusion as the top-down methods, which are used by American management? Some might label the Japanese decision-making system as simply procrastination. Others appreciate the method and expect productive outcomes. One major challenge is to build an organizational culture to adopt the practice of ringisei. If only half of an organization uses ringisei, it is likely to cause miscommunication and result in frustration.
The ringisei is based on the theory that the employee is an important part of the overall success of an enterprise. It is common to hear a lot about
empowering the employees
. Is creativity and innovation rewarded, ignored, or punished for the lower level employee in America?
Could the Japanese system of decision making have led to the controversy of what Toyota knew about unintended acceleration problems? This may be the best example of the use of silence in the Japanese culture frustrating Americans as a nation. This is not an explicit accusation of Toyota or of Japanese culture. Rather, it is inserted here to demonstrate potential consequences of management methods, processes, systems, and decision making. Read pages 106-108 of Luthans and Doh (2012) concerning this topic. The cause of the unintended acceleration problem announced by the United States government was due to bad floor mats or driver error. Initially, electronic problems were not mentioned.
The March 2011 Fuku.
For this assignment, you are asked to conduct some Internet research.docxsleeperharwell
This document instructs students to research a malware, virus, or DOS attack by summarizing findings from an internet source in 3-4 paragraphs. The summary should include the name of the malware/virus, date of incident, impact/damage caused, how it was detected, and a reference citation.
For this assignment, you are a professor teaching a graduate-level p.docxsleeperharwell
For this assignment, you are a professor teaching a graduate-level public administration administrative law course at a traditional state university. Your task is to develop a formal presentation providing an overview of administrative law—specifically by comparing and contrasting the key defining aspects of administrative law within the American three-branch federal government structure, explaining how these functions are overseen/regulated, and ultimately, interpreting how they serve the common good of the public-at-large.
Your presentation must include the following with specific examples:
Articulate an understanding of how federal agencies enforce their regulations.
Explain the fundamental role that agency rulemaking plays in regulating society-at-large.
Compare both formal rulemaking and informal rulemaking.
Articulate the similarities and differences between rulemaking and adjudication.
Analyze the various methods of oversight exercised by the judicial, legislative, and executive branches of the federal government over administrative agencies.
Articulate how special interest groups (to include the media) can influence and/or shape public opinion about administrative agencies and place a spotlight on individual policies.
Incorporate appropriate animations, transitions, and graphics as well as speaker notes for each slide. The speaker notes may be comprised of brief paragraphs or bulleted lists and should cite material appropriately. Add audio to each slide using the
Media
section of the
Insert
tab in the top menu bar for each slide.
Support your presentation with at least seven scholarly resources
.
In addition to these specified resources, other appropriate scholarly resources may be included.
Length: 15 slides (with a separate reference slide)
Notes Length: 200-350 words for
each slide
Be sure to include citations for quotations and paraphrases with references in APA format and style where appropriate.
.
For this assignment, we will be visiting the PBS website,Race .docxsleeperharwell
For this assignment, we will be visiting the PBS website,
Race: The Power of Illusion
. Click on the "Learn More" link, and proceed to visit these links:
What is Race? (View All)
Sorting People (Complete both "Begin Sorting" and "Explore Traits")
Race Timeline (View All)
Human Diversity (Complete both the Quiz and "Explore Diversity")
Me, My Race & I (View Slideshow Menu)
Where Race Lives (View All)
Given the
enormous
amount of information presented in this website, discuss what was most interesting and surprising to you in
EAC
H of the links.
Post your 200 word assignment.
Discussion Board Activity:
Now that you have learned that the race is a social concept rather than a biological truth respond to TWO fellow students with your thoughts on prejudice and discrimination pertaining to deviance, social class, and race.
(I'll send you two replies)
Due November 3rd
.
For this assignment, the student starts the project by identifying a.docxsleeperharwell
For this assignment, the student starts the project by identifying a clinical population of interest. Then, the student is to locate (10) nursing research articles from peer-reviewed nursing journals that reflect the clinical population of their interest. From the articles, the student identifies what has been researched and is currently known about their clinical population. The student is to write a summary of each article in a tabular format and submit a single summary table of all articles that provides a review of current knowledge on the selected population ( example and form will be provided ).
.
How to Add Chatter in the odoo 17 ERP ModuleCeline George
In Odoo, the chatter is like a chat tool that helps you work together on records. You can leave notes and track things, making it easier to talk with your team and partners. Inside chatter, all communication history, activity, and changes will be displayed.
বাংলাদেশের অর্থনৈতিক সমীক্ষা ২০২৪ [Bangladesh Economic Review 2024 Bangla.pdf] কম্পিউটার , ট্যাব ও স্মার্ট ফোন ভার্সন সহ সম্পূর্ণ বাংলা ই-বুক বা pdf বই " সুচিপত্র ...বুকমার্ক মেনু 🔖 ও হাইপার লিংক মেনু 📝👆 যুক্ত ..
আমাদের সবার জন্য খুব খুব গুরুত্বপূর্ণ একটি বই ..বিসিএস, ব্যাংক, ইউনিভার্সিটি ভর্তি ও যে কোন প্রতিযোগিতা মূলক পরীক্ষার জন্য এর খুব ইম্পরট্যান্ট একটি বিষয় ...তাছাড়া বাংলাদেশের সাম্প্রতিক যে কোন ডাটা বা তথ্য এই বইতে পাবেন ...
তাই একজন নাগরিক হিসাবে এই তথ্য গুলো আপনার জানা প্রয়োজন ...।
বিসিএস ও ব্যাংক এর লিখিত পরীক্ষা ...+এছাড়া মাধ্যমিক ও উচ্চমাধ্যমিকের স্টুডেন্টদের জন্য অনেক কাজে আসবে ...
This presentation was provided by Steph Pollock of The American Psychological Association’s Journals Program, and Damita Snow, of The American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), for the initial session of NISO's 2024 Training Series "DEIA in the Scholarly Landscape." Session One: 'Setting Expectations: a DEIA Primer,' was held June 6, 2024.
How to Make a Field Mandatory in Odoo 17Celine George
In Odoo, making a field required can be done through both Python code and XML views. When you set the required attribute to True in Python code, it makes the field required across all views where it's used. Conversely, when you set the required attribute in XML views, it makes the field required only in the context of that particular view.
LAND USE LAND COVER AND NDVI OF MIRZAPUR DISTRICT, UPRAHUL
This Dissertation explores the particular circumstances of Mirzapur, a region located in the
core of India. Mirzapur, with its varied terrains and abundant biodiversity, offers an optimal
environment for investigating the changes in vegetation cover dynamics. Our study utilizes
advanced technologies such as GIS (Geographic Information Systems) and Remote sensing to
analyze the transformations that have taken place over the course of a decade.
The complex relationship between human activities and the environment has been the focus
of extensive research and worry. As the global community grapples with swift urbanization,
population expansion, and economic progress, the effects on natural ecosystems are becoming
more evident. A crucial element of this impact is the alteration of vegetation cover, which plays a
significant role in maintaining the ecological equilibrium of our planet.Land serves as the foundation for all human activities and provides the necessary materials for
these activities. As the most crucial natural resource, its utilization by humans results in different
'Land uses,' which are determined by both human activities and the physical characteristics of the
land.
The utilization of land is impacted by human needs and environmental factors. In countries
like India, rapid population growth and the emphasis on extensive resource exploitation can lead
to significant land degradation, adversely affecting the region's land cover.
Therefore, human intervention has significantly influenced land use patterns over many
centuries, evolving its structure over time and space. In the present era, these changes have
accelerated due to factors such as agriculture and urbanization. Information regarding land use and
cover is essential for various planning and management tasks related to the Earth's surface,
providing crucial environmental data for scientific, resource management, policy purposes, and
diverse human activities.
Accurate understanding of land use and cover is imperative for the development planning
of any area. Consequently, a wide range of professionals, including earth system scientists, land
and water managers, and urban planners, are interested in obtaining data on land use and cover
changes, conversion trends, and other related patterns. The spatial dimensions of land use and
cover support policymakers and scientists in making well-informed decisions, as alterations in
these patterns indicate shifts in economic and social conditions. Monitoring such changes with the
help of Advanced technologies like Remote Sensing and Geographic Information Systems is
crucial for coordinated efforts across different administrative levels. Advanced technologies like
Remote Sensing and Geographic Information Systems
9
Changes in vegetation cover refer to variations in the distribution, composition, and overall
structure of plant communities across different temporal and spatial scales. These changes can
occur natural.
हिंदी वर्णमाला पीपीटी, hindi alphabet PPT presentation, hindi varnamala PPT, Hindi Varnamala pdf, हिंदी स्वर, हिंदी व्यंजन, sikhiye hindi varnmala, dr. mulla adam ali, hindi language and literature, hindi alphabet with drawing, hindi alphabet pdf, hindi varnamala for childrens, hindi language, hindi varnamala practice for kids, https://www.drmullaadamali.com
How to Fix the Import Error in the Odoo 17Celine George
An import error occurs when a program fails to import a module or library, disrupting its execution. In languages like Python, this issue arises when the specified module cannot be found or accessed, hindering the program's functionality. Resolving import errors is crucial for maintaining smooth software operation and uninterrupted development processes.
