2. •What is the Texas Campus STaR Chart?
•What is the STaR Chart designed to do?
•What does the information provide?
•How is SSMS Classified in each key
area?
4. Evaluates Four Key Areas
•Teaching and Learning
•Leadership, Administration &
Instructional Support
•Educator Preparation and
Development
•Infrastructure for Technology
5. Help teachers, campuses,
and districts determine their
progress toward meeting:
•Goals of the Long Range
Plan for Technology
•Goals of the District
7. STaR Chart Levels of
Classifications
•Early Tech (6-8)
•Developing Tech (9-14)
•Advanced Tech (15-20)
•Target Tech (21-24)
8.
9. 25
20
15
2008-2009
2009-2010
10 2010-2011
5
0
Teaching & Learning Education Prep & Leadership, Admin Infrastructure for
Development &Instructional Support Technology
10. Summary Area Key Area Totals Key Area STaR Classifications
2010-11: 12 2010-11:Developing
Teaching & Learning 2009-10: 12 2009-10:Developing
2008-09: 12 2008-09: Developing
2010-11: 12 2010-11:Developing
Educator Preparation &
2009-10: 10 2009-10:Developing
Development
2008-09: 12 2008-09:Developing
Leadership, Administrat 2010-11: 13 2010-11:Developing
ion, & Instructional 2009-10: 13 2009-10:Developing
Support 2008-09: 13 2008-09:Developing
2010-11: 14 2010-11:Developing
Infrastructure for
2009-10: 14 2009-10:Developing
Technology
2008-09: 20 2008-09:Advanced
11. Conclusions
•For 3 years we have maintained Developing Tech in all
four areas except for Infrastructure for Technology in 2008-
2009
•Lowest average was in Educator Preparation and
Development
12. Recommendations
•Additional Staff Development on integration of technology.
•Provide access to professional development for online
learning.
•Establish goals to move towards Target Tech.