SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 53
Download to read offline
- 1 -
Pieter Beurskens
PhD Researcher - University of Twente
“Development of a Reuse Potential tool”
Date 30 November 2016
Erasmus MC building H, HE & HS
(2005)
(2005)
(1958)
- 2 -
Content
1. 		 Introduction reuse potential
2.1 	 Introduction Building He, Hs
2.2 	 Examine Reuse potential - Building Hs
3.1 	 Introduction Building H (Dijkzicht)
3.2 	 Examine reuse potential - Facade building H
4. 		 Workshop
- 3 -
Reuse potential
TRANSFORMATION
CAPACITY
REUSEPOTENTIAL
Identification of
•	 Economic impact
•	 Environmental impact Integration RP tool in BIM
Durmisevic, 2006
- 4 -
Erasmus building He, Hs (2005)
Erasmus building He, Hs,
Rotterdam, Netherlands
- 5 -
Erasmus building He, Hs (2005)
Erasmus building He, Hs,
Rotterdam, Netherlands
1st
2nd
3rd
4th
5th
6th
-1st
He
Hs
- 6 -
Erasmus building He, Hs,
Rotterdam, Netherlands
Erasmus building He, Hs (2005)
1st
2nd
3rd
4th
5th
6th
-1st
Hs
He
- 7 -
Erasmus building Hs (2005)
toilet
group
installations
stairs
lift
stairs
Legend
structure
wind brace
floor plan - 4th floor
- 8 -
toilet
group
installations
stairs
lift
stairs
Legend
structure
wind brace
facade
floor plan - 4th floor
Erasmus building Hs (2005)
6m
- 9 -
Legend
+++
structure
wind brace
water supply
water drainage
heating
Erasmus building Hs (2005)
- 10 -
Erasmus building Hs (2005)
Legend
structure
wind brace
cable tray
(electra + data)
cable gutter
- 11 -
Erasmus building Hs (2005)
Legend
structure
wind brace
air supply
return air
- 12 -
+++
Legend
structure
wind brace
water supply
water drainage
heating
cable tray
(electra + data)
cable gutter
air supply
return air
Erasmus building Hs (2005)
- 13 -
Examine reuse potential - Building Hs
- 14 -
Examine reuse potential - Building Hs
TRANSFORMATION
CAPACITY
REUSEPOTENTIAL
Durmisevic, 2006
- 15 -
Examine reuse potential - Building Hs
Transformable Building StructuresChapter 5
choose demolition instead of disassembly. This brings into focus two-stage
assembly and disassembly. First, at the building site, where higher-level sub-
assemblies like systems and components are replaced for reuse/reconfiguration,
and secondly in the factory, where lower levels subassemblies, such as sub-
components and elements, are disassembled and replaced for reuse/
reconfiguration/recycling.
Figure 5.09 shows four types of building configuration distinguished by the number
of on-site assembly/disassembly operations. The problem of coordination between
different components and their assembly/disassembly operations grows along
this systematization from 1 to 4.
For example, a façade system can be structured following the pattern of functional
decomposition, into sub-functions such as: enclosing, finishing, isolating, water
protecting, and load bearing. Sub-functions can be allocated through independent
elements arranged into components, to form a particular façade system (Figure
5.10 right). These components are materialisations of sub-functions. In this way,
the façade system is composed of components that can have different use and
technical life cycles. This makes the façade system flexible, because it can be
easily modified, according to new requirements regarding light, insulation, position
of openings, etc. At the same time, components can be reused in other situations,
reconfigured or recycled. Development of such systems takes into account both
	 structure and material levels
choose demolition instead of disassembly. This brings into focus two-stage
assembly and disassembly. First, at the building site, where higher-level sub-
assemblies like systems and components are replaced for reuse/reconfiguration,
and secondly in the factory, where lower levels subassemblies, such as sub-
components and elements, are disassembled and replaced for reuse/
reconfiguration/recycling.
Figure 5.09 shows four types of building configuration distinguished by the number
of on-site assembly/disassembly operations. The problem of coordination between
different components and their assembly/disassembly operations grows along
this systematization from 1 to 4.
For example, a façade system can be structured following the pattern of functional
decomposition, into sub-functions such as: enclosing, finishing, isolating, water
protecting, and load bearing. Sub-functions can be allocated through independent
elements arranged into components, to form a particular façade system (Figure
5.10 right). These components are materialisations of sub-functions. In this way,
the façade system is composed of components that can have different use and
technical life cycles. This makes the façade system flexible, because it can be
easily modified, according to new requirements regarding light, insulation, position
of openings, etc. At the same time, components can be reused in other situations,
reconfigured or recycled. Development of such systems takes into account both
short-term strategies related to adaptation for future use, and a long-term strategy
related to the most beneficial end-of-life building component scenario. Houwever,
if there is no clustering with respect to systems sub-functions than most of systems
sub-functions are integrated into one composite component. Figure 5.10 left
illustrates such a system, where the load-bearing functions, light openings, and
subdivision of openings are combined into one material level. This system has
been developed for construction of a number of housing towers in Hong Kong.
Such a system structuring lacks transformational capacity and cannot be adapted
to different use requirements. At the end of a system’s service life, the only end-of-
life scenario is demolition and down-cycling of material.
Figure 5.09: Four types of building
configuration distinguished by the
number of on-site assembly/disassembly
operations.
choose demolition instead of disassembly. This brings into focus two-stage
assembly and disassembly. First, at the building site, where higher-level sub-
assemblies like systems and components are replaced for reuse/reconfiguration,
and secondly in the factory, where lower levels subassemblies, such as sub-
components and elements, are disassembled and replaced for reuse/
reconfiguration/recycling.
Figure 5.09 shows four types of building configuration distinguished by the number
of on-site assembly/disassembly operations. The problem of coordination between
different components and their assembly/disassembly operations grows along
this systematization from 1 to 4.
For example, a façade system can be structured following the pattern of functional
decomposition, into sub-functions such as: enclosing, finishing, isolating, water
protecting, and load bearing. Sub-functions can be allocated through independent
elements arranged into components, to form a particular façade system (Figure
5.10 right). These components are materialisations of sub-functions. In this way,
the façade system is composed of components that can have different use and
technical life cycles. This makes the façade system flexible, because it can be
easily modified, according to new requirements regarding light, insulation, position
of openings, etc. At the same time, components can be reused in other situations,
reconfigured or recycled. Development of such systems takes into account both
short-term strategies related to adaptation for future use, and a long-term strategy
related to the most beneficial end-of-life building component scenario. Houwever,
if there is no clustering with respect to systems sub-functions than most of systems
sub-functions are integrated into one composite component. Figure 5.10 left
illustrates such a system, where the load-bearing functions, light openings, and
subdivision of openings are combined into one material level. This system has
been developed for construction of a number of housing towers in Hong Kong.
Such a system structuring lacks transformational capacity and cannot be adapted
to different use requirements. At the end of a system’s service life, the only end-of-
life scenario is demolition and down-cycling of material.
Figure 5.09: Four types of building
configuration distinguished by the
number of on-site assembly/disassembly
operations.
Transformable Building StructuresChapter 5
choose demolition instead of disassembly. This brings into focus two-stage
assembly and disassembly. First, at the building site, where higher-level sub-
assemblies like systems and components are replaced for reuse/reconfiguration,
and secondly in the factory, where lower levels subassemblies, such as sub-
components and elements, are disassembled and replaced for reuse/
reconfiguration/recycling.
Figure 5.09 shows four types of building configuration distinguished by the number
of on-site assembly/disassembly operations. The problem of coordination between
different components and their assembly/disassembly operations grows along
this systematization from 1 to 4.
For example, a façade system can be structured following the pattern of functional
decomposition, into sub-functions such as: enclosing, finishing, isolating, water
protecting, and load bearing. Sub-functions can be allocated through independent
elements arranged into components, to form a particular façade system (Figure
5.10 right). These components are materialisations of sub-functions. In this way,
the façade system is composed of components that can have different use and
technical life cycles. This makes the façade system flexible, because it can be
easily modified, according to new requirements regarding light, insulation, position
of openings, etc. At the same time, components can be reused in other situations,
reconfigured or recycled. Development of such systems takes into account both
Assessment
1. components					1,0
2. elements/ components				0,8
3. elements						0,6
4. material/ element/ component			 0,4
5. material/ element					0,2
6. material						0,1
installations
Floor level
+ 2700
installations
- 16 -
Examine reuse potential - Building Hs
Load bearing	 5. material/ element		 0,2
Enclosure		 2. elements/ components	 0,8
Infill			 3. elements				0,6
Service		3. element 				0,6
	 structure and material levels
Assessment
1. components					1,0
2. elements/ components				0,8
3. elements						0,6
4. material/ element/ component			 0,4
5. material/ element					0,2
6. material						0,1
installations
Floor level
+ 2700
installations
1.00
St Co
+2.10
3.01
M St
3.02
Pl fi
Infill
3.04
LCF
3.05
LCP
elements
3.02
I Insu
Service
4.03
S HD
4.04
S VD
4.06
S WD
4.01
S CD
4.02
Ca G
4.04
Radtr
elements
1.01
St Be
1.05
Pr Bo
1.06
Co St
Load
bearing
1.04
St Fi
elements
materials
1.03
An Fl
1.03
IC Fl
1.02
Co Fl
1.00
St Co
2.10
La FF
2.13
SFF
2.11
Wi Fr
2.14
Ex Fi
2.12
In Fi
2.00
La FF
2.03
SFF
2.01
Wi Fr
2.04
Ex Fi
2.02
In Fi
2.06
Ex Fi
+2.00
La FF
-2.03
SFF
+2.10
La FF
-2.13
SFF
3.01
M St
3.02
Pl fi
2.15
So Sh
Infill
Enclosure
3.04
LCF
3.05
LCP
sub-systems
components
elements
elements
3.02
I Insu
Service
4.03
S HD
4.04
S VD
4.06
S WD
4.01
S CD
4.02
Ca G
4.04
Radtr
elements
2.05
So Sh
1.01
St Be
1.05
Pr Bo
1.06
Co St
Load
bearing
1.04
St Fi
elements
materials
1.03
An Fl
1.03
IC Fl
1.02
Co Fl
1.00
St Co
2.10
La FF
2.13
SFF
2.11
Wi Fr
2.14
Ex Fi
2.12
In Fi
2.00
La FF
2.03
SFF
2.01
Wi Fr
2.04
Ex Fi
2.02
In Fi
2.06
Ex Fi
+2.00
La FF
-2.03
SFF
+2.10
La FF
-2.13
SFF
3.01
M St
3.02
Pl fi
2.15
So Sh
Infill
Enclosure
3.04
LCF
3.05
LCP
sub-systems
components
elements
elements
3.02
I Insu
Service
4.03
S HD
4.04
S VD
4.06
S WD
4.01
S CD
4.02
Ca G
4.04
Radtr
elements
2.05
So Sh
1.01
St Be
1.05
Pr Bo
1.06
Co St
Load
bearing
1.04
St Fi
elements
materials
1.03
An Fl
1.03
IC Fl
1.02
Co Fl
2.10
La FF
2.13
SFF
2.11
Wi Fr
2.14
Ex Fi
2.12
In Fi
2.00
La FF
2.03
SFF
2.01
Wi Fr
2.04
Ex Fi
2.02
In Fi
2.06
Ex Fi
+2.00
La FF
-2.03
SFF
+2.10
La FF
-2.13
SFF
3.01
M St
3.02
Pl fi
2.15
So Sh
Infill
Enclosure
3.04
LCF
3.05
LCP
sub-systems
components
elements
elements
3.02
I Insu
Service
4.03
S HD
4.04
S VD
4.06
S WD
4.01
S CD
4.02
Ca G
4.04
Radtr
elements
2.05
So Sh
Co St
materials
1.03
An Fl
1.03
IC Fl
- 17 -
	 relational pattern
Assessment
1. vertical						1,0
2. horizontal in lower zone at the diagram		 0,6
3. horizontal between upper and lower zone		 0,4
4. horizontal in upper zone				 0,1
Examine reuse potential - Building Hs
Transformable Building Structures
Horizontal relations in Figure 5.1
wall, electrical installation, and
surrounding elements would be
vertical relational diagram that
wall systems, which have a gre
5.3.3 Base element specifica
Figure 5.15: type of configuration as
result of the position of relations
between the functional groups.
Horizontal relations are common in static
configurations, vertical relations are
common in dynamic configurations. The
figure represents static, partly dynamic
and dynamic configurations of three wall
systems.
Functional decomposition
Teschnicladecomposition
Fun
A B
Transformable Building Structures Chapter 5
Horizontal relations in Figure 5.15 Aillustrate dependencies between the separation
wall, electrical installation, and finishing. If one element needs to be replaced, all
surrounding elements would be damaged. Figure 5.15 B and C illustrate more
vertical relational diagram that represents a partially open and open hierarchy of
wall systems, which have a greater transformational capacity.
5.3.3 Base element specification
Figure 5.15: type of configuration as
result of the position of relations
between the functional groups.
Horizontal relations are common in static
configurations, vertical relations are
common in dynamic configurations. The
figure represents static, partly dynamic
and dynamic configurations of three wall
systems.
Functional decomposition
Teschnicladecomposition
Functional decomposition Functional decomposition
A B C
Transformable Building Structures Chapter 5
Horizontal relations in Figure 5.15 Aillustrate dependencies between the separation
wall, electrical installation, and finishing. If one element needs to be replaced, all
surrounding elements would be damaged. Figure 5.15 B and C illustrate more
vertical relational diagram that represents a partially open and open hierarchy of
wall systems, which have a greater transformational capacity.
5.3.3 Base element specification
Figure 5.15: type of configuration as
result of the position of relations
between the functional groups.
Horizontal relations are common in static
configurations, vertical relations are
common in dynamic configurations. The
figure represents static, partly dynamic
and dynamic configurations of three wall
systems.
Functional decomposition
Teschnicladecomposition
Functional decomposition Functional decomposition
A B C
4.3.1.
installations
Floor level
+ 2700
installations
Functional decomposition
Technicaldecomposition
Functional decomposition
Technicaldecomposition
Functional decomposition
Technicaldecomposition
- 18 -
installations
Floor level
+ 2700
installations
	 relational pattern
Examine reuse potential - Building Hs
1.00
St Co
1.01
St Be
1.05
Pr Bo
2.10
La FF
2.13
SFF
2.11
Wi Fr
2.14
Ex Fi
2.12
In Fi
2.00
La FF
2.03
SFF
2.01
Wi Fr
2.04
Ex Fi
2.02
In Fi
2.06
Ex Fi
+2.00
La FF
-2.03
SFF
+2.10
La FF
-2.13
SFF
1.06
Co St
3.01
M St
3.02
Pl fi
2.15
So Sh
Infill
Enclosure
Load
bearing
3.04
LCF
3.05
LCP
sub-systems
components
elements
elements
3.02
I Insu
Service
4.03
S HD
4.04
S VD
4.06
S WD
4.01
S CD
4.02
Ca G
4.04
Radtr
elements
2.05
So Sh
elements
materials
1.03
An Fl
1.03
IC Fl
1.02
Co Fl
vertical connections
horizontal connections
Type of connection
1.04
St Fi
	 building level	 0,4
Assessment
1. vertical						1,0
2. horizontal in lower zone at the diagram		 0,6
3. horizontal between upper and lower zone		 0,4
4. horizontal in upper zone				 0,1
1.01
St Be
2.10
La FF
2.13
SFF
2.11
Wi Fr
2.14
Ex Fi
2.12
In Fi
2.00
La FF
2.03
SFF
2.01
Wi Fr
2.04
Ex Fi
2.02
In Fi
2.06
Ex Fi
+2.00
La FF
-2.03
SFF
+2.10
La FF
-2.13
SFF
3.01
M St
3.02
Pl fi
2.15
So Sh
Infill
Enclosure
3.04
LCF
3.05
LCP
sub-systems
components
elements
elements
3.02
I Insu
2.05
So Sh
elements
materials
1.03
An Fl
1.03
IC Fl
1.02
Co Fl
vertical connections
horizontal connections
Type of connection
1.04
St Fi
- 19 -
installations
Floor level
+ 2700
installations
	 relational pattern
Assessment
1. vertical						1,0
2. horizontal in lower zone at the diagram		 0,6
3. horizontal between upper and lower zone		 0,4
4. horizontal in upper zone				 0,1
Examine reuse potential - Building Hs
	 system level
	 1.00
St Co
3.01
M St
Infill
3.04
LCF
elements
Service
4.03
S HD
4.04
S VD
4.06
S WD
4.01
S CD
4.02
elements
1.01
St Be
1.05
Pr Bo
1.06
Co St
Load
bearing
1.04
St Fi
elements
materials
1.03
An Fl
1.03
IC Fl
1.02
Co Fl
2.10
La FF
2.13
SFF
2.11
Wi Fr
2.14
Ex Fi
2.12
In Fi
2.00
La FF
2.03
SFF
2.01
Wi Fr
2.04
Ex Fi
2.02
In Fi
2.06
Ex Fi
+2.00
La FF
-2.03
SFF
+2.10
La FF
-2.13
SFF
2.15
So Sh
Enclosure
sub-systems
components
elements
elements
3
I
2.05
So Sh
Load bearing	 3. horizontal between upper and lower zone	0,4
Enclosure		 2. horizontal in lower zone at the diagram	 0,6
1.01
St Be
2.10
La FF
2.13
SFF
2.11
Wi Fr
2.14
Ex Fi
2.12
In Fi
2.00
La FF
2.03
SFF
2.01
Wi Fr
2.04
Ex Fi
2.02
In Fi
2.06
Ex Fi
+2.00
La FF
-2.03
SFF
+2.10
La FF
-2.13
SFF
3.01
M St
3.02
Pl fi
2.15
So Sh
Infill
Enclosure
3.04
LCF
3.05
LCP
sub-systems
components
elements
elements
3.02
I Insu
2.05
So Sh
elements
materials
1.03
An Fl
1.03
IC Fl
1.02
Co Fl
vertical connections
horizontal connections
Type of connection
1.04
St Fi
- 20 -
Examine reuse potential - Building Hs
	 base element specification
Assessment
1. base element - intermediary between systems/compo-
nents							1,0
2. base element on two levels 			 0,6
3. element with two functions (base element + function) 	
							0,4
4. no base element					0,1
176
TraChapter 5
Figure 5.16 shows four principles of defining the façade and the role that
specification of a base element can have on decomposition of a façade element.
Principle 1 in Figure 5.16 is based on the assumption that building parts are
assembled on site. In this principle, elements, which according to their functionality
belong to the functional assembly of the façade (f1), have direct relations with
other functional assemblies (load-bearing construction) (f2). Column (a) has the
function of the base element for all elements in assembly, and therefore has
connections with them all.
In principle 2, two functions (f1, f2) are clustered into one component. The wooden
frame (b) is the base element for the façade assembly, and at the same time has
a load bearing function in the building. This makes the construction process
simpler, however, change of one façade panel would have consequences for the
stability of the total structure.
Principle 3 shows an independent assembly of two independent functions (f1, f2).
Elements assembled as façade (b, b1, b2, b3) are clustered into one component,
where the wooden frame (b) is chosen as the base element. The load-bearing
function (a) is taken out and defined as an independent assembly. In this case,
the load bearing elements act as a frame for the whole building and the wooden
frame b is the base for the façade assembly. This serves as an intermediary
between the load bearing assembly and independent elements of the façade.
installations
Floor level
+ 2700
installations
1.00
St Co
3.01
M St
Infill
3.04
LCF
Service
4.04
S VD
4.06
S WD
4.01
1.01
St Be
1.05
Pr Bo
1.06
Co St
Load
bearing
elements
materials
1.03
An Fl
1.03
IC Fl
1.02
Co Fl
1.02
Co Fl
1.04
St Fi
Building level
Load bearing	 1. base element	 B-level	 1,0
- 21 -
Examine reuse potential - Building Hs
	 base element specification
Assessment
1. base element - intermediary between systems/compo-
nents							1,0
2. base element on two levels 			 0,6
3. element with two functions (base element + function) 	
							0,4
4. no base element					0,1
176
TraChapter 5
Figure 5.16 shows four principles of defining the façade and the role that
specification of a base element can have on decomposition of a façade element.
Principle 1 in Figure 5.16 is based on the assumption that building parts are
assembled on site. In this principle, elements, which according to their functionality
belong to the functional assembly of the façade (f1), have direct relations with
other functional assemblies (load-bearing construction) (f2). Column (a) has the
function of the base element for all elements in assembly, and therefore has
connections with them all.
In principle 2, two functions (f1, f2) are clustered into one component. The wooden
frame (b) is the base element for the façade assembly, and at the same time has
a load bearing function in the building. This makes the construction process
simpler, however, change of one façade panel would have consequences for the
stability of the total structure.
Principle 3 shows an independent assembly of two independent functions (f1, f2).
Elements assembled as façade (b, b1, b2, b3) are clustered into one component,
where the wooden frame (b) is chosen as the base element. The load-bearing
function (a) is taken out and defined as an independent assembly. In this case,
the load bearing elements act as a frame for the whole building and the wooden
frame b is the base for the façade assembly. This serves as an intermediary
between the load bearing assembly and independent elements of the façade.
installations
Floor level
+ 2700
installations
2.10
La FF
2.13
SFF
2.11
Wi Fr
2.14
Ex Fi
2.12
In Fi
2.00
La FF
2.03
SFF
2.01
Wi Fr
2.04
Ex Fi
2.02
In Fi
2.06
Ex Fi
+2.00
La FF
-2.03
SFF
+2.10
La FF
-2.13
SFF
3.01
M St
3.02
Pl fi
2.15
So Sh
Infill
Enclosure
3.04
LCF
3.05
LCP
sub-systems
components
elements
elements
3.02
I Insu
Service
4.0
S H
4.04
S VD
4.06
S WD
4.01
S CD
4.02
Ca G
4.0
Rad
elements
2.05
So Sh
system level
Load bearing	 1. base element	 B-level	 1,0
Enclosure		 1. base element	 S-level	 1,0
- 22 -
Examine reuse potential - Building Hs
	 base element specification
Assessment
1. base element - intermediary between systems/compo-
nents							1,0
2. base element on two levels 			 0,6
3. element with two functions (base element + function) 	
							0,4
4. no base element					0,1
176
TraChapter 5
Figure 5.16 shows four principles of defining the façade and the role that
specification of a base element can have on decomposition of a façade element.
Principle 1 in Figure 5.16 is based on the assumption that building parts are
assembled on site. In this principle, elements, which according to their functionality
belong to the functional assembly of the façade (f1), have direct relations with
other functional assemblies (load-bearing construction) (f2). Column (a) has the
function of the base element for all elements in assembly, and therefore has
connections with them all.
In principle 2, two functions (f1, f2) are clustered into one component. The wooden
frame (b) is the base element for the façade assembly, and at the same time has
a load bearing function in the building. This makes the construction process
simpler, however, change of one façade panel would have consequences for the
stability of the total structure.
Principle 3 shows an independent assembly of two independent functions (f1, f2).
Elements assembled as façade (b, b1, b2, b3) are clustered into one component,
where the wooden frame (b) is chosen as the base element. The load-bearing
function (a) is taken out and defined as an independent assembly. In this case,
the load bearing elements act as a frame for the whole building and the wooden
frame b is the base for the façade assembly. This serves as an intermediary
between the load bearing assembly and independent elements of the façade.
installations
Floor level
+ 2700
installations
sub-system level
Load bearing	 1. base element	 B-level	 1,0
Enclosure		 1. base element	 S-level	 1,0