1. 8
Non-GAAPs Measures
Name:
Professor’s Name
Course Name:
Course/Registration No.:
Date:
Introduction/Purpose
Accounting and finance profession requires that the process or
recording transaction and preparation of the financial statements
be done with some standards that are generally outlined as
GAAPs. The standards enables organizations, companies
whether private or public and other institutions to be accurate
and transparent in their preparation and recording of financial
statements. In order to achieve transparency, accuracy and
consistency in the predation of financial reports, GAAPs is used
as the standard measure. GAAPs stand for generally accepted
accounting principles. There is no universal standard that
applies to all organizations in different geographical locations
in the world. These standards normally differ from one country
2. to the other. Generally accepted accounting principle is the
bedrock for understanding of their financial performance of an
institution whether public or private owned. GAAPs normally
outlines the procedures and the scorecard for the preparation of
financial reports and statements therefore when a particular
company prepares its financial statements without employing
the methodology outlined in GAAPs, then such a company is
said to be using a Non-GAAP measure. Non-GAAP measure
does not apply the standards stated as the generally accepted
accounting principles. Non-GAAPs tries to explain the
historical financial performance of a company and the projected
and expected future performance of a particular company, the
current financial position and the general cash flows.
A number of Non-GAAP measures that will be discussed herein
include but not limited to EBITDA (Earnings before Interest
and Tax, Depreciation and Amortization), Adjusted Earning,
funds from operation (FFO), other cash earning (CE), free cash
flows (FCF) and EBIT (Earnings before Interest and Tax). Other
Non-GAAP measures include Net Operating Income (NOI),
modified funds from operations (MFFO), Broad cash flow
(BCF) and ROIC (Return on invested capital). Each of these
non-GAAP measures have been explained below.
Earnings before Interest, Tax, Depreciation and Amortization is
a type of Non-GAAP measure to determine the general
operating performance of a company. Some of the merits of
EBITDA include its ability to compare competitive firms in
terms of their performance, it indicates a company’s efficiency
and effectiveness regarding financial performance, gives the
general outlook of business performance. EBITDA does not
consider capital investments and other financial variables that
may affect the financial position of the company. It only include
expenses that are considered necessary in the day’s operation of
the company. EBITDA gives an account of cash flows that
might have been generated by the ongoing operations in the
company. Some of the disadvantages of earnings before interest
tax, depreciation and amortization include its failure to include
3. capital expenditure in its calculations, it does not account for
any changes in the cost of working capital, it does not give an
insight of tax implications on the firm, it does not account for
the effect of tax and its related computations and how it affects
the health of any business. Besides, it does not explain the
process of converting the most liquid assets into cash and other
forms of cash equivalents and it also fails to account for the
effect of depreciation on the profit projects of a firm.
Adjusted Earnings refers to the earnings that a company makes
in relation to the share prices of the common stocks of the
company. Such earnings are also adjusted depending on the
company’s expenses on research and development in order to
improve its market share. It can be used for evaluating the
performance of a company and it allows easier comparisons to
be made between the competing companies. Adjusted earning
has a disadvantage of being exaggerated to suit the CEOs will in
order to inflate the amounts for compensation.
Funds from Operation are those kinds of funds that are
generates from a real estate investment and normally from the
real estate investment trust. Such funds include net incomes,
depreciation and the amortization value less the amount of gains
made when a real estate property is sold. Funds from operation
calculations indicates the general performance of the company
by determining he changes that do occur in day-to-day
operations of the company. It indicates which areas of financial
operations that needs to be adjusted in order to meet the
required targets and cash flow objectives. It determine the
adequacy of funds that are needed by an organization in order to
effectively carryout its mandate in process of creating goods
and services. The calculation of the funds from operations can
be used in determining the future funds projections of a
particular company and ways of raising such funds and it can
also be used in the budgeting process including making budget
projections for the future operations of a company. A summary
of funds from operations indicates the financial position of the
4. company and its image in comparison to other competing
companies in the same industry. Some of the disadvantages of
funds from operations may be its volume of data calculated in
order to arrive at the final figures might easily be ignored or
overlooked.
Cash Earnings refers to the difference between the cash
revenues from the operations of a company and its operating
expenses. Cash earnings does not take into account the cost of
depreciation. It also refer to the sum total of a trading process
when all the operating expenses have been deducted from the
gross revenue. The cash earnings originate from the profits that
are generated through each share of a company. Cash earnings
gives the true financial reflection of a company in terms of the
amount in holds in the form of cash or other most liquid assets
that can easily be turned into cash. Cash earnings reflect the
market conditions of an economy regarding hoe the shares are
trading in that particular economy from one country to the
other. Cash earning does not show a clearer projection of the
future cash flows into the company.
Free Cash flow is a general term that is used to refer to the
amounts that the company is generating in terms of profits from
it day to day business. It shows how profitable the company
may be in respect to other immediate competitors. It show the
ability of any business to cash that can be used in daily
operations of the business. Free cash flows gives the firm a
higher value its stock compared to the competing companies.
The cash flow statements can be used to determine the future
financial stability of the business. Free cash flows may reduce
risks and uncertainties that may accrue in the process to
conducting a business. It is disadvantageous since a stable cash
flow may only be realized in the long-term operations of the
business.
Earnings before Interest and Tax refers to the profits earned on
the operational and non-operational revenues less interest and
tax. It can be used to find the projections of a company in
comparison with the most viable competitors. One of its
5. disadvantages is that is does not indicate the effect of interest
and taxes on the general operations of the business.
Net operating income refers to the profitability of any business
and is calculated by first finding the net revenue then
subtracting all the operating expenses. It is used to indicate if a
firm has the ability to generate the required income. It can be
used to determine the company’s capitalization rate and the
amount of capital required by a firm for an effective running of
the company. It also identified which investment areas needs to
be seriously funded in order to maintain a particular
profitability rate. Net operating income statement gives a
detailed report that can be used for making viable business
decisions. It has the disadvantage of difficulty in categorizing
the type or kinds of business expenses.
Return on invested capital this an excess amount of what a
company makes over the weighted average cost of capital.
Return on invested capital can be used by managers in making
management decisions regarding the performance of various
levels of performance. It can be used for comparison with others
companies within the industry. It also measures the marketing
and management efficiency in handling the operations of the
company. One of the disadvantages that may accrue as a result
of using return on invested capital is that it uses approximated
values and projections in its arithmetic calculations hence
reducing the confidence of investors. It also does not recognize
that available intangible opportunities affecting the market and
the company. It contains incomplete tools used in the analysis
of data. Other types of non-GAAPs highlighted here are
modified funds from operating operation (MFFO) as well as the
broad cash flow (BCF).
Non-GAAPs measure are not only used by the management and
the company directors but other stakeholders are also interested
in the statements. The stakeholder may include the investors,
employees, lenders, the government, suppliers and the general
public. In an efficient market, all the state holders an equal
access to information relating the market conditions and any
6. other factor that may influence the economic condition. All the
stakeholders need such information in order to make viable
decisions regarding the company’s operations. The government
is interested in such a company because they need the financial
statements in order to determine the amount of tax that the
company is liable to pay to government. The investors are
opportunity seekers and are ready to take risks that can result
into making long-term returns with huge profit hence they need
these published company statements in order to make decisions
whether to invest in the company or not. The employees are
interested in such statement in order to determine whether the
company will continue employing them or not. The suppliers are
interested in knowing whether the company will continue in
operation in order to give them a continuous supply opportunity
in the near future. The public are interested in knowing whether
the company will continue offering them goods and services.
Inefficient market is a kind of market situation where the
available information is only known by a small segment of the
market (Rao, 2007). Information asymmetry is a situation in the
market where the buyers and sellers have varied information
regarding the availability of goods or services or any others
information that is related to the operations of the company and
the market trends. George Akerlof, Michael Spence and Joseph
Stiglitz in 2001 came up with the theory of information
asymmetry. They realized that the information asymmetry is
caused by the uncertainties in the market that are relating to the
quality uncertainties. Dr. Kelly argues that the management of
various do always abuse the use of generally accepted
accounting principles hence lowering its credibility in the
market place. Such abuses leads to bad earnings management
and vice versa (Soon, 2011). Earnings forecasts are majorly
done either on quarterly basis, half yearly basis (semiannually)
or annually. They indicates the financial performances of the
company at some specific points in times or after a given
trading periods. They show how the firms perform in terms of
the profits or the revenue generated over a given trading period.
