This document provides a scoring guide for classroom observations of teachers based on 15 indicators of effective teaching practices. It lists the observable indicators for each standard and provides a scoring rubric for each one. Specific behaviors are identified and assigned point values. By adding up the total points from observed indicators, teachers receive a overall rating for each standard of proficient, progressing or needs improvement. The guide also includes descriptions of non-classroom observable indicators that are assessed through other means like lesson plans and compliance with school policies.
Nces school improvement plan s.y. 2016 2019Lindy Pujante
The purpose of this Executive Summary is to provide the public a glimpse of the school’s performance through narrative reports of the programs and services of the school in support of student learning, identification of stakeholders, the engagement of the existing stakeholders and the current issues and trends affecting the school’s performance. By doing so, each member of the school and the community will become fully aware of the over-all performance of Naga Central Elementary School that will become the baseline for assessment towards continuous improvement thus providing the best teaching-learning outcomes for the years to come. (UNEDITED DRAFT)
Nces school improvement plan s.y. 2016 2019Lindy Pujante
The purpose of this Executive Summary is to provide the public a glimpse of the school’s performance through narrative reports of the programs and services of the school in support of student learning, identification of stakeholders, the engagement of the existing stakeholders and the current issues and trends affecting the school’s performance. By doing so, each member of the school and the community will become fully aware of the over-all performance of Naga Central Elementary School that will become the baseline for assessment towards continuous improvement thus providing the best teaching-learning outcomes for the years to come. (UNEDITED DRAFT)
This guide is made with you – our school heads, teachers, school staff, and other school
stakeholders in mind. In crafting this guide, we consulted with planning experts and
experts from the field – principals, supervisors, and teachers – to ensure that School
Improvement Planning becomes easier and effective for you.
SPE-226 Educating the Exceptional LearnerBenchmark Assessm.docxrafbolet0
SPE-226 Educating the Exceptional Learner
Benchmark Assessment and Rubric
Targeted Essential Learning
Effective teachers implement lesson plans that utilize diversified strategies to meet the learning needs of students with varying degrees of cognitive abilities. Effective teachers are able to adapt instruction based on learner needs. (InTASC 2; CEC 3, 4, 5)
Assessment Tool Selected
Project
0. Accommodations and Modification of Lesson Plan
0. Report - Reflective Analysis
Specific Performance/Task(s)
Implement lesson plans. (InTASC 2a)
Select and utilize best practice implementation strategies appropriate to different developmental levels. (CEC 5.1)
Implement differentiated strategies that address diverse learners. (CEC 3.2)
Adapt instruction based on student needs. (InTASC 2b)
Select and apply evidenced-based instructional strategies to serve students with specific disabilities. (CEC 5.0)
Select, adapt, and use techniques to modify learning environments. (CEC 5.5)
Design instruction to meet student needs. (InTASC 2f)
Select, adapt, create, and use curricular materials. (CEC 3http://www.cec.sped.org/~/media/Files/Standards/Professional%20Preparation%20Standards/Initial%20Preparation%20Standards%20with%20Elaborations.pdf.2)
Relevancy of Task to Teacher Candidate
Students must be able to implement research-based lesson plans which reflect accommodations and modifications for learners with disabilities.
Assessment: Student Prompts/Teacher Directions
1. Individual: Teaching for Exceptionalities (Benchmark Assessment)
1. General Practicum information:
1. Students’ practicum experiences should follow the practicum experience requirements, including the diversity and hour requirements for this course.
1. Benchmark Assessment:
2. Contact a school, identify yourself as a GCU student, and request an opportunity to observe and participate in two different educational settings/grade levels that serve students with mild to moderate disabilities. Legally, you may not ask what the student’s disability is and you may not look at the IEP without parental permission. Of the total 15 hours required schedule to spend a minimum of 5 hours with the student during this practicum experience in one of the educational settings.
2. Spend a total of 15 hours, approximately 7.5 hours in two different grade levels. Each setting needs to serve students with mild to moderate disabilities.
2. During your initial observations of the student, take note of which modalities are strongest for the student (auditory, visual, kinesthetic, etc.). Also, note the curricular areas in which the student exhibits strengths and weaknesses.
