This document provides an overview of different perspectives on idealism and liberalism in international relations theory. It begins by defining idealism as the view that ideas have power and can motivate social and political action. It then discusses liberalism as the modern incarnation of idealism, noting key liberal assumptions around absolute gains and the iterated prisoner's dilemma. The document outlines different variants of liberalism, including liberal institutionalism, commercialism, and internationalism. It emphasizes liberalism's view of pluralism and how different actors shape foreign policy. Overall, the document aims to comprehensively introduce the basic principles and assumptions of idealism and liberalism.
Soraya Ghebleh - Selected Theories in International RelationsSoraya Ghebleh
This presentation describes some of the major theories in international relations and their subsets including liberalism, realism, constructivism, and critical issues theories.
Soraya Ghebleh - Selected Theories in International RelationsSoraya Ghebleh
This presentation describes some of the major theories in international relations and their subsets including liberalism, realism, constructivism, and critical issues theories.
This presentation is made by Samin VossoughiRad. American University for Humanities- Tbilisi campus
The security Dilemma is the them of the presentation and it has been explained exactly why states goes to war
Kenneth N. Waltz was an American political scientist who was a member of the faculty at both the University of California, Berkeley and Columbia University and one of the most prominent scholars in the field of international relations. He was a veteran of both World War II and the Korean War.
Waltz was a founder of neorealism, or structural realism, in international relations theory. Waltz's theories have been extensively debated within the field of international relations. In 1981, Waltz published a monograph arguing that in some cases the proliferation of nuclear weapons could increase the probability of international peace.
Security is the deepest and most abiding issue in politics. At its heart is the question: How can people live a decent and worthwhile existence, free from threats, intimidation and violence?' The search for security is therefore linked to the pursuit of order; and for the establishment of relative peace and stability amongst individuals and groups with different needs and interests. These concerns are commonly thought to resolved in the domestic realm by the existence of a sovereign state, a body capable of imposing its will on all the groups and institutions within its borders. Nevertheless, domestic security raises important issues, particularly about the roles of the institutions of the 'coercive state'; the police and the military. However, the issue of security is often considered to be especially pressing in international politics because the international realm, unlike the domestic realm, is anarchical, and therefore threatening and unstable by its nature. There has been fierce theoretical debate about whether this implies that international conflict and war are inevitable features of world affairs, and about the extent to which states are able to keep war at bay through cooperation. These debates have become increasingly pressing due to the advent of new challenges to international security, such as the rise of transnational terrorism and the proliferation of nuclear weapons. Finally, growing interest in the concept of 'human security' has shifted attention from the security of the state to the security of the individual, and, in the process, widened the notion of security to include, for instance, economic security, food security and personal security.
Realists advance a power politics model of world affairs in which security is primarily understood in terms of 'national security' and war is kept in check by the balance of power. The liberal belief in interdependence and balance in world affairs inclines them to place their faith in 'collective security', while critical theorists have either emphasized the extent to which state interactions are mediated by beliefs, values and assumptions, or exposed masculinist biases in the conventional realist paradigm.
The English school of International Relations ibrahimkoncak
This presentation is about the English School of International Relations Theory, presented in class as lecture to the BA students of International Relations.
This presentation is made by Samin VossoughiRad. American University for Humanities- Tbilisi campus
The security Dilemma is the them of the presentation and it has been explained exactly why states goes to war
Kenneth N. Waltz was an American political scientist who was a member of the faculty at both the University of California, Berkeley and Columbia University and one of the most prominent scholars in the field of international relations. He was a veteran of both World War II and the Korean War.
Waltz was a founder of neorealism, or structural realism, in international relations theory. Waltz's theories have been extensively debated within the field of international relations. In 1981, Waltz published a monograph arguing that in some cases the proliferation of nuclear weapons could increase the probability of international peace.