Enclosure		 1. base element	 SS-level 4x	 1,0
			 2. base el. two lvls	SS-level 3x	 0,6
			Total	 enclosure	 SS-level	 0,83
1.00
St Co
1.01
St Be
1.05
Pr Bo
2.10
La FF
2.13
SFF
2.11
Wi Fr
2.14
Ex Fi
2.12
In Fi
2.00
La FF
2.03
SFF
2.01
Wi Fr
2.04
Ex Fi
2.02
In Fi
2.06
Ex Fi
+2.00
La FF
-2.03
SFF
+2.10
La FF
-2.13
SFF
1.06
Co St
3.01
M St
3.02
Pl fi
2.15
So Sh
Infill
Enclosure
Load
bearing
3.04
LCF
3.05
LCP
sub-systems
components
elements
elements
3.02
I Insu
Service
4.03
S HD
4.04
S VD
4.06
S WD
4.01
S CD
4.02
Ca G
4.04
Radtr
elements
2.05
So Sh
elements
materials
1.03
An Fl
1.03
IC Fl
1.02
Co Fl
1.04
St Fi
- 23 -
	 standardization of product edge
Assessment
1. pre-made geometry				1,0
2. half standardized geometry			 0,5
3. geometry made on construction site		 0,1
Examine reuse potential - Building Hs
installations
Floor level
+ 2700
installations
Load bearing	 average 	 0,71
Enclosure		 average 	 0,94
Infill			 average 	 0,6
Service		 average 	 0,58
1.00
St Co
+2.10
3.01
M St
3.02
Pl fi
Infill
3.04
LCF
3.05
LCP
elements
3.02
I Insu
Service
4.03
S HD
4.04
S VD
4.06
S WD
4.01
S CD
4.02
Ca G
4.04
Radtr
elements
1.01
St Be
1.05
Pr Bo
1.06
Co St
Load
bearing
elements
materials
1.03
An Fl
1.03
IC Fl
1.02
Co Fl
1,0
metry 0,5
e 0,1
1.04
St Fi
1.00
St Co
2.10
La FF
2.13
SFF
2.11
Wi Fr
2.14
Ex Fi
2.12
In Fi
2.00
La FF
2.03
SFF
2.01
Wi Fr
2.04
Ex Fi
2.02
In Fi
2.06
Ex Fi
+2.00
La FF
-2.03
SFF
+2.10
La FF
-2.13
SFF
3.01
M St
3.02
Pl fi
2.15
So Sh
Infill
Enclosure
3.04
LCF
3.05
LCP
sub-systems
components
elements
elements
3.02
I Insu
Service
4.03
S HD
4.04
S VD
4.06
S WD
4.01
S CD
4.02
Ca G
4.04
Radtr
elements
2.05
So Sh
1.01
St Be
1.05
Pr Bo
1.06
Co St
Load
bearing
elements
materials
1.03
An Fl
1.03
IC Fl
1.02
Co Fl
1. Pre-made geometry 1,0
2. half standardized geometry 0,5
3. Geometry made on site 0,1
Assessment
1.04
St Fi
1.00
St Co
2.10
La FF
2.13
SFF
2.11
Wi Fr
2.14
Ex Fi
2.12
In Fi
2.00
La FF
2.03
SFF
2.01
Wi Fr
2.04
Ex Fi
2.02
In Fi
2.06
Ex Fi
+2.00
La FF
-2.03
SFF
+2.10
La FF
-2.13
SFF
3.01
M St
3.02
Pl fi
2.15
So Sh
Infill
Enclosure
3.04
LCF
3.05
LCP
sub-systems
components
elements
elements
3.02
I Insu
Service
4.03
S HD
4.04
S VD
4.06
S WD
4.01
S CD
4.02
Ca G
4.04
Radtr
elements
2.05
So Sh
1.01
St Be
1.05
Pr Bo
1.06
Co St
Load
bearing
elements
materials
1.03
An Fl
1.03
IC Fl
1.02
Co Fl
1. Pre-made geometry 1,0
2. half standardized geometry 0,5
3. Geometry made on site 0,1
Assessment
1.04
St Fi
2.10
La FF
2.13
SFF
2.11
Wi Fr
2.14
Ex Fi
2.12
In Fi
2.00
La FF
2.03
SFF
2.01
Wi Fr
2.04
Ex Fi
2.02
In Fi
2.06
Ex Fi
+2.00
La FF
-2.03
SFF
+2.10
La FF
-2.13
SFF
3.01
M St
3.02
Pl fi
2.15
So Sh
Infill
Enclosure
3.04
LCF
3.05
LCP
sub-systems
components
elements
elements
3.02
I Insu
Service
4.03
S HD
4.04
S VD
4.06
S WD
4.01
S CD
4.02
Ca G
4.04
Radtr
elements
2.05
So Sh
Co St
materials
1.03
An Fl
1.03
IC Fl
2. half standardized geometry 0,5
3. Geometry made on site 0,1
Infill
Loa
bear
elements
materials
1.03
An Fl
1
IC
1
C
1. Pre-made geometry 1,0
2. half standardized geometry 0,5
3. Geometry made on site 0,1
Assessment
- 24 -
	 assembly direction
Examine reuse potential - Building Hs
181
Figure 5.20: Five assembly relations play
a role in typology of the configurations.
Distinction is based on the assembly
direction.
installations
Floor level
+ 2700
installations
Transformable Building Structures Chapter 5
Figure 5.20: Five assembly relations play
a role in typology of the configurations.
Distinction is based on the assembly
direction.
assembly direction
- 25 -
installations
Floor level
+ 2700
installations
Step 2
Step 1
Step 3
Step 4
Step 5
Step 6
Step 7
Step 8
Step 9
Assemblysequences
Step 10
Step 11
Step 12
Step 13
Step 14
Examine reuse potential - Building Hs
assembly direction
- 26 -
installations
Floor level
+ 2700
installations
Step 2
Step 1
Step 3
Step 4
Step 5
Step 6
Step 7
Step 8
Step 9
Assemblysequences
Step 10
Step 11
Step 12
Step 13
Step 14
E1
E1 steel structure
Examine reuse potential - Building Hs
assembly direction
- 27 -
installations
Floor level
+ 2700
installations
Step 2
Step 1
Step 3
Step 4
Step 5
Step 6
Step 7
Step 8
Step 9
Assemblysequences
Step 10
Step 11
Step 12
Step 13
Step 14
E2
E2 prefab concrete floorE1
E1 steel structure
Examine reuse potential - Building Hs
assembly direction
- 28 -
installations
Floor level
+ 2700
installations
Step 2
Step 1
Step 3
Step 4
Step 5
Step 6
Step 7
Step 8
Step 9
Assemblysequences
Step 10
Step 11
Step 12
Step 13
Step 14
M3
M3 in-situ concrete floorE2
E2 prefab concrete floorE1
E1 steel structure
Examine reuse potential - Building Hs
- 29 -
installations
Floor level
+ 2700
installations
Examine reuse potential - Building Hs
Step 2
Step 1
Step 3
Step 4
Step 5
Step 6
Step 7
Step 8
Step 9
Assemblysequences
Step 10
Step 11
Step 12
Step 13
Step 14 E23
E23 cable gutter
E22
E22 lowered ceiling
E21
E21 radiator
E20 E20 installations (air distribution, electa
& data distribution, water distribution)
E19
E19 interior partitioning
C18 C18 Solar shading
E17 E17 wall finishE16
E16 exterior facade cladding panels
E15 E15 windowsillE14
E14 cladding around window frameC13
C13 window frame
E12
E12 wooden cladding suspension barE11
E11 Flashing profile
M10
M10 anhydrite floor
E9 facade connection
E9
C8
C8 small facade frameC7
C7 main facade frame
C6
C6 adjacent facade componentE5
E5 fire resistant material
E4
E4 facade connection device
M3
M3 in-situ concrete floorE2
E2 prefab concrete floorE1
E1 steel structure
installations
Floor level
+ 2700
installations
	 assembly direction
- 30 -
Examine reuse potential - Building Hs
installations
Floor level
+ 2700
installations
Main facade frame cluster
Step 2
Step 1
Step 3
Step 4
Step 5
Step 6
Step 7
Step 8
Step 9
Assemblysequences
Step 10
Step 11
Step 12
Step 13
Step 14 E23
E23 cable gutter
E22
E22 lowered ceiling
E21
E21 radiator
E20 E20 installations (air distribution, electa
& data distribution, water distribution)
E19
E19 interior partitioning
C18 C18 Solar shading
E17 E17 wall finishE16
E16 exterior facade cladding panels
E15 E15 windowsillE14
E14 cladding around window frameC13
C13 window frame
E12
E12 wooden cladding suspension barE11
E11 Flashing profile
M10
M10 anhydrite floor
E9 facade connection
E9
C8
C8 small facade frameC7
C7 main facade frame
C6
C6 adjacent facade componentE5
E5 fire resistant material
E4
E4 facade connection device
M3
M3 in-situ concrete floorE2
E2 prefab concrete floorE1
E1 steel structure
	 assembly direction
- 31 -
Examine reuse potential - Building Hs
installations
Floor level
+ 2700
installations
Main facade frame cluster
Step 13
Step 14
Step 12
Step 11
Step 10
Step 9
Step 8
Step 7
Step 6
Disassemblysequence
Step 5
Step 4
Step 3
Step 2
Step 1 E23
E23 cable gutter
E22
E22 lowered ceiling
E21
E21 radiator
E20 E20 installations (air distribution, electa
& data distribution, water distribution)
E19
E19 interior partitioning
C18
C18 Solar shading
E17
E17 wall finishE16
E16 exterior facade cladding panels
E15
E15 windowsill
E14
E14 cladding around window frame
C13
C13 window frame
E12
E12 wooden cladding suspension bar
E11 E11 Flashing profile
M10
M10 anhydrite floor
E9 facade connection
E9
C8
C8 small facade frame
C7
C7 main facade frame
C6
C6 adjacent facade componentE5
E5 fire resistant material
E4
E4 facade connection device
M3
M3 in-situ concrete floorE2
E2 prefab concrete floorE1
E1 steel structure
	 assembly direction
- 32 -
Main facade frame cluster
Step 13
Step 14
Step 12
Step 11
Step 10
Step 9
Step 8
Step 7
Step 6
Disassemblysequence
Step 5
Step 4
Step 3
Step 2
Step 1 E23
E23 cable gutter
E22
E22 lowered ceiling
E21
E21 radiator
E20 E20 installations (air distribution, electa
& data distribution, water distribution)
E19
E19 interior partitioning
C18
C18 Solar shading
E17
E17 wall finishE16
E16 exterior facade cladding panels
E15
E15 windowsill
E14
E14 cladding around window frame
C13
C13 window frame
E12
E12 wooden cladding suspension bar
E11 E11 Flashing profile
M10
M10 anhydrite floor
E9 facade connection
E9
C8
C8 small facade frame
C7
C7 main facade frame
C6
C6 adjacent facade componentE5
E5 fire resistant material
E4
E4 facade connection device
M3
M3 in-situ concrete floorE2
E2 prefab concrete floorE1
E1 steel structure
Examine reuse potential - Building Hs
installations
Floor level
+ 2700
installationsinstallationsinstallations
Floor level
+ 2700
	 assembly direction
- 33 -
Main facade frame cluster
Step 13
Step 14
Step 12
Step 11
Step 10
Step 9
Step 8
Step 7
Step 6
Disassemblysequence
Step 5
Step 4
Step 3
Step 2
Step 1 E23
E23 cable gutter
E22
E22 lowered ceiling
E21
E21 radiator
E20 E20 installations (air distribution, electa
& data distribution, water distribution)
E19
E19 interior partitioning
C18
C18 Solar shading
E17
E17 wall finishE16
E16 exterior facade cladding panels
E15
E15 windowsill
E14
E14 cladding around window frame
C13
C13 window frame
E12
E12 wooden cladding suspension bar
E11 E11 Flashing profile
M10
M10 anhydrite floor
E9 facade connection
E9
C8
C8 small facade frame
C7
C7 main facade frame
C6
C6 adjacent facade componentE5
E5 fire resistant material
E4
E4 facade connection device
M3
M3 in-situ concrete floorE2
E2 prefab concrete floorE1
E1 steel structure
Examine reuse potential - Building Hs
installations
Floor level
+ 2700
installationsinstallationsinstallations
Floor level
+ 2700
	 assembly direction
Assessment
1. gravity attractor				1,0
2. parrallel					0,6
3. semi-parralel				0,4
4. sequential					0,1
Enclosure		 3. semi-parralel	 0,4
- 34 -
Examine reuse potential - Building Hs
installations
Floor level
+ 2700
installations
cut loose cut loose
Main facade frame cluster
Step 13
Step 14
Step 12
Step 11
Step 10
Step 9
Step 8
Step 7
Step 6
Disassemblysequence
Step 5
Step 4
Step 3
Step 2
Step 1 E23
E23 cable gutter
E22
E22 lowered ceiling
E21
E21 radiator
E20 E20 installations (air distribution, electa
& data distribution, water distribution)
E19
E19 interior partitioning
C18
C18 Solar shading
E17
E17 wall finishE16
E16 exterior facade cladding panels
E15
E15 windowsill
E14
E14 cladding around window frame
C13
C13 window frame
E12
E12 wooden cladding suspension bar
E11 E11 Flashing profile
M10
M10 anhydrite floor
E9 facade connection
E9
C8
C8 small facade frame
C7
C7 main facade frame
C6
C6 adjacent facade componentE5
E5 fire resistant material
E4
E4 facade connection device
M3
M3 in-situ concrete floorE2
E2 prefab concrete floorE1
E1 steel structure
	 assembly direction
- 35 -
Examine reuse potential - Building Hs
	 functional dependence
Chapter 5
Scenario 4:
total separation or zoning
Functional incorporation can also be shown using examples of façades. Often,
relocation or resizing of façade openings has consequences on load bearing
elements, or on the finishing of a façade. Portions of a brick façade as well as its
inner wall may need to be demolished .
5.2.2 Systematisation
1
c - construction
f - finishing
s - servicing
i - isolation4
2
3
total integration
planned interpenetration
unplanned interpenetration
total seperation
Functions within
floor system:
TraChapter 5
Scenario 4:
total separation or zoning
Functional incorporation can also be shown using examples of façades. Often,
relocation or resizing of façade openings has consequences on load bearing
elements, or on the finishing of a façade. Portions of a brick façade as well as its
inner wall may need to be demolished .
1
c - construction
f - finishing
s - servicing
i - isolation4
2
3
total integration
planned interpenetration
unplanned interpenetration
total seperation
Functions within a
floor system:
installations
Floor level
+ 2700
installations
Installations (air, electra & data and water
distribution) - total seperation 1,0
Heating - planned interpenetration 0,8
Cable gutter - planned interpenetration 0,8
Assessment
1. modular zoning					1,0
2. planned interpenetration for different solutions	 0,8
3. planned interpenetration for one solution		 0,4
4. unplanned interpenetration			 0,2
5. total dependency					0,1
- 36 -
	 type of connection
Assessment
Examine reuse potential - Building Hs
183
Transformable Building Structures Chapter 5
or can be connections between concrete floor panels, or bricks etc. Disassembly
of such connections is often impossible, or it requires development of special
deconstruction technologies as for example laser technologies.
Type of connections is determined by type of material in connection, does it has
accessory, type of accessory and position of accessory.
Four basic displacements that together make all transformations in the structure
are: elimination, addition, relocation, and substitution. The structure of a building
or its parts can be transformed by elimination of an element. It can also be
Direct chemical connection
two elements are permanently fixed (no
reuse, no recycling)
direct connections between two
pre-made components
two elements are dependent in assembly/
disassembly (no component reuse)
indirect connection with third
chemical material
two elements are connected permanently
with third material (no reuse, no recycling)
direct connections with additional
fixing devices
two elements are connected with accessory
which can be replaced. If one element has
to be removed than whole connection needs
to be dismantled
indirect connection via dependent
third component
two elements/components are separated
with third element/component, but they
have dependence in assembly (reuse is
restricted)
indirect connection via independent
third component
there is dependence in assembly/
disassembly but all elements could be
reused or recycled
indirect with additional fixing device
with change of one element another stays
untouched
all elements could be reused or recycled
type of connection graphic representation dependence in assembly
fixed
flexible
Figure 5.21: Seven principles of
connections ranged from fixed to flexible
connections.
installations
Floor level
+ 2700
installations
2.12
In Fi
2.00
La FF
2.03
SFF
2.01
Wi Fr
2.04
Ex Fi
2.02
In Fi
2.06
Ex Fi
+2.00
La FF
-2.03
SFF
Enclosure
sub-systems
components
elements
2.05
So Sh
1. Indirect with additional fixing device 1,0
2. Indirect connection via independent third element 0,8
3. Indirect connection via dependent third element 0,7
4. Direct connection with additional fixing device 0,6
5. Direct connec. between two pre-made comp. 0,4
6. Indirect connection with third chemical material 0,2
7. Direct chemical connection 0,1
Type of connection
- 37 -
	 type of connection
Examine reuse potential - Building Hs
installations
Floor level
+ 2700
installations
1.00
St Co
1.01
St Be
1.05
Pr Bo
2.10
La FF
2.13
SFF
2.11
Wi Fr
2.14
Ex Fi
2.12
In Fi
2.00
La FF
2.03
SFF
2.01
Wi Fr
2.04
Ex Fi
2.02
In Fi
2.06
Ex Fi
+2.00
La FF
-2.03
SFF
+2.10
La FF
-2.13
SFF
1.06
Co St
3.01
M St
3.02
Pl fi
2.15
So Sh
Infill
Enclosure
Load
bearing
3.04
LCF
3.05
LCP
sub-systems
components
elements
elements
3.02
I Insu
Service
4.03
S HD
4.04
S VD
4.06
S WD
4.01
S CD
4.02
Ca G
4.04
Radtr
elements
2.05
So Sh
elements
materials
1.03
An Fl
1.03
IC Fl
1.02
Co Fl
1. Indirect with additional fixing device 1,0
2. Indirect connection via independent third element 0,8
3. Indirect connection via dependent third element 0,7
4. Direct connection with additional fixing device 0,6
5. Direct connec. between two pre-made comp. 0,4
6. Indirect connection with third chemical material 0,2
7. Direct chemical connection 0,1
Type of connection
1.04
St Fi
1.00
St Co
1.01
St Be
1.05
Pr Bo
2.10
La FF
2.13
SFF
2.11
Wi Fr
2.14
Ex Fi
2.12
In Fi
2.00
La FF
2.03
SFF
2.01
Wi Fr
2.04
Ex Fi
2.02
In Fi
2.06
Ex Fi
+2.00
La FF
-2.03
SFF
+2.10
La FF
-2.13
SFF
1.06
Co St
3.01
M St
3.02
Pl fi
2.15
So Sh
Infill
Enclosure
Load
bearing
3.04
LCF
3.05
LCP
sub-systems
components
elements
elements
3.02
I Insu
4.06
S WD
elements
2.05
So Sh
elements
materials
1.03
An Fl
1.03
IC Fl
1.02
Co Fl
1. Indirect with additional fixing device 1,0
2. Indirect connection via independent third element 0,8
3. Indirect connection via dependent third element 0,7
4. Direct connection with additional fixing device 0,6
5. Direct connec. between two pre-made comp. 0,4
6. Indirect connection with third chemical material 0,2
7. Direct chemical connection 0,1
Type of connection
1.04
St Fi
Load bearing	 average	0,36
Enclosure		 average	 0,79
Infill			 average	0,58
Service		 average	0,58
- 38 -
0,00
0,20
0,40
0,60
0,80
1,00
1. assembly direction
2. functional
dependence
3. structure and
material levels
4. base element
specification
5. relational pattern
6. standardization of
product edge
7. type of connection
Service
0,00
0,20
0,40
0,60
0,80
1,00
1. assembly direction
2. functional
dependence
3. structure and
material levels
4. base element
specification
5. relational pattern
6. standardization of
product edge
7. type of connection
Enclosure
0,00
0,20
0,40
0,60
0,80
1,00
1. assembly direction
2. functional
dependence
3. structure and
material levels
4. base element
specification
5. relational pattern
6. standardization of
product edge
7. type of connection
Load bearing
Results reuse potential - Building Hs
installations
Floor level
+ 2700
installations
Reuse potential average
load bearing	 0,59
enclosure		 0,74
infill	 	 	 0,44
service		 0,46
0,00
0,20
0,40
0,60
0,80
1,00
1. assembly direction
2. functional
dependence
3. structure and
material levels
4. base element
specification
5. relational pattern
6. standardization of
product edge
7. type of connection
Infill
- 39 -
0,00
0,20
0,40
0,60
0,80
1,00
1. assembly direction
2. functional
dependence
3. structure and
material levels
4. base element
specification
5. relational pattern
6. standardization of
product edge
7. type of connection
Service
0,00
0,20
0,40
0,60
0,80
1,00
1. assembly direction
2. functional
dependence
3. structure and
material levels
4. base element
specification
5. relational pattern
6. standardization of
product edge
7. type of connection
Enclosure
0,00
0,20
0,40
0,60
0,80
1,00
1. assembly direction
2. functional
dependence
3. structure and
material levels
4. base element
specification
5. relational pattern
6. standardization of
product edge
7. type of connection
Load bearing
Results reuse potential - Building Hs
installations
Floor level
+ 2700
installations
Reuse potential average
load bearing	 0,59
enclosure		 0,74
infill	 	 	 0,44
service		 0,46
0,00
0,20
0,40
0,60
0,80
1,00
1. assembly direction
2. functional
dependence
3. structure and
material levels
4. base element
specification
5. relational pattern
6. standardization of
product edge
7. type of connection
Infill
- 40 -
Erasmus building H, Dijkzicht (1960)
- 41 -
EAST FACADE
WEST FACADE
16
15 17
19
20
21
Erasmus building H, Dijkzicht (1960)
Section B-B
- 42 -
6th floor similar to 2nd - 9th floor
Erasmus building H, Dijkzicht (1960)
- 43 -
1.00
St Co
1.01
St Be
1.05
Pr Bo
2.10
La FF
2.13
SFF
2.11
Wi Fr
2.14
Ex Fi
2.12
In Fi
2.00
La FF
2.03
SFF
2.01
Wi Fr
2.04
Ex Fi
2.02
In Fi
2.06
Ex Fi
+2.00
La FF
-2.03
SFF
+2.10
La FF
-2.13
SFF
1.06
Co St
3.01
M St
3.02
Pl fi
2.15
So Sh
Infill
Enclosure
Load
bearing
3.04
LCF
3.05
LCP
sub-systems
components
elements
elements
3.02
I Insu
4.06
S WD
elements
2.05
So Sh
elements
materials
1.03
An Fl
1.03
IC Fl
1.02
Co Fl
1. Indirect with additional fixing device 1,0
2. Indirect connection via independent third element 0,8
3. Indirect connection via dependent third element 0,7
4. Direct connection with additional fixing device 0,6
5. Direct connec. between two pre-made comp. 0,4
6. Indirect connection with third chemical material 0,2
7. Direct chemical connection 0,1
Type of connection
1.04
St Fi
	 type of connection
Examine reuse potential - Building H
1.00
CC+x
1.01
CF+x
1.02
CC+1
1.03
CF+1
2.10
top
2.15
Ex SS
2.11
Ex FF
2.12
In FF
2.14
In SS
3.01
LCF
2.08
Pa IF
2.07
Ex M
materials
components
Enclosure
Load
bearing
Infill
3.02
LCP
3.00
Pa In
2.05
Ex SS
2.02
In FF
2.01
Ex FF
2.04
In SS
2.06
Co Pa
2.00
top
2.03
Ou Fi
2.13
Ou Fi
elements
elements
materials
2.09
Ex Fi
1.00
St Co
1.01
St Be
1.05
Pr Bo
2.10
La FF
2.13
SFF
2.11
Wi Fr
2.14
Ex Fi
2.12
In Fi
2.00
La FF
2.03
SFF
2.01
Wi Fr
2.04
Ex Fi
2.02
In Fi
2.06
Ex Fi
+2.00
La FF
-2.03
SFF
+2.10
La FF
-2.13
SFF
1.06
Co St
3.01
M St
3.02
Pl fi
2.15
So Sh
Infill
Enclosure
Load
bearing
3.04
LCF
3.05
LCP
sub-systems
components
elements
elements
3.02
I Insu
el
2.05
So Sh
elements
materials
1.03
An Fl
1.03
IC Fl
1.02
Co Fl
1. Indirect with additional fixing device 1,0
2. Indirect connection via independent third element 0,8
3. Indirect connection via dependent third element 0,7
4. Direct connection with additional fixing device 0,6
5. Direct connec. between two pre-made comp. 0,4
6. Indirect connection with third chemical material 0,2
7. Direct chemical connection 0,1
Type of connection
1.04
St Fi
- 44 -
amount of window frames
Outside 592x
Inside 592x
total 1184x
Section 15
Examine reuse potential - Building Hs
- 45 -
Examine reuse potential - Building Hs
Source: Durmisevic (2010) Green design and assembly of buildings and systems
TRANSFORMATION
CAPACITY
REUSEPOTENTIAL
Durmisevic, 2006
- 46 -
Examine reuse potential - Building H
Enclosure		 4. material/ elements/ components	 0,4
	 structure and material levels
Assessment
1. components					1,0
2. elements/ components				0,8
3. elements						0,6
4. material/ element/ component			 0,4
5. material/ element					0,2
6. material						0,1
1.00
CC+x
1.01
CF+x
1.02
CC+1
1.03
CF+1
2.10
top
2.15
Ex SS
2.11
In FF
2.12
Ex FF
2.14
In SS
3.01
LCF
2.08
Pa IF
2.07
Ex M
materials
components
Enclosure
Load
bearing
Infill
3.02
LCP
3.00
Pa In
2.05
Ex SS
2.02
In FF
2.01
Ex FF
2.04
In SS
2.06
Co Pa
2.00
top
2.03
Ou Fi
2.13
Ou Fi
elements
elements
materials
1. Pre-made geometry 1,0
2. half standardized geometry 0,5
3. Geometry made on site 0,1
Assessment
2.09
Ex Fi
- 47 -
Examine reuse potential - Building H
	 base element specification
Assessment
1. base element - intermediary between systems/compo-
nents							1,0
2. base element on two levels 			 0,6
3. element with two functions (base element + function) 	
							0,4
4. no base element					0,1
System level
Enclosure	 1. base element with two functions	 0,4
1.00
CC+x
1.01
CF+x
1.02
CC+1
1.03
CF+1
2.10
top
2.15
Ex SS
2.11
Ex FF
2.12
In FF
2.14
In SS
3.01
LCF
2.08
Pa IF
2.07
Ex M
materials
components
Enclosure
Load
bearing
Infill
3.02
LCP
3.00
Pa In
2.05
Ex SS
2.02
In FF
2.01
Ex FF
2.04
In SS
2.06
Co Pa
2.00
top
2.03
Ou Fi
2.13
Ou Fi
elements
elements
materials
1. Pre-made geometry 1,0
2. half standardized geometry 0,5
3. Geometry made on site 0,1
Assessment
2.09
Ex Fi
Load-bearing structure
Steel window frame
Intermediar -
base element
Load-bearing
structure
Masonry
Masonry
- 48 -
	 relational pattern
	 building level	 0,4
Assessment
1. vertical						1,0
2. horizontal in lower zone at the diagram		 0,6
3. horizontal between upper and lower zone		 0,4
4. horizontal in upper zone				 0,1
1.01
St Be
2.10
La FF
2.13
SFF
2.11
Wi Fr
2.14
Ex Fi
2.12
In Fi
2.00
La FF
2.03
SFF
2.01
Wi Fr
2.04
Ex Fi
2.02
In Fi
2.06
Ex Fi
+2.00
La FF
-2.03
SFF
+2.10
La FF
-2.13
SFF
3.01
M St
3.02
Pl fi
2.15
So Sh
Infill
Enclosure
3.04
LCF
3.05
LCP
sub-systems
components
elements
elements
3.02
I Insu
2.05
So Sh
elements
materials
1.03
An Fl
1.03
IC Fl
1.02
Co Fl
vertical connections
horizontal connections
Type of connection
1.04
St Fi
1.00
CC+x
1.01
CF+x
1.02
CC+1
1.03
CF+1
2.10
top
2.15
Ex SS
2.11
In FF
2.12
Ex FF
2.14
In SS
3.01
LCF
2.08
Pa IF
2.07
Ex M
materials
components
Enclosure
Load
bearing
Infill
3.02
LCP
3.00
Pa In
2.05
Ex SS
2.02
In FF
2.01
Ex FF
2.04
In SS
2.06
Co Pa
2.00
top
2.03
Ou Fi
2.13
Ou Fi
elements
elements
materials
2.09
Ex Fi
Examine reuse potential - Building H
- 49 -
	 relational pattern
Assessment
1. vertical						1,0
2. horizontal in lower zone at the diagram		 0,6
3. horizontal between upper and lower zone		 0,4
4. horizontal in upper zone				 0,1
Examine reuse potential - Building H
	 system level 	 0,6
	