2. Obtain a lesson plan that has been written by the teacher in a curricular area that is a challenge for the student (math, writing, reading, science, etc.). Make a copy of this lesson to submit with the Benchmark Assessment. Review the learning objective, activity/assignment description, and assessment (where applicable).
2. Write an Accommodation/L.
This guide is made with you – our school heads, teachers, school staff, and other school
stakeholders in mind. In crafting this guide, we consulted with planning experts and
experts from the field – principals, supervisors, and teachers – to ensure that School
Improvement Planning becomes easier and effective for you.
SPE-226 Educating the Exceptional LearnerBenchmark Assessm.docxrafbolet0
SPE-226 Educating the Exceptional Learner
Benchmark Assessment and Rubric
Targeted Essential Learning
Effective teachers implement lesson plans that utilize diversified strategies to meet the learning needs of students with varying degrees of cognitive abilities. Effective teachers are able to adapt instruction based on learner needs. (InTASC 2; CEC 3, 4, 5)
Assessment Tool Selected
Project
0. Accommodations and Modification of Lesson Plan
0. Report - Reflective Analysis
Specific Performance/Task(s)
Implement lesson plans. (InTASC 2a)
Select and utilize best practice implementation strategies appropriate to different developmental levels. (CEC 5.1)
Implement differentiated strategies that address diverse learners. (CEC 3.2)
Adapt instruction based on student needs. (InTASC 2b)
Select and apply evidenced-based instructional strategies to serve students with specific disabilities. (CEC 5.0)
Select, adapt, and use techniques to modify learning environments. (CEC 5.5)
Design instruction to meet student needs. (InTASC 2f)
Select, adapt, create, and use curricular materials. (CEC 3http://www.cec.sped.org/~/media/Files/Standards/Professional%20Preparation%20Standards/Initial%20Preparation%20Standards%20with%20Elaborations.pdf.2)
Relevancy of Task to Teacher Candidate
Students must be able to implement research-based lesson plans which reflect accommodations and modifications for learners with disabilities.
Assessment: Student Prompts/Teacher Directions
1. Individual: Teaching for Exceptionalities (Benchmark Assessment)
1. General Practicum information:
1. Students’ practicum experiences should follow the practicum experience requirements, including the diversity and hour requirements for this course.
1. Benchmark Assessment:
2. Contact a school, identify yourself as a GCU student, and request an opportunity to observe and participate in two different educational settings/grade levels that serve students with mild to moderate disabilities. Legally, you may not ask what the student’s disability is and you may not look at the IEP without parental permission. Of the total 15 hours required schedule to spend a minimum of 5 hours with the student during this practicum experience in one of the educational settings.
2. Spend a total of 15 hours, approximately 7.5 hours in two different grade levels. Each setting needs to serve students with mild to moderate disabilities.
2. During your initial observations of the student, take note of which modalities are strongest for the student (auditory, visual, kinesthetic, etc.). Also, note the curricular areas in which the student exhibits strengths and weaknesses.
2. Obtain a lesson plan that has been written by the teacher in a curricular area that is a challenge for the student (math, writing, reading, science, etc.). Make a copy of this lesson to submit with the Benchmark Assessment. Review the learning objective, activity/assignment description, and assessment (where applicable).
2. Write an Accommodation/L.
Student Learning Objectives, Mississippi Department of Education, Research in Action, Educator Effectiveness, Assessment Literacy, Assessment, Teacher Effectiveness, Policy
Biological screening of herbal drugs: Introduction and Need for
Phyto-Pharmacological Screening, New Strategies for evaluating
Natural Products, In vitro evaluation techniques for Antioxidants, Antimicrobial and Anticancer drugs. In vivo evaluation techniques
for Anti-inflammatory, Antiulcer, Anticancer, Wound healing, Antidiabetic, Hepatoprotective, Cardio protective, Diuretics and
Antifertility, Toxicity studies as per OECD guidelines
Unit 8 - Information and Communication Technology (Paper I).pdfThiyagu K
This slides describes the basic concepts of ICT, basics of Email, Emerging Technology and Digital Initiatives in Education. This presentations aligns with the UGC Paper I syllabus.