7. Sometimes the non-generally accepted accounting principles do
not give the full disclosure of the financial position of a
company. It is therefore for firms trading with specific company
to use the slogan and phrase of buyer be aware of the rightful
information in the market. There should be a willing seller and
the willing buyer. Sometimes the directors and the managers of
a company may report the financial statements with a motive of
misleading the public or the government, investors, suppliers
with some hidden agenda of compensating against losses
incurred or in order to avoid paying of hefty taxes to the
government. Lack of full disclosure may also mislead the
supplier who largely depends of the financial statements of the
company in order to determine their net worth and their ability
to pay for the good supplied to them by suppliers. Non-GAAPs
measures are always intended to produce relevant information to
all other relevant stakeholders who have interest in the
company. The information produced is supposed to give
guidance on the decisions made regarding the investment
opportunities. Quality reporting has a positive relationship with
non-GAAPs measure. Quality reporting attracts the users of the
financial statements hence making the necessary judgements
and decisions. Regulations and governance controls the
operations of various types of companies by ensuring that they
remain within the bounds of the business they registered for and
that they are adhering to the current laws and policies.
Conclusion
The study by Dr. Kelly Wee Kheng Soon show a strong
relationship between non-GAAPs measures and the various
study variables. George Akerlof, Michael Spence and Joseph
Stiglitz arguments on non-GAAPs measures also indicates the
different methods of measurements and their correlation to the
study variable. It is therefore recommended that a further
research be carried on the effect of non-GAAPs on the foreign
exchange.References
Rao, A. (2007). A Theory of Market Efficiency. A Theory of
Market Efficiency, 1-36.
8. Soon, D. K. (2011, March 2). Earning Management: Is it Good
or Bad? Retrieved from SSRN:
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1775400
NATIONAL CENTER FOR CASE STUDY TEACHING IN
SCIENCE
NATIONAL CENTER FOR CASE STUDY TEACHING IN
SCIENCE
Everyone loved Yvette. Her smile and laugh were infectious,
her eyes sparkled, and she could turn the mundane into an
adventure. She made the world around her more vivid. In
addition to her adventurous spirit, she was extraordinarily
bright, kind, and caring. She particularly cared for those who
were so often forgotten or treated poorly by society. After
earning her degree in sociology, she worked in an inner-city
soup kitchen for a time and later worked as an event coordinator
for people with disabilities.
It was the holiday season and Yvette was glad that she had some
time off from work. She had been feeling tired and a bit
nauseous for a couple of weeks. On New Year’s Eve, the
normally vivacious and fun-loving Yvette decided to skip the
evening festivities with her family and went to bed early. When
she awoke to the New Year, she was exhausted and one of her
hands was numb. When the numbness did not subside, she
thought it might be due to a pinched nerve and decided to see
her chiropractor later that week.
At the chiropractor’s office, things did not go as planned. He
took one look into her eyes and observed that her pupils were
not properly dilated and recommended that she seek medical
attention as soon as possible. At the hospital, it was determined
that she had a serious neurological anomaly and she was
immediately admitted for testing. A routine pregnancy test
indicated that she was pregnant. Pregnancy could not account
for the neurological anomalies, but it put a temporary halt on
9. the scheduled body scans to avoid risk to the fetus. Yvette was
shocked about the positive pregnancy test. She had been
vigilant in taking precautions; she was in her mid-thirties, had
two young girls, and the previous summer had difficulties with
a molar pregnancy. A molar pregnancy is a rare event that
results from the abnormal fertilization of an ovum, resulting in
the growth of a placenta, but not a fetus. After an ultrasound
was performed to assess fetal development, the doctors were
more shocked than Yvette. She was not pregnant.
by
Tonya Laakko Train
Department of Biology, Elon University, Elon, NC
NATIONAL CENTER FOR CASE STUDY TEACHING IN
SCIENCE
Part I
–
The Mystery
Yvette’s Brave Battle (Based on a True Story)
Part II – The Disease
After determining that there was no evidence of pregnancy,
Yvette underwent a whole body magnetic resonance imaging
(MRI) scan. Multiple tumors were identified in her lungs and
liver and one tumor was identified in her brain; the brain tumor
was the cause of her abnormal neurological function. Th e fact
that Yvette had multiple tumors in various locations indicated
that she had some form of metastatic cancer.
Th e news was devastating and all of the events seemed surreal
to Yvette and her family. She had not left the hospital in weeks,
the numbness was progressing, and the doctors did not know
what type of cancer they were dealing with. Blood and urine
analysis continued to test positive for pregnancy. One physician
had observed these rare symptoms before and proposed a viable
hypothesis as to the source of the cancer. More blood tests were
ordered and the suspicion was confirmed. Levels of human
chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) were 1000-fold higher than
during a
10. normal pregnancy. hCG is a hormone normally produced by
cells of the placenta; it is also the hormone detected in
standard pregnancy tests.
1.
Part III – The Treatment
An oncologist explained to Yvette and her family that she had
choriocarcinoma—a cancer that is derived from cells of the
placenta and often caused by a prior molar pregnancy. The
delay in diagnosis could be attributed to the rarity of this type
of cancer. In the United States, the rate of choriocarcinoma is
0.22 per 100,000 women aged 15–49 years.[footnoteRef:1] It
was also explained that choriocarcinoma is a very rapidly
proliferating and invasive cancer, yet one of the most
responsive cancers to traditional chemotherapy. If caught early,
almost all women can be cured. The success rate drops if
metastases are located in the brain, if the patient has very high
hCG levels, and if the onset was 4 months or more before
diagnosis. Yvette had all of the indicators for a poorer
prognosis but, even in those cases, up to 70% of patients enter
remission.[footnoteRef:2] [1: Altieri, A., Franceschi, S.,
Ferlay, J., Smith, J., La Vecchia, C. 2003. Epidemiology and
aetiology of gestational trophoblastic diseases. Lancet
Oncology 4(11): 670–678.] [2: PubMed Health.
Choriocarcinoma. Last reviewed 05/31/2012. U.S. National
Library of Medicine. Available at: http://www.
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmedhealth/PMH0002465/.]
It was now late January; nearly a month after being admitted to
the hospital. Yvette learned that she would be starting an
aggressive chemotherapeutic regimen. She would be
administered actinomycin, which inhibits DNA transcription;
methotrexate, which inhibits the metabolism of folic acid; and
etoposide, which causes DNA strand breaks. These treatments
would continue once per week for a minimum of three months
or for three treatments after indication of a disease-free state.
Yvette had heard the horror stories of chemotherapy side-effects
11. such as hair loss, increased risk of infection and nausea and
vomiting. While she was scared, she was optimistic and looking
forward to beating this disease.Part IV – The Battle
Chemotherapy was incredibly difficult. Yvette was constantly
sick, lost her hair, and experienced some memory loss. The
memory loss was particularly frightening, but after 5 long
months of treatment, there was no detectible hCG in her blood,
the chemotherapy ended, and her body and memory began to
return to normal. She was thrilled and optimistically looked
forward to regaining her strength, playing with her daughters,
and getting back to work. She was scheduled to be monitored on
a regular basis.
Two months after the end of chemotherapy treatment, she was
notified that the cancer had returned. An MRI showed that the
brain tumor was still detectable and lesions remained in her
lungs. It was decided that she would
need to undergo radiation therapy (causes DNA breaks) on the
brain tumor in addition to resuming another chemotherapeutic
regimen. She had radiation treatment in August and continued
chemotherapy through November. Again, her hCG levels were
reduced to zero and the regimen was concluded; just in time for
the holidays!
On the day before Christmas, she got a call from her doctor. Her
hCG levels had risen—the cancer was back. She began a third
round of chemotherapy shortly after the holidays. The regimen
was adjusted to include chemotherapeutics not previously
administered. Treatment lasted for just over three months; she
hoped to be able to enjoy the summer.
Ultimately, the cancer returned and new combinations of
chemotherapeutics were administered again and again, but the
cancer cells became less responsive to treatment. In over three
years of fighting cancer, Yvette underwent several rounds of
chemotherapy, multiple rounds of radiation therapy, a
hysterectomy, and multiple lung surgeries. Even through the
misery of treatments, she maintained her positive attitude,
contagious smile, and enjoyed precious time with her friends
12. and family. Ultimately, her body lost the brave battle, but her
memory is very much alive in the many people who knew and
loved her.
See questions below!
Discussion Questions…respond by creating a new thread.
1. Radiation and some chemotherapeutics cause cells to die by
damaging the DNA. Why might one be used instead of the other
in treating different tumors, and why do you think that radiation
treatment was used on the brain tumor in this case?
2. Suggest reasons why radiation was not included in the initial
round of treatment.
3. Why, ultimately, did the cancer cells no longer respond to
chemotherapeutics (describe what might be happening to the
cells over time)?
•
Case copyright held by the National Center for Case Study
Teaching in Science, University at Buff alo, State University of
New York. Originally published November 4, 2013. Please see
our usage guidelines, which outline our policy concerning
permissible reproduction of this work.
