ElementFormatIs the formatting of the memo correct (heading, .docx

•Download as DOCX, PDF•

0 likes•2 views

Element Format: Is the formatting of the memo correct (heading, spacing, margins, font)? Format: Is the formatting of the memo correct (use of highlighting techniques, tables/graphs/charts, effective white space)? Substance: Does the memo incorporate thorough research and contain sufficient concrete details to be credible and easily understood? Substance: Does the memo appear innovative and effectively present solution(s) that represent originality in thought? Rhetorical strategies: Is the tone and vocabulary appropriate for the audience? Rhetorical strategies: Has the writer made a good case for why this issue is important, and to whom? Cohesion: Does each paragraph have only one main idea? Does each sentence connect to the next? Mechanics: Is the memo free of spelling, mechanical, usage, punctuation, and grammar errors? Research: Is the research thorough, effectively used and presented, and accurately supports ideas? Research: Is the sources list correctly formatted? Do the sources appear credible? .

Education

accurately supports ideas?
Research:
Is the sources list correctly formatted? Do the sources appear
credible?

responding to EACH draft from the other group members by Saturday one page of responding for each draft total 3 pages = $15 -------------------------------------------- Element Format: Is the formatting of the memo correct (heading, spacing, margins, font)? Format: Is the formatting of the memo correct (use of highlighting techniques, tables/graphs/charts, effective white space)? Substance: Does the memo incorporate thorough research and contain sufficient concrete details to be credible and easily understood? Substance: Does the memo appear innovative and effectively present solution(s) that represent originality in thought? Rhetorical strategies: Is the tone and vocabulary appropriate for the audience? Rhetorical strategies: Has the writer made a good case for why this issue is important, and to whom? Cohesion: Does each paragraph have only one main idea? Does each sentence connect to the next? Mechanics: Is the memo free of spelling, mechanical, usage, punctuation, and grammar errors? Research: Is the research thorough, effectively used and presented, and accurately supports ideas? Research: Is the sources list correctly formatted? Do the sources appear credible? .

Technical Comms Quality Checks Nf

John_Wilson

Self-Edit FormComplete the form by inserting your answers and su.docx

kenjordan97598

Self-Edit Form Complete the form by inserting your answers and suggestions in the right column. (The column expands as you write.) Self-Edit Questions Notes to Yourself - What You Changed Or Plan to Change for Improvement 1. Is the title original? Is the title relevant to the paper content? 2. Does the opening paragraph catch your attention? Does the opening paragraph lead smoothly into the thesis? 3. Is the thesis statement clear and effective? Does the thesis statement accurately capture the overall message of the paper? 4. Does the paper flow well, following your outline. Are there smooth transitions between paragraphs? Is the content organized in a logical way that allows for development of ideas? 5. What mechanical problems do you find? (Spelling, Grammar, Wording, Sentence structure, etc.) 6. Is the content relevant to the topic? Does the content support the thesis of the paper? 7. Does the conclusion effectively summarize the content? 8. Is the paper formatted using proper APA standards (title page, page numbers, etc.)? 9. Are references relevant and credible? Are references listed in proper APA format in a References Page? 10. What further research might help to add more depth to the paper? Confidential & Proprietary © Rasmussen 2010 1 .

