Neil Postman's Warning About Amusing Ourselves to Death

Summary Of Amusing Ourselves To Death By Neil Postman
In Amusing Ourselves To Death, Neil Postman explains identifying qualities for those who lived in
the "Age of Exposition." (63) He believes that between the eighteenth and the nineteenth century
American's had a "Typographic Mind." (44) Qualities such as attention span and listening ability are
just a few examples of the deep understanding they had of the world around them. Neil Postman
proves his point through examples of law, advertising, and religion. The first of four qualities
Postman describes is most easily explained as "polysemy." To Neil Postman, the use of literary
language in speech correlates to the general public's understanding of this style of phrasing. He
states, "...the use of language as a means of complex argument was an important, ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
Back to Edwards, "...he spent long hours each day in his study..." (54) Postman uses this to present
that the devotion to knowledge seemed to be what drove the length of attention up. In regards to
advertising, Neil Postman goes on, "...when the first paid advertisement appeared in an American
newspaper, The Boston News–Letter. These were three in number occupying altogether four inches
of single–column space." (58) This leads Postman to believe that people of the time had the ability
to keep their attention on long advertisements, most of which not for things of sale. Another
example, "Paul Revere placed the following advertisement in the Boston Gazette: ... Revere went on
to explain in another paragraph..." (59) Again, this is another lengthy ad providing evidence of
longer attention spans. The fourth and final quality is how well they could understand the issues
presented. Neil Postman states, "The Lincoln–Douglas audience apparently had a considerable grasp
of the issues being debated, including knowledge of historical events and complex political
matters.... All of which would have been rhetorically pointless unless the audience was familiar..."
(46) In other words, Postman is saying people of that time had extensive previous knowledge prior
to entering the
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

Christina Contreras. Mr. Limon. Erwc. 01 March 2017. The
Christina Contreras
Mr. Limon
ERWC
01 March 2017
The Relevance of Neil Postman's Assertions in Today's Society: Huxley's Brave New World could
be considered almost prophetic by many people today. It is alarmingly obvious how modern society
is eerily similar to Huxley's novel with the constant demand for instant gratification encouraging
unnatural changes. Neil Postman, a contemporary social critic, seems to have noticed this similarity
as he has made very bold, very valid statements regarding the text and its relevance to our world
today. This statement is strongly in support of those statements and will provide both support and
counterargument in an effort to thoroughly explain why. According to Postman, "Huxley feared the
truth would ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In the novel, there is the same problem when Linda sleeps with the husbands of other women in an
effort to achieve sexual stimulation. As a result, women "[began] hitting her with a whip...and each
time Linda screamed" (134). Also, when Bernard completely loses his social status after John
refuses to show up to one of his parties, he "...began to weep...[and later] took four tablets of soma"
(182). Bernard, in an attempt to reach something he absolutely loved––attention and social
approval––ended up filling himself with a drug addicting enough to put his mental health in danger.
Considering people today take whatever drug they can to avoid feeling sad, Portman's quote
prevails. Lastly, when John tries to defend morals like being chaste, he is rebuked by Mustapha
Mond, who says, "...chastity means passion [and neurasthenia], [and those things] lead to
instability...and instability means the end of civilization" (239). Later, when he begins whipping
himself as an act of self–discipline, he is encouraged to continue by a crowd of desensitized people
saying, "Do the whipping stunt. Let's see the whipping stunt" (257). Both these quotes support
Postman's take on Huxley's fear, which go, "Huxley feared [society] would become a trivial culture,
preoccupied with some equivalent of the feelies, [orgy–porgy, and centrifugal bumblepuppy]". All
the New Society cares about is pleasures that mean nothing in the

Neil Postman Amusing Ourselves To Death Analysis
Neil Postman; cultural critic, author, and teacher extraordinaire, spent his career warning and
educating about the role technology was beginning to play in society. He wrote all of his books,
articles, and speeches by hand and reportedly never met a computer or typewriter that he liked. He
also never published an academic journal article due to his belief that his ideas were meant to be
read by all, not exclusively a handful of scholars. In today's age of technological overload, just thirty
years after his most well–known book "Amusing Ourselves to Death," Neil Postman is revered as a
prophet as more and more of our media consumption becomes purely for entertainment purposes.
According to Postman a metaphor is the way in which our forms

Amusing Ourselves to Death by Neil Postman
Neil Postman writes, Amusing Ourselves to Death to address a television–based epistemology
pollutes public communication and its surrounding landscape, not that it pollutes everything. The
book was produced in 1984 in a time where television was an emerging epidemic and other forms of
communication that today have taken flight, didn't exist. It is directed to people who have let
television drag them away from their Focus and attention to comprehend as they have lost the ability
to bring forth your own knowledge and find meaning. Postman's purpose to spread the word of this
discourse and inform them of how much society is being set back due to the over indulging of
television Opening the book, Postman explains how he will fulfill showing that a "great media–
metaphor shift has taken place in America, with the result that content of much of our public
discourse has become dangerous nonsense" (pg. 16). There are two major points First: under the
printing press, discourse In America was different from what it is now–generally coherent, serious,
rational. Second: under the governance of television, it has become withered. This made me think
about how much media affects us on a daily basis. The first section of the Amusing Ourselves to
Death is where Postman brings up a series of good points/. Postman explains how the bias of a
medium sits heavy, felt but unseen, over a culture. He offers three cases of truth–telling. First,
"when a dispute arises, the complainants come before

Amusing Ourselves To Death: An Analysis
1985 brought a collective sigh of relief to my high school graduating class. We read Orwell's 1984
in 9th grade English; resulting in fear of the immediate future and suspicion toward anything
smacking of governmental control. Reaching our graduation in May 1985, as independent American
citizens free of Big Brother (or so we thought), gave some of us a sense that we had "beat the
system", as Gen–Xers are wont to claim. I wonder how many of my classmates would have agreed
with what Neil Postman asserted that same year in Amusing Ourselves to Death: TV had ushered in
a cultural shift in public discourse, leading to our willing oppression by entertainment. Postman's
purpose stays true throughout the book: to compare Orwell's 1984 and Huxley's Brave New World
in the culture of 1985 United States. Postman vied that our culture was not suffering Orwellian
subjugation by government, but Huxley's dominance by pleasure, resulting in passivity and
indifference, at the hands of TV. Postman does not demand that TV be eradicated from our lives, nor
does he wail that we ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Meaningless interaction abounds on the Internet today as well. Thus, I ask: has the culture of the
United States become even more indifferent now, 30 years later? I argue the answer is yes and no.
Perhaps the answer changes depending on the particular medium of the Internet (which platform),
the generation, and the geographic area. Speaking from personal experience as a former high school
teacher, although far from statistically sound, teens in southeast Kansas using Snapchat rarely use it
for sober conversation; keeping up with each other's minor daily events categorizes Snapchat's usage
for them. However, 2016 Presidential candidate Bernie Sanders lit up the Twittersphere during the
early August 2015 Republican debate, interacting with thoughtful responses to the debate by