A workshop hosted by the South African Journal of Science aimed at postgraduate students and early career researchers with little or no experience in writing and publishing journal articles.
Read| The latest issue of The Challenger is here! We are thrilled to announce that our school paper has qualified for the NATIONAL SCHOOLS PRESS CONFERENCE (NSPC) 2024. Thank you for your unwavering support and trust. Dive into the stories that made us stand out!
Executive Directors Chat Leveraging AI for Diversity, Equity, and InclusionTechSoup
Let’s explore the intersection of technology and equity in the final session of our DEI series. Discover how AI tools, like ChatGPT, can be used to support and enhance your nonprofit's DEI initiatives. Participants will gain insights into practical AI applications and get tips for leveraging technology to advance their DEI goals.
2024.06.01 Introducing a competency framework for languag learning materials ...Sandy Millin
http://sandymillin.wordpress.com/iateflwebinar2024
Published classroom materials form the basis of syllabuses, drive teacher professional development, and have a potentially huge influence on learners, teachers and education systems. All teachers also create their own materials, whether a few sentences on a blackboard, a highly-structured fully-realised online course, or anything in between. Despite this, the knowledge and skills needed to create effective language learning materials are rarely part of teacher training, and are mostly learnt by trial and error.
Knowledge and skills frameworks, generally called competency frameworks, for ELT teachers, trainers and managers have existed for a few years now. However, until I created one for my MA dissertation, there wasn’t one drawing together what we need to know and do to be able to effectively produce language learning materials.
This webinar will introduce you to my framework, highlighting the key competencies I identified from my research. It will also show how anybody involved in language teaching (any language, not just English!), teacher training, managing schools or developing language learning materials can benefit from using the framework.
June 3, 2024 Anti-Semitism Letter Sent to MIT President Kornbluth and MIT Cor...Levi Shapiro
Letter from the Congress of the United States regarding Anti-Semitism sent June 3rd to MIT President Sally Kornbluth, MIT Corp Chair, Mark Gorenberg
Dear Dr. Kornbluth and Mr. Gorenberg,
The US House of Representatives is deeply concerned by ongoing and pervasive acts of antisemitic
harassment and intimidation at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). Failing to act decisively to ensure a safe learning environment for all students would be a grave dereliction of your responsibilities as President of MIT and Chair of the MIT Corporation.
This Congress will not stand idly by and allow an environment hostile to Jewish students to persist. The House believes that your institution is in violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, and the inability or
unwillingness to rectify this violation through action requires accountability.
Postsecondary education is a unique opportunity for students to learn and have their ideas and beliefs challenged. However, universities receiving hundreds of millions of federal funds annually have denied
students that opportunity and have been hijacked to become venues for the promotion of terrorism, antisemitic harassment and intimidation, unlawful encampments, and in some cases, assaults and riots.
The House of Representatives will not countenance the use of federal funds to indoctrinate students into hateful, antisemitic, anti-American supporters of terrorism. Investigations into campus antisemitism by the Committee on Education and the Workforce and the Committee on Ways and Means have been expanded into a Congress-wide probe across all relevant jurisdictions to address this national crisis. The undersigned Committees will conduct oversight into the use of federal funds at MIT and its learning environment under authorities granted to each Committee.
• The Committee on Education and the Workforce has been investigating your institution since December 7, 2023. The Committee has broad jurisdiction over postsecondary education, including its compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, campus safety concerns over disruptions to the learning environment, and the awarding of federal student aid under the Higher Education Act.
• The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is investigating the sources of funding and other support flowing to groups espousing pro-Hamas propaganda and engaged in antisemitic harassment and intimidation of students. The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is the principal oversight committee of the US House of Representatives and has broad authority to investigate “any matter” at “any time” under House Rule X.