Security is the deepest and most abiding issue in politics. At its heart is the question: How can people live a decent and worthwhile existence, free from threats, intimidation and violence?' The search for security is therefore linked to the pursuit of order; and for the establishment of relative peace and stability amongst individuals and groups with different needs and interests. These concerns are commonly thought to resolved in the domestic realm by the existence of a sovereign state, a body capable of imposing its will on all the groups and institutions within its borders. Nevertheless, domestic security raises important issues, particularly about the roles of the institutions of the 'coercive state'; the police and the military. However, the issue of security is often considered to be especially pressing in international politics because the international realm, unlike the domestic realm, is anarchical, and therefore threatening and unstable by its nature. There has been fierce theoretical debate about whether this implies that international conflict and war are inevitable features of world affairs, and about the extent to which states are able to keep war at bay through cooperation. These debates have become increasingly pressing due to the advent of new challenges to international security, such as the rise of transnational terrorism and the proliferation of nuclear weapons. Finally, growing interest in the concept of 'human security' has shifted attention from the security of the state to the security of the individual, and, in the process, widened the notion of security to include, for instance, economic security, food security and personal security.
Realists advance a power politics model of world affairs in which security is primarily understood in terms of 'national security' and war is kept in check by the balance of power. The liberal belief in interdependence and balance in world affairs inclines them to place their faith in 'collective security', while critical theorists have either emphasized the extent to which state interactions are mediated by beliefs, values and assumptions, or exposed masculinist biases in the conventional realist paradigm.
The English school of International Relations ibrahimkoncak
This presentation is about the English School of International Relations Theory, presented in class as lecture to the BA students of International Relations.
The term ‘critical theory’ describes the neo-Marxist philosophy of the Frankfurt School. Frankfurt theorists drew on the critical methods of Karl Marx and Sigmund Freud....
This is the week to learn as much as possible about the key theoriestrappiteboni
This is the week to learn as much as possible about the key theories in international relations, why they are important, and how if at all they are related to policymaking. Among the three most important for us this week are realism, liberalism, and constructivism, though you may discover many other important theories like dependency theory, Marxist theory, radical theory (These three theories overlap in places as do the others). It is useful this week to gain a grasp of what the theories imply or assume about the behavior of states and sometimes citizens as international actors, and also begin to understand both the usefulness and limits of theory as instruments of policymaking. Whatever sources you use, make use of the Walt article and be able to explain how you believe to what extent theory relates to policymaking. Clearly, knowing the diversity and contested nature of theories will help you answer questions related to other assignments in the course as well as the three-part question below. Whenever possible, be sure to provide examples in supporting your arguments.
Instructions
In 5-7 double spaced pages in
Turabian
format, not including additional pages for title and references, answer the following 3 prompts below separately in a single document. You may write more pages if necessary. At least 7 sources must be used and may include the course text, Bible, and scholarly articles.
What is the relationship of theory to actual policy?
Are theories pre-packaged conceptual tools policymakers then apply to the interpretation of actual events? Expressed differently, is there a 1/1 correspondence between a particular event and a theory that explains it? If so, how do we explain two ‘realist’ (or liberals or constructivists, etc.) policymakers who both call for completely opposite policies in the same case, one opting for military intervention for example, while the other prefers a policy of restraint? What does this say about the relationship between theory and actual policy?
Can you identify a particular IR theory that appeals to you as the better explanation of human behavior than others
? Or would you say that the existence of multiple theories is an indication that perhaps all of them are plausible as possible interpretations of the same or different human events? Be clear and use examples to make your case.
Consider the
structure of the US government
as reflected in the
Constitution
(i.e., institutional checks and balances, power-sharing among federal and state authority, etc.) Does this structure reflect a realist, liberal, or some other theory of human behavior? In effect, is the ‘more perfect union’ of 1787 infused with a more realist or more liberal spirit, or maybe a bit of both. Explain the possibilities concisely yet clearly with examples?
...
