Patellar height
assessment in TKA:
a new method.
How does the vertical patella position
influence the TKA outcome?
Jacques Caton
Jean louis Prudhon
Régis Verdier
Lyon - France
INTRODUCTION
Joint reaction forces in flexion
between groove and patella are
modified by patellar height.
“Patella is the engine break of the
knee” J. Caton
Downstairs load bearing is equal to 5
times the body weight
Knee flexion pain?
Background
• Assessment of the patellar height is very
important before and after a total knee
arthroplasty (TKA)
Figgie HE, 3rd, Goldberg VM, Heiple KG, Moller HS, 3rd, Gordon NH. The influence of tibial-
patellofemoral location on function of the knee in patients with the posterior stabilized condylar
knee prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1986;68(7):1035-40.
Koshino T, Ejima M, Okamoto R, Morii T. Gradual low riding of the patella during postoperative
course after total knee arthroplasty in osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis. J Arthroplasty.
1990;5(4):323-7.
Grelsamer RP. (2002) Patella baja after total knee arthroplasty: is it really patella baja? J
Arthroplasty 17: 66-9
Blumensaat
(1938)
Bernageau,
Goutallier
(1984)
Labelle, Laurin
(1977)
Biedert,
Albrecht (2006)
Femoral reference
Patella height measurement methods
Tibial reference
Insall, Salvati
(1971)
Caton,
Deschamps
(1981)
Blackburne,
Peel (1977)
Grelsamer
(1994) (Insall-
Salvati modifié)
Patella height measurement methods
Mixt Femoral Groove and Tibial Marks :
Koschino – Sugimoto
for children only
Chareangholvanich - Narkbunnam
Picard – Saragaglia Leung – Wail
Patella height measurement methods
Origine of the Caton-Deschamps Index
Caton 1st time (1977) Blackburne & Peel (1977) Caton & Deschamps 1981
César
Insall & Salvati, 1971?
Blackburne and Peel, 1977
Why Insall&Salvati and Blackburne&Peel index have not a precise
accuracy?
3 Major Points of our Method :
1. Articular surface measurement
(AP) eliminates patellar
abnormalities (Patella Magna,
Osteophytes etc...)
2. (AT) T mark eliminates tibial or
tibial tuberosity abnormalities
3. Ratio AT/AP eliminates
problems range of motion
(flexion degrees, 10 to 80°)
Caton-Deschamps index
• For TKA patella height measurement is
difficult and no previous described methods
were perfect.
• And even if original Caton&Deschamps index
is one of the most used in TKA, this index is
not very accuracy: why?
Caton-Deschamps index and TKA (2007)
• Original CD
index (AT/AP)
• Modified index
AT’/AP
(J. Caton)
T’
(a) Preoperative CD and mCD index
(b) Postoperative mCD index
Postero-stabiilzed TKA New Wave (groupe lépine - France)
a b
• Patella vertical
height before
and after TKA
• 2007 Hermès PS
Validation of the measurement method
– 30 consecutive TKA implanted from
april 2014 to april 2015
– New Wave postero stabilized rotating
cementless THA (groupe lépine TM)
– 3 different observers :
• on each knee, each observer performed
twice with a minimal interval of 3 weeks
• Five measurements to calculate 3 index
(preoperative CD and mCD pre and post
opérative)
• Overall, 900 values were measured
Statistical analysis
– Data collected on Excel®
– According to :
• Shrout, PE and Fleiss, FL (Psychol Bull 1979)
• Langlois, J and Hamadouche, M. (BJJ 2016)
Repeatibility intra-observer Intraclass correlation and
reproducibility-Inter-observer intraclass correlation coefficient :
Good and very-good results if 0.6< ICC< 0.8
Results
CD
Preoperative
mCD
Postoperative
mCD
JC
ICC 0.59 0.57 0.63