Enclosure		 2. horizontal between upper and lower zone	0,4
1.01
St Be
2.10
La FF
2.13
SFF
2.11
Wi Fr
2.14
Ex Fi
2.12
In Fi
2.00
La FF
2.03
SFF
2.01
Wi Fr
2.04
Ex Fi
2.02
In Fi
2.06
Ex Fi
+2.00
La FF
-2.03
SFF
+2.10
La FF
-2.13
SFF
3.01
M St
3.02
Pl fi
2.15
So Sh
Infill
Enclosure
3.04
LCF
3.05
LCP
sub-systems
components
elements
elements
3.02
I Insu
2.05
So Sh
elements
materials
1.03
An Fl
1.03
IC Fl
1.02
Co Fl
vertical connections
horizontal connections
Type of connection
1.04
St Fi
1.00
CC+x
1.01
CF+x
1.02
CC+1
1.03
CF+1
2.10
top
2.15
Ex SS
2.11
Ex FF
2.12
In FF
2.14
In SS
3.01
LCF
2.08
Pa IF
2.07
Ex M
materials
components
Enclosure
Load
bearing
Infill
3.02
LCP
3.00
Pa In
2.05
Ex SS
2.02
In FF
2.01
Ex FF
2.04
In SS
2.06
Co Pa
2.00
top
2.03
Ou Fi
2.13
Ou Fi
elements
elements
materials
1. Pre-made geometry 1,0
2. half standardized geometry 0,5
3. Geometry made on site 0,1
Assessment
2.09
Ex Fi
- 50 -
	 standardization of product edge
Assessment
1. pre-made geometry				1,0
2. half standardized geometry			 0,5
3. geometry made on construction site		 0,1
Examine reuse potential - Building H
Enclosure		 average 	 0,75
Infill
Loa
bear
elements
materials
1.03
An Fl
1
IC
1
C
1. Pre-made geometry 1,0
2. half standardized geometry 0,5
3. Geometry made on site 0,1
Assessment
1.00
CC+x
1.01
CF+x
1.02
CC+1
1.03
CF+1
2.10
top
2.15
Ex SS
2.11
Ex FF
2.12
In FF
2.14
In SS
3.01
LCF
2.08
Pa IF
2.07
Ex M
materials
components
Enclosure
Load
bearing
Infill
3.02
LCP
3.00
Pa In
2.05
Ex SS
2.02
In FF
2.01
Ex FF
2.04
In SS
2.06
Co Pa
2.00
top
2.03
Ou Fi
2.13
Ou Fi
elements
elements
materials
1. Pre-made geometry 1,0
2. half standardized geometry 0,5
3. Geometry made on site 0,1
Assessment
2.09
Ex Fi
2.09
Ex Fi
- 51 -
	 type of connection
1.00
St Co
1.01
St Be
1.05
Pr Bo
2.10
La FF
2.13
SFF
2.11
Wi Fr
2.14
Ex Fi
2.12
In Fi
2.00
La FF
2.03
SFF
2.01
Wi Fr
2.04
Ex Fi
2.02
In Fi
2.06
Ex Fi
+2.00
La FF
-2.03
SFF
+2.10
La FF
-2.13
SFF
1.06
Co St
3.01
M St
3.02
Pl fi
2.15
So Sh
Infill
Enclosure
Load
bearing
3.04
LCF
3.05
LCP
sub-systems
components
elements
elements
3.02
I Insu
4.06
S WD
elements
2.05
So Sh
elements
materials
1.03
An Fl
1.03
IC Fl
1.02
Co Fl
1. Indirect with additional fixing device 1,0
2. Indirect connection via independent third element 0,8
3. Indirect connection via dependent third element 0,7
4. Direct connection with additional fixing device 0,6
5. Direct connec. between two pre-made comp. 0,4
6. Indirect connection with third chemical material 0,2
7. Direct chemical connection 0,1
Type of connection
1.04
St Fi
Enclosure	 avarage	0,46
Examine reuse potential - Building H
1.00
CC+x
1.01
CF+x
1.02
CC+1
1.03
CF+1
2.10
top
2.15
Ex SS
2.11
Ex FF
2.12
In FF
2.14
In SS
3.01
LCF
2.08
Pa IF
2.07
Ex M
materials
components
Enclosure
Load
bearing
Infill
3.02
LCP
3.00
Pa In
2.05
Ex SS
2.02
In FF
2.01
Ex FF
2.04
In SS
2.06
Co Pa
2.00
top
2.03
Ou Fi
2.13
Ou Fi
elements
elements
materials
2.09
Ex Fi
- 52 -
Results reuse potential - Building Hs
Reuse potential average
enclosure		 0,41
0,00
0,20
0,40
0,60
0,80
1. assembly direction
3. structure and
material levels
4. base element
specification
5. relational pattern
6. standardization of
product edge
7. type of connection
Enclosure
Re-design Re-manufacture Re-finance
Group 2 | Re-design of a
steel structure
Group 1 | Re-design of a
timber frame facade system
elop
options’
Select ‘high‘ potential
design options
Assessment on
technical, economic
and environmental
aspects
rational part
Re-design Re-manufacture Re-finanace
develope reuse scenarios
perspectives
Building Hs
smallest
configuration
largest
configuration
Group 2 | Re-design of a
steel facade frame system
Group 2 | Re-manufacturing of a
load-bearing structure incl. floor
(sub-group 1) and steel frame
facade system (sub-group 2)
Group 1 | Re-manufacturing of a
timber frame facade system
installations
Floor level
+ 2700
Group 2 | Re-finance of a
timber facade frame system
and load-bearing steel
structure
Group 1 | Re-finance of a
building by disassembly and
replacement
installations
creative part rational part
Building Hs
smallest
configuration
largest
configuration