June 3, 2024 Anti-Semitism Letter Sent to MIT President Kornbluth and MIT Cor...Levi Shapiro
Letter from the Congress of the United States regarding Anti-Semitism sent June 3rd to MIT President Sally Kornbluth, MIT Corp Chair, Mark Gorenberg
Dear Dr. Kornbluth and Mr. Gorenberg,
The US House of Representatives is deeply concerned by ongoing and pervasive acts of antisemitic
harassment and intimidation at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). Failing to act decisively to ensure a safe learning environment for all students would be a grave dereliction of your responsibilities as President of MIT and Chair of the MIT Corporation.
This Congress will not stand idly by and allow an environment hostile to Jewish students to persist. The House believes that your institution is in violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, and the inability or
unwillingness to rectify this violation through action requires accountability.
Postsecondary education is a unique opportunity for students to learn and have their ideas and beliefs challenged. However, universities receiving hundreds of millions of federal funds annually have denied
students that opportunity and have been hijacked to become venues for the promotion of terrorism, antisemitic harassment and intimidation, unlawful encampments, and in some cases, assaults and riots.
The House of Representatives will not countenance the use of federal funds to indoctrinate students into hateful, antisemitic, anti-American supporters of terrorism. Investigations into campus antisemitism by the Committee on Education and the Workforce and the Committee on Ways and Means have been expanded into a Congress-wide probe across all relevant jurisdictions to address this national crisis. The undersigned Committees will conduct oversight into the use of federal funds at MIT and its learning environment under authorities granted to each Committee.
• The Committee on Education and the Workforce has been investigating your institution since December 7, 2023. The Committee has broad jurisdiction over postsecondary education, including its compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, campus safety concerns over disruptions to the learning environment, and the awarding of federal student aid under the Higher Education Act.
• The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is investigating the sources of funding and other support flowing to groups espousing pro-Hamas propaganda and engaged in antisemitic harassment and intimidation of students. The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is the principal oversight committee of the US House of Representatives and has broad authority to investigate “any matter” at “any time” under House Rule X.
• The Committee on Ways and Means has been investigating several universities since November 15, 2023, when the Committee held a hearing entitled From Ivory Towers to Dark Corners: Investigating the Nexus Between Antisemitism, Tax-Exempt Universities, and Terror Financing. The Committee followed the hearing with letters to those institutions on January 10, 202
A Strategic Approach: GenAI in EducationPeter Windle
Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies such as Generative AI, Image Generators and Large Language Models have had a dramatic impact on teaching, learning and assessment over the past 18 months. The most immediate threat AI posed was to Academic Integrity with Higher Education Institutes (HEIs) focusing their efforts on combating the use of GenAI in assessment. Guidelines were developed for staff and students, policies put in place too. Innovative educators have forged paths in the use of Generative AI for teaching, learning and assessments leading to pockets of transformation springing up across HEIs, often with little or no top-down guidance, support or direction.
This Gasta posits a strategic approach to integrating AI into HEIs to prepare staff, students and the curriculum for an evolving world and workplace. We will highlight the advantages of working with these technologies beyond the realm of teaching, learning and assessment by considering prompt engineering skills, industry impact, curriculum changes, and the need for staff upskilling. In contrast, not engaging strategically with Generative AI poses risks, including falling behind peers, missed opportunities and failing to ensure our graduates remain employable. The rapid evolution of AI technologies necessitates a proactive and strategic approach if we are to remain relevant.
The French Revolution, which began in 1789, was a period of radical social and political upheaval in France. It marked the decline of absolute monarchies, the rise of secular and democratic republics, and the eventual rise of Napoleon Bonaparte. This revolutionary period is crucial in understanding the transition from feudalism to modernity in Europe.