Summary Of Amusing Ourselves To Death Postman
Humanity has far surpassed anything that was seen as impossible. However, as society progressed
did we get distracted on the way? Did we seem to lose track of the important things that mattered in
our lives? In the mid–1980s Neil Postman wrote a book called Amusing Ourselves to Death which
talks about how technology and media has reshaped our culture and he makes predictions on how it
will shape our future. The purpose of this paper is to update Postman's perspective to the present.
Throughout the last chapter of the book Postman talks about how technology has distracted us, and
how it has changed our social lives. This paper will provide information on how Postman's
perspective examples connect to society today, and how many of us are influenced by it without
even noticing it.
In the time period Amusing Ourselves to Death was written, more and more people ... Show more
Postman says "Television as I have implied earlier, serves us most usefully when presenting junk–
entertainment; ... news, politics, science, education, commerce, religion – and turns them into
entertainment packages." (Postman 159) This election year people are making fun of the candidates
running for president. Many of these people don't even seem concerned because television has
turned politics into entertainment.
Asbeek Brusse author of Educational Storylines in Entertainment Television says "Although
embedding a health product into an entertainment program to covertly influence the public may add
to the program's intended prosocial effects and may be socially desirable for some target groups,
other consumers might find this tactic offensive or morally unacceptable." (Educational Storylines
398) Many products aren't taken seriously because there are embedded into entertainment. Even
though entertainment is added to catch the viewer's attention it may leave many crucial things

Amusing Ourselves To Death By Neil Postman
In the book "Amusing ourselves to death" Neil Postman is making an argument about the fact that
humans could amuse themselves to death in their lives.Even if when we think of death we think at
something terrible,in his book this particular term is asociated with "amusament" which is a quite
unusual asociation of terms.At the beggining of the book the author is making a paralel between
Orwell and Huxley.What is quite known about these two is the fact that their ideas were different
and the book "Amusing ourselves to death" states this ideas.What Orwell feared were those who
would ban books.What Huxley feared was that there would be no reason to ban a book,for there
whould be no one who would want to read one.Orwell feared those who would deprive ... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Postman thinks that all culture is a conversation, or more precisely a corporation of conversations,
conducted in a variety of symbolic modes. His attention here was on how forms of public discourse
regulate and even dictate what kind of content can issue from such forms. He states the fact that
American Indians were using smoke signals but this particular type of conversation could not be
very detailed for they could not communicate philosophical arguments. But when you transmit
information through smoke signals, writing or radio, the shape of a man becomes irrelevant. All that
matters are the ideas he states and the way he thinks. I think that if people could focus more on what
a person has to say and less on how a person looks we could actually learn something from each
other and become more informed. Neil Postman states the fact that "how a person looks is quite
relevant on television. The grossness of a three hundred pound image, even a talking one, would
easily overwhelm any logical or spiritual subtleties conveyed by speech. For on television, discourse
is conducted largely through visual imagery, which is to say that television gives us a conversation
in images, not words. The emergence of the image–manager in the political arena and the
concomitant decline of the speech writer attest to the fact that television demands a different kind of
content from other media. You cannot do political philosophy on television. Its form works against
the content". Given to this, we could affirm that television changed the game and now images
become more important than the information that is sent. People would often remember images
more quickly than information and this is quite sad given the fact that we should be more concerned
with the news, not the way they are submitted. Because of television people became superficial and
stopped looking for information on their own, instead they

Amusing Ourselves To Death By Greg Beato
In "Amusing Ourselves to Death," Greg Beato compares and contrasts The Onion to traditional
newspapers and determiness why the former is more successful. First, while newspapers scramble to
add extras that will make their content more engaging to readers, The Onion focuses on making fake
news and only on the readers which makes them naturally engaging to their target market. As a
result, it has a 60% increase in print circulation for the past three years (Beato para. 5). Second,
while the news are usually not entertaining, The Onion is "fun to read"(Beato para. 6). Many
journalists find "humor" as the opposite of seriousness, so they cannot embrace the same
entertaining value as The Onion (Beato para. 7). Also, while traditional ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
First, children grow up having fewer and fewer friends of the opposite sex which separates their
social universe and makes less knowledgeable of each other's communication beliefs, values, and
practices. Second, parents and other institutions teach boys and girls differently in how to handle
their emotions (Goleman 3). Parents talk about emotions with their daughters more than their sons
(Goleman 3). In fact, "mothers tend to display a wider range of emotions to daughters than to sons"
and discuss emotional states in greater detail with girls than boys (Goleman 3). If they do talk about
emotions with sons, they are focused on anger and its consequences, a topic removed in discussions
with girls (Goleman 3). Likewise, girls usually develop their language skills more quickly then
boys, so they become more experienced in expressing their feelings, unlike boys "for whom the
verbalization of affects is de–emphasized, may become largely unconscious of their emotional
states, both in themselves and others" (Goleman 4). By the time kids are 13 years old, girls have
developed sophistication in handling negative emotion with their "vicious gossip" and "indirect
vendettas," while boys simply resort to aggressive confrontation mechanisms (Goleman 5).
Moreover, girls focus on their intimate social networks when playing, while boys are geared

Truth Exposed in Amusing Ourselves to Death Essay
Truth Exposed in Amusing Ourselves to Death
Neil Postman is deeply worried about what technology can do to a culture or, more importantly,
what technology can undo in a culture. In the case of television, Postman believes that, by happily
surrendering ourselves to it, Americans are losing the ability to conduct and participate in
meaningful, rational public discourse and public affairs. Or, to put it another way, TV is undoing
public discourse and, as the title of his book Amusing Ourselves to Death suggests, we are willing
accomplices.
Postman bases his argument on the belief that public discourse in America, when governed by the
epistemology of the printing press, was "generally coherent, serious, and rational" (16) because ...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Postman says that, as a result, "all public understanding of these subjects is shaped by the biases of
television" (78) and that in the absence of rational discourse, cultural decay is sure to follow.
In an effort to expose the epistemology of television, which Postman believes has not been
effectively addressed, he examines the effects of TV on several important American cultural
institutions: news, religion, politics and education. All four institutions, Postman argues, have
realized that they have to go on television in order to be noticed which, in turn, requires them to
learn the language of TV if they are to reach the people. Therefore, they have joined the national
conversation not on their own terms, but on TV's terms. Postman contends that this transformation
of our major institutions has trivialized what is most important about them and turned our culture
into "one vast arena for show business" (80). In the case of broadcast news, we see visually
stimulating, disconnected stories about murder and mayhem along with a healthy dose of
infotainment delivered by friendly and likeable anchors that remind us to "tune in tomorrow". In the
case of politics, we have discourse through distorted paid TV commercials and "debates" in which
the appearance of having said something important is