More Related Content

Viewers also liked

Viewers also liked (8)

Industriele Woningbouw Japan: Prefabwoningen - Peter Fraanje - Innovatiecatal...
Industriele Woningbouw Japan: Prefabwoningen - Peter Fraanje - Innovatiecatal...Industriele Woningbouw Japan: Prefabwoningen - Peter Fraanje - Innovatiecatal...
Industriele Woningbouw Japan: Prefabwoningen - Peter Fraanje - Innovatiecatal...
 
Bouw van lineair naar circulair - Elma Durmisevic - Innovatiecatalogus 2017
Bouw van lineair naar circulair  - Elma Durmisevic - Innovatiecatalogus 2017Bouw van lineair naar circulair  - Elma Durmisevic - Innovatiecatalogus 2017
Bouw van lineair naar circulair - Elma Durmisevic - Innovatiecatalogus 2017
 
Snelle vervangende nieuwbouw - Peter Fraanje - Innovatiecatalogus 2017
Snelle vervangende nieuwbouw - Peter Fraanje - Innovatiecatalogus 2017Snelle vervangende nieuwbouw - Peter Fraanje - Innovatiecatalogus 2017
Snelle vervangende nieuwbouw - Peter Fraanje - Innovatiecatalogus 2017
 
20161130 Booosting Circular Demolition Erasmus MC - Presentation Gilli Hobbs...
20161130  Booosting Circular Demolition Erasmus MC - Presentation Gilli Hobbs...20161130  Booosting Circular Demolition Erasmus MC - Presentation Gilli Hobbs...
20161130 Booosting Circular Demolition Erasmus MC - Presentation Gilli Hobbs...
 
Booostingboek Digitaal Vakmanschap: Hfd 4 Geintegreerd bouwen aan unieke conf...
Booostingboek Digitaal Vakmanschap: Hfd 4 Geintegreerd bouwen aan unieke conf...Booostingboek Digitaal Vakmanschap: Hfd 4 Geintegreerd bouwen aan unieke conf...
Booostingboek Digitaal Vakmanschap: Hfd 4 Geintegreerd bouwen aan unieke conf...
 
20160615 Booosting Digitaal Vakmanschap in de Architectuur - Marcel Bilow (TUD)
20160615 Booosting Digitaal Vakmanschap in de Architectuur - Marcel Bilow (TUD)20160615 Booosting Digitaal Vakmanschap in de Architectuur - Marcel Bilow (TUD)
20160615 Booosting Digitaal Vakmanschap in de Architectuur - Marcel Bilow (TUD)
 
20161130 Booosting Circular Demolition Erasmus MC - Presentation Arjan Windh...
20161130  Booosting Circular Demolition Erasmus MC - Presentation Arjan Windh...20161130  Booosting Circular Demolition Erasmus MC - Presentation Arjan Windh...
20161130 Booosting Circular Demolition Erasmus MC - Presentation Arjan Windh...
 
Verslag projectbezoek circulair paviljoen ABN Amro op 20 januari 2017 door Ad...
Verslag projectbezoek circulair paviljoen ABN Amro op 20 januari 2017 door Ad...Verslag projectbezoek circulair paviljoen ABN Amro op 20 januari 2017 door Ad...
Verslag projectbezoek circulair paviljoen ABN Amro op 20 januari 2017 door Ad...
 

Similar to 20161130 Booosting Circular Demolition Erasmus MC - Presentation Pieter Beurskens UT

Basis of Design of Offshore Wind Turbines by System Decomposition
Basis of Design of Offshore Wind Turbines by System DecompositionBasis of Design of Offshore Wind Turbines by System Decomposition
Basis of Design of Offshore Wind Turbines by System DecompositionFranco Bontempi
 
Kinetic structures | B.arch
Kinetic structures | B.archKinetic structures | B.arch
Kinetic structures | B.archAs Per Design
 
Technical Paper No 2
Technical Paper No 2Technical Paper No 2
Technical Paper No 2Jerry Solov
 
أنظمة البناء الحديثة.pptx
أنظمة البناء الحديثة.pptxأنظمة البناء الحديثة.pptx
أنظمة البناء الحديثة.pptxHanaaHiari
 
Microsoft Word - BASE ISOLATION
Microsoft Word - BASE ISOLATIONMicrosoft Word - BASE ISOLATION
Microsoft Word - BASE ISOLATIONSumit Srivastav
 
IRJET- Review on Study of Folded Portable Structure
IRJET-  	  Review on Study of Folded Portable StructureIRJET-  	  Review on Study of Folded Portable Structure
IRJET- Review on Study of Folded Portable StructureIRJET Journal
 
Evaluating the efficiency of wheel loader bucket designs and bucket filling s...
Evaluating the efficiency of wheel loader bucket designs and bucket filling s...Evaluating the efficiency of wheel loader bucket designs and bucket filling s...
Evaluating the efficiency of wheel loader bucket designs and bucket filling s...Reno Filla
 
A modular framework to enable rapid evaluation and exploration of energy mana...
A modular framework to enable rapid evaluation and exploration of energy mana...A modular framework to enable rapid evaluation and exploration of energy mana...
A modular framework to enable rapid evaluation and exploration of energy mana...Nancy Ideker
 
IRJET - Economy in Building Construction Systems of Prefabricated Structures
IRJET - Economy in Building Construction Systems of Prefabricated StructuresIRJET - Economy in Building Construction Systems of Prefabricated Structures
IRJET - Economy in Building Construction Systems of Prefabricated StructuresIRJET Journal
 
COMMENTS ON THE PRACTICAL USE OF EC8.pdf
COMMENTS ON THE PRACTICAL USE OF EC8.pdfCOMMENTS ON THE PRACTICAL USE OF EC8.pdf
COMMENTS ON THE PRACTICAL USE OF EC8.pdfnhandoan10
 
Dependability of Offshore Wind Turbines
Dependability of Offshore Wind TurbinesDependability of Offshore Wind Turbines
Dependability of Offshore Wind TurbinesFranco Bontempi
 
Research (SF)
Research (SF)Research (SF)
Research (SF)S sasasa
 
Retrofitting of Concrete Structures: A Review
Retrofitting of Concrete Structures: A ReviewRetrofitting of Concrete Structures: A Review
Retrofitting of Concrete Structures: A ReviewIRJET Journal
 
Peer Critique – Final Report DraftCover SheetEGR386wSummer.docx
Peer Critique – Final Report DraftCover SheetEGR386wSummer.docxPeer Critique – Final Report DraftCover SheetEGR386wSummer.docx
Peer Critique – Final Report DraftCover SheetEGR386wSummer.docxherbertwilson5999
 
IRJET- Analysis and Design of Residential Building with Floating Column
IRJET- Analysis and Design of Residential Building with Floating ColumnIRJET- Analysis and Design of Residential Building with Floating Column
IRJET- Analysis and Design of Residential Building with Floating ColumnIRJET Journal
 
Prieto post disaster reconstruction model 03 27 13
Prieto post disaster reconstruction model 03 27 13Prieto post disaster reconstruction model 03 27 13
Prieto post disaster reconstruction model 03 27 13Bob Prieto
 
Chapter 10 discussion and conclusion
Chapter 10   discussion and conclusionChapter 10   discussion and conclusion
Chapter 10 discussion and conclusionLokman Hakim Ismail
 
Seismic retrofit for rcc structureslocal global consequences
Seismic retrofit for rcc structureslocal global consequencesSeismic retrofit for rcc structureslocal global consequences
Seismic retrofit for rcc structureslocal global consequencesHashim k abdul azeez
 
Seismic base isolation in strengthening an existing retrofitted masonry reinf...
Seismic base isolation in strengthening an existing retrofitted masonry reinf...Seismic base isolation in strengthening an existing retrofitted masonry reinf...
Seismic base isolation in strengthening an existing retrofitted masonry reinf...eSAT Journals
 

Similar to 20161130 Booosting Circular Demolition Erasmus MC - Presentation Pieter Beurskens UT (20)

Basis of Design of Offshore Wind Turbines by System Decomposition
Basis of Design of Offshore Wind Turbines by System DecompositionBasis of Design of Offshore Wind Turbines by System Decomposition
Basis of Design of Offshore Wind Turbines by System Decomposition
 
Kinetic structures | B.arch
Kinetic structures | B.archKinetic structures | B.arch
Kinetic structures | B.arch
 
Technical Paper No 2
Technical Paper No 2Technical Paper No 2
Technical Paper No 2
 
أنظمة البناء الحديثة.pptx
أنظمة البناء الحديثة.pptxأنظمة البناء الحديثة.pptx
أنظمة البناء الحديثة.pptx
 
Microsoft Word - BASE ISOLATION
Microsoft Word - BASE ISOLATIONMicrosoft Word - BASE ISOLATION
Microsoft Word - BASE ISOLATION
 
IRJET- Review on Study of Folded Portable Structure
IRJET-  	  Review on Study of Folded Portable StructureIRJET-  	  Review on Study of Folded Portable Structure
IRJET- Review on Study of Folded Portable Structure
 
Evaluating the efficiency of wheel loader bucket designs and bucket filling s...
Evaluating the efficiency of wheel loader bucket designs and bucket filling s...Evaluating the efficiency of wheel loader bucket designs and bucket filling s...
Evaluating the efficiency of wheel loader bucket designs and bucket filling s...
 
A modular framework to enable rapid evaluation and exploration of energy mana...
A modular framework to enable rapid evaluation and exploration of energy mana...A modular framework to enable rapid evaluation and exploration of energy mana...
A modular framework to enable rapid evaluation and exploration of energy mana...
 
IRJET - Economy in Building Construction Systems of Prefabricated Structures
IRJET - Economy in Building Construction Systems of Prefabricated StructuresIRJET - Economy in Building Construction Systems of Prefabricated Structures
IRJET - Economy in Building Construction Systems of Prefabricated Structures
 
COMMENTS ON THE PRACTICAL USE OF EC8.pdf
COMMENTS ON THE PRACTICAL USE OF EC8.pdfCOMMENTS ON THE PRACTICAL USE OF EC8.pdf
COMMENTS ON THE PRACTICAL USE OF EC8.pdf
 
Dependability of Offshore Wind Turbines
Dependability of Offshore Wind TurbinesDependability of Offshore Wind Turbines
Dependability of Offshore Wind Turbines
 
Research (SF)
Research (SF)Research (SF)
Research (SF)
 
Retrofitting of Concrete Structures: A Review
Retrofitting of Concrete Structures: A ReviewRetrofitting of Concrete Structures: A Review
Retrofitting of Concrete Structures: A Review
 
Peer Critique – Final Report DraftCover SheetEGR386wSummer.docx
Peer Critique – Final Report DraftCover SheetEGR386wSummer.docxPeer Critique – Final Report DraftCover SheetEGR386wSummer.docx
Peer Critique – Final Report DraftCover SheetEGR386wSummer.docx
 
Btech
BtechBtech
Btech
 
IRJET- Analysis and Design of Residential Building with Floating Column
IRJET- Analysis and Design of Residential Building with Floating ColumnIRJET- Analysis and Design of Residential Building with Floating Column
IRJET- Analysis and Design of Residential Building with Floating Column
 
Prieto post disaster reconstruction model 03 27 13
Prieto post disaster reconstruction model 03 27 13Prieto post disaster reconstruction model 03 27 13
Prieto post disaster reconstruction model 03 27 13
 
Chapter 10 discussion and conclusion
Chapter 10   discussion and conclusionChapter 10   discussion and conclusion
Chapter 10 discussion and conclusion
 
Seismic retrofit for rcc structureslocal global consequences
Seismic retrofit for rcc structureslocal global consequencesSeismic retrofit for rcc structureslocal global consequences
Seismic retrofit for rcc structureslocal global consequences
 
Seismic base isolation in strengthening an existing retrofitted masonry reinf...
Seismic base isolation in strengthening an existing retrofitted masonry reinf...Seismic base isolation in strengthening an existing retrofitted masonry reinf...
Seismic base isolation in strengthening an existing retrofitted masonry reinf...
 