95%CI [0.30-0.78] [0.27-0.77] [0.32-0.81]
JLP
ICC 0.67 0.60 0.75
95%CI [0.41-0.82] [0.31-0.79] [0.54-0.87]
RV
ICC 0.69 0.58 0.68
95%CI [0.44-0.84] [0.28-0.78] [0.43-0.84]
Repeatability -
Intra-observer
Intraclass
Correlation
Coefficient of CD
and mCD patellar
height index
CD
Preoperative
mCD
Postoperative
mCD
ICC 0.64 0.72 0.68
95%CI [0.42-0.80] [0.56-0.84] [0.43-0.83]
Reproducibility -
Inter-observer
Intraclass
Correlation
Coefficient of CD
and mCD patellar
height index
Results
Preoperative and postoperative mCD Index
Globally the height of patella is lower after TKA ( 80 %)
Mean difference between pre and postoperative mCD was 0.19 (12.2%)
• For TKA 3 measurements of patella height are
necessary
• In case of TKA only, it is very important to know
the patella position before TKA by original
Caton&Deschamps (oCD) index to detect more
reliably a true patella infera which can cause
approaches difficulties
• The new modified index (mCD) is a relative
assessment to compare patella height before TKA
and after TKA: Is vertical patella position be
modified by TKA? What are consequences?
67 y.o. female
Severe overweight
Charnley C
Function score 25
Knee score 8
ROM 0/120
How does the vertical
patella position influence
the TKA outcome?
Material method
– 60 consecutive TKA implanted
from april 2014 to april 2015
– New Wave postero stabilized
rotating cementless THA
(groupe lépine TM)
– One senior surgeon
Material method
– Patella replacement in all cases
– Domical shape
– full Poly Cemented component
– Data collected on file maker Pro
– Modified Caton-Deschamps
index: 4 evaluators (validated
method by intra and inter-
obervers Intraclass correlation
coefficient)
29 females, 31 males
Age: 70.5 (53-86)
Status
Aetiology
Surgical approach 0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Medial OA
lateral OA
Tri comp OA
Ligament injury
post traumatic
Rhumatoid A
PF OA
Tibial osteotomy
TT transfer
other
72%
21%
2%
5%
Antero medial
antero lateral
partial ATT osteotomy
ATT osteotomy
0
5
10
15
20
25
normal mild
obesity
severe
obesity
morbid
obesity
Material method
– IKS Score: (knee
+function) pre
and post op
– ROM: pre and
post op
– Original Caton
Deschamps
index pre op
– Modified Caton
Index: pre and
post op
Material method
results
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
AxisTitle
modified Index pre op vs post op
Pre op mean modified index : 1.32
Post op mean modified index: 1.13
Globally the height of patella is lower after TKA 14.39% in
81.66 % cases
results
Modified patellar height and knee function
Group 1 : major patella lowering more than 0,19 20 cases
Group 2 : medium patella lowering from 0 to 0,19 29 cases
Group 3 : normal or rising higher than 0 11 cases
group 1 group 2 group 3 p value
n = 20 29 11
IKS knee 93.4 92.7 92.00 0.91
IKS function 86.5 89 89 0.80
Lag of
extension
0.44 0.1 1.36 0.03
Max. flexion 128.5 128.4 127.3
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
AxisTitle
«right in the target »
Focus on some results…
AP 1.9
AT° 2.1
Index modifié 1.1
AP 2.2
AT° 2.4
INDEX 1.1
Pre op
IKS knee 15
IKS
function
20
ROM 0/120
Post op
IKS knee 82
IKS function 75
ROM 3/120
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
AxisTitle
« poor shot »
Focus on some results…
AP 1.9
AT° 3.2
Index
modifié
1.7
AP 2.4
AT° 2.5
INDEX 1,05
Pre op
IKS knee 49
IKS function 60
ROM 0/120
Post op
IKS knee 60
IKS function 62
ROM 5/120
Discussion: further questions to
answer
• Patella infera or pseudo patella infera?