For more information, visit-www.vavaclasses.com
Embracing GenAI - A Strategic ImperativePeter Windle
Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies such as Generative AI, Image Generators and Large Language Models have had a dramatic impact on teaching, learning and assessment over the past 18 months. The most immediate threat AI posed was to Academic Integrity with Higher Education Institutes (HEIs) focusing their efforts on combating the use of GenAI in assessment. Guidelines were developed for staff and students, policies put in place too. Innovative educators have forged paths in the use of Generative AI for teaching, learning and assessments leading to pockets of transformation springing up across HEIs, often with little or no top-down guidance, support or direction.
This Gasta posits a strategic approach to integrating AI into HEIs to prepare staff, students and the curriculum for an evolving world and workplace. We will highlight the advantages of working with these technologies beyond the realm of teaching, learning and assessment by considering prompt engineering skills, industry impact, curriculum changes, and the need for staff upskilling. In contrast, not engaging strategically with Generative AI poses risks, including falling behind peers, missed opportunities and failing to ensure our graduates remain employable. The rapid evolution of AI technologies necessitates a proactive and strategic approach if we are to remain relevant.
Biological screening of herbal drugs: Introduction and Need for
Phyto-Pharmacological Screening, New Strategies for evaluating
Natural Products, In vitro evaluation techniques for Antioxidants, Antimicrobial and Anticancer drugs. In vivo evaluation techniques
for Anti-inflammatory, Antiulcer, Anticancer, Wound healing, Antidiabetic, Hepatoprotective, Cardio protective, Diuretics and
Antifertility, Toxicity studies as per OECD guidelines
Synthetic Fiber Construction in lab .pptxPavel ( NSTU)
Synthetic fiber production is a fascinating and complex field that blends chemistry, engineering, and environmental science. By understanding these aspects, students can gain a comprehensive view of synthetic fiber production, its impact on society and the environment, and the potential for future innovations. Synthetic fibers play a crucial role in modern society, impacting various aspects of daily life, industry, and the environment. ynthetic fibers are integral to modern life, offering a range of benefits from cost-effectiveness and versatility to innovative applications and performance characteristics. While they pose environmental challenges, ongoing research and development aim to create more sustainable and eco-friendly alternatives. Understanding the importance of synthetic fibers helps in appreciating their role in the economy, industry, and daily life, while also emphasizing the need for sustainable practices and innovation.
Safalta Digital marketing institute in Noida, provide complete applications that encompass a huge range of virtual advertising and marketing additives, which includes search engine optimization, virtual communication advertising, pay-per-click on marketing, content material advertising, internet analytics, and greater. These university courses are designed for students who possess a comprehensive understanding of virtual marketing strategies and attributes.Safalta Digital Marketing Institute in Noida is a first choice for young individuals or students who are looking to start their careers in the field of digital advertising. The institute gives specialized courses designed and certification.
for beginners, providing thorough training in areas such as SEO, digital communication marketing, and PPC training in Noida. After finishing the program, students receive the certifications recognised by top different universitie, setting a strong foundation for a successful career in digital marketing.
1. professor timothy c. lim
california state university, los angeles
tclim@calstatela.edu
2. an introduction
―In the period between World War I and World War II, the major
challenger
to the realist perspective was idealism. Idealists questioned many
of the basic tenets of realism and suggested that it would
be possible to transform the world of power-seeking
and war into one in which peace and cooperation
among state might prevail.‖
before going any further, it would be useful, even
essential, to discuss the connotations of the word
―idealism‖ …
3. the meaning of idealism
some questions
so, what does the term ―idealism‖ suggest to you?
is idealism the same as utopianism? does the word
itself give an advantage to realists in the competition for
theoretical dominance?