More from Booosting platform voor koplopers in bouwinnovatie

More from Booosting platform voor koplopers in bouwinnovatie (20)

Interview Rutger Snoek Circulair Isolatieglas
Interview Rutger Snoek Circulair IsolatieglasInterview Rutger Snoek Circulair Isolatieglas
Interview Rutger Snoek Circulair Isolatieglas
 
200305 Booosting Goood Woood - Pieters Bouwtechniek Delft Rob Doomen
200305 Booosting Goood Woood - Pieters Bouwtechniek Delft Rob Doomen200305 Booosting Goood Woood - Pieters Bouwtechniek Delft Rob Doomen
200305 Booosting Goood Woood - Pieters Bouwtechniek Delft Rob Doomen
 
200305 Booosting Goood Woood - cepezedbouwteam Jan Houtekamer
200305 Booosting Goood Woood - cepezedbouwteam Jan Houtekamer200305 Booosting Goood Woood - cepezedbouwteam Jan Houtekamer
200305 Booosting Goood Woood - cepezedbouwteam Jan Houtekamer
 
200305 Booosting Goood Woood - MetsäWood Bas Meeuwissen
200305 Booosting Goood Woood - MetsäWood Bas Meeuwissen200305 Booosting Goood Woood - MetsäWood Bas Meeuwissen
200305 Booosting Goood Woood - MetsäWood Bas Meeuwissen
 
200305 Booosting Goood Woood - cepezedprojects Menno Rubbens
200305 Booosting Goood Woood - cepezedprojects Menno Rubbens200305 Booosting Goood Woood - cepezedprojects Menno Rubbens
200305 Booosting Goood Woood - cepezedprojects Menno Rubbens
 
20200305 Booosting Goood Woood - Mathew Vola Arup
20200305 Booosting Goood Woood - Mathew Vola Arup20200305 Booosting Goood Woood - Mathew Vola Arup
20200305 Booosting Goood Woood - Mathew Vola Arup
 
200207 Cobouw-artikel over het glazen Co-Creation Centre
200207 Cobouw-artikel over het glazen Co-Creation Centre 200207 Cobouw-artikel over het glazen Co-Creation Centre
200207 Cobouw-artikel over het glazen Co-Creation Centre
 
200130 Second life - Thijs Asselbergs TUD - Gevel2020
200130 Second life - Thijs Asselbergs TUD - Gevel2020200130 Second life - Thijs Asselbergs TUD - Gevel2020
200130 Second life - Thijs Asselbergs TUD - Gevel2020
 
200211 Booosting @Co-Creation Centre - Tegenlezing
200211 Booosting @Co-Creation Centre - Tegenlezing200211 Booosting @Co-Creation Centre - Tegenlezing
200211 Booosting @Co-Creation Centre - Tegenlezing
 
200211 Booosting @Co-Creation Centre - Dow Silicones
200211 Booosting @Co-Creation Centre - Dow Silicones200211 Booosting @Co-Creation Centre - Dow Silicones
200211 Booosting @Co-Creation Centre - Dow Silicones
 
200211 Booosting @Co-Creation Centre - ABT
200211 Booosting @Co-Creation Centre - ABT200211 Booosting @Co-Creation Centre - ABT
200211 Booosting @Co-Creation Centre - ABT
 
200211 Booosting @Co-Creation Centre - Si-X
200211 Booosting @Co-Creation Centre - Si-X200211 Booosting @Co-Creation Centre - Si-X
200211 Booosting @Co-Creation Centre - Si-X
 
200211 Booosting @Co-Creation Centre - Mecanoo
200211 Booosting @Co-Creation Centre - Mecanoo200211 Booosting @Co-Creation Centre - Mecanoo
200211 Booosting @Co-Creation Centre - Mecanoo
 
200211 Booosting @Co-Creation Centre - Welkomstwoord van The Green Village
200211 Booosting @Co-Creation Centre - Welkomstwoord van The Green Village200211 Booosting @Co-Creation Centre - Welkomstwoord van The Green Village
200211 Booosting @Co-Creation Centre - Welkomstwoord van The Green Village
 
200211 Booosting @Co-Creation Centre - Introductie
200211 Booosting @Co-Creation Centre - Introductie200211 Booosting @Co-Creation Centre - Introductie
200211 Booosting @Co-Creation Centre - Introductie
 
200116 Bouwtex eindevent - Clemens Bernardt Hanze HS
200116 Bouwtex eindevent - Clemens Bernardt Hanze HS200116 Bouwtex eindevent - Clemens Bernardt Hanze HS
200116 Bouwtex eindevent - Clemens Bernardt Hanze HS
 
200115 Bouwtex Eindpresentatie - Aldus Bouwinnovatie Texflex
200115 Bouwtex Eindpresentatie - Aldus Bouwinnovatie Texflex 200115 Bouwtex Eindpresentatie - Aldus Bouwinnovatie Texflex
200115 Bouwtex Eindpresentatie - Aldus Bouwinnovatie Texflex
 
200115 Bouwtex Eindevent - Christian Struck
200115 Bouwtex Eindevent - Christian Struck200115 Bouwtex Eindevent - Christian Struck
200115 Bouwtex Eindevent - Christian Struck
 
200115 Bouwtex Eindpresentatie - Internal roomdivider
200115 Bouwtex Eindpresentatie - Internal roomdivider200115 Bouwtex Eindpresentatie - Internal roomdivider
200115 Bouwtex Eindpresentatie - Internal roomdivider
 
200115 Bouwtex Eindevent - Flexitex presentatie
200115 Bouwtex Eindevent - Flexitex presentatie200115 Bouwtex Eindevent - Flexitex presentatie
200115 Bouwtex Eindevent - Flexitex presentatie
 

Recently uploaded

Injustice - Developers Among Us (SciFiDevCon 2024)
Injustice - Developers Among Us (SciFiDevCon 2024)Injustice - Developers Among Us (SciFiDevCon 2024)
Injustice - Developers Among Us (SciFiDevCon 2024)Allon Mureinik
 
08448380779 Call Girls In Friends Colony Women Seeking Men
08448380779 Call Girls In Friends Colony Women Seeking Men08448380779 Call Girls In Friends Colony Women Seeking Men
08448380779 Call Girls In Friends Colony Women Seeking MenDelhi Call girls
 
Unblocking The Main Thread Solving ANRs and Frozen Frames
Unblocking The Main Thread Solving ANRs and Frozen FramesUnblocking The Main Thread Solving ANRs and Frozen Frames
Unblocking The Main Thread Solving ANRs and Frozen FramesSinan KOZAK
 
The Codex of Business Writing Software for Real-World Solutions 2.pptx
The Codex of Business Writing Software for Real-World Solutions 2.pptxThe Codex of Business Writing Software for Real-World Solutions 2.pptx
The Codex of Business Writing Software for Real-World Solutions 2.pptxMalak Abu Hammad
 
Tech-Forward - Achieving Business Readiness For Copilot in Microsoft 365
Tech-Forward - Achieving Business Readiness For Copilot in Microsoft 365Tech-Forward - Achieving Business Readiness For Copilot in Microsoft 365
Tech-Forward - Achieving Business Readiness For Copilot in Microsoft 3652toLead Limited
 
Pigging Solutions Piggable Sweeping Elbows
Pigging Solutions Piggable Sweeping ElbowsPigging Solutions Piggable Sweeping Elbows
Pigging Solutions Piggable Sweeping ElbowsPigging Solutions
 
CloudStudio User manual (basic edition):
CloudStudio User manual (basic edition):CloudStudio User manual (basic edition):
CloudStudio User manual (basic edition):comworks
 
How to Remove Document Management Hurdles with X-Docs?
How to Remove Document Management Hurdles with X-Docs?How to Remove Document Management Hurdles with X-Docs?
How to Remove Document Management Hurdles with X-Docs?XfilesPro
 
Transforming Data Streams with Kafka Connect: An Introduction to Single Messa...
Transforming Data Streams with Kafka Connect: An Introduction to Single Messa...Transforming Data Streams with Kafka Connect: An Introduction to Single Messa...
Transforming Data Streams with Kafka Connect: An Introduction to Single Messa...HostedbyConfluent
 
SIEMENS: RAPUNZEL – A Tale About Knowledge Graph
SIEMENS: RAPUNZEL – A Tale About Knowledge GraphSIEMENS: RAPUNZEL – A Tale About Knowledge Graph
SIEMENS: RAPUNZEL – A Tale About Knowledge GraphNeo4j
 
Advanced Test Driven-Development @ php[tek] 2024
Advanced Test Driven-Development @ php[tek] 2024Advanced Test Driven-Development @ php[tek] 2024
Advanced Test Driven-Development @ php[tek] 2024Scott Keck-Warren
 
WhatsApp 9892124323 ✓Call Girls In Kalyan ( Mumbai ) secure service
WhatsApp 9892124323 ✓Call Girls In Kalyan ( Mumbai ) secure serviceWhatsApp 9892124323 ✓Call Girls In Kalyan ( Mumbai ) secure service
WhatsApp 9892124323 ✓Call Girls In Kalyan ( Mumbai ) secure servicePooja Nehwal
 
Pigging Solutions in Pet Food Manufacturing
Pigging Solutions in Pet Food ManufacturingPigging Solutions in Pet Food Manufacturing
Pigging Solutions in Pet Food ManufacturingPigging Solutions
 
#StandardsGoals for 2024: What’s new for BISAC - Tech Forum 2024
#StandardsGoals for 2024: What’s new for BISAC - Tech Forum 2024#StandardsGoals for 2024: What’s new for BISAC - Tech Forum 2024
#StandardsGoals for 2024: What’s new for BISAC - Tech Forum 2024BookNet Canada
 
Kotlin Multiplatform & Compose Multiplatform - Starter kit for pragmatics
Kotlin Multiplatform & Compose Multiplatform - Starter kit for pragmaticsKotlin Multiplatform & Compose Multiplatform - Starter kit for pragmatics
Kotlin Multiplatform & Compose Multiplatform - Starter kit for pragmaticscarlostorres15106
 
Neo4j - How KGs are shaping the future of Generative AI at AWS Summit London ...
Neo4j - How KGs are shaping the future of Generative AI at AWS Summit London ...Neo4j - How KGs are shaping the future of Generative AI at AWS Summit London ...
Neo4j - How KGs are shaping the future of Generative AI at AWS Summit London ...Neo4j
 
Benefits Of Flutter Compared To Other Frameworks
Benefits Of Flutter Compared To Other FrameworksBenefits Of Flutter Compared To Other Frameworks
Benefits Of Flutter Compared To Other FrameworksSoftradix Technologies
 
08448380779 Call Girls In Greater Kailash - I Women Seeking Men
08448380779 Call Girls In Greater Kailash - I Women Seeking Men08448380779 Call Girls In Greater Kailash - I Women Seeking Men
08448380779 Call Girls In Greater Kailash - I Women Seeking MenDelhi Call girls
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Injustice - Developers Among Us (SciFiDevCon 2024)
Injustice - Developers Among Us (SciFiDevCon 2024)Injustice - Developers Among Us (SciFiDevCon 2024)
Injustice - Developers Among Us (SciFiDevCon 2024)
 
08448380779 Call Girls In Friends Colony Women Seeking Men
08448380779 Call Girls In Friends Colony Women Seeking Men08448380779 Call Girls In Friends Colony Women Seeking Men
08448380779 Call Girls In Friends Colony Women Seeking Men
 
Unblocking The Main Thread Solving ANRs and Frozen Frames
Unblocking The Main Thread Solving ANRs and Frozen FramesUnblocking The Main Thread Solving ANRs and Frozen Frames
Unblocking The Main Thread Solving ANRs and Frozen Frames
 
The Codex of Business Writing Software for Real-World Solutions 2.pptx
The Codex of Business Writing Software for Real-World Solutions 2.pptxThe Codex of Business Writing Software for Real-World Solutions 2.pptx
The Codex of Business Writing Software for Real-World Solutions 2.pptx
 
Tech-Forward - Achieving Business Readiness For Copilot in Microsoft 365
Tech-Forward - Achieving Business Readiness For Copilot in Microsoft 365Tech-Forward - Achieving Business Readiness For Copilot in Microsoft 365
Tech-Forward - Achieving Business Readiness For Copilot in Microsoft 365
 
Pigging Solutions Piggable Sweeping Elbows
Pigging Solutions Piggable Sweeping ElbowsPigging Solutions Piggable Sweeping Elbows
Pigging Solutions Piggable Sweeping Elbows
 
CloudStudio User manual (basic edition):
CloudStudio User manual (basic edition):CloudStudio User manual (basic edition):
CloudStudio User manual (basic edition):
 
How to Remove Document Management Hurdles with X-Docs?
How to Remove Document Management Hurdles with X-Docs?How to Remove Document Management Hurdles with X-Docs?
How to Remove Document Management Hurdles with X-Docs?
 
Transforming Data Streams with Kafka Connect: An Introduction to Single Messa...
Transforming Data Streams with Kafka Connect: An Introduction to Single Messa...Transforming Data Streams with Kafka Connect: An Introduction to Single Messa...
Transforming Data Streams with Kafka Connect: An Introduction to Single Messa...
 
SIEMENS: RAPUNZEL – A Tale About Knowledge Graph
SIEMENS: RAPUNZEL – A Tale About Knowledge GraphSIEMENS: RAPUNZEL – A Tale About Knowledge Graph
SIEMENS: RAPUNZEL – A Tale About Knowledge Graph
 
Advanced Test Driven-Development @ php[tek] 2024
Advanced Test Driven-Development @ php[tek] 2024Advanced Test Driven-Development @ php[tek] 2024
Advanced Test Driven-Development @ php[tek] 2024
 
WhatsApp 9892124323 ✓Call Girls In Kalyan ( Mumbai ) secure service
WhatsApp 9892124323 ✓Call Girls In Kalyan ( Mumbai ) secure serviceWhatsApp 9892124323 ✓Call Girls In Kalyan ( Mumbai ) secure service
WhatsApp 9892124323 ✓Call Girls In Kalyan ( Mumbai ) secure service
 
Pigging Solutions in Pet Food Manufacturing
Pigging Solutions in Pet Food ManufacturingPigging Solutions in Pet Food Manufacturing
Pigging Solutions in Pet Food Manufacturing
 
#StandardsGoals for 2024: What’s new for BISAC - Tech Forum 2024
#StandardsGoals for 2024: What’s new for BISAC - Tech Forum 2024#StandardsGoals for 2024: What’s new for BISAC - Tech Forum 2024
#StandardsGoals for 2024: What’s new for BISAC - Tech Forum 2024
 
Kotlin Multiplatform & Compose Multiplatform - Starter kit for pragmatics
Kotlin Multiplatform & Compose Multiplatform - Starter kit for pragmaticsKotlin Multiplatform & Compose Multiplatform - Starter kit for pragmatics
Kotlin Multiplatform & Compose Multiplatform - Starter kit for pragmatics
 
The transition to renewables in India.pdf
The transition to renewables in India.pdfThe transition to renewables in India.pdf
The transition to renewables in India.pdf
 
Neo4j - How KGs are shaping the future of Generative AI at AWS Summit London ...
Neo4j - How KGs are shaping the future of Generative AI at AWS Summit London ...Neo4j - How KGs are shaping the future of Generative AI at AWS Summit London ...
Neo4j - How KGs are shaping the future of Generative AI at AWS Summit London ...
 
Benefits Of Flutter Compared To Other Frameworks
Benefits Of Flutter Compared To Other FrameworksBenefits Of Flutter Compared To Other Frameworks
Benefits Of Flutter Compared To Other Frameworks
 
Vulnerability_Management_GRC_by Sohang Sengupta.pptx
Vulnerability_Management_GRC_by Sohang Sengupta.pptxVulnerability_Management_GRC_by Sohang Sengupta.pptx
Vulnerability_Management_GRC_by Sohang Sengupta.pptx
 
08448380779 Call Girls In Greater Kailash - I Women Seeking Men
08448380779 Call Girls In Greater Kailash - I Women Seeking Men08448380779 Call Girls In Greater Kailash - I Women Seeking Men
08448380779 Call Girls In Greater Kailash - I Women Seeking Men
 