“Yvette’s Brave Battle” by Tonya Laakko Train Page 1
“Yvette’s Brave Battle” by Tonya Laakko Train Page 1
“Yvette’s Brave Battle” by Tonya Laakko Train Page 3
OCTOBER 2015 / THE CPA JOURNAL48
What is a non-GAAP performance financial measure?Regulation
G defines it as a number representingcompany’s historical or
future financial performance,
financial position, or cash flows that excludes amounts other-
wise included in—or includes amounts otherwise excluded
from—the most directly comparable U.S. GAAP measure.
13. Generally, when a non-GAAP financial measure is pub-
licly disclosed, it must be accompanied by both the most direct-
ly comparable GAAP measure and a reconciliation between
the two amounts. In addition, when presented in an SEC fil-
ing, Item 10(e) of Regulation S-K requires that this disclo-
sure include a description of the reasons that management
believes the non-GAAP measure is useful to investors and, if
applicable, an explanation of the purpose for which manage-
ment uses the non-GAAP measure. (Item 10[e] does not pro-
hibit presentation of a non-GAAP measure that is not used in
managing the business.)
As it applies to a non-GAAP performance measure (i.e., an
alternative to GAAP earnings), Item 10(e) expressly prohibits
eliminating or smoothing items identified as “non-recurring,”
“infrequent,” or “unusual” when there has been a similar charge
or credit within the prior two years or the nature of the charge
or credit indicates that it is likely to occur again within the
ensu-
ing two years. While it is inappropriate to state that a charge or
credit is nonrecurring, infrequent, or unusual because it does
not
meet the two-year threshold, the fact that a charge or credit can-
not be so described does not, of itself, mean that an adjustment
to eliminate it may not be made; in other words, a company
may make any adjustment it believes appropriate, subject to
Regulation G and other Item 10(e) requirements.
THE PROLIFERATION OF NON-GAAP PERFORMANCE
MEASURES
Non-GAAP performance measures have been around since
the 1960s, when they were referred to as “pro forma earnings”
and included mainly in earnings announcements. When the
SEC issued Regulation G and Item 10(e) in January 2003, to
implement section 401(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, it
replaced the term “pro forma financial information” with the
14. more focused term "non-GAAP financial measure.” Such mea-
sures have since become a prominent part of the performance
narratives of more and more U.S. and foreign companies.
The companies that present non-GAAP performance met-
rics [e.g., earnings before interest and taxes (EBIT), earnings
before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization
( EBITDA), adjusted EBITDA] believe that they provide insight
into a company’s core operations beyond one-size-fits-all
GAAP and, as such, afford investors a view of a company
through management’s eyes. Many companies using
non-GAAP performance metrics believe that, by doing so, they
are furnishing investors with a better understanding of the busi-
ness, resulting in a reduced cost of capital. Indeed, a recent
Price water house Coopers survey revealed that nearly 60% of
IPOs over the past three years included at least one non-GAAP
performance measure, with nearly two-thirds of such measures
focusing on EBITDA or a variation thereof.
The perceived value of non-GAAP performance measures
is by no means one-sided, and there is widespread interest in
adjusted GAAP earnings among providers of both equity and
debt capital as well. In 2001, Standard & Poor’s formalized
the concept of core earnings to arrive at an entity’s profit from
ongoing, underlying activities, and it has since incorporated
core earnings into its ratings process. Moody’s performs a sim-
ilar analysis. Another recent PricewaterhouseCoopers global
survey of investment professionals revealed that investors
do, in fact, value non-GAAP financial measures; they like
being able to see management’s view of what is core to the
company.
GLOBAL FLEXIBILITY
Recognizing the growing use of non-GAAP metrics, vari-
ous securities regulators around the world (including those in
the EU, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand) have issued
15. guidelines or rules covering their presentation. Although their
rules necessarily differ in some respects from the SEC’s rules
(and from one another’s), international regulators have, by and
large, taken the SEC’s lead and chosen to treat such mea-
sures with a light touch to permit companies the flexibility to
present non-GAAP performance measures as they see fit.
In a very real sense, this approach is not unlike the funda-
mental notion underlying U.S. GAAP and International Finan-
cial Reporting Standards (IFRS) regarding segmental report-
ing: Under both sets of standards, an operating segment is
C O L U M N S
s e c i n s i g h t s
Non-GAAP Performance Measures
By Allan B. Afterman
Virtue or Vice?
defined as one whose operating results are regularly
reviewed by the company’s chief operating decision-maker
to assess the performance of the individual segment, and to
make decisions about resources allocated to the segment. Defin-
ing a segment this way is intended to provide financial state-
ment users with management’s perspective.
PROS AND CONS
There is no lack of criticism of non-GAAP performance
metrics. Some critics have labeled them as “income before the
bad stuff,” and a large body of evidence supports the con-
tention that companies present non-GAAP earnings oppor-
tunistically to overturn a GAAP loss, to report positive earn-
ings growth (when growth is negative on a GAAP basis),
16. and to meet or beat the earnings consensus when the GAAP
surprise itself is negative. Substantial evidence also shows,
however, that the quality of non-GAAP earnings has improved
considerably since Regulation G was issued, attributable in
large part to the requirement to reconcile non-GAAP metrics
to the most directly comparable GAAP measure. On the pos-
itive side, there is evidence that, because non-GAAP earn-
ings are likely to exclude transitory items, non-GAAP report-
ed amounts tend to be a better predictor of future earnings and
cash flows.
ADJUSTED EBITDA, A FAVORITE OF FILERS
A recent study of 40 U.S. companies (conducted by the
author) showed that adjusted EBITDA was one of the most
frequent non-GAAP performance measures presented in SEC
filings. In 2010, the SEC staff clarified that non-GAAP mea-
sures calculated differently from pure EBITDA (i.e., that
exclude items other than interest, taxes, depreciation, and amor-
tization) may be presented as performance measures, but
they must be characterized as different from—and their titles
distinguished from—EBITDA; the SEC staff suggested adjust-
ed EBITDA as an umbrella term.
The study revealed that the most frequent items subtracted
from or added to net income to arrive at adjusted EBITDA
(i.e., to reconcile to the most directly comparable GAAP mea-
sure) were as follows:
n Stock compensation
n Asset impairment charges and write-offs
n Merger and acquisition related costs
n Restructuring charges
n Losses on debt extinguishments
n Changes in fair values of assets and liabilities
n Gains or losses on the sales of assets.
Overall, there were more than 30 different types of recon-
17. ciling items, including some as company-specific as changes
to the last-in, first-out (LIFO) reserve, the cost of a non-
recurring audit of internal controls, the effect of the 53rd week
in a 52/53-week fiscal year, litigation costs, and the effects of
volatility in pension expense due to fluctuations in the finan-
cial markets. The sheer number of reconciling items reflects
both the flexibility management has in arriving at its version
of core earnings and the difficulty regulators face in estab-
lishing hard-and-fast rules about the selection of items.
WHAT INVESTORS WANT; HOW COMPANIES RESPOND
A major drawback of non-GAAP performance measures is
that they are not likely to be comparable with those of other
companies, even those in the same sector or industry. Of
course, this same criticism could also be leveled at pure GAAP
earnings, which—because of company-specific facts and cir-
cumstances—often make unadjusted comparisons meaning-
less. Investors understand that the lack of comparability among
non-GAAP performance metrics is the byproduct of manage-
ment’s flexibility. Nevertheless, most investors agree that their
value could be enhanced if they were to be accompanied by
clear explanations of the reconciling items and the rationale
for including or excluding them, and a discussion of the
manner in which the non-GAAP measure is utilized by man-
agement in operating the business.
WHAT’S IN A NAME?
Though regulators have chosen to steer clear of prescribing
the nature of specific reconciling items that may properly be
included or excluded in arriving at a non-GAAP performance
measure, it is my opinion that the reliability and credibility of
any such metric would be strengthened by an appropriate and
uniform name. As a term, adjusted EBITDA is overly gener-
al and insufficiently descriptive of what it is intended to con-
vey. The terms “core earnings” and “underlying profit” (the
18. latter is popular in Australia, New Zealand, and Europe) bet-
ter characterize management’s intentions.
A PROMISING FUTURE
FASB has undertaken a research project aimed at improving
the relevance of information presented in the income statement,
which includes developing a framework for defining operating
activities and distinguishing between recurring and infrequent
items. At least one FASB member, Marc Siegel, who happens
to represent the investor community on the board, has been
quot-
ed as saying that, because they complement each other, the com-
bination of GAAP and non-GAAP metrics represents a power-
ful analytical tool in understanding a company’s underlying
business. Siegel notes that empirical research does not indicate
that the demand for non-GAAP information points to a funda-
mental GAAP recognition and measurement problem; instead,
it points to a need for better organization and presentation of
per-
formance information. This sounds like a plan. q
Allan B. Afterman, PhD, CPA, is the author of numerous
treatises on financial reporting and SEC practice and has con-
sulted with governments on the establishment of national secu-
rities laws and financial reporting standards. He is a former
adjunct professor in the Booth School of Business at the Uni-
versity of Chicago, and was assistant to the national director
of SEC practice at a major public accounting firm.