4. the meaning of idealism
key point
the core meaning of idealism can be found in the first four
letters of the word:
5. the meaning of idealism
applied to world politics, an idea is a mental construct, a belief about
how things should or can be in the world
more importantly, ideas imbue people with a sense
of purpose, with a rationale and motive for action,
with a framework for understanding the world
in short, idealism tells us that ideas matter; even
more, it tells us that ideas have power, even
great power
6. the meaning of idealism
to see the importance of ideas (in the social
world) and to see their power, let‘s consider
an underlying message in the film,
V for Vendetta
8. V for Vendetta and
idealism
key points
in this depiction of idealism, it is clear that ideas are
powerful and deadly forces in the world: ideas
matter and not in a utopian, ―tree-hugging,‖
pacifistic sense
ideas matter by motivating and organizing human and
social action—what we do is a product of what we think!
9. idealism and liberalism
as the author tells us, idealism (partly due to the connotations of the
term) has been replaced with different labels, the two most common
of which are _________________ and __________________liberalism constructivism
―Liberalism is currently the most well-developed
paradigmatic challenger to realism. Unlike realists …
liberals believe that significant global cooperation is
possible and that we can move beyond the power politics
at the heart of the realist paradigm‖
10. the liberal paradigm
of course, it is critical that we not simply know what liberalism asserts;
rather, we must know the basis for liberal assertions
this means we must understand the assumptions and basic tenets
underlying the liberal perspective; in addition, we must understand
the implications of these assumptions and tenets
let us turn to these issues next …
11. basic assumptions and tenets of liberalism
―For liberals, the key assumption is that peace and cooperation among
states can produce absolute gains for all. As long as a state is
better off as a result of cooperating with others, the gains of others
should not matter‖
how does the liberal assumption of absolute gains differ
from realism—that is, what do realists have to say on this
same basic issue? why is the difference important?
and who is right?
12. basic assumptions and tenets of liberalism
review: absolute versus relative gains
one way to understand the difference between relative vs. absolute
gains is to consider the notion of ―keeping up with
the Joneses,‖ which suggests that
we cannot be satisfied with more and
better stuff if our neighbors have even
more and even better things …
is this true? does it have to be
true?
and what‘s the basic issue anyway?
13. basic assumptions and tenets of liberalism
the debate over absolute vs. relative gains is only one of many issues;
liberals also argue that realist assertions about the lack of trust in
the international system is also problematic ...
14. basic assumptions and tenets of liberalism
to support their position, liberals draw from the same game-theoretic
models used by realists, one of the most salient of which is the
prisoners’ dilemma. if you recall, realist use the prisoner‘s dilemma
to suggest that cooperation is unlikely because of the
inherent lack of trust between two actors …
yet, liberals have shown that the prisoner‘s dilemma
scenario is unrealistic: it is based on on a single
interaction between parties. in the real world, however,
parties interact on a repeated (or iterated) basis
15. basic assumptions and tenets of liberalism
―The key is to think in terms of what [Axelrod] calls an ‗iterated
prisoners‘ dilemma‘ in which the game is not a one-time event but
one in which the same players repeatedly play the game. What he
found is that one can elicit a good deal of cooperation in the game
following
a ‗tit-for-tat‘ strategy. One starts out with a cooperative
strategy, and from there one mimics whatever the other
player does. If the other player selects the cooperative
option, you do the same. If the other player defects
and fails to cooperate, you do likewise …‖
16. basic assumptions and tenets of liberalism
the last sentence in the foregoing passage (‖If the other player defects
and fails to cooperate, you do likewise‖) is key …
why?
short answer. failing to cooperate, in an iterated game, has
clear negative consequences. for this reason, an overarching
authority is not necessary—thus, the problem of anarchy can be
mitigated in an international system in which the key actors are required
to interact with each other on a constant, repeated basis!
18. basic assumptions and tenets of liberalism
let’s consider an example mentioned in the video ...
say, the US and the Soviets agree not to build new types or more
destructive nuclear weapons …
what happens if one side cheats and
the other side finds out?
does cooperation over time tend to lead
to more cooperation and trust?
19. logic of iteration in cooperation
Agreement
T1
Cheating
T2
No Cheating
T2
Resumption of arms buildup
T3
Cont. Cooperation
T3
No Cheating
T4
Cont. Cooperation
T5
Trust-based Rel.