Amusing Ourselves To Death Chapter 1 Summary
2. According to Amusing Ourselves to Death, "Toward the end of the nineteenth century, for reasons
I am most anxious to explain, the Age of Exposition began to pass, and the early signs of its
replacement could be discerned. Its replacement was to be the Age of Show Business" (Postman,
Chapter 4 Page # 63 ,). Today as we have entered into that age with the Internet it can grab attention
because it is entertaining and overloading the public with information so they will be involved.
However, we are choosing sound bytes or entertainment over "actual knowledge" and forgetting it
quickly and on to the next big story. This is the "now this" effect that Postman discussed, " of
course, in television's presentation of the "news of the day," we may ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
And most important of all, there is no subject of public interest– politics, news, education, religion,
and science, sports that does not find its way to television. Which means that all public
understanding of these subjects is shaped by the biases of television" (Postman, 2005). According to
Salon, Postman shared the idea with Mcluhan that "technology is not neutral" he said now our truth
moves with our technology advancements. Postman was not just worried about the way we use our
technology but how our technology is using us. Postman made clear where his values were: "Some
ways of truth–telling are better than others, and therefore have a healthier influence on the cultures
that adopt them." What Orwell feared were those who would ban books. What Huxley feared was
that there would be no reason to ban a book, for there would be no one who wanted to read one"
(Salon). As Postman states, "Tyrants of all varieties have always known about the value of providing
the masses with amusements as a means of pacifying discontent. But most of them could not have
even hoped for a situation in which the masses would ignore that which does not amuse. That is why
tyrants have always relied, and still do, on censorship. Censorship, after all, is the tribute tyrants pay
to the assumption that a public knows the difference between serious discourse and entertainments
and cares. Huxley feared

Amusing Ourselves To Death Analysis
In the book "Amusing ourselves to death" Neil Postman is making an argument about the fact that
humans could amuse themselves to death in their lives.Even if when we think of death we think at
something terrible,in his book this particular term is asociated with "amusament" which is a quite
unusual asociation of terms.At the beggining of the book the author is making a paralel between
Orwell and Huxley.What is quite known about these two is the fact that their ideas were different
and the book "Amusing ourselves to death" states this ideas.What Orwell feared were those who
would ban books.What Huxley feared was that there would be no reason to ban a book,for there
whould be no one who would want to read one.Orwell feared those who would deprive ... Show
The book "Amusing Ourselves to Death" is actually an argument. An argument that we live in a
trivial culture, that we take as valid information everything we see on television, or everything we
think we know. Actually, everything is actually a metaphor. Time is a metaphor, language is a
metaphor, life itself can be a metaphor. Culture can be changed really easily through information
and information can be changed really easily through language. To what extent does the advent of
instantaneous communication and information dictate the way we understand people? Does social
media insist that we understand a person by the details he or she chooses to share? These questions
are certainly relevant today, and if nothing else, the schemata for asking them laid out in this first
chapter is a useful tool for

Amusing Ourselves For Death By Neil Postman
In the second part of Neil Postman's book, Amusing Ourselves to Death, the author examines the
medium of education in order to exhibit how it has affected and fashioned modern public discourse.
Postman uses a two–part argument on the topic of the influence that television has over education.
In order to properly demonstrate the authors view and evidence on this subject of discourse, as well
as my own, I will explore how television presents education as well as how exactly television has
managed to alter education when it is faced outside of television. Postman believes that when the
discourse of education is presented on television, its only purpose is to entertain. Education on
television is believed to teach youth in a way that they will embrace with open arms due to their
prior understanding to television. To further expand on his own viewpoint, Postman makes the claim
that television is a curriculum. The author defines a curriculum to be "a specifically constructed
information system whose purpose is to influence, teach, train or cultivate the mind and character of
youth" (146). The author makes the claim that rather than achieving its aim to teach and train youth
in a more colorful fashion, it instead only draws the young viewer to love the images that are being
shown through a screen. The author proposes that television has three separate commandments that
make up the values of education. Postman introduces the first commandment, thou shalt have no
prerequisites,

Amusing Ourselves To Death Summary
In Amusing Ourselves to Death, by Neil Postman, Postman instills his thesis supporting the concept
that "all public discourse increasingly takes the form of entertainment" which created a position
where Americans are "slowly amusing ourselves to death" (3–4). He furthers this in stating that our
discourse works through "media–metaphors" which function to define our world yet gives us no
detail of anything at all. These forms of discourse result in limiting and regulating what the world
must be which ultimately hinders a society altogether. Postman connects this with society through
his belief that the way we receive truth and the technologies that do so define a society's truth. He
then shifts to analyze the impact of television as a medium

Analysis Of Amusing Ourselves To Death By Neil Postman
Amusing Ourselves to Death, written by Neil Postman analyzes the true meaning of entertainment
and explores how it affects our lives today. "Entertainment is the action of providing or being
provided with amusement or enjoyment," (dictionary.com). According to Postman television has had
an extremely negative effect on the "public discourse of contemporary America." Postman compares
his book to Aldous Huxley's, Brave New World, which communicates that people are too amused
and are becoming weak and defenseless. In Amusing Ourselves to Death: Public Discourse in the
Age of Show Business, author Neil Postman clearly reflects a negative bias in his analysis against
television's modern culture, using examples of politics and news.
Postman ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Instead it's verbalized for about 30 seconds and then we move on to some commercial about dove
soap or which celebrity came out with a new album. We cannot blame television for the words
"now... this" for is it not television itself, "it is the offspring of the intercourse between telegraphy
and photography," (Postman 100). The concept has grown and become more popular through
television. Postman uses journalist Christine Craft as an example. Christine was fired from her job
as a news anchor in Kansas because she didn't fit "hampered viewer acceptance... viewers do not
like looking at the performer," (Postman 101). Postman finds it horrific that people care more about
who's telling the news than the news itself. In addition, introduces the fact that during news shows
music is playing, to create a state of mind and communicate to viewers not to be alarmed. "If there
was no music viewers would expect something truly alarming, possibly life–altering" (Postman
102). Postman concluding his thoughts about news by saying, "the value of news is determined by
the laughs it provides," (Postman 113). Can we survive in a world that cares more about entertaining
it's audience than trying to fix the world and make people more aware of the problems we face?
In Amusing Ourselves to Death: Public Discourse in the Age of Show Business, author Neil

Analysis Of Neil Postman's Amusing Ourselves To Death
In Neil Postman's book Amusing Ourselves to Death (1985), Postman argues that the information
shared with the American populace is shaped by the forms of media that are used. By giving a
history of the changing types of American media and the effect that each has on the information
given, Postman supports his claim. Postman's purpose is to prove that media changes the
information given to the public in order to call awareness to the validity of our news. Postman writes
to an audience who is educated by media and was raised through knowledge shared by media.
Postman states that the main point to Amusing Ourselves to Death is about how, "Our metaphors
create the content of our culture" (Postman 15). A metaphor is something that describes ... Show
The effect of this was that nothing could be simply looking at, but had to be looked over to find the
fact. With the invention of the telegraph, a large change came over the American culture. Because of
the increased speed of news, more news was sent out. This created an influx of irrelevant news and
the American people were forced to try to figure out what news was important and which was
worthless. With the influx, the idea of knowing something became not actually knowing the
background, but just knowing the headline. The biggest change to American culture came from
television. Television is viewed as a factual source; however, "television...is devoted entirely to
supplying its audience with entertainment" (Postman 87). The addition of television changed culture
because it a major source of so–called facts was just a disguise for entertainment. The effect of this
is that people's information becomes a source of entertainment and the entertainment is taken as fact.
The changing forms of media and information creates a culture that the perceived truth becomes the
same as entertainment and there is a lack of ability to see the difference between the two. Neil
Postman wrote this book 32 years ago, yet the sentiments are the same. Postman's arguments have
grow to become more relevant in the years since the book's original release. Postman's belief that,
"Our politics, religion, news,