49OCTOBER 2015 / THE CPA JOURNAL
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further
reproduction prohibited without
permission.
19. Available online at www.sciencedirect.com
ScienceDirect
The International Journal of Accounting 48 (2013) 318–323
Discussion
The Effects of Compensation and Board Quality on
Non-GAAP Disclosures in Europe
Peter Fiechter⁎
University of Zurich, Department of Business Administration,
Plattenstrasse 14, CH-8032 Zürich, Switzerland
1. Introduction
Reported performance measures that do not follow Generally
Accepted Accounting
Principles (GAAP) are labeled as “non-GAAP” figures. Non-
GAAP reporting is subject to
intense debate. On the one hand, extant research shows that
non-GAAP measures convey
relevant information (e.g., Bhattacharya, Black, Christensen, &
Larson, 2003; Brown &
Sivakumar, 2003). On the other hand, firms may
opportunistically use non-GAAP figures for
impression management (e.g., Black & Christensen, 2009;
Bowen, Davis, & Matsumoto, 2005;
Doyle, Lundholm, & Soliman, 2003).
The study of Isidro and Marques (2013–this issue) investigates
21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.intacc.2012.07.009
319Discussion
The findings of the study add to the literature on non-GAAP
reporting and corporate
governance. In particular, the hand-collected data of non-GAAP
disclosure from European
firms' press releases provides opportunities to extend related
literature predominantly
based on U.S. data. Furthermore, as the topic is both timely and
relevant (e.g., concerns
expressed by EFRAG, 2009), the research of Isidro and Marques
(2013–this issue) has the
potential to inform regulators and standard setters on the
important question whether the
reporting of non-GAAP figures should be regulated more
strictly.
My discussion focuses on three issues. First, I discuss the link
between share-based payment
and incentives to report opportunistic non-GAAP figures in
Section 2. In Section 3, I analyze
the role of varying institutional environments in determining
opportunistic non-GAAP
reporting. In Section 4, I comment on the issue on how to
disentangle opportunistic from
informative non-GAAP reporting. Section 5 concludes and
identifies directions for future
research in the area of non-GAAP disclosures.
2. Share-based contracts and opportunistic non-GAAP reporting
Hypothesis H1 predicts a positive association between share-
based compensation of
directors and opportunistic non-GAAP reporting. The
22. mechanism behind this hypothesis is
that the disclosure of a favorable non-GAAP measure motivates
market participants to buy
the stock, in turn increasing the share price, and thus
maximizing managers' wealth. This
hypothesis contains two implicit assumptions: (1) share-based
payment induces short-term
interests of the management, and (2) the market positively
reacts on disclosure of
non-GAAP earnings.
Although extant literature (Aboody & Kasznik, 2000) shows
that CEOs maximize their
own wealth by making opportunistic voluntary disclosures,
recent findings by Black,
Black, Christensen, and Waegelein (2011) point out the
importance of distinguishing
between short-term and long-term incentive plans. They find
that short-term compensation
schemes drive opportunistic non-GAAP reporting, whereas
long-term performance plans
mitigate opportunistic non-GAAP reporting. The distinction
seems to be important because
share-based payment is not something “bad”; rather, it is an
instrument to align incentives
of management and shareholders and to reduce agency conflicts.
The compensation
literature usually finds undesirable outcomes associated with
short-term compensation
plans. Therefore, without distinguishing between short-term and
long-term compensation,
it is difficult to make clear predictions linked to agency theory.
Unfortunately, the data from Institutional Shareholder Services
(ISS) does not distinguish
between short-term and long-term compensation contracts. It
23. would be interesting to see
whether varying compensation schemes have a different
influence on opportunistic
non-GAAP reporting in a non-U.S. setting. I therefore
encourage future research to collect
more detailed data on European firms' compensation plans (e.g.,
value of options granted
or amount of non-restricted shares).
Second, previous literature usually focuses on management,
particularly the CEO,
whereas the ISS data uses compensation of the board of
directors (BOD). As Isidro and
Marques (2013–this issue) point out, the little evidence on how
director compensation
affects reporting decisions indeed provides new research
opportunities. However, the
question arises whether the incentives of the CEO and the BOD
are comparable, and thus
320 Discussion
whether the findings from research based on CEO data can be
translated into a BOD
setting. It would be interesting to further explore any
differences in incentives of CEO
versus BOD compensation and their consequences on
opportunistic non-GAAP reporting.
3. Variation in the institutional environment
When testing corporate governance hypotheses, the use of a
European setting potentially
has an advantage compared to a U.S. setting because non-GAAP
reporting is not strictly
24. regulated. Accordingly, company-specific factors can play a
more important role in
determining firms' reporting practices. Indeed, previous
literature shows that firm-specific
governance can overcome weak country-level regulation
(Durnev & Kim, 2005; Klapper &
Love, 2004).
However, the study of Isidro and Marques (2013–this issue)
does not exploit differences in
the institutional environment across the sample countries,
although these differences are
likely to have an impact on opportunistic non-GAAP reporting
beyond firm-specific
Table 1
Institutional factors and corporate governance across Europe.
Country Institutional factors Corporate governance
characteristics
N Regulatory
quality
Supervisory
power
Index
CGQ
Industry
CGQ
Independent
outsider
Director
25. compensation
Austria 19 1.62 10.50 43.03 40.26 1.00 0.00
Belgium 25 1.46 12.50 25.28 27.00 0.56 0.08
Denmark 22 1.88 10.00 25.45 24.20 1.00 0.09
Finland 31 1.67 9.00 60.02 59.81 0.81 0.52
France 83 1.17 9.00 57.15 56.74 0.36 0.66
Germany 85 1.48 9.00 54.94 54.42 0.82 0.01
Greece 44 0.81 10.00 30.86 29.98 0.11 0.00
Ireland 16 1.88 13.00 82.52 85.08 0.38 0.50
Italy 71 0.87 7.50 47.58 46.38 0.24 0.06
Luxembourg 3 n.a. n.a. 13.97 14.60 1.00 0.00
Netherlands 47 1.76 8.00 47.39 46.59 0.91 0.00
Norway 21 1.38 9.00 25.73 21.77 0.95 0.19
Portugal 14 1.07 14.00 26.03 25.51 0.50 0.00
Spain 54 1.18 11.50 26.56 25.49 0.43 0.28
Sweden 43 1.62 6.00 37.29 38.42 0.77 0.35
Switzerland 58 1.55 14.00 70.68 69.62 0.81 0.59
United Kingdom 530 1.84 9.00 84.13 83.06 0.35 0.61
Total 1166 1.45 10.13 63.67 62.84 0.49 0.41
This table presents country mean statistics for both country-
level institutional factors and firm-level corporate
governance characteristics of European firms as of 31 December
2005. Regulatory_Quality is an index variable
constructed as in Kaufmann et al. (2009) using World Bank
data. Supervisory_Power is an index variable ranging
from 0 to 14 that captures the power of supervisors to demand
information, take legal action against auditors, to
restructure or reorganize troubled banks, and to require banks to
provision for potential losses (Barth et al., 2004). Data
on corporate governance is provided by the Institutional
Shareholder Services (ISS). Index_CGQ is the index-adjusted
corporate governance quotient by ISS comprising 61 variables.
Industry_CGQ is the industry-adjusted corporate
governance quotient by ISS. Independent_Outsider equals 1 if
26. the board is controlled by a majority of independen
outsiders. Director_Compensation equals 1 if directors with
more than one year of service own stock.
t
321Discussion
governance. Recent international accounting research shows
that institutional factors vary
across European countries. Different institutional factors have
two important implications for
this study: (1) they directly affect the accounting quality (e.g.,
Ball, Kothari, & Robin, 2000;
Leuz, Nanda, & Wysocki, 2003), which might be associated
with opportunistic non-GAAP
reporting; and (2) institutional factors shape the country-
specific rules for corporate
governance, thereby changing the average firm-specific
governance score. Next, I illustrate
these arguments with selected descriptive statistics on
institutional factors and country mean
values of corporate governance characteristics.
For 17 European countries, Table 1 reports country-level
institutional factors and firm-level
corporate governance characteristics. First, the descriptive
statistics in Table 1 show that the
institutional environment is indeed not homogenous across
Europe. For example, the regulatory
quality index by Kaufmann, Kraay, and Mastruzzi (2009) for
Italy of 0.87 is substantially lower
than the regulatory quality of 1.84 for the United Kingdom. The
supervisory power index by
Barth, Caprio, and Levine (2004) also varies across countries.
27. Second, the country mean values of firm-specific corporate
governance characteristics
as of 31 December 2005 differ across countries. For example,
the mean value of director
compensation for Austria is 0.00, indicating that an average
BOD of an Austrian company
does not own stock of the respective company. On the contrary,
in the United Kingdom,
the majority of BOD own stock, as documented by the country
mean value of 0.61. These
differences are likely attributable to different country-level
rules on corporate governance.