• The Committee on Ways and Means has been investigating several universities since November 15, 2023, when the Committee held a hearing entitled From Ivory Towers to Dark Corners: Investigating the Nexus Between Antisemitism, Tax-Exempt Universities, and Terror Financing. The Committee followed the hearing with letters to those institutions on January 10, 202
Synthetic Fiber Construction in lab .pptxPavel ( NSTU)
Synthetic fiber production is a fascinating and complex field that blends chemistry, engineering, and environmental science. By understanding these aspects, students can gain a comprehensive view of synthetic fiber production, its impact on society and the environment, and the potential for future innovations. Synthetic fibers play a crucial role in modern society, impacting various aspects of daily life, industry, and the environment. ynthetic fibers are integral to modern life, offering a range of benefits from cost-effectiveness and versatility to innovative applications and performance characteristics. While they pose environmental challenges, ongoing research and development aim to create more sustainable and eco-friendly alternatives. Understanding the importance of synthetic fibers helps in appreciating their role in the economy, industry, and daily life, while also emphasizing the need for sustainable practices and innovation.
Macroeconomics- Movie Location
This will be used as part of your Personal Professional Portfolio once graded.
Objective:
Prepare a presentation or a paper using research, basic comparative analysis, data organization and application of economic information. You will make an informed assessment of an economic climate outside of the United States to accomplish an entertainment industry objective.
1. DepED – Bacolod City
SY 2021-2022 IPCRF PPST Indicators
Scoring Guide for Classroom Observation
CLASSROOM OBSERVABLE INDICATORS (COI)
Indicator No. 1: Apply knowledge of content within and across curriculum teaching areas.
Explained the concept/s taught, especially the complex and difficult ones, to the level of the learners
but without oversimplifying that may introduce misconceptions to learners (2)
Engaged learners in structured learning episodes and activities that enable them to make concrete
and meaningful connections between and among the concept/s taught to the content of other
learning areas or to real-life experiences (2)
Translated complex and difficult concepts into meaningful learning experiences (2)
Processed learners’ ideas and/or questions thoroughly (2)
Identified learners’ misconceptions and corrected the same promptly (2)
Used appropriate concepts, ideas, or examples from other learning areas to correctly develop the
concept taught (1)
Presented and communicated the concept/s with clarity and free from misconceptions (1)
Responded to leaners’ questions clearly and accurately (1)
Employed strategies that are appropriate to effectively facilitate learners’ understanding of the
concept/s taught (1)
Used instructional materials that are appropriate that are helpful in making learners understand the
concept/s taught (1)
Employed assessment methods and tools that are consistent with the learning objectives with due
consideration individual or group learning needs (1)
Exhibited good command of the medium of instruction (0.5)
Maximized instructional time (0.5)
Aligned the content within and across curriculum teaching areas in MELCs. (1)
Applied the content within and across curriculum teaching areas logically. (1)
*Specific observation notes that do not fall under the sub-indicators but are related to the indicator
or expectation will be given a point equivalent of (1).
Indicator No. 3: Displayed proficient use of Mother Tongue, Filipino and English to facilitate teaching
and learning.
Demonstrated the ability in transitioning from one language to another in order to help learners
understand the concept/s taught (except in English and Filipino subjects where the teacher is
expected to use either English or Filipino only and in order to assist learners in understanding the
texts is for the teacher to unlock difficult terms using simple and precise vocabulary) (2)
Encouraged learners to express their ideas or questions in any language they are comfortable with
(except in English and Filipino subjects where learners are to be encouraged to speak English or
Filipino only) (2)
Exhibited fluency in the three languages (i.e. does not code switch while using a particular
language in discussing, explaining or presenting ideas/concepts) (1)
Communicated ideas/concepts with correct diction and pronunciation, particularly when using
English as the medium of instruction (0.5)
The instructional material/s especially the reading materials used:
was/were appropriate to the level and type of learners (0.5)
has/have provisions for unlocking of difficulties or translations (0.5)
The psychosocial climate of the learning space was characterized by a/an/the:
encouraging attitude of the teacher towards communicating through the language one is
comfortable with (1)
To determine the teacher’s score in this indicator, sum up the point equivalents of checked sub-
indicators duly supported by the specific observations captured in the Observation Notes Form. Refer
to the table below for the Classroom Observation Rating corresponding to the total point equivalent of
the checked sub-indicators:
For Proficient:
Total points equivalent of the checked sub-indicators Classroom Observation Rating
10 7
9 6
8 5
7 4
6 3
2. DepED – Bacolod City
SY 2021-2022 IPCRF PPST Indicators
Scoring Guide for Classroom Observation
supportive community of learners who are confident in expressing themselves in conversing with
each other in group activities, responding to the teacher’s questions and feedback, or in
addressing the class during presentations in any of the three languages (1)
Processed learners’ mispronunciation, grammatical construction, miscues in reading particularly
in English (0.5)
*Specific observation notes that do not fall under the sub-indicators but are related to the indicator
or expectation will be given a point equivalent of (1).