– Patella tendon shortening
– Proximal joint line elevation
• Incidence on knee function ?
Correlations between IKS, ROM and joint line
• How to prevent it ?
• Work is on process …
J Arthroplasty. 2002 Jan;17(1):66-9.
Patella baja after total knee arthroplasty: is it really patella baja?
Grelsamer RP.
Surg Technol Int. 2004;12:231-8.
Patella baja and total knee arthroplasty (TKA): etiology, diagnosis, and
management.
Chonko DJ, Lombardi AV Jr, Berend KR.
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015 Dec;23(12):3601-6. doi:
10.1007/s00167-014-3257-1. Epub 2014 Sep 2.
Prevention of pseudo-patella baja during total knee arthroplasty.
Seo JG, Moon YW, Kim SM, Park SH, Lee BH, Chang MJ1, Jo BC.
Discussion - References
International orthopaedics 2016 DOI 10.1007/s00264-016-3256-6
Patellar height assesment in total knee arthroplasty:a new method
Caton JH, Prudhon JL, Aslanian T, Verdier R
• True patella infera is detected most reliably by the original CATON-
DESCHAMPS (CD) (AT/AP) index before TKA, whereas a pseudo
patella infera can be detected only by the mCD index pre- and post-
TKA.
• These results could be also compared to functional results of the
TKA, with potential limitation of motion and potential pain in case of
true postoperative patella infera with extensor mechanism lesions.
• In case of pseudo patella infera with a normal length of the patellar
tendon, the problem is probably secondary to the femoral and tibial
cuts.
• Is it a mild raising of the joint line or a major raising with a significant
knee mechanic problem?
Discussion: further questions to
answer
 Is it a mild raising of the joint line or a major raising with a significant knee mechanic
problem?
 If lowering patella is moderate (<14%) we have not observed functional consequences
 If patella is higher after TKA, results are not so very good
 Need for future evaluations … Work in progress
Conclusion
Preoperative Postoperative
Thank you for your attention

2017-028

  • 1.
    Patellar height assessment inTKA: a new method. How does the vertical patella position influence the TKA outcome? Jacques Caton Jean louis Prudhon Régis Verdier Lyon - France
  • 2.
    INTRODUCTION Joint reaction forcesin flexion between groove and patella are modified by patellar height. “Patella is the engine break of the knee” J. Caton Downstairs load bearing is equal to 5 times the body weight Knee flexion pain?
  • 3.
    Background • Assessment ofthe patellar height is very important before and after a total knee arthroplasty (TKA) Figgie HE, 3rd, Goldberg VM, Heiple KG, Moller HS, 3rd, Gordon NH. The influence of tibial- patellofemoral location on function of the knee in patients with the posterior stabilized condylar knee prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1986;68(7):1035-40. Koshino T, Ejima M, Okamoto R, Morii T. Gradual low riding of the patella during postoperative course after total knee arthroplasty in osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis. J Arthroplasty. 1990;5(4):323-7. Grelsamer RP. (2002) Patella baja after total knee arthroplasty: is it really patella baja? J Arthroplasty 17: 66-9
  • 4.
  • 5.
    Tibial reference Insall, Salvati (1971) Caton, Deschamps (1981) Blackburne, Peel(1977) Grelsamer (1994) (Insall- Salvati modifié) Patella height measurement methods
  • 6.
    Mixt Femoral Grooveand Tibial Marks : Koschino – Sugimoto for children only Chareangholvanich - Narkbunnam Picard – Saragaglia Leung – Wail Patella height measurement methods
  • 7.
    Origine of theCaton-Deschamps Index Caton 1st time (1977) Blackburne & Peel (1977) Caton & Deschamps 1981 César
  • 8.
    Insall & Salvati,1971? Blackburne and Peel, 1977 Why Insall&Salvati and Blackburne&Peel index have not a precise accuracy?
  • 9.