Self-Edit FormComplete the form by inserting your answers and su.docx

bagotjesusa

Checklist_for_CAE_Writing.pdf

Vanesa Merino

1Week 5Critiquing Research Articles to Prepare an Annotated B.docx

felicidaddinwoodie

1 Week 5:Critiquing Research Articles to Prepare an Annotated Bibliography As mentioned, one component of becoming an independent scholar is learning how to provide an evaluative critique of the work of other scholars. A critique of scholarly work requires your ability to use high level critical thinking skills. In addition, you must be able to write constructively and communicate your ideas well with clear and focused writing. The purpose of this assignment is two-fold. First, you are to demonstrate your ability to clearly and precisely summarize and critically evaluate specific information from peer-reviewed resources. Secondly, you are to demonstrate your ability to clearly present that evaluative information in writing that meets academic and professional expectations. These skills will be invaluable as you go on to develop your literature review and in your journey to become an independent scholar. The result of this activity is produce annotated bibliographies based on the two peer-reviewed journal articles related to your chosen topic (you are welcome to include more articles for practice and feedback). Use the sections and questions below to help you critique each article. You do not need to answer every single question as some questions might not apply. The questions are listed as a means to help you generate ideas as you work on critiquing each article. You might also consider using this template in the future when critically analyzing articles. Please REMOVE the instructions and questions listed below for your paper and submit an annotated bibliography for each article. Link to peer reviewed article one: http://intqhc.oxfordjournals.org/content/19/6/341 1) APA reference for article #1 2)Introductionand core study elements · Give an overview of the purpose of the study and the problem or issue discussed. · Consider whether the problem is clearly described. Did the author(s) document and support the existence of the problem with scholarly sources and data? Were the sources credible and relevant (as defined by the readings you’ve done for this course)? · What were the research questions? · What were the key findings and conclusions of the study? 3) Evaluate literature reviewed · Examine the literature reviewed by the author(s). How relevant is the) cited literature? Do certain ideas or concepts appear to be over/underemphasized? Was there any bias in language or tone of the writing? What discussions need elaboration or could be more concise? What is missing? 4) Evaluate theoretical framework · What theoretical or conceptual framework was used as the basis for the study? What are the key variables and from which theories do they originate? Are variables well-defined? What alternative theories might support this study? 5) Evaluate methods · What research method and designs are used in this study? · How well are the methods described (could a reader duplicate the research process if needed)? · Do the m ...

EED 364 Due Date Mar 11, 2017Science LessonObserve a scien.docx

LinaCovington707

EED 364 Due Date: Mar 11, 2017 Science Lesson Observe a science lesson being taught in the classroom. Write a 250-500 word reflection based on your observation that addresses the following questions. 1. Did the science teacher integrate other content areas into the science lesson, such as reading, writing, math, and technology? 2. Did the teacher incorporate technology into the lesson? 3. What supplies/handouts, if any, did the teacher use? 4. Were science standards used? 5. What types of assessments were used by the teacher? 6. Was differentiated instruction evident? 7. Was this lesson successful? If so, what made it successful? 8. Would you try this approach in the future once you are in the classroom or in control of the lesson creation? Why or why not? 9. How would you make this lesson more successful/engaging? Prepare this assignment according to the APA EED 364 Due Date: Mar 11, 2017 Details: Design a PowerPoint presentation demonstrating five different technology resources that can be used to enhance science and math instruction. These could be apps, computer programs, videos, websites, etc. In a 10-15 slide PowerPoint presentation, include the following: A detailed description of each technology and how it works An explanation of how technology components align to standards. Completed Technology Presentation form for each technology Please follow the following rubric Technology Resources Descriptions of each technology, how it works, and how components align to standards are thoroughly explained and insightful. Technology form is complete for each technology. Presentation of Content The content is written clearly and concisely. Ideas universally progress and relate to each other. The project includes motivating questions and advanced organizers. The project gives the audience a clear sense of the main idea. Layout The layout is visually pleasing and contributes to the overall message with appropriate use of headings, subheadings, and white space. Text is appropriate in length for the target audience and to the point. The background and colors enhance the readability of the text. Thesis Development and Purpose The writer uses a variety of sentence constructions, figures of speech, and word choice in distinctive and creative ways that are appropriate to purpose, discipline, and scope. Language Use and Audience Awareness (includes sentence construction, word choice, etc.) There is a sophisticated construction of paragraphs and transitions. Ideas progress and relate to each other. Paragraph and transition construction guide the reader. Paragraph structure is seamless. Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) Writer is clearly in control of standard, written academic English. Research Citations (in-text citations for paraphrasing and direct quotes, and reference page listing and formatting, as appropriate to assignment and style) In-text citations and a reference page are complete an.