For example, Switzerland introduced the “Directive Corporate
Governance” for all listed
firms in 2002, and the United Kingdom tightened its rules for
corporate governance
reporting in 2004. These country-level differences are reflected
in higher mean aggregate
corporate governance scores (Index_CGQ) of 70.68 and 84.13
for Switzerland and United
Kingdom, respectively, compared to countries without
mandatory rules on corporate
governance reporting like Austria, which has a mean score of
43.03.
Taken together, these descriptive results document that both the
institutional environment
and the average corporate governance substantially vary across
European countries. As firms
from country i have systematically different corporate
governance scores than firms from
country j, it is difficult to isolate the firm-specific corporate
governance effect from a general
country-level effect on non-GAAP reporting behavior. In
addition, institutional factors
(e.g., regulatory quality) can directly affect non-GAAP
28. reporting. Therefore, I recommend
further exploiting the role of institutional factors on
opportunistic non-GAAP reporting.
One possible research question is whether the mitigating effect
of firm-level corporate
governance on opportunistic reporting is more pronounced in
weak regulatory environments.
4. Opportunistic versus informative reporting
The main part of the paper separately investigates four proxies
that are usually employed in
the literature to measure opportunistic non-GAAP reporting. In
Section 6 of Isidro and
Marques (2013–this issue), they seek to better distinguish
opportunistic and informational
non-GAAP reporting by combining their proxies. However, the
empirical evidence on
share-based compensation is not very strong, particularly
because the sign of the coefficient is
positive irrespective of whether the intention is opportunistic or
informational. As the
distinction between intentions is important, I suggest
emphasizing this issue to allow further
322 Discussion
insights in entities' reporting strategy. For example, a firm
reports a non-GAAP measure
exceeding the GAAP measure in the title of the press release
without providing any
reconciliation. These reporting practices are likely to be driven
by opportunistic reasons, so we
should find even stronger positive (negative) correlations with
compensation structure (board
29. quality).
Related to that argument, Isidro and Marques (2013–this issue)
use consensus beating and
avoid losses as explanatory variables. Both variables equal 1 if
the non-GAAP figure helps to
beat the consensus and avoid reporting a loss, respectively. As
expected, the authors find that
these variables are positively related with the decision to
disclose a non-GAAP earnings figure.
While supporting the use of these variables to control for other
firm incentives for non-GAAP
reporting, I suggest further exploiting the underlying constructs
of the two variables to
disentangle opportunistic and informative non-GAAP reporting.
Again, I suggest combining
these variables with the other dependent variables to increase
the likelihood that the firm's
reporting is driven by opportunistic reasons instead of
information purposes. If a firm
prominently discloses a non-GAAP figure without reconciliation
that exceeds the analyst
consensus forecast, the firm's reporting strategy is most likely
opportunistic. Using such a
combined dependent variable would possibly increase
confidence in the inferences drawn from
the study.
Apart from their analysis in Section 6, I also acknowledge the
attempt of Isidro and
Marques (2013–this issue) to check whether EBIT figures in the
press release differ from the
EBIT in the audited financial statements (see information on
data collection in Section 3).
This procedure is a possible way to rule out the alternative
explanation that the reported
30. non-GAAP figure is simply a key number for internal control
and thus relevant to investors. If
this is the case, the reporting of such a non-GAAP figure is
driven by informational rather
than opportunistic reasons. Therefore, the additional tests of
Isidro and Marques (2013–this
issue) are important steps towards identifying opportunistic
non-GAAP reporting.
5. Conclusion
The study of Isidro and Marques (2013–this issue) finds a
positive relationship
between opportunistic non-GAAP reporting and share-based
payment of the directors.
In addition, the authors find that better board quality can help
mitigating two out of four
non-GAAP disclosure practices, namely the disclosure decision
itself and the emphasis
given to the non-GAAP figure in the press release. Although the
research design
controls for other firm-specific determinants of opportunistic
non-GAAP reporting
(e.g., ownership structure), we should draw conclusions
cautiously, because other not
identified factors may also play a role in determining
opportunistic non-GAAP
reporting. Therefore, a more powerful test would be to examine
whether a change in the
corporate governance structure also leads to changes in the
reporting behavior.
Nevertheless, the study of Isidro and Marques (2013–this issue)
helps to show the link
between corporate governance and opportunistic reporting of
non-GAAP earnings figures. As
31. this research area is of importance to standard setters and
regulators, I encourage future
research to further explore some of the issues raised in this
discussion. In particular, I
encourage an examination of the role that different institutional
environments across countries
play in determining opportunistic non-GAAP reporting.
323Discussion
References
Aboody, D., & Kasznik, R. (2000). CEO stock option awards
and the timing of corporate voluntary disclosures.
Journal of Accounting and Economics, 29, 73–100.
Ball, R., Kothari, S. P., & Robin, A. (2000). The effect of
international institutional factors on properties of
accounting earnings. Journal of Accounting and Economics,
29(1), 1–51.
Barth, J. R., Caprio, G., & Levine, R. (2004). Bank regulation
and supervision: What works best? Journal of
Financial Intermediation, 13(2), 205–248.
Beekes, W., & Brown, P. (2006). Do better-governed Australian
firms make more informative disclosures?
Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 33(3), 422–450.
Bhattacharya, N., Black, E., Christensen, T., & Larson, C.
(2003). Assessing the relative informativeness and
permanence of pro forma earnings and GAAP operating
earnings. Journal of Accounting and Economics,
36(1–3), 285–319.
32. Bhattacharya, N., Black, E., Christensen, T., & Mergenthaler,
R. (2007). Who trades on pro form a earnings
information? The Accounting Review, 82(3), 581–619.
Black, D., Black, E., Christensen, T., & Waegelein, J. (2011).
The effects of executive compensation contracts and
auditor effort on firms' pro forma reporting decisions. Working
paper — Duke University.
Black, D., & Christensen, T. (2009). US managers' use of ‘pro
forma’ adjustments to meet strategic earnings
targets. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 36(3), 297–
326.
Bowen, R., Davis, A., & Matsumoto, D. (2005). Do firms
strategically emphasize performance metrics in their
earnings press releases? The Accounting Review, 80(4), 1011–
1038.
Brown, L. D., & Sivakumar, K. (2003). Comparing the value
relevance of two operating income measures. Review
of Accounting Studies, 8(4), 561–572.
Doyle, J., Lundholm, R., & Soliman, M. (2003). The predictive
value of expenses excluded from pro forma
earnings. Review of Accounting Studies, 8, 145–174.
Durnev, A., & Kim, E. (2005). To steal or not to steal: Firm
attributes, legal environment and valuation. Journal of
Finance, 60(3), 1461–1493.
European Financial Reporting Advisory Group (2009). Pro-
active accounting activities in Europe. Performance
reporting, a European discussion paper. Brussels, Belgium:
EFRAG.
33. Frankel, R., McVay, S., & Soliman, M. (2011). Non-GAAP
earnings and board independence. Review of
Accounting Studies, 16(4), 719–744.
Isidro, H., & Marques, A. (2013). The Effects of Compensation
and Board Quality on Non-GAAP Disclosures in
Europe. The International Journal of Accounting, 48(3), 289–
317 (this issue).
Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., & Mastruzzi, M. (2009). Governance
matters VIII: Aggregate and individual
governance indicators 1996–2008. Policy research working
paper. The World Bank.
Klapper, L., & Love, I. (2004). Corporate governance, investor
protection and performance in emerging markets.
Journal of Corporate Finance, 10, 703–728.
Leuz, C., Nanda, D., & Wysocki, P. (2003). Earnings
management and investor protection: An international
comparison. Journal of Financial Economics, 69(3), 505–527.
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7063(13)00082-4/rf0005
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7063(13)00082-4/rf0005
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7063(13)00082-4/rf0010
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7063(13)00082-4/rf0010
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7063(13)00082-4/rf0015
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7063(13)00082-4/rf0015
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7063(13)00082-4/rf0020
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7063(13)00082-4/rf0020
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7063(13)00082-4/rf0025
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7063(13)00082-4/rf0025
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7063(13)00082-4/rf0025
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7063(13)00082-4/rf0030
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7063(13)00082-4/rf0030
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7063(13)00082-4/rf0035
35. Response to Discussion of: The Effects of
Compensation and Board Quality on Non-GAAP
Disclosures in Europe
Helena Isidroa, Ana Marquesb,⁎
a Instituto Universitário de Lisboa (ISCTE IUL), BRU UNIDE,
Lisboa Portugal
b Nova School of Business and Economics, INOVA,
Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Portugal
1. Introduction
We are grateful to the discussant, Peter Fiechter, for the
insightful remarks about our
paper. The discussant's comments focus on three issues: (1) the
link between share-based
compensation and opportunistic non-GAAP reporting; (2) the
role of varying institutional
environments; and (3) the distinction between opportunistic and
informative non-GAAP
reporting. In this response, we provide clarifications to address
these concerns and suggest
avenues for future research.