To determine the teacher’s score in this indicator, sum up the point equivalents of checked sub-indicators
duly supported by the specific observations captured in the Observation Notes Form. Refer to the table
below for the Classroom Observation Rating corresponding to the total point equivalent of the checked
sub-indicators:
For Proficient:
Total points equivalent of the checked sub-indicators Classroom Observation Rating
7 7
6 6
5 5
4 4
3 3
Indicator 4: Used effective verbal and non-verbal classroom communication strategies to support
learners’ understanding, participation, engagement and achievement.
gave students with positive comments and praises (1)
provided students with the redirection for proper guidance (1)
gave out follow-up questions (1)
provided opportunity for the students to ask questions (2)
showed affirmation on the responses of students (2)
set the standards before the class started (1)
ensured active participation of students (1)
allowed learners to express their ideas/opinions (2)
provided equal opportunities to learners (1)
facilitated the discussion (0.5)
verified positive hand gestures (0.5)
*Specific observation notes that do not fall under the sub-indicators but are related to the indicator
or expectation will be given a point equivalent of (1).
To determine the teacher’s score in this indicator, sum up the point equivalents of checked sub-indicators
duly supported by the specific observations captured in the Observation Notes Form. Refer to the table
below for the Classroom Observation Rating corresponding to the total point equivalent of the checked
sub-indicators:
For Proficient:
Total points equivalent of the checked sub-indicators Classroom Observation Rating
9 7
8 6
7 5
6 4
5 3
Implemented the structured learning episodes or activities without putting any learner in
unnecessary physical or psychological risk/s.(1)
Supervised the learners as they engage in individual/group activities which are potentially risky.
(1)
Reminded learners on the safety standards and practices to be observed in performing the
learning tasks or activities. (0.5)
Took time in discussing the precautionary measures in using/handling/operating potentially
dangerous materials, tools, equipment, or substances used during class (if needed). (2)
Indicator No. 5: Established safe and secure learning environments to enhance learning through the
consistent implementation of policies, guidelines and procedures.
3. DepED – Bacolod City
SY 2021-2022 IPCRF PPST Indicators
Scoring Guide for Classroom Observation
Called learner/s’ attention, whenever needed, to follow safety standards and practices while
performing the learning tasks or activities.(0.5)
Set house rules/guidelines (1)
Performed routinary activities (1)
Presented learning objectives for the day (0.5)
Provided anticipatory activities (0.5)
Observed time-on-task (1)
Provided thinking time in responding to questions (1)
Free from distractions (0.5)
Prepared back-up plan in case of failure of connectivity (1)
Delivered the lesson without using profane language. (1)
Provided learner-friendly support learning materials:
a. video presentation (0.5)
b. audio presentation (0.5)
Checked the attendance (0.5)
Showed strong adherence to the health and safety protocols (1)
The physical learning space:
was arranged in adherence to the IATF, SDRRM & child-friendly school guidelines & policies such
as ensuring the availability of emergency/ First Aid kits, fire extinguishers and proper signage
needed to facilitate and establish safe and secure learning environment (1)
The instructional material/s especially the potentially dangerous materials, tools, and substances
used:
was/were supported with precautionary measures (0.5)
incorporated safety instructions and reminders (0.5)
The psychosocial climate of the learning space was characterized by a/an/the:
general sense of safety and security (1)
*Specific observation notes that do not fall under the sub-indicators but are related to the
indicator or expectation will be given a point equivalent of (1).
