The document contains instructions for several assignments related to analyzing phonological skills. The first assignment involves identifying letters, phonemes, and graphemes in words. The second assignment involves scripting a mini-lesson and creating an accompanying anchor chart based on selected ELAR TEKS. The third assignment provides tips for responding to a constructed response question assessing foundational and comprehension skills.

1. (1) Assignment 7.1A: Identifying Letters, Phonemes, and
Graphemes in Words
Template for 7.1A.docx
• Task 1) Indicate the number of letters in each word.
• Task 2) Indicate the number of phonemes (sounds) in each
word.
• Task 3) Write the phonemes (sounds) for each word. the
Consonant Phoneme Chart and Vowel Phoneme Chart
• Task 4) Indicate the number of graphemes (sounds) in each
word.
• Task 5) Write the graphemes (letters) that represent the
phonemes in each word.
(2) Assignment 13.3A: Scripting a Mini-lesson & Making an
Anchor Chart
Task 1) Choose one of the ELAR TEKS listed below.
• Make inferences and use evidence to support understanding.
• Retell in ways that maintain meaning and logical order.
• Summarize texts in ways that maintain meaning and logical
order.
Task 2) Use the template in Canvas to script a minilesson for
that TEK you selected.

2. (Uploaded)
Task 3) Create an anchor chart to accompany the minilesson you
scripted.
(3) Performance Assessment 13.7: Assessing Foundational and
Comprehension Skills
Instructions
Tips for responding to an STR Constructed Response Question:
• Read the question carefully before you begin to write your
response.
• Use bullets to organize your response.
• Each bullet should address the tasks in the order they appear
in the question.
• There is a suggested word count, but you are not limited to
that word count.
• Your response should directly address each component in
depth.
• The final version of your response should conform to the
conventions of standard English.
• Your written response should be your original work, written in
your own words, and not copied or paraphrased from some other
work.
• You may use citations when appropriate for this
homework help

3. .
Assessment 2: What are the effects of spinal manipulation
(HVLA) on adults with chronic low back pain?
Article 1: A randomized control trial to determine the
effectiveness and physiological effects of spinal manipulation
and spinal mobilization compared to each other and a sham
condition in patients with chronic low back pain: Study protocol
for The RELIEF Study - PubMed (nih.gov)
Article 2: The effect of spinal manipulative therapy on pain
relief and function in patients with chronic low back pain: an
individual participant data meta-analysis - ScienceDirect
Question 1: did the review ask a clearly focussed question?
Yes,
Question 2: did the authors look for the right type of work?
Question 3: do you think the important relevant studies were
included?
Question 4: did the authors do enough to assess the quality of
the included studies?
JBI CRITICAL APPRAISAL CHECKLIST FOR COHORT
STUDIES
This
assignment help
Reviewer: Imtithal Diedericks
Date: 12/10/2021

4. Article: A randomized control trial to determine the
effectiveness and physiological effects of spinal manipulation
and spinal mobilization compared to each other and a sham
condition in patients with chronic low back pain: Study protocol
for The RELIEF Study - PubMed (nih.gov)
Yes No Unclear N/A Justification
Were the two groups similar and recruited from the same
population?
Were the exposures measured similarly to assign people to both
exposed and unexposed groups?
Was the exposure measured in a valid and reliable way?
Was the exposure measured in a valid and reliable way?
Were strategies to deal with confounding factors stated?
Were the groups/participants free of the outcome at the start of
the study (or at the moment of exposure)?
Were the outcomes measured in a valid and reliable way?
Was the follow up time reported and sufficient to be long
enough for outcomes to occur?
Was follow up complete, and if not, were the reasons to loss to
follow up described and explored?
Were strategies to address incomplete follow up utilized?
Was appropriate statistical analysis used?

5. Overall appraisal: Include □ Exclude □ Seek further info□
Comments: (whether you find the article any good)
JBI CRITICAL APPRAISAL CHECKLIST FOR COHORT
STUDIES
Reviewer: Imtithal Diedericks
Date: 12/10/2021
Article: The effect of spinal manipulative therapy on pain relief
and function in patients with chronic low back pain: an
individual participant data meta-analysis - ScienceDirect
Yes No Unclear N/A Justification
Were the two groups similar and recruited from the same
population?
Were the exposures measured similarly to assign people to both
exposed and unexposed groups?
Was the exposure measured in a valid and reliable way?
Was the exposure measured in a valid and reliable way?
Were strategies to deal with confoundin g factors stated?
Were the groups/participants free of the outcome at the start of
the study (or at the moment of exposure)?
Were the outcomes measured in a valid and reliable way?
Was the follow up time reported and sufficient to be long
enough for outcomes to occur?