Essay writing checklist by Mahfoudh Hussein MgammalDr. Mahfoudh Hussein Mgammal

Assignment Details: This assignment has 4 parts. 1. What competencies were you able to develop in researching and writing the course Comprehensive Project? How did you leverage knowledge gained in the intellipath assignments (Units 1- 4) in completing the Comprehensive Project? How will these competencies and knowledge support your career advancement in management? 2. Marketers must consider the strategic implications of buyer behavior, market segmentation, product positioning, pricing, distribution, advertising management, and customer relationship management. Analyze how your strategic marketing plan fits with your mission statement and goals and what type of target audience would your pricing objectives likely to positively affect. 3. Detail how you will use customer relationship management to ensure loyalty to your product and the brand. 4. What role does technology play in supporting your customer relationship management plan? Deliverable Length: 400 words (minimum) Exceptional (5) Excellent (4) Good (3) Poor (2) Unacceptable (1) Expression, style, and structure Exceptional introduction that grabs interest of reader and provides a well established, clear, and concise statement of purpose. Exceptionally clear, logical, mature, and thorough development of thesis with excellent transitions between and within sections. Conclusion provides an exceptional summary of the topic with concluding ideas that impact the reader and introduces no new information. The style and voice are not only appropriate to the given audience and purpose, but also show originality and creativity. Excellent introduction that is interesting and states the research topic. Thesis is clear and an arguable statement of position. The paper is written in a clear and logical order that supports thesis with excellent transitions between and within sections. The conclusion provides an excellent summary of the topic with clear concluding ideas and introduces no new information. The style and voice are appropriate for the audience and the purpose of the paper. Good introduction that is interesting and states the purpose of the research topic. The thesis is for the most part clear and provides an arguable statement of position. The paper is written in a clear and logical order that supports thesis with good transitions between and within sections. The conclusion provides a good summary of topic with clear concluding ideas while introducing no new information. The overall style and voice are appropriate for the audience and the purpose of the paper. Basic introduction that states the topic but lacks interest. Thesis is somewhat clear and arguable. Somewhat clear and logical development with basic transitions between and within sections. Conclusion provides a basic summary of topic with some final concluding ideas. The conclusion introduces new information and/or is lacking clarity. .

A checklist for reviewing a paper

Mohammed Esawie

Search the TED Talk Website and search for a presentation (10 mi.docx

rtodd280

Search the TED Talk Website and search for a presentation (10 minutes or longer) that interests you. Then write a 1-2 pages, double spaced, report that includes terms and techniques we discussed in class and how the speaker uses them (ex. attention-getter, research, patterns of speech organization, body language, etc.). Summarize the discussion topic (limit this to one paragraph) Was the speech informative or persuasive? How did you know? What language did the speaker use? How did the speaker gain your attention? What techniques are used? How was the speech delivered? What techniques did the speaker use? Were there any insightful or impactful messages? Does the speaker use additional research, personal experience, or both as support? How? Did the speaker use a speech organization pattern like we discussed in class? Did the speaker have an impactful ending? How did the speaker conclude the talk? .