20161130 Booosting Circular Demolition Erasmus MC - Presentation Pieter Beurskens UT

  • 1. - 1 - Pieter Beurskens PhD Researcher - University of Twente “Development of a Reuse Potential tool” Date 30 November 2016 Erasmus MC building H, HE & HS (2005) (2005) (1958)
  • 2. - 2 - Content 1. Introduction reuse potential 2.1 Introduction Building He, Hs 2.2 Examine Reuse potential - Building Hs 3.1 Introduction Building H (Dijkzicht) 3.2 Examine reuse potential - Facade building H 4. Workshop
  • 3. - 3 - Reuse potential TRANSFORMATION CAPACITY REUSEPOTENTIAL Identification of • Economic impact • Environmental impact Integration RP tool in BIM Durmisevic, 2006
  • 4. - 4 - Erasmus building He, Hs (2005) Erasmus building He, Hs, Rotterdam, Netherlands
  • 5. - 5 - Erasmus building He, Hs (2005) Erasmus building He, Hs, Rotterdam, Netherlands 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th -1st He Hs
  • 6. - 6 - Erasmus building He, Hs, Rotterdam, Netherlands Erasmus building He, Hs (2005) 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th -1st Hs He
  • 7. - 7 - Erasmus building Hs (2005) toilet group installations stairs lift stairs Legend structure wind brace floor plan - 4th floor
  • 8. - 8 - toilet group installations stairs lift stairs Legend structure wind brace facade floor plan - 4th floor Erasmus building Hs (2005) 6m
  • 9. - 9 - Legend +++ structure wind brace water supply water drainage heating Erasmus building Hs (2005)
  • 10. - 10 - Erasmus building Hs (2005) Legend structure wind brace cable tray (electra + data) cable gutter
  • 11. - 11 - Erasmus building Hs (2005) Legend structure wind brace air supply return air
  • 12. - 12 - +++ Legend structure wind brace water supply water drainage heating cable tray (electra + data) cable gutter air supply return air Erasmus building Hs (2005)
  • 13. - 13 - Examine reuse potential - Building Hs
  • 14. - 14 - Examine reuse potential - Building Hs TRANSFORMATION CAPACITY REUSEPOTENTIAL Durmisevic, 2006
  • 15. - 15 - Examine reuse potential - Building Hs Transformable Building StructuresChapter 5 choose demolition instead of disassembly. This brings into focus two-stage assembly and disassembly. First, at the building site, where higher-level sub- assemblies like systems and components are replaced for reuse/reconfiguration, and secondly in the factory, where lower levels subassemblies, such as sub- components and elements, are disassembled and replaced for reuse/ reconfiguration/recycling. Figure 5.09 shows four types of building configuration distinguished by the number of on-site assembly/disassembly operations. The problem of coordination between different components and their assembly/disassembly operations grows along this systematization from 1 to 4. For example, a façade system can be structured following the pattern of functional decomposition, into sub-functions such as: enclosing, finishing, isolating, water protecting, and load bearing. Sub-functions can be allocated through independent elements arranged into components, to form a particular façade system (Figure 5.10 right). These components are materialisations of sub-functions. In this way, the façade system is composed of components that can have different use and technical life cycles. This makes the façade system flexible, because it can be easily modified, according to new requirements regarding light, insulation, position of openings, etc. At the same time, components can be reused in other situations, reconfigured or recycled. Development of such systems takes into account both structure and material levels choose demolition instead of disassembly. This brings into focus two-stage assembly and disassembly. First, at the building site, where higher-level sub- assemblies like systems and components are replaced for reuse/reconfiguration, and secondly in the factory, where lower levels subassemblies, such as sub- components and elements, are disassembled and replaced for reuse/ reconfiguration/recycling. Figure 5.09 shows four types of building configuration distinguished by the number of on-site assembly/disassembly operations. The problem of coordination between different components and their assembly/disassembly operations grows along this systematization from 1 to 4. For example, a façade system can be structured following the pattern of functional decomposition, into sub-functions such as: enclosing, finishing, isolating, water protecting, and load bearing. Sub-functions can be allocated through independent elements arranged into components, to form a particular façade system (Figure 5.10 right). These components are materialisations of sub-functions. In this way, the façade system is composed of components that can have different use and technical life cycles. This makes the façade system flexible, because it can be easily modified, according to new requirements regarding light, insulation, position of openings, etc. At the same time, components can be reused in other situations, reconfigured or recycled. Development of such systems takes into account both short-term strategies related to adaptation for future use, and a long-term strategy related to the most beneficial end-of-life building component scenario. Houwever, if there is no clustering with respect to systems sub-functions than most of systems sub-functions are integrated into one composite component. Figure 5.10 left illustrates such a system, where the load-bearing functions, light openings, and subdivision of openings are combined into one material level. This system has been developed for construction of a number of housing towers in Hong Kong. Such a system structuring lacks transformational capacity and cannot be adapted to different use requirements. At the end of a system’s service life, the only end-of- life scenario is demolition and down-cycling of material. Figure 5.09: Four types of building configuration distinguished by the number of on-site assembly/disassembly operations. choose demolition instead of disassembly. This brings into focus two-stage assembly and disassembly. First, at the building site, where higher-level sub- assemblies like systems and components are replaced for reuse/reconfiguration, and secondly in the factory, where lower levels subassemblies, such as sub- components and elements, are disassembled and replaced for reuse/ reconfiguration/recycling. Figure 5.09 shows four types of building configuration distinguished by the number of on-site assembly/disassembly operations. The problem of coordination between different components and their assembly/disassembly operations grows along this systematization from 1 to 4. For example, a façade system can be structured following the pattern of functional decomposition, into sub-functions such as: enclosing, finishing, isolating, water protecting, and load bearing. Sub-functions can be allocated through independent elements arranged into components, to form a particular façade system (Figure 5.10 right). These components are materialisations of sub-functions. In this way, the façade system is composed of components that can have different use and technical life cycles. This makes the façade system flexible, because it can be easily modified, according to new requirements regarding light, insulation, position of openings, etc. At the same time, components can be reused in other situations, reconfigured or recycled. Development of such systems takes into account both short-term strategies related to adaptation for future use, and a long-term strategy related to the most beneficial end-of-life building component scenario. Houwever, if there is no clustering with respect to systems sub-functions than most of systems sub-functions are integrated into one composite component. Figure 5.10 left illustrates such a system, where the load-bearing functions, light openings, and subdivision of openings are combined into one material level. This system has been developed for construction of a number of housing towers in Hong Kong. Such a system structuring lacks transformational capacity and cannot be adapted to different use requirements. At the end of a system’s service life, the only end-of- life scenario is demolition and down-cycling of material. Figure 5.09: Four types of building configuration distinguished by the number of on-site assembly/disassembly operations. Transformable Building StructuresChapter 5 choose demolition instead of disassembly. This brings into focus two-stage assembly and disassembly. First, at the building site, where higher-level sub- assemblies like systems and components are replaced for reuse/reconfiguration, and secondly in the factory, where lower levels subassemblies, such as sub- components and elements, are disassembled and replaced for reuse/ reconfiguration/recycling. Figure 5.09 shows four types of building configuration distinguished by the number of on-site assembly/disassembly operations. The problem of coordination between different components and their assembly/disassembly operations grows along this systematization from 1 to 4. For example, a façade system can be structured following the pattern of functional decomposition, into sub-functions such as: enclosing, finishing, isolating, water protecting, and load bearing. Sub-functions can be allocated through independent elements arranged into components, to form a particular façade system (Figure 5.10 right). These components are materialisations of sub-functions. In this way, the façade system is composed of components that can have different use and technical life cycles. This makes the façade system flexible, because it can be easily modified, according to new requirements regarding light, insulation, position of openings, etc. At the same time, components can be reused in other situations, reconfigured or recycled. Development of such systems takes into account both Assessment 1. components 1,0 2. elements/ components 0,8 3. elements 0,6 4. material/ element/ component 0,4 5. material/ element 0,2 6. material 0,1 installations Floor level + 2700 installations
  • 16. - 16 - Examine reuse potential - Building Hs Load bearing 5. material/ element 0,2 Enclosure 2. elements/ components 0,8 Infill 3. elements 0,6 Service 3. element 0,6 structure and material levels Assessment 1. components 1,0 2. elements/ components 0,8 3. elements 0,6 4. material/ element/ component 0,4 5. material/ element 0,2 6. material 0,1 installations Floor level + 2700 installations 1.00 St Co +2.10 3.01 M St 3.02 Pl fi Infill 3.04 LCF 3.05 LCP elements 3.02 I Insu Service 4.03 S HD 4.04 S VD 4.06 S WD 4.01 S CD 4.02 Ca G 4.04 Radtr elements 1.01 St Be 1.05 Pr Bo 1.06 Co St Load bearing 1.04 St Fi elements materials 1.03 An Fl 1.03 IC Fl 1.02 Co Fl 1.00 St Co 2.10 La FF 2.13 SFF 2.11 Wi Fr 2.14 Ex Fi 2.12 In Fi 2.00 La FF 2.03 SFF 2.01 Wi Fr 2.04 Ex Fi 2.02 In Fi 2.06 Ex Fi +2.00 La FF -2.03 SFF +2.10 La FF -2.13 SFF 3.01 M St 3.02 Pl fi 2.15 So Sh Infill Enclosure 3.04 LCF 3.05 LCP sub-systems components elements elements 3.02 I Insu Service 4.03 S HD 4.04 S VD 4.06 S WD 4.01 S CD 4.02 Ca G 4.04 Radtr elements 2.05 So Sh 1.01 St Be 1.05 Pr Bo 1.06 Co St Load bearing 1.04 St Fi elements materials 1.03 An Fl 1.03 IC Fl 1.02 Co Fl 1.00 St Co 2.10 La FF 2.13 SFF 2.11 Wi Fr 2.14 Ex Fi 2.12 In Fi 2.00 La FF 2.03 SFF 2.01 Wi Fr 2.04 Ex Fi 2.02 In Fi 2.06 Ex Fi +2.00 La FF -2.03 SFF +2.10 La FF -2.13 SFF 3.01 M St 3.02 Pl fi 2.15 So Sh Infill Enclosure 3.04 LCF 3.05 LCP sub-systems components elements elements 3.02 I Insu Service 4.03 S HD 4.04 S VD 4.06 S WD 4.01 S CD 4.02 Ca G 4.04 Radtr elements 2.05 So Sh 1.01 St Be 1.05 Pr Bo 1.06 Co St Load bearing 1.04 St Fi elements materials 1.03 An Fl 1.03 IC Fl 1.02 Co Fl 2.10 La FF 2.13 SFF 2.11 Wi Fr 2.14 Ex Fi 2.12 In Fi 2.00 La FF 2.03 SFF 2.01 Wi Fr 2.04 Ex Fi 2.02 In Fi 2.06 Ex Fi +2.00 La FF -2.03 SFF +2.10 La FF -2.13 SFF 3.01 M St 3.02 Pl fi 2.15 So Sh Infill Enclosure 3.04 LCF 3.05 LCP sub-systems components elements elements 3.02 I Insu Service 4.03 S HD 4.04 S VD 4.06 S WD 4.01 S CD 4.02 Ca G 4.04 Radtr elements 2.05 So Sh Co St materials 1.03 An Fl 1.03 IC Fl
  • 17. - 17 - relational pattern Assessment 1. vertical 1,0 2. horizontal in lower zone at the diagram 0,6 3. horizontal between upper and lower zone 0,4 4. horizontal in upper zone 0,1 Examine reuse potential - Building Hs Transformable Building Structures Horizontal relations in Figure 5.1 wall, electrical installation, and surrounding elements would be vertical relational diagram that wall systems, which have a gre 5.3.3 Base element specifica Figure 5.15: type of configuration as result of the position of relations between the functional groups. Horizontal relations are common in static configurations, vertical relations are common in dynamic configurations. The figure represents static, partly dynamic and dynamic configurations of three wall systems. Functional decomposition Teschnicladecomposition Fun A B Transformable Building Structures Chapter 5 Horizontal relations in Figure 5.15 Aillustrate dependencies between the separation wall, electrical installation, and finishing. If one element needs to be replaced, all surrounding elements would be damaged. Figure 5.15 B and C illustrate more vertical relational diagram that represents a partially open and open hierarchy of wall systems, which have a greater transformational capacity. 5.3.3 Base element specification Figure 5.15: type of configuration as result of the position of relations between the functional groups. Horizontal relations are common in static configurations, vertical relations are common in dynamic configurations. The figure represents static, partly dynamic and dynamic configurations of three wall systems. Functional decomposition Teschnicladecomposition Functional decomposition Functional decomposition A B C Transformable Building Structures Chapter 5 Horizontal relations in Figure 5.15 Aillustrate dependencies between the separation wall, electrical installation, and finishing. If one element needs to be replaced, all surrounding elements would be damaged. Figure 5.15 B and C illustrate more vertical relational diagram that represents a partially open and open hierarchy of wall systems, which have a greater transformational capacity. 5.3.3 Base element specification Figure 5.15: type of configuration as result of the position of relations between the functional groups. Horizontal relations are common in static configurations, vertical relations are common in dynamic configurations. The figure represents static, partly dynamic and dynamic configurations of three wall systems. Functional decomposition Teschnicladecomposition Functional decomposition Functional decomposition A B C 4.3.1. installations Floor level + 2700 installations Functional decomposition Technicaldecomposition Functional decomposition Technicaldecomposition Functional decomposition Technicaldecomposition
  • 18. - 18 - installations Floor level + 2700 installations relational pattern Examine reuse potential - Building Hs 1.00 St Co 1.01 St Be 1.05 Pr Bo 2.10 La FF 2.13 SFF 2.11 Wi Fr 2.14 Ex Fi 2.12 In Fi 2.00 La FF 2.03 SFF 2.01 Wi Fr 2.04 Ex Fi 2.02 In Fi 2.06 Ex Fi +2.00 La FF -2.03 SFF +2.10 La FF -2.13 SFF 1.06 Co St 3.01 M St 3.02 Pl fi 2.15 So Sh Infill Enclosure Load bearing 3.04 LCF 3.05 LCP sub-systems components elements elements 3.02 I Insu Service 4.03 S HD 4.04 S VD 4.06 S WD 4.01 S CD 4.02 Ca G 4.04 Radtr elements 2.05 So Sh elements materials 1.03 An Fl 1.03 IC Fl 1.02 Co Fl vertical connections horizontal connections Type of connection 1.04 St Fi building level 0,4 Assessment 1. vertical 1,0 2. horizontal in lower zone at the diagram 0,6 3. horizontal between upper and lower zone 0,4 4. horizontal in upper zone 0,1 1.01 St Be 2.10 La FF 2.13 SFF 2.11 Wi Fr 2.14 Ex Fi 2.12 In Fi 2.00 La FF 2.03 SFF 2.01 Wi Fr 2.04 Ex Fi 2.02 In Fi 2.06 Ex Fi +2.00 La FF -2.03 SFF +2.10 La FF -2.13 SFF 3.01 M St 3.02 Pl fi 2.15 So Sh Infill Enclosure 3.04 LCF 3.05 LCP sub-systems components elements elements 3.02 I Insu 2.05 So Sh elements materials 1.03 An Fl 1.03 IC Fl 1.02 Co Fl vertical connections horizontal connections Type of connection 1.04 St Fi
  • 19. - 19 - installations Floor level + 2700 installations relational pattern Assessment 1. vertical 1,0 2. horizontal in lower zone at the diagram 0,6 3. horizontal between upper and lower zone 0,4 4. horizontal in upper zone 0,1 Examine reuse potential - Building Hs system level 1.00 St Co 3.01 M St Infill 3.04 LCF elements Service 4.03 S HD 4.04 S VD 4.06 S WD 4.01 S CD 4.02 elements 1.01 St Be 1.05 Pr Bo 1.06 Co St Load bearing 1.04 St Fi elements materials 1.03 An Fl 1.03 IC Fl 1.02 Co Fl 2.10 La FF 2.13 SFF 2.11 Wi Fr 2.14 Ex Fi 2.12 In Fi 2.00 La FF 2.03 SFF 2.01 Wi Fr 2.04 Ex Fi 2.02 In Fi 2.06 Ex Fi +2.00 La FF -2.03 SFF +2.10 La FF -2.13 SFF 2.15 So Sh Enclosure sub-systems components elements elements 3 I 2.05 So Sh Load bearing 3. horizontal between upper and lower zone 0,4 Enclosure 2. horizontal in lower zone at the diagram 0,6 1.01 St Be 2.10 La FF 2.13 SFF 2.11 Wi Fr 2.14 Ex Fi 2.12 In Fi 2.00 La FF 2.03 SFF 2.01 Wi Fr 2.04 Ex Fi 2.02 In Fi 2.06 Ex Fi +2.00 La FF -2.03 SFF +2.10 La FF -2.13 SFF 3.01 M St 3.02 Pl fi 2.15 So Sh Infill Enclosure 3.04 LCF 3.05 LCP sub-systems components elements elements 3.02 I Insu 2.05 So Sh elements materials 1.03 An Fl 1.03 IC Fl 1.02 Co Fl vertical connections horizontal connections Type of connection 1.04 St Fi