2. The link between share-based compensation and opportunistic
non-GAAP reporting
The discussant suggests a more in-depth analysis of the
relationship between compensation
and opportunistic non-GAAP voluntary disclosure. The first
proposed analysis involves the
separation between the short-term and long-term compensation
incentives. We agree that such
an analysis would bring valuable insights to the literature,
37. 3. The role of varying institutional environments
We agree with the discussant's arguments that substantial
variation in the institutional
conditions of the countries where the firms operate may affect
non-GAAP voluntary
disclosure choices. The impact of macro-level conditions on
reporting outcomes has been
widely documented in the international literature (Ball, Kothari,
& Robin, 2000; Ball,
Robin, & Wu, 2003; Burgstahler, Hail, & Leuz, 2006; Leuz,
2010; Leuz, Nanda, &
Wysocki, 2003). We also believe that the influence of
institutional conditions in
non-GAAP reporting is likely to be particularly strong in the
European setting, given the
lack of stringent non-GAAP regulation in Europe (a distinctive
feature of the European
context relative to the U.S.). This is an important issue that
deserves a separate and
thorough investigation. As such, the authors explore the
influence of institutional
conditions on non-GAAP reporting in another study (Isidro &
Marques, 2012). That study
finds that managers are more likely to use non-GAAP reporting
in an opportunistic way (to
meet earnings benchmarks) in countries with efficient
institutional and economic
conditions, which suggests that opportunistic non-GAAP
reporting increases in
institutionally developed environments where there is more
pressure to achieve earnings
targets and less opportunity to manipulate reported earnings.
Related to the above point, a research question not yet
38. addressed is how country-level
institutional forces and firm-level governance mechanisms (the
two factors indicated by the
discussant) jointly influence managers' non-GAAP reporting
strategies, and whether there
is an interaction effect between the two. This is a possible
avenue for future research.
With regard to the variation in countries' corporate governance
levels, we argue that ISS
governance scores are constructed on an internationally
comparable basis. However, we
agree with the discussant's point that the general corporate
governance level of the country
is embedded in the firms' specific governance scores. A possible
way to isolate the firm
specific governance quality is to use a scaled governance score
in which the scale is the
country governance index reported in Table 1 in the discussion.
4. The distinction between opportunistic and informative non-
GAAP reporting
The separation between opportunistic and informative non-
GAAP reporting is a critical
issue affecting all of the non-GAAP literature, as we cannot
directly observe managers'
intentions. In our paper, we have studied the reporting practices
previously identified in the
literature as opportunistic disclosures (e.g., Black &
Christensen, 2009; Bowen, Davis, &
Matsumoto, 2005; Doyle, Lundholm, & Soliman, 2003; Elliott,
2006; Marques, 2010;
Zhang & Zheng, 2011). We have constructed the indicator
variables opportunistic
disclosure and informative disclosure as a combination of those
39. practices following the
326 Reply
suggestion of one of the reviewers. Although we find that both
the estimated coefficients
for compensation are positive and statistically significant (Panel
B, Table 6), it is important
to consider that the effect is statistically higher in the case of
opportunistic disclosure.
Thus, while firms that disclose non-GAAP earnings measures
with informative intentions
do this more frequently when directors' compensation is linked
to firms' market
performance, they still do it less frequently than firms with
opportunistic motivations.
Nevertheless, we agree that with a larger panel of observations,
one could explore specific
combinations of reporting strategies including whether or not
the non-GAAP numbers
meet analysts' expectations about year earnings. Another
possible area for future research
is to identify firms that consistently use aggressive non-GAAP
strategies through time.
Acknowledgments
We thank Peter Fiechter for the helpful comments and
discussion. We acknowledge the
constructive comments from the 2011 International Journal of
Accounting Symposium, the
2011 IAS mid-year meeting, the 2011 EAA annual congress, and
the 2011 AAA annual
meeting participants. We also thank the anonymous reviewers
and the editor of the International
40. Journal of Accounting, Professor A. Rashad Abdel-Khalik, for
their helpful suggestions.
References
Ball, R., Kothari, S., & Robin, A. (2000). The effect of
international institutional factors on properties of
accounting earnings. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 29,
1–51.
Ball, R., Robin, A., & Wu, J. (2003). Incentives versus
standards: Properties of accounting income in four East
Asian countries. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 36,
235–270.
Black, D., Black, E., Christensen, T., & Waegelein, J. (2011).
The effects of executive compensation contracts and
auditor effort on firms' pro forma reporting decisions. Working
paper. Duke University.
Black, D., & Christensen, T. (2009). US managers' use of ‘pro
forma’ adjustments to meet strategic earnings
targets. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 36(3), 297–
326.
Bowen, R., Davis, A., & Matsumoto, D. (2005). Do firms
strategically emphasize performance metrics in their
earnings press releases? The Accounting Review, 80(4), 1011–
1038.
Burgstahler, D., Hail, L., & Leuz, C. (2006). The importance of
reporting incentives: Earnings management in
European private and public firms. The Accounting Review, 81,
983–1017.
Doyle, J., Lundholm, R., & Soliman, M. (2003). The predictive
41. value of expenses excluded from pro forma
earnings. Review of Accounting Studies, 8, 145–174.
Elliott, W. (2006). Are investors influenced by pro forma
emphasis and reconciliations in earnings
announcements? The Accounting Review, 81(1), 113–133.
Isidro, H., & Marques, A. (2012). The role of institutional and
economic forces in the strategic use of non-GAAP
disclosures to beat earnings benchmarks. Working paper
(available at http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?
abstract_id=1940514).
Leuz, C. (2010). Different approaches to corporate reporting
regulation: How jurisdictions differ and why.
Accounting and Business Research, 40, 229–256.
Leuz, C., Nanda, D., & Wysocki, P. (2003). Earnings
management and investor protection: An international
comparison. Journal of Financial Economics, 69, 505–527.
Marques, A. (2010). Disclosure strategies among S&P 500
firms: Evidence on the disclosure of non-GAAP
financial measures and financial statements in earnings press
releases. The British Accounting Review, 42,
119–131.
Zhang, H., & Zheng, L. (2011). The valuation impact of
reconciling pro forma earnings to GAAP earnings.
Journal of Accounting and Economics, 51, 186–202.
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7063(13)00079-4/rf0005
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7063(13)00079-4/rf0005
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7063(13)00079-4/rf0010
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7063(13)00079-4/rf0010
http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0020-7063(13)00079-4/rf0015
43. Course/Registration No.:
Date:
Introduction/Purpose
Accounting and finance profession requires that the process or
recording transaction and preparation of the financial statements
be done with some standards that are generally outlined as
GAAPs. The standards enables organizations, companies
whether private or public and other institutions to be accurate
and transparent in their preparation and recording of financial
statements. In order to achieve transparency, accuracy and
consistency in the predation of financial reports, GAAPs is used
as the standard measure. GAAPs stand for generally accepted
accounting principles. There is no universal standard that
applies to all organizations in different geographical locations
in the world. These standards normally differ from one country
to the other. Generally accepted accounting principle is the
bedrock for understanding of their financial performance of an
institution whether public or private owned. GAAPs normally
outlines the procedures and the scorecard for the preparation of
financial reports and statements therefore when a particular
company prepares its financial statements without employing
the methodology outlined in GAAPs, then such a company is
said to be using a Non-GAAP measure. Non-GAAP measure
44. does not apply the standards stated as the generally accepted
accounting principles. Non-GAAPs tries to explain the
historical financial performance of a company and the projected
and expected future performance of a particular company, the
current financial position and the general cash flows.
A number of Non-GAAP measures that will be discussed herein
include but not limited to EBITDA (Earnings before Interest
and Tax, Depreciation and Amortization), Adjusted Earning,
funds from operation (FFO), other cash earning (CE), free cash
flows (FCF) and EBIT (Earnings before Interest and Tax). Other
Non-GAAP measures include Net Operating Income (NOI),
modified funds from operations (MFFO), Broad cash flow
(BCF) and ROIC (Return on invested capital). Each of these
non-GAAP measures have been explained below.
Earnings before Interest, Tax, Depreciation and Amortization is
a type of Non-GAAP measure to determine the general
operating performance of a company. Some of the merits of
EBITDA include its ability to compare competitive firms in
terms of their performance, it indicates a company’s efficiency
and effectiveness regarding financial performance, gives the
general outlook of business performance. EBITDA does not
consider capital investments and other financial variables that
may affect the financial position of the company. It only include
expenses that are considered necessary in the day’s operation of
the company. EBITDA gives an account of cash flows that
might have been generated by the ongoing operations in the
company. Some of the disadvantages of earnings before interest
tax, depreciation and amortization include its failure to include
capital expenditure in its calculations, it does not account for
any changes in the cost of working capital, it does not give an
insight of tax implications on the firm, it does not account for
the effect of tax and its related computations and how it affects
the health of any business. Besides, it does not explain the
process of converting the most liquid assets into cash and other
forms of cash equivalents and it also fails to account for the
effect of depreciation on the profit projects of a firm.
