This document contains the slides from a presentation on information society and Web 2.0 given on May 27, 2010. The presentation discusses topics like Twitter, semantic social networks, open data, and how technology and social media are transforming society and culture. It provides examples of how companies and governments can benefit from more open policies and APIs. The presentation aims to help understand new concepts of security and control in the networked era.

1. 정보 사회와 웹 2.0 세상 Calm technology Ph. D. Kang, Jang Mook Email : redsea@sejong.ac.kr 교육일 : 2010년05월27일목요일 14:00-15:30(90분) 장소:대전유성호텔 정보문화사업단 정보윤리사업부 주체 정보윤리교육기관담당자 및 강사 워크숍 교육

2. 문자방송-트위터란 무엇인가? 단순한 트위터는 복잡한 무엇을 숨기고 있는가?, 기술로서 트위터는 사회, 문화적으로 어떤 변화를 줄 것인가? 트위터어떻게 이용해야하나? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ddO9idmax0o (Twitter in Plain English )

3. www.jpgmag.com www.videojug.com 야후엔서스: http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20060704195516AAnrdOD 동영상 : http://vodpod.com/watch/2678671-stephen-hawking-how-can-the-human-race-survive-the-next-hundred-years han Boutelle, Designing for social sharing, http://www.slideshare.net/jboutelle/designing-for-social-sharing(30/60),(방문일:2010.01) -11-

4. 유비쿼터스 컴퓨팅과 증강현실 웹 2.0과 시맨틱 웹 UCC와 전문가 콘텐츠 방송과 통신의 융합과 쇼설웹 새로운 서비스의 출현과 사례 공공부분에서의 변화 바람직한 사회 구성 및 기술 맥락 mooknc@gmail.com http://twitter.com/mooknc http://www.facebook.com/#!/jjang.kang May 2010. Kang, Jang Mook mooknc@gmail.com 공학(정보보호, 2005) 박사 정치학(정치법학, 2009) 박사 [ 2 ] Blog : http://blog.ohmynews.com/UCnam/category/10203

5. 시작하는 글 : 연결된 세상 Web 2.0 ... The Machine is Us/ing Us http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6gmP4nk0EOE [ 3 ]

6. 새로운 매체인가? 관계인가? 융합은 어떤 모습으로 무슨 서비스로 어떻게 세상을 변화시키는가? The Twittersphere Say hello in 140 characters [ 4 ]

7. 공간 별 네트워크의 특징, 선호 연결, 선호 원인, 분포 상태 [ 5 ]

9. Intel = Integrated Circuit (1980's-curr.)

10. Microsoft = Desktop (1990's - mid 2000’s)

11. Cisco = Network (1990's-curr.)

12. Google = Search Act II (2000-curr.)

13. PayPal = Online Payments (2000-curr.)

14. Apple = iTunes + iPod (2003-curr.)

15. YouTube = Online Video (2006-curr.)

16. Friendster = Social Networks vI (2002-2004)

17. LinkedIn = Prof. Social Networks (2003-curr.)

18. MySpace = Social Networks v2 (2005-2007)

19. Facebook = Social Networks v3 (2007-curr.)

20. Twitter = Social Networks v3.5 (2008-?)

21. AOL = Email + Gated Internet (1992-2001)

22. Yahoo = Search Act I (1994-2000)

23. Amazon = Books/New Goods (1995-curr.)

24. eBay = Used Goods (1995-2004)

25. Craigslist = Classifieds (1998-curr.)[ 6 ] Social Networks: Facebook, MySpace, LinkedIn, Twitter, Orkut, hi5, Friendster, etc

26. Convergence [ 7 ]

27. 공간 융합과 네트워크 가치 측정 [ 8 ]

28. 쇼설 네트워크 휠 [ 9 ] Mediabistro.com 인용

29. 생산-소비-유통 구조의 변화 [ 10 ]

30. Publish a blog Publish your own Web pages Upload video you created Upload audio/music you created Write articles or stories and post them Creators Post ratings/reviews of products/services Comment on someone else’s blog Contribute to online forums Contribute to/edit articles in a wiki Critics Use RSS feeds Add “tags” to Web pages or photos “Vote” for Web sites online Collectors Maintain profile on a social networking site Visit social networking sites Joiners Read blogs Watch video from other users Listen to podcasts Read online forums Read customer ratings/reviews Spectators None of the above Inactives 참여의 사다리 …..classifies people according to how they participate using social technologies. Groups include people participating in at least one of the activities monthly. [ 11 ]

31. Nod-Hub-Connector 환경 네트워크와 인간망 인간 질병 네트워크와 질병 유전자 네트워크 공공의 망 사유와 토론의 공유지 행정서비스와 개인정보위협 행정효율 및 국민서비스 증진 [ 12 ]

32. 개방과 SNS 구글어스(백악관)과 다음지도(청와대)를 검색해보자. 개방과 보안의 개념을 파악하고 네트워크 시대의 새로운 보안이란 무엇일까? http://earth.google.com/ [ 13 ]

33. 콘테스트; good or bad? [ 14 ]

34. 게시판: good or bad? [ 15 ]

35. 입소문; good or bad? [ 16 ]

36. Semantic Social Networks SSN, describes the notion of integrated and merged social networks. [Stephen Downes, 2004]: “Network resources are expressed in XML or RDF, such as descriptions of persons (authors, readers, critics) References to those descriptions employed in RDF or XML files describing resources.” potential solution for merging and integration of information The Friend-of-a-Friend (FOAF) Project [Dumbill, 2002] [ 17 ]

38. a graph / network structure consisting from:

39. A set of concepts (vertices in a graph);

40. A set of relationships connecting concepts (directed edges in a graph);

41. A set of instances assigned to a particular concepts [ 18 ]

42. 인터넷 지도 [ 19 ]

44. is essentially a data modeling language

45. RDF is graph-based, but usually serialized as XML.

46. it consists of triples: subject, predicate, object.

47. DAML+OIL: Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) Agent Markup Language (DAML) + Ontology Inference Layer (OIL)

48. Fairly comparable to OWL

49. OWL: Web Ontology Language (OWL)

50. the most expressive of the ontology languages

51. provides mechanisms for creating all the components of an ontology[ 20]

52. 관계로 재편되는 매체 How brands currently use Facebook [ 21 ]

53. 웹은 통제 가능한가? 통제의 맥락과 구성요건은? [ 22 ]

54. 기업과 정부의 개방정책이 가져다 준 이익 사례 Most interesting is the fact that it’s the twitter community that have pushed new features and products through the public API. Hundreds of new products and services have been developed. Purely by the community and twitter have become a great tool for research. [ 23 ]

55. 조용한 서비스 [ 24 ] http://www.socialmediatoday.com/ 2009.06.방문

56. 쇼설 웹과 참여 [ 25 ]

57. 쇼설 웹과 신뢰 [ 26 ]

58. 연결의 가치 [ 27 ]

59. ThanQ redsea@sejong.ac.kr The followings were made to supplement my shabby presentation. When you need anything, please e-mail me at this address at any time. 참고 문헌 등은 각 장의 슬라이드 노트에 첨부하였습니다. [ 28 ]