The U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service conducted a thin layer sediment augmentation project at Seal Beach National Wildlife Refuge to address subsidence and sea level rise threatening the salt marsh habitat. Sediment dredged from a nearby harbor was sprayed over 10 acres in a thin layer to elevate the marsh surface. Extensive monitoring was conducted before, during, and for 5 years after construction to evaluate impacts to vegetation, birds, and other wildlife and the effectiveness of elevation gains. Lessons learned included better estimating sediment volumes needed and construction timelines. The project aims to develop long-term strategies for sustaining Pacific coast wetlands under climate change.
USFWS Salt Marsh Sediment Augmentation Project Lessons
1. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
Seal Beach National Wildlife Refuge
Thin Layer Salt Marsh Sediment
Augmentation Project
Construction and Lessons Learned
Rick NyeRick Nye -- Refuge BiologistRefuge Biologist -- Seal Beach NWRSeal Beach NWR
2. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
ProblemProblem
•• 965 acre refuge965 acre refuge
-- 59% (565 acres)59% (565 acres)
intertidal salt marshintertidal salt marsh
•• Subsidence rate:Subsidence rate:
-- 4.13mm/4.13mm/yryr
(SE(SE ++ 1.21 mm/1.21 mm/yryr))
•• Relative Sea Level RiseRelative Sea Level Rise
6.23 mm/6.23 mm/yryr
•• Subtidal in 60 yearsSubtidal in 60 years
3. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
Dredge Material OpportunityDredge Material Opportunity
4. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
Research & MonitoringResearch & Monitoring
Timeline:Timeline:
66--mos Premos Pre--augmentation toaugmentation to
55--yrs Postyrs Post--augmentationaugmentation
•• Site elevationsSite elevations
•• Sediment depth overtimeSediment depth overtime
•• Compaction rateCompaction rate
•• Tidal creek reformationTidal creek reformation
•• Vegetation % coverVegetation % cover
•• Species compositionSpecies composition
•• BiomassBiomass
•• Cordgrass assessmentCordgrass assessment
•• Plant PhysiologyPlant Physiology
•• Invertebrate speciesInvertebrate species
•• Eelgrass healthEelgrass health
•• Ridgeway’s RailsRidgeway’s Rails
•• other avian activityother avian activity
•• Carbon sequestrationCarbon sequestration
5. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
MitigationMitigation MeasuresMeasures
•• Relocate rail nesting platformsRelocate rail nesting platforms
•• Haze birds off project siteHaze birds off project site
•• Minimize avian predator perchingMinimize avian predator perching
•• Patrol pipeline for leaks, sea turtles, and marine mammalsPatrol pipeline for leaks, sea turtles, and marine mammals
•• Conduct eelgrass surveys (pre, 1 year, 2 year)Conduct eelgrass surveys (pre, 1 year, 2 year)
•• Vegetated “Buffer zone” of 50 ft. from waters edgeVegetated “Buffer zone” of 50 ft. from waters edge
•• Silt barriers on augmentation siteSilt barriers on augmentation site
•• InIn--water silt curtains for dredge operationswater silt curtains for dredge operations
•• Monitor turbidityMonitor turbidity
•• Minimize eelgrass impactMinimize eelgrass impact
•• Keep bioKeep bio--monitor on sitemonitor on site
6. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
ConstructionConstruction RequirementsRequirements
•• PrePre--augmentation RTK surveyaugmentation RTK survey
•• Install 10m gridInstall 10m grid
•• Implement mitigation measuresImplement mitigation measures
•• Test application methodsTest application methods
•• Install sediment barrierInstall sediment barrier
•• Install silt fencingInstall silt fencing
•• Maintain 50 ft. bufferMaintain 50 ft. buffer
•• Apply 10” sedimentApply 10” sediment
++ 1” at grid poles1” at grid poles
++ 1.8” between poles1.8” between poles
•• Respond to unexpected issuesRespond to unexpected issues
•• PostPost--augmentationaugmentation
photogrammetry surveyphotogrammetry survey
7. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
Photo by Rick Nye//USFWSPhoto by Rick Nye//USFWS
Photo by Kirk Gilligan/USFWSPhoto by Kirk Gilligan/USFWS
Photo by Rick Nye//USFWSPhoto by Rick Nye//USFWSPhoto by Kirk Gilligan/USFWSPhoto by Kirk Gilligan/USFWS
Construction EquipmentConstruction Equipment
8. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
Photo by Curtin MaritimePhoto by Curtin Maritime
Photo by Rick Nye//USFWSPhoto by Rick Nye//USFWS
NozzleNozzle SelectionSelection
Photo by Rick Nye//USFWSPhoto by Rick Nye//USFWS
Photo by Kirk Gilligan/USFWSPhoto by Kirk Gilligan/USFWS
9. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
Source MaterialSource Material
•• Better sampling of grain sizeBetter sampling of grain size
•• Avoid pockets of garbageAvoid pockets of garbage
•• Contract required trash pickContract required trash pick--upup
Photo by Rick Nye//USFWSPhoto by Rick Nye//USFWS
10. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