Search the TED Talk Website and search for a presentation (10 mi

NarcisaBrandenburg70

Needs analysis In ESP

Karakorum International University

Extra Credit-TED TalksOutline Revisions 40 Points PossiblePlea.docx

mecklenburgstrelitzh

Extra Credit-TED Talks/Outline Revisions: 40 Points Possible Please note that excessive grammatical errors and missing components will receive No Credit !!!! This is due on the last day of speeches. Speech Analysis: Search the TED Talk Website and search for a presentation (10 minutes or longer) that interests you. Then write a 2-3 page, double spaced, report that includes terms and techniques we discussed in class and how the speaker uses them (ex. attention getter, research, patterns of speech organization, body language, etc.). Also, copy and paste the link on the paper. Send both an electric and hard copy to receive credit. Summarize the discussion topic (limit this to one paragraph) Was the speech informative or persuasive? How did you know? What language did the speaker use? How did the speaker gain your attention? What techniques are used? How was the speech delivered? What techniques did the speaker use? Were there any insightful or impactful messages? Does the speaker use additional research, personal experience, or both as support? How? Did the speaker use a speech organization pattern like we discussed in class? Did the speaker have an impactful ending? How did the speaker conclude the talk? .

Critical reading

Mubariz Zirman

Stance EssayDue Week 10 and worth 230 pointsCongratulati.docx

darwinming1

Stance Essay Due Week 10 and worth 230 points Congratulations! You made it to your final assignment, and you have learned so much along the way. In the personal essay, you learned how to write with a strong personal voice. In the informative essay, you learned how to write objectively and support your points with credible sources to inform the audience. Now in your final assignment, you will combine these writing techniques to write a stance essay. A stance essay takes a position on a topic and argues and supports that position with evidence. Consider your topic: What possible positions/arguments are there? What position resonates with you? (Which position do you believe is correct?) What are your main points? What are the counterpoints? Are you ready to dispute them? Do you have enough evidence to effectively support your argument? For the stance essay, your personal voice (your perspective) should come through. This is just like assignment 1, except you should maintain a formal tone. And just like assignment 2, you will need to support your points with credible sources. You’re ready to take a position on the topic you have been writing about and to be persuasive! INSTRUCTIONS: Compose a three-four (3-4) page paper in which you do the following: Use third person point of view (POV) and the appropriate voice and tone throughout your paper. Did you use third person pronouns? (he, she, they, their) Does your personality carry over in your writing? Are your word choices personal and consistent? Is the tone formal? Does it express your attitude about the topic? Write an introduction paragraph, which includes your thesis statement. It is suggested that this paragraph contain 5-7 sentences. Does your introduction include solutions or approaches on the topic? Does your thesis statement include three supporting reasons that clearly express your stance on the topic? Is your thesis statement clear and concise? Does your introduction provide a preview of the rest of your essay? Write a supporting/body paragraph for each of the three (3) points/reasons from your thesis statement. It is suggested that each paragraph contain at least 5-7 sentences. Do your body paragraphs support each point of your thesis with relevant examples or statistics? Do you address the opinions or concerns that your audience might have? Did you paraphrase, quote, or summarize properly to avoid plagiarism? Did you comment on each quotation? Write with logic and with transitions throughout your paper. Are your ideas consistent and well-organized, i.e., chronological order or order of importance? Do your ideas flow from one sentence to the next and one paragraph to the next, in the order presented in your thesis statement? Write a conclusion paragraph. It is suggested that this paragraph contain 5-7 sentences. Did you paraphrase or restate the thesis in a new way? Did you leave a lasting impression, so that your ...

Close Reading Lit 61R Close Reading In literary studies,.docx

clarebernice

Close Reading: Lit 61R: Close Reading In literary studies, close reading is one of our primary tools of analysis. Close reading is a methodology that involves a careful, critical reading of a passage from a text. This reading is then used to fuel an argument about the text itself. Not to be confused with a surface plot summary, close reading asks us to focus on how the meaning of the text is constructed through its language, structure, and content. Strategies for Close Reading: Carefully read the entire text. Be sure to take notes in the margins. Underline or highlight sentences/passages that stand out in your reading. Once you understand the plot of the story, try to develop a deeper understanding of the text. Go back through your notes and annotations, what is happening below the surface of the text? What is its underlying content? Pay close attention to the language of the text. What vocabulary is the author using? Are there certain words that are repeated in the story? Why do you think these words are repeated? Are there implied or double meanings to these words? How does this use of language contribute to your understanding of the text? It might be helpful to isolate one sentence to analyze how language is working in the text. Analyze the imagery of the text. What images, symbols, or tropes is the author utilizing and why? Does this imagery reveal a theme or pattern in the text? Are there metaphors or figurative language in the text? Are there objects or images in the story that stand in for a deeper meaning beyond their surface representation? How does these metaphors aid or further your understanding of the text? Pay attention to the syntax (grammar) and structure of the text. How is the author using sentence structure/style, narrative structure, and grammar (i.e. punctuation)? How do these elements also contribute to the underlying meaning(s) of the text? Why are these observations important? How can you use them to generate an analysis of the text? ...