  • 20. - 20 - Examine reuse potential - Building Hs base element specification Assessment 1. base element - intermediary between systems/compo- nents 1,0 2. base element on two levels 0,6 3. element with two functions (base element + function) 0,4 4. no base element 0,1 176 TraChapter 5 Figure 5.16 shows four principles of defining the façade and the role that specification of a base element can have on decomposition of a façade element. Principle 1 in Figure 5.16 is based on the assumption that building parts are assembled on site. In this principle, elements, which according to their functionality belong to the functional assembly of the façade (f1), have direct relations with other functional assemblies (load-bearing construction) (f2). Column (a) has the function of the base element for all elements in assembly, and therefore has connections with them all. In principle 2, two functions (f1, f2) are clustered into one component. The wooden frame (b) is the base element for the façade assembly, and at the same time has a load bearing function in the building. This makes the construction process simpler, however, change of one façade panel would have consequences for the stability of the total structure. Principle 3 shows an independent assembly of two independent functions (f1, f2). Elements assembled as façade (b, b1, b2, b3) are clustered into one component, where the wooden frame (b) is chosen as the base element. The load-bearing function (a) is taken out and defined as an independent assembly. In this case, the load bearing elements act as a frame for the whole building and the wooden frame b is the base for the façade assembly. This serves as an intermediary between the load bearing assembly and independent elements of the façade. installations Floor level + 2700 installations 1.00 St Co 3.01 M St Infill 3.04 LCF Service 4.04 S VD 4.06 S WD 4.01 1.01 St Be 1.05 Pr Bo 1.06 Co St Load bearing elements materials 1.03 An Fl 1.03 IC Fl 1.02 Co Fl 1.02 Co Fl 1.04 St Fi Building level Load bearing 1. base element B-level 1,0
  • 21. - 21 - Examine reuse potential - Building Hs base element specification Assessment 1. base element - intermediary between systems/compo- nents 1,0 2. base element on two levels 0,6 3. element with two functions (base element + function) 0,4 4. no base element 0,1 176 TraChapter 5 Figure 5.16 shows four principles of defining the façade and the role that specification of a base element can have on decomposition of a façade element. Principle 1 in Figure 5.16 is based on the assumption that building parts are assembled on site. In this principle, elements, which according to their functionality belong to the functional assembly of the façade (f1), have direct relations with other functional assemblies (load-bearing construction) (f2). Column (a) has the function of the base element for all elements in assembly, and therefore has connections with them all. In principle 2, two functions (f1, f2) are clustered into one component. The wooden frame (b) is the base element for the façade assembly, and at the same time has a load bearing function in the building. This makes the construction process simpler, however, change of one façade panel would have consequences for the stability of the total structure. Principle 3 shows an independent assembly of two independent functions (f1, f2). Elements assembled as façade (b, b1, b2, b3) are clustered into one component, where the wooden frame (b) is chosen as the base element. The load-bearing function (a) is taken out and defined as an independent assembly. In this case, the load bearing elements act as a frame for the whole building and the wooden frame b is the base for the façade assembly. This serves as an intermediary between the load bearing assembly and independent elements of the façade. installations Floor level + 2700 installations 2.10 La FF 2.13 SFF 2.11 Wi Fr 2.14 Ex Fi 2.12 In Fi 2.00 La FF 2.03 SFF 2.01 Wi Fr 2.04 Ex Fi 2.02 In Fi 2.06 Ex Fi +2.00 La FF -2.03 SFF +2.10 La FF -2.13 SFF 3.01 M St 3.02 Pl fi 2.15 So Sh Infill Enclosure 3.04 LCF 3.05 LCP sub-systems components elements elements 3.02 I Insu Service 4.0 S H 4.04 S VD 4.06 S WD 4.01 S CD 4.02 Ca G 4.0 Rad elements 2.05 So Sh system level Load bearing 1. base element B-level 1,0 Enclosure 1. base element S-level 1,0
  • 22. - 22 - Examine reuse potential - Building Hs base element specification Assessment 1. base element - intermediary between systems/compo- nents 1,0 2. base element on two levels 0,6 3. element with two functions (base element + function) 0,4 4. no base element 0,1 176 TraChapter 5 Figure 5.16 shows four principles of defining the façade and the role that specification of a base element can have on decomposition of a façade element. Principle 1 in Figure 5.16 is based on the assumption that building parts are assembled on site. In this principle, elements, which according to their functionality belong to the functional assembly of the façade (f1), have direct relations with other functional assemblies (load-bearing construction) (f2). Column (a) has the function of the base element for all elements in assembly, and therefore has connections with them all. In principle 2, two functions (f1, f2) are clustered into one component. The wooden frame (b) is the base element for the façade assembly, and at the same time has a load bearing function in the building. This makes the construction process simpler, however, change of one façade panel would have consequences for the stability of the total structure. Principle 3 shows an independent assembly of two independent functions (f1, f2). Elements assembled as façade (b, b1, b2, b3) are clustered into one component, where the wooden frame (b) is chosen as the base element. The load-bearing function (a) is taken out and defined as an independent assembly. In this case, the load bearing elements act as a frame for the whole building and the wooden frame b is the base for the façade assembly. This serves as an intermediary between the load bearing assembly and independent elements of the façade. installations Floor level + 2700 installations sub-system level Load bearing 1. base element B-level 1,0 Enclosure 1. base element S-level 1,0 Enclosure 1. base element SS-level 4x 1,0 2. base el. two lvls SS-level 3x 0,6 Total enclosure SS-level 0,83 1.00 St Co 1.01 St Be 1.05 Pr Bo 2.10 La FF 2.13 SFF 2.11 Wi Fr 2.14 Ex Fi 2.12 In Fi 2.00 La FF 2.03 SFF 2.01 Wi Fr 2.04 Ex Fi 2.02 In Fi 2.06 Ex Fi +2.00 La FF -2.03 SFF +2.10 La FF -2.13 SFF 1.06 Co St 3.01 M St 3.02 Pl fi 2.15 So Sh Infill Enclosure Load bearing 3.04 LCF 3.05 LCP sub-systems components elements elements 3.02 I Insu Service 4.03 S HD 4.04 S VD 4.06 S WD 4.01 S CD 4.02 Ca G 4.04 Radtr elements 2.05 So Sh elements materials 1.03 An Fl 1.03 IC Fl 1.02 Co Fl 1.04 St Fi
  • 23. - 23 - standardization of product edge Assessment 1. pre-made geometry 1,0 2. half standardized geometry 0,5 3. geometry made on construction site 0,1 Examine reuse potential - Building Hs installations Floor level + 2700 installations Load bearing average 0,71 Enclosure average 0,94 Infill average 0,6 Service average 0,58 1.00 St Co +2.10 3.01 M St 3.02 Pl fi Infill 3.04 LCF 3.05 LCP elements 3.02 I Insu Service 4.03 S HD 4.04 S VD 4.06 S WD 4.01 S CD 4.02 Ca G 4.04 Radtr elements 1.01 St Be 1.05 Pr Bo 1.06 Co St Load bearing elements materials 1.03 An Fl 1.03 IC Fl 1.02 Co Fl 1,0 metry 0,5 e 0,1 1.04 St Fi 1.00 St Co 2.10 La FF 2.13 SFF 2.11 Wi Fr 2.14 Ex Fi 2.12 In Fi 2.00 La FF 2.03 SFF 2.01 Wi Fr 2.04 Ex Fi 2.02 In Fi 2.06 Ex Fi +2.00 La FF -2.03 SFF +2.10 La FF -2.13 SFF 3.01 M St 3.02 Pl fi 2.15 So Sh Infill Enclosure 3.04 LCF 3.05 LCP sub-systems components elements elements 3.02 I Insu Service 4.03 S HD 4.04 S VD 4.06 S WD 4.01 S CD 4.02 Ca G 4.04 Radtr elements 2.05 So Sh 1.01 St Be 1.05 Pr Bo 1.06 Co St Load bearing elements materials 1.03 An Fl 1.03 IC Fl 1.02 Co Fl 1. Pre-made geometry 1,0 2. half standardized geometry 0,5 3. Geometry made on site 0,1 Assessment 1.04 St Fi 1.00 St Co 2.10 La FF 2.13 SFF 2.11 Wi Fr 2.14 Ex Fi 2.12 In Fi 2.00 La FF 2.03 SFF 2.01 Wi Fr 2.04 Ex Fi 2.02 In Fi 2.06 Ex Fi +2.00 La FF -2.03 SFF +2.10 La FF -2.13 SFF 3.01 M St 3.02 Pl fi 2.15 So Sh Infill Enclosure 3.04 LCF 3.05 LCP sub-systems components elements elements 3.02 I Insu Service 4.03 S HD 4.04 S VD 4.06 S WD 4.01 S CD 4.02 Ca G 4.04 Radtr elements 2.05 So Sh 1.01 St Be 1.05 Pr Bo 1.06 Co St Load bearing elements materials 1.03 An Fl 1.03 IC Fl 1.02 Co Fl 1. Pre-made geometry 1,0 2. half standardized geometry 0,5 3. Geometry made on site 0,1 Assessment 1.04 St Fi 2.10 La FF 2.13 SFF 2.11 Wi Fr 2.14 Ex Fi 2.12 In Fi 2.00 La FF 2.03 SFF 2.01 Wi Fr 2.04 Ex Fi 2.02 In Fi 2.06 Ex Fi +2.00 La FF -2.03 SFF +2.10 La FF -2.13 SFF 3.01 M St 3.02 Pl fi 2.15 So Sh Infill Enclosure 3.04 LCF 3.05 LCP sub-systems components elements elements 3.02 I Insu Service 4.03 S HD 4.04 S VD 4.06 S WD 4.01 S CD 4.02 Ca G 4.04 Radtr elements 2.05 So Sh Co St materials 1.03 An Fl 1.03 IC Fl 2. half standardized geometry 0,5 3. Geometry made on site 0,1 Infill Loa bear elements materials 1.03 An Fl 1 IC 1 C 1. Pre-made geometry 1,0 2. half standardized geometry 0,5 3. Geometry made on site 0,1 Assessment
  • 24. - 24 - assembly direction Examine reuse potential - Building Hs 181 Figure 5.20: Five assembly relations play a role in typology of the configurations. Distinction is based on the assembly direction. installations Floor level + 2700 installations Transformable Building Structures Chapter 5 Figure 5.20: Five assembly relations play a role in typology of the configurations. Distinction is based on the assembly direction.
  • 25. assembly direction - 25 - installations Floor level + 2700 installations Step 2 Step 1 Step 3 Step 4 Step 5 Step 6 Step 7 Step 8 Step 9 Assemblysequences Step 10 Step 11 Step 12 Step 13 Step 14 Examine reuse potential - Building Hs
  • 26. assembly direction - 26 - installations Floor level + 2700 installations Step 2 Step 1 Step 3 Step 4 Step 5 Step 6 Step 7 Step 8 Step 9 Assemblysequences Step 10 Step 11 Step 12 Step 13 Step 14 E1 E1 steel structure Examine reuse potential - Building Hs
  • 27. assembly direction - 27 - installations Floor level + 2700 installations Step 2 Step 1 Step 3 Step 4 Step 5 Step 6 Step 7 Step 8 Step 9 Assemblysequences Step 10 Step 11 Step 12 Step 13 Step 14 E2 E2 prefab concrete floorE1 E1 steel structure Examine reuse potential - Building Hs
  • 28. assembly direction - 28 - installations Floor level + 2700 installations Step 2 Step 1 Step 3 Step 4 Step 5 Step 6 Step 7 Step 8 Step 9 Assemblysequences Step 10 Step 11 Step 12 Step 13 Step 14 M3 M3 in-situ concrete floorE2 E2 prefab concrete floorE1 E1 steel structure Examine reuse potential - Building Hs
  • 29. - 29 - installations Floor level + 2700 installations Examine reuse potential - Building Hs Step 2 Step 1 Step 3 Step 4 Step 5 Step 6 Step 7 Step 8 Step 9 Assemblysequences Step 10 Step 11 Step 12 Step 13 Step 14 E23 E23 cable gutter E22 E22 lowered ceiling E21 E21 radiator E20 E20 installations (air distribution, electa & data distribution, water distribution) E19 E19 interior partitioning C18 C18 Solar shading E17 E17 wall finishE16 E16 exterior facade cladding panels E15 E15 windowsillE14 E14 cladding around window frameC13 C13 window frame E12 E12 wooden cladding suspension barE11 E11 Flashing profile M10 M10 anhydrite floor E9 facade connection E9 C8 C8 small facade frameC7 C7 main facade frame C6 C6 adjacent facade componentE5 E5 fire resistant material E4 E4 facade connection device M3 M3 in-situ concrete floorE2 E2 prefab concrete floorE1 E1 steel structure installations Floor level + 2700 installations assembly direction
  • 30. - 30 - Examine reuse potential - Building Hs installations Floor level + 2700 installations Main facade frame cluster Step 2 Step 1 Step 3 Step 4 Step 5 Step 6 Step 7 Step 8 Step 9 Assemblysequences Step 10 Step 11 Step 12 Step 13 Step 14 E23 E23 cable gutter E22 E22 lowered ceiling E21 E21 radiator E20 E20 installations (air distribution, electa & data distribution, water distribution) E19 E19 interior partitioning C18 C18 Solar shading E17 E17 wall finishE16 E16 exterior facade cladding panels E15 E15 windowsillE14 E14 cladding around window frameC13 C13 window frame E12 E12 wooden cladding suspension barE11 E11 Flashing profile M10 M10 anhydrite floor E9 facade connection E9 C8 C8 small facade frameC7 C7 main facade frame C6 C6 adjacent facade componentE5 E5 fire resistant material E4 E4 facade connection device M3 M3 in-situ concrete floorE2 E2 prefab concrete floorE1 E1 steel structure assembly direction
  • 31. - 31 - Examine reuse potential - Building Hs installations Floor level + 2700 installations Main facade frame cluster Step 13 Step 14 Step 12 Step 11 Step 10 Step 9 Step 8 Step 7 Step 6 Disassemblysequence Step 5 Step 4 Step 3 Step 2 Step 1 E23 E23 cable gutter E22 E22 lowered ceiling E21 E21 radiator E20 E20 installations (air distribution, electa & data distribution, water distribution) E19 E19 interior partitioning C18 C18 Solar shading E17 E17 wall finishE16 E16 exterior facade cladding panels E15 E15 windowsill E14 E14 cladding around window frame C13 C13 window frame E12 E12 wooden cladding suspension bar E11 E11 Flashing profile M10 M10 anhydrite floor E9 facade connection E9 C8 C8 small facade frame C7 C7 main facade frame C6 C6 adjacent facade componentE5 E5 fire resistant material E4 E4 facade connection device M3 M3 in-situ concrete floorE2 E2 prefab concrete floorE1 E1 steel structure assembly direction
  • 32. - 32 - Main facade frame cluster Step 13 Step 14 Step 12 Step 11 Step 10 Step 9 Step 8 Step 7 Step 6 Disassemblysequence Step 5 Step 4 Step 3 Step 2 Step 1 E23 E23 cable gutter E22 E22 lowered ceiling E21 E21 radiator E20 E20 installations (air distribution, electa & data distribution, water distribution) E19 E19 interior partitioning C18 C18 Solar shading E17 E17 wall finishE16 E16 exterior facade cladding panels E15 E15 windowsill E14 E14 cladding around window frame C13 C13 window frame E12 E12 wooden cladding suspension bar E11 E11 Flashing profile M10 M10 anhydrite floor E9 facade connection E9 C8 C8 small facade frame C7 C7 main facade frame C6 C6 adjacent facade componentE5 E5 fire resistant material E4 E4 facade connection device M3 M3 in-situ concrete floorE2 E2 prefab concrete floorE1 E1 steel structure Examine reuse potential - Building Hs installations Floor level + 2700 installationsinstallationsinstallations Floor level + 2700 assembly direction
  • 33. - 33 - Main facade frame cluster Step 13 Step 14 Step 12 Step 11 Step 10 Step 9 Step 8 Step 7 Step 6 Disassemblysequence Step 5 Step 4 Step 3 Step 2 Step 1 E23 E23 cable gutter E22 E22 lowered ceiling E21 E21 radiator E20 E20 installations (air distribution, electa & data distribution, water distribution) E19 E19 interior partitioning C18 C18 Solar shading E17 E17 wall finishE16 E16 exterior facade cladding panels E15 E15 windowsill E14 E14 cladding around window frame C13 C13 window frame E12 E12 wooden cladding suspension bar E11 E11 Flashing profile M10 M10 anhydrite floor E9 facade connection E9 C8 C8 small facade frame C7 C7 main facade frame C6 C6 adjacent facade componentE5 E5 fire resistant material E4 E4 facade connection device M3 M3 in-situ concrete floorE2 E2 prefab concrete floorE1 E1 steel structure Examine reuse potential - Building Hs installations Floor level + 2700 installationsinstallationsinstallations Floor level + 2700 assembly direction
  • 34. Assessment 1. gravity attractor 1,0 2. parrallel 0,6 3. semi-parralel 0,4 4. sequential 0,1 Enclosure 3. semi-parralel 0,4 - 34 - Examine reuse potential - Building Hs installations Floor level + 2700 installations cut loose cut loose Main facade frame cluster Step 13 Step 14 Step 12 Step 11 Step 10 Step 9 Step 8 Step 7 Step 6 Disassemblysequence Step 5 Step 4 Step 3 Step 2 Step 1 E23 E23 cable gutter E22 E22 lowered ceiling E21 E21 radiator E20 E20 installations (air distribution, electa & data distribution, water distribution) E19 E19 interior partitioning C18 C18 Solar shading E17 E17 wall finishE16 E16 exterior facade cladding panels E15 E15 windowsill E14 E14 cladding around window frame C13 C13 window frame E12 E12 wooden cladding suspension bar E11 E11 Flashing profile M10 M10 anhydrite floor E9 facade connection E9 C8 C8 small facade frame C7 C7 main facade frame C6 C6 adjacent facade componentE5 E5 fire resistant material E4 E4 facade connection device M3 M3 in-situ concrete floorE2 E2 prefab concrete floorE1 E1 steel structure assembly direction