Spraying ImpactsSpraying Impacts
Photo by Rick Nye//USFWSPhoto by Rick Nye//USFWS
Photo by Rick Nye//USFWSPhoto by Rick Nye//USFWS
•• Birds relatively undeterredBirds relatively undeterred
•• Noise level ~60dBNoise level ~60dB
•• Ridgeway’s rail hiding near equipmentRidgeway’s rail hiding near equipment
Photo by Rick Nye//USFWSPhoto by Rick Nye//USFWS
11. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
Sediment BarriersSediment Barriers
Photo by Kirk Gilligan/USFWSPhoto by Kirk Gilligan/USFWS
Photo by Curtin MaritimePhoto by Curtin Maritime
Photo by Rick Nye//USFWSPhoto by Rick Nye//USFWS
12. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
•• New sediment compactionNew sediment compaction
–– 20% to 30% during 120% to 30% during 1stst 7272 hrshrs
•• Variances in underlyingVariances in underlying
marsh compactionmarsh compaction
•• Coring verificationCoring verification
–– AccessAccess
–– Labor intensiveLabor intensive
•• Bathtub/Lava effectBathtub/Lava effect
•• Consistent pole installationConsistent pole installation
standardsstandards
–– Research TeamResearch Team
–– ContractorContractor
–– >500 grid + research poles>500 grid + research poles
Estimating Depths During ConstructionEstimating Depths During Construction
13. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
Final ElevationsFinal Elevations
Photogrammetry surveyPhotogrammetry survey ––
●● 0.10.1 -- 0.050.05 ftft accuracyaccuracy
Calculated sediment depthCalculated sediment depth ––
●● 9.6” on average9.6” on average
●● 40% of poles were 10” + 1”40% of poles were 10” + 1”
●● 6363% of poles were 10” + 2”% of poles were 10” + 2”
●● Large depth varianceLarge depth variance
across 40% of the siteacross 40% of the site
14. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
Estimation ErrorsEstimation Errors
Construction timelineConstruction timeline ––
Estimated: 1 monthEstimated: 1 month
Actual: 1Actual: 1stst thirdthird -- 22 mosmos
Remainder: 2Remainder: 2 wkswks
●● Equipment breakdownsEquipment breakdowns
●● Sediment barrierSediment barrier
maintenancemaintenance
Sediment volumeSediment volume ––
Estimated:Estimated:
13,500 yd13,500 yd33 for 10.0 acfor 10.0 ac
Actual:Actual:
16,875 yd16,875 yd33 for 7.87 acfor 7.87 ac
Better estimate would be:Better estimate would be:
22,000 yd22,000 yd33 for 10.0 acfor 10.0 ac
15. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
Funding and TimelinesFunding and Timelines
•• Contractor bill for dredging and placementContractor bill for dredging and placement::
-- $$1.35 million1.35 million
•• Time for planning, funding requests and permitting:Time for planning, funding requests and permitting:
-- 2.5 years2.5 years
•• PostPost--augmentation research and evaluation:augmentation research and evaluation:
-- 5 years5 years
-- $1.5 million (includes monitoring during construction)$1.5 million (includes monitoring during construction)
16. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
DataData Dissemination & OutreachDissemination & Outreach
•• Publish postPublish post--construction monitoring reports annuallyconstruction monitoring reports annually
•• Refuge webpage to provide quarterly updates, reports,Refuge webpage to provide quarterly updates, reports,
photos, & time lapse videophotos, & time lapse video
•• Conduct a workshop/webinar to present monitoring resultsConduct a workshop/webinar to present monitoring results
•• Prepare a final report with lessons learned andPrepare a final report with lessons learned and
recommendations for future projectsrecommendations for future projects
•• Research team regularly present their efforts atResearch team regularly present their efforts at
conferencesconferences
17. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
Big pictureBig picture
Implement and evaluate thin layer placement as a adaptationImplement and evaluate thin layer placement as a adaptation
strategy for regional sea level rise and climate change.strategy for regional sea level rise and climate change.
Be able to use this strategy at regular intervals for long termBe able to use this strategy at regular intervals for long term
sustainability of Pacific coast marshes.sustainability of Pacific coast marshes.
18. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
ForFor further information contactfurther information contact::
Kirk GilliganKirk Gilligan
Refuge ManagerRefuge Manager –– Seal Beach NWRSeal Beach NWR
kkirk_gilligan@fws.govirk_gilligan@fws.gov
562562--598598--10241024
OrOr
Vicki TouchstoneVicki Touchstone
Refuge PlannerRefuge Planner –– San Diego NWR ComplexSan Diego NWR Complex
vvictoria_touchstone@fws.govictoria_touchstone@fws.gov
619619--476476--9150 Ext. 1039150 Ext. 103
Reports and time lapse videos:Reports and time lapse videos:
www.fws.gov/refuge/seal_beach/what_we_do/resourwww.fws.gov/refuge/seal_beach/what_we_do/resour
ce_management/Sediment_Pilot_Project.htmlce_management/Sediment_Pilot_Project.html