Neil Postman's 'Amusing Ourselves to Death': A Review
No Longer Fun Neil Postman's Amusing Ourselves to Death is a trenchant piece of social
commentary about the very nature of society at the time of his writing in the final decades of the
20th century. The book assesses the importance of television in the lives of its viewers, and denotes
how that importance itself shapes those lives and, by extension, the surrounding world. The
particular time in which this manuscript was published is immensely significant, since it occurred a
year after 1984, which was also the title of an exceedingly dystopian novel by George Orwell.
Postman's narrative alludes to similarities between the social perspective of people in 1985 and that
depicted within Orwell and other dystopian novels (such as Aldus Huxley's Brave New World), to
demonstrate what he views as the overall negative effects of television and the culture it has bred.
He reaches this conclusion after systematically examining several historical eras (and their cultural
precepts) that preceded those invoked through the age of television. In elucidating the thesis of
Postman's work, it is necessary to begin with the importance that he assigns to television and its
place in the American culture. The ubiquity of television as the most effective and widely used
medium in the 1980's should not be doubted, as it definitely supplanted radio's place in this regard
and had yet to be surmounted by the internet. Computers and video games were present in their most
basic forms, and

Analysis Of Neil Postman's Amusing Ourselves To Death
Growing up as a child, my mom made a habit out of watching the morning news no matter what was
taking place in the country. Whether my mom watched the news for entertainment or to see what
was significant to her has been left unanswered. Correspondingly, in Amusing Ourselves to Death,
Neil Postman argues that the news today is entertainment and irrelevant to the people who obtain it.
Not to mention Postman's character, Henry David Thoreau gives an example of Postman's debate
stating, "Perchance the first news that will leak into the flapping American ear will be that Princess
Adelaide has the whooping cough." To validate Postman's argument, I watched a 30–minute news
segment from News 7, on January 25th, 2017. The section stated that a birth certificate found in the
debris left by a tornado that battered Petal, MS on January 21st, 2017. Also, after reviewing several
news segments, I found Postman's theory to be accurate. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net
...
The information–action ratio is that the news we perceive is simply merrymaking and meaningless.
Such statement as Thoreau's is considered entertainment and irrelevant to anyone who inherits this
so–called "news." What would one do if Princess Adelaide receives diagnoses of the whooping–
cough? I assume it would be nothing. Comparatively, I observed a news segment on January 18,
2017, which detailed that the president of the United States son was mocked and made fun of since
he is a child one of the world's richest men, Donald J. Trump. As I sat silently on my bed, I tried to
comprehend what I had heard. After being informed I found zero allegation of the announcement
crucial to anyone in the U.S. However, I must admit it was entertaining as much as Postman
confirmed it would

Postman's Amusing Ourselves to Death Essay
Amusing Ourselves to Death; Mediums, Friend or Foe?
Electronic media is inferior to print media due to the fact that electronic media can be bias,
selective, and evasive for the purpose of entertainment. Electronic media serves as a form of
entertainment with a main goal of serving their ratings rather than serving the people. It would seem
that Postman would agree with this theory since he describes electronic media as a form of
entertainment rather than a reliable source of information and facts in his book Amusing Ourselves
to Death.
Let's start by taking a look at the bias side of electronic media. Take for instance the difference
between Fox News and CBS. Both are news stations, both are intended to bring us the news, yet the
... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Earlier this week, the FBI officially transferred the Chandra Levy investigation to its Cold Case unit,
which historically has handled only the toughest of cases, which have few clues. [Rest of story]
RATHER: You may want to keep in mind the case remains officially a "missing person" case. No
crime has been established, no one has been accused by lawmen–of anything, much less formally
charged. No one's been charged with breaking any laws. (Dan Rather and Jim Stewart, CBS Evening
News, 7/18/01)
While the contrasts between the two are obviously different where one depicts that Condit is the
cause of the problem, the other clearly states just the facts.
My second point is that Electronic Media tends to become evasive while broadcasting.
They tend to focus on points that were based on opinion rather than facts so that they may receive
more ratings, in turn create more profit. I once again turn to the same story of Chandra Levy's
disappearance. Although CBS just states the facts, Fox News states opinions in their polls, news
article headings, and their complete coverage of the story, while focusing on Mr. Condit (Fox News
7/15/01). Fox News gained high ratings for the Chandra Levy story, only because they fed off of the
icon, Gary Condit. Bringing a celebrity into anything makes it more interesting because he or she is
more widely known. Now when you have titles such as "Condit's Acting Guilty" (Dana Blanton,
Fox News 7/07/01), you will have

Postman's Amusing Ourselves to Death Essay
Postman's Amusing Ourselves to Death
I have just read Postman's Amusing Ourselves to Death. Postman states that the age of typography
has been replaced by the age of television. This has changed the way we look at the world and the
way we think, which in turn has almost made us less intelligent. Postman speaks his opinions freely,
and really gives the reader a new perspective on media, and the effect it has on society. To often we
think nothing of what we see and read in the media, but after reading this book you see things a lot
differently.
Postman believes that the culture is shaped by how its media is conducted. In the age of typography,
for example, politicians spoke of how people wrote. In today?s society the news is ... Show more
Teaching is also different.
Children now think that we should learn by watching television. Postman believes that the only way
to really learn is through the traditional methods. Shows such as Sesame Street cause more harm
than good. They make the classroom seem even less exciting. I agree with his point on debates and
that they could stand to be lengthened so we could get a better idea of what the candidates truly
think. But I disagree with his point on education. Yes television can have a negative effect, but not
shows such as Sesame Street, and other learning programs. Children learn more from these types of
shows then many other methods of teaching.
Postman goes deep into television and its damaging effects on our culture. Postman says that when
watching Television for entertainment only no harm is done, but when it tries to inform us that is
when it can get dangerous. He goes into the history of technology and how it affected the past. His
main focus throughout the book is that the media shapes our culture directly. We tend not to see just
how media does this; we just keep thinking that everything that happens on TV is ?ok? and ?
normal?
Our main fear is that one–day books and teachers will not be needed. That technology will provide
all sources of teaching. Our culture, our society has been moving so quickly, its scary to think of
what the future holds, and how much more effect that media will have on us. Postman believes that
people have

Amusing Ourselves To Death Postman
Amusing Ourselves to Death Experiment
I never thought about what it would be like living without technology until I got assigned my
summer reading project, a twenty–four hour electronic media fast. That meant absolutely no cell
phone, computer, radio, television, you couldn't even ride in a car! From the beginning I knew this
would be very challenging for me considering my cell phone is glued to me at the hip and I can't
sleep without the light from a television. I know, pathetic. When I first started I thought this would
be so easy. I would breeze through this with no problem. Man was I wrong! I started at around nine–
o'clock PM the night before my full day so that meant I would stop at nine–o'clock PM the next
night. On a normal night I fall asleep around twelve AM however, on this night I surprisingly fell
asleep around eleven ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
It saddens me to think that so many teens rely on their phone for entertainment. It was so refreshing
getting out in the pool and swimming around and by the end of the day I was so proud of myself for
getting through because I honestly thought that I was going to break in the middle.
Postman's argument that through technology we are "amusing ourselves to death" is also relevant to
the age of Internet. With the Internet we have many different sources available to get a lot of
information quickly. But, do we truly understand all the information? Postman thinks we take things
out of context and do not reason anymore. Also, look how entertaining the Internet can be. YouTube
has videos and other media. You can download music and movies. Social media is entertainment as
well.
However, you could say postman's argument is not relevant to the Internet age because with social
media like Facebook, twitter, emails we are actually writing more than before. We also have many
sources available to compare information, hopefully helping us think