    3 Major Pointsof our Method : 1. Articular surface measurement (AP) eliminates patellar abnormalities (Patella Magna, Osteophytes etc...) 2. (AT) T mark eliminates tibial or tibial tuberosity abnormalities 3. Ratio AT/AP eliminates problems range of motion (flexion degrees, 10 to 80°) Caton-Deschamps index
  • 10.
    • For TKApatella height measurement is difficult and no previous described methods were perfect. • And even if original Caton&Deschamps index is one of the most used in TKA, this index is not very accuracy: why?
  • 11.
    Caton-Deschamps index andTKA (2007) • Original CD index (AT/AP) • Modified index AT’/AP (J. Caton) T’
  • 12.
    (a) Preoperative CDand mCD index (b) Postoperative mCD index Postero-stabiilzed TKA New Wave (groupe lépine - France) a b
  • 14.
    • Patella vertical heightbefore and after TKA • 2007 Hermès PS
  • 15.
    Validation of themeasurement method – 30 consecutive TKA implanted from april 2014 to april 2015 – New Wave postero stabilized rotating cementless THA (groupe lépine TM) – 3 different observers : • on each knee, each observer performed twice with a minimal interval of 3 weeks • Five measurements to calculate 3 index (preoperative CD and mCD pre and post opérative) • Overall, 900 values were measured
  • 16.
    Statistical analysis – Datacollected on Excel® – According to : • Shrout, PE and Fleiss, FL (Psychol Bull 1979) • Langlois, J and Hamadouche, M. (BJJ 2016) Repeatibility intra-observer Intraclass correlation and reproducibility-Inter-observer intraclass correlation coefficient : Good and very-good results if 0.6< ICC< 0.8
  • 17.
    Results CD Preoperative mCD Postoperative mCD JC ICC 0.59 0.570.63 95%CI [0.30-0.78] [0.27-0.77] [0.32-0.81] JLP ICC 0.67 0.60 0.75 95%CI [0.41-0.82] [0.31-0.79] [0.54-0.87] RV ICC 0.69 0.58 0.68 95%CI [0.44-0.84] [0.28-0.78] [0.43-0.84] Repeatability - Intra-observer Intraclass Correlation Coefficient of CD and mCD patellar height index CD Preoperative mCD Postoperative mCD ICC 0.64 0.72 0.68 95%CI [0.42-0.80] [0.56-0.84] [0.43-0.83] Reproducibility - Inter-observer Intraclass Correlation Coefficient of CD and mCD patellar height index
  • 18.
    Results Preoperative and postoperativemCD Index Globally the height of patella is lower after TKA ( 80 %) Mean difference between pre and postoperative mCD was 0.19 (12.2%)
  • 19.
    • For TKA3 measurements of patella height are necessary • In case of TKA only, it is very important to know the patella position before TKA by original Caton&Deschamps (oCD) index to detect more reliably a true patella infera which can cause approaches difficulties • The new modified index (mCD) is a relative assessment to compare patella height before TKA and after TKA: Is vertical patella position be modified by TKA? What are consequences?
  • 20.
    67 y.o. female Severeoverweight Charnley C Function score 25 Knee score 8 ROM 0/120
  • 22.
    How does thevertical patella position influence the TKA outcome?
  • 23.
    Material method – 60consecutive TKA implanted from april 2014 to april 2015 – New Wave postero stabilized rotating cementless THA (groupe lépine TM) – One senior surgeon
  • 24.
    Material method – Patellareplacement in all cases – Domical shape – full Poly Cemented component – Data collected on file maker Pro – Modified Caton-Deschamps index: 4 evaluators (validated method by intra and inter- obervers Intraclass correlation coefficient)
  • 25.
    29 females, 31males Age: 70.5 (53-86) Status Aetiology Surgical approach 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 Medial OA lateral OA Tri comp OA Ligament injury post traumatic Rhumatoid A PF OA Tibial osteotomy TT transfer other 72% 21% 2% 5% Antero medial antero lateral partial ATT osteotomy ATT osteotomy 0 5 10 15 20 25 normal mild obesity severe obesity morbid obesity Material method
  • 26.