To determine the teacher’s score in this indicator, sum up the point equivalents of checked sub-indicators
duly supported by the specific observations captured in the Observation Notes Form. Refer to the table
below for the Classroom Observation Rating corresponding to the total point equivalent of the checked
sub-indicators:
For Proficient:
Total points equivalent of the checked sub-indicators Classroom Observation Rating
12 7
11 6
10 5
9 4
8 3
Indicator No.6. Maintained learning environments that promote fairness, respect and care to encourage
learning.
Gave feedbacks that are free from biases & prejudices (2)
Presented rubrics when necessary (1)
Upheld child protection policy (2)
Promoted gender sensitivity (2)
Provided activities that consider the different factors of learning (2)
Used simple words in presenting ideas (1)
*Specific observation notes that do not fall under the sub-indicators but are related to the
indicator or expectation will be given a point equivalent of (1).
4. DepED – Bacolod City
SY 2021-2022 IPCRF PPST Indicators
Scoring Guide for Classroom Observation
To determine the teacher’s score in this indicator, sum up the point equivalents of checked sub-indicators
duly supported by the specific observations captured in the Observation Notes Form. Refer to the table
below for the Classroom Observation Rating corresponding to the total point equivalent of the checked
sub-indicators:
For Proficient:
Total points equivalent of the checked sub-indicators Classroom Observation Rating
7 7
6 6
5 5
4 4
3 3
Indicator No.7. Maintained learning environments that nurture and inspire learners to participate,
cooperate and collaboration in continued learning.
Encouraged learners’ cooperation in the activities given (2)
Provided learners with activities that develop their sense of participation (2)
Gave learners’ the tasks that promote collaboration (2)
Reminded the learners about their individual/group responsibilities(1)
Promoted differentiated instruction(2)
Used motivational activities (1)
Employed strategies that are related to learners’ positive personal experiences (2)
Absence of harsh & offensive language was evident (2)
*Specific observation notes that do not fall under the sub-indicators but are related to the indicator
or expectation will be given a point equivalent of (1).
To determine the teacher’s score in this indicator, sum up the point equivalents of checked sub-indicators
duly supported by the specific observations captured in the Observation Notes Form. Refer to the table
below for the Classroom Observation Rating corresponding to the total point equivalent of the checked
sub-indicators:
For Proficient:
Total points equivalent of the checked sub-indicators Classroom Observation Rating
9 7
8 6
7 5
6 4
5 3
Indicator No.8. Applied a range of successful strategies that maintain learning environments that
motivate learners to work productively by assuming responsibility for their own learning.
provided a specific, (1)
accurate,(2)
and timely feedback. (1)
Teacher gauged pupils’ level of understanding thru verbal questioning to assess their work.(2)
Guided students in making progress or enhancement of their work based on comments given. (2)
Led students to enable them to respond to the feedback. (1)
*Specific observation notes that do not fall under the sub-indicators but are related to the indicator
or expectation will be given a point equivalent of (1).
To determine the teacher’s score in this indicator, sum up the point equivalents of checked sub-indicators
duly supported by the specific observations captured in the Observation Notes Form. Refer to the table
below for the Classroom Observation Rating corresponding to the total point equivalent of the checked
sub-indicators:
For Proficient:
Total points equivalent of the checked sub-indicators Classroom Observation Rating
6 7
5 6
4 5
3 4
2 3
5. DepED – Bacolod City
SY 2021-2022 IPCRF PPST Indicators
Scoring Guide for Classroom Observation
Indicator No.9 Designed, adapted and implemented teaching strategies that are responsive to learners
with disabilities, giftedness and talents.