In his book Amusing Ourselves to Death, social critic Neil Postman claims there is one novel that
directly relates to questioning the fate of humanity: Aldous Huxley's Brave New World. Postman
analyzes Huxley to other authors such as 1984's George Orwell, citing their similarities in style.
However, compared to other dystopian novels, Postman believes that Brave New World is much
more relevant to today's society, highlighting its aspects of technological advancement, the
expulsion of self–knowledge and learning, and the potentials of exorbitant consumerism. Postman
asserts what Huxley feared the world would become, and how his vision implies to the abounding
possibilities of the future.
Postman writes, "As he (Huxley) saw it, people will ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The Director presents this point to the students, "We condition the masses to hate the country, but
simultaneously we condition them to love all country sports. At the same time, we see to it that all
country sports shall entail the use of elaborate apparatus. So that they consume manufactured
articles as well as transport. Hence those electric shocks." (17) He further shares, "...Strange to think
that even in Our Ford's day most games were played without more apparatus than a ball or two and a
few sticks and perhaps a bit of netting. Imagine the folly of allowing people to play elaborate games
which do nothing whatever to increase consumption. It's madness." (23) An endless supply of drugs,
an insistence on lewdness, the denial of the past or future in place of the present, and the use of
sleep–teaching beginning at a young age mislead citizens into a twisted unconsciousness, oblivious
to the corrupt and malicious motives of the World State. Postman's statement reveals Huxley's satire
on current economic values, displayed in an extreme fashion in the

Amusing Ourselves To Death Essay
Question Two:
While having read many different authors this semester for this class, two seemed to jump out at me
in having the most in common. Neil Postman(1985) does not specifically discuss the societal
pressures of forced gender roles in advertising the same way the Jean Kilbourne addresses in her
book and film series, but there is a connection in the topics they discuss. I was a bit put off by the
task of reading the entire Postman book, Amusing Ourselves to Death, however, the topics in each
chapter make for some thought provoking and tantalizing ideas of the societal issues that we seem to
take for granted. The chapter about public discourse and the new methods that were employed to
create communication through the age of exposition ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
These two authors do not necessarily have much in common on the surface but just below when one
can ascertain the message being put out by each author it is clearly connected in the form of
technology, its historical and current uses and how the advent of easy communication technology
has allowed us to water down our vast culture by making it easy to objectify humans, animals and
nature if the explanation is sensational enough. I've learned through reading Neil Postman's
book(1985), Amusing Ourselves to Death, that we seem to look at forms of communication as
following a linear path. The invention of easy communication created a niche in societies that
became a place for further discourse, sharing of ideas and knowledge, but in the end, was used
ultimately to control, shape and form the masses. Neil Postman delved into topics that I think are
somewhat forgotten by history and societies as they become so engrained in our way of viewing the
world around us. Jean Kilbourne (1999) taught me that we are all subjected to societal gender
normalization through mass media, print media and news programs. The sheer lack of honest and
open communication in our society puts us at risk for being objectified, sexualized and demoralized,
all without realizing that this is

Amusing Ourselves To Death Summary
Neil Postman's book, Amusing Ourselves to Death, discusses how the media has altered the world.
The book, written in 1985, applies to the twenty–first century regarding how television, computers,
phones, and many other technologies have affected the world. In Amusing Ourselves to Death, Neil
Postman discusses technologies and media. Modern media seduces and imprisons Americans and
transforms them from citizens into consumers. The media and various technologies degrade
democracy. Media and various technologies corrupt Americans and make them more of consumers
than citizens. As Postman talks about in the book, politicians use television and other technologies
only to win votes (Postman 129). The political ads that are available to the public rarely discuss a
candidate's ideas and honest thoughts. More times than not, political ads are used to entertain
viewers, and this ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Throughout the entire book Postman includes examples of how the world has transformed into one
full of entertainment. One example is Postman's perception of American culture and how it can all
be defined by one city, Las Vegas (Postman 3). Vegas is full of entertainment and their only purpose
is to entertain. Another example is Sesame Street (Postman 144). Sesame Street encourages children
to start their learning at a very young age, and learn from a place outside of school. The problem
with the show, according to Postman, is that it is a form of entertainment. When children learn from
Sesame Street they begin to think that all learning should be fun and entertaining. Then, when kids
enter school and the learning there is not the same as TV, they are upset and become way harder to
teach. When people are surrounded by a world of entertainment, they begin to think that everything
should be amusing. The world is changing into a complete form of

In the article Amusing Ourselves to Death by Neil Postman, he brings into question if our society
has in fact, delved into the story line of a George Orwellian or Brave New World scenario. In
George Orwell's 1984, the culture had gotten rid of useful and sufficiently communicative language,
as well as written text contradicting anything to do with the government. The characters, along with
being forbidden individual or radical thoughts, were deprived of their individualism and history. The
Brave New World scenario, as mentioned by Postman, portrays another story. Instead of having
external oppression, as in 1984, the characters willingly gave themselves over to the love of
technology that, "undo their capacity to think." Postman believes that the American culture is
moving towards a Huxleyan future and gives an example in a study taken in 1983 by the Nielsen
Report on Television. He summarizes that the average American child watches 5,000 hours of
television before they even start school, and 16,000 hours by the time they graduate high school.
This startling data contributed to a growing alarm that both television and other aspects of daily life
(church, school, news, politics) are leaning more towards the pull of entertaining its audience than
delivering ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The pull towards technology is as strong as it ever was, but is the pull to have easy entertainment
overshadowing the need to be accurately informed? In the beginning of his speech, Postman begins
to compare and contrast the views given in both 1984 and Brave New World. One of the more
startling points presented said, "In Orwell's book, ... people are controlled by inflicting pain. In
Brave New World, they are controlled by inflicting pleasure." As a society, we like the easy road.
We like to put in the least amount of effort required in most everything that we do, but this can also
include the process of

Neil Postman's Amusing Ourselves To Death
A public disclosure, if properly executed, is used to introduce an issue in society and address the
problems with that specific problem. Neil Postman's novel Amusing Ourselves to Death,
successfully emphasizes the effect of media in our contemporary society in the form of a public
disclosure. Postman utilizes multiple writing techniques to support his claims. Neil Postman's novel
Amusing Ourselves to Death was written to inform the modern day society as to how media,
specifically television, has negative effects on a persons everyday life by making a person virtually
powerless and turning the population into an audience. Postman uses an example of Aldous Huxley
to demonstrate that our society has been molded into one where the people are too distracted by the
media to examine their lives closer and understand that they are virtually powerless. "Huxley feared
that what we love will ruin us"(2nd page of Foreword). We, as a society, love television. We watch it
when we are bored, when we are tired, and even keep it on when conversations are being had as
background noise. Needless to say we love it. Postman uses this quote to show that television,
something that we love, is distracting ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Everything comes with negatives. "But it is much later in the game now, and ignorance of the score
is inexcusable. To be unaware that a technology comes equipped with a program for social change,
to maintain that technology is neutral, to make the assumption that technology is always a friend to
culture is, at this late hour, stupidity plain and simple"(Chapter 11 Page 5). It is extremely important
to acknowledge and understand that technology can drastically change a society. For the purpose of
this essay the technology is television and the change is our culture valuing entertainment over
substance, which is turning us into a nation who sits back and lets people run the country the way
they