    – IKS Score:(knee +function) pre and post op – ROM: pre and post op – Original Caton Deschamps index pre op – Modified Caton Index: pre and post op Material method
  • 28.
    results 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2 1 2 34 5 6 7 8 9 101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960 AxisTitle modified Index pre op vs post op Pre op mean modified index : 1.32 Post op mean modified index: 1.13 Globally the height of patella is lower after TKA 14.39% in 81.66 % cases
  • 29.
    results Modified patellar heightand knee function Group 1 : major patella lowering more than 0,19 20 cases Group 2 : medium patella lowering from 0 to 0,19 29 cases Group 3 : normal or rising higher than 0 11 cases group 1 group 2 group 3 p value n = 20 29 11 IKS knee 93.4 92.7 92.00 0.91 IKS function 86.5 89 89 0.80 Lag of extension 0.44 0.1 1.36 0.03 Max. flexion 128.5 128.4 127.3
  • 30.
    0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2 1 2 34 5 6 7 8 9 101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960 AxisTitle «right in the target » Focus on some results…
  • 31.
    AP 1.9 AT° 2.1 Indexmodifié 1.1 AP 2.2 AT° 2.4 INDEX 1.1 Pre op IKS knee 15 IKS function 20 ROM 0/120 Post op IKS knee 82 IKS function 75 ROM 3/120
  • 32.
    0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2 1 2 34 5 6 7 8 9 101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960 AxisTitle « poor shot » Focus on some results…
  • 33.
    AP 1.9 AT° 3.2 Index modifié 1.7 AP2.4 AT° 2.5 INDEX 1,05 Pre op IKS knee 49 IKS function 60 ROM 0/120 Post op IKS knee 60 IKS function 62 ROM 5/120
  • 34.
    Discussion: further questionsto answer • Patella infera or pseudo patella infera? – Patella tendon shortening – Proximal joint line elevation • Incidence on knee function ? Correlations between IKS, ROM and joint line • How to prevent it ? • Work is on process …
  • 35.
    J Arthroplasty. 2002Jan;17(1):66-9. Patella baja after total knee arthroplasty: is it really patella baja? Grelsamer RP. Surg Technol Int. 2004;12:231-8. Patella baja and total knee arthroplasty (TKA): etiology, diagnosis, and management. Chonko DJ, Lombardi AV Jr, Berend KR. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015 Dec;23(12):3601-6. doi: 10.1007/s00167-014-3257-1. Epub 2014 Sep 2. Prevention of pseudo-patella baja during total knee arthroplasty. Seo JG, Moon YW, Kim SM, Park SH, Lee BH, Chang MJ1, Jo BC. Discussion - References International orthopaedics 2016 DOI 10.1007/s00264-016-3256-6 Patellar height assesment in total knee arthroplasty:a new method Caton JH, Prudhon JL, Aslanian T, Verdier R
  • 36.
    • True patellainfera is detected most reliably by the original CATON- DESCHAMPS (CD) (AT/AP) index before TKA, whereas a pseudo patella infera can be detected only by the mCD index pre- and post- TKA. • These results could be also compared to functional results of the TKA, with potential limitation of motion and potential pain in case of true postoperative patella infera with extensor mechanism lesions. • In case of pseudo patella infera with a normal length of the patellar tendon, the problem is probably secondary to the femoral and tibial cuts. • Is it a mild raising of the joint line or a major raising with a significant knee mechanic problem? Discussion: further questions to answer
  • 37.
     Is ita mild raising of the joint line or a major raising with a significant knee mechanic problem?  If lowering patella is moderate (<14%) we have not observed functional consequences  If patella is higher after TKA, results are not so very good  Need for future evaluations … Work in progress Conclusion Preoperative Postoperative
  • 38.
    Thank you foryour attention