Implemented the structured learning episodes or activities that provided learners with the
opportunity/ies to:
o work on a challenging task such as but not limited to problem-based task that requires
multiple skills to complete within the allotted instructional time (1)
o engage in face-to-face interaction for the achievement of learning goals (0.5)
o develop social skills (0.5)
o experience group processes and dynamics (0.5)
o assume individual accountability for the group output or performance (0.5)
o appreciate position interdependence in accomplishing group tasks (0.5)
Grouped leaners purposively in order to promote:
o maximization of individual strengths (0.5)
The physical learning space was:
arranged in a way that promotes:
o face-to-face interactions between and among leaners in a group (0.5)
o mobility of individuals and groups during the performance of a challenging task (0.5)
The instructional material/s used:
effectively supported or enhanced individual strengths of learners (0.5)
purposively provided learners with the appropriate setting to work collaboratively (0.5)
The psychosocial climate of the learning space was characterized by a/an/the:
profound recognition and acceptance of the diversity of learners (1)
o interdependence in terms of complementing each other’s unique qualities (0.5)
*Specific observation notes that do not fall under the sub-indicators but are related to the indicator
or expectation will be given a point equivalent of (1).
To determine the teacher’s score in this indicator, sum up the point equivalents of checked sub-
indicators duly supported by the specific observations captured in the Observation Notes Form.
Refer to the table below for the Classroom Observation Rating corresponding to the total point
equivalent of the checked sub-indicators:
For Proficient:
Total points equivalent of the checked sub-indicators Classroom Observation Rating
5 7
4 6
3 5
2 4
1 3
Indicator No.10. Adopted and Used culturally appropriate teaching strategies to address the needs of
learners from indigenous groups.
Demonstrated profound understanding of the diverse backgrounds of leaners through:
o the display of respect and personal regard for the learners’ diverse backgrounds (1)
o the use of instructional materials that are free from cultural, socio-economic, or religious
biases (1)
o the use of examples and materials that represent the different backgrounds from which
learners come (1)
o the promotion of purposeful examination of concepts and issues from different cultural,
socio-economic, or religious perspectives (1)
o the prompt intervention when learners manifest intolerant and disrespectful behavior
towards each other’s from cultural, socio-economic, or religious backgrounds (1)
o the use of “teachable moments” to address from cultural, socio-economic, or religious
issues (1)
o the reinforcement of learners’ acts of respect for each other’s cultural, socio-economic,
or religious backgrounds (1)
o the use of different ways of encouraging learners’ participation in consideration of their
cultural, socio-economic, or religious backgrounds (1)
6. DepED – Bacolod City
SY 2021-2022 IPCRF PPST Indicators
Scoring Guide for Classroom Observation
*Specific observation notes that do not fall under the sub-indicators but are related to the indicator
or expectation will be given a point equivalent of (1).
To determine the teacher’s score in this indicator, sum up the point equivalents of checked sub-indicators
duly supported by the specific observations captured in the Observation Notes Form. Refer to the table
below for the Classroom Observation Rating corresponding to the total point equivalent of the checked sub-
indicators:
For Proficient:
Total points equivalent of the checked sub-indicators Classroom Observation Rating
6 7
5 6
4 5
3 4
2 3
NON-CLASSROOM OBSERVABLE INDICATORS (NCOI)
Indicator No. 2: Used research-based knowledge and principles of teaching and learning to enhance
professional practice.
Included in the DLP a research-based lesson
Employed proper citation pref. American Psychological Association (APA) in structuring the DLP
Aligned the lesson/activities with the research findings
Ensured the accuracy of data/information that are provided in the lesson
Exhibited systematic way of structuring the DLP
Applied varied strategies, principles and theories of teaching in preparing the DLP
Indicator No.11. Adopted and implemented learning programs that ensure relevance and
responsiveness to the needs of all learners.
Indicator No.12. Utilized assessment data to inform the modification of teaching and learning practices
and programs.
Indicator No.13. Maintained learning environments that are responsive to community context.
Indicator No.14. Reviewed regularly personal teaching practice using existing laws and regulation that
apply to the teaching profession and responsibilities specified in the code of ethics for professional
teachers.
Indicator No.15. Complied with and implemented school policies and procedures consistently to foster
harmonious relationships with learners, parents and other stakeholders.
Indicator No.16. Applied a personal philosophy of teaching that is learner-centered.
Indicator No.17. Adopted practices that uphold the dignity of teaching as a profession by exhibiting
qualities such as caring attitude, respect and integrity.
Indicator No.18. Set professional development goals based on the Philippine Professional Standard for
teachers
Indicator No.19. Performed various related works/activities that contribute to the teaching-learning
process.