1. Model Host Systems
Choice of host depends on several needs:
Costs and availability of supports (kits, vectors, reagents and expertise)
Yield – large mass of protein presents specific challenges for scale up (bacteria/yeast vs.
mammalian)
How will the protein be used after expression?
Toxicity of protein on host cell
Post-translational modification
Impact on host cell on protein solubility and hydrolysis
Location of protein within the host cell – membrane, inclusion body, secretion into media
Complexity of medium
(A) E. coli
Advantages:
First choice due to level of support (technical, literature, kits, plasmids, reagents)
High yield and easier scale up (up to 100 mg per liter of culture)
Cost of media and reagents is relatively inexpensive
Many expression plasmids – many with gene expression regulation
Fast growth condition – one to two days from starter culture to cell pellet
Up to 50% of protein can be target protein
Simple culture conditions
Simple transformation protocols
Many parameters can be altered to optimize expression
Disadvantages:
Minimal post-translational modification
Lipid modification, phosphorylation, glycosylation, decarboxylation, acetylation
can not be performed, these may be critical requirements for functional protein
Large proteins may be difficult to express (plasmid size is limited to about 15 kb)
Poor folding of proteins in the cytoplasm
In vitro refolding protocols are inefficient in this system
2. Large number of proteins are toxic to E.coli
Inclusion body packing of protein
Insoluble, aggregated and non-native protein
Often times takes place in high expressed or toxic proteins
Codon Use differences, false stops and low expression
Inefficient disulfide bond formation
Endotoxin production
Example of expression vector used: pET series, pGEX series, pBAD
(B) Fungi
(I) Saccharomyces cerevisae
Advantages:
Good expression levels
Choice of secreted or cellular expression
Low cost
Simple culture conditions
Scalable
Able to perform most eukaryotic post-translational modifications
Efficient protein folding
Endotoxin free
Disadvantages:
Likely lower expression than Pichia pastoris
Secretion likely lower than Pichia pastoris
Glycosylation still different to mammalian cells
A tendency to hyperglycosylate proteins
N-glycan structures considered allergenic
3. (II) Pichia pastoris
Advantages:
High expression levels
Low cost
Simple culture conditions
Relatively rapid growth
Scalable
Choice of secreted or intracellular expression
Protein secretion efficient and allows simple purification
Extensive post-translational modification of proteins
Efficient protein folding
N-glycosylation more like higher eukaryotes than with Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Endotoxin free
Disadvantages:
Use of methanol as inducer is a safety (fire) hazard at scale
Glycosylation still different to mammalian cells
Example of expression vector used: pAO815, pGAPZ, pPIC series, pHIL series
(C) Mammalian cell lines
Advantages:
Good expression levels
Moderately scalable
Suspension-adapted cells facilitate scale-up
Efficient protein folding
Good for secreted proteins
All post-translational modifications
Endotoxin free
Disadvantages:
Expensive culture media
Complex growth requirements
4. Example of expression vector used: pcDNA series, pCMV series, pJRed series
(D) Insect cells (Baculovirus infected insect cells)
Advantages:
Good expression levels (especially for intracellular proteins)
Relatively rapid growth
Efficient protein folding
Moderately scalable
Extensive post-translational modification of proteins
Glycosylation more like mammalian cells
Relatively deglycosylate protein enzymatically (good for structure determination)
Endotoxin free
Disadvantages:
Expensive culture media
Large scale of virus needed on scale-up
Inefficient processing of pro-peptides in the secretory pathway
Glycosylation still different to mammalian cells
Viral infection leads to cell lysis and potential degradation of expressed proteins
Example of expression vector used: pAcP series, pBAC series, pAcUW31
(E) Transgenic plants:
Advantages:
Plants contain no known human pathogens (such as prions, virions, etc.) that could
contaminate the final product
Higher plants generally synthesize proteins from eukaryotes with correct folding,
glycosylation & activity
Significantly lower production cost than with transgenic animals, fermentation or
bioreactors
Reducing the costs of storage and transportation of recombinant proteins (when they are
produced in dry textures like grains)
5. Low ethical concerns
Easier purification (homologs don’t pose any purification challenge, e.g. serum proteins
or antibodies)
Versatile (production of a broad diversity of proteins)
Disadvantages:
Take more time to develop
Transgene & protein pollution
(F) Transgenic animals:
Advantages:
Low cost of production
More efficient system
Higher stability of proteins
All the post-translational modifications
Reduced risk of immunogenicity
No or reduced aseptic conditions required
Disadvantages:
Limited by legal and ethical restrictions
Health related complications in transgenic animals
Low rate of success
Prior extensive knowledge required
Potential pathogenic infection
Relatively time consuming
Scaling up problems