T5,T6, T7 …
20. basic assumptions and tenets of liberalism
the foregoing conclusion leads to another, less obvious assumption in
liberalism, which revolves over fundamental disagreements about
the nature of anarchy …
realists assume anarchy to be an unchanging and unchangeable
element of international relations, while liberals consider anarchy to be
a scope condition, that is, a condition that can exist in various forms,
with varying strength—e.g., anarchy can be weak or strong,
hostile or friendly, etc.
21. basic assumptions and tenets of liberalism
key implication. if anarchy is relatively ―weak‖ and ―friendly,‖ the
struggle for power among states may become a secondary or even
tertiary, rather than overriding concern—it may simply not matter
much
… and when the struggle for power becomes less important, the nature
of international relations is subject to significant change (consider
relations between the US and Britain or between Germany and
France)
consider, for example, the
22. x x x
basic assumptions and tenets of liberalism
…in the dynamics of the world today, there is no arms race among
major powers; there is no balancing or significant rebalancing of
power taking place; and there is no clear-cut struggle for power
among the major countries; instead major powers cooperate
across
a range of
important
issues
let‘s consider
a few other
points …
23. basic assumptions and tenets of liberalism
liberals have always been skeptical of the overriding power attached
to anarchy; but, they have also been skeptical of the assumption of
state rationality and coherence.* they tell us that …
states are not monolithic and states
cannot be isolated from their societies; this
means other actors (within and outside the
state) have always played a role in
shaping international relations or world
politics—these assertions have important
implications. in particular …
* introducing material not in the text
24. basic assumptions and tenets of liberalism
liberalism tells us that a range of actors
with varying interests and degrees
of power plays different roles in
shaping state policies and
interstate relations
moreover, in this view, we should
expect that the range, power, and
roles of various groups varies
depending on regime type (we
will return to this point shortly)
International
Relations
Executive
Branch
Congress
TNCs
NGOs
Media
Social
Movements
Various
state
agencies
Social
classes
Political
parties
25. basic assumptions and tenets of liberalism
the last slide introduces an important analytical element of liberalism
(one that is largely missing from realism)…
this element revolves around the concept of ____________
which at a generic level, simply tells us that multiple
actors play a role in shaping international relations
this is an important notion, but it is incomplete:
we also need to know something about
the actors themselves …
International
Relations
Executive
Branch
Congress
TNCs
NGOs
Media
Social
Movements
Various
state
agencies
Social
classes
Political
parties
pluralism
26. basic assumptions and tenets of liberalism
some questions
are all actors motivated by the same basic set of interests?
do all actors exercise power in the same way? are they all
equally powerful?
in short, are all actors basically
the same?
the short answer to all three
questions is simply ―no‖
27. basic assumptions and tenets of liberalism
note. in pluralism, there is an assumption of rationality—or self-
interest–among actors, but there is also an understanding that their
self-interests are not premised on the same overriding ―national
interest‖
simply put, different actors have different interests,
meaning that actors‘ interests are not
necessarily the same as the ―national
interest‖
this has important implications in
explaining world politics …
28. basic assumptions and tenets of liberalism
a few implications
actors compete to shape policy and influence the state
state policies may lack coherence in terms of a single
overarching national goal
the competition to shape state policy, in other
words, may lead to contradictions
and inconsistencies, which
makes predicting world politics
more complex and contingent.
let‘s consider an example …
29. basic assumptions and tenets of liberalism
think about US-China relations today …
before discussing, let‘s watch a short video that gives a sense of some
of the issues liberals are focused on (note: the points are not
necessarily obvious, so think carefully about how the video—actually
three different news reports—reflect liberal ideas and principles.
there are additional questions at the beginning of the video itself)
31. basic assumptions and tenets of liberalism
key points …
on the one hand, we have those who believe China represents a
fundamental threat to the long-term interests and security of the US:
they propose a hostile non-cooperative relationship
on the other hand are those who benefit from trade and economic
exchange with China: they propose deeper, closer economic
integration and cooperation. others are primarily concerned about
human rights…
advocates of these and other competing
positions seek to and often do influence and
shape policy ...