45. Adjusted Earnings refers to the earnings that a company makes
in relation to the share prices of the common stocks of the
company. Such earnings are also adjusted depending on the
company’s expenses on research and development in order to
improve its market share. It can be used for evaluating the
performance of a company and it allows easier comparisons to
be made between the competing companies. Adjusted earning
has a disadvantage of being exaggerated to suit the CEOs will in
order to inflate the amounts for compensation.
Funds from Operation are those kinds of funds that are
generates from a real estate investment and normally from the
real estate investment trust. Such funds include net incomes,
depreciation and the amortization value less the amount of gains
made when a real estate property is sold. Funds from operation
calculations indicates the general performance of the company
by determining he changes that do occur in day-to-day
operations of the company. It indicates which areas of financial
operations that needs to be adjusted in order to meet the
required targets and cash flow objectives. It determine the
adequacy of funds that are needed by an organization in order to
effectively carryout its mandate in process of creating goods
and services. The calculation of the funds from operations can
be used in determining the future funds projections of a
particular company and ways of raising such funds and it can
also be used in the budgeting process including making budget
projections for the future operations of a company. A summary
of funds from operations indicates the financial position of the
company and its image in comparison to other competing
companies in the same industry. Some of the disadvantages of
funds from operations may be its volume of data calculated in
order to arrive at the final figures might easily be ignored or
overlooked.
Cash Earnings refers to the difference between the cash
revenues from the operations of a company and its operating
expenses. Cash earnings does not take into account the cost of
46. depreciation. It also refer to the sum total of a trading process
when all the operating expenses have been deducted from the
gross revenue. The cash earnings originate from the profits that
are generated through each share of a company. Cash earnings
gives the true financial reflection of a company in terms of the
amount in holds in the form of cash or other most liquid assets
that can easily be turned into cash. Cash earnings reflect the
market conditions of an economy regarding hoe the shares are
trading in that particular economy from one country to the
other. Cash earning does not show a clearer projection of the
future cash flows into the company.
Free Cash flow is a general term that is used to refer to the
amounts that the company is generating in terms of profits from
it day to day business. It shows how profitable the company
may be in respect to other immediate competitors. It show the
ability of any business to cash that can be used in daily
operations of the business. Free cash flows gives the firm a
higher value its stock compared to the competing companies.
The cash flow statements can be used to determine the future
financial stability of the business. Free cash flows may reduce
risks and uncertainties that may accrue in the process to
conducting a business. It is disadvantageous since a stable cash
flow may only be realized in the long-term operations of the
business.
Earnings before Interest and Tax refers to the profits earned on
the operational and non-operational revenues less interest and
tax. It can be used to find the projections of a company in
comparison with the most viable competitors. One of its
disadvantages is that is does not indicate the effect of interest
and taxes on the general operations of the business.
Net operating income refers to the profitability of any business
and is calculated by first finding the net revenue then
subtracting all the operating expenses. It is used to indicate if a
firm has the ability to generate the required income. It can be
used to determine the company’s capitalization rate and the
amount of capital required by a firm for an effective running of
47. the company. It also identified which investment areas needs to
be seriously funded in order to maintain a particular
profitability rate. Net operating income statement gives a
detailed report that can be used for making viable business
decisions. It has the disadvantage of difficulty in categorizing
the type or kinds of business expenses.
Return on invested capital this an excess amount of what a
company makes over the weighted average cost of capital.
Return on invested capital can be used by managers in making
management decisions regarding the performance of various
levels of performance. It can be used for comparison with others
companies within the industry. It also measures the marketing
and management efficiency in handling the operations of the
company. One of the disadvantages that may accrue as a result
of using return on invested capital is that it uses approximated
values and projections in its arithmetic calculations hence
reducing the confidence of investors. It also does not recognize
that available intangible opportunities affecting the market and
the company. It contains incomplete tools used in the analysis
of data. Other types of non-GAAPs highlighted here are
modified funds from operating operation (MFFO) as well as the
broad cash flow (BCF).
Non-GAAPs measure are not only used by the management and
the company directors but other stakeholders are also interested
in the statements. The stakeholder may include the investors,
employees, lenders, the government, suppliers and the general
public. In an efficient market, all the state holders an equal
access to information relating the market conditions and any
other factor that may influence the economic condition. All the
stakeholders need such information in order to make viable
decisions regarding the company’s operations. The government
is interested in such a company because they need the financial
statements in order to determine the amount of tax that the
company is liable to pay to government. The investors are
opportunity seekers and are ready to take risks that can result
into making long-term returns with huge profit hence they need
48. these published company statements in order to make decisions
whether to invest in the company or not. The employees are
interested in such statement in order to determine whether the
company will continue employing them or not. The suppliers are
interested in knowing whether the company will continue in
operation in order to give them a continuous supply opportunity
in the near future. The public are interested in knowing whether
the company will continue offering them goods and services.
Inefficient market is a kind of market situation where the
available information is only known by a small segment of the
market (Rao, 2007). Information asymmetry is a situation in the
market where the buyers and sellers have varied information
regarding the availability of goods or services or any others
information that is related to the operations of the company and
the market trends. George Akerlof, Michael Spence and Joseph
Stiglitz in 2001 came up with the theory of information
asymmetry. They realized that the information asymmetry is
caused by the uncertainties in the market that are relating to the
quality uncertainties. Dr. Kelly argues that the management of
various do always abuse the use of generally accepted
accounting principles hence lowering its credibility in the
market place. Such abuses leads to bad earnings management
and vice versa (Soon, 2011). Earnings forecasts are majorly
done either on quarterly basis, half yearly basis (semiannually)
or annually. They indicates the financial performances of the
company at some specific points in times or after a given
trading periods. They show how the firms perform in terms of
the profits or the revenue generated over a given trading period.
Sometimes the non-generally accepted accounting principles do
not give the full disclosure of the financial position of a
company. It is therefore for firms trading with specific company
to use the slogan and phrase of buyer be aware of the rightful
information in the market. There should be a willing seller and
the willing buyer. Sometimes the directors and the managers of
a company may report the financial statements with a motive of
misleading the public or the government, investors, suppliers
49. with some hidden agenda of compensating against losses
incurred or in order to avoid paying of hefty taxes to the
government. Lack of full disclosure may also mislead the
supplier who largely depends of the financial statements of the
company in order to determine their net worth and their ability
to pay for the good supplied to them by suppliers. Non-GAAPs
measures are always intended to produce relevant information to
all other relevant stakeholders who have interest in the
company. The information produced is supposed to give
guidance on the decisions made regarding the investment
opportunities. Quality reporting has a positive relationship with
non-GAAPs measure. Quality reporting attracts the users of the
financial statements hence making the necessary judgements
and decisions. Regulations and governance controls the
operations of various types of companies by ensuring that they
remain within the bounds of the business they registered for and
that they are adhering to the current laws and policies.
Conclusion
The study by Dr. Kelly Wee Kheng Soon show a strong
relationship between non-GAAPs measures and the various
study variables. George Akerlof, Michael Spence and Joseph
Stiglitz arguments on non-GAAPs measures also indicates the
different methods of measurements and their correlation to the
study variable. It is therefore recommended that a further
research be carried on the effect of non-GAAPs on the foreign
exchange.References
Rao, A. (2007). A Theory of Market Efficiency. A Theory of
Market Efficiency, 1-36.
Soon, D. K. (2011, March 2). Earning Management: Is it Good
or Bad? Retrieved from SSRN:
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1775400
ACCG42004D Accounting Theory and Contemporary Issues -
Fall 2018
50. Proposal/Plan for Group Essay Research Project and
Presentation
The proposal is an outline of the project PREPARATION that
your group has engaged in. It contains an outline of what your
group intends to submit on Nov. 6th, and what they intend to
present on their assigned day using the following format. It
must be submitted and approved before 11:59 p.m. on Nov 27th.
OUTLINE of PLAN FOR ESSAY COMPLETION AND
PROJECT PRESENTATION
TITLE/TOPIC
Groups # & Member names
Scheduled Group Discussions
Dates
Summary of Discussion/s
List each meeting date
Include description of:
· Form of communication
· Attendees
· Discussion topics
51. PLAN
Presentation
Section
Expansion of section
Assigned to
(member name)
Introduction/
Purpose
Include a very brief summary of what you intend to present to
the group.
Literature Review
Each presenter will describe their assigned literature.
Additional Articles
Any additional material that supports the assigned readings can
be presented here.
Connection to course topics
Discussion of course topics to non-gaap measures and studies
and articles which have been presented
Conclusion
Summary of findings and impact on users.
Question for audience?
Audience question of presenters?