Amusing Ourselves To Death Neil Postman Analysis
In 1985, when Neil Postman penned, Amusing Ourselves to Death, CNN, and the twenty–four–hour
news cycle existed in its infancy and televangelism was still unscathed by the Jim Baker and Jimmy
Swaggart scandals. A B–movie actor sat in the Oval Office. Conceivably most importantly,
television, the love child of the photograph and the telegraph, had reached maturity to become fully
entrenched in American culture after thirty some years (p. 100). Newscasters, preachers, and
politicians had become celebrities. The information presented on the tube was deficient in
meaningful content and lacked context. Nevertheless, the public's level of amusement rode high.
Television's capacity to manipulate public persona and information on the news, in religion, and in
politics creates a vaudeville atmosphere on these modes of public discourse.
First, when it comes to the news, Postman raises the fact that television is a business that sells its
time in minutes and seconds. While the thirty–minute ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Postman calls this anticommuncation, it abandons reason and logic, throws away the rules of
sequence and contradiction. For Nietzsche this is nihilism, for Freud represents schizophrenia in
regards to the theater it is a little ditty called vaudeville. For an example, Postman cites the "Iranian
Hostage Crisis" still fresh in the minds of an early mid–eighties audience. Even though the crisis
was on the news nightly for around a year, most people had no knowledge of basic information
about the Iranians. Yet, nearly everyone had an opinion, mostly based on the emotion based on
watching the news and "being informed". Perhaps this is better described as disinformation, not
false or untrue, but fragmented, irrelevant and misleading. This is the inevitable result of TV news
packaging serious discourse as entertainment, a vaudeville

Amusing Ourselves To Death Chapter Summary
America is a nation that focuses on entertainment and obsesses with what we see on screen, so much
so that it has shaped our modern form of discourse. In his book, Amusing Ourselves to Death, Neil
Postman discusses the way that television has shaped the American culture. He makes the argument
that television has now crept its way into the education system, therefore enforcing the idea that
teaching and learning must now be made entertaining.
Postman titles the tenth chapter of his book "Teaching as an Amusing Activity" to introduce his
views on the impact television has made on education. Postman's belief was that the popularity of
television pushed education and learning to be more entertaining, and now American children are
unable to learn properly in a classroom. Even television that is meant to provide an educational
purpose fails to do so in the way that a traditional classroom does.
In the opening of the tenth chapter of his book, Postman mentions "Sesame Street" and its
immediate popularity among children, parents, and educators. The program seemingly encouraged
children to learn by making learning fun, but then raised the issue that children wouldn't want to
learn unless the information was presented to them in a more entertaining way. Postman made the
argument "that "Sesame Street" undermines what the traditional idea of schooling represents" (143)
and so its viewers were trained to love television, not learning. Further, Postman does not even
believe that "Sesame

Comparing Huxley's Amusing Ourselves To Death
George Orwell and Aldous Huxley both penned novels about their prophecies of a future ruled by
totalitarianism. Neil Postman juxtaposes these prophecies in an excerpt from his book, Amusing
Ourselves to Death. Orwell's vision proclaims the oppression of an external source, while Huxley's
states that the greatest oppression comes from within a society. Postman argues that Huxley's vision
pertains to today's society more than Orwell's. His assertion correctly expresses the fears about
society's future, identifying the power of internal passivity over external captivity. Postman
highlights the power of passivity in society when he contrasts the prophecies of Orwell and Huxley.
Orwell predicts the confinement of the future would come from an external source, the government
... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
This turns into a greedy love, leaving society happy, for there appears to be nothing that needs to be
changed. As long as society maintains a feeling as true as fear, there will be people who continue to
fight against the captivity of totalitarianism. Once fear is replaced by love, the society loses its
ability to discern oppression from progress. People become accustomed to a state of simply existing,
drowning their ability to truly experience life in their passivity. Internal passivity overpowers
external captivity. Orwell's fear of foreign control pales in comparison to the fears of Huxley that
revolve around the sly nature of apathy. Captivity by an external oppressor may overpower freedom,
but it provides society with a fighting urge to overcome. The inconspicuous nature of passivity
allows it to linger in all aspects of society, infiltrating the daily lives of people one step at a time. It
captures society in a different way, numbing the senses while offering false material happiness.
Postman aptly recognizes the validity behind the fears of Huxley's prophesy; by contrasting the
predictions of Orwell and Huxley, he exposes the grave situations that

Neil Postman Amusing Ourselves To Death Analysis
I don't think the specific knowledge a student needs to succeed in school can be defined. It all
depends on what you want to learn, what you find interesting, or simply whatever knowledge you
may need to get a degree. In Neil Postman's book Amusing Ourselves to Death, he devotes a whole
chapter to epistemology. Epistemology is the study of knowledge. Do you ever dread going to those
long lecture classes or those classes where you strictly read or write? The use of media could
quickly change that. There are 2 different ways to gain knowledge: virtually and physically.
Different subjects or topics may require one to learn hands–on or more in–depth. In Postman's book,
Amusing Ourselves to Death, he has a specific chapter written to discuss the changes in
epistemology over time. Postman argues, "The written word ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Learning in school doesn't necessarily require media, however, it is a great tool to grab one's
attention. Most of the time if a student isn't interested in the subject or topic, they'll either get
sidetracked or zone out after a while. When I must learn tasks that require skill I would rather
physically learn what I need to know to become good at it. When I played basketball in High School
and for me to have a great shot, I had to practice on my form and other fundamentals over and over
to eventually create muscle memory. Once it became muscle memory it was a skill for me and I
could do it with ease. I plan to become a physical therapist, so as I get further in my college career I
expect for my instructor to teach me the techniques that I'll need to help my patients through
whatever rehab they may need. There are other subjects that one may prefer to learn more hands–on
or by simply doing it. For example: when I am being taught math, I don't like to just watch a video
and try to learn it, I would rather for my teacher to sit me down and work through the steps of doing
the