6. Was follow up complete, and if not, were the reasons to loss to
follow up described and explored?
Were strategies to address incomplete follow up utilized?
Was appropriate statistical analysis used?
Overall appraisal: Include □ Exclude □ Seek further info□
Comments: (whether you find the article any good)
Performance Assessment 5.5A: Analysis of a Phonological
Screening Assessment
Juan is a first grader at Mesa Ridge Elementary. His teacher, Mr
Walker, just completed a phonological screening assessment
with the class. Review and analyze Juan's assessment results to
determine his strengths and weaknesses with phonological and
phonemic awareness skills. In the answer box provided in
Canvas, write a response of approximately 200–300 words.
***Be sure to use the course content when responding to the
following:
• Task 1) Identify the stage of phonological awareness Juan is
currently in.
• Task 2) Identify one significant need that Juan demonstrates
related to phonological or phone mic awareness. Cite specific
evidence from the phonological screening assessment to support
your analysis.
• Task 3) Select and describe one appropriate, effective
instructional strategy or activity that would address the need
you identified related to phonological or phonemic awareness.

7. • Task 4) Explain why the instructional strategy or activity you
described would be effective in addressing the needs you
identified and in helping Juan achieve grade-level reading
standards.
5.1A: Analyzing Spelling Errors
• Ms. Davidson gave a spelling test to her first-grade class.
Afterward, she identified the words that were most confusing
for her students. Read the directions below to help Ms.
Davidson complete an analysis of the spelling errors.
• Directions:
• Task 1) Download the Assignment 5.1 A: Analyzing Spelling
Errors Template
• Task 2) Compare each assigned spelling word to the student
response.
• Task 3) In Column 3, identify the phoneme confusion; which
incorrect phoneme did the student choose?
• Task 4) In Column 4, identify the type of error the student
made (place of articulation, manner of articulation, or both).
• Task 5) In Column 5, explain why that error probably
occurred. ***The first word in the spelling assessment has been
completed for you as an example.
• Dasia is a Kindergarten student at Orchard Elementary. Her
teacher, Ms. Lennon, is reviewing Dasia's Nonsense Word
Fluency assessment and a current writing sample from Dasia's
journal to track Dasia's progress with the alphabetic principle.
Review and analyze Dasia's assessment results and writing
sample to determine her strengths and weaknesses with the

8. alphabetic principle.
Performance Assessment 6.3A: Analysis of Data on Alphabetic
Principle
• Dasia's Assessment Data 1.docx or
https://smashingessays.com/services/coursework-writing-
service/
• In the answer box provided, write a response of approximately
300-500 words. ***Be sure to use the course content when
responding to the following:
• Task 1) Define and explain the differences between the
following terms: phonological and phonemic awareness,
alphabet knowledge, the alphabetic principle, and decoding.
How does mastering the alphabetic principle support reading
fluency?
• Task 2) List and explain the skills that must be in place before
Dasia is able to decode words.
• Task 3) Review Dasia's Nonsense Word Fluency assessment
and writing sample.
• Task 4) Identify one significant need that Dasia demonstrates
related to the alphabetic principle. Cite specific evidence from
the assessment to support your analysis.
• Task 5) Select and describe one appropriate, effective
instructional strategy or activity that would address the need
you identified related to the alphabetic principle.
• Task 6) Explain why the instructional strategy or activity you
described would be effective in addressing the needs you

9. identified and in helping Dasia achieve grade-level reading
standards
https://anyessayhelp.com/services/
.
Assignment 7.1A: Identifying Letters, Phonemes, and
Graphemes in Words
Template for 7.1A.docx
• Task 1) Indicate the number of letters in each word.
• Task 2) Indicate the number of phonemes (sounds) in each
word.
• Task 3) Write the phonemes (sounds) for each word. the
Consonant Phoneme Chart and Vowel Phoneme Chart
• Task 4) Indicate the number of graphemes (sounds) in each
word.
• Task 5) Write the graphemes (letters) that represent the
phonemes in each word.