32. basic assumptions and tenets of liberalism
the upshot? US-China relations is not a product of a set
of unified policies where everyone shares the same goals and
motivations, but instead reflects negotiation, compromise, power-
brokering, and so on
importantly, this is likely much more the case in the US than in China …
but why would this be the case? (hint. think about the different types
of political regimes in each country.)
with this broad introduction in mind, let‘s move
on to a brief discussion of ―subgroups‖ or
variants within the liberal perspective
33. variants of liberalism
opening note
the variants of liberalism are not fully consistent with one another on
basic principles vis-à-vis realism. for example, some variants mostly
accept realist assumptions, but assert that there is room at the
edges for liberal principles to work; other variants argue that liberal
principles can supplant the anarchy of realism completely (albeit,
not in the short-run)
let‘s begin with the most ―limited‖ variant of liberalism,
liberal institutionalism ...
34. variants of liberalism
liberal institutionalism
―Proponents of liberal institutionalism look to international institutions to
reduce the anarchy of the international system. By institutions, they
mean ‗the rules of that govern elements of world politics
and the organizations that help implement those rules.‘
Central to this institutionalist perspective is a formal system
of international law that regulates and constrains the
behavior of states and thereby limits their sovereign ability
to act as they wish in some areas …‖
35. variants of liberalism
liberal institutionalism
liberal institutionalism, as the name implies, asserts that institutions
are important; however, they see the role of institutions as generally
limited under conditions of anarchy
institutions, in this regard, are a functional substitute for an
overarching sovereign power in the international system; they can
ameliorate anarchy by allowing cooperation to take
place in areas that states are willing to cede
sovereignty, but they cannot function in those areas
that states are unwilling to relinquish sovereignty
36. variants of liberalism
liberal commercialism
liberal commercialism suggests that commercial—or economic—
interests create common bonds across borders that make
international cooperation possible. in the present era, scholars
have focused on the continued expansion and
deepening of economic ties through the
processes of globalization
question
in what way does economic globalization
contribute to greater peace and cooperation
among nations?
37. variants of liberalism
liberal internationalism
liberal internationalism refers back to the notion that regime type has
an important affect on the nature of relations between and
among states; it based on the Kantian notion of ―perpetual
peace,‖ which tells us that, ―in places where government is
based on consent of the citizenry, there will be a reluctance
to go to war because of the hardships that war invariably
imposes on those citizens. In fact, Kant‘s federation of free
states was premised on the assumption that its members
would be republics with this domestic disincentive
to go to war‖ || consider the following figure
38. variants of liberalism
using proxy categories for
democracy developed by
Freedom House, this table
shows that full democracies
(i.e., liberal democracies) do
not engage in violence with
each other
what else does the table show?
39. variants of liberalism
liberal internationalism
there are other important elements of liberal internationalism of which
we must be aware, and these are nicely summarized in the
article by Michael Doyle, ―Liberalism and World Politics‖
quick point
Michael Doyle is generally considered one of the leading
liberals in IR scholarship; he developed the notion of the
democratic peace thesis, an extension of Kantian thought
40. variants of liberalism
Doyle on liberal internationalism
―Despite the contradictions of liberal pacifism and liberal imperialism, I
find, with Kant and other liberal republican, that liberalism
does leave a coherent legacy on foreign affairs. Liberal
states are different. They are indeed peaceful, yet they
are also prone to make war, as the U.S. and our ‗freedom
fighters‘ are now doing …‖
in this passage, Doyle mentions three liberal approaches;
the first two of which are contradictory (part of his
aim is to reconcile these competing views) …
41. variants of liberalism
what is liberal pacifism?