  • 35. - 35 - Examine reuse potential - Building Hs functional dependence Chapter 5 Scenario 4: total separation or zoning Functional incorporation can also be shown using examples of façades. Often, relocation or resizing of façade openings has consequences on load bearing elements, or on the finishing of a façade. Portions of a brick façade as well as its inner wall may need to be demolished . 5.2.2 Systematisation 1 c - construction f - finishing s - servicing i - isolation4 2 3 total integration planned interpenetration unplanned interpenetration total seperation Functions within floor system: TraChapter 5 Scenario 4: total separation or zoning Functional incorporation can also be shown using examples of façades. Often, relocation or resizing of façade openings has consequences on load bearing elements, or on the finishing of a façade. Portions of a brick façade as well as its inner wall may need to be demolished . 1 c - construction f - finishing s - servicing i - isolation4 2 3 total integration planned interpenetration unplanned interpenetration total seperation Functions within a floor system: installations Floor level + 2700 installations Installations (air, electra & data and water distribution) - total seperation 1,0 Heating - planned interpenetration 0,8 Cable gutter - planned interpenetration 0,8 Assessment 1. modular zoning 1,0 2. planned interpenetration for different solutions 0,8 3. planned interpenetration for one solution 0,4 4. unplanned interpenetration 0,2 5. total dependency 0,1
  • 36. - 36 - type of connection Assessment Examine reuse potential - Building Hs 183 Transformable Building Structures Chapter 5 or can be connections between concrete floor panels, or bricks etc. Disassembly of such connections is often impossible, or it requires development of special deconstruction technologies as for example laser technologies. Type of connections is determined by type of material in connection, does it has accessory, type of accessory and position of accessory. Four basic displacements that together make all transformations in the structure are: elimination, addition, relocation, and substitution. The structure of a building or its parts can be transformed by elimination of an element. It can also be Direct chemical connection two elements are permanently fixed (no reuse, no recycling) direct connections between two pre-made components two elements are dependent in assembly/ disassembly (no component reuse) indirect connection with third chemical material two elements are connected permanently with third material (no reuse, no recycling) direct connections with additional fixing devices two elements are connected with accessory which can be replaced. If one element has to be removed than whole connection needs to be dismantled indirect connection via dependent third component two elements/components are separated with third element/component, but they have dependence in assembly (reuse is restricted) indirect connection via independent third component there is dependence in assembly/ disassembly but all elements could be reused or recycled indirect with additional fixing device with change of one element another stays untouched all elements could be reused or recycled type of connection graphic representation dependence in assembly fixed flexible Figure 5.21: Seven principles of connections ranged from fixed to flexible connections. installations Floor level + 2700 installations 2.12 In Fi 2.00 La FF 2.03 SFF 2.01 Wi Fr 2.04 Ex Fi 2.02 In Fi 2.06 Ex Fi +2.00 La FF -2.03 SFF Enclosure sub-systems components elements 2.05 So Sh 1. Indirect with additional fixing device 1,0 2. Indirect connection via independent third element 0,8 3. Indirect connection via dependent third element 0,7 4. Direct connection with additional fixing device 0,6 5. Direct connec. between two pre-made comp. 0,4 6. Indirect connection with third chemical material 0,2 7. Direct chemical connection 0,1 Type of connection
  • 37. - 37 - type of connection Examine reuse potential - Building Hs installations Floor level + 2700 installations 1.00 St Co 1.01 St Be 1.05 Pr Bo 2.10 La FF 2.13 SFF 2.11 Wi Fr 2.14 Ex Fi 2.12 In Fi 2.00 La FF 2.03 SFF 2.01 Wi Fr 2.04 Ex Fi 2.02 In Fi 2.06 Ex Fi +2.00 La FF -2.03 SFF +2.10 La FF -2.13 SFF 1.06 Co St 3.01 M St 3.02 Pl fi 2.15 So Sh Infill Enclosure Load bearing 3.04 LCF 3.05 LCP sub-systems components elements elements 3.02 I Insu Service 4.03 S HD 4.04 S VD 4.06 S WD 4.01 S CD 4.02 Ca G 4.04 Radtr elements 2.05 So Sh elements materials 1.03 An Fl 1.03 IC Fl 1.02 Co Fl 1. Indirect with additional fixing device 1,0 2. Indirect connection via independent third element 0,8 3. Indirect connection via dependent third element 0,7 4. Direct connection with additional fixing device 0,6 5. Direct connec. between two pre-made comp. 0,4 6. Indirect connection with third chemical material 0,2 7. Direct chemical connection 0,1 Type of connection 1.04 St Fi 1.00 St Co 1.01 St Be 1.05 Pr Bo 2.10 La FF 2.13 SFF 2.11 Wi Fr 2.14 Ex Fi 2.12 In Fi 2.00 La FF 2.03 SFF 2.01 Wi Fr 2.04 Ex Fi 2.02 In Fi 2.06 Ex Fi +2.00 La FF -2.03 SFF +2.10 La FF -2.13 SFF 1.06 Co St 3.01 M St 3.02 Pl fi 2.15 So Sh Infill Enclosure Load bearing 3.04 LCF 3.05 LCP sub-systems components elements elements 3.02 I Insu 4.06 S WD elements 2.05 So Sh elements materials 1.03 An Fl 1.03 IC Fl 1.02 Co Fl 1. Indirect with additional fixing device 1,0 2. Indirect connection via independent third element 0,8 3. Indirect connection via dependent third element 0,7 4. Direct connection with additional fixing device 0,6 5. Direct connec. between two pre-made comp. 0,4 6. Indirect connection with third chemical material 0,2 7. Direct chemical connection 0,1 Type of connection 1.04 St Fi Load bearing average 0,36 Enclosure average 0,79 Infill average 0,58 Service average 0,58
  • 38. - 38 - 0,00 0,20 0,40 0,60 0,80 1,00 1. assembly direction 2. functional dependence 3. structure and material levels 4. base element specification 5. relational pattern 6. standardization of product edge 7. type of connection Service 0,00 0,20 0,40 0,60 0,80 1,00 1. assembly direction 2. functional dependence 3. structure and material levels 4. base element specification 5. relational pattern 6. standardization of product edge 7. type of connection Enclosure 0,00 0,20 0,40 0,60 0,80 1,00 1. assembly direction 2. functional dependence 3. structure and material levels 4. base element specification 5. relational pattern 6. standardization of product edge 7. type of connection Load bearing Results reuse potential - Building Hs installations Floor level + 2700 installations Reuse potential average load bearing 0,59 enclosure 0,74 infill 0,44 service 0,46 0,00 0,20 0,40 0,60 0,80 1,00 1. assembly direction 2. functional dependence 3. structure and material levels 4. base element specification 5. relational pattern 6. standardization of product edge 7. type of connection Infill
  • 39. - 39 - 0,00 0,20 0,40 0,60 0,80 1,00 1. assembly direction 2. functional dependence 3. structure and material levels 4. base element specification 5. relational pattern 6. standardization of product edge 7. type of connection Service 0,00 0,20 0,40 0,60 0,80 1,00 1. assembly direction 2. functional dependence 3. structure and material levels 4. base element specification 5. relational pattern 6. standardization of product edge 7. type of connection Enclosure 0,00 0,20 0,40 0,60 0,80 1,00 1. assembly direction 2. functional dependence 3. structure and material levels 4. base element specification 5. relational pattern 6. standardization of product edge 7. type of connection Load bearing Results reuse potential - Building Hs installations Floor level + 2700 installations Reuse potential average load bearing 0,59 enclosure 0,74 infill 0,44 service 0,46 0,00 0,20 0,40 0,60 0,80 1,00 1. assembly direction 2. functional dependence 3. structure and material levels 4. base element specification 5. relational pattern 6. standardization of product edge 7. type of connection Infill
  • 40. - 40 - Erasmus building H, Dijkzicht (1960)
  • 41. - 41 - EAST FACADE WEST FACADE 16 15 17 19 20 21 Erasmus building H, Dijkzicht (1960) Section B-B
  • 42. - 42 - 6th floor similar to 2nd - 9th floor Erasmus building H, Dijkzicht (1960)
  • 43. - 43 - 1.00 St Co 1.01 St Be 1.05 Pr Bo 2.10 La FF 2.13 SFF 2.11 Wi Fr 2.14 Ex Fi 2.12 In Fi 2.00 La FF 2.03 SFF 2.01 Wi Fr 2.04 Ex Fi 2.02 In Fi 2.06 Ex Fi +2.00 La FF -2.03 SFF +2.10 La FF -2.13 SFF 1.06 Co St 3.01 M St 3.02 Pl fi 2.15 So Sh Infill Enclosure Load bearing 3.04 LCF 3.05 LCP sub-systems components elements elements 3.02 I Insu 4.06 S WD elements 2.05 So Sh elements materials 1.03 An Fl 1.03 IC Fl 1.02 Co Fl 1. Indirect with additional fixing device 1,0 2. Indirect connection via independent third element 0,8 3. Indirect connection via dependent third element 0,7 4. Direct connection with additional fixing device 0,6 5. Direct connec. between two pre-made comp. 0,4 6. Indirect connection with third chemical material 0,2 7. Direct chemical connection 0,1 Type of connection 1.04 St Fi type of connection Examine reuse potential - Building H 1.00 CC+x 1.01 CF+x 1.02 CC+1 1.03 CF+1 2.10 top 2.15 Ex SS 2.11 Ex FF 2.12 In FF 2.14 In SS 3.01 LCF 2.08 Pa IF 2.07 Ex M materials components Enclosure Load bearing Infill 3.02 LCP 3.00 Pa In 2.05 Ex SS 2.02 In FF 2.01 Ex FF 2.04 In SS 2.06 Co Pa 2.00 top 2.03 Ou Fi 2.13 Ou Fi elements elements materials 2.09 Ex Fi 1.00 St Co 1.01 St Be 1.05 Pr Bo 2.10 La FF 2.13 SFF 2.11 Wi Fr 2.14 Ex Fi 2.12 In Fi 2.00 La FF 2.03 SFF 2.01 Wi Fr 2.04 Ex Fi 2.02 In Fi 2.06 Ex Fi +2.00 La FF -2.03 SFF +2.10 La FF -2.13 SFF 1.06 Co St 3.01 M St 3.02 Pl fi 2.15 So Sh Infill Enclosure Load bearing 3.04 LCF 3.05 LCP sub-systems components elements elements 3.02 I Insu el 2.05 So Sh elements materials 1.03 An Fl 1.03 IC Fl 1.02 Co Fl 1. Indirect with additional fixing device 1,0 2. Indirect connection via independent third element 0,8 3. Indirect connection via dependent third element 0,7 4. Direct connection with additional fixing device 0,6 5. Direct connec. between two pre-made comp. 0,4 6. Indirect connection with third chemical material 0,2 7. Direct chemical connection 0,1 Type of connection 1.04 St Fi
  • 44. - 44 - amount of window frames Outside 592x Inside 592x total 1184x Section 15 Examine reuse potential - Building Hs
  • 45. - 45 - Examine reuse potential - Building Hs Source: Durmisevic (2010) Green design and assembly of buildings and systems TRANSFORMATION CAPACITY REUSEPOTENTIAL Durmisevic, 2006
  • 46. - 46 - Examine reuse potential - Building H Enclosure 4. material/ elements/ components 0,4 structure and material levels Assessment 1. components 1,0 2. elements/ components 0,8 3. elements 0,6 4. material/ element/ component 0,4 5. material/ element 0,2 6. material 0,1 1.00 CC+x 1.01 CF+x 1.02 CC+1 1.03 CF+1 2.10 top 2.15 Ex SS 2.11 In FF 2.12 Ex FF 2.14 In SS 3.01 LCF 2.08 Pa IF 2.07 Ex M materials components Enclosure Load bearing Infill 3.02 LCP 3.00 Pa In 2.05 Ex SS 2.02 In FF 2.01 Ex FF 2.04 In SS 2.06 Co Pa 2.00 top 2.03 Ou Fi 2.13 Ou Fi elements elements materials 1. Pre-made geometry 1,0 2. half standardized geometry 0,5 3. Geometry made on site 0,1 Assessment 2.09 Ex Fi
  • 47. - 47 - Examine reuse potential - Building H base element specification Assessment 1. base element - intermediary between systems/compo- nents 1,0 2. base element on two levels 0,6 3. element with two functions (base element + function) 0,4 4. no base element 0,1 System level Enclosure 1. base element with two functions 0,4 1.00 CC+x 1.01 CF+x 1.02 CC+1 1.03 CF+1 2.10 top 2.15 Ex SS 2.11 Ex FF 2.12 In FF 2.14 In SS 3.01 LCF 2.08 Pa IF 2.07 Ex M materials components Enclosure Load bearing Infill 3.02 LCP 3.00 Pa In 2.05 Ex SS 2.02 In FF 2.01 Ex FF 2.04 In SS 2.06 Co Pa 2.00 top 2.03 Ou Fi 2.13 Ou Fi elements elements materials 1. Pre-made geometry 1,0 2. half standardized geometry 0,5 3. Geometry made on site 0,1 Assessment 2.09 Ex Fi Load-bearing structure Steel window frame Intermediar - base element Load-bearing structure Masonry Masonry
  • 48. - 48 - relational pattern building level 0,4 Assessment 1. vertical 1,0 2. horizontal in lower zone at the diagram 0,6 3. horizontal between upper and lower zone 0,4 4. horizontal in upper zone 0,1 1.01 St Be 2.10 La FF 2.13 SFF 2.11 Wi Fr 2.14 Ex Fi 2.12 In Fi 2.00 La FF 2.03 SFF 2.01 Wi Fr 2.04 Ex Fi 2.02 In Fi 2.06 Ex Fi +2.00 La FF -2.03 SFF +2.10 La FF -2.13 SFF 3.01 M St 3.02 Pl fi 2.15 So Sh Infill Enclosure 3.04 LCF 3.05 LCP sub-systems components elements elements 3.02 I Insu 2.05 So Sh elements materials 1.03 An Fl 1.03 IC Fl 1.02 Co Fl vertical connections horizontal connections Type of connection 1.04 St Fi 1.00 CC+x 1.01 CF+x 1.02 CC+1 1.03 CF+1 2.10 top 2.15 Ex SS 2.11 In FF 2.12 Ex FF 2.14 In SS 3.01 LCF 2.08 Pa IF 2.07 Ex M materials components Enclosure Load bearing Infill 3.02 LCP 3.00 Pa In 2.05 Ex SS 2.02 In FF 2.01 Ex FF 2.04 In SS 2.06 Co Pa 2.00 top 2.03 Ou Fi 2.13 Ou Fi elements elements materials 2.09 Ex Fi Examine reuse potential - Building H
  • 49. - 49 - relational pattern Assessment 1. vertical 1,0 2. horizontal in lower zone at the diagram 0,6 3. horizontal between upper and lower zone 0,4 4. horizontal in upper zone 0,1 Examine reuse potential - Building H system level 0,6 Enclosure 2. horizontal between upper and lower zone 0,4 1.01 St Be 2.10 La FF 2.13 SFF 2.11 Wi Fr 2.14 Ex Fi 2.12 In Fi 2.00 La FF 2.03 SFF 2.01 Wi Fr 2.04 Ex Fi 2.02 In Fi 2.06 Ex Fi +2.00 La FF -2.03 SFF +2.10 La FF -2.13 SFF 3.01 M St 3.02 Pl fi 2.15 So Sh Infill Enclosure 3.04 LCF 3.05 LCP sub-systems components elements elements 3.02 I Insu 2.05 So Sh elements materials 1.03 An Fl 1.03 IC Fl 1.02 Co Fl vertical connections horizontal connections Type of connection 1.04 St Fi 1.00 CC+x 1.01 CF+x 1.02 CC+1 1.03 CF+1 2.10 top 2.15 Ex SS 2.11 Ex FF 2.12 In FF 2.14 In SS 3.01 LCF 2.08 Pa IF 2.07 Ex M materials components Enclosure Load bearing Infill 3.02 LCP 3.00 Pa In 2.05 Ex SS 2.02 In FF 2.01 Ex FF 2.04 In SS 2.06 Co Pa 2.00 top 2.03 Ou Fi 2.13 Ou Fi elements elements materials 1. Pre-made geometry 1,0 2. half standardized geometry 0,5 3. Geometry made on site 0,1 Assessment 2.09 Ex Fi
  • 50. - 50 - standardization of product edge Assessment 1. pre-made geometry 1,0 2. half standardized geometry 0,5 3. geometry made on construction site 0,1 Examine reuse potential - Building H Enclosure average 0,75 Infill Loa bear elements materials 1.03 An Fl 1 IC 1 C 1. Pre-made geometry 1,0 2. half standardized geometry 0,5 3. Geometry made on site 0,1 Assessment 1.00 CC+x 1.01 CF+x 1.02 CC+1 1.03 CF+1 2.10 top 2.15 Ex SS 2.11 Ex FF 2.12 In FF 2.14 In SS 3.01 LCF 2.08 Pa IF 2.07 Ex M materials components Enclosure Load bearing Infill 3.02 LCP 3.00 Pa In 2.05 Ex SS 2.02 In FF 2.01 Ex FF 2.04 In SS 2.06 Co Pa 2.00 top 2.03 Ou Fi 2.13 Ou Fi elements elements materials 1. Pre-made geometry 1,0 2. half standardized geometry 0,5 3. Geometry made on site 0,1 Assessment 2.09 Ex Fi 2.09 Ex Fi
  • 51. - 51 - type of connection 1.00 St Co 1.01 St Be 1.05 Pr Bo 2.10 La FF 2.13 SFF 2.11 Wi Fr 2.14 Ex Fi 2.12 In Fi 2.00 La FF 2.03 SFF 2.01 Wi Fr 2.04 Ex Fi 2.02 In Fi 2.06 Ex Fi +2.00 La FF -2.03 SFF +2.10 La FF -2.13 SFF 1.06 Co St 3.01 M St 3.02 Pl fi 2.15 So Sh Infill Enclosure Load bearing 3.04 LCF 3.05 LCP sub-systems components elements elements 3.02 I Insu 4.06 S WD elements 2.05 So Sh elements materials 1.03 An Fl 1.03 IC Fl 1.02 Co Fl 1. Indirect with additional fixing device 1,0 2. Indirect connection via independent third element 0,8 3. Indirect connection via dependent third element 0,7 4. Direct connection with additional fixing device 0,6 5. Direct connec. between two pre-made comp. 0,4 6. Indirect connection with third chemical material 0,2 7. Direct chemical connection 0,1 Type of connection 1.04 St Fi Enclosure avarage 0,46 Examine reuse potential - Building H 1.00 CC+x 1.01 CF+x 1.02 CC+1 1.03 CF+1 2.10 top 2.15 Ex SS 2.11 Ex FF 2.12 In FF 2.14 In SS 3.01 LCF 2.08 Pa IF 2.07 Ex M materials components Enclosure Load bearing Infill 3.02 LCP 3.00 Pa In 2.05 Ex SS 2.02 In FF 2.01 Ex FF 2.04 In SS 2.06 Co Pa 2.00 top 2.03 Ou Fi 2.13 Ou Fi elements elements materials 2.09 Ex Fi
  • 52. - 52 - Results reuse potential - Building Hs Reuse potential average enclosure 0,41 0,00 0,20 0,40 0,60 0,80 1. assembly direction 3. structure and material levels 4. base element specification 5. relational pattern 6. standardization of product edge 7. type of connection Enclosure
  • 53. Re-design Re-manufacture Re-finance Group 2 | Re-design of a steel structure Group 1 | Re-design of a timber frame facade system elop options’ Select ‘high‘ potential design options Assessment on technical, economic and environmental aspects rational part Re-design Re-manufacture Re-finanace develope reuse scenarios perspectives Building Hs smallest configuration largest configuration Group 2 | Re-design of a steel facade frame system Group 2 | Re-manufacturing of a load-bearing structure incl. floor (sub-group 1) and steel frame facade system (sub-group 2) Group 1 | Re-manufacturing of a timber frame facade system installations Floor level + 2700 Group 2 | Re-finance of a timber facade frame system and load-bearing steel structure Group 1 | Re-finance of a building by disassembly and replacement installations creative part rational part Building Hs smallest configuration largest configuration