Amusing Ourselves To Death Postman Analysis
Clive Thompson and Neil Postman are authors who discuss specific mediums through writing.
Postman writes about the television and newspaper and Thompson writes about the internet age.
Both of these authors use the same approach on their respected mediums. In comparison they both
have the same piece of writing. Comparing side by side, it reveals a bigger idea that the
communication medium always outweigh the cons.
Postman, the author of "Amusing Ourselves to Death", discusses how the television has negatively
affected discourse in America. He uses examples and historical research to make a claim of how it is
effecting discourse. The chapter we are looking into does not relate to the television but rather the
newspaper. His central claim of chapter four revolves around the newspaper. He talks about the
effect on society and the ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Give from both writings, they each present their claims in a positive and enthusiastic manner.
Postman uses a tone of enthusiasm throughout the chapter. In the examples he suggests in chapter
four, he can only infer what was going on. He claims that the people in colonial times were more
aware of their surroundings and into a wider range of subjects such as politics. Using common sense
it's not possible to know whether or not that each person personally knew their neighbor deeply or
into politics. So from using logical thinking Postman only uses positive examples to confirm his
claims. These examples may or may not be true but it is also the same thing Thompson does.
Thompson claims all the positivity of how the internet affects a person's mind. The only difference
between Thompson and Postman is that Thompson states negative effects but explains how it is
misunderstood. Another difference among the writings I that Thompson is able to refer back to other
mediums such meanwhile Postman has nothing to refer back to because he is limited to his example
and primitive

Informative Essay About Neil Postman's Amusing Ourselves...
Neil postman was a jack of all trades, he was an American Author, an educator at New York
University, media theorist, and cultural critic. (PressThink 1) In 1985 Neil Postman published a
book called Amusing Ourselves to Death: Public Discourage in the Age of show Business. The book
provides a look at what happens when politics, journalism, education and even religion become
subject to the demands of entertainment. In his book Amusing Ourselves to Death Postman says that
the content of a culture is contained in its communication, and that the content of communication is
affected by the medium of communication. In other words, Postman is saying that a culture is
defined by its connection of people, and the connection of people is afflicted by technology. Sherry
Turkle is another author that has written a book called Alone Together published in January 2011.
Sherry Turkle is an award winning professor at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology where she
focuses her research on human technology interaction. Alone Together is the results of Turkle's
nearly fifteen year exploration of our lives with technology, she describes new unsettling
relationships between friends, family, parents and children, and new instabilities in how we
understand privacy and community. There is a third author named Julia Angwin that has developed a
book that connects with Postman's argument. Julia Angwin is an award winning investigative
journalist at a news organization called ProPublica. (About)

Analysis of Neil Postman's 'Amusing Ourselves to Death'
'Liking' Form and Function It would be easy to dismiss Neil Postman as just a grumpy old man
complaining about what those young whippersnappers are up to while his generation is upholding
the values of civilization, the last vanguard against the Huns. Except for the fact that he was right:
Modern technologies have allowed individuals to withdraw into themselves, to avoid engaging in
public discourse. This imperils democracy, according to Postman, along with a number of other
social critics of the last several decades. But at least as problematic (even as perilous), according to
Postman, is the fact that many modern technologies and the social habits that accompany them,
discourage any inner dialogue as well so that both private and public lives are silenced to any
meaningful content. Or at least this is an arguable point: Whether or not it is true or the extent to
which it is true is (arguably again) dependent on the form of the technology as well as when it
appeared in the life of the individual. Television had a certain magical quality to it when it was first
introduced: It had the power to entrance those who gathered around it in suburban living rooms.
This was equally true of the range of computer–based technologies. However, and this is in large
measure true of all technologies, as the virtual world has surrounded us in more and more layers, at
least some of us have become more adept at using technologies like Facebook without ceding our
ability to be critical about

Neil Postman 's Assertions And Today 's Society
Christina Contreras
Mr. Limon
ERWC
01 March 2017 Neil Postman's Assertions and Today's Society: Huxley's Brave New World could be
considered almost prophetic by many people today. It is alarmingly obvious how modern society is
eerily similar to Huxley's novel with the constant demand for instant gratification encouraging
laziness, greed, and entitlement. Neil Postman, a contemporary social critic, seems to have noticed
this similarity, as he has made bold, valid statements regarding the text and its relevance to our
world today. This response is strongly in support of those statements and will prove both their
accuracy in clarifying Huxley's intentions and how Postman's assertions compare to society today.
One of Postman's assertions ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
It comes as a justified fear considering everyone is coaxed into using social media by companies
making it overall more convenient to do everything online. Not only does this lead to laziness––
which is terrible for physical health––but selfishness in that what is most important is how the
consumer fairs, not others. In the novel, Linda sleeps with the husbands of other women in an effort
to achieve sexual stimulation. As a result, women "[began] hitting her with a whip...and each time
Linda screamed" (134). Chasing what she loved led to a negative outcome. Kyle Smith, author of
the article "Brave New World (is Here!)", explains how a world prioritizing nothing but pleasure is
nowhere near the heaven people imagine. He explains how "...a happyland free of intimate bonds
and arduous challenges is actually a dystopia". Basically, and more familiarly, too much of anything
is not a good thing, and that includes pleasure. Lastly, at one point John tries to defend morals like
being chaste. He is rebuked by Mustapha Mond, who says, "...[chastity, passion, and
neurasthenia]...lead to instability...and [thus] the end of civilization" (239). As he begins whipping
himself in an act of self–discipline, he is encouraged to continue by a crowd of desensitized people
saying, "Do the whipping stunt. Let's see [it]" (257). These quotes support

Summary Of Amusing Ourselves To Death
Growing up as a child my mom made a habit of watching the morning news regardless of the events
taking place in America. Whether my mom watched the news for entertainment purposes or just to
see what was significant to her has been left unanswered. I start my paragraph to prove a point that
Neil Postman makes in his book, Amusing Ourselves to Death. In Postman's book, he argues that the
news today is for entertainment and it is irrelevant to the people who obtain it. Postman's character,
Henry David Thoreau gives an example of Postman's debate stating, "Perchance the first news that
will leak into the flapping American ear will be that Princess Adelaide has the whooping cough."
Which reminds me of a news segment I observed on News 7, January 25, 2017. The segment
affirmed that a birth ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
He decries how we are presented not only with fragmented news but news without context,
consequences, value, leaving behind crucial seriousness. The most abhorrent story yet will only
receive a short bit of attention only to be abstracted from the next story. There is no time for
reflection and the captivating expression of the news– adorable news anchors, amiable music,
brilliant transitions– only reinforce the idea that the information we receive isn't considered in the
context of our lives. Postman articulates that the now this are words such as but not limited to, back
to you, I'm going to leave it here, and that does it for now. In addition after reviewing the news
segment from News 7 I witnessed the rapid transitions that Postman speaks of. Each segment lasted
a total of perhaps nine seconds which told me it wasn't crucial. Then the topic of the Mosque
shooting in Quebec City, Canada made an appearance across the screen. This segment endured a
time frame of approximately five minutes, longer than any other news article on News 7. If a topic
last more than a few minutes I can assume that it may be significant to the