based on ideas espoused by Joseph Schumpeter, who
argued that capitalism and democracy are forces for
peace: in capitalism, peoples‘ energies are absorbed
in production, which in turn trains people in ―economic
rationalism,‖ and rational people demand democratic
governance. Democracy, in turn, prevents those who
would gain from war (war profiteers and military
aristocrats) from going to war since ―no democracy
would pursue a minority interest and tolerate the high
costs of imperialism‖
42. variants of liberalism
what is liberal imperialism?
based on the thinking of Machiavelli, who believed that liberty
encouraged ―increased population and property, which
grow when the citizens know their lives and goods
are secure from arbitrary seizure.‖ Secure in their
lives at home, free citizens are more willing to fight
abroad to gain more for themselves and for their
states—it is important to emphasize that Machiavelli‘s
argument was premised on the realist notion that this
willingness is based on the knowledge that there are
other states with similar aims
43. variants of liberalism
Doyle on liberal internationalism
Liberalism internationalism helps to bridge the divide between
liberal pacifism and liberal imperialism (both of which can
find support in the real world) by … doing what?
answer. it recognizes that liberal states are both pacifistic
and imperialistic, but that their behavior toward other
states hinges on the internal political make-up of those
other states—i.e., if the other state is illiberal or non-
democratic, then violence is more likely; if the other state
is also democratic, then violence is less likely
44. variants of liberalism
Doyle on liberal internationalism
to repeat…
liberal internationalism tells us that while liberal states
are, in fact, less likely to engage in war, this propensity
toward peaceful relations is true only between and
among liberal states themselves
liberal states, in short, create a separate peace
or a zone of peace with other liberal societies
45. variants of liberalism
Doyle on liberal internationalism
the zone of peace, again, is limited to liberal states; outside this zone,
liberal states often engage in international ―imprudence‖…
in other words, in relations with non-democratic states,
liberal states show very little restraint in the use of
violence, a product, perhaps, of a ―striking distrust‖
of non-liberal states :: note the implication here:
under conditions of anarchy, trust is difficult to
establish between non-democracies, but much
easier between/among democracies
46. variants of liberalism
Doyle on liberal internationalism
Doyle also identifies three ―definitive articles‖ of peace espoused by
Kant in his articulation of liberal internationalism. these are:
the need for a republican state
the creation of a pacific (i.e., peaceful) federation
or union among liberal states
the establishment of a cosmopolitan law to
operate in conjunction with the pacific union
for our purposes, we need not discuss these ―articles‖ in any
detail
47. variants of liberalism
back to Bova
the diversity of liberal approaches can be confusing, but as Doyle did
with the two competing versions of liberalism (pacifism and
imperialism), it may also be possible to bring the three main
contemporary variants (institutionalism, commercialism,
internationalism) together as well
in fact, scholars have already done this; one good
example is the Kantian Triangle …
48. variants of liberalism
the Kantian triangle
Individually, each variant of liberalism has its limits; but, as Bova
asserts, the ―strongest statement of the liberal perspective emerges
when we combine the essential assumptions of all three liberal
subgroups …‖
this is what Russett and Oneal refer to as the
Kantian Triangle: international institutions,
economic interdependence, and democracy
49. variants of liberalism
the Kantian triangle
the basic idea is simple: even if one aspect of the triangle is not enough
to guarantee peace and cooperation, when the elements are
combine they mutually reinforce the global propensity toward
international cooperation and peace
taken together, they can replace the ―vicious
circle of fear, mistrust, and conflict‖ with a
―virtuous‖ circle of mutual interests and cooperation
produced by the mutually reinforcing impact of all
three points of the triangle
50. variants of liberalism
summing up thus far …
so, what do you think? how would you assess
the two theoretical paradigms we have examined
thus far? is one obviously more useful and better
than the other? or, do both offer important insights?
are they mutually incompatible, or do they simply
view different parts of a larger, more complicated
whole?