Multimodal presentation by_claire_thickettjannski

Analyzing Multimodal Design-Presentation handout

Susan Rauch, PhD

Step by step stylistic analysis

Waldorf Oberberg

Needs analysis

iqbal hussain

Step One Write a draft of your paper. (A minimum of 2 FULL pages) .docx

jensgosney

Step One: Write a draft of your paper. (A minimum of 2 FULL pages) Step Two: Log into ecampus and mail a copy of your paper to your peer review partner and CC a copy to me. (You don’t have to do this through ecampus if you have both their email address and my email address directly.) In the body of the email you should ask your partner to focus on certain aspects of your paper about which you have concerns. DO NOT FORGET TO ATTACH THE WORK. If you do not attach the work you will not receive credit for the assignment. Please note: If you are late in submitting your paper to your partner or to me, or do not email your partner, you will lose a full letter grade. Step Three: Read your partner’s work carefully and thoroughly—a critical reader. A critical reader questions the paper’s argument and looks for appropriate use of rhetorical strategies, such as good supporting evidence, organization and structure, and voice. Use ‘track changes’ or the comment box feature in Word to document your peer review. **You must make notes in the margins (suggestions include: structural issues, organization issues, transitions, word choice, awkward phrases, argument fallacies, citation problems, missing evidence, etc.). Use track changes, comment boxes in the review section, or even write inside the draft with a different font color. Step Four: Compose a one-page single-spaced feedback letter with specific, constructive advice. This letter should be directed toward your partner. It can be a somewhat informal tone, but it should be the type of letter you would want to receive. You should address the points I have listed (you can use bullet points or any other type of list format). Use professional formatting. Plan to address (at the bare minimum): The Introduction: Does the author have an interesting hook? Is there enough context to situate the reader? Is there evidence of the current conversation? The Thesis: Is the thesis clear, concise and compelling? Does it provide a road map for the rest of the paper? Is the topic narrow enough for a 4+ page paper? Support & Evidence: Does the author use sources appropriately? Do you feel as though the author maintained his or her voice throughout the paper? Are the quotes properly contextualized (i.e. no hanging quotes that are plopped into a paragraph without explanation)? Are the citations correct? Does the author seem to have a solid understanding of the current scholarship about his or her topic? Structure: Does the author have a logical progression of ideas? Does the evidence support the author’s claim? Does the author make use of effective argument techniques (AKA explain ethos, pathos, and logos within their advertisement well and with support)? Transitions: Does the author move smoothly from one paragraph to the next? Is there a sense of logical development? Writing Issues: Are there any issues with mechanics (punctuation, grammar or style) that need to be addressed? Step Five: Log into ecampus and m.

Rhetorical frameworkfrickewi

Digital research project peer review form media 21 fall 2011 voice threadB. Hamilton

This is the second part of Margaret SangerSignificant Contribution.docx

ElementFormatIs the formatting of the memo correct (heading, .docx

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

Similar to ElementFormatIs the formatting of the memo correct (heading, .docx

Similar to ElementFormatIs the formatting of the memo correct (heading, .docx (17)

More from shandicollingwood

More from shandicollingwood (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

ElementFormatIs the formatting of the memo correct (heading, .docx