Postman: Rant or Reason?
In his novel, "Amusing Ourselves to Death", author Neil Postman describes to the reader, in detail,
the immediate and future dangers of television. The arguement starts out in a logical manner,
explaining first the differences between today's media–driven society, and yesterday's "typographic
America". Postman goes on to discuss in the second half of his book the effects of today's media,
politics on television, religion on television, and finally televised educational programs. All, he says,
are making a detrimental imprint on our society, its values, and its standards. Postman explains that
the media consists of "fragment[s] of news" (100), and politics are merely a fashion show. Although
Postman's arguments ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Each one flings bring colors at us for 45 seconds before the subject switches to a new topic. A
society raised on such a format simply cannot endure lengthy debates or speeches. They seem
neither exciting nor entertaining to us. Postman also explains that in response to this switch in
desired format, politicians and presidents have adjusted their means of communication as well. "It is
hard to imagine the present occupant of the White House being capable of constructing such clauses
in similar circumstances." (Postman addressing a very lengthy and inticrate live rebuttal made by
Lincoln in response to one of Douglas' statements, 46) Today's politicians know that in order to
reach audiences, their statements need to be "short and sweet". Unfortunately this sort of
information shortening is not the only weakness which plagues television's functionality as a means
of communication.
To sum up Postman's views about news media on television, one can simply call it "a joke". The
"now this" format of news media works in an identical fashion to the previously described
commercials. "Viewers are rarely required to carry over any thought or feeling from one parcel of
time to another." (100) Here again, Postman is right on the money when he describes the
shortcomings of today's television news. The news show begins with exciting music and
professional–looking visuals which set the mood for the show. One can't help but feel a boost of
importance. It is as though the

Amusing Ourselves To Death Neil Postman
In his book "Amusing Ourselves to Death" Neil Postman argues that the news of today is linked
with entertainment. In today's society, we are obsessed with image and the stories of destination and
violence, and how will the anchorman performance is, stories that have no relation to the news at all
and the news uses this to increase their ratings. by watching the Fox news on 02/13/17 I was able to
confirm that he was correct. Neil Postman said that American no longer exchange ideas, they
exchange image. And that we don't quarrel with proposition; and we only argue with the looks.
Firstly, as human being we are more attractive based on how a person looks. Anchorman and women
are being judge daily based on how they look and how will they perform ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
The white bold letters stinking out of a shiny red background and animation added fading in and out
of the video shown during the broadcast. They music that played before and after was like a school
band playing during a football games. Secondly, Postman's talks about irrelevant "News". Stories
that aren't apart of the news all. stories only chosen to generate audience. As I was watching the
news they talked about cats being abuse, and last minute valentines' gifts, and that student are now
allowed to drink water on school buses, and also an oyster feasible. Thing that don't have nothing to
do with what actually matters in the world. And it is these kinds of stories being told that has
reduced our ability to take the world seriously. Third, Postman also claims about that news going
from a serous topic to a non–serous topic. And I was sitting on the couch drinking my tea the news
goes from talking about a KKK leader being shot in the head to older siblings being smarter than
your younger siblings. or going from talking about a vehicle accented to talking about the

Amusing Ourselves To Death By Neil Postman Analysis
Among nerds and Trekkies, Neil Postman's portrayal of the Typographic Mind perhaps sounds very
much like the mind of Mr. Spock. Like the Vulcan Mind, the Typographic Mind, utilizes a logical
and rational method, it is both detached and objective. Imaginably, the Vulcans were a culture
submerged in the printed word. The author paints a picture of the American written word–based
culture of the eighteenth and nineteenth century in "The Typographic Mind". He calls this the Age of
Exposition in his fourth chapter of his book, Amusing Ourselves to Death. He portrays the influence
on public discourse when based on the written word. It defines the content, the effects on the
audience and shapes the spheres of public life in politics, religion, and ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
He describes the act of reading having a sacred element, ritualistic and with a special meaning.
Reading was not casual as today with our abundance of leisure time. Whether by candlelight or the
morning sun, plow in one hand and a book in the other, reading was a serious endeavor with
purpose. Learning to read was the primary purpose of school (p. 61). Hence, the ability to read held
so much importance at the time because as Postman describes, "the printed word had a monopoly on
both attention and intellect" (p. 60). This print–based culture made for a well–informed public that
could equally grasp both historical references and complicated political matters of the day (p. 46).
Again, it is the Lincoln–Douglas debate, the author highlights that portray this well–informed
public. The audience for these deliberations represented an ability to transform the comprehension
of seeing print–style long, convoluted, complex sentence to hearing them (p. 45). As the receiver of
messages, this well–informed, literate audience of the eighteenth and nineteenth century carried this
skill into many areas of public

Summary Of Amusing Ourselves To Death By Neil Postman
Neil Postman makes a few connections to politics in Amusing Ourselves to Death previous to
chapter nine. In chapter nine Postman really goes in depth on politics. More specifically, he focuses
on discussing how politics and political discuss are affected by television as a medium. The main
points that Postman brings up when explaining problems television creates for politics are all very
similar. However through the use of details and examples Postman clearly demonstrates how
television has changed politics in general, how the way we view politics has been changed by
television, and how television makes politics less credible in general.
Prior to Postman giving his thought on how politics have been changed by television, he gives ...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The way we view has changed, largely in part to television. The appeal to emotion wasn't derived
from politics. Neither was the 30 second commercial. Postman says that it isn't "until the 1950's that
the television commercial made linguistic discourse obsolete as the basis for product decisions."
(127). Since then, commercials have all had a similar format, appealing to your emotions, showing
you why you need it. Emphasis is put on you rather than their products, and how much some
products sold is unreal. This growth in the market for those advertised products isn't refutable, and
obviously politicians realized this technique works because they started using it too. There's little
doubt in my mind that it works for politicians just as much as it works for multi–million dollar
corporations. Emphasis on emotional appeal rather than reason and logic is a big theme in this
chapter, and Postman is correct in making it one because it is undeniably what changes our view on
politics

I disagree with the fears and beliefs that are encapsulated within the excerpts taken from the book
Amusing Ourselves To Death by Neil Postman. Postman summarizes two different viewpoints, one
of Aldous Huxley and one of George Orwell. Orwell's fears focus mainly on oppression by a ruling
government body, where people have no choice in which the way they live. This is a common fear
for our society because it has been around for as long as our civilization has been around. An
example would be that the country of the United States was formed because of the fear that the
Britain would become too oppressive when ruling it. Huxley focuses on a different fear, one that is
much more interesting. He "feared that what we love will ruin us". Rather ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
It has been a great aid in the way people have come to think. Huxley fears that people will become
too dependent on technology. People have always been dependent on technology. Our dependence
on technology gives us the thirst to improve it. Improving upon technology affects our society in
many great ways. Rather than taking months to go from one country to the next via sea routes,
airplane technology can get someone across the ocean in hours. To communicate people use to have
to send letters to one another, having messages take days and even weeks to be delivered and read.
The advancements in telecommunications has made it so much faster and easier to communicate to
anyone in the world instantly with the use of cell phones. To find a piece of information people use
to have to dig around countless of reference books. With advancements like the internet and
smartphones, people can learn or discover just about anything at an instant. Advancements in
medical technology have dramatically improved life expectancy in people. Vaccines prevent many
diseases, an example being polio. Heart disease, one of the top reasons for death in many countries,
has been made more manageable thanks to advancements in heart surgery. People know more than
they have ever had before thanks to improvements in technology. Being dependent on technology is
not bad. It makes us more productive and quick learners than we ever have before. Getting
information is much more easier and faster, allowing people to focus on learning new things sooner.
Ultimately, advancements in technology make a society much more productive and powerful. A
dependency on technology is needed to make sure such advancements

Neil Postman's Warning About Amusing Ourselves to Death

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Sherry Bailey

More from Sherry Bailey (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Neil Postman's Warning About Amusing Ourselves to Death